ML20214F136

Applicant Exhibit A-69,consisting of 840806 Memo Discussing Status of Findings in Encl Internal Audit I-062-084. Responses to Findings I-062-084-1 & I-062-084-2 Requested by 840813

ML20214F136
Person / Time
Site:	Braidwood
Issue date:	07/01/1986
From:	Seltmann R, Simms R COMSTOCK ENGINEERING, INC.
To:	Dewald I, Rolan F COMSTOCK ENGINEERING, INC.
References
84-08-06-09, 84-8-6-9, OL-A-069, OL-A-69, NUDOCS 8705220425
Download: ML20214F136 (15)

Text

, r 46 -+56,ly'57 -0 L p%. ,' ~

. . . y,'-

~'

/9 7 69

~~

Comstock EngineeriiEdfinc. 7j/yg Memorandum 87 ffR 14 P8 G8 I. F. DeWald/F. Rolan Braidwood ,

To: ;g, Offk.e:

From: R. Simms/R. Seltmann

Subject:

Internal Audit I-062-084 g,,,,

08/06/84 Control No: 84-08-06-09 On 7/2/84, Internal Audit Report I-062-084 was forwarded to your attention (Ref.: ' Memo 84-06-30-02) requesting responses to Audit finding Numbers I-062-084-1 and I-062-084-2.

The following is the status of these findings:

I-062-084 To date we are not in receipt of your response to this finding.

I-062-084 No formal response has been received by QA. QA has

' received a copy of a letter from L. G. Seese to I. F. DeWald (Ref.

- Memo 84-07-11-01 dated 7/11/84) but no formal response has been

received stating what is to be accomplished to correct this deficiency.

Please forward your responses to Audit Findings I-062-084-1 and 1-062-084-2 by 8/13/84. Response to the findings should be submitted on the Form 69'.s.

Attached is another copy of the report.

~

R. Simms Auditor-In-Training

.s R. Seltmann Lead Auditor RS/jmb

...m ~' $}+h, y Attachments ,,n C '-C 'i y)'4 l c.-[,7.,i-((ykD cc: T. Paserba ,d i ly N R. Porter '

'g

• J. Klena -

L. Seese J. Walters QC file ' -

(06 tM +_ m u _ _ _u,g,3

~

l 8705220425 860701 fkkkg g

Mald Date Response Oue: 7/27/84 Recuiremente

References:

Brai& cod Procedure 4.9.3, Rev. A FINDING (Noted on Reporti I-062-084-2 CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN:

N 9'

AUTHOR: DATE ACTION TAKEN TO PREVENT REPETITION:

FORCEFERENCEDU Qate by wnicn Corrective Action will be effective or complete:

l Date Response Rsceived: Reviewed By:

I Status of Response: Satisfactory 0 unsatistactory l Comments:

i Venfication of C.:rrscrive Act:on to AFR: Satisfactory C Unsatisfactory C l Verified Sv: Date of Verification:

C,:imments:

l Oate AFR Closed: Closed By:

i

(

~

AFPROV ED REVl$EO TITLE ORIG. 0 ATE REV.OATE FORM N8R.

.. ' PARED

• A CKS IFO PROCEDURE 7/01/82 69 07/22/83

- _ . -_ _ _ . . _- .-, _ . . - _ .._--_..,_,y . ..-__m - _._m

L. K. COMSTOCK & COMPANY. INC..

AUDIT CHECKLIST Audet No. '- m' A4' Page 1 ' of 11

" T 'i **

10CFR50 Aooenoni B Criteria

/ ~ 'toference Docurnent 3 r iidwod

• roc d u re a .9.3 Re*/ . A

.uditor R. S t=s / J . Sumrow cate 6/26/84 REVIEW PARAGRAM .

NO. REQUIREMENT No.

- COMPLETE BRAIDWOOD PROCEDURE 4.9.3, Rev. A (3/22/84)

" HANGER FABRICATION PROCEDURE"

,,p; //j,g4 1. PROCEDURE CRITERION T' W er Materials used shall be as noted on the applicable S & L 3.1 Drawings and Specifications.- -

> Materials shall be received and accepted in accordance with 3.1.1

.', LKC Procedure 4.10.2 prior to use.

