ML20214Q031
| ML20214Q031 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 09/17/1986 |
| From: | Garde B Citizens Association for Sound Energy, TRIAL LAWYERS FOR PUBLIC JUSTICE, P.C. |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| CON-#386-763 OL, NUDOCS 8609240146 | |
| Download: ML20214Q031 (21) | |
Text
-
$TED CORRESP0ftQi.acT 2d dEFORE Tnd UNITED STATES DOCKETED NOCLEAM REGULATURY COMMISSION USNRC nerore tne Atomic Safety ano Licensing Boar W SEP 19 PS :44 In the tsatter or
)
0FFICE OF St.
00CMLTINfi.
L'-('h: v y
T8AAb UTILITIES GsN8 RATING COMPANi,
)
Okt. Nos. su-443-OL M
et al.
)
~
I (Comanche Peak. Steam Siectric
)
Station, Units i ano 2)
)
CPMT DISCOV8RY - o Appenaix F 1.
Iaentify all mochanisms useo to ensure that appropriate personnel within various organizations receive information.
a.
For each mechanism provide the exact title of the mechanism, the torm numoer ir appropriate, and/or any other l
descriptive reference that will enable CASS to uncerstand how inrormation is transmittea trom one organization to another (Rev.
I 3, Appenaix F. p. 3).1 o.
For each mecnanism iaentify the custoaian or the documents.
c.
For eacn mecnanism identify the procedure or procecures used to implement the form.
1 All e, age rererences are to Rev.
J, Appenoix F, unless otherwise noted.
1
)
8609240146 860917 PDR ADOCK ObOOO445 0
(
2.
'loentity all forms or types ot " input data" tnat are or would De reviewed ano commented on by tne inoivioual organizations.
J.
Ioentify all organizations tnat perform the " review and comment" function.
4.
Icentity.all organizations that review the comment ana/or " resolve any conriict prior to completing" their investigation or suoject issue.
5.
Ioentity ano explain all metnods oy which a receiving organization can respond to the input from forwarding organizations.
b.
Accoroing to the "Detaileo pescriptions" section ot Appendix F, tne SRT receives " evaluations of rindings discovereo during tne implementation or the Action Plan Ior sarety signiticance, root cause and generic implications."
In regard to the evaluations oescrioed aoove, are these evaluations the actual inspection checklists and/or other raw data or are the evaluations some otner review of the inspection checklists (i.e.,
results reports)t 7.
Icentity all documents on which the adequacy of corrective action, as determined by the RTL, is documented or recoraea or preserved in any way (p. 4).
d.
Identity all cocuments with which the RTL makes periocic
reports (p. 4).
9.
Icentity all accuments useo to record any instances when a RTL does not agree with the CPSES. Project in an area of corrective actions in accoraance with Appendix d.
10.
At what point in the execution of the CPRT program is it consloered complete for the purposes of toe sRT advising the Executive Vice Presicent (p. 4)?
11.
Ioentary tne person (s) wno are responsible for saaking tne cecision tnat an " item" (as tne term is useo on page 4) may De tne neea tor specific corrective action or the incorporation or " lessons learned" into existing work practices.
12.
Descrine in precise detail the meetings at which the SRT would make decisions to formally transmit information to the TUGCo Vice Presioent ot Operations.
13.
Identify the person (s) who would be the " responsible incivioual," as aescrioed on page 4, who woula or coulo receive information from the Chairman of the SRT.
Provide several speciric examples in wnich tnis procoess has been used.
14.
Does the Chairman of the SRf retain a file of all TUGCo
" internal memos" ne generateo as a result or CPRT activities
( i.e., the neea for corrective action or the incorporation of
" lessons learneo" (p. 4)t ir so, proauce the tile tor inspection ano copying.
I
~.
_4_
13.
Descrine in precise detail how the CPS 8S project completeu word tnat is arrected by tne memo oescrioed in question 14 is incorporateo into tne CPRT evaluations, example:
Tne CFar loentities a proolem with Type A wiaget installation curing a rancom sample inspection.
The CPRT informs tne SRT, ano tne SRT Cnalrman informs the Project superintendent, wno in turn oiscovers tnat tne Type A widget proolem occurs in one out or ten wlagets.
lo.
Ioentity tne person (s) who make the cecision on which issues arising trom SAF8TBAM "could potentially impact accomplishment or tne CPRT Program Picn" (p. 5).
l '/.
loentify tne criteria used of the individuals identitieo in response to wuestion 16 to make the decision on wnicn issues coula "potentially impact accomplishment of the CPRT Program Plan" (p. si.
lo.
