Text

Applicant Exhibit A-60,consisting of 811023 Nonconformance Rept Re Failure to Perform Preheat Procedure on Listed Hangers.Related Info Including Const Deficiency Evaluations Authored by Sargent & Lundy & Pittsburgh Testing Labs Encl
	ML20214F013
Person / Time
Site:	Braidwood
Issue date:	06/25/1986
From:	; COMSTOCK ENGINEERING, INC.
To:	;
References
	OL-A-060, OL-A-60, NUDOCS 8705220372
	Download: ML20214F013 (92)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:.__a dN<I [I['d. ~ . A. CUMST0ct & COMPAN QA SECT /9 ' d'0 .flr gf ~ NORC0fd0RMANCE REPORT DATE_/ M _3 d _ ~87 APR 14 P8 :37_ COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY NONCONFORMANCE REPORT NO. M INSPECTION CRITERIA /REV. CONTRACT NO. L-2790-1 Dw Spec. Proc. Other 'M M REY. C A DATEll l'A@~ " ~~ 3dt.-i-bMA L Tf96 #3.3 47f N ~ 8 i ITEM (S SC TI Location / Area 364 Au $,lM 6-I3 $_33-) M lotA.b,pMS) 1 Q. C. Inspector f_/ Date // 23A) ,1 f [. - b 10 CFR 21 Yes o $ PROCEDURE-3.4.1 ( ) Reportable Item Concurrence by Q. C. Manager ", j y **% ~ jr "'" M f 4 I 0 DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE: 7M M %'N ' (. hec,k M b-No. of Hold Tags applied: 1 M33 L o 3.f.. I l Recommended Disposition by Field Engi (X) USE AS IS ( ) REWORK ( ) EC ( OTHE R,. I Explain Justification: Completion Date Field Engineer $k by Date /2-2 e s h \\ k Client concurrence with disposition: (Comments)

c. E q Nc.R ar L.G7 L3.6...

Mc R = L t. L (m r2ti &.a 'h Q f A:c R.. T k Mca Al la + kd n cc4 u.,, k J. ' u ru _ W%LSr2ftebL $Yk/dLi $cb T.Le 6%Llu mInh1. Il g C.0) Project Supt. Date ' CEC 0 QA Supv. 'Date CEC 0 Field Engr. Date C S' N /'cD bcE CORRECTIVE ACTION /DAT . LETED PQ R. "9Jih. jcm le s go 4, o7'7 078 s, o 19 l ,o 4-ALs o l ne l gge ) f s-tt-85 l $8 l Responsible /fKCFieldRepresentative Date ..n .x ns r e Act r$: w' 1 CECd E ~#441* f-/645 i na 00 b Accept ( Reject ( ) QC Inspector 3 n [ kW ate 7-//-85 7-/g.99 '(( {/ ' i om l S@o o Distribution: CECO Project Supt. LKC Field Engineer i j. k.vReco,rgild j. iQ l CECO Q. A. Supervisor LKC Project Manager D CECO Field Engineer LKC Q. C. Manager ,8/7 5/] Formjl4 ROM .AJT MRW PROCEDURE l

~ ,.1 ~. ;, ' 'RAI,0 WOOD 4.1.1.1 QA SECT I -, k k.COMSTOCK & COMPAN. NONCONFORMANCE REPORT COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY NONCONFORMANCE REPORT NO. N CONTRACT NO. L-2790-1 INSPECTION CRITERIA / REY. REV.C.R DATEll-TA-% Dwg. Spec. Proc. Other

h JcE.-t-3imn LTf9n F'43 s

i Location / Area 3 (aY A wt $sll 's 6" O

3)

M h ITEM (S C PTI Date Af,2*f/) Q. C. Inspector t 10 CFR 21 Yes n PROCEDURE 3.4.1 ( ) Reportable Item Concurrence by Q. C. Manager [# [ i 1A, . m J' Y MN DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE: L" 7 C' I M TDI ' Chu.k U No. of Hold Tags applied: 1 M.9.7 h 3.7. '/ Recommended Disposition by Field Engine t h E. (X) USE AS IS ( ) REWORK (~ T Q Explain Justification: Field Engineer $tios4 (dt,v44_ Oate /2-2-$t_ Completion Date R\\ \\ (Coments) c Mc g er G, / M3 k Client concurrence with disposition: A I gu. 4 n c g.. E cca.E (o 1 h m cu .d xu% r eu t e a c e = r. <. ?, ( w ) Mkkts rtitAldL $$s/2L tbb-YM W s m inin {< J, gCyProjectsupt. Date ' CEC 0 QA Supv. 'Date CECO Field Enqr. Date ,t N# l'*V CORRECTIVE ACTTON/DAT LETED NR O K O 7~7, W s[y 078 o' Q r AL.So EGt, CEO.c j r S-2t-85 ) Date i Respons1bleAKCFieldRepresentative s .x KQ ] E&gMY-/6-3.5 ta e#c W 7) M & for Adequate Corrective Action g ? r C. nspection e 7-//-86 A Accept ( Reject ( ) QC Inspector 'h'd-9S I WJ ~~:._ \\ Distribution: CECO Project Supt. LKC Field Engineer Q.k.Jeegrgilhj D CECO Q. A. Supervisor LKC Project' Manager CECO Field Engineer LKC Q. C. Manager g3/7%,,%.,l 4 Fog 5/ ROM AJT MRW PRDCEDURE QAS4

-- { .( L. K,C6fASTOCX & COMPANY 4 9 BRA m. 0 4.11.1 .P QA SECT Tjils COPY is NOW t t. OrtlGINA_ AS OF AN DaTE /o-a s 0 C0r*40NWEALTH EDISON COMPANY NONCONFORMANCE REPORT NO. N CONTRACT NO. L-2790-1 INSPECTION CRITERIA / REY. REY. C R '0ATEll.11=% Spec. Proc. Othe . lcm.- \\- TAA L TMn 2T=4.3 ITEM (S M C N TI M(eY Stax $ I b b O

N "
IN '

Y~** ' W Y "2'I' N ~ WN.~Y',736"I,Y3T4 S) Location / Area 3 4 1 t Q. C. Inspector 7/W - Date Af,2*1./) L 10 CFR 21 Yes a PROCEDURE 3.4.1 ( ) Reportable Item Concurrence by Q. C. Managerf'8 [~ j' 1%" m OESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE W N' " M8 8#E W Tr* w fer6*md ch k ab No. of Hold Tags applied: 1 Y. 'L J M 3.T. Reconimended Disposition by Field Engineering: (X) USE AS IS ( ) REWORK ( ) REJECT-( )OTHER Explain Justification: l Completion Date Field Engineer Sk(Os4. M_ Oate 12-2-8t \\ Client concurrence with disposition: (Connents) CECO Project Supt. Date CECO QA Supv. Date CECO Field Engr. Date CORRECTIVE ACTION /DATE COMPLETED FOR hpFERENCE Gy'd) a Responsible LKC Field Representative Date Q. C. Reinspection for Adequata Corrective Action: Accept ( ) Reject ( ) QC Inspector Date l Ofstribution: CECO Project Supt. LKC Field Engineer CECO Q. A. Supervisor LKC Project Manager Q. A. Records Filtj CEC 0 Field Engineer LKC Q. C. Manager __eaunaso 4,..ovao navisao nrus oaio. cars .=av.oara y ROM AJT .MRW PROCEDURE 5/]8/79 Form 14 QAS 4 ..-=.%

._i. __ mwoJ LL mL L-.1 .,w. :. .~ .. #a m .4 ,r * . g'

.,?

