ML20214F547
| ML20214F547 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 06/18/1986 |
| From: | Dewald I COMSTOCK ENGINEERING, INC. |
| To: | Saklak R COMSTOCK ENGINEERING, INC. |
| References | |
| 84-11-20-06, 84-11-20-6, OL-I-ROREM-044, OL-I-ROREM-44, NUDOCS 8705260143 | |
| Download: ML20214F547 (1) | |
Text
[0 - */ 5 6 tE/ F 7 -(),L a n -.
Q~~
f th r 2r~- '/'l W
&/' H'omstock Engineering,.Inc.
P6
..s-C Memorandum'87 APR 22 P6 :54 Braidwood To:
R. Saklak File ogg;c, uFr.
From:
I. DeWald
- . 4.
11/20/84 3a ;g.
R. Saklak/T. Rolan Incident g y,.
Control 1:o. 84-11-2:-06 After interviewing and receiving the circumstances of the incident and taking into consideration previous incidents and discussions with R. Saklak concerning his supervision practices, the conclusion is:
A) Concerning the incident, Mr. Saklak used very poor judgment and did not follow up the problem with F. Rolan's lead as should have been done.
i B) The discussion between the two individuals should have been stopped by Mr. Saklak when he recognized the discussion was getting out of hand.
C)
Mr. Saklak should not have made the threatening type statements concerning Mr. Rolan's certifications and the NRC.
This was extremely poor action on Mr. Saklak's part.
3)
Mr. Rolan was somewhat at fault also in that he did not inform Mr. Saklak that he had been directed to do the work in that way by his lead.
E) Although Mr. Rolan did not inform Mr. Saklak of his previous instructions, it does not relieve Mr. Saklak of his supervisory responsibilities.
F)
In consideration of the previous items, I elected to issue Mr. Saklak a written warning for poor conduct as a supervisor as the incident could have been handled in a professional manner without boisterous conversation, and threatening statements of which Mr. Saklak has been previously spoken to about.
f.
8705260143 860618 I. F. r4Wald PDR ADOCK 05000456 O
PDR Quality Control Manager
. ; t :.. '.. Tile r rua
.C9 000143g3 3M g NM Mo.e.tw
- - -