Ioentify tne person (s) responsible for transmitting the issues arising trom tne SAF8 TEAM to the SRT Chairman (p. 5).
19.
Descrioe in precise oetail wnat role, it any, the SAFBTEAM nas in deciaing which issues arising from the SAFETdAM coulo potentially impact accomplishment of the CPRT Program Plan (p.
3).
20.
Explain in precise detail, using examples, wnat type or SAFbTEAM issue could potentially impact the accomplishment of the CPKT Program Plan (p. 3).
s
-o-21.
Identity all the reports trom the CYGNA Inaepenuent Assessment Program tnat were assigned to Review Team Leaders for review (p. b;.
22.
Descrioe in prescise cetall wnat items or criteria the.
Review Team Leaoers were looking for during tneir review of tne CiuNA 1AP reports ror issues to oe incluaca in Action Plans.
2J.
Identity the actual Review Team Leaaers or eneir cesignees wno pertornuea the review to ioentify issues to ce includea in tne Action Plans.
24.
Descrioe in precise aetail the process oy whicn the SRT will review the RTL's list of identified issues to make tneir oecision regaraing proper coverage in approved Action Plans.
2d.
what criteria was used o' y the SRT to cetermine whether proper coverage ror tnat issue was provioed oy the Action Plant 26.
What input, if any, was solicited from CYGNA to cetermine wnetner a particular action plan was adequate to resolve tne CYGNA issue't 2 /.
Icentity all persons wno nave ceen or are retaineo as
" experts" witnin a particular tecnnical discipline, oy area of expertise (p. b;.
a.
For eden person listed under a technical alscipline, provice a copy or the person's resume, For eacn person listeu under tne specitic tecnnical o.
_g_
ciscipline, descrioe the oasis of the cecision to retain that person.
For eacn person listed under the specific technical c.
discipline, identify wnat involvement he/she had in the oevelopment of tne ISAPs/DSAPs for each revision.
a.
For each person listed, identify what involvement ne/sne nao in tne review of the results reports.
28.
For the QA/QC-RTL to the DAP-RTL interaction responsioilities, wnich are shown on an interface matrix on pages d et seg. of tne CPRT, Revision 3, explain in precise detail the actual procedures used to implement the commitment to a certain activity.
Example:
On page 8 (the matrix) there is an "x" in the
" Action by DAP" column of the item "Information on root cause analysis taesign relateo concerns ioentified)."
29.
For each item on the matrix, identify the key person or persons who perform the activities which are marked by an "x."
30.
For tne "QA/QC-RTL to other RTL" (Section 2 of Detailed Descriptions, p.
lu), provice tne names of all of the individuals wno perform the tasks described in 2, subsections a-f, on page 10.
l 31.
Explain in precise aetail who will be assisted by whom in preparation of the Quality Instructions for use by inspectors l
l tp. 10, Item 2, a).
l l
l l
_y_
34.
loentity and descrioe what type of reports of inspection activities are conductea of the yA/yC RTL in support of tne ISAes (p. 10, Section 2, b).
3J.
Descrine in precise aetail the process by which the uA/uC RTL reviews the ISAP Results Reports for QA/QC implications or generic implications on naraware or programmatic issues (p.
10).
J4.
How is it cetermined wnetner other RTLs need assistance in conoucting the root cause and generic implications analysis tp. 1U).
Ja.
Descrioe in precise detail wnat is meant oy tne activity described in items 2(e) on page 10 of Appendix F as coordinating with otner RTLs as requireo to determine safety signiricance of construction related deviations ioentifieo during investigations or inspections.
30.
Explain in precise detail what are the activities that would oe pertormed for someone to coordinate the ISAP results reports information during collective evaluations (p. 10, Section 2(f)).
J7.
Explain in precise detail what it means when there is dn "x" in the " Action by Project" block ot'the matrix on page 10.
Jo, explain in precise detail wnat it means when there is an "x" in tne "Into" block of the matrix on page 10.
_g_
Jw.
loentify the management person (s) of the Project who are responsible for each of the items in the matrix on page 10.
a.
Document ano inrormation requests b.
Suppor t services requests c.
Icentified oeviations ano oeficiencies (prepare NCR and review tor 60.35(e) reportability) a.
Corrective actions 40.
Identity all persons or tne project who participate in or implement the project's actions for each or the following items on the matrix on page 10.
a.
Document ano information requests D.
Support services requests Identitied deviations and deficiencies (prepare NCR c.
and review tor 50.ad(e) reportaoility) d.
