ML20215N036
| ML20215N036 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 10/24/1986 |
| From: | Bordenick B NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
| To: | Frye J, Paris O, Shon F Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| CON-#486-1311 OL-5, NUDOCS 8611040195 | |
| Download: ML20215N036 (5) | |
Text
/3//
4i{
gELATED CORRESPONDENCE pec,
o
![p v.
,k UNITED STATES
(,g NUCLEAR REGULA O((OMMISSION r
5 gN/
j WASHINGTo,
55
%; ch OCT 2 41986 krfo Margulies, Chairman John H.
rye, III, Chairman Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Boar 4FFR OF Atomic: Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissi6eCKLT)TjU.S.' Nuclese Regulatory Commission
- Washington, D.C.
20555
- Washington, D.C.
20555 Mr. Frederick J. Shon Dr. Jerry R. Kline Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atc,mic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C.
20555 Oscar II. Paris Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board l
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 In the Matter of I
LONG ISLAND LIGIITING COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1)
Docket No. 50-322-OL-3 (Emergency Planning)
Docket No. 50-322-OL-5 (EP Exercise)
I
Dear Administrative Judges:
l l
Attached for your information is a ecpy of a Memorandum dated October 6, 1986, from D. McLoughin, Deputy Associate Director, State and Local Program and Support, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), to N. Steinlauf, Acting Regional Director, FEMA Region II, New York,.concerning " Review of the Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO)
Transition Plan and LILCO Responses to the FEMA Exercise Report".
The attachments to the Memorandum are also enclosed.
Sincerely, hU-MAj Y
Bernard M. Bordenick Counsel for NRC Staff
~
Enclosures:
As Stated cc: With Enclosure Service List i
nPinnnsjh2 G
T)S o7
4 y*c v
' 5.gka v>( [,g e
UNITED STATES 8,i g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
]./ l WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 "U V /
w.,,,,
t July 16,1986 MEMORANDUM FOR: Richard W. Krimm Assistant Associate Director Office of Natural and Technological Hazards Federal Emergency Management Agency FROM:
Edward L. Jordan, Director Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response Office of Inspection and Enforcement
SUBJECT:
FEMA REVIEW OF THE LILCO OFFSITE PLAN AND THE LILC0 RESPONSES TO THE FEMA EXERCISE REPORT FOR SHOREHAM The Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO), in a letter to H. R. Denton, NRC, dated June 20, 1986, submitted Revision 7 of the Shortham Nuclear Power Station Local Offsite Radiological Emergency Response Plan.
In a separate letter to H. R. Denton, NRC, dated June 20, 1986, LILCO submitted its responses to the FEMA Post-Exercise Report for the Shoreham Emergency Exercise of February 13, 1986.
We request that FEMA review Revision 7 of the Shoreham offsite plan and LILCO's responses to the FEMA exercise report as part of FEMA's ongoing efforts to assess the adequacy of offsite plans and preparedness for Shoreham. A copy of Revision 7 of the plan and LILCO's responses to the FEMA exercise report are enclosed. Note that LILC0 has provided copies of these submittals directly to the members of the FEMA Regional Assistance Committee (RAC).
c'2 Edwar
. Jordan, Director Divis n of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response Office of Inspection and Enforcement
Enclosures:
1.- Revision 7 of the LILC0
/
Offsite Plan dtd. 6/20/86
' If '
- 2. LILCO's Response to the FEMA Exercise Report dtd. 6/20/86 CONTACT: Rosemary T. Hogan, IE 492-4866
September 30, 1986
- it MEMORANDUM FOR: Richard W. Krimm -
Assistant Associate Director Office of Natural and Technological Hazards Federal Emergency Management Agency FRDM:
Edward L. Jordan, Director Division of Emergency Preparedness t
and Engineering Response l
Office of Inspection and Enforcement i
SUBJECT:
FEMA REVIEW OF REVISIONS 7 AND 8 TO THE LILCO OFFSITE PLAN l
l On July 16, 1986, I forwarded to FEMA Revision 7 of the LILCO offsite plan l
dated June 20, 1986, and LILCO's June.20, 1986 response to the FEMA exercise report, requesting that FEMA review these documents as part of FEMA's ongoing effort to assess the adequacy of offsite plans and preparedness for Shoreham.
On September-18, 1986 LILCO submitted Revision 8 of the Shoreham offsite plan in response to the FEMA Region Il post exercise assessment and to replace the t
Nassau Coliseum with' LILCO facilities as evacuee reception centers. LILCO pro-vided copies of Revision 8 directly to FEMA Region 11 and RAC members, as well as the NRC on that same date.
This is to request that FEMA. include Revision 8 in its review of the adequacy of Shoreham's offsite plan.
While the review of these revisions should'be completed as soon as possible to avoid any potential for impacting the licensing schedule, it is our understanding, based on discussions between you and Sheldon Schwartz, that FEMA will provide its findings to NRC not later than December 15, 1986.
