ML20215K647
| ML20215K647 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 08/31/1986 |
| From: | Lacey W, Manko R, Zyra T DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NDISSI:2932, NUDOCS 8610280243 | |
| Download: ML20215K647 (98) | |
Text
O DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION - UNIT NO.1 REACTOR CONTAINMENT INTEGRATED LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS REPORT JULY - AUGUST 1986 6
Prepared By: ,
- Of Date: /0 7
! R. J Manko Test Engineer Reviewed By: .
/ Date: / I !86 T. . Zyra Director Testing and Plant Performance Apptsved By: / 464< c. Date:
/#/{ A.
o /
j W. S. Lacey Plant Manager 8610280243 860831 \D PDR ADOCK 05000334 P PDR
TABLE OF CONTENTS O
Ilg.lg. Pace No.
Section I - Containment Integrated Leakage Test A. Introduction 1 B. Summary of Events 2 C. Edited Log of Events 3-6 D. ILRT Results 7-8 E. Type C Penalties 9 ,
F. As Found Containment Condition - Type C Corrections 10 - 11 O G. Error Analysis (I.S.G.) 12 - 13 1
H. Data Analysis . 14 - 16 I. ILRT and Supplemental Test Data
- 1. Table No. 1 - ILRT Reduced Variables 17
- 2. Table No. 2A - ILRT Results (Total Time) 18
- 3. Table No. 2B - ILRT Results (Mass Point) 19 4 Table No. 3 - Supplemental Test Reduced Variables 20
- 5. Table No. 4A - Supplemental Test Results (Total Time) 21
- 6. Table No. 4B - Supplemental Test Results (Mass Point) 22 1 -i-1
, .- _,.-,, _ _ --- -- __.___ _______-_.m.,-___._,_.,m, - . . - - - _. _ _ - _ - _ , . . _ . _ _ _ _ , . _ - , _ , - _ . , .,_,.,_-m,,--_ , , _ , . . . , _ . _ _ , , . . , .
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
(V I1111 Pace No.
J. ILRT and Supplemental Test Figures
- 1. Figure No. 1 - Cnat We Average Temperature vs Time 23 (End of Pressurization / Stabilization)
- 2. Figure No. 2A - Cnmt Leakage Rate and U.C.L. vs Time 24 (Total Time Analysis Method)
- 3. Figure No. 2B - Cnme Leakage Rate and U.C.L. vs Time 25 (Mass Point Analysis Method)
- 4. Figure No. 3 - Cnmt Air Mass vs Time 26 .
. (During ILRT)
- 5. Figure No. 4 - Cnmt We Average Temperature vs Time 27
( (During ILRT) t
- w
- 6. Figure No. 5A - Supplemental Leakage Rate vs Time - 28 ,
, (Total Time Analysis Method)
I
- 7. Figure No. SB - Supplemental Leakage Rate vs Time 29
.t I (Mass Point Analysis Method)
- 8. Figure No. 6 - Cnmt Air Mass vs Time 30 (During Supplemental Test)
- 9. Figure No. 7 - Cnmt We Average Temperature vs Time 31 (During Supplemental Test)
O
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
('~'h
( I1111 Page No.
Section II - Containment Local Leakage Rate Testing A. Introduction 32 B. Type B Local Leakage Rate Test Results
- 1. Type B LLRT Summary 33 - 34
- 2. Third Refueling Test Results 35 - 38
- 3. Fourth Refueling Test Results 39 - 42
- 4. Fifth Refueling Test Results 43 - 46
- 5. Interim Fuel Cycle (s) Results 47 - 49 C. Type C Local Leakage Rate Test Results
- 1. Type C LLRT Summary 50 - 51
- 2. Third Refueling Test Results 52 - 62 i
! 3. Fourth Refueling Test Results 63 - 75 i
- 4. Fifth Refueling Test Results 76 - 88
- 5. Interim Fuel Cycle (s) Results 89 - 90 l
[ D. Type B and C Local Leak Rate Test Results Summary 91 l
l l
O
-lii-l l
i t
i 4
1 l
i i
I SECTION I
- 1
'I
.I i CONTAINMENT INTEGRATED LEAKAGE RATE TEST i
i i
l i
i i
i
._ . . . _ - . - . - . _ . _ - . . . . . . - . . _- . - _ - _ = _ _ . . - _ - - _ _ - . - _ - _ - . . . _
I.A INTRODUCTION i
)
4 The purpose of this report is to present a description of the Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. I containment leakage testing performed I since the last periodic IIRT (May 1982). ,
I
. This report is submitted as ' required by 10 CFR 50 Appendix J, paragraph V.B.
l.
I f
5
.l
~
4 e
I T
4 h
i l
l s
F F
f
I.B
SUMMARY
OF EVENTS f- x
, ( l Upon completion of all ILRT prerequisites and initial conditions, containment pressurization started July 30, 1986 at 0445, and ended July 30, 1986 at 2230. Containment stabilization started July 30, 1986 at 2304, and ended July 31, 1986 at 0304 Although containment stabilization was reached in four hours, the conditions in containment were greatly influenced by the Containment Air Recire (CAR) fans, which had been in operation before pressurization. The CAR fans imposed a temperature ramp which ove rwhelmed the temperature difference which would result from the actual containment leakage. Approximately 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> was expended in attempts to control the fan influences; but finally on August 1, 1986 at 2351 both operating CAR fans were shutdown, and chilled water to their cooling coils isolated. .
The ILRT was restarted on August 2, 1986 at 0235. After 10.717 hours0.0083 days <br />0.199 hours <br />0.00119 weeks <br />2.728185e-4 months <br />
(N of data analysis, leakage rate results were acceptable using both the Total Time and Mass Point analysis methods. The supplemental leak verifica. tion test was initiated August 2, 1986 at 1416; a stabilization period of two hours was allowed after initiating the superimposed leak. The supplemental leak test ended August 3, 1986 at 0036, results were acceptable using both the Total Time and Mass Point analysis methods.
After review of all ILRT test data, preparations for containment depressurization were begun, and containment depressurization started j
August 3, 1986 at 0235. Containment depressurization was completed j August 3, 1986 at 1115.
N
I.C EDITED LOG OF EVENTS m
July 30. 1986 Completed final containment walkdown inspection, no unacceptable conditions found. Made final review of all prerequisites and initial conditions before the start of containment pressurization.
At 0445 containment pressurization started, but temporarily stopped approximately 10 minutes later. A hose coupling on the air charging line developed a leak. Pressurization resumed at 0635, after correcting this problem.
At 2200, the "A" CAR fan tripped on over current. Secured the "A" CAR fan at 2205, and started the "C" CAR fan.
Completed containment pressurization at 2230, with containment pressure -
at 55.506 PSIA. Secured and vented containment pressurization penetration (Pent 91).
Started containment stabilization period at 2304.
July 31. 1986 u
Completed stabilization at 0304. Containment temperature was trending negative and decreasing with time, -0.245 *R/Hr at the end of stabilization.
Started ILRT at 0337 Periodic inspections of the containment pressure boundary were started during pressurization, no detectable signs of leakage were found.
These inspections continued throughout the duration of the ILRT.
- O 3
I.C EDITED LOG OF EVENTS (continued)
O July 31. 1986 (continued)
Initial leakage results were unacceptable. Mass trended negatt've initially, but this trend decreased with time. After approximately six hours, mass had started trending positive. Containment temperature at this time was relatively constant at -2* R/ Day.
Containment temperature continued to trend at -2* R/ Day, and correspondingly mass continued increasing.
Aunust 1. 1986 Attempted to reduce the negative temperature trend by throttling CAR fan cooler flow. AC-150 (common inlet header throttle valve) was throttled approximately 2 turns opened at 1930. The resulting change in temperature was minimal, so AC-150 was again throttled to 1/2 turn opened at 2145.
The second valve adj ustment had a significant effect on containment conditicns. Temperature was now trending positive.
The temperature trend remained positive at 0.220' R/ Day, so AC-150 was throttled open an additional 1/4 turn at 0413.
Restarted ILRT at 0517, tempera *a N trend still positive at 0.01' R/ Day.
Increase demand on the chilled water system during the daylight hours caused an increased positive containment temperature trend. 1.68*
R/ Day. Attempted control of chilled water temperature using the chiller load adjustment. This method was very effective.
a 4
f
I.C EDITED LOG OF EVENTS (continued)
O V Aunust 1. 1986 (continued)
Restarted ILRT at 1617, containment temperature trending at 0.5' R/ Day.
The limit of chiller load adjustment was reached at 2030. Due to the possibility of the chiller tripping, no further adjustments were made.
The positive containment temperature trend began increasing once the chiller limit was reached. The only remaining option was to shutdown the CAR fans, thereby removing their influence on containment.
The B and C CAR fans were shutdown, and chilled water isolated using AC-150 at 2351.
August 2. 1986 Containment temperature stabilized very quickly after the CAR fans were
/~')
C secured. Within two hours temperature had stabilized. At 0235 the ILRT was restarted. Temperature trended very stable throughout the remainder of the ILRT, 0.10' R/ Day.
After several hours of data analysis acceptable leakage results were obtained using both the Total Time and Mass Point analysis methods. At 1318 the ILRT was concluded with a leakage rate at the U.C.L. of 0.01276 PCT / DAY using the Total Time method, and 0.000856 PCT / DAY using the Mass Point method.
The supplemental leak verification test was started at 1416. After initiation of the superimposed leak, two hours were allowed for stabilization. At 0035, the supplemental leak verification test was concluded with both the Total Time and Mass Point analysis methods meeting the acceptance criteria.
O
t I.C EDITED LOG OF EVENTS (continued'r Aunust 2. 1986 (continued)
After reviewing all leakage rate results, and the results from the verification test, preparations for containment depressurization were began. At 0235, containment depressurization started.
August 3. 1986 Completed containment depressurization at 1115.
I 4
i I
i
- , - , , _ _ _ _ . . . . _ . . , _ _ -..---.,....____.--..wg,,- - , . . = --
I.D ILRT RESULTS f)
V Total Tima Analysis A. Leakage Rate Calculated (Lam) -0.009516 PCT / DAY B. 95 % Confidence Level 0.022277 PCT / DAY C. U.C.L., Leakage Rate with 95 %
Confidence Level 0.012761 PCT / DAY D. Type C Penalties 0.001496 PCT / DAY E. Total Integrated Leakage Rate 0.014257 PCT / DAY The ILRT was acceptable in accordance with 10 CFR 50 Appendix J, BN-TOP-1, and BVPS #1 Tech Spec 4.6.1.2.
Sucolemental Test - Total Time Analysis ,
(Lo + Lam - 0.25 La) f Le 6 (Lo + Lam + 0.25 La)
()
where:
Lo -
0.099873 PCT / DAY Lam - -0.009516 PCT / DAY ,
La -
0.1 PCT / DAY Lc -
0.076902 PCT / DAY Lower Limit (0.099873 +(-0.009516) - 0.025) - 0.065357 PCT / DAY Measured Composite Leakage (Lc) - 0.076902 PCT / DAY Uoper Limit (0.099873 +(-0.009516) + 0.025) - 0.115357 PCT / DAY The Supplemental Test was acceptable in accordance with 10 CFR 50 Appendix J, BN-TOP-1, and BVPS #1 Tech Spec 4.6.1.2.
O 7-l
I.D ILRT RESULTS (continued) b'"
Mass Point Analysis A. Leakage Rate Calculated (Lam) -0.003714 PCT / DAY B. 95 % Confidence Level 0.004570 PCT / DAY C. U.C.L., Leakage Rate with 95 %
Confidence Level 0.000856 PCT / DAY D. Type C Penalties 0.001496 PCT / DAY F. Total Integrated Leakage Rate 0.002352 PCT / DAY The ILRT was acceptable in accordance with 10 CFR 50 Appendix J and BVPS #1 Tech Spec 4.6.1.2.
Sunnlemental Test - Mass Point Analysis ,
(Lo + Lam - 0.25 La) $ Lc 5 (Lo + Lam + 0.25 La)
O where:
Lo -
0.099873 PCT / DAY Lam - -0.003714 PCT / DAY La - 0.1 PCT / DAY Lc -
0.081027 PCT / DAY Lower Limit (0.099873 +(-0.003714) - 0.025) - 0.071159 PCT / DAY Measured Composite Leakage (Lc) - 0.081027 PCT / DAY Uoner Limit (0.099873 +(-0.009516) + 0.025) - 0.121159 PCT / DAY The Supplemental Test was acceptable in accordance with 10 CFR 50 Appendix J and BVPS #1 Tech Spec 4.6.1.2.
(s_-
\
I.E TYPE C LEAKAGE PENALTIES O'- Penetrations not vented inside/outside containment as required for the ILRT are accounted for by adding the minimun pathway Type l C
leakage to the final ILRT results. All penetrations listed below were Type C tested during the fifth refueling outage, and prior to ILRT performance.
PENT NO. TYPE C LEAKAGE TYPE C LEAKAGE (SCF/D) (PCT / DAY) 1 0.463 7.134E-06 5.09 7.843E-05 4 0.462 7.ll8E-06 5 2.32 3.575E-05 8 0.563 8.675E-06 9 0.561 8.644E-06 11 0.582 8.967E-06 .
13 0.463 7.134E-06 14 0.463 -7.134E-06 16 67.35 1.038E-03 g-') 17 0.462 7.ll8E-06
(j 18 2.77 4.270E-05 24 0.462 7 ll8E-06 25 10.60 1.634E-04 26 1.63 2.512E-05 27 0.562 8.659E-06 28 0.462 7.118E-06 55-2 0.463 7.134E-06 58 0.463 7.134E-06 97-1 0.462 7.ll8E-06 110-1 0.463 7.134E-06 97.116 1.496E-03 Type C Leakage Penalty added to ILRT results - 0.001496 PCT / DAY a
1 Refer to Section I.F for the definition of minimum penetration a -s pathway leakage rate.
I.F AS FOUND CONTAINMENT CONDITION - TYPE B and C CORRECTIONS
)
In order to account for the effect of local leakage rate test (Type 3 and C) repairs (made prior to the ILRT) on the as found condition of containment, a analysis of LLRT results was performed.
The following definitions are used in the determination of as found and as left minimum pathaway leakage rate:
As Found Penetration Leakage Rate - The leakage rate measured by the initial LLRT prior to any maintenance, repairs, etc.2 on the penetration CIV's 1.
As Left Penetration Leakage Rate - The leakage rate measured by the final LLRT after completion of all maintenance, repairs, etc.2 on the penetration CIV's 1. -
Minimum Penetration Pathway Leakage Rate -
The minimum pathway leakage rate for a particular penetration depends on the CIV 1 configuration for that penetration. For example, a penetration consisting of two series valves, would have a minimum leakage equal to the lowest leakage rate of the two valves.
The as found minimum pathway leakage rate is reviewed against the as left minimum pathway leakage rate for each containment penetration.
A correction is noted if the as found minimum pathway leakage is reduced because of maintenance, repairs, etc.2, i
The minimum pathway leakage rate for the following containment penetrations was reduced as a result of repairs 1 1
- CIV - Containment Isolation Valve i 2 Not limited to repairs from LLRT's, may also include preventive maintenance, design modifications, etc. .
i
I.F AS FOUND CONTAINMENT CONDITION - LLRT CORRECTIONS (continued)
O AS FOUND MINIMUM AS LEFT MINIMUM LEAKAGE CNMT PENT NO. PATHWAY LEAKAGE PATHWAY LEAKAGE DIFFERENCE (SCFD) (SCFD) (SCFD) 56-3 51.07 0.465 50.61 64 1.20 0.462 0.738 89 9.69 7.83 1.86 91 3.47 0.463 3.01 93 13.36 11.04 2.32 7-G 1.45 0.102 1.35 13-F 15.65 1.28 14.37 95.890 21.642 74.258 As found containment correction leakage - 74.258 SCF/D or 0.001144 PCT / DAY Adding this as found containment correction leakage to the measured ILRT results yields the following:
Total Time Analysis Method Total Integrated Leakage Rate -------------------
0.014257 PCT / DAY As Found Cnmt Correction Leakage Rate -----------
0.001144 PCT / DAY Sum ---------------------------------------------
0.015401 PCT / DAY Mass Point Analysis Method i
Total Integrated Leakage Rate -------------------
0.002352 PCT / DAY As Found Cnmt Correction Leakage Rate -----------
0.001144 PCT / DAY Sum ---------------------------------------------
0.003496 PCT / DAY
\
l l
I.G ERROR ANALYSIS - I.S.G.
