ML20215M281
| ML20215M281 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 10/27/1986 |
| From: | Hii J COMSTOCK ENGINEERING, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20215M254 | List: |
| References | |
| OL, NUDOCS 8610300139 | |
| Download: ML20215M281 (43) | |
Text
,
MELATED CORRESPONDM Doutrte sNuc l
WT 29 gjg:47 OC L TIk'il V A' ?
'T b BR A j,Y "lCI UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of:
)
)
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
)
Docket Nos. 50-456
)
50-457 (Braidwood Nuclear Power
)
Station, Units 1 and 2)
)
REEUTTAL TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH HII 8610300139 861027 PDR ADOCK 0500 6
T
REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH HII Q.l. Please state your name, employer and your present position.
A.l. My name is Joseph Hii.
I am employed by L.K. Comstock as its QC Supervisor of Document Control
(" Vault Supervisor") at Commonwealth Edison Company's Braidwood Station.
Q.2. Please describe your employment history with Comstock at Braidwood.
A.2.
I was first employed by Comstock at Braidwood in August, 1980 as a document control clerk.
I became certified as a Quality Control Level I inspector in July of 1981, and attained certifications in CEA's and Configurations.
I became a Level II approximately one year later.
In August of 1983, I also became certified in weld inspections.
In mid-April, 1985, I took over Mr. Rick Saklak's position as QC Supervisor, and I continued in that position until April, 1986, when I because the Vault Supervisor.
l O.3. Please describe your current responsibilities as Vault j
Supervisor.
A. 3.
I am responsible for supervising the personnel and activities related to Comstock QC records and QC record turnover.
Q.4. What is the purpose of your testimony?
[.
A.4. The purpose of my testimony is:
(a) to describe my search for all Material Receipt Reports (MRR's) signed by Mr. John Seeders during the period August 8th through August 15th, 1984; (b) to describe my additional search for any MRR's nigned by Mr. Seeders on August 16th or 17th, 1984; (c) to respond to the testimony of others regarding a Form 19 checklist signed by Mr.
DeWald which is claimed to have more than a thousand welds documented on it; (d) to address my reason for visiting the NRC on March 29, 1985; (e) to respond to Mr. Puckett's testimony that I lost a test on which he supposedly scored 100%; and (f) to describe what types of documents I found in Mr. Saklak's desk drawers when I replaced him in April, 1985.
0.5. Please describe the searches which ycu performed for Mr. Seeders' MRR's.
A.5. As I mentioned above, I performed two sets of searches for the MRR's.
I first reviewed our Ccmstock QC Vault records for MRR's from August 8th through August 15th, 1985.
Later, counsel for CECO asked me to perform an j
additional search for MRR's signed by Mr. Seeders on August 16 or 17, 1985.
I performed that search as well.
I' l
i i
l l
L
In both cases, I performed my search in Comstock's Vault, the department for which I am personally responsible.
With respect to my earlier search, the ten sets of documents identified as Applicant's Exhibit 90 constitute the entirety of the MRR's for Comstock during the period of August 8-15, 1984.
All of them appear to bear Mr.
Seeders' signature.
Likewise, the three sets of documents attached as Hii-I constitute the entirety of the MRR's for Comstock during August 16 and 17, 1984.
They too, bear his signature.
Q.6. Please describe your knowledge, if any, of the exist-ence of a Form 19 checklist signed by Mr. DeWald which documents the inspection of more than a thousand welds.
A.6.
I have heard many rumors about the DeKald Checklist.
I have never seen it, and to the best of my knowledge, there is no such document.
In my capacity as Vault Supervisor, I am responsible for certain turnover activities.
One such responsibility is to ensure the ccmpleteness and acceptability of each QC document package being turned over to Commonwealth Edison.
In the course of these duties, I am certain that if such a document existed, I would have seen and remembered it.
O..
Q.7. Let me direct your attention now to the visit by 24 or so QC inspectors to the NRC on March 29, 1985.
Do you have any personal knowledge of such a visit?
i A. 7. Yes.
I was one of the group of inspectors who went to the NRC during our lunch break.
Q.8. How did you learn that the visit was to take place?
A.8.
I overheard Mr. Larry Bossong telling Mr. Franco Rolan that the NRC wanted anyone who might have had an incident with Rick Saklak to go over.
I had experienced an incident with Rick Saklak j
several years before.
Because I learned that Terry i
Gorman, who had witnessed my incident was going to visit the NRC, I decided to go as well.
I wanted to make sure that if my incident with Saklak came up, that j
it would be accurately described.
0.9. Please describe the incident you experienced with Mr.
Saklak.
A.9.
I can only recall now that it was in 1982 or early 1983, that he and I were standing in the vault area, and that Rick was yelling at me because I hadn't finished a project.
I recall trying to explain to him the problems I was having with it, and that he kept saying "Do it, do it."
I do not recall the nature of the project, although I did recall it in March, 1985.
The next day, I pulled Rick aside and talked to 1
I
M him about the incident and the problems I was having with the project.
We discussed both the incident and the project, and resolved them both during that discussion.
Q.10.Did this incident cause you to fear Mr. Saklak thereafter?
A.10.No, it did not cause me to feel intimidated by Rick, nor did it cause me to fear him.
He did have a temper, and I felt he lacked sensitivity in his dealings with personnel.
Nevertheless, I always found Rick to be quality-conscious and dedicated.
Q.11.Did you observe the circumstances underlying the March 29 group visit to the NRC?
A.11.I observed that the visit appeared to be triggered by an incident the previous day between Saklak and Snyder.
Although I was not a witness to the incident, I did hear about it frcm other inspectors.
I also observed that tension and hostility existed between inspectors and management before our visit to the NRC.
I experienced some of that hostility myself.
I don't mean to suggest that the incident between Snyder and Saklak wasn't serious, since I didn't see it.
I do believe that some individuals saw the incident as an opportunity to make themselves appear mere powerful than management.
Q.12.You mentioned in your prior answer that you " experienced" hostility from some inspectors.
What did you mean by that?
A.12.I was one of the members of the voting body who was opposed to unionization.
I did not try to hide that fact.
Among other incidents during the course of the t
l
.. 1 i
union' organizing effort in the late summer of 1984, the tires of my car were slashed in the site parking lot on several different occasions.