Qi, i -$.a e

. -r

..r .c, .s.~..

p SM.

~%- .4

i.e. a.J y

' ^ .Lr ws g fj. .-B Ret *%sf." ty ,u,n. : ':.*. '~ ,9 ~;c..:- p.- e-w ~~_ ^ ,c.4. %_-x <.. J. W # "' f ?..( L A,,'. ;*. N;t, - . M c) ? .1 .g. Y? ~ ~ ' ' b? .E ' ? E -14'?. n,A5$V.'. 45's? l l c.=- 33 ... 74 e,.'.4 r.- l .. ;2d.dr.. l .n \\ .:d:- .~~ '~n l ~ I 20: W. 4. Elias 'W

SUBJECT:

Woa-Canformance Reports Braidwood Station S & L Specification e L-2790A In accordance with Quality Assurance Pro'cedure 915-1, copies of WCR S 447 are being transmitted for review, information and l Keoolution, it needed. Resolution of NCR by November S. 1984 would be appreciated. g -4.*., i 6 Iclnl8V I ..-T. E. Quata J.G. 1. Superintendent Braidwood Station TEQ/CAH/ajv (0012F) EOO E OENE Y tun @na.f(LRLiiUL beiLI E. R. Wendorf

w. c. cl.cr

,gy,., D. L. Shamblin E. J. Hanslag .,,j M-O. A. File 52.1 Contractor, if-applicable L. K. Coustoct mg , 1]

1..

e O. ~ ...f I - s ,r .. a... .+ r -g.., v- - J .g. 3.,h...e.n. r.- -l'[& &-.. \\*'i ;iN.'.Y;&* : '& . _q E CT'_' 7g s.' ~ ?Nb.'.'C-Q-R{h .b5 . Yr$b-Q' s- =s..f g_ f-Q6-M. a. - . ;.F.% p .3:: n. ;- h,. ..~. T - ' p M.y.,.- _.e .m l ' ( _'. -9

Q-

.s t

.a_. a -_.s _m,__ -s __...__-m s a h.- .-.-_-..__A- .A E.-----4_

-6.-

m s .. r. ,,,,,,s. .=** c::3 * .fr ~ p# f.- j a A sis &C 14 iG P'" q RR 5.y Wu. 'bY ~ WW .s .np p.- a,Lj,9 M,g g \\ ^' s ~., ) ' g ~o.9 w Whw # e g**' # gm 4-y .g .w, 4.c'* es s g : :::'. + us he M

k g

( .. +,, g & s ". ' 1kk " c . s jW'( ~ ",..-

VA t

g' y g 1@" [ a., - /-

t. V..

pg a nhre F, 'P) ~

e. :

... w / i,' -as__m=,,* .,~p. = W .. p f. ' 9-fL a y, - .n F

~ y g. Q,~ I. ' .'. Mr.e.. - 4:.,.., "..,,.. "? m' ,e r ~ ..-:t. f8. . 4: -,., m. 4 ..a. ..f.... r ; histaa I' '. ~ A., Y?<. Tar;. d' .g., a ? '..f Syn.es -. ~' ..d, Yt . EtD- ', cf y.,. '=. m,i icii v FIct ascY sv u)_m trou ~, '. . r. . 5.' r.' 2 .:a; 4 ,;=~~ e-part 1 DESCRIFTION ? Describe The Deficiency (Attach references) w J J e d J b..o E, sti J,... a.g ~ l \\ T La. sd.a 1&m L I s" LW' w A M:l l .b.% ..g, ~ G _.E .,t. y i t flM IMCDW0t n~nu i na.nuk UhLI ?

e

'.s s Part 2 EVALUATIGl 2A Safety Impact Yss NO Does this deficiency, whether or not safety related, affect safe operatio / ~~~~ of the facility. _,f,,,,,,,- 2B sipificance t 3 4 .& *zus no in resources la a breakdown in QA Program apparent which requires $100,000 2, ./ to re-establish assurance of program? y L, necessary to rework structures, systems, Are experditures of $100,000 ~ ~~~ c e ts into compliance with approved design? l necessary to rosatr_ atructures, systems, Are expenditures of $100,000 ~ ~ ~ P ,,ccuponents into compliance with a WW.6~ e-Yance tr1Y54R aE.-~,i ~ '- x -2 %- ..e;- - approvedfinaldesigninadequateio asu I construction Permit?

_--...___._.___-.______;~____7 / . /- 3 .s Trans. No. E5 /00 ~1 Y ! 21 W Date EITE CO'MTRACTOR MCB TRAMSMITTAL FORM i l BRAIDMOOD COMSTRUCTIQM r .Chech D. A. Gallagher

J. E. Keinosky I

PRON: Ceco Project Construction SUBJECTS' Contractor b N NCR No. 3 8[ l' In accordance with Quality Assurance Procedure No. 15-1. Section 5.2 Rev. 10. dated 6/21/83 the attached site contractos NCR is it beirg routed for your review. Please indicate your disposition i below and return to Ceco Project Construction (Nord Processing Typist). Sargent & Lundy. Braidwood office, has reviewed the Recommended Disposition ands t }- Approves the Recommended Disposition 'l l Approves the Recommended Disposition modified as indicated on the documents listed below Rejects the. Recommended Disposition - installation to be reworked'to conform with design documents Cannot evaluate the Recommended Disposition The approved or modified disposition has been incorporated in the following sargent & Lundy documents: Document No. Revision Dalt Tkm OMtsswp of R E M met q c, D ec'onaw a 71oAl s7 pow wr 85 atMrneo Bf A LM NC/'. i T o M o m 1.as o B f C E C O A W 2 % 7 TMI6 ITEM (see ATTsenso of ) .1,n.d ) L) II ~7-B4 sargent &Tyfhy // Dat. 00001n \\

1 t~ .~ 8. -,n s....w a j NONCONFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND TEST,' ' LW ici m. II temmesamm e temas Station or Site Location F^'N-I

o. E d&cA m % tz. h en d.Ab(

t,.- t m i,, st. W:.'.~. 7' '~', w + U+.km J uJ Q ~~,<'~~.'-",,.14 2 m

t..,,.

u. .s.w. ff g,g. c.am o o,,,,. .........-o c, .<o. ,c, ...o., a. -..