- 1. Instrument Parameters
- a. Total Absolute Pressure Number of Sensors -------------------------- 1 Sensor Sensitivity Error ------------------- 0.001 Measurement System Error ------------------- O ep - 0.001 PSIA Pressure Contribution ------------------------ 3.560523E-10
- b. Water Vapor Pressure Number of Sensors -------------------------- 5 Sensor Sensitivity Error ------------------- 0.5
~
i Measurement System Error ----------- ------- 0.125 I
i j epy - 0.002381 PSIA -
Water Vapor Contribution ---------------------
2.018428E-09 I
l
- c. Temperature Number of Sensors -------------------------- 16 Sensor Sensitivity Error ------------------- 0.1
. Measurement System Error ------------------- 0.075 eT - 0.031250 *R l Temperature Contribution -------------------- 3.373926E-09 t
i 12-
I.G ERROR ANALYSIS - I.S.G. (continued) a
- 2. Analysis Parameters
- a. Pressure - 53 PSIA
- b. Temperature - 538 *R
- c. Dewpoint - 64
- F
- d. La - 0.1 PCT / DAY 1/2 2 -
-2 -
-2 2400 ep eg eT t- 2 +2 + 2 0.25 La P 'P T t - 10.293 Hours 1/2 2 -
-2 -
-2 2400 ep eg eT 0.25 La $ 2 +2 +2 t P P T
< For t - 10.717 Hours, I.S.G - 0.0240 PCT / DAY ,
a
> N i
4
-- , .-.-,,_--..,,,,~,--..w., e, -._-.-.-y .._,.,..---,.,..y.. ..,cy,-,._,---,-v,*.~._%,..,--m .-,%-,m_._ m_r_.--- , . . --- - - . . . _,.
I.H DATA ANALYSIS O
b Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation supplied the leakage rate analysis computer system. This computer systen performed raw data reduction, and leakage rate analysis (Total Time and Mass Point).
The computer system also provided graphics capabilities, which greatly aided in identifying trends.
Two seperate computer systems were used for data logging, the plant process computer (Westinghouse P-250), and a dedicated portable computer. Both data logging computer systems scanned the same field inputs. Instantaneous data collection occurred at 5 minutes intervals.
Instantaneous data was manually input at 20 minutes intervals for the leakage rate analysis. The P-250 data was used for the ILRT analysis -
due to the higher resolution analog - digital converter; however data from the portable computer data collection system was input for the same time interval, and the results were also acceptable.
The following Tables list the reduced variables and leakage rate calcultaions from the Stone and Webster computer: -
Table No. 1 - Reduced Variables (ILRT)
Table No. 2A - Leakage Rate Results'(ILRT - Total Time)
Table No. 2B - Leakage Rate Results (ILRT - Mass Point)
Table No. 3 - Reduced Variables (Supplemental Test)
Table No. 4A - Leakage Rate Results (ILRT)
Table No. 4B - Leakage Rate Results (Supplemental Test)
The following Figures are graphic presentation of containment air mass, temperature, and calculated leakage rate, using data from Tables No. 1 thru 4 :
Figure No. 1 - Cnmt Wt Ave Temperature (End of Pressurization / Stabilization)
I.H DATA ANALYSIS (continued)
()
'~ / Figure No. 2A - Cnat Leakage Rate and U.C.L. - ILRT (Total Time Analysis)
Figure No. 2B - Cnme Wt Ave Temperature (Mass Point Analysis)
Figure No. 3 - Cnat Air Mass - ILRT Figure No. 4 - Cnat Wt Ave Temperature - ILRT Figure No. 5A - Supplemental Leakage Rate (Total Time Analysis)
Figure No. SB - Supplemental Leakage Test (Mass Point Analysis)
Two Containment Air Recire (CAR) fans had been in operation before the start of pressurization. Each fan cooler unit operated with chilled water throttled to approximately 90 GPM. The initial mass ,
loss was attributed to the disturbance the CAR fan trip had on temperature, pressure, and especially moisture. Once these variables assumed their straight line trend, mass started increasing.
O It appeared that the CAR fans were primarily responsible for the containment trend, and overwhelming the temperature differential that would result from the actual containment leakage. Once the containment temperature rate of change was reduced by securing the CAR fans, air mass and absolute pressure remained relatively constant. The containment temperature trend during the ILRT measurement was approximately -0.065 'R/ Day, most likely accounting for the slight positive air mass trend experienced during the ILRT.
The Supplemental Superimposed Leak Test was performed using a imposed leak of approximately La. A stablization period of two hours was O
N~-
.. . . - . . . .. ._ .- .. _ . _ . = . . . _ - < _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ . -
i
?-
{- I.H DATA ANALYSIS (continued) i i
1 allowed after imposing the leak on containment. After stablization, i '
the Supplemental Test lasted 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> 17 minutes, and was satisfactory using both the Total Time and Mass Point analysis methods.
i i
t i
i t
i i
)
1 i
1 i
i l
l 6
i i
f i
I l
l t
l l
16-l
. - . . . - . - ~ _ . _ - . - _ . - . - . _ _
I.I.1 TABLE NO. 1 - INTEGRATED LEAKAGE RATE TEST REDUCED VARIABLES r
\v\}
TIME ZERO IS 8-2-86 @ 0235
, ABS VAP SET TIME PRESS PRESS TEMP DEWPT AIR MASS (HR) (PSIA) (PSIA) (*R) (*F) (LBM) 1 0.000 55.372 0.3014 537.924 64.613 497393.56 2 0.333 55.372 0.3020 537.924 64.674 497387.57 3 0.667 55.372 0.3025 537.927 64.724 497380.17 4 1.000 55.372 0.3030 537.924 64.771 497378.25 5 1.333 55.372 0.3030 537.921 64.770 497381.28
- 6 1.667 55.372 0.3035 537.927 64.814 497371.50 7 2.000 55.372 0.3037 537.927 64.831 497371.49 8 2.333 55.372 0.3041 537.924 64.872 497368.24 9 2.667 55.372 0.3041 537.924 64.872 497369.17 10 3.000 55.372 0.3042 537.924 64.896 497367.54 11 3.333 55.372 0.3044 537.929 64.901 497360.63 12 3.667 55.372 0.3043 537.932 64.891 497359.01 13 4.000 55.372 0.3045 537.930 64.906 497359.40 ,
3 14 4.333 55.372 0.3047 537.933 64.934 497354.34 15 4.667 55.372 0.3048 537.931 64.941 497355.02 16 5.000 55.373 0.3047 537.925 64.926 497371.70
() 17 18 19 5.333 5.667 6.050 55.373 55.373 55.373 0.3048 0.3047 0.3048 537.921 537.927 537.926 64.936 64.929 64.943 497373.93 497369.01 497369.04 20 6.383 55.373 0.3047 537.927 64.926 497369.28 21 6.717 55.373 0.3047 537.917 64.932 497377.84 22 7.050 55.373 0.3047 537.915 64.933 497.380.26 23 7.383 55.373 0.3052 537.915 64.973 497376.05 24 7.717 55.373 0.3049 537.907 64.951 497386.09 25 8.050 55.373 0.3053 537.910 64.988 497370.01 26 8.383 55.372 0.3052 537.893 64.981 497387.10 27 8.717 55.372 0.3054 537.894 64.996 497384.71 28 9.050 55.372 0.3053 537.896 64.988 497382.75 29 9.383 55.373 0.3057 537.903 65.022 497382.37 30 9.717 55.373 0.3057 537.890 65.047 497394.45 31 10.050 55.373 0.3060 537.901 65.047 497381.54 32 10.383 55.373 0.3059 537.899 65.043 497384.20 33 10.717 55.373 0.3087 537.895 65.304 497371.66 Time of Data Set #01 is 0235 - 8/2/86 Time of Data Set #33 is 1318 - 8/2/86 O
I.I.2 TABLE NO. 2A - INTEGRATED LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS
/T ABSOLUTE TEST METHOD, TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS
^
TIME ZERO IS 8-2-86 @ 0235 SET TIME AIR MASS LEAKAGE CONF LVL UCL (HR) (LBM) (PCT / DAY) (PCT / DAY) (PCT / DAY) 1 0.000 497393.56 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 2 0.333 497387.57 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 3 0.667 497380.17 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 4 1.000 497378.25 0.079440 0.131446 0.210886 5 1.333 497381.28 0.053030 0.073585 0.126615 6 1.667 497371.50 0.053540 0.059028 0.112568 7 2.000 497369.49 0.051247 0.047466 0.098713 8 2.333 497368.24 0.047607 0.039859 0.087466 9 2.667 497369.17 0.042185 0.034326 0.076511 10 3.000 497367.54 0.037992 0.030772 0.068764
! 11 3.333 497360.63 0.037327 0.030274 0.067601 12 3.667 497359.01 0.036331 0.029334 0.065665 13 4.000 497359.40 0.034491 0.027924 0.062415 14 4.333 497354.34 0.033906 0.027477 0.061383 15 4.667 497355.02 0.032581 0.026540 0.059121 (N 16 5.000 497371.70 0.027107 0.025549 0.052656
\,) 17 5.333 497373.93 0.022075 0.024509 0.046584 18 5.667 497369.01 0.018779 0.023460 0.042239 19 6.050 497369.04 0.015459 0.022690 -0.038149 20 6.383 497369.28 0.013035 0.022059 0.035094 21 6.717 497377.84 0.009758 0.021279 - 0.031037 22 7.050 497380.26 0.006682 0.020605 0.027287 1 23 7.383 497376.05 0.004543 0.020311 0.024854 24 7.717 497386.09 0.001661 0.019766 0.021427 25 8.050 497370.01 0.000727 0.020418 0.021145 26 8.383 497387.10 -0.001595 0.020045 0.018450 27 8.717 497384.71 -0.003401 0.019945 0.016544 28 9.050 497382.75 -0.004808 0.020093 0.015285 29 9.383 497382.37 -0.006000 0.020360 0.014360 30 9.717 497394.45 -0.007826 0.020180 0.012354 31 10.050 497381.54 -0.008617 0.02v735 0.012118 I
32 10.383 497384.19 -0.009454 0.021156 0.011702
- 33 10.717 497371.66 -0.009616 0.022277 0.012661 Time of Data Set #01 is 0235 - 8/2/86 Time of Data Set #33 is 1318 - 8/2/86
, rS s-
I.I.3 TABLE NO. 2B - INTEGRATED LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS V ABSOLUTE TEST METHOD, MASS POINT ANALYSIS TIME ZERO IS 8-2-86 @ 0235 SET TIME AIR MASS LEAKAGE CONF LVL UCL (HR) (LBM) (PCT / DAY) (PCT / DAY) (PCT / DAY) 1 0.000 497393.56 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 2 0.333 497387.57 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 3 0.667 497380.17 0.0?5913 0.050500 0.147413 4 1.000 497378.25 0.077224 0.034336 0.111560 5 1.333 .497381.28 0.049063 0.041440 0.090503 6 1.667 497371.50 0.054222 0.025370 0.079592 7 2.000 497369.49 0.053383 0.016984 0.070367 8 2.333 497368.24 0.050087 0.012756 0.062843 9 2.667 497369.17 0.044310 0.011521 0.055831 10 3.000 497367.54 0.040239 0.010024 0.050263 11 3.333 497360.63 0.040735 0.008085 0.048820 12 3.667 497359.01 0.040357 0.006663 0.047020 .
13 4.000 497359.40 0.038614 0.005865 0.044479 14 4.333 497354.34 0.038506 0.004986 0.043492 15 4.667 497355.02 0.037227 0.004485 0.041713 5.000 O
16 17 5.333 497371.70 497373.93 0.030226 0.024195 0.008118 0.009383 0.038345 0.033578 18 5.667 497369.01 0.020788 0.008985 0.029774 19 6.050 497369.04 0.017935 0.008472 0.026407 20 6.383 497369.28 0.015568 0.007939 0.023507 21 6.717 497377.84 0.012013 0.007971 0.019984 22 7.050 497380.26 0.008798 0.007890 0.016688 23 7.383 497376.05 0.006928 0.007416 0.014344 24 7.717 497386.09 0.003975 0.007382 0.011357 25 8.050 497370.01 0.003782 0.006778 0.010560 j 26 8.383 497387.10 0.001497 0.006639 0.008136 27 8.717 497384.71 -0.000054 0.006324 0.006270 28 9.050 497382.75 -0.001086 0.005951 0.004865 29 9.383 497382.37 0.001874 0.005587 0.003713 30 9.717 497394.45 -0.003622 0.005484 0.001862 31 10.050 497381.54 0.003910 0.005132 0.001222 32 10.383 497384.19 -0.004341 0.004825 0.000484 33 10.717 497371.66 -0.003714 0.004570 0.000856 Time of Data Set #01 is 0235 - 8/2/86 Time of Data Set #33 is 1318 - 8/2/86
. O_-
s
-19
_~ - . . _ . , - - - - - . - . . - . , , _ _ _ , _ , . . _ ~ . , . . __r.,..__ . - , , , _ . . _ _ . . _ . . _, _ -
I.I.4 TABLE NO. 3 - SUPPLEMENTAL VERIFICATION TEST REDUCED VARIABLES O TIME ZERO IS 8-2-86 @ 0235 ABS VAP SET TIME PRESS PRESS TEMP DEWPT AIR MASS (HR) (PSIA) (PSIA) (*R) (*F) (LBM) 42 13.717 55.372 0.3071 537.871 65.157 497390.48 43 14.050 55.371 0.3074 537.865 65.179 497384.23 44 14.383 55.370 0.3077 537.872 65.208 497366.25 45 14.717 55.370 0.3072 537.863 65.168 497378.40 46 15.050 55.369 0.3076 537.861 65.205 497367.60 47 15.383 55.368 0.3076 537.857 65.198 497363.16 48 15.717 55.367 0.3079 537.856 65.227 497352.25 49 16.050 55.367 0.3078 537.862 65.215 497347.67 50 16.383 55.366 0.3079 537.853 65.230 497345.71 51 16.717 55.365 0.3081 537.859 65.245 497329.72 52 17.050 55.365 0.3078 537.854 65.223 497335.95 53 17.383 55.363 0.3073 537.856 65.178 497329.72 54 17.717 55.363 0.3073 537.854 65.178 497322.15 '
55 18.050 55.363 0.3072 537.858 65.167 497319.88 56 18.383 55.362 0.3071 537.863 65.159 497306.83 57 18.717 55.362 0.3069 537.866 65.134 497306.11 58 19.050 55.361 0.3066 537.860 65.107 497305.51
(\ 59 19.383 55.361 0.3066 537.879 65.104 497288.70
# 60 19.717 55.360 0.3068 537.872 65.125 497283.75 61 20.050 55.360 0.3064 537.873 65.088 497286.71 62 20.383 55.360 0.3065 537.873 65.095 497285.98 63 20.717 55.359 0.3065 537.879 65.099 497270.43 64 21.000 55.359 0.3064 537.882 65.088 497268.69 65 21.333 55.359 0.3065 537.891 65.099 497259.50 66 21.667 55.359 0.3065 537.896 65.095 497255.09 67 22.000 55.359 0.3067 537.909 65.118 497240.99 i
i Time of Data Set #42 is 1618 - 8/2/86 Time of Data Set #67 is 0035 8/3/86 f
v
I.I.5 TABLE NO. 4A - SUPPLEMENTAL VERIFICATION TEST RESULTS O
ABSOLUTE TEST METHOD, TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS TIME ZERO IS 8-2-86 @ 0235 SET TIME AIR MASS LEAKAGE CONF LVL UCL (HR) (LBM) (PCT / DAY) (PCT / DAY) (PCT / DAY) 42 0.000 497390.48 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 43 0.333 497384.23 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 44 0.666 497366.25 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 45 1.000 497378.40 0.091954 0.799895 0.891849 46 1.333 497367.60 0.080721 0.293502 0.374223 47 1.566 497363.16 0.074155 0.1S5783 0.259938 48 2.000 497352.25 0.078132 0.144051 0.222183 49 2.333 497347.67 0.079044 0.119217 0.198261 50 2.666 497345.71 0.076715 0.101486 0.179201 51 3.000 497329.72 0.081666 0.093071 0.174737 -
52 3.333 497335.94 0.078714 0.083993 0.162707 53 3.666 497329.72 0.077032 0.077004 0.154036 54 4.000 497322.15 0.076603 0.071564 0.148167 55 4.333 497319.88 0.075312 0.066958 0.142270 O- 56 4.666 497306.83 0.076414 0.063572 0.139986 57 5.000 497306.11 0.076102 0.060335 0.136437
- 58 5.333 497305.51 0.074868 0.057426 0.132294 59 5.666 497288.70 0.076027 0.055344 0.131371 60 6.000 497283.75 0.076836 0.053382 0.130218 61 6.333 497286.71 0.076218 0.051362 0.127580 62 6.666 497285.98 0.075093 0.049519 0.124612 63 7.000 497270.43 0.075430 0.048037 0.123467 64 7.283 497268.69 0.075511 0.046543 0.122054 65 7.616 497259.50 0.075830 0.045324 0.121154 4
66 7.950 497255.09 0.075999 0.044166 0.120165 67 8.283 497240.99 0.076902 0.043287 0.120189 Time of Data Set #42 is 1618 - 8/2/86 Time of Data Set #67 is 0038 - 8/3/86 A
U
-l I.I.6 TABLE NO. 4B - SUPPLEMENTAL VERIFICATION TEST RESULTS J
ABSOLUTE TEST METHOD, MASS POINT ANALYSIS TIME ZERO IS 8-2-86 @ 0235 SET TIME AIR MASS LEAKAGE CONF LVL UCL (HR) (LBM) (PCT / DAY) (PCT / DAY) (PCT / DAY) 42 0.000 497390.48 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 43 0.333 497384.23 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 44 0.666 497366.25 0.175488 0.420303 0.595791 45 1.000 497378.40 0.078466 0.176911 0.255377 46 1.333 497367.60 0.074674 0.081893 0.156567 47 1.666 497363.16 0.072116 0.048648 0.120764 1 48 2.000 497352.25 0.080393 0.033906 0.114299 49 2.333 497347.67 0.082658 0.024503 0.107161 50 2.666 497345.71 0.080105 0.018716 0.098821 51 3.000 497329.72 0.087054 0.016443 0.103498 52 3.333 497335.94 0.082794 0.013982 0.096776 53 3.666 497329.72 0.080620 0.011726 0.092346 54 4.000 497322.15 0.080257 0.009826 0.090083
, 55 4.333 497319.88 0.078675 0.008508 0.087183 56 4.666 497306.83 0.050406 0.007533 0.087939 57 5.000 497306.11 0.080017 0.006563 0.086580 58 5.333 497305.51 0.078354 0.006002 0.084355 59 5.666 497288.70 0.080082 0.005589 0.085671 60 6.000 497283.75 0.081183 0.005103 0.086286 61 6.333 497286.71 0.080216 0.004678 0.084894 l 62 6.666 497285.98 0.078594 0.004519 0.083114 i 63 7.000 497270.43 0.079113 0.004129 0.083243 64 7.283 497268.69 0.079051 0.003768 0.082818 65 7.616 497259.50 0.079540 0.003485 0.083025 66 7.950 497255.09 0.079777 0.003211 0.082989 67 8.283 497240.99 0.081027 0.003211 0.084238 Time of Data Set #42 is 1618 - 8/2/86 Time of Data Set #67 is 0038 - 8/3/86 1
- 22-
. , . _ , _ , - _ ,,__-__y_.m. y _ .__
....wv -rww --rwe - m-- - - - - -vw-------v--r- - +r -ew* --------*---------------m----- --r--- - ---w
