ML20215J416
| ML20215J416 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/27/1986 |
| From: | Stello V NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | Palladino NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20215J166 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-86-53, FOIA-86-54, FOIA-86-55, FOIA-86-A-24, FOIA-86-A-25, FOIA-86-A-26 860127-3, NUDOCS 8610240434 | |
| Download: ML20215J416 (7) | |
Text
..wegoame.a w - 6 em, % Wm W.
IlVCLASSiflED
' DISTRIBUTION: EDO 001340 L.JDavidson CCudd DKasun Roe y g7 g RBurnett Rehm DMausshardt Sneizek JDavis Shea WBrown Cunningham HDiORAllDUH FOR: Chatman Palladino VStello Denton MBridgers Taylor FR0ft:
Victor Stello, Jr.
AHoadley DEisenhut Acting Executive Director for Operations
SUBJECT:
STAFF REQUIRDIEf(TS FOR DESIGil BASIS THREAT HEETING if1TH CODlISSION JAtlUARY 28,1986 (v)
L 0)This brief surnary of past and ongoing staff action related to threat considerations if, provided in response to your January 15, 1986 menorandum, above subject.
Greater detail will be provided during the Connission briefing scheduled for January 28, 1986.
(S) l i.
Lc' i
i l
2 (C
il m (In l 851 O ' j -o PB O Q vidson, t#tSS eence>
42-74 8
"""^" ' I RECORD COPY, fM3
[
w2c roxu m no,soi nn ew ouo OFF
,p
~;-
6 tmgi.AS9ild
~
Chairman Palladino
-2.
I w
(u)There are other ongoing activities related to the subject. For example, NRC has proposed to the DOE that a joint NRC/00E group be fonned to identify DOE and NRC facilities processing similar weapons usable material. The staff has prepared a proposed action plan for completing this review (Enclosure 1) that will also address the iss.ue of comparability for those facilities identified by the joint working group.
~
(_t.
i Y
- - = = = - - = =
==
=
=
- =
- 5. h~
C 2[ _
~
~ ~
llHCLASSl1 3-Chairman Palladino r
Ie (p) described abye involve refinment to guard training activities, security Other complementary actions which are independent of any of the options officer certification and response force exercises. These are being considered by the staff.
e staff is prepared to discuss in greater detail the above itens at the upconing Comission briefing.
Original signed by Victor Stello Victor Stello. Jr.
Acting Executive Director for Operations Enclosures.
1.
Comparability Review Plan 2.
Denial Systen Description 3.
Inplementation Plan 4.
Contingency Plan cc: Comissioner Roberts Comissioner Asselstine Comissioner Bernthal Comissioner Zech OPE SECY OGC W. ifright, IV. NSC
- 11. Seaton, DOE MCLASSRm) 3 reAA"d V
%[cw uvMt.-
f.
at s I!?ei
'lales ujjes 1igjiss
,,, e nr ei a,
%gl4R..:.
...d#n.?........
...SaiW a
.. E n..'...
......4J.C.......
m
.s
.s o #...........
s...........
s v.Q.n......... u c.u........\\.usaa.........g acCorne....
tren. rya......
ott.......ma aare c ~=
%nt.cr upi.n........ u m a n...........w&u........ u.i
~
- "5**,,
.,.5. *.. ' '
oc ggu p no, o uncu o24o._.......-.
O FFICIA L.R ECO R D CO RY,_ _ _.- - - -- _- - - - _ - --
N $0Ytb55b 00E/NRC COMPARABILITY STUDY Phase I
Purpose:
Selection of'D0E sites / facilities for evaluation Participants in Joint Work Group: 2 DOE HQ staff; 2 NRC Safegua, Js staff Output:
Selection Report Target dates:
Start (t):
February 15, 1986
- o Phase I completion (t ): to + 2 months g
Travel Required:
Local Phase II
Purpose:
Comparability Evaluation of physical security measures at specified DOE facilities and the 4 NRC Cat I fuel facilities.
Participants:
4 NRC Safeguards staff Activities:
(1) Formulation of Quantitative Evaluation Criteria (2) Listing of major physical security measures to be considered:
- barriers
- alaras
- MAA hardness
- guard force system
- contingency program (3) Visit DOE facilities and conduct evaluation (4) Generation of facility effectiveness value Output:
Comparability Report Target Dates:
Comence:
t1 t
Activity t1 + 1 month Activity t
1 month 1 + 3 months Activity ti + 4 months Activity ti+
FinalReport(t):
t1 + 6 months 2
Travel:
DOE facilities Phase III i
Purpose:
Infonn Comission about Comparabil'ity Report Results..
Targetdate(t): t2 + 1 month 3
Phase IV
Purpose:
Implement Comission directed policy
,1
- Asstanes agreement of DOE to supply staff for Joint Work Group.
2 N $0! E"'
ENCLOSURE 1 pg. I j
p 2
.,g 4
.a i
8
~
W c
{4, Nif "In a
=w g5 2
~
g q
I
-W t=
<=:n
~
s aJ yy~g 2
-a n.
rg y
w.i g
g' g:EY
- g 5
t B
C e',
M W
W c :a ce.i t
b I
E C :3 8
A II w
5!
E"h":
l.
.f aIg:l.
a s
i E
e i'
5.-
2 t
w
-l -
E' NUE I
~
w x
-5W ug v
E W
~
c n
.g i
.S
.i
- l g..
- s. ri r
a y
n
.P g
v t
g s
gE E
s.
3 ENCLOSURE 1 Pa. 2
_m.,,..
m--
}
j
~
i
'd
- 1. Ib J
1 ACTIONS NEEDED FOR
~
b IMPLEMENTATION OF VEHICLE BARRIER UPGRADE t
j SPECIFIC STEPS ACTION DOCUMENTS Publish Notice Of Proposed Commission Paper Federal i
j Rulemaking Changing RegisterNotice{FRN)
Design Basis Threat & New Barrier Requirements Publish Proposed Rule Commission Paper. FRN I
I i
-)
Publish Final Rule Commission Paper. FRN Requiring Barrier Upgrade Staff Guidance i
And Plan Submittals Documents i
Staff Complete Plan Licensee Security Plan Reviews Submittals. Acceptance i
Criteria Plan Approval & Licensee License Amendment Implementation Safety Evaluation Report
- =
,1 a
o 1
=y
}
lEASSiFID
l ACTIONS NEEDED FOR IMPLEMENIATION OF SECURITY PLANNING FOR CONTINGENCIES Revise Regulation To Require Contingency Plans for Raotd Implementation o
of Measures Against Vehicles / Bombs - Issue Supporting Regulatory Guide Planning Would Include Engineering Design, Drawings, Purchase Order o
4 Specifications, Procurement Sources, Budget Estimates, Procedures, etc.
Plans Could Be Initiated By Immediately Effective Order If Necessary o
o Estimated'Costi Average $300K/Udit, 530,000K Industry-Wide ENCLOSURE 14