ML20215N099

Package of Three Comments Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR19, 20,30,31,32,34,40,50,61 & 70 Re Backfit Analysis.Analysis Does Not Provide Detailed Comparison of Costs & Benefits Necessary for Implementing Principal Decision Making
Person / Time
ML20215N099
Issue date:	10/29/1986
From:	Farrar D, Iselen C, Schadt W AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED, COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:	Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-50FR51992, RULE-PR-19, RULE-PR-20, RULE-PR-30, RULE-PR-31, RULE-PR-32, RULE-PR-34, RULE-PR-40, RULE-PR-50, RULE-PR-61, RULE-PR-70 NUDOCS 8611040271
Download: ML20215N099 (16)
v • d • e

v t e Similar Documents from Exelon, Farrar D, AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED, Schadt W, Iselen C
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS [Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE [Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". Category:UTILITY TO NRC [Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "".

Navigation menu