j O O O l BVPS # 1 -
1986 ILRT I CNMT WT AVE TEMP vs TIME .
! END OF PRESSURIZATION / STABILIZATION i TEMP (DEGREES R)
- 540.0 7 '
i
~
) 539.5 -
539.0 h
\
- \
l 4
5 538.5 7
\N i : \
538.0
's.\
l J :
~
537.5 -
l _
- s
! ~
! 537.0 -
! : a J
i 536. 5
~
1- l-- l- ' ' ' 2 '''--8-' ' ' '
!o l ////////////////////
TIME (HOUR)
! PRESSURIZATION COMPLETED - JULY 30 1986 R 2230 l STABILIZATION STARTED - JULY 30 1986 9 2304 i
STABILIZATION COMPLETED - JULY 31, 1986 9 0304 -
l; 1
O O O BVPS # 1 -
1986 ILRT LEAKAGE RATE and U.C.L. vs ELAPSED TIME TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS METHOD LEAKAGE (PCT / DAY) 0.22 - LEAKAGE RATE 0.21 -
o-0.20 -
0.19 --
3 0.18 -
UPPER CONF LEVEL 0.17 7 -
, 0.16 -
~
! 0.15 -
O.14 _
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
~
! . 0.13 -
}
E' 0.12 -
O.11 1 0.10 -
\g
! 0.09 7 g 0.08 - _ _ _ _ _ _ _o_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ; ____________________________________________________
]
0.07 7 0.06 -
0.05
~
o- L o
0.04 -
o.o o o i ~~
) 0.03 -
o, 0.02 -
o... m i
- ^**
0.01 -
'o...~ "*o...
N
- -0.00 -
-0.01 1 u
-0.02
' 'i"''''''''''''''
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 g ELAPSED TIME (HOURS) l i
! ILRT STARTED - 8/2/86 @ 0235 ILRT ENDED - 8/2/86 @ 1318 i
! O O O BVPS # 1 -
1986 ILRT l LEAKAGE RATE and U.C.L. vs ELAPSED TIME
! MASS POINT ANALYSIS METHOD LEAKAGE (FCT/ DAY)
O.15 -
LEAKAGE RATE l 0.14 - ..
0.13 UPPER CONF LEVEL 0.12 1 ^
0.11 -
l 0.10 -
o ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
]
. 0.09 - _________
! T 0.08 I 3
0.07 -
0.06 -
~
0.05
~
o
~
o O~
0.04 + o- o o. o. o y j
- I 0.03 -
'o.
! O~o
- 0.02 -
.o.
fE 0.01 -
o..,
'o j 0.00 -
o....., , , ,
' 2 - ' - ' ' ' - ' - ' - ' - ' - ' - ' - ' 8
- -0.01 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 !#
0 1 2 ELAPSED TIME (HOURS) l ILRT STARTED - 8/2/86 @ 0235 i ILRT ENDED - 8/2/86 @ 1318
- O O O
i
.I 1
497.400 -
o o o o o, oo oo oo
- M* ~ v ooo "o oo
~
o o I ooo g i 497,350 -
t I H
! L I 497.300 -
1 i m i E i 9 M
' ' ' - ' - ' ' - ' - ' - ' - ' - ' - ' 5 497.250 - - - -
8 9 10 11 w 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
! ELAPSED TIME (HOURS)
ILRT STARTED - 8/2/86 @ 0235 ~
ILRT ENDED - 8/2/86 @ 1318 i
I.J.5 FIGURE NO. 4 O _ W-O S
1.LJ O Z -
H
& O -
m Q f0 '
LLJ Cn fO CD G. & -
g 4E J -
WH
] _.J ~
~ us w
~
0; m m
g>Z "
D D LLJHT o O G TD 0 -
m 5 w
3Q
- 1
& - w 4y a 2 w y C$ O -
iD 5 q kW O a w
E<
W U WC g&W O - n Q
>WZ 0 . d m > (13 0
<& - m E o H o -
cu Z
z _ m )
U 0 0 3 l 0 - -
20 I O to a 1 CD O N ic
^ N CD C C -
o NN CD N (A N t i . i . i g i ,
i cm W
T o o o tn o
o o
tn o
o ag tu CD o C1 CD CD ro O
al O CD m
b m m m m rz in \D in LD LD in Lu 9: rr 2- 1C W JJ H s H
d i O O O BVPS # 1 - 1986 ILRT SUPPLEMENTAL TEST LEAKAGE vs ELAPSED TIME TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS METHOD LEAKAGE (PCT / DAY) j 0.120 -
LEAKAGE RATE i
0 i
j 0.110 -
j LOWER LIMIT
} 0.100 - ---------
i 0.090 - UPPER LIMIT L -
0*000 ~
_p O.070 -
i
! 0.060 -
! L
\ m j 0.050 -
i Es 1 0.040 -
g I m i z
.; 0.030 -' ' - ' '
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 g'
! ELAPSED TIME (HOURS) i SUPPLEMENTAL TEST STARTED - 8/2/86 @ 1618 '
j SUPPLEMENTAL TEST ENDED - 8/3/86 @ 0035
O O O r BVPS # 1 - 1986 ILRT SUPPLEMENTAL TEST LEAKAGE vs ELAPSED TIME MASS POINT ANALYSIS METHOD
)
LEAKAGE (PCT / DAY) 0.180 - LEAKAGE RATE i
0.170 - e i 0.160 -
LOWER LIMIT 0.150 -
0.140 -
1 0.130 - UPPER LIMIT l
- , 0.120 -
- e -
O.110 0.100 1 0 090 -
5__________
l 0.060 -
1 l 0.050 -
- g 0.040 -
g l ' '
' s J '
0.030 '
j 7
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 5
ELAPSED TIME (HOURS)
SUPPLEMENTAL TEST STARTED - 8/2/86 @ 1618 SUPPLEMENTAL TEST ENDED - 8/3/86 @ 0035 i .
]
i O O O
!i BVPS # 1 -
1986 ILRT
! CNMT AIR MASS vs ELAPSED TIME
! MASS DURING SUPPLEMENTAL TEST I
! MASS (LBM) i
! 497.500 -
l
} 497.450 -
4 497.400 -
l f 497.350 -
j 497,300 -
497.250 - [
I m .
I 497.200 -
[-
c i - rn
--- ' " ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ''''' S 4 9 7. 1 5 0 j 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 e I ELAPSED TIME (HOURS) l SUPPLEMENTAL TEST STARTED - 8/2/86 8 1618 -
i SUPPLEMENTAL TEST ENDED - 8/3/86 0 0035 i
_ - - - -- _ ---w _
! CNMT WT AVE TEMPERATURE vs ELAPSED TIME TEMPERATURE DURING SUPPLEMENTAL TEST l
j TEMP (DEGREES R) 537.950 -
I _
O 537.900 -
o i O j O
~
o O O O O O o O O O
- 537.850 -
~
l r
537.800 [
I - ?
! 8 i a
' ' ' ' ' ' - ' ' - i - '
537.750 - -
g.
6 8 9
! 0 1 2 3 4 5 7 i
j ELAPSED TIME (HOURS)
! SUPPLEMENTAL TEST STARTED - 8/2/86 @ 1618 SUPPLEMENTAL TEST ENDED - 8/3/86 @ 0035 '
m ..__w.4. . e_. -
__.2-- _ ,_ama_s,-.L.e % aaa >m-. .- -__ . m..t._- Ji . a_ _ lA.. 4-a_. _.-__m_4------ - a- - _ . -#& __ A w .
l I
l l
l l
I I I
I I
1 4
SECTION II i
4 CONTAINMENT LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TESTING - '
3 l
1 l
1 l
i I
i l
l I
1 l
l 1
.-__- .,__ _ - _ . _.._ __ _ ._, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ , . . - - _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .___.___._ _ . _. _, __ , . , _ ._ . . _ . =__
.~ _ _ . . _ - ._- - . - .
II.A INTRODUCTION
- O Local Leak Rate Testing (Type B and C) of containment penetrations is performed on a periodic basis (normally each refueling, but not exceeding 24 months), in accordance with 10 CFR 50 Appendix J and
, BVPS #1 Technical Specifications. The combined leakage rate of containment penetrations subj ect to LIAT's shall be less than 60 percent La 1, at a minimum test pressure of Pa 2, Additionally LLRT's (total volume Type B) are performed for each containment airlock at 6 month intervals in accordance with 10 CFR 50 Appendix J and BVPS #1 Technical Specifications. BVPS al administrative 1y limits each airlock maximum leakage rate to 5 percent La (10 percent La total for both airlocks), and also administrative 1y limits LIRT total leakage (excludin5 both airlocks) to less than 50 percent La to account for the airlock limits. .
v 1 La - Maximum allowable containment leakage rate at Pa Pa - 53.0 PSIA
II.B TYPE B - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS O 1. Type B LLRT Summary Since the previous ILRT (May 1982), BVPS #1 has performed three refueling outages. Each refueling represents a periodic performance of all containment penetrations subject to Type B LLRT's (airlocks, electrical penetrations, etc.). The period covered by each refueling outage is as follows:
Third Refueling ----------------------
06/10/83 - 09/24/83 Fourth Refueling ----------------------
10/11/84 - 01/04/85 Fifth Refueling ----------------------
05/16/96 - 08/25/86 Also during the interium fuel cycles periodic Type B LLRT's are performed on both containment airlocks;f, Personnel Airlock -
(PH PL-1), and Emergency Airlock [PH PL-2].
The following is a summary of the LLRT results in Sections II.B.2, 3, 4, and 5:
Third Refueline Total Electrical Penetration Leakage --------------
40.20 SCF/D Total Mechanical Penetration Leakage -------------
211.68 SCF/D Total Typo B LLRT Leakage ------------------------
251.88 SCF/D Fourth Refueline Total Electrical Penetration Leakage --------------
35.70 SCF/D Total Mechanical Penetration Leakage ---------------
3.27 SCF/D Total Type B LLRT Leakage -------------------------
38.97 SCF/D Fifth Refueline Total Electrical Penetration Leakage --------------
31.90 SCF/D
~ . - - - . ..
II.B TYPE B - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
O 1. Type B LLRT Summary (continued)
Fifth Refueline (continued)
Total Mechanical Penetration Leakage -------------- 44.80 SCF/D i
Total Type B LLRT Leakage ------------------------- 76.70 SCF/D Third Fuel Cvele Personnel Airlock (11-22-82) -----------------------
10.2 SCF/D Personnel Airlock (05-19-83) -----------------------
96.2 SCF/D Equipment Hatch Airlock (12-10-82) ----------------
0.464 SCF/D Fourth Fuel Cvele Personnel Airlock (03-16-84) -----------------------
16.2 SCF/D Personnel Airlock (09-10-84) ----------------------
192.8 SCF/D Equipment Hatch Airlock (03-13-84) ----------------
282.0 SCF/D Equipment Hatch Airlock (09-11-84) ----------------
148.7 SCF/D Fifth Fuel Cvele Personnel Airlock (05-04-85) ------------------------
3.2 SCF/D Personnel Airlock (11-01-85) ----------------------
196.4 SCF/D Personnel Airlock (04-23-86) ----------------------
103.3 SCF/D Equipment Hatch Airlock (06-14-85) ----------------
0.467 SCF/D Equipment Hatch Airlock (12-11-85) ----------------
0.467 SCF/D l
O
II.B TYPE B - LOCAL LEAXACE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
(j I
- 2. Third Refueling Type B LLRT Leakage Results
- a. Electrical Penetrations PENT LEAXAGE PENT LEAKAGE NO 0-RING SEAL / CANISTER NO 0 RING SEAL / CANISTER (SCCM) (SCCM) 1-B 2.0 / 2.0 7-E 2.0 / 2.0 1-D ?.0 / 2.0 7-F 2.0 / 2.0 1-F 2.0/ 2.0 * / N/A 7-G 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 2-B 2.0 / 2.0 8-A 2.0 / 2.2 2-D 2.0 / 2.0 8-B 2.0 / 2.0 2-F 2.0 / 2.0 8-C 2.0 / 2.0 3-A 2.0 / 2.0 8-0 2.0 / 2.0 3-B 2.0 / 2.9 8-E 2.0 / 2.0 3-C 2.0 / 22.0 8-F 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 3-D 2.0 / 2.0 8-G 2.0 / 2.0 3-E 2.0 / 2.0 9-A 2.0 / 2.0 3-F 2.0 / 2.0 9-B 2.0 / 2.0 3-G 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 9-C 2.0 / 3.6 -
4-A 2.0 / 3.4 9-D 2.0 / 2.0 4-B 2.0 / 2.0 9-E 2.0 / 2.0 4-C 2.0 / 66.0 9-F 2.0 / 2.0 4-D 2.0 / 47.5 9-G 2.0 / 9.2 Os 4-E 2.0 / 2.0 10-A 2.0 / 12.2 4-F 2.0 / 2.4 10-B 2.0 / 32.6 4-G 2.0 / 4.5 10-C 2.0 / 14.5 5-A 2.0 / 5.0 10-D 2.0 / 2.0 5-B 2.0 / 2.0 10-E 2.0 / 2.0 5-C 2.0 / 3.6 10-F 2.0 / 2.0 5-D 2.0 / 2.0 10-G 2.0 / 39.8 5-E 2.0 / 2.0 ll-A 2.0 / 3.8 5-F 2.0 / 2.0 11-B 2.0 / 2.0 5-G 2.0 / 31.9 11-C 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 6-A 2.0 / 3.3 11-D 2.0 / 2.0 6-B 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 11-E 2.0 / 13.6 6-C 2.0 / 2.0 ll-F 2.0 / 2.0 6-D 2.0 / 2.0 ll-G 2.0 / 2.0 6-E 2.0 / 3.0 12-A 2.0 / 2.0 6-F 2.0 / 2.0 12-B 2.0 / 20.1 6-G 2.0 / 2.0 12-C 2.0 / 2.0 7-A 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 12-D 2.0 / 14.3 7-B 2.0 / 2.0 12-E 2.0 / 2.0 7-C 2.0 / 3.4 12-F 2.0 / 2.0 7-D 2.0 / 2.0 12-G 2.0 / 2.0 TOTALS 84.0 240.9 82.0 213.9 j-s SHT 1
- SPARE PENETRATION - INSIDE/0UTSIDE CONTAINMENT
II.B TYPE P - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- a. Electrical Penetrations (continued)
PENT LEAKAGE PENT LEAKAGE NO 0-RING SEAL / CANISTER NO 0-RING SEAL / CANISTER (SCCM) (SCCM) 13-A 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 15-E 2.0 / 2.0 13-B 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 15-F 2.0 / 2.0 13-C 2.0 / 2.0 15-G 2.0 / 2.0 13-D 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 16-A 2.0 / 2.0 13-E 2.0 / 6.0 16-B 2.0 / 2.0 13-F 2.0 / 2.0 16-C 2.0 / 2.0 13-G 2.0 / 2.0 16-D 2.0 / 2.0 14-A 2.0 / 2.0 16-E 2.0 / 2.0 14-8 2.0 / 2.0 16-F 2.0 / 2.0 14-C 2.0 / 2.0 16-G 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 14-D 2.0 / 2.0 17-B 2.0 / 2.0 14-E 2.0 / 2.0 17-D 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 14-F 2.0 / 2.0 17-F 2.5/2.0 * / N/A 14-G 2.0 / 28.5 18-B 2.0 / 2.0 15-A 2.0 / 2.0 18-D 2.0 / 2.0 -
15-B 2.0 / 2.0 18-F 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 15-C 2.0 / 2.0 FB-1 2.0 / 2.0 15-D 2.0 / 2.0 TOTALS 42.0 60.5 42.5 26.0 SHT 2
- SPARE PENETRATION - INSIDE/0UTSIDE CONTAINMENT ~
LEAKAGE TOTALS O-RING SEAL / CANISTER (SCCM)
SHT 1 166.0 / 454.8 SHT 2 84.5 / 86.5 TOTAL LEAKAGE 250.5 / 541.3 (SCCM)
TOTAL LEAKAGE 12.7 / 27.5 (SCF/D)
O
._._ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . ~ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ ,
II.B TYPE B - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued) f~)
v
- a. Electrical Penetrations (continued)
The following electrical penetrations required maintenance due to high leak rates:
PENT NO MUR NO INITIAL LEAKAGE FINAL LEAKAGE (SCCM) (SCCM) 3-C CANISTER 837362 90.0 22.0 7-G 0-RING 837369 167.0 2.0 12-A O-RING 837363 125.0 2.0 17-F 0-RING 837368 >2000.0 2.0 18-F 0-RING 837367 >2000.0 2.0 -
() In the course of repairing these penetrations, 17-F and 18-F were determined to be missing 0-Rings (see LER 83-23 for further information). Penetration 3-C could not be repaired following the normal torquing procedure. After pressurizing the canister with freon, the leak was traced to a wire bundle gasket using a freon leak detector. This wire bundle gasket was sealed with epoxy per Engineering Menorandum 60800. The two remaining penetrations, 7-G and 12-A, were repaired using the normal torquing procedure.