I was not the only one to whom this happened.
The atmosphere eased for a short time after the union vote in November.
By early 1985, I saw that the organizers and others in favor of the union appeared to j
become impatient because the vote had not been ratified.
Just a few weeks before our visit to the NRC, the union i
staged a Saturday sick-out.
I was one of the handful of OC inspectors who nevertheless reported to work that day.
The inspectors who had supported the sick-out made clear their hostility to me after this incident.
l This led me to believe that they viewed me as siding i
j with management.
i
}
Q.13.You also mentioned that you observed hostility and i
tension between the QC inspectors and management.
To what were you referring?
)
A.13.In addition to a general atmosphere of tension, several l
i specific incidents led me to that observation.
- First, i
l the car vandalism I referred to earlier was experienced i
t by several members of Comstock management as well.
4 Another specific incident was the sick-out, which I also referred to earlier.
1 1
l t
1 1
4 r
i
.~. _ _
i.
Q.14. Turning now to the topic of Mr. Worley Puckett, are 4-you familiar with that portion of his testimony that i
he had taken a test which was subsequently lost, and that you had told him that he had scored 100% on it?
i i
A.14.Yes.
i 0.15.Please describe your knowledge, if any, about the j
substance of Mr. Puckett's testimony.
l A.15.I have no recollection of such an incident ever taking i
place.
I do not recall a test being lost or disap-j pearing.
Additionally, I did not grade Mr. Puckett's tests, practical or written.
I would not have known what his score was on any test unless someone else had graded it and then told me the results.
Finally, I have no recollection of ever telling Mr. Puckett about any score he might have received.
Q.16. Finally, please describe the types of documents which you found in Mr. Saklak's desk drawers when you replaced him as QC Supervisor.
A.16.One of the first tasks assigned to me by Mr. Simile was i
j to clean out the desk drawers that I was to use.
When I took over, the drawers were locked.
I remember i
j seeing files of carbon copies of speed memos (generally I
l QC inspector requests for time-off, and memos reflecting excessive no pay status) and copies of memos dealing with trend analyses, etc. all of which were on Comstock i
l letterhead.
I kept those materials which I felt I i
would need as the new OC Supervisor; the rest I gave to Mr. Simile.
4
8-Q.17.Are you aware of what is commonly referred to as Rick Saklak's Pearl Harbor file?
A.17.Yes, I am.
Q.18.Please describe the circumstances under which you first became aware of it.
A.18.The first time I saw it was in 1982, shortly after Rick became QC Supervisor.
It was a folder marked with the words " Pearl Harbor", and Rick kept it in his desk.
Q.19.Did you have the opportunity to become aware of its contents?
A.19.Yes.
All I can recall now is that I saw copies of craft installation reports which Rick was keeping to show Mr. Frank Rolan that they were not being filled out properly, and copies of other " construction problem" documents which Rick would periodically bring to Mr.
Rolan's attention.
Q.20.Was the Pearl Harbor file in Mr. Saklak's desk when you became QC Supervisor?
A.20.No.
Q.21.Does this complete your testimony?.
A.21.Yes, t
i l
l l
l i
I e
e~r,--_m,---.-r.-,.,,m---c.m-m,i
,e,-,,
,cc-,-
-c
-,._.,,.e
.,,-.,,w.--.--,-2---.,-.--,--.--.----v..
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of:
)
)
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
)
Docket Nos. 50-456
)
50-457 (Braidwood Nuclear Power
)
Station, Units 1 and 2)
)
IsTTACHMENT I TO REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH HII
ll S
K R
A M
E K
R S
a wh Xt z
$m$
h C
E f
S s
C O
. M QEM T
PP 9
OEC Y
EC L
TA N
ADO O
C E
C E
E
'./T vTA u AS SN E
R U
R R
M E
n e
5 F
f A
a
/
E 2
2 R
6 n
E N
N O
c R
N O
I n
T b
b MP
/>
A F
EI l
o 6
TR l
4 W
m E
IC A
S ED d
e V
O 8
u E
0 p
T i
t D
W e
Y E
h-EV AE
/-
x TI L
L
/
bC
- l E
B s
8 R
O o
6 G
W k
e
/
r T
?
a
~G
~
S
/
!ii l
l
k 78~)$ / 7 6
MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT RECEIVING AND INSPECTION REPORT
~
CECO ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION MRR #
DATE:
eY- /d - b SHIPPER L' A / "
t s < e' ORIGIS1JNe*s',lb' AY DATE f' f~d'4 CARRIER
/
5-PRO #
RR R#
l lS $ h*
CO NTR. R EC'V -
(
ff' CECO P.O.
Z s-NSSS P.O.
O CECO REC N4 hu SPEC OR OTHER 000.
2 78I PREP. BY (M RC)
(#h c e s3 STORAGE LOCATION h 6d I
~
STORAGE LEVEL C.or0)
/
SHELF LIFE.
b l MONTHS)
D (g' l
(Indicate only if '1imited)
AECEIPT INSPECTION: (SEE PAGE 2)
EQUIP. OR
/ 45 e A INSP HOLD TAG IDENT.#
DESCRIPTION g
5 5
b Eb N
$ /1. c 5 (h'drfca) 0hp j
ty l
.h.
Cfass 1 h' D
8 ** ~-
/,
g 05 ff ]f
.d ;J
% f3( @ j C hj $
I' I -[
J.;
f
. f' t.*b UL js C., liY ASE,Udas.0E U..unt.'OOD STATION
- CODE CLASS.
- 1. SAFETY RELATED NON ASME SEC.ll!
2.NON SAFETY RELATED
- 3. ASME SEC. lli
- 4. RELIABILITY RELATED Occument Review QA Acceptance Sta. Cat.
SL Db -
C JC Fy 0
Cert.cf Conf. By ASME Data Report By: C/J dix'a. a C fe. F.j QA Acceptance:
Complete Document d
- a. Intenm M/8. h-F A* - f 4 Package By MT..
'N t:. Fina' O I
~ S i *J#N*
^
ff']
G,
'E l
F O R M Q.P. 71.1 i
Datt (107 83) Rev.10 Page 1 of 2.