6%el %st V
- t. L borde 1
Edward L. Jordan, Director Division of Energency Preparedness and Engineering Response Office of Inspection and Enforcement DISTRIBUTION _:
RWStarostecki, IE CRVan Niel IE JGPartlow, IE FKantor, IE BKGrimes, IE RTHogan, IE ELJordan, IE ESchristenbury, ELD SASchwartz. IE BMBordenick, ELD DBMatthews, IE TEMurley, RI KEPerkins, IE RM8ernero NRR JAAxelrad IE DCS E'
f RLo, NRR EPB R/F DEPER R/F l
CSEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE I
4>f0yER/IE L
- EPB/IE
- EPB/IE
- EPB/IE DD/DEPER/IE LJordan DJPerretti:sc FKantor DBMatthews SASchwartz 9/ /86 9/ /86 9/ /86 9/ /86 9/q/86
l f
. > >~g.y,.,z f
Federal Emergency Management Agency k
Washington, D.C. 20472
- O lT.0 h OCT 61986 MD40RANDUM EDR: Norman Steinlauf Acting Regional Director l
FDiA Region II (New York)
O
[
NCri:
Dave McLoughlin v
M Deputy Associate Director
\\)
State and Local Prograns and Support i
SUBJECT:
Review of the Iong Island Lighting Coupany (LIICO)
Transition Plan and LIIf0 Responses to the FD4A Exercise Report his is to request that your of fice conduct a full Regional Assistance Cm-mittee (RAC) review of Revisions 7 and 8 of the LIIf0 Transition Plan and of LIIf0's responses to FEMA's assessment of the February 13, 1986 exercise of Revision 6 of that plan.
In performing this reiriew, the RAC may have l
to assume, pendirg final resolution of the issue in the courts, that the authority necessa y to manage and implement the offsite plan exists.
Please verify any other assumptions, if any, that the RAC makes during this review process.
As you a e aware, the POclear Regulatory Conmission (NRC) invoked Section
~
II.4 of the tbvember 1,1980 NRC/FDiA Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on June 1,1983, by requestirg that FDiA conduct a review of five different plans prepared by LIIro. Wis request was later modified to pertain only to the LIICO Transition Plan and its revisions. On July 16, 1986, FEMA received a request from NRC, copy attached, to' conduct a review of Revision 7 of the Transition Plan and of LIICO's responses to FEMA's assessment of the February 13, 1986 exercise of Revision 6 of that plan. On October 6,1986, l
FEMA received an NRC request, copy attached, to include Revision 8 in its i
review.
It is our understanding, based on information from your staff, that copies of these documents haie alrea$y been delivered to the Region II office and to the RAC members.
l Based on recent corriersations between our staffs, we will infonn NRC that FEMA can provide a review by December 15, 1986. In order that we may comply.
with this delivery date, we will need the FDiA Region II report of the i
results of the RAC review by December 8,1986.
If you haie any questions, please feel free to call me.
Attactinent As Stated
(
l l
'I
,g#
UNITED STATES y
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION O
5
- j WASHINGTON, o. C 20555 k ;.'... + /
OCT 2 4 BB6 v.
B. Paul Cotter, Jr., Esq.
Chief Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
Washington, D.C.
20555 In the Matter of LONG ISLAND LIGliTING COMPANY 4
(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1) ~
Docket No. 50-322-OL-5 (EP Exercise)
Dear Judge Cotter:
We are in receipt of the October 22, 1986 motion of the Intervenors in this proceeding seeking rescission of your recent decision reconstituting the Licensing Board for the emergency planning exercise hearings in the Shoreham proceeding.
In this motion the Intervenors express certain concerns regarding this action.
Specifically, the Intervenors assert that the Chief Administrative Judge has identified no schedule conflicts necessitating this action and thus "there is no rational explanation for the.
. action."
Motion at 5.
The Staff for its part can appreciate certain of the Intervenors' initial apprehensions; however, on balance we do not believe that the motion-i is well grounded.
As we understand the issues, the three controlling concerns in any l
decision to reconstitute the Board hearing the emergency planning issues is to insure that:
(i) the Commission's desire that there be continuity between any i
newly appointed Board and the Board that previously considered and resolved the earlier emergency planning contentions be accommodated; (ii) the concerns j
previously expressed by the public in their limited appearance statements are fully understood and appreciated by any newly appointed Board; and (iii) the Commission's mandate that the exercise hearing be expedited is fully complied with.
As to the first two concerns, the continued presence of Judge Shon on both Boards and the existence of a complete transcript of all limited appearance statements offered in the exercise proceeding would appear to provide the necessary continuity.
And as to the last consideration, while we are not privy to all the factors that went into the decision to reconstitute the Board, we can only presume that the directive of the Commission was a key.
l element.
- Accordingly, given these factors, the Staff does not perceive a basis for joining the Intervenors' pending application.
Sincerely, M
Bernard M. Bordenick Counsel for NRC Staff ec: Service List l
l s
I l
-