Corrective actions 41.
Ioentify ano cefine all types of information developed tnrough tne action ot the oiscipline review teams referreo to on page 17 of Appencix F.
Provice specific exalupies.
42.
Explain in precise cetail the methods by which each category ot information ioentitieo above is "made available to tne QA/uc group" (p. 17).
4J.
What, trom Mr. dansel's perspective, are all items that would De of interest from "a WA/QC viewpoint" (p. 17)?
44.
Identify ano descrioe tne exact process and criteria Dy
b
-3 walen "ceticiencies" are determined to be common to more than one oiscipline (p. 11).
Ioentity anu cescrioe the process by which deficiencies so.
are determinea to be of a "QA/wC" nature (p. 17).
40.
Ioentify tne person (s) wno nave tne responsibility to comoine deficiencies of a WA/gC nature as cefined aoove for rurtner evaluation.
47.
For eacn or the 4 items identifiea on tne matrix on page 17, ioentity the person (s) responsiole for the tunctions ioentiried oy "x" in tne columns.
4u.
Ioentity tne person (s) responsible ror ensuring that the Review Team Leaders are furnished with the information that is committea to be turnished per the anatrix to other RTLs (p.
10).
i 4v.
The matrix on page 18 contains the category " Findings identifieo as possioly applicaole to other responsibility area."
explain ano oescrioe in precise detail the criteria and the process oy wnich tnese findings are ioentified, au.
Tne matrix on page lo contains the category "Information consioereo nelprul to otner RTL."
8xplain and aescrioe in precise aetail the criteria ano the process of which tnis "intormation" is identitieo, revieweo, analyzea, categorizeo, considereo, or in any otner way evaluated to determine if it snoulo oe snared wien otner RTLs.
al.
Explain wnat is meant of the footnote on page 19 which states that Corrective Action is only tracked by the Program Director.
52.
wnat action is taken of tne CPS 85 project on the
" action plans" (p. zu)r oJ.
what action, work cooroination, data requests, or corrective action is required of the CPSES project in response to the CPRT cocument information requests (p. 20)?
54.
wnat action, work coordination, data requests, or corrective action is requireo oy the CPSES project in response to support services requests (p. 20)?
S5.
What action, work coordination, data requests, or corrective action is required oy the CPSBS project in response to loentitieo oeviations or oeficiencies (p. 20)?
36.
What action, work coordination, data requests, or corrective action is required of the CPSES project in response to corrective action (p. 20)?
$ 7.
loentify each person witnin tne CPSES project with management responsibility for initiating, directing, ceciding, evaluating, responding to, providing, decioing not to provide, or 1mplementing any action in response to each of tne following items:
a.
action plans t
m D.
document intoranation requests c.
support services requests a.
identiried aeviations or oeficiencies e.
corrective action ad.
Identify each person witnin the CPSE8 project witn implementing responsioility for initiating, airecting, aeciding, evaluating, responaing to, providing, ceciding not to provide, or implementing any action in response to each of tne following items:
a.
action plans o.
document intormation requests c.
support services requests d.
iaentitlea aeViations or aeficiencies e.
corrective action 39.
Iaentify tne APGM-Unit i and APGM-Unic 2.
00.
Icentity all or the CPSES project procedures used for coordinating CPRT activities and CPSES project activities.
If there are no procedures, aescrioe the process in precise detail.
01.
Icentify each individual in tne CPSES project who has any responsioility for implementing CPRT program requirements.
a.
Proviae tne personnel chart or list for the construction group deaicated to CPar program requirements.
o.
Identity tne personts; f rom each of the three tecnnical groups wno are responsible for interf acing directly
with the enird-party RTL.
c.
Identify eacn of tne persons from all contractors who are responsioie tor performing review, evaluations, and analysis tnat is overviewed by a tnira-party element.
o2.
Describe in precise detail how the project personnel wno are responsiole ror ootaining the requiured project information or access to the hardware will do so for each ISAP, DSAP, ana WOC action plan.
Example:
In ISAP I.a.4, project QC inspectors Jon Jones and Bill Smitn accompanlea tne ERC inspectors curing the actual naraware inspection.
03.
Identity eacn CPSdS project person (s) ansigned to each or tne tecnnical groups who perform the review of the CPRT action plans, implementing procedures, and results reports for tne purpose or:
a.
providing a historical perspective.
o.
determining corrective action.
c.
cetermining plan implementation.
ce.