I
R 75f /7 d,
'N MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT RECEIVING AND INSPECTION REPORT CECO ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION MRR #
DATE:
Y- /d - U SHIPPER e# S / 74 4 v 4 e' ORIGidhhkM[e* db OATE 8-f ~d'I CARRIER
[-
b PRO #
RR R#
CECO P.O.
/ h 78 3 Y' M
CO NTR. R EC'V
/
+-
NSSS P.O.
8 CECO RECI
[^
PREP. BY (MRC) c% hu f ee e SPEC OR OTHER 000.
2 7II STORAGE LOCATION 6d I STORAGE LEVEL C, or 0)
~
N/h SHELF LIFE (MONTHS)
(Indicate only if '1imited")
RECEIPT INSPECTION: (SEE PAGE 2)
EQUIP. OR
/ 45 o X INSP HOLO TAG IDENT. #
DESCRIPTION g
5 45
%d Ed a
=
U o
z cc c2 z
m: z zz S iz. e 1 Cuer/ cad felaf.s t
- z. e
/
kg Class 1 i.'
I 1
?
5 [T wp.,
4 l hr
?
'l
. G,1 9FM@EdOMMP a
i q('
rlJ 4 I ; -.
E
_.. _. 3 C.'AUTY ASSUda.CE EMAIDWOOO STATION
- CODE CLASS:
- 1. SAFETY RELATED NON ASME SEC.lli 2.NON SAFETY RELATED
- 3. ASME SEC. lli
- 4. RELIABILITY RELATED Document Review QA Acceptance Sta.C t.
Cert.of Conf.By QL h
$&f2. u, F Je gy 0
ASME Data Report By: t///4
/f/)//c ;d, f.fc.F y QA Acceptance:
Complete 0ccument d
- a. Interim
/0//$ne F 'l M '/
Package By M
- b. Final D/ 4c..~ V M g/
'QA Supt, Date F O R M Q.P. 71.1 Date (107 83) Rev.10 Page 1 of 2
I k 2T/7h
'-j MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT RECElVING AND INSPECTION REPORT CECO ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION MRR #
DATE:
b /d ~ b O RIGird. A> /d' 5 /r' AUDATE
/*- f/-dV t *5 e i 'r
.1 a ' '
SHIPPER CARRIER
[
b PRO 4 RR R#
Y//
CECO P.O.
/h783h CONTR REC'V 4k NSSS P.O.
O CECO RECI M[^
2 7 IO~
~
STORAGE LEVEL C, or 0)
C STORAGE LOCATION 6 c' N/ '}
SHELF LIFE (MONTHS)
}
(Indicate only if 'iimited")
RECEIPT INSPECTION: (SEE PAGE 2)
EQUIP. OR
/ b. o X INSP HOLD TAG IDENT.#
DESCRIPTION g
5
$ i 2. e $ 0n'r'l;d hel.tj $
l
- t. y
{
D k
C /OS li g
kf f Mi n vsw t
r
- ..c.n.m.vp
- /-
a r m m m y> m s l
- \\
Y L l_--
jl.*
kbb[ohNTUi$
' CODE CLASS: 1 SAFETY RELATED NON.ASME SEC. lli 2.NON SAFETY RELATED
- 3. ASME SEC. Ill 4 RELIABILITY RELATED i
Document Review QA Acceptance Sta.C t.
Cart. of Conf.By b b/1 m # * #y O
ASME Dats Report By: t//M
/W)/2 ul F 70.Py OA Acceptance:
1/1//2 nm F-Aaf4 7
Completa 0ccument d
- a. Interim
~
PackageBy E,
v b Fina!
4 I
! a.' i**h 7%/4-Q A Supt.
Date 7
F O R M Q.P. 71.1 Date t107 83) Rev.10 Page 1 of 2
R E CEIPT INSPECTION CHECKL)",7
. ' 't. r, E g g C re 5y 2 l
L,,a e..,. :. -:c a i
.) a:neret a-is Satt. t,entaminants) l "l l l
- ..,F., :Ragh Ha9d'ing
/
G",
,10amageo Containers.Shif ted Load) l9l l se e
~
hemys-ca; Damage
-M
[
/
lYll
- tBroken, Deformed. Cracked Parts)
/ -
Inspected By
/( u[
- 8. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS i
I 1.
RR No. Affaed to Material / Equipment (See e 1, Upper lef t Corner, For MR R No.)
l lM
- 2. ld 9r.t.I.C a t:09..
I'f'Q s (Af f ard, Legible) l l l l
- 3. Protective Covers / Seats I
(in Place, Intact) l l l l
- 4. Preservatives / Desiccants / Inert Gas / Lubricants
[
(Per Sete instructions) l l l l l
S. Dimensional / Workmanship
(,t., e,
,. ' *
- I' f* IF ' ' #? m t. l. J j
(Random Check, Per Mfr's. Drawings)
F
a-
.hp
- { Ll _- l
- 6. Electrical insulation Check (Per Site Instructions l
l
- 7. Packagin
,eptable f or Storage l ll s
8 of ted Connections Tight
//
/ [
l lN "SEE ATTACHED CHECK LIST" C, inspected by/
V ' M A 0 ate # 8 [ [
((
/
C. DOCUMENTATION
- 1. Certificate of Conformance l@ l l
- 2. Certificate of Compliance l l l
- 3. Certified Material Test Repcrt l
l l
- 4. Other (Specify) l l l D. SPECIAL INSPECTION 4
l l l Specify l
l l 1/ 24
""~
in,,ec,ed,,:
m.me,
gyff
.,e, Page 2 of 2
1 BG-3 Revision 8 ffj$i.(([.IM*f.ifr.I'A,g:3; gy April 4,1984 Page 13 of 26 EXHIBIT C MRR No.
Electrical Physical Characteristics (B)
Page1 ACC. REJ. N/A 1.
Is the MRR number affixed to each item or each lot?
2.
Are identification markings affixed to the items and legible?
3.
Are the identification markings traceable to the shipping manifest or supplied documentation?
4.
Are protective covers or seals in-place and intact?
5.
Are there any preservative coatings present and, if so, still functional?
Are there desiccants / inert gas purges present,KK+ 8-v*r 6.
and are they functional?
IVI 1S8t -i
,:in iCOD
~ '
(
, 0019P)
BG-3 Revision 8 April 4,1984 Page 14 of 26 EXHIBIT C Electrical Physical Characteristics Page 2 ACC. REJ. N/A 7.