w. -

a co.<,o. u a. tnincocowo Qch .lo-p +

-x 6%804L. NR mnB 27"' GrdhaL>>24 o 3 Pco ichilfI
.onx unitaric s g.can cia raocci.a O.onxeini.orraoe1.s l ( - 6:nt:4-ion's' io.. r.u,i in.ons unirano. L nre n Guae w = m ecc. ca l H t vAttsAltu N s u n'il. l'.e l l. aN
8
... c <o LV %. tiO AA.,h$ Tr. kEb-<.0 $c Cit.fec8- '" U ' '~ .m em,;m... m. s e Esa c.mt..- s .' " " " "u.. o-S u u ,j i ... c o .e.,,.< o a (LLetuai,.Lu . i,. ex 1.bv. C.Luk. u:.p rA t' Art: cta:u.d a y s ...... cu..i e n... s i Oo E "I'$ _ C en .1LA %
A
f. 4. _ A.> a r 4
& r t t.
e k
f2 r't'.E,.r$
s. d,nt.t $Lo. J tt N*J.L }
~ 7n h L K Cw D.d I.u<,... o. .<a ..............~;..ai,n d A. t it1 d 1 at-,weh 0c 1 to.. c... fin..a hr.a u E.cA. A.i.t. AWF. ..,.3.... .~. -o. '" 4.u. 2. o.a a- a a w I e v., . - -.o o. .... m m... o_, 1 ^> .... = errnt%i5 nn! l VM WL U.n D w ~ "'~~ i .x....._o._c,.._.................y,. 1 1 SfG I I DO c :. ~... a c. a. ..o t no
o....
c. .m......... l
l ~ NONCONFCGMANCE REPORT L. A COP /S*CCK 7 COMPANY. INC. 8'mewood 4111 4 1 s r, 5tur.x m -/#y snt _,,j,, of _/,, l ', NONC:n90RMANct ntroRT NO. Ab.6 A oATE 5 945 ( INSPECTION CalTEnlA: OWG. w.m.smuA R EY. A8 SPEC. 1-2/9/) f, pnocaouns. #.J.S Mu A oTwen #./J Af/' \\ ITEM (5) DEsCRIPTZoN Mdtni /bL-r raLCCATION //// 4/JfP' Alp Alad;. - - 1.* / ~M /J '_ z#6 l'. ossCntr71on or N uronnnuess 4p,w-dad t.J5 tot Aapounus dm b> bah'd was o.J ph . ru-. n n.p l p u a %s..s.i,,oe n s.r.4, p & ak e. 6 m.ga, a%Q \\ 1s0's: nd & n 9. s.c % su~ TOR REFERENCE Om,,V n
e. _ex NutaER CF NOLD TAGS APPLIED /
QC INSPECTOR,,4ny / 2 - -. DATE em.sv i to cPR 21 PnocaDuns 3.t.3 vas O No nePonTAsts iTsu coNeunnaNea av o.cM.a62Mb er inu n.co -Po.mo., gd':' g-C- a=cT xxyzazz 7a:TzrzcATrow Nof l fy ML 6 &L couc h hSTR.act.Aa* M % W " d 63 WW l gpg.p)qemm: : = =..;. = = =. r= = ==== m - e c = we,.qth % _ -.r, n-W 1 ff Luc paar. Man /ozsr oats 1 4-b 9 O sy - f}" V l ACTION To PnECLuCE REPETITION: ~~{~Qg M$LCe J WA'$ b d @ C' % l .g g cm m wouw ___ Lxcenoasc7uANAcan (on osslGNEE / ATE ) Us-k u C dISgCd&CO l uaNT CONCunnENc3 WITH otSPoSITION: (COMMENTS) C@( V \\& [3 - <g 4e rewc(k ha % 67 bbb C ?)L-l< 7%fp1ADNA bl8Y k., B1 ' caco Paoasc7 supt. oAra esco oA 39. anta caco Pisi.o aNo. 04Ta l enee neo 4,,noveo nevisso rm. oni.e. mare any.oaru non= nom. j now A.sT rro enocsouns s/is/7s r g ,3,o1,,4 i l i ~.--.-,---.,-.nw,- ____-,nn
/.. REdiEWEg ~ ' INT."b .Il wdJXTIVE ACTICN COMPLETED .i m., j /0= 9 f* Rf5FCE-SLE LKC PIE EPRESENTAT1VE DATE 1 Q. C. V$RIPICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION l REJECT i QC INIT.TAL/DATE REASON FOR RFJEL*TIOtt N N [# M REMARKS / ACTION 15UCEN: Akff. h/rtA-0 A bi byS!ki0A A/6. h kfd.tb4h$ / % A EP amechm /errM n s DATE NONCONPORMANCE CLOSED //-/ Y
QC IM b;//l
/ REVIEWED QC MGR/ DESIGNEE kg w1/- DA / -/9" COPIES: 3.KC PROJECT MANAGER LKC ENGINEERING DEPT. p G.C. AECOMOS PILE FOR REFERENCE ONLY RECEIVED { i)m@MNM* n OCT 311984 4 EMSIM Mii. C2,R k* i., n 3 m ' Q I w.. PREPARED APPROVED REVISED TITLE ORIG. DATE REV.DATE PORas NeR. ROM AJT Iro PROCEDURE 5/18/79 g3ffgjg4 14 4
7 O O 6" M 4 e
kJ 9
&, g* 5 gh.y gg .,.s
:. c...
1746.p vvA 19 1-\\ & -4 A ded.o e 6reoe<. <o pecae.ws uMecasz uwo ts Gooo. 4th 60h5 00 (?96hpv(+39104ol dou)60l%- 9 g g g t g E E E,b ~ i (. LKdL ta]Cg 6td. l oc \\ i i 9 D e l
90$# .s i ,,) ~, L. K. CDirIOQt & CGfANY, INC. 'IRAINING SESSICN 9 g, 7 - ( (, - 8 4 TDE STARr T END 2-m 3r Pos m CN L-W- *<i-Vf 67.e.<swu -(. s..e.3. (fuw) 4,s.s.) Sauzer: Ser.ortoaa 3,6.4. 40 N.> lkod N J lptAJq fg. M Jv.4 5 s.J IT'ta i.; f#4 W fo W KiMAL dr % 1/4" fifichsen A4) 9 6 AM F7dffAL., WM "5/4*' ( m cecu esr ( FOR REFERENCE O!! s NME (ST="= Badg4i NAME (Signatuts Badge i NME (Signature) Badge y h.O) 4, W 4'46 l I l m.. c. . z. N. .I. -,
=
l