- b. Mechanical Penetrations Personnel Airlock (09-17-83) ---------------
119.8 SCF/D Corrective Actions - Replaced inner and outer door 0-Rings, adjusted both doors, and adjusted locking ring limit for both
( ) doors.
i
- - _ - _ . - - - _ -. . ._ . - . = . _ _ , _ . _ _ . _ . . .
II.B TYPE B - LOCAL LEAKAGE FATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- b. Mechanical Penetrations (continued)
Equipment Hetch Airlock (09-15-83) ----------
89.56 SCF/D Corrective Actions - none Fuel Transfer Tube Blind Flange (09-12-83) --
0.463 SCF/D Corrective Actions - none Equipment Hatch Outer Flange (09-13-83) -----
0.459 SCF/D Corrective Actions - none Equipment Hatch Inner Flange (09-13-83) -----
0.471 SCF/D Corrective Actions - none .
Penetration #111 (07-15-83) -----------------
0.462 SCF/D Corrective Actions - none Penetration #112 (07-15-83) -----------------
0.462 SCF/D Corrective Actions - none
- c. Electrical and Mechanical Penetration Type B Totals Electrical Penetration 0-Ring Leakage ---------
12.7 SCF/D Electrical Penetration Canister Leakage ------- 27.5 SCF/D Mechanical Penetrations Leakage ------------- 211.68 SCF/D Total Type B Leakage ------------------------
251.88 SCF/D O
II.B TYPE B - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 3. Fourth Refueling Type B LLRT Leakage Results
(}
- a. Electrical Penetrations PENT LEAKAGE PENT LEAKAGE NO 0-RING SEAL / CANISTER NO 0-RING SEAL / CANISTER (SCCM) (SCCM) 1-B 2.0 / 2.0 7-E 2.0 / 2.0 1-D 2.0 / 2.0 7-F 2.0 / 2.0 1-F 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 7-G 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 2-B 2.0 / 2.0 8-A 2.0 / 4.2 2-D 2.0 / 2.0 8-B 2.0 / 2.0 2-F 2.0 / 2.0 8-C 2.0 / 2.0 3-A 2.0 / 2.0 8-D 2.0 / 2.0 3-B 2.0 / 2.0 8-E 2.0 / 2.0 3-C 2.0 / 2.0 8-F 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 3-D 2.0 / 2.0 8-G 2.0 / 2.0 3-E 2.0 / 2.0 9-A 2.0 / 2.0 3-F 2.0 / 2.0 9-B 2.0 / 2.0 3-G 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 9-C 2.0 / 5.0 .
4-A 2.0 / 3.0 9-D 2.0 / 2.0 4-B 2.0 / 2.4 9-E 2.0 / 2.0 4-C 2.0 / 33.0 9-F 2.0 / 2.0 gs3 4-D 2.0 / 36.0 9-G 2.0 / 16.0 i 4-E 2.0 2.0 10-A 2.0 s' f 4-F 2.0
/
/ 2.0 10-B 2.0
/
/
12.4 34.0 4-G 2.0 / 10.0 10-C 2.0 / 17.7 5-A 2.0 / 2.6 10-D 2.0 / 2.0 5-B 2.0 / 2.0 10-E 2.0 / 2.0 .
5-C 2.0 / 2.0 10-F 2.0 / 2.0 5-D 2.0 / 2.0 10-G 2.0 / 31.0 5-E 2.0 / 2.0 ll-A 2.0 / 3.8 5-F 2.0 / 2.2 11-B 2.0 / 2.0 5-G 2.0 / 29.0 11-C 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 6-A 2.0 / 2.0 11-D 2.0 / 2.0 6-B 2.0/2.0 * / N/A ll-E 2.0 / 6.8 6-C 2.0 / 2.0 11-F 2.0 / 2.0 6-D 2.0 / 2.0 11-G 2.0 / 2.0 6-E 2.0 / 2.0 12-A 2.0 / 2.0 6-F 2.0 / 2.0 12-B 2.0 / 6.5 6-G 2.0 / 2.0 12-C 2.0 / 2.0 7-A 2.0/3.5 * / N/A 12-D 2.0 / 12.0 7-B 2.0 / 5.0 12-E 2.0 / 2.0 7-C 2.0 / 3.2 12-F 2.0 / 2.0 7-D 2.0 / 2.0 12-G 2.0 / 2.0 TOTALS 85.5 174.4 82.0 197.4 SHT 1
\ms/
- SPARE PENETRATION - INSIDE/0UTSIDE CONTAINMENT
II.B TYPE B - LOCAL LEARAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- a. Electrical Penetrations (continued)
PENT LEAKAGE PENT LEAKAGE NO 0-RING SEAL / CANISTER NO 0-RING. SEAL / CANISTER (SCCM) (SCCM) 13-A 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 15-E 2.0 / 4.5 13-B 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 15-F 2.0 / 2.0 13-C 2.0 / 2.0 15-G 2.0 / 2.0 13-D 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 16-A 2.0 / 2.0 13-E 2.0 / 10.3 16-B 2.0 / 2.0 13-F 2.0 / 5.0 16-C 2.0 / 2.0 13-c 2.0 / 2.0 16-D 2.0 / 2.0 14-A 2.0 / 2.0 16-E 2.0 / 2.0 14-B 2.0 / 2.0 16-F 2.0 / 2.0 14-C 2.0 / 2.0 16-G 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 14-D 2.0 / 2.0 17-B 2.0 / 2.0 14-E 2.0 / 2.0 17-D 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 14-F 2.0 / 2.0 17-F 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 14-c 2.0 / 10.0 18-B 2.0 / 2.0 15-A 2.0 / 2.0 18-D 2.0 / 2.0 2.0 2.0 15-B / 18-F 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 15-C 2.0 / 2.0 FB-1 2.0 / 2.0 15-D 2.0 / 3.8 O TOTALS SHT 2 42.0 51.1 42.0 28.5
- SPARE PENETRATION - INSIDE/0UTSILE CONTAINMENT LEAKAGE TOTALS O-RING SEAL / CANISTER (SCCM)
SHT 1 167.5 / 371.8 l SHT 2 84.0 / 79.6 TOTAL LEAKAGE 251.5 / 451.4 (SCCM)
TOTAL LEAKAGE 12.8 / 22.9 (SCF/D) 1 l
.-. _ _ _ - - _ ~ . _ ,
II.B TYPE B - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
O a. Electrical Pentrations (continued)
The following electrical penetrations required maintenance due to high leak rates:
PENT NO MWR NO INITIAL LEAKAGE FINAL LEAKAGE (SCCM) (SCCM) 6-G CANISTER 848317 160.0 2.0 The high leak rate on the 6-G canister was due to a leaking section of tubing used to pressure test the canister. The tubing was repaired with a High Shear strength ashesive and the canister- ,
was then satisfactorily leak tested.
- b. Mechanical Penetrations Personnel Airlock (12-14-84) ----------------
0.461 SCF/D Equipment Hatch Airlock (12-18-84) ---------- 0.479 SCF/D Fuel Transfer Tube Blind Flange (12-07-84) -- 0.471 SCF/D Equipment Hatch Outer Flange (12-16-34) -----
0.459 SCF/D Equipment Hatch Inner Flange (12-16-84) ----- 0.468 SCF/D Penetration alli (11-26-84) ------ ---------
0.465 SCF/D i
Penetration #112 (11-27-84) ----------------- 0.465 SCF/D O
i k
II.B TYPE B - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- c. Electrical and Mechanical Penetration Type B Totals Electrical Penetration 0-Ring Leakage -------
12.8 SCF/D Electrical Penetration Canister Leakage -----
22.9 SCF/D Mechanical Penetrations Leakage -------------
3.27 SCF/D Total Type B Leakage -----------------------
38.97 SCF/D j -
l
)
- 1
]
I l
II.B TYPE B - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
/ 'h 4 Fifth Refueling Type B LLRT Leakage Results V
- a. Electrical Penetrations PENT LEAKAGE PENT LEAKAGE NO O-RING SEAL / CANISTER NO 0-RING SEAL / CANISTER (SCCM) (SCCM) 1-B 2.0 / 2.0 7-E 2.0 / 2.0 1-D 2.0 / 2.0 7-F 2.0 / 2.0 1-F 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 7-G 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 2-B 2.0 / 2.0 8-A 2.0 / 3.7 2-D 2.0 / 2.0 8-B 2.0 / 2.0 2-F 2.0 / 2.0 8-C 2.0 / 2.0 3-A 2.0 / 2.0 8-D 2.0 / 2.0 3-B 2.0 / 2.0 8-E 2.0 / 2.0 3-C 2.0 / 2.0 8-F 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 3-D 2.0 / 2.0 8-G 2.0 / 2.0 3-E 2.0 / 2.0 9-A 2.0 / 2.0 3-F 2.0 / 2.0 9-B 2.0 / 2.0 3-G 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 9-C 2.0 / 10.0
- 4-A 2.0 / 2.0 9-D 2.0 / 2.0 4-B 2.0 / 2.0 9-E 2.0 / 2.0 4-C 2.0 / 2.0 9-F 2.0 / 2.0
,- 4-D 2.0 / 16.9 9-G 2.0 / 13.0
/ 4-E 2.0 / 2.0 10-A 2.0 / 8.2 4-F 2.0 / 2.0 10-B 2.0 / 20.0 4-G 2.0 / 4.1 10-C 2.0 / 10.9 5-A 2.0 / 2.0 10-D 2.0 / 2.0 5-B 2.0 / 2.0 10-E 2.0 / 2.0 5-C 2.0 / 5.8 10-F 2.0 / 2.0 5-D 2.0 / 2.0 10-G 2.0 / 29.0 5-E 2.0 / 2.0 11-A 2.0 / 4.7 5-F 2.0 / 2.0 11-B 10.5 / 2.0 5-0 2.0 / 2.0 11-C 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 6-A 2.0 / 2.0 11-D 2.0 / 2.0 6-B 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 11-E 2.0 / 7.5 6-C 2.0 / 2.0 11-F 2.0 / 2.0 6-D 2.0 / 2.0 11-G 2.0 / 2.0 6-E 2.0 / 2.0 12 A 2.0 / 2.0 ,
6-F 2.0 / 2.0 12-B 2.0 / 6.3 6-G 2.0 / 2.0 12-C 2.0 / 2.0 7-A 2.0/3.3 * / N/A 12-D 2.0 / 11.7 7-B 2.0 / 2.5 12-E 2.0 / 2.0
- 7-C 2.0 / 9.5 12-F 2.0 / 2.0 7-D 2.0 / 2.0 12-G 2.0 / 2.0 TOTALS 85.3 96.8 90.5 173.0 SHT 1
)
- SPARE PENETRATION INSIDE/0UTSIDE CONTAINMENT 43-
II.B TYPE B - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
N a. Electrical Penetrations (continued)
PENT LEAKAGE PENT LEAKAGE NO 0-RING SEAL / CANISTEP. NO 0-RING SEAL / CANISTER (SccM) (SccM) 13-A 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 15-E 2.0 / 12.8 13-B 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 15-F 2.0 / 2.0 13-c 2.0 / 2.0 15-G 2.0 / 2.0 13-D 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 16-A 2.0 / 2.0 13-3 2.0 / 6.8 16-B 2.0 / 2.0 13-F 2.0 / 25.2 16-c 2.0 / 2.0 13-G 2.0 / 2.0 16-D 2.0 / 2.0 14-A 2.0 / 2.0 16-E 2.0 / 2.0 14-8 2.0 / 2.0 16-F 2.0 / 2.0 14-C 2.0 / 2.0 16-G 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 14-D 2.0 / 2.0 17-B 2.0 / 2.0 14-E 2.0 / 2.0 17-D 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 14-F 2.0 / 2.0 17-F 2.0/2.0 * / N/A 14-G 2.0 / 2.0 18-B 2.0 / 2.0 15-A 2.0 / 2.0 18-D 2.0 / 2.0 15-B 2.0 / 2.0 18-F 2.0/2.0 * / N/A -
15-c 2.0 / 2.0 FB-1 5.5 / 2.0 15-D 2.0 / 2.0 TOTALS O
SHT 2 42.0 58.0 45.5 36.8
- SPARE PENETRATION INSIDE/0UTSIDE c0NTAINMENT- .
LEAKAGE TOTALS 0-RING SEAL / CANISTER (SccM, SHT 1 175.8 / 269.8
, SHT 2 87.5 / 94.8 TOTAL LEAKAGE 263.3 / 364.6 (SccM)
TOTAL LEAKAGE 13.4 / 18.5 (SCF/D)
O _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -- __ .__ ___ _- _ .- . _ ,. ___, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ __ _
II.B TYPE B - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- a. Electrical Penetrations (continued)
The following electrical penetrations required maintenance due to high leak rates:
PENT NO MUR NO INITIAL LEAKAGE FINAL LEAKAGE (SCCM) (SCCM) 7-G O-RING 866282 28.5 2.0 13-F CANISTER 866281 308.0 25.2 The high leak rate on the 7-G penetration was due a leaking 0-Ring. The 0-Rings were replaced, and the blind flange retorquad. The high' leak rate on the 13-F penetration was due to a leaking section of tubing used to pressure test the canister.