If the device is fluid filled or has a lubrication reservoir, has the orientation of the device been such as to preclude damage or leakage?
l/.'.
8.
Are lugs and tern inal blocks pe~r CECO /S & L Standards?
9.
If welding is present, is it consistent with standard electrical construction?
10.
Are painting or galvanizing in an acceptable condition for storage? (subjective review) 11.
Are edges free of burrs and smooth?
.s i 3
~,. ' '.
I $lv.
..; S : 4
_ n..,,
., ~. i ts, v v v v g 39p)
BG-3 Revision 8 April 4,1984 Page 15 of 26 EXHIBIT C Electrical Physical Characteristics Page 3 ACC. REJ. N/A 12.
Is fastening hardware tight and consistent with good workmanship practices?
(Note any abnormal conditions, missing bolts, nut, washers, etc.)
13.
If there are any special site requirements for electrical insulation testing, has OAD performed these or been notified?
[ pp-9 9 7.:
, g, p {>
gg
.. ; i ;.=
UstL (List whom and when notified
.)
Results of test:
l l
l 14.
Is there rust, oil, scale, or dirt present in amounts that may impair the usefulness of l
the part?
15.
Are dimensions of rolled or sheared steel stock within the applicable AISC guidelines?
16.
Are dimensions of fabricated enclosures Qunction boxes, etc.) as ordered? y a. NO.
. n. -s (0019P)
-i
^nn
,: m v. t GU J
BG-3 Revision 8 April 4,1984 Page 16 of 26 EXHIBIT C Electrical Physical Characteristics Page 4 17.
Are all cable ends sealed for outside storage?
18.
Are Cable Reels standing in an upright position at the time of arrival?
19.
Are there are any gouges or any damage to cable jacket?
COMMENTS:
- e. y,' '.
t-
. ' ?. t ?
..e..
Calibrated Equipment Used if Applicable
- Record objective evidence for any measurements, dimensional checks, fluid levels, weld aspects, etc. taken during the receipt in-spection.
If calibrated equipment is used for any inspection, record 1.D.
number and calibration due date.
' Inspected by: -
//
15844 Date:
(0019P) B RA J/CO J
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION CONTROL DIVISION CERTITICATE OF CONTORMANCE IN 11211-CGC MTE 8/9/84 CENERAL ORDER No.
197234 S&L2755 CUSTCHER P.O. No.
SPECIFIGTION
- ggy, PROJECT Braid Wood #1 DRAWING REY.
EQUIPMENT / MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Sizo 1 overload NUMBER OF PIECES 28 CUSTOMER TAG No.
S & L Snee. 2755 REMARKS:
Sim to AA13A (Sr IN 11210903 - P.O. 42-916845)
QUALITY CONTORMANCE TO APPLICABLE CODES AND EPECITICATION:
Control Division - Fayetteville N. C. Plant Q. A. Program
'd L
i j.,
DEVIATION NOTICE (S) 1 x
iNONE
[
] APPLICABLE QDRs ARE LISTED BELOW 3Y QDR NUMBER WE HEREBY CERTITY THAT THE ITEMS LISTED ABOVE EAVE BEEN MANUTACTURED AND FABRICATED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE QUALITY REQUIRIMENTS OF THE CODES / STANDARDS /
SPECITICATIONS ITEMIZED ABOVE AND ALL OTHER CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS LISTED IN THE CONTRACT 197234 RECORDS HAVE BEEN/WILL BE (CIRCLE ONE)
TRANSMITTED TO
'\\ /j C O
,\\(*
If.I ' * '
- 3 BT (DATE).
\\
s
- L
't BP.A Q.TOOD
)'i b I h
/0N Y PREFARID BT Michael Li/LW bt't J ArrRovED sf (QUALITY ASST %ueCI ENGINEII)
(QUALITT Programs MGR) t
1" 9.V 18
- 0. -
./
Lou White - Westingbouse ElectricCCorp.
IN CORRE$PON0 LNG $HOW OUR 2900 Doc Bennett Road o'cta "o a caTE Fayettev114e,::C 23306 PP #25654 8-10-84 av
__itews CusT0wta s on swProita's atsgage(g ano caf t C0 pits Or inv. TO COPIES OF 5'm To
~
2 4
- 4.. 4 F-
- $ HIPPED TO Commonwealth Edison Company o
FF #25654 nraidwood Unit 1 Project Construction Dept East of Rt. 53. 1 1/2 miles so. of Et. 113 Braidwood, IL 60407
=*a= < >c pac = ast
. +.......
?+?+?????.
Atta:
M.J. Wallace F. O. B.
Cuan6L YaANSP. TO Tan C0CC ncw 10 in89 AND nouTE PREPAfD C OLLE CT W ATERiaL LOCaff D su DaTE waTE elat YO St SMiPPED PEG. #0. 4
- E IGHT I ITtu I Qua=Tity I
10 E N ' ' ' 'C A T I C *d
28 Size 1 Overload Eclays - Class 1E For Braidwood #1 5
l l l l i
w N
N i
- n. y
. [Es 1
4 M
N N
N N
N N
N I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I l
l l
l l
l l
I,
a.
t '
- i l s si 1 L 12 g
,e.o.
C N.~ ;! b. t V V '-
M I
N H
N
}
l l
1 EtaSON Fon sniPPig6
- 'm #
D/A 8 h_yhi!h_M,hlh
.0.......T gcowaT10m
-'c nouTE DATE PART FtmAL P PO. COLL.
t aP. W/8. no.
' PP #25654 8-10-84
~ '
15 eW ima.
CECO Q.A.
RECEIPT INSPECTION CHECKLIST
- l.,
Ch,$ h,
- ' A Is.I$ Er r r,
A.
SHIPPING DAMAGE ACC REJ N/A 1.
Corrosion / Exposure / Fire (Weathered Road Salt, Contaminats) 2.
Tie-Down Failure / Rough Handling (Damaged Containers, Shifted Load) 3.
Physical Damage (Broken. Deformed, Cracked Parts)
/
4.
Inspection Performed Concurrent with Cognizant PCD Engineer or Designee
/
5.
Inspection Performed after cognizant PCD Engineer or Designee 6.
