ML20214T819
| ML20214T819 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/28/1986 |
| From: | Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Rahe E WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20214T821 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8612090021 | |
| Download: ML20214T819 (3) | |
Text
,
NM M.d
/ %, UNITED STATES E p, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION e U rj WASHINGTON,0. C. 20555
/ November 28, 1986 Mr. E. P. Rahe, Jr, Manager Nuclear Safety Department Westinghouse Electric Corporation Nuclear Technology Division P. O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, PA 15230-0355
Dear Mr. Rahe:
SUBJECT:
ACCEPTANCE FOR REFERENCING OF LICEtlSING TOPICAL REPORT WCAP-10054 ADDENDUM 1. " ADDENDUM TO THE WESTINGHOUSE SMALL BREAK ECCS EVALUATION MODEL (WCAP-10054) USING THE NOTRUMP CODE FOR THE COMBUSTION ENGINEERING NSSS."
TheNuclearRegulatoryCommission(NRC)staffhascompleteditsreviewofthe Tcpical Report WCAP-10054, Addendum 1.
We find the report to be acceptable for referencing in license applications to the extent specified and under the limitations delineated in the report and the associated NRC evaluation, which is enclosed. The evaluation defines the basis for acceptance of the report.
We do not intend to repeat our review of the matters described in the report and found acceptable when the report appears as a reference in license applications, except to assure that the material presented is applicable to the specific plant involved. Our acceptance applies only to the matters described in the report, o,.
In accordance with procedures established in NUREG-0390, it is requested that Westinghouse publish an accepted version of this report within three months of receipt of this letter. The accepted version shall incorporate this letter and the enclosed evaluation after the title page. The accepted version shall include an -A (designating accepted) following the report identification symbol.
) D-3 ')'
W pg2oggg gggg ,
C
E. P. Rahe November 28, 1986 Should our criteria c: regulations change such that our conclusions as to the acceptability nf the report are invalidated Westinghouse and/or the applicants referencing the topical report will be expected to revise and resubmit their respective documentation, or submit justification for the continued effective applicability of the topical report without revision of their respective docurrentation.
Sincerely, Original signed by Dennis M. Crutchfield, Assistant Director Division of PWR Licensing-B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation DISTRIBUTION RSB R/F FMiraglia DCrutchfield CMiller MSchaaf kDiggs, LFMS REmch, PPAS NLauben OFC :5L:R5B' LB :BC:R5B:DFLB : )PLB
....... ..................... . W .................................................
NAME :RJon s:jc g :DC utchfield DkThi5h/bb kih86 5[h 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY
E. P. Rahe November 28, 1986 Sheuld our criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions as to ~
the acceptability of the report are invalidated, Westinghouse and/or the applicants referencing the topical report will be expected to revise and resubmit their respective documentation, or submit . justification for the continued effective applicability of the topical report without revision of their respective documentation.
Sincerely,
- y 1>>
Dennis M. Crutchfie . A istant Director Division of PWR Licensi g-B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation o, .
a I
_ _ _ - . . . . - . ._ _____._- -_ . _ _ _ _ - .. . _ _ - . - - _ _ -