-g The tubing was repaired with High Shear strength adhesive, and N_s) the canister was satisfactorily leak tested,
- b. Mechanical Penetrations Personnel Airlock (07-30-86) ----------------
40.81 SCF/D Corrective Actions - Adjusted outer door locking ring limit.
Equipment Hatch Alclock (07-28-86) ----------
0.457 SCF/D Corrective Actions - Replaced outer door 0-Rings.
Fuel Transfer Tube Blind Flange (07-19-86) --
0.463 SCF/D .
Corrective Actions - none O _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . - _ _ . . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _
_ _. ~
II.B TYPE B - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
(
- b. Mechanical Penetrations (continued)
Equipment Hatch Outer Flange (07-27-86) -----
0.470 SCF/D Corrective Actions - none Equipment Hatch Inner Flange (07-27-86) -----
0.462 SCF/D Corrective Actions - none Penetration #111 (06-07-86) -----------------
1.67 SCF/D Corrective Actions - none Penetration #112 (06-07-86) -----------------
0.465 SCF/D Corrective Actions - none
- c. Electrical and Mechanical Penetration Type B Totals O
V Electrical Penetration 0-Ring Leakage --------
13.4 SCF/D Electrical Penetration Canister Leakage ------
18.5 SCF/D Mechanical Penetrations Leakage -------------
44.80 SCF/D 1
Total Type B Leakage ------------------------
76.70 SCF/D l
)
1 0 - . - . - - -
II.B - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued) f%
i )
\' / 5. Interim Fuel Cycle Type B LLRT Results Acceptance Criteria for each airlock is 0.05 La - 324.49 SCF/D
- a. Third Fuel Cycle Type B Results Personnel Airlock (11-22-82) ------------------
10.2 SCF/D Corrective Actions - none Equipment Hatch Airlock (12-10-82) -----------
0.464 CCF/D Corrective Actions - none Personnel Airlock (05-19-83) ------------------
92.6 SCF/D Corrective Actions - none
- b. Fourth Fuel Cycle Type B LLRT Results Equipment Hatch Airlock (03-13-84) ------------
282.0 SCF/D Corrective Actions - none Personnel Airlock (03-16-84) ------------------
16.2 SCF/D Corrective Actions - Replaced outer door 0-Rings.
Personnel Airlock (09-10-84) ------------------
192.8 SCF/D Corrective Actions - none Equipment Hatch Airlock (09-11-84) ------------
148.7 SCF/D Corrective Actions - none O
II.C TYPE B - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continuad)
\ c. Fifth Fuel Cycle Type B LLRT Results Personnel Airlock (05-04-85) ---------- - - ------
3.2 SCF/D Corrective Actions - Adjusted outer door locking ring limit.
'quipment Hatch Airlock (06-14-85)
-- 0.467 SCF/D Corrective Actions - none Personnel Airlock (11-01-85) ---- -- --- -------
196.4 SCF/D l
Corrective Actions - Replaced 0-Rings on both doors, adjusted both doors, and adjusted outer door locking ring limit.
Equipment Hatch Airlock (12-11-85) ------ ---- 0.467 SCF/D Corrective Actions - none Personnel Airlock (04-23-86) --- ----------- - -
103.3 SCF/D Corrective Actions - none 9
i l0 l i
,,y ------ -,---,__-m. - - - , ._ ,,,..y--~r , , m_7-.,.n,,, - - - -_ ,mm-.%..,m. e,-,._---. . .-w.~-__.-.-_.w.
l
)
i II.C TYPE B LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued) l l
This page left intentionally blank. i 1
1 I
l l
l
)
II.C TYPE C LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS
- 1. Type C LIRT Summary Since the previous IIRT (May 1982), BVPS #1 has performed three _
refueling outages. Each refueling represents a periodic performance of all containment penetrations subject to Type C LLRT's (containment isolation valves). The period covered by each refueling outage is as follows:
Third Refueling ----------------------
06/10/83 - 09/24/83 Fourth Refueling ----------------------
10/11/84 - 01/04/85 Fifth Refueling ----------------------
05/16/86 - 08/25/86 The following is a summary of the LLRT results in Sections II.C.2, 3, 4, and 5: ,
Third Refueline Total Assigned As Left Penetration Leakage --- 2208.560 SCF/D Total Minimum Pathway1 Leakage Rate -----------
488.713 SCF/D Fourth Refueling Total Assigned As Left Penetration Leakage ---
1969.157 SCF/D 1
Total Minimum Pathway Leakage Rate -----------
465.691 SCF/D Fifth Refueline Total Assigned As Left Penetration Leakage ---
1470.408 SCF/D 1
Total Minimum Pathway Leakage Rate -----------
191.947 SCF/D 1 Refer to Section I.F for the definition of minimum pathway leakage.
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS
/".
- 1. Type C LutT Summary (continued)
Third Fuel Cvele No Type C LLRT's Performed Fourth Fuel Cvele No Type C LutT's Performed Fifth Fuel Cycle Penetration No. 45 - [TV-RC-519] required maintenance for body to bonnet leak Valve As Left Leakage ----------------------------
0.507 SCF/D Penetration No. 90 - [VS-D-5-3A] required closed limit adjustment.
Penetration As Left Leakage Rate l -----------------
1.38 SCF/D Penetration No. 91 - [VS-D-5-5A] required closed limit adjustment.
Penetration As Left Leakage Rate l ---------------- 0.461 SCF/D I
1 Penetration 90 and 91 are pressurized between enmt isolation O valves.
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS / continued)
- 2. Third Refualing Typs C LIJtT Rasults CONTAINMENT AS FOUND AS LEFT ASSICNED PENT VALVE DATE VALVE VALVE PENETRATION C'j'} No. MARX NO. TESTED LEAKAGE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D)
MOV-CC-112A2 X 0.464 0.464 1 08-01-83 95.77 CCR-247 X 95.77 95.77 MOV-CC-ll253 X (NOTE 1) 14.84 2 07-19-83 78.07 CCR-252 X 78.07 78.07 MOV-CC-112A3 X 2.83 2.83 4 08-11-83 169.01 CCR-251 X 169.01 169.01 MOV-CC-112B2 X 0.458 0.458 5 07-08-83 15.57 CCR-248 X 15.57 15.57 TV-CC-107D1 X 1.74 1.74 8 06-23-83 1.78 TV-CC-107D2 X 1.78 1.78 TV-CC-111D1 X 0.457 0.457 9 06-23-83 3.61 3.61
(} TV-CC-111D2 X 3.61 TV-CC-110D X 0.460 0.460 11 TV-CC-110F1 X 06-21-83 0.520 1671.23 0.520 TV-CC-110F2 X FP-827 X 3.66 3.66 13 06-24-83 3.66 TV-FP-107 X 0.457 0.457 l l
TV CC-110E3 X (NOTE 1) 0.965 14 06-28-83 4.60 j TV-CC-11022 X 4.60 4.60 TV-CC-111A2 X 2.85 2.85 i 16 07-05-83 6.75 i TV-CC-lllAl X 6.75 6.75 TV-CC-103B1 X 0.460 0.460 17 07-06-83 15.63 TV CC-103B X 15.63 15.63 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 1 of 7 (SCF/D) 394.970 NOTE 1 - COULD NOT PRESSURIZE INITIALLY i l 1
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 2. Third Refusling Typo C LLRT Results (continusd)
I CONTAINMENT AS FOUND AS LEFT ASSIGNED I
( PENT NO.
VALVE MARK NO.
DATE TESTED VALVE LEAXAGE VALVE LEAKAGE PENETRATION LEAKAGE l
4 IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D)
TV-CC-103C1 X 32.22 32.22 18 07-23-83 198.31 TV-CC-103C X 198.31 198.31 MOV-CH-378 X 835.62 78.26 19 CH-369 X 09-10-83 78.26 MOV-CH-381 X 0.464 0.464 SI-42 X 0.459 0.459 20 06-23-83 0.463 SI-41 X 0.463 0.463 RH-14 X
. 5.51 5.51 24 RH-16 X 07-13-83 5.51 RH-15 X 0.557 0.557 TV-CC-105D1 X 87.14 87.14 06-22-83 87.14 O 25 TV-CC-105D2 X 41.19 41.19 TV-CC-107El X 0.457 0.457 26 06-23-83 0.555 TV-CC-107E2 X 0.555 0.555 TV-CC-105El X 27.06 27.06 27 06-22-83 27.06 TV-CC-105E2 X 0.557 0.557 TV-CH-200A X TV-CH-200B X 16.08 16.08 l TV-CH-200C X 28 07-16-83 68.99 MOV-CH-142 X RV-CH-204 X (NOTE 1) 8.03 TV-CH-204 X 68.99 66.99 I
TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 2 of 7 (SCF/D) 466.288 NOTE 1 - COULD NOT PRESSURIZE INITIALLY.
- . - - - - - - , - ~ - - - , , - . . _ . - . - , .
---r-, - , . - - - - - . - - - - . - - - - - - - --
r, , , , , , , - - , . , - _- ,-,---,,-,,--,-----,---n-. ,,_
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 2. Third Refueling Typs C LLRT Results (continusd)
\ CONTAINMENT AS FOUND AS LEFT ASSIGNED PENT VALVE DATE VALVE VALVE PENETRATION NO. MARK NO. TESTED LEAKAGE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D)
TV-DG-108A X 0.462 0.462 29 07-09-83 1.39 TV-DG-108B X 1.39 1.39 FP-804 X 0.458 0.458 31 06-24-83 0.687 TV-FP-105 X 0.687 0.687 FP-800 X 0.823 0.823 32 06-24-83 1.74 TV-FP-106 X 1,74 1.74 TV-DA-100A X 74.42 74.49 38 08-04-83 74.49 TV-DA-100B X 0.558 0.558 S -15 X 389.95 134.30 42 08-24-83 134.30 -
SA-14 X 4.63 4.63 TV-CV-102-1 X 161.12 161.87 4
(
i 43 TV-CV-102 X 09-09-83 920.68 0.462 161.87 TV-CV-101A X 92.50 92.50 44 06-15-83 92.50 TV-CV-101B X 76.31 76.31 RC-72 X 54.84 54.84 45 06-28-83 54.84 TV-RC-519 X 27.85 1.11 IA-91 X 22.26 2.26
, 47 07-11 83 22.26 IA-90 X 8.81 8.81 TV-DG-109A2 X 0.461 0.461 48 07-06-83 2.81 TV-DG-109Al X 2.81 2.81 RC-68 X 29.03 29.03 49 07-05-83 29.03 TV-RC-101 X 0.461 0.461 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 3 of 7 (SCF/D) 575.917 O
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 2. Third Refusling Typa C LLRT Rasults (continusd)
CONTAINMENT AS FOUND AS LEFT ASSIGNED O PENT VALVE DATE VALVE VALVE PENETRATION NO. MARX NO. TESTED LEAKAGE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D)
TV-SI-101-2 X 16.37 16.37 53 07-06-83 16.37 TV-SI-101-1 X 16.37 16.37 TV-SS-109Al X 0.462 0.462 55-1 06-18-83 0.462 TV-SS-109A2 X 0.462 0.462 TV-LM-100A'1 X 0.461 0.461 55-2 06-15-83 0.461 NOTE 1 TV-LM-100A2 X 0.461 0.461 TV-SS-111A1 X 3.16 0.464 55-4 08-02-83 0.464 TV-SS-111A2 X 0.462 0.462 TV-SS-100A1 X 0.462 0.462 56-1 06-18-83 1.57
- TV-SS-100A2 X 1.57 1.57 TV-SS-102A1 X 0.462 0.462 56-2 06-20-83 0.462 O TV-SS-102A2 X 0.462 0.462 TV-SS-105A1 X 2.48 2.48 56-3 06-22-83 . 24.81 TV-SS-105A2 X 24.81 24.81 TV-LM-101A X 3.22 3.22 57-3 06-15-83 3.22 CV-35 X 0.459 0.459 TV-LM-101B X 2.76 2.76 I 57-4 09-04-83 2.76 CV-36 X 0.459 0.459 t
TV-CC-103Al X 6.15 6.15 58 09-04-83 7.37 i TV-CC-103A2 X 7.37 7.37 l
QS-4 X 382.08 382.08 63 06-28-83 382.08 MOV-QS-101B X 139.27 184.14 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 4 of 7 (SCF/D) 440.029 l
' NOTE 1 - INCLUDES PENETRATIONS 57-1,57-2, AND 97-3 WHICH ALSO SHARE THESE CNMT i iso 1ATION VALVES THROUGH A COMMON 4-WAY VALVE.
i l l
l
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAXAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 2. Third Refusling Typo C LLRT Results (centinusd)
CONTAINMENT AS FOUND AS LEFT ASSIGNED l PENT VALVE DATE VALVE VALVE PENETRATION O- NO. MARK NO. TESTED LEAKAGE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D)
QS-3 X 138.10 138.10 64 06-28-83 138.10 MOV-QS-101A X 278.54 2.34 70 RS-101 X 06-27-83 1.87 1.87 1.87 71 RS-100 X 06-27-83 0.457 0.457 0.457 HY-120 X 2.39 2.39 87 06-16-83 13.34 HY-111 X 13.34 13.34 HY-119 X 4.04 . 4.04 88 06-16-83 4.04 NY-110 X 0.459 0.459 AS-278 X 27.60 27.60 89 06-18-83 27.60 ,
TV-SV-100A X 0.460 0.460 VS-D-5-35 X 90 07-10-83 24.83 24.88 24.88 O VS-D-5-3A X VS-D-5-5B X 91 VS-D-5-5A X 06-25-83 (NOTE 1) 0.462- 0.462 VS-D-5-6 X TV-CV-150C
& X 0.462 0.462 HY-102 92 .06-15-83 9.25 TV-VC-150D
& X 9.25 9.25 NY-104 TV-CV-150B
& X 0.462 0.462 HY-101 93 06-15-83 0.832 TV-CV-150A
& X 0.832 0.832 HY-103 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 5 of 7 (SCF/D) 220.831 NOTE 1 - COULD NOT PRESSURIZE INITIALLY.
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 2. Third Rofu211ng Typo C LLRT Rosults (continusd)
CONTAINMENT AS FOUND AS LEFT ASSIGNED 7-PENT VALVE DATE VALVE VALVE PENETRATION
( TESTED NO. MARX NO. LEAKAGE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D)
HCV-CV-151 X 15.64 15.64 94 06-21-83 34.49 HCV-VC-151 1 X 34.49 34.49 SOV-HY-102B1 X 0.456 0.4,56, 95-64 06-14-83 0.456 SOV-HY-102B2 X 0.456 0.456 SOV-NY-10351 X 0.456 3.456 95-69 06-14-83 0.456 SOV-HY-10352 X 0.456 0.456 SOV-NY-10451 X 0.456 0.456 95-72 06-14-83 0.456 SOV-NY-104B2 X 0.456 0.456 TV-SS-104A1 X 0.459 0.459 97-1 06-22-83 0.459 .
TV-SS-104A2 X 0.459 0.459 TV-SS-103Al X 0.459 0.459 97-2 05-30-83 0.459 O TV-SS-103A2 X 0.459 0.459 PC-38 X 51.06 51.06 103 07-12-83 51.06 PC-37 X 1,44 1.44 PC-9 X 0.464 0.464 104 07-13-83 12.53 PC-10 X 12.53 12.53 TV-SS-112A1 X 0.462 0.462 105-2 06-18-83 0.462 TV-SS-ll2A2 X 0.462 0.462 MOV-SI-842 X 0.458 0.458 106 06-25-83 0.458 TV-SI-889 X 0.458 0.458 SOV-HY-102A1 X 0.456 0.456 109-44 06-14-83 0.456 SOV-HY-102A2 X 0.456 0.456 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 6 of 7 (SCF/D) 101.742 O
- - - - - - , - - - - - , - _ . . , , , _ , . - . , - - . , . - - - - - - - - , . _ , , ~ , , . , ,,---p.
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 2. Third Refueling Typo C LLRT Rasults (continusd)
CONTAINMENT AS FOUND AS LEFT ASSIGNED O. PENT NO.
VALVE MARK NO.
DATE TESTED VALVE LEAKAGE VALVE LEAKAGE PENETRATION LEAKAGE IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D)
SOV-NY-103Al X 0.456 0.456 109-49 06-14 83 0.456 SOV-NY-103A2 X 0.456 0.456 SOV-NY-104A1 X 0.456 0.456 109-52 06-14-83 0.456 SOV-NY-104A2 X 0.456 0.456 RC-277 X 0.461 0.461 110-1 06-15-83 0.461 RC-278 X 0.461 0.461 P.A.L. VS-153 X (NOTE) 7.41 7.41 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 7 0F 7 (SCF/D) 8.783 NOTE 1 - COULD NOT PRESSURIZE INITIALLY.