Inspection Performed Prior to y
PCD Engineer's or Designee v
l hl h 0 ~3Ch'f n
p(, l/;n' wI <.
l Inspected By:
/ h > r /-
A Date:
d l
R. A. VIG;;cccyg (0158P) l i
BG-3 Revision 8 April 4,1984 Page 13 of 26 EXIIIBIT C MRR No.
/9N Electrical Physical Characteristics (B)
Page 1 ACC. REJ. N/A 1.
Is the MRR number affixed to each item or
/
each lot?
s.
.. i' 2.
Are identification markings affixed to the
/
items and legible?
l 3.
Are the idartification markings traceable to
/
the shipping manifest g supplied documentation?
4.
Are protective covers or seals in-place and intact?
l 5.
Are there any preservative coatings present and, if so, still functional?
/
l 6.
Are there desiccants / inert gas purges present, and are they functional?
l (0019P) l
BG-3 Revision 8 April 4,1984 Page'14 of 26 EXHIBIT C Electrical Physical Characteristics Page 2 ACC. REJ. N/A 7.
If the device is fluid filled or has a
/
lubrication reservoir, has the orientation of the device been such as to preclude damage or leakage?
,%. U
.,' I 8.
Are lugs and terminal blocks per CECO /S & L Standards?
9.
If welding is present, is it consistent with standard electrical construction?
10.
Are painting or galvanizing in an acceptable condition for storage? (subjective review) 11.
Are edges free of burrs and smoot,h?
(0019P) l
BG-3 Revision 8 April 4,1984 Page 15 of 26 EXHIBIT C Electrical Physical Characteristics Page 3 ACC. REJ. N/A 12.
Is fastening hardware tight and consistent
[
with good workmanship practices?
(Note any abnormal conditions, missing bolts, nut, washers, etc.)
y 13.
If there are any special site requirements for electrical insulation testing, has OAD performed these or been notified?
(List whom and when notified
.)
Results of test:
M 14.
Is there rust, oil, scale, or dirt present in i
amounts that may impair the usefulness of the part?
15.
Are dimensions of rolled or sheared steel stock within the applicable AISC guidelines?
16.
Are dimensions of fabricated enclosures Qunction boxes, etc.) as ordered?
(0019P)
BG-3 Revision 8 April 4,1984 Page 16 of 26 EXHIBIT C Electrical Physical Characteristics Page 4 17.
Are all cable ends sealed for outside storage?
18.
Are Cable Reels standing in an upright
/
position at the time of arrival?
19.
Are there are any gouges or any damage to cable f/
jacket?
COMMENTS:
c; V
i Calibrated Equipment Used if Applicable l
- Record objective evidence for any measurements, dimensional checks, fluid levels, weld aspects, etc. taken during the receipt in-spection.
l If calibrated equipment is used for any inspection, record I.D.
l number and calibration due date.
j>J// g, 6Ik
[
)
/
Inspected by: / ac7 i -
/
Date:
b /b-[f (0019P)
}\\
j,l 2'i:t t7 MATERIAL ANO EQUIPMENT RECElVING AND INSPECTION REPORT CECO ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION 2.5% g g-MRR #
OATE:
' /$ ' '
SHIPPER Se c
' - l))ec H / C %
ORIGIN.
ko~ lo n. DATE Y 15'N r
CARRIE R
N CF i
PRO #
27/'O R CAR #,
CECO P.O.
d
/ I/
CO NTR. R EC'V
/
ll NSSS P.O.
//3 CECD REC'V /
O N$ /
PREP. BY (MRC) /
d c,7 STORAGE LOCATION 5 t/ I
~Y d STORAGE LEVE C, or 0)
SHELF LIFE
/A (MONTHS)
(Indicate only if '1imited")
/
RECEIPT INSPECTION: (SEE PAGE 2)
EQUIP. OR
/ hg INSP HOLD TAG IDENT.#
DESCRIPTION g
,h 5
5 5
Eb
!b N
NC. E'bfr l bic lll'b ^*
7 b - C C C C C - 42 2 ~ 2 C$- /
i
/ 6 / 2--
Y /,'.[ /d 7'
i, v.
v U
\\\\
ES 2 0 G84 d
. ui L
CJAUTY ASSUrkt.CE BRAIDWOOD STATION
- CODE CLASS: 1 -SAFETY RELATED NON ASME SEC. l11 2 NON-SAFETY RELATED
(
3 ASME SEC.lli
- 4. RELIABILITY RELATE 0 Document Review QA Acceptance Sta. Const.
Acceptance
$ ~ /7'9[
TtW
?/M An, e ti.e y G
Cert. cf Conf. 8, l
ASME Data Report By: A/A /M//, m& C-ugy QA Acceptance:
Complete 0acument
- e. Interim
// w 9-2/ -8 '/
Package By M
l' f* T
- b. Fine!
/7.W4 h %'6-tF m
QA Supr.
Date i
"'- ' " F O R M Q.P. 7 1.1 Dats (107 83) Rev.10 Page 1 of 2 l
\\*
7-RECEIPT INSPECTION CHECKLIST A. SHIPPING D AM AGE
~
- 1. Qosion/ Exposure / Fire g(Weathered. Road Salt, Contaminants)
[M l l 2n
.s m
j W 2..'It0cwn Failure / Rough Handling
/
00
%sged Containers. Shifted Load) lM l l 3.
sical Damage
/
ll./[ l l ctB{oken, Deformed. Cracked Parts)
/
s Inspected By B. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS 1.
RR No. Affixed to Material / Equipment (See e 1. Upper left Corner, For MR R No.)
l lM
- 2. Identification ings (Affixed, Legible) l l l l
- 3. Protective Covers / Seals (in Place. Intact) l l l l
- 4. Preservatives / Desiccants / inert Gas / Lubricants (Per Site Instructions) l l l l
- 5. Dimensional / Workmanship (Random Check, Per Mft's. Drawings) l l ll
- 6. Electrical Insulation Check (Per Site Instructions l l ll
- 7. Packagin eptable for Storage l ll s
8 oited Connections Tight
/ //
//
l lN "SEE ATTACHED CHECK LIST" Inspected by M d&Me Date #//([
l
[
C. DOCUMENTATION
.g,
- l. Certificate of Conformance l Vl ll
- 2. Certificate of Compliance l l l
- 3. Certified Material Test Report
' 7 l l l
- 4. Other (Specify)
I)b l l l D. SPECIAL INSPECTION Specify l l l l l l Remarks:
Inspected By:
(Name and 0410lA g /gff
//
- 2.. g Page 2 of 2
O ??C/7 A MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT RECEIVING AND INSPECTION REPORT CECO ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION MRR #
DATE:
[ ' /d ~ d N SHIPPER 86
/'7 4 (hse ORIGIN M @ kht/s //e
('0 ATE 8 ~ '/ ~I Y CAR RIE R PRO # 7 78-3 7750 -4RR CAR #
N 3
CONT A. R ECY CECO P.O.
g f/
l NSSS P.O.
