ML20214F483
| ML20214F483 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 06/11/1986 |
| From: | Shamblin D COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Marino R COMSTOCK ENGINEERING, INC. |
| References | |
| OL-I-ROREM-039, OL-I-ROREM-39, NUDOCS 8705260114 | |
| Download: ML20214F483 (2) | |
Text
,
} f)
Lj f f /4/$ ] - Q X
-@W
[
r Mons 6/)/jf 1n..
Commonwealth Edison Co.
s',
i Braidwood Station RR 1, Box 81 k
gE Bracevine. IL 60407
- p M 22 P6 :53 815/458 2801 g Te ephone k R r
June 6, 1985' 09
- k.
1:
M 4 5. _,
.BR/PCD 85-496 an_
g, 5i Ej e b
a
- - Ed g
8 3
sg j jy j g L. K. Comstock Engineering, Inc.
j i
920 For: Duquesne Blvd.
g g
Pittsbulgh, Pennsylvania 15222 t
1]-
l
\\-
{
=
Attention: Mr. R. Marino K l
{
General Manager Q.A./Q.C. Services iki!
g$3 u
Braidwood Station - Units 1 & 2 Ji 3 =S!c5= 5
Subject:
Electrical Erection Vork 52 543353 I
Sargent & Lundy Specification L-2790A letter, Richard Saklak (former L. K. Comstock Quality May 17, 1985
Reference:
Control Supervisor) to Dan Shamblin (Commonwealth Edison Company Project Construction Superintendent)
Dear Mr. Marino,
I am forwarding to you a letter from Mr. Richard Saklak which I received 22, 1985. This letter requests that some light be by certified mail on May shed on Mr. Saklak's discharge from the L. K. Comstock Quality control The basis of Mr. Saklak's request is apparently due to the lack Department.
of deteils he received from L. K. Comstock management upon his discharge.
A detailed explanation for the basis of Mr. Saklak's discharge is best It was my understanding this was handled by L. K. Comstock Engineering, Inc.
During our phone done during your meeting with Mr. Saklak of April 3, 1985.
conversation on April 2, 1985, I informed you of Connonwealth Edison Company's position relative to future employment of Mr. Richard Saklak at the Braidwood Nuclear Power Station and any other Connonwealth Edison Company Nuclear Specifically, I told you that it was Commonwealth Edison Company's position that Mr. Richard Saklak be removed from a L. K Sites.
f will not be employed in any other Q.A./Q.C. role or safety related role for any other Contractor at the Braidwood Nuclear Power Station or any other Mr. Saklak is not barred from any commonwealth Edison Company Nuclear Site. Ve recommended to the L. K. Comstock of our Nuclear Sites in any other roles.
and Company, Inc. that Mr. Richard Saklak not be employed at any other L. K.
Comstock Nuclear Site in any Q. A./Q.C. role.
HP93fbOh EXitlBITj@' g ///g
((}C00093n 8705260114 860611 4
ADOCK 0500 6
gDR dEWei=msjipm;ern?f
I I
1
\\
.=..
r>.
f BR/PCD 85-496 Page 2 of 2 i
l We intend to respond to Mr. Saklak stating we have forwarded his May 17, 1985 letter onto you for your action. We will enclose a copy of this letter in our response to Mr. Saklak. We trust you will resolve this matter.
Very truly yours,
\\ r....0 (,N
!b" D. L. Shamblin Proj. Construction Superintendent Braidwood Station DLS/kje/1926a I
C0009372
. - _ _