ML20214G803
| ML20214G803 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 12/11/1972 |
| From: | Graf J US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| CON-WNP-0085, CON-WNP-85 NUDOCS 8605220526 | |
| Download: ML20214G803 (1) | |
Text
_=
l sf i
A Yf i
DEC 1 "
{
sj j note to ria=
TEmim WWE 3. BEsrEPEma, m Am 3M cm. Agg Lgggg pga DIRECT (EEM BdBS&TBW AT Em 2 3RR Bem ler. Beastieher is preparing a report shiek will inslede does estimates and poesihty :=======a=*1ans Ser modifiaattaa of the Emmford Wait 2 resoner site h== dery. Beyonding en the==1==1=*1emel model need he coagutes deems at the site h===a==y (193GE) of 2.5 or 6 seren/yr due to direct.:hhine. He requested a smidamee===her myeu skick to base his r======dariana.
He referessed a paper gives at the recent American Ihaclear Society Mrating (BRA-M7202) skioh states, "Though the proposed dppendia I speaks explicitly caly about radiatian ausrces due to plant effluents and in percicular abset the airborne effluent, it was at once suggested that for the saka of eemplete protectime of the someral popu-lace, all statisesry plant radiation " shine" asuroes unst be included l
in the 10 mees /yr limitaties as well. W e disenssions with the.
i ABC en this subject soon emphasised the reed for the thclusion of the "ahi-m" doses in the amenal esposures."
i Mr. Dresticher is oossidering recosussadations of a) no change, b) adding more shielding, c) decreasing the distance to the site boundary depending l
on ths guidance he receives. The questions to be sesolved ame: a$ 1Anat is the limit for direct radiation alone, and b) temat is the limit for combined dose at the site beumiary?
l Without osament en the specific numbers cala=1=*=d er the specific reactor project, Mr. Bresticker was told that there is metageeral guidance anseher j
avai&able at this time to apply to direct radiation tot that each case is dealt with individually between the applicant and ragshhtery. General considerations are the ungditude of dose rate and the oest of alternatives i
to reduce the dose rate, m ME l
Radiologiaal A= =====* Breach, L i
ec E. m t.a J. Eastant
- 3. Minor R. Leoas i
l l
T. Essig l
J. Graf l
W. Ereger L:EA...hld[.....laRA..
l M'
/
omer >
su m ut >
..Jpra f :,pt _,, _ JKast r l
our>
.12/ 5'./ 22..
.12/11.122 j
For= AEC-515 (Rev 9-33) AICM 0240 c u s oo.ta%ev pavam met 1972-466 984 l
8605220S26 721211 l
-