AUDIT DESCRIPTION ,

Performed field audit of fab shop to verify compliance to the

• above criterion. ,

SUMMARY

Field audit of in-process inspection of recently fabricated

' hangers revealed compliance with the above criterion.

' ' Hangers observed in the process of being inspectedt HANGER NO. FAB SHOP NO. DRAWING NO./REV.

j CC-10 FS707 20E-1-3351A Rev. AC

, CC-10 FS708 20E-1-355 LA Rev. AC e

m yffY'we w 1

i i

omio.oATE mav.oATE Pomu pesa.

I PasPAmso Aremoveo mevisto TITLE CKS IFD WAG PROCEDURE 7/1/82 69A 07/01/82 I

\ .

4. CCMSTOCK & COMPANY. INC. -

AUDIT CHECKLIST Aucit No. N 2 -H . page 2 of 11 10CFM0 Apoencim 8 Ct:'a .a R:ference Document Br ' F 22 ?racedure . 3.*. Je.. A Avaitor 2  ::- s

• Tumrov Date 6/26/94 m

MEVIEW PARAGRAPH NO. REQUIREMENT ,

COMPL ETE NO.

gf fj3 g 2. PROCEDURE CRITERION

?h/t/ Only qualified welders certified to the requirements of LKC 3.2 Procedures 4.7.1. 4.3.3. and a.3.3.1 shall perform necessary welding.

AUDIT DESCRIPTION Ritviewed current welders file to verify welders were certified'to perform required welding for hangers listed in

' Audit Point No. 4.

SUMMARY

The following are the results to the review:

WELDER'S SYMBOL WELDER DESCRIPTION 67 A. Scotts Certified to applicable pro- (SAT) ,

cedures 4.7.1 and 4.3.3.

97 R. Rawlins Certified to applicable pro- (SAT) cedures 4.7.1 and 4.3.3.

556 G. McMannis Certified to applicable pro- (SAT) cedures 4.7.1 and 4.3.3.

57 V. York Certified to Procedure ECE 9.2. (UNSAT)

(SEE AUDIT FINDING NO. I-062-084-1)

. ==

9

-- 6.EPARED APPMOV ED REVISED TITLE ORIG.DATE, AEV.DATE FORM Nem.

CKS IFO WAG PROCEDURE 7/1/82 69A 07/01/82

L. K. COMSTOCK & COMPANY, INC.

AUDIT CHECKLIST Audit No. I-062-04 p g, 3 og 11 10CFR50 Apoendix 8 Criteria " "' X

' Reference Oocument Braid'. cod ?recedure a.9.3, Rev. A Date 6/26/94 Auditor D. C ' -- 4 / _' .. i= 2 m

f MEVIEW PARAGRAPH No. REQUIREMENT NO.

COMPLETE

@ 7/4/9 3. PROCEDURE CRITERION

1. T All material shall be cut and asse= bled to the dimensions de- 3.3 called on approved S & L schedule drawings.

In cases where assembly ca,nnot be completed per drawings, the 3.3.1 fabrication foreman shall notify an LKC Engineer for an eval-uation and resolution.

AUDIT DESCRIPTION Performed field audit of fab shop to verify compliance to the above criterion. ,

SUMMARY

Field audit of in-process inspection of recently completed hangers revealed compliance to the above criterion.

Hangers observed in the process of being inspected are listed in Audit Point No.1.

(SATISFACTORY)

W APPROV ED REvlsEO TITL.E OR[G.DATE R EV. DATE PCRM NSR.

PREPARED IFO WAG PROCEDURE 7/1/82 69A CKS 07/01/82

. . L. K. COMSTOCK & COMPANY. INC.

AUDIT CHECK 1.lST Audat No.