,. -.p ~ s I * '% g L K. Ct'mP3?p/3K4 COMPANY', INC. Braidwood 4.1 1 y NONCONFORMANCE REPORT L,,._., , &.,,. 9, 4 SYSTEM IC V f /A Sht I of f /S.,8h NONCONFORMANCE REPORT NO. A,d SI? DATE .306-0-335Y AV INSPECTION CRITERIA: DWG. so.r.o-3354D01 REV. V SPEC.1 1"Ift3 PROCEDURE: Y $ S QN. f OTHER 4 E.] Asv.C. 70*-tmo,e dos M4cr,are ITEM (S) DESCRIPTION se.t /2TA/3 M A LOCATION . O ~ f'S1I y facan&L De 6 um% ai n - dra **/I9 70,T /M/ '/ N ~ "I~.. 4TC DESCRIPTION 'OF NONCONFORMANCE: k/)AM(2. ' (zog.o-3393 $, 2st. A Doc.s car v.xnrax,- s.a oxcAr.,.oa.s c,e pa:a. l &a4 ez inATCR..=M s kTJ Gc Srcerc., b Abr' u,164.0 erd T*o A Hggt, 3}"uasw coc oM ( Sl/7 ). 2tF. J. K C.)qA B P al.3. 7,ast.c;? 2.8. '/. / ' 3.8. f 2. N C^lrMA PECHE4r Es cto-casesor Ts CL5 ' -//,4 f NUMBER OF HOLD TAGS APPLIED / OC INSPECTOR li m EATE 10 CFR 21 PROCEDURE 3.1.3 YES NO E REPORTA8LE ITEM CONCURRENCE 8Y O.C. MANAGER - 4 di' TddP l' GhpWEE/M ~ RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION: h REWORK n REJECT OTHER .E,XPLAIN JUSTIFICATIOg,. 4 a-mo S 4 G y- -J-Wwo- - Nr _"E. Mme DbMW. g y. SEE. ~ O 1', L JU.T. 6 ,,hu, ~ ' i A-V'E 05 O '$ % 2 Q3T;.C ';.-X ': W ~ *' ' -_R l - b ' b/. M4 COMSTOCK PROJ. MGR/ DESIGNEE DATE l--lb-bk // Ob AW.[ % "E C-eA. ORREFERENCEOM[^gg ACTION TO PRECLUDE REPETITION: g y u g.7 g Q.7.g "^ * - - - a M DA,E, a -S,- P-EcT -.ER - DE,,. /y r-CLIENT CONCURRENCE WITH DISPOSITION: (COMMENTS) BOG (~ d4 m, L h a = p ;.-T'$7'% re ^ M 1: rw a w ~ a u 7' a. ua - m If;~1 u N & s k Sln()nc: ~-$Whyu6Y jdVl- ?)bb 97h 8 4.. MROJECT SUPT. DATE([4 ; d g g OA SUPV. DATE CECO FIELD ENG. /"DATE ~ T c a. W '* h y /sy tt[W(84 A s t l D ' APPROVED REVISED TITLE ORIG. DATE REV.DATE FORM NSR. E 14 l R y AJT IFD PROCEDURE 5/18/79 03/01/84 1 L
VAULI C ID00D 4.11.1,. 34 pt[. i $VI ED Lc0msT0cxa CoMPAN,.#. ~ ... s
NT.
'. Yd :
so. set [ ] TEs t') NO "16I CLIENT CONCuttENCE WITN'0!SP051 TION: (CONNENTS) + o CECG PROJECT SUPT. DATE CECO QA SUPV. DATE CEC 0 FIELD ENG. DATE CORRECTIVEACTIONCOMP[ETED/ACTIONTAKENTOPRECLUDEREPETITION:- No Coewsww Am om hews.s. GEco. wn %m % %m hs, n.m e. Ch.Q.. -vo Cuss. Tes M.c.R. 9u. m v or ssgsa2AA h e. to\\Ame,e, % e.w s,Act %As libs.m.o T.occupogrxte.n ro re A% ss %q ycx.e.x:3 q.g Hc.sR, *' ~SA~E.~5. l OOm_ 9mh_ 1h ~X.-B5 l RESPONSIBLE LKC ENGINEER SATE Q.C. VERiflCATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION 1-
] REJECT QC 1-
AL/DATE l
4 REASON FOR REJECTION: FOR REFEREEE 0;E'; ( CEPT REMARKS / ACTION TAKEN: pp.s myms. st.S PM &cM d f ~4::;Gr w l AM** & G 7 ~ DATE NONCONFORMANCE CLOSED 9 - M ' M QC INSPEC E REVIEWED QC MGR/ DESIGNEE - S o 9* 4 OATE 9-/3 - M i.KC N E,. %3 &L?T. l l 0.C. iR0! l REASON FOR VO!0 (IF APPLICABLE) d I EU )!.', .....AAhC8_ g, a ,g ' hcHEA ) m !, ~ ~ i v k,. p e" u d, 'outumssUn4Et i ~ -W ' 'l. BAAIDWOOD STA110N g g%. s.
i: ~ ~ 26' ~ . :^ ! ong Qo l eo '46 ss2l'2r gh tYt gb e" s d ( Y$ 3g 8w $dsb je$* y0,9e r$ v1C! 8s# p rt o>!
H o
.5 Y! 8 g s3eyo. e$ nlO3 di g3 s1, 'e 5 ploS $t r$ eigp jp bg g6 s$ r1 otg, j 54I0 r$ eslg ff Pa vb'6 9 8H95 o~ 3b fs /jeB l, if
,{
% 0 [0 5 aE32 t E 5eg jf Fsw I rb59, f e p{i f#, i dJ. p ' '6ei
n. c a M w w " a " a u a a b sm c
nc i !li Il!!!:li;; l [I '1 jf -\\\\i l i
i
c.. -
e I.. x. m:00C & CDfANY. DC. mnmc SEsSim Dez: 7 i1-14 M STAE M END 3 "J' (Isaccum nr / M4 POSmW W c-- @ 4 - IV I " Peouoxa:. 4 3 9 (,tas.org aca oxe %( s.t o<. r. krrAcuws - ho.J. 5,6.4-l e,, s. A. t f2' kW'R 1 ~ FOR REFERENCE ONL ATHNEEZS: NAE (Siputture Badge d NAE (Signature Badge # NAE (Sip"n) Badge '/37 l I l c'c: fila, C. Mr:nacka, E. Netzel,I. DeWald
l '11-17 93 FORM QP 1 1.1 1151CWflRilAllCE REPORT FQ CSISTRIC11011 Ale TEST as.. !,2 2. g, station or site Location hd I 3_ l
==-in sem i
.. -. Aq W. h h4 re Andru.w0. l . -.c y 'a,gi...n =.L +.. _ a 0,dh. Ia d 2 L. k Cmb$t ,.Wie o u y,,.. g,,.. <.. a-. ac. a. eg. _=,, a 3n a .-.= T k.d.m,luA cubdr let.u& .,q/,4"'# p a um N /A othkeh L b&WXuk iJ ' " - ~ " ' .... ~ Ah c ^ i aA I Va ' &A dwtu A r,, rce 2, L. & Mn te. -n c-4 o/CtA' ( M. Su % Nc R = c@ g, *M C Qcb bSr+
v.x Obdfdd. _/MA.
m +5N ioldd. 2LC GA%dM.A. s Pto i ummio. )(
c. =cce c.,o= c n meio 6.d. ummia,F j