P.A.L. - PERSONNEL AIRLOCK .
1 O
TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 1 (SCF/D) 394.970 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 2 (SCF/D) 466.288 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 3 (SCF/D) 575.917 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 4 (SCF/D) 440.029 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 5 (SCF/D) 220.831 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 6 (SCF/D) 101.742 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 7 (SCF/D) 8.783 i
TOTAL CONTAINMENT TYPE C LEAKAGE - SUM OF SHEETS 1 THRU 7 (SCF/D) 2208.560 l
() ~
_ ..,_-.-. r_ . - . , . . , - . . - , . _ , - , _ , - , , , , , - . - _ . . . -
.- ,, . _ . . .- _ _ _ - _,,-.-..r...,%. -. _--,. , - , . -
l II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued) i
- 2. Third Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
{Ow} ,
l Penetration #2 The initial leak test was performed July 8, 1983. Valve
[MOV-CC-112B3] would not hold the applied pressure. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 836348; the motor operator limit switch setpoint was adj usted. The Type C retest was performed July 19, 1983 with a leakage of 14.84 SCF/D.
Penetration #11 The initial leak test was performed June 20, 1983. Valve (TV-CC-110Fl] and (TV-CC-110F2] leaked at a combined rate of 1671.23 SCF/D. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 837010, and the valve repositioner for (TV-CC-110Fl] was reset. The Type C retest was performed June 21, 1983 with a combined leakage of 0.520 SCF/D.
Penetration #14 The initial leak test was performed June 20, 1983. Valve
[TV-CC-110E3] would not hold the applied pressure. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 837011, and the seat and plug were replaced. The Type C retest was performed June 20, 1983 with a leakage of 0.965 SCF/D.
Penetration #19 The initial leak test was performed August 18, 1983. Valve
[MOV-CH-378] and (CH-369] leaked at a combined rate of 835.62 SCF/D. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 837543; replace the bonnet, bonnet gasket, packing, and wedges for [MOV-CH-378). The Type C retest was performed September 10, 1983 with a combined leakage of 78.26 SCF/D.
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 2. Third Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
Penetration #28 The initial leak test was performed July 7, 1983. Valve
[MOV-CH-142] would not hold the applied pressure. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 837508; replaced torque switch and adjusted the Limitorque Modutronic actuator. The Type C retest was performed July 16, 1983 with a leakage of 8.03 SCF/D.
Penetration #38 The initial leak test was performed August 3, 1983. Valve (TV-DA-100A] leaked at 74.42 SCF/D. Maintenance Work Request .
830493 performed repairs to the valve limit switch, which required removal of the operator. A Type C retest after the repairs were f-~s completed was performed August 4, 1983 with a leakage of 74.49 SCF/D.
Penetration #42 .
l The initial leak test was performed July 14, 1983. Valve (SA-14]
leaked at 389.95 SCF/D. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 837512, and the plug was cleaned. The Type C retest was performed August 24, 1983 with a leakage of 134.30 SCF/D.
Penetration #43 The initial leak test was performed June 15, 1983. Valve (TV-CV-102] leaked at 920.68 SCF/D. This valve was removed and reinstalled in the opposite direction under Design Change Package 320. The Type C retest was performed September 9, 1983 with a leakage of 0.462 SCF/D.
1
\J
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
'"} 2. Third Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
V Penetration #45 The initial leak test was performed June 24, 1983. Valve
[TV-RC-519] leaked at 27.85 SCF/D. Maintenance Work Request 831185 performed repairs to the valve air regulator. The Type C retest was performed June 28, 1983 with a leakage of 1.11 SCF/D.
Penetration #55-4 The initial leak rate was performed June 18, 1983. Valve
[TV-SS-lllA1) leaked at 3.16 SCF/D. Maintenance Work Request 830495 performed repairs to the valve limit switch. The Type C retest was performed August 2, 1983 with a leakage of 0.464 SCF/D.
\%- Penetration #63 The initial leak rate was performed June 17, 1983. Valve
[MOV-QS-101B] leaked at 139.27 SCF/D. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 830643; replaced the bonnet gasket and repacked the valve. The Type C retest was performed June 28, 1983 with a leakage of 184.14 SCF/D.
Penetration #64 The initial leak test was performed June 18, 1983. Valve
[MOV-QS-101A] leaked at 278.54 SCF/D. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 836586; changed the bonnet gasket, repacked valve, and adjusted limits. The Type C retest was performed June 28, 1983 with a leakage of 2.34 SCF/D.
O g -,
- ,. .- a ----.-.w , --,m,m- m.,, , -
v m---o-
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued) r~' 2. Third Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
Penetration #91 The initial leak test was performed June 16, 1983. Valve
[VS-D-5-5A) would not hold the applied pressure. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 837014; the valve was cleaned and limits adjusted. The Type C retest was performed June 25, 1983 with a leakage of 0.462 SCF/D.
Airlock Solenoid Ecualization Valve Manual Isolation Valve The initial leak test was performed June 11, 1983. Valve (VS-153) would not hold the applied pressure. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 837511, and the valve was replaced. The Type C retest was performed July 15, 1983 with a leakage of 7.414 SCF/D.
It should be noted that (VS-153] will no longer be Type C tested.
The inlet to [VS-153) is from the inside containment equalization solenoid valves. These valves where removed during the Second Refueling, and the inlet to [VS-153) plugged. Should the solenoid equalization valves be reinstalled, [VS-153) would again be Type C tested.
O l 1
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKACE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 3. Fourth Refueling Type C LLRT Results CONTAINMENT AS FOUND AS LEFT ASSIGNED PENT VALVE DATE VALVE VALVE PENETRATION NO. MARK NO. TESTED LEAKAGE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D)
MOV-CC-112A2 X 0.465 0.465 1 11-12-84 3.95 CCR-247 X 3.95 3.95 MOV-CC-112B3 X 0.466 0.466 2 11-13-84 22.60 CCR-252 X 22.60 22.60 4
MOV-CC-112A3 X 7.44 7.44 4 11-12-84 124.20 CCR-251 X 124.20 124.20 i
MOV-CC-112B2 X 0.466 0.466 5 11-12-84 0.566 CCR-248 X 0.566 0.566 TV-CC-107D1 X 3.16 3.16 8 11-05-84 3.16 TV-CC-107D2 X 1.24 1.24 TV-CC-111D1 X 0.465 0.465
(\
~- 9 11-05-84 11.28 TV-CC-111D2 X 11.28 11.28 TV-CC-110D X 5.62 5.62 11 TV-CC-110F1 X 12-05-84 5.62 2.46 2.46 TV-CC-110F2 X i
FP-827 X 0.465 0.465 13 10-23-84 0.465 TV-FP-107 X 0.465 0.465 TV-CC-110E3 X 0.469 0.469 14 12-06-84 0.469 TV-CC-110E2 X 0.469 0.469
[
TV-CC-111A2 X 704.37 253.54 16 12-14-84 253.54 TV-CC-111A1 X 2 28 2.28 TV-CC-103B1 X 70.23 70.23 17 12-04-84 136.37 TV-CC-103B X 136.37 136.37 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 1 of 7 (SCF/D) 562.220
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 3. Fourth Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
('~h CONTAINMENT AS FOUND AS LEFT ASSIGNED PENT VALVE DATE VALVE VALVE PENETRATION NO. MARK NO. TESTED LEAKAGE LEAKAGE LEAYaGE IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D)
TV-CC-103C1 X 23.86 23.86 18 12-05-84 130.60 TV-CC-103C X 130.60 130.60 MOV-CH-378 X 34.80 34.80 19 CH-369 X 11-13-84 34.80 MOV-CH-381 X 0.465 0.465 SI-42 X 1.39 1.39 20 11-15-84 1.39 SI-41 X 0.465 0.465 RH-14 X 3.08 3.08 24 RH-16 X 10-31-84 4.21 RH-15 X 4.21 4.21 7- s TV-CC-105D1 X 176.24 65.55
() 25 TV-CC-105D2 X 12-04-84 34.90 34.90 65.55 TV-CC-107El X 177.92 75.20 26 12-10-84 . 75.20 TV-CC-107E2 X 6.25 6.25 TV-CC-105El X 33.90 33.90 27 11-05-84 33.90 TV-CC-105E2 X 0.564 0.564 TV-CH-200A X TV-CH-200B X 196.84 194.47 TV-CH-200C X 214.28 28 12-14-84 RV-CH-203 X 1.31 1.31 MOV-CH-142 X 55.92 18.50 TV-CH-204 X 0.465 0.465 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 2 of 7 (SCF/D) 559.930 0
8 '-
fl . C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 3. Fourth Refueling Typs C LIllT Razults (continusd)
(q PENT VALVE CONTAINMENT DATE AS FOUND VALVE AS LEFT VALVE ASSIGNED PENETRATION NO. MARK NO. TESTED LEAKAGE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D)
TV-DG-108A X 18.98 18.98 29 12-02-84 18.98 TV-DG-108B X 10.92 10.92 FP-804 X 0.694 0.694 31 10-20-84 0.694 TV-FP-105 X 0.462 0.462 FP-800 X 0.462 0.462 32 10 20-84 3.24 TV-FP-106 X 3.24 3.24 TV-DA-100A X 97.12 97.12
, 38 11-15-84 97.12 TV-DA-100B X 78.62 78.62 SA-15 X 1,91 1.91 42 12-02-84 3.17 SA-14 X 3.17 3.17 TV-CV-102-1 X 195.30 195.30 43 10-23-84 195.30 Os TV-CV-102 X 1.72 1.72 TV-CV-101A X 69.63 5.11 44 12-08-84 5.11 TV-CV-101B X (NOTE 1) 2.23 RC-72 X 120.76 0.470 45 12-09-84 39.30 TV-RC-519 X 0.466 39.30 IA-91 X 12.59 12.59 47 12-03-84 26.58 IA-90 X 26.58 26.58 TV-DG-109A2 X 0.464 0.464 48 10-25-84 0.464 TV-DG-109Al X 0.464 0.464 RC-68 X (NOTE 1) 23.03 49 10-29-84 23.03 TV-RC-101 X 7.41 7.41 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 3 of 7 (SCF/D) 412.988 1
NOTE 1 - COULD NOT PRESSURIZE INITIALLY.
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 3. Fourth Refuzling Typa C LLRT Rasults (continusd)
-~
3 CONTAINMENT AS FOUND AS LEFT ASSIGNED
() PENT NO.
VALVE MARK NO.
DATE TESTED VALVE LEAKAGE VALVE LEAKAGE PENETRATION LEAKAGE IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D) i TV-SI-101-2 X 24.56 24.56 53 10-24-84 24.56 TV-SI-101-1 X 24.09 24.09 TV-SS-109Al X 0.463 0.463 55-1 10-30-84 0.463 TV-SS-109A2 X 0.463 0.463 TV-LM-100A1 X 0.462 0.462 55-2 10-17-84 0.462 NOTE 2 TV-LM-100A2 X 0.462 0.462 TV-SS-111A1 X 0.463 0.463 55-4 10-30-84 0.463 TV-SS-111A2 X 0.463 0.463 TV-SS-100A1 X 0.463 0.463 56-1 10-27-84 0.741 TV-SS-100A2 X 0.741 0.741 TV-SS-102A1 X 0.463 0.463
) 56-2 TV-SS-102A2 X 10-26-84 0.463 0.463 0.463 TV-SS-105A1 X 93.20 93.20 56-3 12-11-84 93.20 TV-SS-105A2 X 46.60 46.60 TV-LM-101A X 10.62 10.62 57-3 10-17-84 10.62 CV-35 X 10.62 10.62 TV-LM-101B X 4.06 4.06 57-4 10-17-84 4.06 CV-36 X 3.32 3.32 TV-CC-103Al X 0.468 0.468 58 12-04-84 4.26 TV-CC-103A X 4.26 4.26 QS-4 X 46.29 46.29 63 11-04-84 171.30 MOV-QS-101B X 171.30 171.30 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 4 of 7 (SCF/D) 310.592 NOTE 2 INCLUDES PENETRATIONS 57-1,57-2, AND 97-3 VHICH ALSO SHARE THESE CNMT
- Os ISOLATION VALVES THROUCH A COMMON 4-WAY VALVE.
66-
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 3. Fourth Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
['} CONTAINMENT AS FOUND AS LEFT ASSIGNED V PENT VALVE DATE VALVE VALVE PENETRATION '
NO. MARK NO. TESTED LEAKAGE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE l IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D)
QS-3 X 0.464 0.464 64 11-02-84 0.464 MOV-QS-101A X 0.464 0.464 70 RS-101 X 10-22-84 17.62 17.62 17.62 l 71 RS-100 X 10-22-84 0.464 0.464 0.464 i
HY-120 X 0.829 0.896 87 12-07-84 1.71 HY-lli X 1.71 1.71
! HY-119 X 0.552 0.464 88 12-12-84 0.464 HY-110 X 17.95 0.464 AS-278 X 34.22 34.22 89 10-20-84 34.22 TV-SV-100A X 7.86 7.86
' 'f-~gt VS-D-5-3B X 90 11-01-84 233.22 18.56 18.56
', VS-D-5-3A X VS-D-5-5B X 91 VS-D-5-5A X 10-27-84 (NOTE 1) 8.83 8.83 i
VS-D-5-6 X TV-CV-150C
, & X 9.68 9.68 HY-102 92 10-17-84 18.45 TV-VC-150D
& X 18.45 18.45 I
HY-104 l TV-CV-150B
& X 4.61 4.61 4
HY-101 93 10-17-84 5.53 TV-CV-150A j & X 5.53 5.53 i HY-103 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 5 of 7 (SCF/D) 106.312 NOTE 1 - COULD NOT PREESURIZE INITIALLY.
i
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 3. Fourth Refueling Typs C LLRT Rasults (continued)
/"' CONTAINMENT AS FOUND AS LEFT h) PENT NO.
VALVE MARK NO.
DATE TESTED VALVE LEAKAGE VALVE LEAKAGE ASSIGNED PENETRATION LEAKAGE l IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D)
HCV-CV-151 X 0.463 0.463 94 10-19-84 6.02 HCV-VC-151-1 X 6.02 6.02 SOV-HY-102B1 X 0.461 0.461 95-64 10-16-84 0.461 SOV-HY-102B2 X 0.461 0.461 SOV-HY-103B1 X 0.461 0.461 95-69 10-16-84 0.461 SOV-HY-103B2 X 0.461 0.461 SOV-HY-104B1 X 0.461 0.461 95-72 10-16-84 0.461 SOV-HY-104B2 X 0.461 0.461 TV-SS-104A1 X 0.464 0.464 '
97-1 11 03-84 0.464 TV-SS-104A2 X 0.464 0.464 TV-SS-103Al X 0.464 0.464 97-2 11-03-84 0.464 O- TV-SS-103A2 X 0.464 0.464 I
PC-38 X 0.462 0.462 103 10-18-84 5.54 PC-37 X 5.54 5.54 PC-9 X 0.463 0.463 104 10-19-84 0.463 PC-10 X 0.463 0.463 i TV-SS-112Al X 0.463 0.463 105-2 10-30-84 0.463 TV-SS-112A2 X 0.463 0.463 MOV-SI-842 X 0.467 0.472 106 12-07-84 0.472 TV-SI-889 X 0.467 0.467 SOV-HY-102A1 X 0.461 0.461 109-44 10-16-84 0.461 4
SOV-HY-102A2 X 0.461 0.461
! TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 6 of 7 15.730 (SCF/D) lo I
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST REFULTS (continued) )
- 3. Fourth Refualing Typs C LLRT Rasults (continued)
O PENT NO.
VALVE MARK NO.
CONTAINMENT DATE TESTED AS FOUND VALVE LEAKAGE AS LEFT VALVE LEAKAGE ASSIGNED PENETRATION LEAKAGE IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D)
SOV-HY-103Al X 0.461 0.461 109-49 10-16-84 0.461 SOV-HY-103A2 X 0.461 0.461 SOV-HY-104A1 X 0.461 0.461 109-52 10-16-84 0.461 SOV-HY-104A2 X 0.461 0.461 RC-277 X 0.463 0.463 110-1 10-16-84 0.463 RC-278 X 0.463 0.463 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 7 of 7 (SCF/D) 1.385 i
TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 1 (SCF/D) 562.220 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 2 (SCF/D) 559.930
- TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 3 (SCF/D) 412.,988 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 4 (SCF/D) 310.592 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 5 (SCF/D) 106.312
]
TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 6 (SCF/D) 15.730 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 7 1.385 (SCF/D)
TOTAL CONTAINMENT TYPE C LEAKAGE - SUM OF SHEETS 1 THRU 7 (SCF/D) 1969.157 4
i I
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKACE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
O 3. Fourth Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
V Penetration #16 The initial leak test was performed November 30, 1984. Valve
[TV-CC-111A2] leaked at 704.37 SCF/D. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 848751; the plug was cleaned and the valve repacked. The Type C retest was performed December 9, 1984 with a leakage of 942.80 SCF/D. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 848758; the seat, stem, and plug were replaced. The Type C retest was performed on December 14, 1984 with a leakage of 253.54 SCF/D.