,*:-,31 p,p t og 10CFR50 Acoendi= B Criter a , :'. '-

tference Document 3rsilvooc ?rocedure ..f.3. Rev. A Auditor ,

'4 . St r.s<J. Sumrow Cate 6/24/04 PARAGRAM

- LEVIEW NO. REQUIREMENT NO.

COMPT.ETE e, r . . 7. r 4 4. PROCEDURE CRITERION YY!dY Upon completing fabrication of an assembly or assemblies, the 3.4.1 fabrication foreman will completa a Hanger /Cemponent Fabricatior j Record (Form 220) which shall include the following information: ,

NOTE: The Form 220 may be replaced by the Installation

f Wald Record as listed in Procedure 4.3.3.

Date complaced., 3.4.1 Welded per welding procedure. 3.4.1.1 Welders symbol number. 3.4.1.2 Filler metal used. 3.4.1.3 Hanger / component number. 3.4.1.4 Drawing number. 3.4.1.5

. Draping revision. 3.4.1.6 The fabrication foreman shall then sign and date the fors 3.4.2 signifying the components are fabricated in accordance with all applicable drawings, specifications, etc. and meet the acceptance criteria as noted in 3.5.1 of this procedure.

The foreman will then forward the form to I.KC QC for review 3.4.2.1 and required inspection. -

AUDIT DESCRIPTION Reviewed Form 220's of recently coupleted hangers awaiting in-spection in fab shop and Form 220's filed in QC Vault to verify compliance to 'the above criterion.

SilMMARY_

'taview of Fars 220's in feo shop and in QC 74 ult revealed the following:

APPROVED REVISED TITLE CMIG.DATE REV.QATE PORM NOR.

,t.EPARED CXS IFO WAG PROCEDURE 7/1/82 69A 07/01/82

L. K. COMSTOCK & COMPANY, INC.

AUDIT CHECKt.lST ,

Audit No. I-062-084 pig, 5 of 1r 10CF A50 Appendix B Criteria . ' , IX. X

'tference Document Braidwood Procedure a . 9. 3. Re v . A

.aditor 3. Simms/J. Sumrow Date 6/26/94 C;EVIE JJ ARAGRAM ,

NO. REQUIREMENT

. COMPL ETE NO.

1) Form 220's (Fab Shop)

Hanger No. Fab Shop No. Date CC-110 FS707 06/25/84 -

FS708 FS709 FS710 1VT-I.M006 FS706 06/25/84 IVT-1.M011 FS711 06/25/84 LVT-1.M012 FS712 06/25/84 All the above hangers used Filler Metal E7018.

(SATISFACTORY)

2) Form 220's (In QC Vault)

Ha'nger No. Fab Shop No. Form 220 Date W-25 FS98 04/27/84 CC-184 FS630 06/05/84 CC-512 FS623 06/07/84 CC-512A/S FS624 06/07/84 CC-511 FS625 06/07/84 CC-511A/S FS626 06/07/84 CC-182 FS627 06/07/84 CC-10 FS628 06/07/84 FC-20 FS629 06/07/84 W-500 FS390 05/18/84 IJB972R FS217 05/01/84 IJB972R FS218 05/01/84 ,

FC-29 FS46 04/18/84 CC-2 FS290 05/04/84 A CC-2A/S FS291 05/04/94 ,{

CC-3 FS292 05/0t./84 , p CC-3A/S TS293 05/04/84 CC-4 FS294 05/04/84 CC-4A/S FS295 05/04/84 CC-5 FS296 05/04/84 CC-5A/S FS297 05/04/84 -

CC-6 FS298 05/04/84 CC-6A/S FS299 05/04/84 PREPARED APPROVED REVISEO TITLE O'llG. D AT E REV.DATE FORM NOR.

CKS IFD WAG PROCEDURE 7/1/82 69A 07/01/82

- L. K. COMSTCCK & CCMPMdY. INC.

• - AUDIT CHECKLIST Auet No. I -'M 2 -0 % *#1 '

10CFRSO Aeoencin B Criteria J. [X. X Ceference Document 3raic Nd Procecure . 9. 3. g .r . .;

uditor R. 31.ms/J. Sumrow ,

Date 6/26/94 MEVIEW PARAGRAPH NO' REQUIREMENT COMPLETE NO. .

i All che above hangers used Filler Metal E7018.

