ML20214J428
| ML20214J428 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/21/1987 |
| From: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| To: | Harold Denton, Stello V NRC OFFICE OF GOVERNMENTAL & PUBLIC AFFAIRS (GPA), NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| References | |
| REF-10CFR9.7 M870513D, NUDOCS 8705280045 | |
| Download: ML20214J428 (1) | |
Text
IN RESPONSE, PLEASE.
REFER TO; M870513D
/
UNITED STATES NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION y'
{ g.
.j W ASHIN GTON. D.C. 20535
'%,,,,, #g May 21, 1987 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY MEMORANDUM FOR:
Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Governmental and Public Affairs Victor Stello, Jr.
Executive Director for Operations p
uel J. Chilk, Secretary FROM:
SUBJECT:
STAFF REQUIREMENTS - AFFIRMATION / DISCUSSION AND VOTE, 3:30 P.M., WEDNESDAY, MAY 13, 1987,.
COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, D.C. OFFICE (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE)
I.
SECY-87-104 - Proposed Agreement Between the State of Illinois and U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Pursuant-to Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, As Amended With respect to entering into an agreement with the. State of Illinois (pursuant to Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended), the Commission,* by a vote of 3-1,** with Chairman Zech and Commissioners Bernthal and Carr agreeing, approved an order, as modified by Commissioner Carr, providing tor NRC retention of jurisdiction over Allied-Chemical Corporation, Metropolis, Illinois.
(Subsequently, on May 14, 1987, the Secretary signed the Order.)
4 cc:
Chairman Zech Commissioner Asselstine Commissioner Bernthal Commissioner Carr Commission Staff Offices
_pDR - Advance WCS - 016 'Phillips Commissioner Roberts did not participate.
- Section 201 of the Energy Reorganization Act, 42 U.S.C.
S5841, provides that action of the Commission shall be deter-mined by a " majority vote of the members present."
Commissioner Asselstine was not present when this item was affirmed.
j Accordingly, the formal vote of the Commission was 3-0 in favor i
of the decision.
Commissioner Asselstine, however, had pre-dously indicated that he would~ disapprove this order and had j
he been present he would have affirmed his prior vote, u