Penetration #25 The initial leak test was performed November 3, 1984. Valve
[TV-CC-105Dl] leaked at 176.24 SCF/D. Initiated Maintenance Work
/"N Request 848316; the seat and plug were cleaned, the bonnet gasket t
and packing were replaced. The Type C retest was performed December 4,1984 with a leakage of 65.55 SCF/D.
Penetration #26 4
The initial leak test was performed December 4, 1984. Valve (TV-CC-107E1] leaked at 177.92 SCF/D. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 848756; the seat and plug were cleaned, the bonnet gasket, seat ring gasket, and packing were replaced. The Type C j retest was performed December 12, 1984 with a leakage of 75.20 SCF/D.
Penetration #28 The initial leak test was performed November 16, 1984. Valves (TV-CH 200A,B,6 C] leaked at a combined rate of 196.84 SCF/D, O
+ - - - - , , - ,+- - . - - -,,.-,_,y -.--....,---_wy,_.n - , , - .-.--,e,. ,wm,4-,-,,ye ,,__,we,,mm- - - -,rg- -----. pg- ,-g -
r------ s-. .
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
[v 3. Fourth Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
Penetration a28 (continued)
(RV-CH-203] and (MOV-CH-142] leaked at a combined rate _f 56.39 SCF/D. The following Maintenance Work Requests were initiated prior to the initial leak test:
MWR 842491 -
Replace valve [RV-CH-203] due to a crack in the valve body.
MWR 848407 -
Preventive maintenance replacement of the valve operator diagram for (TV-CH-200A].
MWR 848408 - Same as 848407 except for (TV-CH-200B].
(}
v MWR 848409 - Same as 848407 except for (TV-CH-200C].
The first Type C retest was performed November 28, 1984. Valve (RV-CH-203] leaked at a rate of 1.310 SCF/D. Valves (TV-CH-200A,B,& C] would not hold the applied pressure. The trip valve operator limits were adjusted to allow the plugs to seat properly. The second retest of (TV-CH-200A,B,6 C] was performed December 2,1984 with a combined leakage of 19'+.47 SCF/D.
The valve motor on [MOV-CH-142] burned ouc and was replaced along with the overload relays under Maintenance Work Request 848453.
Also Maintenance Work Request 848455 clean the limit switches and adj usted the Limitorque Modutronic unit. The Type C retest was performed December 11, 1984 with a leakage of 9.380 SCF/D.
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
/^\ 3. Fourth Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
U Penetration #28 (continued)
When closing the motor operator cover after cleaning the limit switches, a wire was inadvertently pinched. This caused the motor on (MOV-CH-142] to burn out a second time. Maintenance Work Request 848456 was initiated to replace the motor and Modutronic unit. The type C retest was performed December 14, 1984 with a leakage of 18.50 SCF/D.
Penetration #44 The initial leak test was performed October 31, 1984. Valve ,
(TV-CV-101A] leaked at 69.63 SCF/D, and (TV-CV-101B] would not hold the applied pressure. Initiated Maintenance Work Request
] 848315 for (TV-CV-101A), and 848314 for (TV-CV-101B]. The seat
[U ring gasket, body to bonnet gasket, packing, and plug insert were replaced on both valves. These valves were retested December 8, 1984 with a leakage for (TV-CV-101A] of 5.110 SCF/D, and a leakage for (TV-CV-101B] of 2.230 SCF/D.
Penetration #45 The initial leak test was performed October 25, 1984. Valve (RC-72] leaked at 120.76 SCF/D, and (TV-RC-519] leaked at 0.466 SCF/D. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 847241 for (RC-72],and 1 the body to bonnet gasket was replaced. The Type C retest was performed December 9, 1984 with a leakage of 0.470 SCF/D.
Subsequent to the initial leak test, (TV-RC-519] developed a body to bonnet leak. Maintenance Work Request 848347 replaced the lower diaphragm. The Type C retest of (TV-RC-519] was performed November 29, 1984 with a leakage of 39.30 SCF/D.
o
4 II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
% 3. Fourth Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
/Y
\~s Penetration #49 The initial leak test was performed October 29, 1984. Valve
[RC-68] would not hold the applied pressure. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 843805; the disc, spring, and bonnet gasket were replaced. The seat surfaces were polished with lapping compound. The Type C retest was performed November 29, 1984 with a leakage of 23.03 SCF/D.
Penetration #87 The initial leak test was performed October 20, 1984. Valve ,
[HY-120] leaked at 0.829 SCF/D. However [HY-120] lifted before ,
the minimum DP of 1.2 PSI when lift tested. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 830643; the seat and gate were cleaned, and the disc and bonnet gasket were replaced. The Type C retest was performed October 29, 1984 with a leakage of 1.71 SCF/D.
[HY-120] again failed the lift test.
A weight was installed on the counterweight arm of the check valve and the valve retested, with a leakage of 0.896 SCF/D, and an acceptable lift pressure.
Penetration #88 The initial leak test was performed October 13, 1984. Valve (HY-110] leaked 17.95 SCF/D, and valve [HY-119] leaked at 0.552 SCF/D, but failed the check valve lift test.
Initiated Maintenance Work Request 847238 for [HY-119]. The seat and gate were cleaned, and the disc and bonnet gaskets were
/ replaced.
4 V}
l II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEARACE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
[ 3. Fourth Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
V}
Penetration #88 (continued) 4 The Type C retest was performed October 29, 1984. Valve (HY-119]
leaked at 0.552 SCF/D, but failed the check valve lift test.
Initiated Maintenance Work Request 847238; the seat and gate were cleaned, and the disc and bonnet gaskets were replaced. The Type C retest was performed October 29, 1984 with a leakge of 5.07 SCF/D; however, the lift pressure was unacceptable.
l [HY-119] was disassembled, all parts were cleaned, the 0-ring, rock shaft gland flex-gasket, and Woodruff key were replaced. In i addition a weight was installed on the weight arm. The Type C ,
retest was performed December 7, 1984. Valve (HY-119] leaked at 2.45 SCF/D, and had an acceptable lift pressure.
O The initial leak test for (HY-110] was performed October 13, 1984 with a leakage of 17.95 SCF/D. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 848311; all parts were cleaned , the ball, stem, seats, l O-ring, and seals were replaced. A Type C retest was performed December 12, 1984 for (NY-110] and (HY-119] with a leakage for
] both valves of 0.464 SCF/D.
Penetration #90 1
4 i The initial leak test was performed October 25, 1984. The t
i penetration (pressurized between CIV's) leaked at 233.22 SCF/D.
I Initiated Maintenance Work Request 847242, and the motor operator limits for (VS-D-5-3A] were adjusted to allow the valve to fully t close. The Type C retest was performed November 1, 1984 with a penetration leakage of 18.56 SCF/D.
lO, l
1
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 3. Fourth Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
Penetration #91 The initial leak test was performed October 25, 1984. The penetration (pressurized between CIV's) would not hold the applied pressure. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 848301, and the motor operator limits for (VS-D-5-5A] were adjusted to allow the valve to fully close. The Type C retest was performed October 27, 1984 with a leakage of 8.83 SCF/D.
Penetration #106 The initial leak test was performed November 11, 1984. Valves .
(MOV-SI-842] and (TV-SI-889] both leaked at 0.467 SCF/D.
Subsequent to the initial leak test the motor operator on (MOV-SI-842] was replaced by Design Change Package 351. The Type C retest was performed December 7,1984 with a leakage of 0.472 SCF/D.
i i
()
75-
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 4. Fifth Refueling Type C LLRT Results
] '
]/ PENT VALVE CONTAINMENT DATE AS FOUND AS LEFT ASSIGNED VALVE VALVE PENETRATION NO. MARK NO. TESTED LEAKAGE LEAKAGE LEAKACE IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D)
MOV-CC-112A2 X 0.463 0.463 1 06-20-86 0.562 CCR-247 X 0.562 0.562 MOV-CC-112E3 X 5.09 5.09 2 06-20-86 134.83 CCR-252 X 134.83 134.83 MOV-CC-112A3 X 0.462 0.462 4 6-20-86 123.48 CCR-251 X 123.48 123.48 MOV-CC-112B2 X 2.32 2.32 5 06-20-86 16.29 CCR-248 X 16.29 16.29 '
l TV-CC-107D1 X 0.836 0.836 8 05-24-86 0.836 TV-CC-107D2 X 0.563 0.563
! TV-CC-111D1 X 6.01 6.01
' O. 9 TV-CC-111D2 X 05-23-86 0.561 0.561 6.01 TV-CC-110D X 5.56 5.56 11 TV-CC-110F1 X 06-17-86 5.56 0.582 0.582 TV-CC-110F2 X FP 827 X 0.463 0.463
- 13 08-05-86 191.24 TV-FP-107 X 74.14 191.24 TV-CC-110E3 X 0.463 0.463 14 06-17-86 0.463 l TV-CC-110E2 X 0.463 0.463 TV-CC-111A2 X 1109.97 177.08 16 06-12-86 177.08 TV CC 111A1 X 67.35 67.35 TV-CC 103B1 X 0.462 0.462 17 06-25-86 34.80 TV-CC 103B X 34.80 34.80 TOTAL PENETRATION IEAKACE SHEET 1 of 7 (SCF/D) 691.151 i
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 4. Fifth Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
CONTAINMENT AS FOUND AS LEFT ASSIGNED O- PENT VALVE DATE VALVE VALVE PENETRATION NO. MARK NO. TESTED LEAKAGE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/0)
TV-CC-103Cl X 2.77 2.77 18 06-12-86 17.94 TV-CC-103C X 17.94 17.94 MOV-CH-378 X 25.91 25.91 19 CH-369 X 06-16-86 25.91 MOV-CH-381 X 0.463 0.463 4
SI-42 X 0.788 0.788
, 20 06-11-86 0.788 SI-41 X 0.464 0.464 4
RH-14 X 21.96 1.47 24 RH-16 X 06-21-86 0.462 0.462 1.93 RH-15 X 0.462 0.462
} TV-CC-105D1 X 34.70 34.70 j
() 25 TV-CC-105D2 X 05-29-86 10.60 10.60 34.70 TV-CC-107El X 55.50 50.83 l 26 05-29-86 , 50.83
- TV CC-107E2 X 1.63 1.63 l
I TV-CC-105El X 64.81 64.81
' 27 05 24-86 64.81 TV-CC-105E2 X 0.562 0.562
]
TV CH-200A X TV-CH-200B X 2747.18 13.89 TV-CH-200C X l 28 06-20-86 1
RV-CH 203 X 0.452 0.462 e5.22 MOV CH 142 X 106.37 50.87 TV CH-204 X 0.462 0.462 1
i TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 2 of 7 (SCF/D) 262.128 1
lO i
l i
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 4. Fifth Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
CONTAINMENT AS FOUND AS LEFT ASSIGNED
('"'}/
x,, PENT VALVE DATE VALVE VALVE PENETRATION NO. MARK NO. TESTED LEAXAGE LEAXAGE LEAYAGE IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D)
TV-DG-108A X 12.50 12.50 29 06 03-86 12.50 TV-DG-108B X 12.04 12.04 FP-804 X 0.462 0.462 31 06-14-86 3.33 TV-FP-105 X 3.33 3.33 FP-800 X 0.462 0.462 32 06-14-86 9.71 TV-FP-106 X 9.71 9.71 TV-DA-100A X 69.44 69.44 38 06-11-86 69.44 TV-DA-100B X 5.56 5.56 SA-15 X 4.72 4.72 42 05-22-86 4.72 SA-14 X 4.72 4.72 TV CV-102-1 X 216.96 216.96 O 43 TV-CV-102 X 05-20-86 4.62 4.62 216.96 TV-CV-101A X 4.37 4.37 44 05 20-86 4.37 TV-CV-101B X 1.80 1.80 RC-72 X 69.24 33.30 45 06 02-86 33.30 TV-RC-519 X 0.463 0.464 IA-91 X 25,41 25.41 47 05 26-86 25.41 IA 90 X 3.79 3.79 TV-DG-109A2 X 4.62 4.62 48 06 03-86 5.08 TV-DG-109Al X 5.08 5.08 RC-68 X 36.57 36.57 49 06-16-86 36.57 TV RC 101 X 0.741 0.741 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 3 of 7 (SCP/D) 421.390
, O
- -- - . .. - _ _ . - - - - ~-.
4 II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued) j 4. Fifth Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
CONTAINMENT AS FOUND AS LEFT A3 SIGNED l O-
\
PENT VALVE DATE VALVE VALVE PENETRATION NO. MARK ~NO. TESTED LEAKAGE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE
- IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D)
TV-SI-101-2 X 7.52 7.52 53 06-17-86 7.52 TV-SI-101-1 X 4.70 4.70 i'
TV-SS-109Al X 0.461 0.461 55-1 05-28-86 0.461 TV-SS-109A2 X 0.461 0.461 i TV-LM-100A1 X 0.463 0.463 55-2 05-24-86 0.463 NOTE 1 TV-LM-100A2 X 0.463 0.463 I TV-SS-111A1 X 1.01 1.01 55-4 05-28-86 1.47 TV-SS-111A2 X 1.47 1.47 i TV-SS-100A1 X 0.460 0.460 .
l 56-1 05-28-86 0.460 i TV-SS-100A2 X 0.460 0.460 l
l TV-SS-102A1 X 0.464 0.464
' 56-2 05-22-86 0.464 TV-SS-102A2 X 0.464 0.464 I
TV-SS-105A1 X 51.07 0.465 56 3 05-20 86 0.465 TV-SS-105A2 X 185.69 0.465 ^
l
- i. TV-LM-101A X 6.47 6.47 l 57-3 05 24 8 7 39
! CV-35 X 7.39 7.39
- TV-LM-101B X 3.28 3.28 57-4 05-28-86 3.28 l CV-36 X 2.50 2.50 l TV-CC-103Al X 0.463 0.463 j 58 06-13-86 5.17 l TV CC-103A X 5.17 5.17 QS-4 X 0.461 0.463
- 63 06-16-86 0.463 MOV-QS-101B X 0.461 0.463 i
TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKACE SHEEI 4 of 7 (SCF/D) 27.606 l NOTE 1 - INCLUDES PENETRATIONS 57-1,57 2, AND 97-3 UHICH ALSO SHARE THESE CNMT i ISOLATION VALVES THROUCH A COMMON 4 VAY VALVE.
i j 4 1 l -- . _ . __.._ _ - , _ ., - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ - _ _
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
( j PENT VALVE DATE VALVE VALVE PENETRATION NO. MARK NO. TESTED LEAKAGE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D)
QS-3 X 2.31 2.31 64 06-13-86 2.31 MOV-QS-101A X 1.20 0.462 70 RS-101 X 05-26-86 0.462 0.462 0.462 71 RS-100 X 05-26-86 0.461 0.461 0.461 HY-196 X~ 0.458 0.458 87 05-27-86 1.02 HY-111 X 1.02 1.02 (NOTE 1)
HY-197 X 0.735 0.735
- 88 05-27-86 0.735 HY-110 X 0.461 0.461 (NOTE 1)
AS-278 X 129.26 7.83 89 -
05-28-86 9.69 T'-SV-100A X 9.69 9.69 VS-D-5-3B X 90 05-27-86 0.462 0.463 0.463 VS-D-5 3A X VS-D-5-5B X 91 VS-D-5-5A X 05-27-86 3.47 0.463 0.463 VS-D-5-6 X TV-CV-150C
& X 8.06 8.06 HY-102 92 05-20-86 26.26 TV-VC 150D
& X 26.26 26.26 HY-104 TV-CV-150B
& X 13.36 11.04 HY-101 93 05-20-86 17.05 TV CV-150A
& X 17.05 17.05 HY-103
{
. TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 5 of 7 (SCF/D) 58.914 NOTE 1 REFER TO SECTION II.C.4, PG. 86 & 87 FOR MODIFICATIONS MADE TO PENT 87 &
88 BY DCP 621, i l I e .
i II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 4. Fifth Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
CONTAINMENT AS FOUND AS LEFT ASSIGNED (V~} PENT VALVE DATE VALVE VALVE PENETRATION NO. MARK NO. TESTED LEAKAGE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D)
?
