ML20214G791
| ML20214G791 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 08/24/1972 |
| From: | Clark R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| CON-WNP-0105, CON-WNP-105 NUDOCS 8605220511 | |
| Download: ML20214G791 (2) | |
Text
F
- e AUG 2 41972 Docket No. 50-397 Note to Files On August 22, 1972, in a meeting with J. Hendrie, G. Lainas, R. Johnson, W. Haass, J. Owsley, and R. Clark, the WPPSS proposal to install a Containment Atmosphere Dilution System (CAD) as the primary means of controlling combustible gases in the Hanford 2 containment atmosphere was discussed.
It was concluded that the proposal was not acceptable for a plant in the Hanford stage of design (C.P. application).
I agreed to call the applicant and to inform him that his proposed system is not acceptable as the primary means for controlling combustible gases.
In addition, it was agreed that the applicant should be requested to amend the informatior.
submitted in Amendment No. 9 withdrawing the CAD system proposal and commiting to providing his design for a combustible gas control system for our review as a post wnstruction permit item.
Original signed by Robert A. Clark Robert A. Clark, Chief Gas Cooled Reactors Branch Directorate of Licensing cc J. Hendrie A. Giambusso R. Boyd i
l W. Haass S. Minor BWR Branch Chiefs OFFICE >
-~
$URNAME>
DATE >
.-2.,-
Form 4tC-11e tRev 9-50 AFCM 0240
- ** s - in -s i.4H.we 8605220511 720824 PDR ADOCK 05000397 A
PDR i-
,r '
5 hi0
/
- 4**,
UNITED STATES
[ N) / 5 ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
. <d WASHINGTON. D.C.
20545
%)y *g u,,,,.i Docket No. 50-397 AUG 2 41972 Note to Files On August 22, 1972, in a meeting with J. Hendrie, G. Lainas, R. Johnson, W. Haass, J. Owsley, and R. Clark, the WPPSS proposal to install a Containment Atmosphere Dilution System (CAD) as the primary means of controlling combustible gases in the Hanford 2 containment atmosphere was discussed.
It was concluded that the proposal was not acceptable for a plant in the Hanford stage of design (C.P. application).
I agreed to call the applicant and to inform him that his proposed system is not acceptable as the primary means for controlling combustible gases.
In addition, it was agreed that the applicant should be requested to amend the information submitted in Amendment No. 9 withdrawing the CAD system proposal and commiting to providing his design for a combustible gas control system for our review as a post construction permit item.
d (t
cu i.
s Robert A. Clark, Chief Gas Cooled Reactors Branch Directorate of Licensing cc:
J. Hendrie A. Giambusso R. Boyd W. Haass S. Miner BWR Branch Chiefs L.