m. ummio, tiwnwe - - - m e i v ai.. i n,3 s ,o,.. ,i.... .. ~..~ -, Add.% / Jew.fA_t caled- " ~ ~ " ~. ' " '8 L K c e m. h 01 .a~z ' " " " " * ~ " ' nwA 2 ~%e wwJ ' _ menu mM NRY ene< nrrt iMPC E V rVK mrv w m ~ ' ~ ['gy, gggIL wh vn== ~ qb... Co c,. uC. C. s. " " ~ " " " " " %J K 1Lc acura&.wM sim.kuar = :n. ... a. m . tid rh %~Jtl] thi we wn A % cLe .fLC&, ( n..~.h c.uktk.& Akk.11.6C..m ) L K Gwh0t.u f ms.JuLM. t;.,mJ f.a meM e .....t... _.. - c a .% tult.ed (La //K/S. D. I. I l f u,.s .m.om D. 2 L _L 2 - N - C ..,, d a 8. m.. 4,A.rbs'~ e... - ............,.,.. ~. -. u . ~. ....... c.. - -, L KC-k w w I L.,A A b m.1;>.A.v_.A $ n 6.. nog .cu. u v u -..~--..<..............m-. L k c. ' 4., I ).d 8 : @ E b las.la.,.uoafJ.LkC C /. i aAL > n.L de L t a w.:..A w D A m o A t d Mo L O ft.:t C/t b H o l h M l e %.,,,w.i. ' L KC dc. ~.. A st..u E % u. 7 m b. M.. l I WN u n -. rca LAsA pc.b 4l4l8C h ~ A L. W ,..m.m._.... l ~. y,n n. _,..n y*4p. . ~ ~..c ~. 7 8
vle./g--
L,JZ'C, I C !.a% !.:.:. C'3 "".;::".. 1 ~. .. ~. = =. .n....
o c ~ l .l.....--.- OAmocwr O LUN:DY -...f $ y g /~ ~' ENGINEERS JFEB 06 leti._-_.! ~ reune.oee., ..castmenne etence ~ cmca o. sw=ces oo.o
7..
=?= 3 '
c
m.... twm..........., f-February 1, 1985 'j Project Nos. 4683-00 . n,. O 4684-00 A' 4.# Commonwealth Edison Company C* Braidwood Station - Units 1 & 2 ~~ ~ lectrical InstallationW'ork E S&L Specification L-2790 'E Ceco P.. O. No.. 231360 Non-Conformance Report - NCR L-667 Mr. W. E. Vahle Project Field Engineer-- h@H h Commonwealth Edison Company Braidwood Station IU H I P. O. Box 81 'V - Braceville, Illinois 60407 ,.}. . Dear Mr. Vahle t ~~ ~ --~~ ~ ~~ ~ We acknowledge receipt of Non-Conformance Report (NCR) L-667, dated October 11, 1984 (copy enclosed), with Mr. D. Eliks' letter dated October 26, 1984, covering the non-conformance described below: ~ The required preheat for welding attachments,.t;o hu11 ding steel in excess of 1 1/2"' thicknsss was not,obtained. ___._We.have reviewed this'-Non-ConformancE" Rep 5tt"and............ concur that the corrective action (Requalify the approp parameters that occurred in' 'ths field;,riate _.w, eld..pocedures using the -- i.e., no preheat maximum material thickness) recommended.pnster Section 16 is acceptable. However, L. K. Comstock should be required to requalify each specific ' weld procedure that was violated. All weld qualifications should be done on material thicknesses that are equal to, or greater the thickness of the thicker part joined.gegherefore ie'dBhisen that 7oh'.Ifp rohNCR_, L','6'6]Mowev e r all future feldffg r ihou be perf orme'd 'lii'.5ecdrdance.w~ith th. 7,. p7. eTei. t*rYquYaiii 3~W8..T. l'.7 '~ ~x ~.- .e = I O e %.n q q,.. s9 % w k mys a _. - - - - _. - - - - - - ~, _ _ - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
. a,.;.e.je 4ni.((.;.~.".. 7.-
^1:
4 cAn mT Q LUNDY a ouem,a nac a -, - e.,..e a '((W f*l:'$i '"/ , 'I? N ~.d* * 4 5.* 'b. ,'~.;th d ... [ ,3 i
g.: :p,...,,
Mr. W. E. Vahle.,. J. Comunonwealth, Edison Company 'g.4, 1. ' B. -{,g.y.g' Page 2 February.1,';;I.985 M p- ... j. 9..,; g.. 'N 4 4"' * % e f
.... c m
..e W, y.S '4. h.$; ;. e.,.. ' :s. '. i ny questions..ap'nM....gi,jLW
t...on the above, hiease advi. s...k.r:!' ;f* th,.&.g
.. d.. .f.a..:. ;C "If you have a., . ', 4 v... . r,.,4, p e. + .=, 'h'[3.. r.'l,' 'i.; :l1. ',: ' $ {,..,,.[.),.f f,% '.[v..,,]..,'s.( K. . <....hTours very truly,' ;*{. *JjfM.u 4 .s.,. r f ) 1 r [ f e k ,,,k.a3. Project EngineereniorElectrica'ly f]
( Ej,','E, ['h;,.Uh.'! ".Ndd.,
.. 'k,.., '1 ~. i t C' .d g,.,....,,. Enclosure " - 'F.Y .* '.j... . i <:.,..,j...qyi!%:: +s.lyf-l,. " *, ': a.. ' ;.'S F 7 iCopiesi J. D. Deress .',6/*l:g..E,,7.ph.) e>,,Q:d.,yh.h. h'., g. , ;.r., y, G. C. Jones D. L. Leone /W. C. Cleff l 'n2.M.1.hy[} h ?p,%4[,[M. k[h.. } .,M. R. Camba D. A. Gallagher . [ W;... r: ; t.,'. .'., '.. : :, 0.h.!. '$.,*n.'.( n.. .- m. _ i Aw;.:,9,.i,) g.jf..t.%y.@,W. q.) g. f @.$ Y ;s S Q - ^"{ ..'fr. ..v...... - }'.'- N ~ ;,>- T. A. Kosth - s .a .v u Q .J.h'4:$,,..WMJ. !@c.-. 0 n.- .q... . p/!! 3[i f%Qif.i h'I y
u..
@.ip.7..i 9.Ittif.).eh.YN y.d';/i:%:kS rj';W.'k@i f g; 3._ y g y. 3 1 ..,i:..<:.g.6.),...i,. 9. 5,.c... W. P...;.W.i.t@ .pr- . r ;.a. mi..- ..i a. ,3 b.':[I
'b
.a.>..ww.m wwmi. @wmw.wwwcewcu, k.a N' f( . t i E. h k#.5 , s. l t W 4. %.. 2.. / m m p W M w n w,'u. 2.. A m. y.,. w,.,..... .'?!.;l~,.V. .. w., 'L .a... h$ '),.,.E' P .k I' ,k - . I* '.'[*e'.v.m.v.f. & n.- u.'.. ;:. s.,. c. ,,N ;[ f J [ ,N.,.'. ),. ..,g c. s. '~., . h * ' a. . e.a. e b f e, e ...Y, Dh....
.s.,