CEC 0 RECV
2 78 I~
PREP. BY (M RC) h u yam STORAGE LOCATION 6 f' 3 - Y
~[_
STORAGE LEV
,C, or D) b SHELF LIFE h
(MONTHS)
(Indicate only if 'iimited")
RECEIPT INSPECTION: (SEE PAGE 2)
EQUIP. OR INSP HOLD TAG IDENT. #
DESCRIPTION g
5 5
b Eb b
Nb N
$ I Z. < 1 0 L4rNt'ad N4l.S }
gf Cla ss 1r
\\
l t
i j;-
f tb #E6.<
n I$, h h,-
'2 f, p 1
61516(h 1 a
- i 5
?(
QCg _ i FGb $ s V) m ar.,ya"
%g
~
- CODE CLASS:
- 1. SAFETY RELATED NON ASME SEC. llt 2.NON SAFETY RELATED
Cert.of Conf.By l?)1 h m, G-P fV 0
ASME Data Report By: A//,1 /// /Tc 3 m F-3/-Say GA Acceptance:((hdm
- a. Interim
- -1/-#'1 Complete Document Package By
- b. Final 4
QA Supr.
Date F O R M Q.P. 71.1 Date ll 07 83) Rev.10 Page 1 of 2
RECEIPT INSPECTIDN CHECKLIST A. SHIPPING D AMAGE g
bQ5 16tosion/ Exposure / Fire
$ aya O
gaathered, Road Salt, Contaminants) l9 l l 2.
Down Failure / Rough Hand!ing
/
00
'g)amaged Containers, Shif ted lead) lTl l tf3
/
y.q 3.
ical Damage
/
elT1l oken, Deformed Cracked Parts) e Inspected By B. PHYSICAL CH AR ACTERISTICS 1.
RR No. Affixed to Material / Equipment (See e 1. Upper lef t Corner, For MRR No.)
l lM
- 2. Identification,
ings (Affixed Legible) l l l l
- 3. Protective Covers / Seats (In Place, Intacti l l l l
- 4. Preservatives / Desiccants / Inert Gas / Lubricants r e :;
(Per Site Instructions) i"##
j{Yl l
.stE,j i,
,, - w :, -
- 5. Dimensional / Workmanship l l ll (Random Check, Per Mf t's. Drawings)
- 6. ElectricalInsu'ation Check (Per Site Instructions l l ll
- 7. Packagin eptable for Storage l ll 8 of ted Connections Tight
[ //,
/ //
l y
"SEE ATTACHED CHECK LIST" O Inspected by / % M M # M ate [///
C. DOCUMENTATION
- 1. Certificate of Conformance l Vl ll
- 2. Certificate of Compliance l l l
- 3. Certified Material Test Report l l l
- 4. Other (Specif )
l l l f
D. SPECIAL INSPECTION l l l Specify l l IV Remarks:
inspected By:
[ /g i
l (Name and D[
N/[*ct 4-J/ fy i
\\\\
Page 2 of 2
BG-3 Revision 8 April 4,1984 Page 13 of 26 EXHIBIT C MRR No.
/_57f/
Electrical Physical Characteristics (B)
Page1 ACC. REJ. N/A
- 1. -
Is the MRR number affixed to each item or each lot?
2.
Are identification markings affixed to the items and legible?
3.
Are the identification markings traceable to the shipping manifest g supplied documentation?
- .~u
.?
4.
Are protective covers or seals in-place and intact?
5.
Are there any preservative coatings present and, if so, still functional?
6.
Are there desiccants / inert gas purges present, and are they functional?
MRR.FO.
1 a a.s 1 BRA DWOOJ
BG-3 Revision' 8 April 4,1984 Page 14 of 26 EXHIBIT C Electrical Physical Characteristics Page 2 ACC. REJ. N/A 7.
If the device is fluid filled or has a lubrication reservoir, has the orientation of the device been such as to preclude damage or leakage?
8.
Are lugs and terminal blocks per CECO /S & L Standards?
, - :. c e,7 e;,
9.
If welding is present, is it consistent with standard electrical construction?
10.
Are painting or galvanizing in an acceptable condition for storage? (subjective review) 11.
Are edges free of burrs and smooth?
MRR. NO.
.,31 3
.!0,1000 (0019P)
BG-3 Revision 8 April 4,1984 Page 15 of 26 EXHIBIT C Electrical Physical Characteristics Page 3 ACC. REJ. N/A 12.
Is fastening hardware tight and consistent with good workmanship practices?
(Note any abnormal conditions, missing bolts, nut, washers, etc.)
13.
If there are any special site requirements for electrical insulation testing, has OAD performed these or been notified? [
- g';j;; y P
s:
(List whom and when notified
.)
Results of test:
14.
Is there rust, oil, scale, or dirt present in amounts that may impair the usefulness of the part?
15.
Are dimensions of rolled or sheared steel stock within the applicable AISC guidelines?
16.
Are dimensions of fabricated enclosures (junction boxes, etc.) as ordered?
3R NO.
33~l (0019P) o j g g t/.] [ Q ]
~
l BG-3 Revision 8 April 4,1984 i
Page 16 of 26 EXHIBIT C Electrical Physical Characteristics Page 4 17.
Are all cable ends sealed for outside storage?
18.
Are Cable Reels standing in an upright position at the time of arrival?
19.
Are there are any gouges or any damage to cable Jacket?
COMMENTS:
u Calibrated Equipment Used if Applicable
- Record objective evidence for any measurements, dimensional l
checks, fluid levels, weld aspects, etc. taken during the receipt in-I spection.
If calibrated equipment is used for any inspection, record I.D.
number and calibration due date.