Identify eacn person (s) on the CPS 8S project who evdluates, reviews, oecides wnetner to take action in light or, or otherwise reacts to the findings of the CPRT inspectors, and aescrioe in cetail tneir cuties and the criteria and/or proceoutes that govern their duties witn respect to tindings of tne CPRf.
63.
Produce for inspection and copying all documents t
loentitieo in the answers to these questions and all documents examined and/or relied upon in answering these questions.
. Respectfully submitted, BILLIE P.
GARD 8
"]$-
Trial Lawyers for Public Justice 2000 P Street, NW, #611 Washington, D.C.
20036
.(202) 463-6600 Counsel for CASE Dated:
September 17, l3' 80
Gisa vutetS*0"*""
occKETED usuc 8sFORS Trid
- B6 SEP 19 PS :45 UNITED STATES NUCLEAM HCGULATORY COMMISSION 0FFICf 0r u detore tne Atomic Satety ano Licensing bn, c roard 'i;{
- r a.
In tne Matter or
)
)
TEAAS UTILITIb8 UEN8 RATING COMPANY,
)
Okt. Nos. 50-445-OL et al.
)
50-440-OL
)
(Comanene Pean Stea.n diectric
)
Station, Units 1 ano 2)
)
CPRT DISCOVERY - 7 Appendix H 1.
8xplain in precise detail now tne CPRT program will insure tnat all potential specitic ceviations or ceficiencies existing in the plant will De identirred if programmatic ceviations or deficiencies are only prospective in nature (p. 1).
2.
Explain in precise detail how tne CPSES project will oetine tne corrective action for each ISAP/DSAP and the issues identiried by the self-initiated evaluation (pp.
1-2).
J.
List all of the " categories ot deviations" that must be acceptaDie to tne CPRT for corrective action (p.
2).
4.
Descrioe tne factors cnosiderea in cetermining to what extent tnere will De any tnird party overview or the actual implementation or tne CPS $8 corrective action plan (p. 2).
I a.
Iaenticy tne proceuure tnrough which tne RTL ensures that all oeviations ano deticiencies icentitied curing tneir respective invest 19atory activities are (p.
21:
a, cocumented of tne CPRT.
o.
evaluoteu and classitlea of tne CPaT.
c.
trenaea of tne CPRT.
c.
transmittea to tne CPSES project ror nonconformance processing.
o.
Icentity tne person (s) responsiole ror performing 10 CFR
- 30. sate) reportaoility evaluations for aeviations or aericiencies (p. 21 (II there is a citterent indiviaualts) for each tecnnical discipline, incluae tnat information in your answer.)
7.
Identity tne procecures or describe in precise aetail tne process tnrougn wnicn tne CPRT RTL ootains concurrence in tne CPSES project cetinea corrective actions.
d.
Tnere are tour categories of deficiencies ana/or oeviations on page z ot Appenalx n ror wnicn the CPSES project is responsiole tor ootaining CPRf-RTL concurrence.
Do these categories cover tne entirety or tailures to meet original commitments, regardless of whetner or not it is a safety-s19niticant aericiency or programmatic deviation deticiency?
a.
It the answer is no, explain wnat otner categories ot 'inrormation or tinoings ootainea oy tne CPRT co not nave to nave corrective action approved of tne CPRT.
o.
1r tne answer is yes, laentify into wnich category
- ( o the construction "Doo-ooo" (see CPRT Discovery-4, v. 2) is processea.
9.
Descrioe in precise detall tne process by wnica an MTL obtains SRT approval prior to recommending proposed corrective action.
10 In regaru to tne conrirmatory overviews or tne CPRT or tne implementation of tne corrective actions, provide the metnocology ti.e.,
procecures or cescription of the process):
tor eacn or tne activities listed on pp. 6o of a.
Appena1x H.
o.
for each CPRT-identitled aesign deticiency.
tnat the oesign cocumentation properly reflects the c.
implementation or tne corrective action.
c.
tnat the site documentation properly reflects the as-cullt and reviseo oesign documentation.
e.
tnat tne aesign oocumentation properly reflects the implementation or corrective action.
to that tne cocumentation that cemonstrates the as-built concition ot the plant is in contormance with the revised design documentation.
that tne corrective actions are adequate for any 9
design deviations reportable unaer 50.56te).
h.
tnat tne CPS 8S project policies, programs, and implementing proceaures or instructions relating to oesign activities nave Deen cnanged to retlect the programshatic revisions.
l
r
, i 6
11.
Tne CPRT program plan states that it will gain "acultional contidence" tnat the project's implementation of corrective actions tnrough three aooitional activities ioentified on pages o-7 or Appenoix H.