HCV-CV-151 X 0.463 0.463 94 06-14-86 0.925 HCV-VC-151-1 X 60.24 0.925 SOV-HY-102B1 X 0.462 0.462 95-64 05-20-86 0.462 SOV HY-102B2 X 0.462 0.462
- SOV-NY-103B1 X 0.462 0.462 2
95-69 05-20-86 0.462 SOV-HY-103B2 X 0.462 0.462 i
SOV-NY-104B1 X 0.462 0.462 95-72 05-20-86 0.462
! SOV-NY-104B2 X 0.462 0.462 TV-SS-106Al X 0.462 0.462 97-1 05-30-86 0.462 TV-SS-104A2 X 0.462 0.462
. TV-SS-103Al X 0.459 0.459 i 97-2 05-30-86 0.459 TV-SS-103A2 X 0.459 0.459 PC-38 X 0.463 0.463 103 05-21-86 0.463 PC-37 X 0.463 0.463 i PC-9 X 0.463 0.463 104 05-21-86 0.463 PC-10 X 0.463 0.463
! TV-SS-112A1 X 2.39 2.39 105-2 05-30 86 2.75 TV-SS-112A2 X 2.75 2.75 MOV-SI-842 X 0.462 0.462 106 06 10-86 0.462 TV SI 889 X 0.462 0.462 i
! SOV HY-102A1 X 0.462 0 . '+ 6 2
) 109-44 05-20 86 0.462
! SOV HY-102A2 X 0.462 0.462 l
7.832 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 6 of 7 (SCF/D) i
! 81-f
-g-n. ,,.-,-----,--,-m, _-,..v.,---, , . .-,.-_a,~,,.,, - ,
.,,.,--,,_.v..__.,. ., -y, ,,,,,.,a.,. a-,
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 4. Fifth Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
^
CONTAINMENT AS FOUND AS LEFT ASSIGNED PENT VALVE DATE VALVE VALVE PENETRATION NO. MARK NO. TESTED LEAKAGE LEAKAGE LEAKAGE IN OUT (SCF/D) (SCF/D) (SCF/D) l SOV-NY-103Al X 0.462 0.462 109-49 05-20-86 0.462 SOV-HY-103A2 X 0.462 0.462 SOV-KY-104A1 X 0.462 0.462 109-52 05-20-86 0.462 SOV-HY-104A2 X 0.462 0.462 RC-277 X 0.463 0.463 110-1 06-02-86 0.463 RC-278 X 0.463 0.463 t
VS-169 X 0.462 0.462 VS-170 X 0.462 0.462 P.A.L. 06-03-86 (NOTE 1)
VS-167 X 0.462 0.462 VS-168 X 0.462 0.462 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 7 of 7 (SCF/D) 1.387 NOTE 1 - THE ASSIGNED PENETRATION LEAKAGE FOR THESE VALVES IS ADDED WITH THE PERSONNEL AIRLOCK OVERALL TYPE B LEAKAGE, AND NOT INCLUDED IN THE TYPE C TOTAL. P.A.L. - PERSONNEL AIRLOCK TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 1 (SCF/D) 691.151 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 2 (SCF/D) 262.128 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 3 (SCF/D) 421.390 i
TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 4 (SCF/D) 27.606 1 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 5 (SCF/D) 58.914 I
TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 6 (SCF/D) 7.832 TOTAL PENETRATION LEAKAGE SHEET 7 (SCF/D) 1.387 TOTAL CONTAINMENT TYPE C LEAKAGE - SUM OF SHEETS 1 THRU 7 (SCF/D) 1470.408 i
I
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 4. Fifth Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
Penetration #13 The initial leak test was performed June 14, 1986. Valve (TV-FP-107] leaked at 74.14 SCF/D. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 866292. The valve was rebuilt under Design Change Package 770. The valve trim was replaced with a later design trim, which is better suited for tight shutoff applications.
Also the valve bonnet required modification to the accept the new trim. The Type C retest was performed on August 5, 1986, with a leakage of 191.24 SCF/D.
Penetration #16 .
1 The initial leak test was performed June 12. 1986. Valve (TV-CC-lllA2] leaked at 1109.97 SCF/D. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 866285; the valve plug was machined to remove a small nick, and also to allow full compression of the seat ring gasket. The valve actuator was rebuilt to correct misalignment between the actuator stem and plug stem. The Type C retest was performed July 12, 1986, with a leakage of 177.08 SCF/D.
Penetration #24 The initial leak test was performed June 21, 1986. Valve [RH-14]
leaked at 21.96 SCF/D. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 860908
, due to binding when operating (RH-14]. The stem nut was lubricated and the valve cycled. The Type C retest was performed June 23, 1986, with a leakage of 1.47 SCF/D.
l l
83-
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued) t 4 Fifth Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
U Penetration #26 The initial leak test was performed May 24, 1986. Valve (TV-CC-107E1] leaked at 55.50 SCF/D. The valve actuator diaphgram was replaced under Maintenance Work Request 865306 as part of the preventive maintenance program. The Type C retest was performed May 29, 1986 with a leakage of 50.83 SCF/D.
Penetration #28 The initial leak test was performed June 20, 1986. The valves (TV-CH-200A,B,& C] leaked at a combined rate of 2747.18 SCF/D, ,
and (MOV-CH-142] leaked at 106.37 SCF/D. The following Maintenance Work Requests were initiated:
O MVR 866294 - Replace bonnet gasket and packin5 on (TV-CH-200A].
MWR 866295 - Same as 866294 except for (TV-CH-200B]. ,
MUR 866296 -
The valve stem, bonnet gasket, and packing were replaced on (TV-CH-200C].
i MWR 866297 - The Limitorque Modutronic unit was adjusted to allow the valve to fully open and close.
The Type C retest for (TV-CH-200A,B, & C] was performed on July 1, 1986, with a leakage of 13.89 SCF/D. The Type C retest for (MOV CH 142] was performed on June 28, 1986, with a leakage of 50.87 SCF/D.
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 4. Fifth Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
V l Zenetration a45 The initial leak test was performed May 30, 1986. Valve [RC-72]
leaked at 69.24 SCF/D, and (TV-RC-519] leaked at 0.463 SCF/D.
Initiated Maintenance Work Request 866278 for (RC-72]; the locating pin was shortened and the body to bonnet gasket replaced. The Type C retest was performed May 31, 1986 with a leakage of 33.30 SCF/D.
. Subsequent to the initial leak test, (TV-RC-519] developed a body to bonnet leak. Maintenance Work Request 866327 replaced the lower diaphragm. The Type C retest of (TV-RC-519] was performed- .
on June 2,1986 with a leakage of 0.464 SCF/D.
Penetration s56-3 The initial leak test was performed May 22, 1986. Valve (TV-SS-105A1] leaked at 51.07 SCF/D, and valve (TV-SS-10fA2]
leaked at 185.69 SCF/D. Initiated Maintenance Work Requesti 866287 for (TV-SS-105A1] and 866274 for (TV SS-105A2]. On both valves the repairs consisted of replacing the springs in the bonnet area and the seat springs, the seats were lapped, and the magnetic pins were replaced. The Type C retest was performed on July 12, 1986 for (TV-SS-105Al] and (TV-SS-105A2] with a leakage for each valve of 0.465 SCF/D.
4 Penetration e63 The initial leak test was performed June 16, 1986. Valve (MOV-QS-101B] leaked at 0.461 SCF/D, and valve (QS-4] leaked at 0.46L SCF/D. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 866289 due to
! binding when (QS-4) was cycled. Boron was cleaned from the pivot l
. . - - - - . . - , _ , . _ . - - , . , , _ . . . _ _ . . _ . . -,,,-,,n. ,.,.,,,,..---,._---,n_. . , . ..,._.,.,,,.,,,n - - - - - - - - - - - , , _ . . - . , . , - - , , - .
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
(3
/
%J l 4. Fifth Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
Penetration #63 (continued) shaft and adj usted counterarm weights to manufacter's specifications. The Type C retest was periormed July 1,1986 with a leakage of 0.461uSCF/D.
Maintenance Work Request 860051 was previously initiated due to a valve stroking problem for (MOV-QS-101B]. Investigation revealed a defective torque switch; the switch was replaced and adjusted.
The Type C retest was performed July 4, 1986 with a leakage of 0.461 SCF/D.
Penetration #64
() The initial leak test was performed June
[MOV-QS-101A] leaked at 1.20 SCF/D. Maintenance Work Request 13, 1986. Valve 851581 was previouly initiated due to a build-up of boron around the valve bonnet area. The body to bonnet gasket and packing were replaced. The Type C retest was performed June 26, 1986 with a leakage of 0.462 SCF/D.
i Penetration #87 DCP 621, "Enviromental Qualification Modification for Hydrogen Recombiners", changed the containment isolation valve (CIV) configuration of this penetration. This change occured after completion of the initial Type C test and ILRT performance.
Penetration #87 is the H 2 Recombiner return to containment.
The original CIV configuration consisted of a weighted arm check valve [RY-120] inside containment, and a manual ball valve
II.C TYPE C LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
[Vs
- 4. Fifth Refueling Type C L1RT Results (continued)
Penetration m87 (continued)
(HY-ill] outside containment in series. The DCP 621 modified CIV configuration consists of two manual ball valves outside containment, (HY-111] and (HY-196]. [HY-111] remains in its original posistion, and [HY-196] was added downstream of (HY-111]
in series. The internals for (HY-120] were removed only, and the valve body remains in the line.
The initial leak test was performed on 5-27-86 with a leakage of 1.11 SCF/D for (HY-120], and 1.02 SCF/D for (HY-111). The Type C test for (HY-196] was performed on 8-21-86 with a leakage of 0.458 SCF/D.
p Penetration #88 The same modifications performed for Penetration #87 (Train B) were also performed for Penetration #88 (Train A). The additionel ball valve added was (HY-197] , and the inter'nals were-removed from (HY-119].
The initial leak test was performed on 5-27-86 with a leakage of 1.80 SCF/D for (HY-il9), and 0.461 SCF/D for (HY-110]. The Type C test for (HY-197] was performed on 8-21-86 with a leakage of 0.735 SCF/D.
Penetration #89 The initial leak test was performed May 28, 1986. Valve (AS-278]
leaked at 129.26 SCF/D. Initiated Maintenance Work Request 8(6277; disassembled valve, cleaned and lubricated internals, and replaced the bonnet gasket. The Type C retest was performed May ,
1
( 30, 1986 with a leakage of 7.83 SCF/D.
l
~
II.C Ufj C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
- 4. Fifth Refueling Type C LLRT Results (continued)
Penetration #90 The initial leak test was performed May 27, 1986. Valves (VS-D-5-3A] and (VS-D-5-3B] leaked at 0.462 SCF/D (pressurized be tween CIV's). Subsequent to the initial leak test the open limit on (VS-D-5-3A] and (VS-D-5-3B] was reduced for refueling closure time requirements, and readjusted to the full open after completion of refueling.
A Typs C retest was performed after the limits were readjusted from the refueling settin5, and it was determined that (VS-D-5-3A] was not fully closing. Under Maintenance Work ,
Request 857440 the motor operator on (VS-D-5-3A] was tested using a MOVATS analyzer. The limit and torque switches were adjusted to
/'% optium position as determined by the analyzer. The Type C retest N was performed July 21, 1986 with a penetration leakage of 0.463 SCF/D.
Penstration #93 The initial leak test was performed May 20, 1986. Valve (HY-101]
and (TV-CV-150B] leaked at a combined rate of 13.36 SCF/D.
Following the initial leak test, (HY-101] was found not to be fully opening. Maintenance Work Request 860872 was initiated; the Teflon seats and stem seals were replaced. The Type C retest was performed August 8, 1986 with a leakage of 11.04 SCF/D.
Penetration #94 The initial leak test was performed June 3, 1986. Valve
[HCV-CV-151-1] leaked at 60.24 SCF/D. Initiated Maintenance Work
(
\- '
Request 866280; valve seat was lapped, and the pivot pin replaced. The Type C retest was performed June 13, 1986 with a leakage of 0.925 SCF/D.
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
O 5. Interim Fuel Cycle Type C LLRT results
- a. Third Fuel Cycle No Type C LLRT's were performed during the Third Fuel Cycle
- b. Fourth Fuel Cycle No Type C LLRT's were performed during the Fourth Fuel Cycle ,
- c. Fifth Fuel Cycle Penetration #45 (04-20-85)
Valve (TV-RC-519] developed a body to bonnet leak, and a correspondin5 PG water leak. The lower diaphragm was s
replaced. The Type C retest was performed on 4-20-86 with a leakage of 0.507 SCF/D.
I 1
Penetration m.9Q (05-02-85)
The plant was in Mode 5 for maintenance, and containment purge supply and exhaust (Pent 90 and 91) was in service. Prior to establishin5 containment integrity for entry into Mode 4, the surveillance BVT 1.5 -
1.47.12 1 was performed for Penetrations 90 and 91. This surveillance ensures that these valves are fully closed and seated prior to entering Mode 4, and is performed each time these are opened.
Valve (VS-D-5-3A) was determined not to be not fully closing.
The motor operator closed limit was adjusted, and a Type C retest was performed on 5-2-85 with a leakage of 1.38 SCF/D.
() 1 BVT 1.5 - 1.47.12 performs a pressure test on Pent 89, 90, and 91.
This surveillance has been in effect since the Fifth Refueling.
II.C TYPE C - LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS (continued)
O c. Fifth Fuel Cycle Type C LLRT Results (continued)
Penetration a3 (05-02-85)
Same as for Penetration #91 except valve [VS-D-5-5A] was not closing fully. On 5-2-85, after closed limit adjustment, a Type C retest was performed with a leakage of 0.461 SCF/D.
i .
O
- O 1
l l
._,.__.__.._______.._._..__,._-..____,___.___,_._._,...,__.m,,,_,.___,_-._,,_,.,._,..-
II.D TYPE B and C LOCAL LEAKAGE RATE TEST RES LTS
SUMMARY
O 1. Third Refueling Total Type C Assigned Leak. age -------------
2208.560 SCF/D Total Type B LIRT's (Elect. Pent) ---------
40.2 SCF/D Total Type B LLRT's (Mech Pent) -----------
211.88 SCF/D Total Containment LIRT Leakage ------------
2460.640 SCF/D 2460.640 / 6489.801 - 0.379 La Acceptance Criteria s 0.60 La
- 2. Fourth Refueling Total Type C Assigned Leakage -------------
1969.157 SCF/D .
Total Type B LIRT's (Elect. Pent) ---------
35.7 SCF/D Total Type B LIRT's (Mech Pent) -----------
3.27 SCF/D Total Containment LLRT Leakage ------------
2008.127 SCF/D 2008.127 / 6489.801 - 0.309 La Acceptance Criteria $ 0.60 La i
- 3. Fifth Fueling l Total Type C Assigned Leakage -------------
1470.408 SCF/D Total Type B LIRT's (Elect. Pent) ---------
31.9 SCF/D Total Type B LIRT's (Mech Pent) -----------
44.8 SCF/D Total Containment LLRT Leakage -- ---------
1547.108 SCF/D 1
1547.108 / 6489.80 - 0.238 La Acceptance Criteria s 0.60 La 1
La - 6489.8 SCF/D
k
'Af M Teiepnone (412) sea-sooo c '* October 15, 1986 fo'*e'o'x 4 q Shippingport, PA 15077 Ooo4 NDISS1:2932 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Was hington , D. C. 20555
Reference:
Beaver Valley Power Station Unit No.1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 Integrated Leakage Rate Test Results Report Gentlemen:
Enclosed is the 1986 Beave r Valley Integrated Leakage Rate Test Results Report submitted in accordance with Appendix J of 10 CFR Part 50.
The report provides a summary of the results of the Integrated Leakage Rate Test conducted at BVPS Unit No.1 during the Fifth Refueling Outage.
Also submitted with this report is a summary of results for all Local Leakage Rate Testing performed since the previous Integrated Leakage Rate Test.
Very truly yours,
%mR W. S. Lace?
Attachment Plant Manager cc: Mr. W. M. Troskoski, Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Beaver Valley Power Station Shippingport, PA 15077 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. Peter S. Tam, Project Manager Phillips Building 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda , MD 20814 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission f c/o Document Management Branch Washington, D. C. 20555 o(
i Director, Safety Evaluation & Control Virginia Electric & Power Company P.O. Box 26666 One James River Plaza Richmond, VA 23261