(SATISTACTORY) p O

i I

9 e

1 9

6 4

sa, 1 . .esPAmso Aremoveo navisso rm.s onio. oats nav. oats Pomu son.

! CKS IFD WAG PROCEDURE 7/1/82 69A 07/01/82 4

. . L. K. CCMSTOCK & COMPANY, INC.

AUDIT CHECKLIST a voit *do. * -'*W '

Page 7 of 11 10CFR50 Aooencia 3 C tena . G. X Reference Document Seatdvo<d Precedure a.9.3. nev. A Auditor R. $ 1 ::'Is / J. Sumrow Date 6 /M /14 NEVIEW

• PARAGRAPH -

COMPLETE NO.

o . . 5. PROCEDL'RI CRITERION

)[ Nh Upon receipt of the Hanger Fabrication Record. a qualified weld inspector shall perform visual inspection on all complaced 3.5 assemblies to issure: .

Correct materials were used (base metal, unistrue, etc.). 3. 5 .1 Assemblies were welded in accordance with applicable specifi- 3. 5 .1.1 cations / drawings.

Welds are inspected per the requirements of 1.KC Procedure 4.8.3. 3. 5 .1. 2 Hanger / component dimensions correct per drawings, details, 3. 5 .1. 3 sketches, etc. ,

The results of.the inspection will be documented on a Form 19. 3. 5 .1. 4 In cases where the componenet is assigned a Tab Shop ID Number, that number will be used for documentation until the time of field installation when the permanent hanger ID is assignad.

Conditions found to be non-conforming vill be doctsaented on an 3.5.1.5 ICR or NCR as outlined in Procedures 4.11.1 and 4.11.2.

. The QC Inspector will stamp the accepted hanger with his symbol. 3.5.1.6 The fab shop symbol and the QC Inspectors symbol v111 be stamped adjecent to the stamped hanger number.

AUDIT DESCRIPTION Reviewed Fora 19's and NCR in QC Vault and performed field audit of fab shop to verify compliance with the above criterion.

St:MMARY The following are the results of the review:

1. Review of Form 19's in QC Vault revealed that the results of inspections were 5eing documented and that the Form 19's were being filled out correctly. Ra- T viewed Form 19's for hangers listed in Audit Point 4 i (SATISFACTORY) canfd(d*

PREPARED APPROVED REVISED TirLE ORIG. D ATE REV.QArt PCRM NOR.

) .

CKS IFO WAG PROCEDURE 7/1/82 07/01/82 08A

L. K. COV5TOCK & COMPANY. INC.

, AUDIT CHECKLIST Audit No.

10CFR50 Appendix B Criteria I

'M 2-0M Page - Of h -

9;ference cocument 3 raiesued ?re.:edure ' . 3. 9 . hv. A (uditor R. Simms/J. Sumrow Date 6/06/84 MEVIEW PARAGRAPH NO. REQUIREMEf1T ,

COMPT.ETE NO.

2. Observed Hanger Number CC-135 in fab shop with hold tag attached indicating non-conforming condition.

Hold tag referenced NCR d2318. Review of NCR in QC Vault revealed that the non-conforming condition of Hanger Number CC-135 had been correctly documented.

e (SATISFACTORY)

3. Hangers obsarved in fab shop had fab stiop symbol, QC Inspectors symbol and hanger number stamped on hangars as required. Hangers observed in fab shop are listed in Audit Point 1.

(SATISFACTORY) e e

9

'#REPARED APPROV ED R E VI5 ".D TITLE ORIG.DATE REV.DATE. FCRM NOR.

CKS IFD WAG PROCEDURE 7/1/82 69A l 07/01/82

= _ . - . - .

• L. K. CCV. STOCK & COMPANY, INC.

. ' AUDIT CHECKLIST Auct No. l - m -'-o 4 Page 9 of al 10CFR50 Aooemin 3 Crite a !V V

, Reference Cocamant irji+e3.*d ?ro<*ed re 'Q . 3. 3..