Provice tne methodology or descrioe tne process in precise aetail on how tne overview will oe accompilsnea for tne corrective actions ot:
eacn CPRT-identitiec construction oeticiency a.
(loentity tnose overviews tnat will oe accomplished by an inoependent CPRT reinspection, those tnat will ne accomplished tnrough tne witnessing of CPRT personnel of the reinspection);
D.-
each construction deviation that meets 60.55(e) reportaoi;1ty; c.
tne aocument review or revised policies, programs, ano implementing procedures.
12.
Tne CPRT program plan states tnat it will gain adoitional contioence regarding implementation of corrective action tor preoperational ano startup testing through activities listec and described in pages /-s of Appencix d.
For each of the activities listea, provide the methodology through which the CPRT will perform its confirmatory activities tor:
a.
the CPRT review of testing programs documentation for eacn speciric CPRT-identitieo dericiency; o.
tne CPRT review of testing program aeviations 1
reportable unoer 10 CFR 50.55 (e);
c.
tne CPRT review of tne revisea procedures, 1
1
-d-policies, and programs tot eacn CPRT-laentitiec programmatic aeviation or dericiency.
14.
Identity tne procedures or process used to determine if tne CPRT agrees or aisagrees witn any decision to remove corrective actions trom tne specific overview activities outlined in appenoix d.
14.
8xplain in aetail now the CPRT receives, evaluates, and integrates into ongoing and completed work the results of inspections conoucted by tne CPSES project personnel on rework and ongoing work at Units 1 and 2.
15.
Proouce cor inspection and copying all documents identified in the answers to these questions and all documents examined or relleo upon in preparation or the answers to these questions.
Respectfu11f suomitted, 4A e': %
111LLIE P. GARDE Yf Trial Lawyers for Puolic Justice 2000 P Street, Nw, #611 Washington, D.C.
20036 (202) 40J-8600 Counsel for CASE Datea:
septemoer 17, 19eo i
l l
t l
aMLLATED COMMP.5PONDutCi t
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 00LKETED USNRC NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAF8TY AND LIC8NSING BOARDlE HP 19 P5 :45 In tne Matter ot
)
gfyhg g'
)
BRANCH TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING
)
COMPANY, et al.
)
Docket Nos. 50-445-0L
)
and 50-446-OL (Comancne Peak Steam Electric
)
Station, Units 1 and 2)
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE By my signature Delow, I hereby cer tiry that true and correct copies of CASE's CPRT DISCOVERY - 6 ano 7 have Deen sent to tne persons listed below tnis 17tn cay of September 1986 oy:
Express mail where indicated of "; dana-delivery where indicated by **; and First Class dail unless otherwise indicated.
Administrative Judge Peter B.
Bloch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission wasnington, D.C.
20555 Dr. Kennetn A. McCollom 1107 West Knapp stillwater, Oklahoma 74073 Dr. Walter H. Jordan del W.
Outer Drive Oak Rioge, Tennessee J7830 Elizaoetn 8. Jonnson Oak Rioge National Laooratory P.O.
dox x, Builcing 350u Oak Ridge, TN 3/d30 l
1 l
811en Ginsoerg, 8sq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission wasnington, D.C.
20355 Rooer t A.
Wooldriage, Esquire worsnam, Forsythe, Sampels
& Woolarlage 2001 Bryan Tower, Suite J200 Dallas, Texas 75201 Nicnolas Reynolds, Esquire 81Snop, Lioerman, Cook, Purcell & Reynolas 1200 17tn Street, N.w.
washington, D.C.
200J6 Geary S. Mizuno, 8 squire Ortice or Executive Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission washington, D.C.
20555
" Docketing & Service Section Office of tne Secretary d.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission wasnington, D.C.
20d55 Renea Hicks, 8 squire Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Division Supreme Court duilaing Austin, Texas 76711 Mrs. Juanita Ellis President, CASE 1420 S. Polk Dallas, Texas 73244 Mr.
w.G.
Counsil 8xecutive Vice Presicent Texas utilities Generating Co.
Skyway Tower, 45tn Floor
-400 N.
Olive Street Dallas, Texas 75201 Mr. Roy P.
Lessy, Jr.
Morgan, Lewis e dockius 1800 M Street, N.W.
wasnington, D.C.
200J6
Mr. Tuomas u. Dignan, Jr.
Ropes a Gray 225 Franklin Street Boston, Massacnusetts 02110
(
"__ANTHON Z
'R SMAN i
i i