ML20215L236
| ML20215L236 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 09/10/1986 |
| From: | Clements W NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| To: | Romano F AIR AND WATER POLLUTION PATROL |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20215L180 | List: |
| References | |
| OL, OLA, NUDOCS 8705120145 | |
| Download: ML20215L236 (3) | |
Text
- _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
(.
f rieg%
UNITED STATES Y
['-
' t, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I ll { ff '
f W ASHINGTON. O C. 20555
\\.
/
September 10, 1986
'86 SEP 10 P3 !!
OF FtCE OF THE SECRETARY A
T uff;:'
RECEWED cccc <
n SEP 11 195 Frank R. Romano, Chairman faERVE9 SEP 101986 Air and Water Pollution Patrol
- P+uc 61 Forest Avenue Ambler, PA 19002 Re: PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC CCMPANY (Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2) (Docket Nos, 50-352/353-OL)
Dear Mr Romano:
This office has received your pleading dated September 4,1986 and cap-tioned: "AWPP'S PETITION FOR HEARING AND LEAVE T0 INTERVENE OPPOSING APPL 1-CANT'S APPLICATION FOR AMEN 0 MENT OF FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NPF-39." As !**
am sure you are aware, this filing is premature. When the NRC Staff has reached a decision on PECO's application of August 19, 1986, a notice will be published in the Federal Register infonning interested persons of their hearing rights, and indicating the procedures for filing petitions. The Commission will not act on your request until that time.
The Office of the Secretary will hold your filing until the Staff has issued its Federal Register Notice. At that time we will formally forward the petition to the Cha'irman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel for appro-priate action. However, in the interim, I will send a copy of your filing to the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and to the ASLBP for their informa-
- tion, I trust this is responsive to your request, Sincerely, d
/
/m WiliamL. Clement (
Chief. Docketing and Service Branch cc: ASLBP and NPR w/ attach.
Service List w/o attach, 8705120145 070507 PDR 0
ADOCK 05000352 PDR
F 1
8 b
UNITED STATES o
[
, ~'l NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h
W ASHIN GTON, D.C. 20556 g
A.ca *;
t t.~ -
- g
/
August 28, 1986
' ' ' ~ '
OFFICE OF THE
'86 ALG 28 Pl2:24 l(({lggg SECRETARY 0C6 S.:
.i((
s i:P A Nf" Robert L. Anthony 3ER'/E3 g,g 281986 Box 186 Moylan, PA 19065 Re: PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY (Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2) (Docket Nos. 50-352/353-OL)
Dear Mr. Anthony:
This office has received your pleading dated August 25, 1986 and cap-tioned: " PETITION BY R.L. ANTHONY TO THE SECRETARY FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE AND FOR A HEARING ON PECO'S APPLICATION FOR AN AMEN 0 MENT OF LICENSE NPF-39 DATED 8/19/86." As I am sure you are aware, this filing is premature. When the NRC Staff has reached a decision on the application in question, a notice will be published in the Federal Register informing interested persons of their hearing rights, and indicating the procedures for filing petitions. Until that time, the Comission cannet act on your request.
The Office of the Secretary will hold your filing until the Staff has issued its Federal Register Notice. At that time we will formally forward the petition to the Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (ASLBP) for appropriate action. However, in the interim, I will send a copy of your filing to the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and to the ASLBP for their information.
I trust this is responsive to your request.
Si cerely 2
Mf William L. C ements Chief, Docketing and Service Branch cc: ASLBP and NRR w/ attach.
Service List w/o attach.
vayun
w 4lS.FUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION...
SECRETARY g (bbdbkHILA ELEC.CO.
Ol Limerick Gen,Sta. Units 1 & 2 DOCKET # 50-353,353
$h,%'
}
(..#
August 25,1986 1
P.pTION BY R.L. ANTHONY TO THE SEORETARY FOR LEAVE TO INTER 7ENE AND FOR A HEARING 05 PECO'S APPLICATION FOR AN AMENDMENT OF LICENSE HPF-39 DATED 8/19/86.
We are in receipt of a copy of a letter from E.J.Bradley.PECo,to H.R.Denton of 8/19/86 enclosing an Application for Amendment of Fac.
Op.Lic. NPF-39 of the same date.
The letter states that FEco " requests changes to the Limerick Technical epecificatioti regarding reports of iodine spikes.."
We hereby estar our petition for a hearing and leave to intervene in opposition to the granting of this amendment. We set forth below the bases for our intervention as required by 10 CFR 2 714
- 1. Nature of our right under the Act. We have demonstrated our interest in our individual health and financial situation as a result of the opera-tion of the Limerick suelear plant and the dangers to us and the public in general. We have studied the dangers for more than five years and have served as an intervenor in the licensing process.
We are customers of PEco and live about 25 miles from the plant and have occasion to travel within its EPZ.
- 2. Be_cause of FECo's unreliable operation of the Limerick plant we are in constant danger of an accident at the plant which could release radio-active poisons which could result in our poisoning and possible death,and that of members of our family, business associatas and friends. We are aware of the deadly effects of iodine releases as witnessed by the deaths and illness of Soviet citizens and other Europeans as a result of the accidental releases from the Chernobyl reactor meident in May 198t.
The full effects of this poisoning in Europe and worldwide are not yet known.
j 3.Possible effect of an_ order.
If the KRC were to issue an orter grant-ing this amendment,the dangers already threatening us from routine re-leases and a :idental releases of radioactive materials from Limerick would cabee plus the dSnger of a nuclear emergency with possible meltdown,3the threat be v stly increased.
We would doubtless to our health and lives to a
be forced into a decision to move from the area with the consequent finan-cial loss from selling our property and business and job connections.The social losses of family and friends would also be severe.
$$n b
- Y eYhah (L {k (;, &
a' i
$