1 Avoitor R. ? !- .s ' 1. 9' re 4 Date 6/26/04

' MEVIEW PARAGRAPH NO. .

. COMPLETE

~

i

,L ,? ,i:, 6. PROCEDURE CRITERION

- U The inspector shall then sign and date the checklist and forward 3.5.2 it to a Level II Inspector for review and forwarding to the

,Q C Records Clerk for filing.

AUDIT DESCRIPTION Reviewed Form 220's listed in Audit Point 4 to verify compliance '

to the above criterion.

I

SUMMARY

The Form 220's reviewed were signed by an inspector, however, there was no indication that a Level II review was performed. .

(SEE AUDIT FINDING NO. I-062-084-2) 1

• e, 5

m.

w*Al*eh 48'

/ b i e gg D TITLE ORIG. D ATE REV. D'AT E . FORM NOR.

PAEPARED APPROVED REVISED WAG PROCEDURE 7/1/82 69A CKS IFD 07/01/82

< . r, .

m.-

• - ' L. K. COMSTOCK & COMPANY, INC.

AUDIT CHECKLIST o Audit No. I 'M 2-0% Page 10 of

• 11 10CFR50 Appendia B Chteria " t '.- y

, Reference Occument Braidwed Procedure t. 9. S. Rev. A Auditor R. S 1 **8 ' I . Sumrow Date 6/26/94

~

REVIEW PARAGRAPH

• COMPLETE NO.

IN' 7/wsA. 7. PROCEDURE CRITERION Hangers fabricated in the fab shop that are not' assigned a 6.1 permanent ID will be identified and marked with a unique

, control number. The number will be an alpha numberical desig- '

nation (example CF100). A log will be maintained .to control the issuance of the unique numbers.

AUDIT DESCRIPTION Reviewed Form 220 and shop identification log to verify compliance to the above criterion.

SLMfARY

! The results of the review are as follows:

I

. 1. All forms reviewed in Audit Point 4 had a unique control number (Fab Shop number) and also permanent ID (hanger numbe r) . .

(SATISFACTORY)

2. Reviewed shop identification log in fab shop and verified l that unique numbers (fab shop number) were being recorded.

Log reviewed for fab shop numbers:

FS455 through FS478 FS$27 through FS550 (SATISFACTORY) l 4 APPROVED REVISED TITLE CRIG. D ATE. REV.DATE FORM NOR.

! '" PREPARED CKS IFD WAG PROCEDURE 7/1/82 07/01/82 = "A t

L. K. COMSTOCK & COMPANY, INC. . i l

AUDIT CHECKLIST l

Audit No. F -nA 2 1)E Page 1 of 11

- 10CFR50 Apoencix B Cr ter.a I" X

-f 7eference Document 3 ri f ', ' d ' . c e c u r- . 3. 4 De" t I

aditor R. S1- 3 /* 'chr"'- Date 6/26/94

.=

REVIEW PARAGRAPH I NO. REQUIREMENT No. - l

• COMPLETE l

>~* JW y1 .

8. PROCEDURE CRITERION 9 Mien the uniquely numbered hanger reaches the field and is 6.1.1 assigned its permanent hanger number, the foreman will document a both the fab shop number and the hanger number on the appro- N priate installation report to provide traceability.

The reference to the permanent hanger I.D. number is the number 6.1.1.1 designated ott the approved drawing in effect at the time of installation.

AUDIT DESCRIPTION Reviewd Form 220's during field audit of fab shop and audit of QC Vault.

SUMMARY

All Form 220's reviewed had hanger numbers assigned as well as I fab shop numbers. This audit point was verified during Audit Point 7.

(SATISFACTORY) 1 l

M

? * , .*

l F 4 d.' gk l  %

REVISED TITLE ORIG. DATE , REV.DATE FORM NSR.

.sEPARED APPROVED CKS IFO WAG PROCEDURE 7/1/82 69A 07/01/82

-, - , . , -- . - - - - - -