M RR. NC'. inspec,ed 3y: M.d[
f&
15851 Date:
(M19PB RA JWOO J
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION CONTROL DIVISION CERTIFICATE OF CONTORMANCE IN 11211-CGC GENERAL ORDER NO.
=TE 8/9/84 197234 S&L2755 CUSTCMER P.O. 30.
SPECITICATION
- ggy, Braid Wood #1 g
DMM E
Size 1 Overload EQUIPMENT / MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 75 NUMBER OF PIECES CUSTCHER TAG N0.
S & L Spec. 2755 RD%RKS:
Sim to AA13A (S# IN 11210903 - P. O. 42-91684N)
QUALITY CONTORMANCE TO APPLICABLE CODES AND SPECITICATION:
g g.
DEVIATION NOTICE (S)
[
x 1NONE
[
IAPPLICABLE QDRs ARE LISTED BELOW 3Y QDR NLMBER WE EEREBY CERTITY THAT THE ITDtS LISTED ABOVE HAVE BEEN MANUTACTURED AND FABRICATED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE QUALITY REQUIREMDITS OF THE CODES / STANDARDS /
SPECITICATIONS ITIMIZED ABOVE AND ALL ODLER CUSTOMER REQUIRIMENTS LISTED IN THE CONTRACT 197234 RICORDS HAVE BEEN/WILL BE (CIRCLE ONE) 11ANSHITTED TO
=
cure).
MRR. NO.
, 5 e. a 1 BRAl0WOOQ
)1
% ho[h pagyAggp gy Michael Li/LW LR/
APPROVED M (QUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEIR)
(QUALITY Programs MGR)
"L" O R D E R 18
,om,,T -
in CORRESPONDING SHow CUR raou Westingbouse Electric Corp. Lou White 2900 Doc Bennett Road
Fayattov11la,-NC 28306
= aaeaea c o s t o g a f o str P*T t a. s a u t a t = c t.% c.i t T gaus Cortts or s/m To CoPits or inv. To
- SHIPPED TO
. ++++..,+
Commonwealth Edison Sompany
!**!!!!!!i 0 Nd Braidwood Unit 1 PP #25353 Project (lpnatruction Dept
!!!k!!!!!!
East of Rt. 53. i 1/2 miles So. of Rt. 11 n,.. w_ _a vt anAnv
.........i, u... c.r.c r.c r.u - - - -
.. +++,.++
++++++++**
i,,e.
w e vait..
F. o. S.
CM A8GE T A Am sP. To Tas Coot Moe 76 sWP Aho R6sfi '
PREPalo COLLECT
~~
M ATEReal loc ATEo IN caf t uaf gesaL To OE SMIPPED
... o.. w r i.. T iTru i ou..T i v, i icc ~ ~ic a tieu.~ c ce sc urio~
ii 1
75 Size 1 Overload Ralays - Class 1B for Braidwood #1 e
r
(
l.
MR..NO.
y 1
'h9
>T
.p m.
/ V saaeen sea eessessm6
-mer
- d..
a /n a o/A e
- ma am a p.
I a
e=
1 M
Ii HHHMNHHMHHH H HHH H ISI H h H
H H
M M H H H H q
H H
H H
L 6Soss wil6MT m
M M
M k
X X
X Iont auf. PPD.
i wenT mo. amo safs '
raa f.
rimal e Po.
C oL L.
sur. w/0. no.
c,a I,on7n smi' n ou f'c '
s.
rr Assas 8-10-84 G..
6 em -
CONSIGNEE INVOICE NUMBER Q' CONS 0uD#7ED g
COPY
/RE/CNT&#FS Cf&V s.
,,,,,,,,,,s wu.e t tOUTP. NUMNR DATE Oe'GrN CPetytNut A;vANCg atYOND DE S r:N A;ios OI
'3 9 r. c n e,-
l CON 5cNes 5-ne e 5 NU-u =
COMM0f4WEAllh E-
..ia BRAIDWOOD UNI'l
*('*"'
'"'t 4 ' 5 "o o ^ ' "o
"*co"4 i
EE CO!1 SIGNER i{
4 r.R A I DWO O f # P I L @ '-
~
- . r.a a tt 10 NESTINGHOUGE E!.FC' inctR.'l 3c m 1
P BOX 64"O9 8 l
" A Y E T T E V I L L F,ttC'.:P:~
7.- Q t; i
.g,
- PC5. i MM DESCRIPTION OF ARflCLE$ AND M ARK 5 l WEIGHT l RATE l
TOTAL CHARGES BRALC WOO )o 1
6m z..
o.m.m.
- e..m..
Cf.Eri1 r I'
.. E :
.. 'Z.
ci'U.
- . ?
r 1
TO'rAi
- 0.
- :0 PPO h.$1, f }d8$ f O
C0h41:
.'W O v..
i'
$'I
'tl. W, le L s
Dfm. I D W 3e fi i h ' ; T n' r -
t
'g CD 15TRUt~ T j c. ? '.
g;,c,3 rg-c ROUTE 11-
'g
,,, [ Y bR A J irWO'.!n -
t.
/
y
/g, p
/
g CONTItJHFD
^
DUNS # 04 4;I 0690 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CON 51GNEE
- Ogg, LEAVE THIS COPY WITH CONSIGNEE La**M.'!. mo.
E CONSIGNEE INVOICE NUMBER 94 ConSouo#7to y
/RE/CNT&#VS Cf&v
-J COPY
,,,,,,o,s,s sumat R tover. Numeen DAre Oeicim CretvtNUf ADVANCE StVOND D(5TwaiiON CO PJT T fill AT T 'i +.: T.1 '
CON 5GN(l 5mPPtt 5 NUMSE R N, R Rl NO"lNvoiCfNv e
wst e aOwit (CAsezien FsO DATE & NO.. JUNCisONS) e
/
) )e e
f V ee SMiPPt s stLL 10 t
BRA JWOOD
~
- ~
,p.
S>
TfPC5.lHMl DESCRIPTION OF ARTICLES AND MARKS l WEIGHT l RATE l
TOTAL CHARGES l
?
c, T.
c g
m...
. a. v i.
8'
+
e j
f p i '-f c qf q
~
Ng g--
CO CONSIGNE D>NSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS@e IMIR12/5vm Svvutnm advmrvarwo v-
m
~
CONSIGNEE
,CM.