u..a. :. -
' '
7..' ' 'Nf ?
t' 5.[h*',d' W.'1,'s AT,,8.5,7'M .k Dk Ml / l l 'ee--,----r--- -e--.g.----w-----.,-4. w. 4-----,---my-., --+- ,.-ww----.----w-i--,.-+------e,- .-w .---.e-w-.--v-------,---w-.----------------w--,---.,.w-3.-v---ey.-w
v 1 30-23 Revision 0 12-22-82 C00fSTRUCTIC0f OgFICIENCY EVALUATIOtf f 1 Part 1 DESCRIPTI0tf Describe The Deficiency (Attach references) I N LI E A O f b Ac% . he fOu-E .o b JiadLid fY3 b _u_, eta M M ud. o o .3 s Part 2 EVALUATIOtf 2A Safety Impact I YES NO / Does this deficiency, whether or not safety related, affect safe operation of the facility. f 25 Significance t 'YES 91 0 / Is a breakdown in QA Program apparent which requires $100,000 in resources to re-establish assurance of Program? p Are expenditures of $100,000 necessary to resock structures, systems, i ,g _ components into compliance with approved design? i \\/ Are expenditures of $100,000 necessary to repair etructures, systems, N A components into compliance with approved design? .Is approved final design inadequate to assure compliance with SAR and construction permit? i (
n- .A:E-PQR-076 WELDING PRO IDURE QUALIFICATION TEST RECORD (> PROCEDURE SPictPICATION GROOVE WELD TEXT R13 ULT 3 Reduseewomen isamen esse Mosensi esamifestien Asas Tessaeserenyih.sek 8 MAN Weting presses Manuel ersnessune Manual g N/A gfg p.,,,,, g,,es,ng IF-Flat Fneer niessiammothessen AS.1 Geise6 head aest Fliter snotel esses 3funnen ' E701s Rest Fese Wetenosesigrams N/A N/A Sh m gas 3/A Fleur I/A g N/A g N/A N/A Single er enuidoes aseg Sinqle /Mu.1tipie single er seutuele art 81D91* P". O.Utwesenis laarsunstier, N/A N '#'*"I FBlet test reeutts
"*8""
utn stes M utuote Pass Mas slee Single Peas Posineetiresanent N/A Meath y,gg,,,,,,,, M. Dinelli 062 1MO 't /M 't )M 1 3 1 n &- a //M
9AdC,
\\s
WILDING PROCEDUR$
W twee Pas
amus,
,,,,w, .l'** Dane se, seu a,,,,,,,, y,,, e SINCLE PAHS 1 1/8" 130 24 N/A 1" ~ l MUM IFLE ? ASS
V I
I 1 3/32" 95 - 100 26 - 30 N/A 3'" l 2 3/32" 90 - 100 24 - 26 N/A' g 3 3/32" 90 - 100 24 - 26 N/A A
Single,- 1/8" Fillet Multiple - 3/16" Fillet g
We the weerwyned. eartify that the sistements in this record are secrect and that the test welds wens eresered. wetese erW tened in accorsence witn tne roovrements of SS of AWS Dt.1, Strussural Weidag Code.
Base Metal Temp.
56 y h or Caritrocuir L.X. Coms tM & Co., 0 A1999 Due Date: 6-17-85 17,f_j4 %g l n,,,'** Q '39 bg ( R. l e Cl .as sa e c a. . sovso avmo mi.a omia. oan uv m,o= .h,,d PMcCEDURE l I e484 . 2,m .g _ & rt W m*A.. _.UW-s $2 6.T'.*.. f5 ....e,.'....,'. n-,. . _. m _,. a
.,, w. - - - 2.I$50 UI q.%'s.'h.. ~ ~~ Pitt0 burgh y,,u s,,, nun., l Testing un.2 r -.~..... s + ss. . Q, ..,, ~.. g,yo7,go7y ~ - - ..a.u. Rtpurt No: M k/O - 7// . Lab No. 8ST-- N99 t
9. - w -t kEF0MT

