ML20214X159
| ML20214X159 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 12/04/1986 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20214X148 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-461-86-65, NUDOCS 8612100574 | |
| Download: ML20214X159 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000461/1986065
Text
.
.
3
checklist which resulted in two fuel bundles of medium enrichment
being placed into reactor locations requiring high enrichment fuel
bundles.
c.
On October 5, 1986, while operating in specified condition CORE
ALTERATIONS, a subcriticality check of the just-loaded control cell
(20-29) was not performed, as required, prior to loading two fuel
bundles into control cell 20-14.
d.
On October 7,1986, while operating in specified condition" CORE
R
ALTERNATIONS, two fuel bundles were loaded into control ce n (20-41) R
without prior performance of a subcriticality check as required.
R
e.
On October 8,1986, while loading fuel into the reactor in accordance R
with an approved SNM transfer checklist, two fuel bundles of medium
R
enrichment were designated for placement into core locations
R
requiring high enrichment fuel bundles due to an inadequately
R
prepared SNM transfer checklist.
R
f.
On October 11, 1986, while operating in specified condition CORE
ALTERATIONS, two fuel bundles were loaded into the reactor without
prior enrichment verification by the Shift Test Director as required
by STP-03-0 (memorandum DLH-86-312).
g.
On October 14, 1986, while operating in specified condition CORE
ALTERATIONS, two fuel bundles were loaded into the reactor without
prior enrichment verification by the Shift Test Director as required
by STP-03-0 (memorandum DLH-86-312).
h.
On October 16, 1986, while moving fuel bundles from the Fuel Building
to Containment in accordance with CPS No. 1898.00, a fuel bundle was
moved from one item control area (the Fuel Building) to another (the
Containment Building) without proper verification of the serial number.
These fuel loadin errors are a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement I)
(461/86065-05(DRP ).
3.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V and the IP Operational Quality
Assurance Manual, Chapter 5 states in part: Activities affecting quality
shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings,
of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in
accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings... .
Clinton Power Station Procedure CPS No. 1011.01, Test Programs and
Control, paragraph 2.1 states in part that performance tests, modification
tests, and special tests will be conducted at CPS using approved
procedures.
8612100574 e61204
ADOCK 05000461
G
J
--
,
.
3a
Surveillance Procedure CPS No. 9056.01, Automatic Actuation Of ADS (DIV
I), provides documented instructions for restoration to service after
testing.
' Contrary to the above:
a.
On October 15, 1986, at approximately 6:00 p.m., while investigating
abnormal indications on the Intermediate Range Neutron Monitors,
licensed reactor operators performed a test of the Reactor Protection
System under the verbal direction of the Manager, Clinton Power
Station, without approved documented instructions or procedures.
1
l