ML20215C234

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Re Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Involving Changes to Procedures Governing NRC Licensing Hearings.Nrc Will Evaluate All Comments Received During Extended Comment Period.Fr Notice Encl.W/O Notice
ML20215C234
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/29/1986
From: Parler W
NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
To: Rich Smith
HOUSE OF REP.
Shared Package
ML20215C237 List:
References
FRN-51FR24365, RULE-PR-2 NUDOCS 8610100180
Download: ML20215C234 (1)


Text

,

~h d

UNITED STATES j

'l O '

'n NUCLEAR REGULATORY CO J@t9N ti 3

WASHINGTON. D. C.

NM

/

SEP 2 9198f. EEME ele 3 I "

f

@rFP2 M B&s OFFICE 0' E -

N" 00C:Eifij" g The Honorable Robert C. Smith United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C.

20515

Dear Congressman Smith:

I have been asked to respond to your letter of September 16, 1986 to Chairman Zech regarding proposed changes to the procedures governing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's licensing hearings.

On July 3, 1986, the Commission published in the Federal Register the enclosed notice inviting public comment on several proposed changes to our rules of practice.

The notice describes the proposed changes in detail and provides the

. Commission's rationale for believing such changes may be warranted.

Although public comments were to be submitted by September 2, because the Commission is particularly interested in receiving the views of the public on its proposal, it extended that date until October 17, 1986.

After carefully evaluating the public comments, the Commission will l

then consider whether to issue a final rule.

In I

acting on the proposals, the Commission will take your views into account..

S ncerely, 1 ))

I flha arler General Counsel

Enclosure:

As stated i

8610100180 860929 PDR PR 2 51FR24365 PDR kM hE'Y

'hA).&

L y

94 lM4 sa lata, H-16 3 8 i

t

.