.;, _., g
" "* Himet 11anc.ods Welding Qualification Report Dater ,,7 - A/ - f6~ CommonveN'thEdisonCompany Job No CH-3175 I Cliont Project Braidwood Nuclear Fever Station Crntractor: L. K. Coastock C2ntractor Supplied Information: f ' Type f Qu lhfkcation '1Ie5 ding Procedure Position Qualified /[' - FL A'I~ ~ ' ' 1/ elder's Name M. D/AfFLLl Welder I.D. N [,2 Welding Process b/77A lA/ ('ManualorMachine NA AldAl _ ) Haterial Specification M-88b Standard A h/6 Dl. I-19'/6 s, Date of Qualification: M
Al-gg-APP.:.J '
I.l.. St ! visual Inspection: ACC A ,,/A )[ /)~ EN Bend / Fracture 1 ACC REJ 8AM Hacroetch Test C REJ N/A Tost Results: oruing Non-Conforming Not Applicable Romarks: Visual inspection of weld area only. A,f44, M C. W. THOMAS [ Ins por t or /La va.1 : .'r v i s o r /Ua t c3 811 o /WI}~ lT 3--Y-h REWEWED BY //AM '.. [ B. L'MEREDITH ' z h,!h' . -: y ..... u.............~.......... ...ga.w+=e.m.wgegg-J ...*o -a w .... ve 1.h Ar..* m y; ggg.. a. 4. 4 ev. . g-,,g
...... ~ a i.... a _ wm. 2 4 i...o c4 gg-- ~ ~ e 1.ECE-PQR-076 .s WILDING PROCEDURI QUALIFl:ATION TEST RECORD (., pnocInuns sPtssFICAT80N SADOVE WELD TEST RSSUI.73 ._ _.e, Mounsisuosiheessen M8 TeesRe sweepsi, sals Weteng mesen ~8 MAN 4 l. Manusi ermemnme Manual g N/A N/A p.,,,,,e,,,g LP-Flat FIhsrmentseemiheson A5.1 Salass. head est s701s ness pese Pinerness % N/A i Weesenemigrene 1 N/A IhegWisp pa M/A pw N/A g N/A N/A N/A Eingis er sodomie see Single /Multimle i 55 orsudosis ars Single Radiopreches-Unrosens Ezemenstier* N/A i = _ M_ N/A Mosessen Add MO O i i dAs 1 M. Dinelli 962 1 y,ggg a e 1 l , kir , ka. I 7// sig.g W L FORINF00?l0N.0NLY 4 s.. pas assa. seems of l-Jose DenB c. l i SI3IC LE PAlIS 1 1/8" 130 24 N/A 1" .a. MUL1 IPLE PASS
V i
1 3/32" 95 - 100 26 - 30 N/A 2 3/32" 90 - 100 24 - 26 N/A L 3 3/32" 90 - 100 24 - 26 N/A l
single,k/8" Fillet Multiple - 3/16" Fillet g
We me waarnened, entNy tnet ins s.tsmems in this record are sensa and that the test welds we. erseered. wetess and wesed in assersanse wMn ine reeuw,ments of 58 et AW5 D1.1. Sauetural Weisiing Caes. ~
sase Metal Temp.
56 F uomdasturer er convesser 0 A1999 Due Date: 6-17-85 ss,2.,ss %g .e. s-r-w l t FORREFERENCE0.U ~ ..s....e s.... _r PROCEDURE l "~7':.~~L&'iEE: , S. 'k..."$,. ... L-a.- ~... - -..
s..
L K.COMSTOCK ar COA. AY. lNC. ~ cast:T L.ECI-PQR-077 .v C ~Wtl. DING PROCEDURE QUALIFICATION'TE5YRECORD ' '.- . anoove wai.o Tsst nasui.Ts .Pnocuovna spes:Picariou., .,,,,,,isidesse es .Meer6si methanden.M Tessas swangsh,ask 8 MAN
8' ides aresus g
ufg
r...Manusiersesnes M/A p,s
,e,,,se,,,, me.ma.4.....i Puest snomisosulfieneen sa.t g.i,y,,,g,,,, Piber meus massifisseen B701A geog p,,, y gjg gfg wees mean pese n/A shigiduig gas N/A Pleur N/A y/g gjg Singis er muodote assi sinele/Multiole N/A 8 * "'18 hadleysalue uswesene 3___ ng Slagteer mutsele are nt no ggggny,,,,,, '8"8" M/1 % eregremien MinSles Muinese Pass Mes Else Single Pue p,,n,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Meeresteh M,eyesesh Pesment wesenent N/A 4.* O 16 1 B *A.
I%
Waldur's none M. Dine 111 e62 1eA&L e d o *, 1.aeorumry Test No. SIN' 7/2' g tf$f A '*C 95k2.,5 ..S M s .wal. DING PnOCEDunt C, Fee hasa. gamme og Jeanesse se. ses ,,s, 1 SINGI E PAS I 1 1/4" 120 - 130 20 - 22 'N/A MULT] PLE P WS 1 3/32" 90 - 100 22 - 24 N/A 2 3/32" 90 - 100 22 - 24 N/A }.* 3 3/32" 90 - 100 22 - 24 ti/A g / a Multiple - l
Single - 1/8" Fillet 3/16" Fillet We sie weertiened, sortify thet ine statemsnu in this record are estreet and that the test welds won areeered, wetoed ane usted in essereanes wnn me rooversments of 58 of AWS D1.1. Serussural Weld 6nt Case.
W or Comrseter L.X. Consteck ; ce, 0 ~ " Base Metal Tamp. 56 F % g M o,, Q A1999 Due Dates 6-17-05 FOR REFERENCE ON'.Y ~ c . e=sse ..eva. mas mu
e. e. o.n nawai,oe.
.c PnocanUna , 4. e,,,, ease ... !. 4w. * **/ A h.,**,,, ,g, },.. (** ,j. .,.. 3
2 B.S.C. v t e.f 6 M.: ~ ~ ~ ~ r Pittaburgh r.,a Nn., m n., \\ E Testing scv. 2 (a.*.'.:='~'.= ~ = Labora tary ''* u Report No: M w//) - /7/M Pic'T - 9490 MEF0k7 Leh No. i of Misec11mneoun Welding Qualification Report Dater ,.;2 8.'5' Job No G-M Client Commonwealth Edison Company Braidwood Nuclear Power Station Froject i C ntractor: L. K. Coastock C:ntractor Supplied Informations Type of Qualification Welding Procedure fU L[ L L y U[][, [ Fosition Qualified M - //dP_'r FoA/ /2 L \\le1 der *a Name W. DILlELLI M b2 ~ Walder I.D. Welding Process 6 /Y) A N Manual or Machine MAA/MAb Material Specification M-68$ Standard d\\A/n Bl. l-19 #7I gg D,te of Qualification: M 8 6~ "E N N l Visual Inspection: ACC A l I""" 5# Bend / Fracture i L ACC RZJ N/A ghf~ I Hacroetch Test REJ N/A ~ Tost Results: forming Non-Conforming Not Applicable Remarks: Visual inspection of weld area only. A/ Me /7 C. W. THOMAS Inspertor/Lt. vel: C ervisotivatc h sr? w s h ] 1 7r >qw n t\\'i m t o s L p u;. - ( e. t t.mtmii - ~ 2.h/S5' gg ~- 'T.. ' ~ ' e e.. .ne... e.. e~ ** e. e e e .e.e e e$f + ^ i . :. s. .. _., w g u w.., h, _,..,, I
catr-t , ~, ' ' ' ".' L. K.COMSTOCK 8 Col <NY. lNC. y r-C WELDING PROCEDURE QUALIFICATION TEST RECORD ... s PROCEDURE SPECIFICATHNI SADOVEiTELD TEST RESULT 3 Assemed sesmen tensen use teamsue mesNe mien M Tommassesegeh,sak N ""' - 888AW gjg anweg essous 9 '8" "' tasamal er meshme gja 2' "^'4*aa**1 Pessmen et asidag ~ Pneur meselsessifemeen 1'11 GeissMised ust Puter meet aussifissaan E701A Aset Fees m/h E/A g N/A Wale semipress E#A Ples N/A gjg yfg Sti41*IO f5 Binele/Nultimie gages er meneste see N/A
* "14 AsdiagresimeUewesene taammets mageser assumes em W
Waldnemovest 'Puhnest sesses p,,",',,",' 5. sainSise neuensis Pas nass.ssSingiePam beesresuh neenresseh Pesman vessment iM S IdC MC s ICC N/A 1 Wateer's sans M. Dia=111 e62 e Acc e #ca. - 7/.7.'" F0 4INFORME0.,N;0NLY _. TA-dd; "d'"' 8"""" femmeer ('s pas mesa. m esma se, aus a w,, esses (/ f la SINGIE PAS B I 1 1/8" 120 - 130 20 - 22 'N/A NULT] FLE P W S. 1 3/32" 90 - 100 22 - 24 N/A 2 3/32" 90 - 100 22 - 24 N/A f.' 3 3/32" 90 - 100 22 - 24 N/A J Nultiple -
Single - 1/8" Fillet 3/16" Fillet We me unmarstynod, sortify tnet tne seismenss in tMs teente are sortess and that the ust wetes wem steested, weises one asned in semersanas wnn tne resimments of 55 et AWS Dt.1.Strussural Woweg Case.
0
Sase Metal Temp.
56 T A1999 Due Date: 6-17-05 Autnertand try 0 FOR REFEREEE 0""! .e. m.e m.... .._e PROCEDURE
400
- ?d.,, *, ..t. ..........- L- - a.s as k.. 4, t ~ " - - ". *. ' M's.* . s. ........ vm.... j l l
.. - ~ -~- I E. con'. STOCK & COMr JY. INC. casr:t LECE-PQR-078 WILDING PROCEDURE QUALIFICATION TEST RECORD fn0CEDuns spac PicATeoN encove waLaTas7 nasutTs asas teomrist sessmeden Teneneseungsh,sek theemssessue teenusi er meshme hw 9 ya i gjg .l pasmen ee.siem, 2P-vertical Pterseems sessihesen AS.1 Galesd head ust Peer moulasedhessen m ia n Wees seent grees M/1 g m/A 9 g/g Duqiding pse u/m pg,, M/A N/A s N/A Sagte er muhiese sees Sinala / Multiple WA Sugie er muldste era si==t= a r- "'II"8 "'"*'" Whiding suopassion Unwed PElst use resulu nainsee nautaste Pas anse sine magie Pass passess,segnen N/A hiesrench j besejsessh
AOO sBSC g #"6 sit!
i w,,,,, n. =-14 n = ee7 s A* C ,4* ?.,. a. LeberatoryTestpie. /1'/11% 7/E g E.r7:99ti ,.wito Paocioun ) pass
eses, genes op
.se a.a .e.s. 1 ah SINGLE PASi l 1 L/8" 130 - 140 20 - 22 N/A k N N NULTI PLE PJ 38 6" x 12" x 3" 4 \\ 1 3/32" 90 22 N/A g 2 3/32" 90 22 N/A N ~ + 3 3/32" 90 22 N/A h \\
single - 1/4" Fillet Multiple - 3/16" Fillet.
l We the wiseruipied, eartify sist irie stemmame in ihie record are servest and that the met welds wens arosered, wetees one immed in senereense with ine reeveremems of SS of AWS 01.1.Servesures welding case. 8 neanutsensrer er Comromer L._K. Cometock s co.
Base Metal Temp.
57 F M>C A1999 Due Dates 6-17-85 . Aspeerland by ' A
f

