ML20215F825
| ML20215F825 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png |
| Issue date: | 12/12/1986 |
| From: | Lindblad W PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Martin J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8612240077 | |
| Download: ML20215F825 (2) | |
Text
..
lo.
POHTLAND GENEMAL ELECTRIC COMPANY.
((
121 S. W. S A LM O N STR E%T
[g q
- wl LLIAM J. LIN DBLAD PO RTLAN D. On coon 97204
?
M*
cs osi mme-s e7s December 12, 1986 Trojan Nuclear Plant Docket 50-344 License NPF-1 Mr. John B. Martin Regional Administrator, Region V Creekside Oaks office Park 1450 Maria Lane, suite 210 t
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
{
Walnut Creek CA 94596-5368
Dear Mr. Martin:
TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT Quality Control Inspections Our letter of April 1,1986 to the Director, Of fice of Inspection and Enforcement, provided our response to a 10 CFR 2.201 Notice of Violation regarding inadequate quality control (QC) inspections.
In that response, we conunitted to develop and implement a new maintenance procedure con-cerning independent inspections and hold points by April 24, 1986; to develop and implement QC inspection procedures by April 24, 1986; to complete a training and qualification of selected electrical inspectors by April 24, 1986; to develop and implement a training program for all electrical inspectors by December 31, 1986; and to revise existing maintenance procedures and periodic surveillance procedures to include independent inspection hold points and inspections by December 31, 1986.
The above actions have been completed or are proceeding as scheduled.
However, as discussed with members of your staff and to ensure there is no misunderstanding, certain commitments should be clarified. Mainte-nance procedures and periodic surveillance procedures have been reviewed to determine where independent QC inspections should be performed. As a result of this review, it was determined that it is inappropriate to insert QC hold points in periodic surveillance procedures and in all of the maintenance procedures. Where practical, the periodic instrumenta-tion and control test (PICT) procedures will require verification by a second Instrumentation and Control Technician. This is being accomp-lished without the use of specific QC hold points throughout the 8612240077 861212 PDR ADOCK 05000344 O
PDR 75 0)@
e PORTLAND GEN ERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY Mr. John B. Martin December 12, 1986 Page 2 procedure. Additionally, periodic QC observations of personnel performing PICTs are conducted to assess overall job performance.
Certain maintenance procedures are also subjected to the periodic QC observations of work. We feel this meets the intent of our original coinnitment and the requirements of the Trojan Quality Assurance Program, as well as 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B, Criterion I.
We would be pleased to discuss this further with you.
Sincerely, f
- - 'W-c:
Mr. David Kish, Acting Director State of Oregon Department of Energy l
i l
l 1
-