INVOICE NUMBtt consouanTED COPY FRBGHTWRYS CfWY
~-
REFIE TO twtS Munnafe EQUIP NUMMe omit OeQN Ce fiv{Ny[
ACyANC[
$fYONo otshNanON
- 4 9 7 - t o r,-
CONS 4GN({
SMePPtR 5 NUM8f R hl COMMONWEAL 1:- -
..:i" BRAIDWOOD Uu:
*o('***
""'C'"*5"
""C ho"5) s 6EE CON 5IGNE.E 9 R A I D W O Olt. ~t L..
'OI k,
$MIPPER 84LL 10 iJESTINGHOU',E '"' ' '
'\\ C =g N O'.
3' a-s i n, s.
P u BOX 64c09 C AYETTEVII.L F, rE. ",
.o;1 1.g,J m,
m,c.,,,,eN e...,m.s.No M...s l
..., l l
1 1.,CH..
~'
1 6 : w..m e RA!E WOO ].
m.1
.., i l
C R E D I T ,.n c.
i.E
~, ' _. '..i ' r"U.
.. ?
1 TO T..i PPD
'. i s s. p._
.,p;..-
fs Q
p n.~;..
,. w[. U; L db, i
CO:il J : ',
(,
, 4-DPp. : O k:n is s.s C or;' ' ',
i,,,
EM': '
i Q
.Q*' f' R O UT'?.
./,.
p b6Ali auo:'
i s s g/
CONTINUED
/ d-
- I' 4'
DUNS a 04 4110690 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CONSIGNMEE 8 LEAVE THIS COPY WITH CONSIGNEE L. dr ".',*.,, mo.
c
CONSIGNEE INVOICE NUMBER g-
&J COPY consouantro InscN7Wnes c/Wv
,,,,,,o rHis Nu,4 ate h
eoveP. Numste oA,a oeiGiu ce esveNv movaNce sa vo~o ot sumanoN 1
C'ONTIUllATI
'i-CON 5sGNE t SMiPPER S NUMBtR 1
M RR. N O
.N_,
N...
..,,.....,.P.,o.,,,N,._N_,,
CF;
,ar,1 a,
j
.L,.
i BRA JWOOD Tes 1L t
O' i
HM' otscaiPfioN CF ARTICLES AND MARKS l
WElGHT l RAff TOTAL CHARG($
j i
O I
l
\\
,li
_i: '. '
O O
e
[
.[.
7-
{
m..
4314690 o o e on.E.D FREIGHTWAYS CONSIGNEEg A I g
. I THit enov' unv,
CONSOLIDAT em emie m..cr
MRR #
[bb $[
CECO Q.A.
RECEIPT INSPECTION CHECKLIST A.
SHIPPING DAMAGE ACC RFJ N/A 1.
Corrosion /2xposure/ Fire j
(Weathered, Road Salt, Contaminats) j.
2.
Tie-Down Failure / Rough Handling j
(Damaged Containers, Shifted Load)
V 3.
Physical Damage (Broken, Deformed, Cracked Parts) 4.
Inspection Performed Concurrent with Cognizant PCD Engineer or Designee 1
5.
Inspection Performed after Cognizant PCD Engineer or Designee 6.
Inspection Performed Prior to PCD Engineer's or Designee l
Z
~6 sf Inspected By:
1 >t.e
( /
/ Urmm tl Date:
,.,. - r M E, fi@M")
R. A. VIGN000ill l
g.' e6w-
\\l-(0158P)
BG-3 Revision 8 April 4,1984 Page 13 of 26 EXHIBIT C MRR No. /6[6 /
Electrical Physical Characteristics (B)
Page 1 ACC. REJ. N/A 1.
Is the MRR number affixed to each item or each lot?
2.
Are identification markings affixed to the items and legible?
3.
Are the identification markings traceable to the shipping manifest g supplied documentation?
l 4.
Are protective covers or seals in-place and
/
l intact?
5.
Are there any preservative coatings present and, if so, still functional?
6.
Are there desiccants / inert gas purges present, I
and are they functional?
- ir
- k (0019P)
- ~ _.. _.. - - - _ -,.. - - - - - - _., - -
BG-3 Revision 8 April 4,1984 Page 14 of 26 EXHIBIT C Electrical Physical Characteristics Page 2 ACC. REJ. N/A 7.
If the device is fluid filled or has a
/
lubrication reservoir, has the orientation of the device been such as to preclude damage or leakage?
8.
Are lugs and terminal blocks per CECO /S & L Standards?
l 9.
If welding is present, is it consistent with standar:I electrical construction?
10.
Are painting or galvanizing in an acceptable condition for stor::ge? (subjective review) 11.
Are edges free of burrs and smoot,h?
?
i-cd f
BG-3 Revision 8 April 4,1984 Page 15 of 26 EXHIBIT C Electrical Physical Characteristics Page 3 ACC. REJ. N/A 12.
Is fastening hardware tight and consistent
[
with good workmanship practices?
(Note any abnormal conditions, missing bolts, nut, washers, etc.)
13.
If there are any special site requirements for electrical insulation testing, has OAD performed these or been notified?
( g.; y
... e
_.3 (List whom and when notified
.)
Results of test:
14.
Is there rust, oil, scale, or dirt present in amounts that may impair the usefulness of the part?
15.
Are dimensions of rolled or sheared steel stock within the applicable AISC guidelines?
\\
16.
Are dimensions of fabricated enclosures (junction boxes, etc.) as ordered?
l 1
l (0019P)
BG-3 Revision 8 April 4,1984 Page 16 of 26 EXIIIBIT C Electrical Physical Characteristics Page 4 17.
Are all cable ends sealed for outside storage?
18.
Are Cable Reels standing in an upright position at the time of arrival?
19.
Are there are any gouges or any damage to cable jacket?
COMMENTS:
i.
Of3$
rJfd.y E
Calibrated Equipment Used if Applicable
- Record objective evidence for any measurements, dimensional checks, fluid levels, weld aspects, etc. taken during the receipt in-spection.
If calibrated equipment is used for any inspection, re ord I.D.
number and calibration due date.
/ # n j n g 8.;,. y Inspected by: D i Ill Mi' d
Date:
'5 (0019P)
R. A. VIGNOCCHI
.