l$
l Dns e 10R REFEREEE OMI.Y ~ d? Pnocsouna e.as . q...m...a,... M w..,.w....s
w',.
8 1.+.
'.'. '.. I b S.D. l.* l 4. j b ?n. r. ~ ,. y -...... Pittsburgh
r.,,,,,,, wQ.,
E > Laboratory ****** 7/3 Testing -- un.a
A~'?
Repor No: A /4- ./:- n- - - - FSST-9M9 / Lab No. k E F,Q.Jt,: T -- - - - -- --e t Misec11ancious Welding Quel l ficat ion Report Date M-N " NA~ Job No CH-M i Client Commonwealth Edison Company Project Braidwood Nuclear Power Station Centractor: L. E. Coastock Contractor Supplied Informations Type of Qualification Welding Procedure i Position Qualified 3 F - VERTleAL s, lleider's Name E, RAblLIUS Walder I.D. M97 Welding Process bM7 A N I Manual or Machine MAM/1A L Material Specification M-6S6 l' standard Ah/S T)l. I - l9 76 CN f 'p"=:"r v tr r; F : o-.'. Or,'7 Dato of Qualification: 2 -J/- N .r e Visual Inspection: DACC % NA .d ') ~ y k/l / Bend / Fracture ACC REJ 1 A s Macroetch Test CC REJ N/A Tost Results: nforming Non-Conforming Not Applicable Remarks: Visual inspection of veld area only. l i i Ina pee t or /1.c3e1 : /me /77' C.W. THOMAS 'rvisor/Date( 21_ /JO /A > M M !Y J- (( N/A ( E. L. MTREDim REVIEWCD BT 2 1//*!#I ........................,.............MTE . m... ...f..g. 3 _ 3,. ,a.,_. . ~.,.. l l 4 wese-.m--w--.w ..w,,r--m,..-,--r-e-e .--.w,,, .,%~ ~rr--..--,-,.,-, ..w.-.
. ~ .--.--~ - - -- . - = =- s. e.. CA ST:* L. K. CO&t3TOCK ar COA, ANY. INC. i LECE-PQR-078 i WILDING PROCEDURE QUALIFICATION TEST RECORD ..Pnocteunt srst:PicATsosi enoovt wtLeTasT nasuLTs Assesadgeomen teamen test A588 l Asessdes seselle 6en 9,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Waldes ereens e W/A l Manuel ernaslune Mamal e. N/A i p.,,,,,g eg., 3P-verei=1 l. PRear mesut sessifisemen AS.1 h ust Puter meme semitissaan n7ain Aset Fase Wees meet pas. M/1 g W/A j N/A Pl N/A Sis $disg ges M/1 9 M/A 9 N/A 31
1.,eu.r
.,A F. 4 ,,s st - = _e ..._1 r.., m ,-, a . 4,. , sca , oi..
0RINFORMATION ONLY zm##377 s..
.P. i. Wundmetasmus fem tea. so, une a we, seses 1" 'h l' SINGLE PASU 1 1/8" 130 - 140 20 - 22 N/A s MULTIPLE PJ SS 6" x 12" \\ z 3" 4 1 3/32" 90 22 N/A NN 2 3/32" 90 22 N/A N 3 3/32" 90 22 N/A i \\
single - 1/8" Fillet Multiple - 3/16" Fillet i
l We tne weerugned, sortify inst tne statemsnu in this reseril se sortest and that the est welds wess arosered. wetoed and tasted in assersance wrin tne reewremenu of 54 et Av.'3 01.1, Structursi Weidmg Caen. i o Manutasturer et comrasser
3ase Metal Temp.
57 F A1999 Due Date: 6-17-85 Annnertsed by lC FOR REFERENCE ON!.Y ..e _r PROCEDURE Wl?.';' '..g.8> esse .,, y j,, . 3 3,,.....'s -- W. A.. .f l p
. - -. ~.... ~ L.K.COkt3TOCKfrCC. ANY. INC. QA3r:t g,ger.pga.o79 WEl.plNG PROCEDURI QUALIFICATION TEST RECO.RD anocsount spacarisATMus anoovewatovastnasutv noduse6essaien temmen use Maurisisessinseman M suas y nagescreepsh,sair Waldas erases N/A Maassieresslune N/A i Peshma 80 asid*8 Pharassasismesidensmen 15.1 seissneed ges pinar smessisamnitsamen 2701A Rest psee En Elsis mome grase j M/A g N/A 884 ong gm MA Pter un t gjg gfg agteermutumie som Sinele Atuitinia N/A gagnew meddele are Sinele nodisgreshan Userssonsa 3-= Weidig esusut Phat use resutu i Min See Multiste Pass Mas Eise Single Pass Messeum Meereeub N/A bO g,g,,,,,,,, B. Rawlina e97 1 M S 1 9 ,Am , ML
s. s Leberatory Test Na,flUh.,.Y!f c
g >~ B57~- 97?b \\ *WELDINoPaoCIDURE i he ama. sense es . g o,,, A an, see asa,,, vase
u8 t
l 2 SIIIGLE PASH 9 1 1/8" 120 - 130 20 - 22 N/A MllLT2PLE PJJS 1 3/32" 90 - 100 20 ! 22 N/A 2 3/32" 90 - 100 20 - 22 N/A
N t
3 3/32" 90 - 100 20 - 22 N/A g _, 2
Single - 1/8" Fillet Multiple - 3/16" Fillet We ins usesreigned. mortHy test ihe sumununm in this record are morrest and that the inst welds wens eressred.
wetend one asied in sesoresnes west was resuremens of 55 et AW5 D1.1. $srussural Weiding Caen. ,g,,,,,,,,,L.K. Comstock t. Co.,
Base Metal Temp.
56*F >2 b # A1999 Due Date: 6-17-05 Ausnartand try - ~ 2-9-PC o,,e C FOR REFEREEE GM _.e e....... ~ Pnocanuna s..i.i@l.. Q. &.y :pl%t.ku&:*'#1y eue y. 'yg , ::.,,.r;.... .s... .... ~ ~ -
L *ti.. w a..'s s ~ @n.Fitiaburgis y,,,, u,.., q., Testing
u.. 2 m'-=-c-
= . ( L'.: ' ' ' Laboratory ***A-?N EsVurt No: M k/ k E P O M 'I Leh No.
837~- 9M9.2 of Hisc e llanenun Welding Quali f icat inn Neport Date:
.2 86 - Job No CM-M Ckient Commonweialth Edison Company i Project Braidwood Nuclear Power Station Cantractor: L. K. Coastoch s Cantractor Supplied Information: Type of Qualification Welding Procedure Position Qualified M /~ - Ol/ERNEAD llelder's Name
8. kAk/L W %
Welder I.D. M 97 Welding Process S M A k/ { Manual or Machine MAdllAL Materist specification A-SAA I Standard A NS DI. l-N #7T s Dste of Qualification: 2-4-26 APPROVED \\ Visual Inspection: OACC 1 G/A R p,4 1 Bend / Fracture ACC REJ /A / / Haeroetch Test CC REJ N/A cut Tost Results: 4 forming Non-Conforming fiot Applicable Ramarks Visual inspection of weld area only.
s.. m meremrunP iMHV IJN NE((NI.OU, Y/2hI 5
bed, M C.W. THOMAS Inspector / Level: h {crvisor/ Dated 2M/J /MA'l Y J. dRr-REV!!WEDBY W4 ( B. L 7.!rctnm[ g,,,,,,,2.//dd 2 l .... ~.... -. 7 3 g., ..r.. M.d ~
M,
....s.
i 3 L. C COL *TOCK fr C..7ANY. INC. cast:T s i* i t
l.E12-FQA-079 WELDING PROCIDURI QUALIFICATION TIET RECORD PROCEDURE'sPttfFICATNN0 SROOVE WELD T337 ggggtyg Redusaseession sensen esse l
M8"'isi sessilumen W8 Tensile serengsh.sek
l's. ' " '
~ ~ ' BMaar N/A t mandasspesas a leanssier meslums g/A -(, Pauses 80soldal "*8""" ' Puestmeussesselussen AS.1 gaisagemasges: Pinarseusalmellemamen m7ela Res 7,ses mens meses press y/A 1 N/A u/m w/1 pw w/1 9 N/A 9 N/A Shaghheg ges i Singis ersesidets ess Sinele /Multinia N/A 88""18 ha 5 5 er sudmals ses FBississe sessee MinElse Multsele Pass less' Stas Singis Pass h Meeresseh N/A 1 O s Nd 80. NO 9 y,gg,,, age, B. Raw 14==
97 1
l , nea .Re \\ *WELDINGPROCEDUR8 i pas' Ben. assesof g g,,,, as 5 INGLE PASH I 1/8" 120 - 130 20 - 22 N/A Y ME,T2FLE PhSS 1 3/32" 90 - 100 20 - 22 N/A 2 3/32" 90 - 100 20 - 22 N/A
N l
3 3/32" 90 - 100 20 - 22 N/A y 1"
single - 1/8" Fillet Multiple - 3/14" Fillet We the wearsipned, asettfy set ine statemernsin this record are morreas and that the sun welds was aronered, weisse are tuned as semersonse wnn ins resusemems of 58 el AWS Ot.1. Structurel weldsng Caos.
er Camrassar l " Base Metal Temp. 56'F m ass u A1999 Due Dates 6 85 Agene,ts.g F0R ntIEDEMI'.F HKL ie,...u.-- sereanca 4=*=ovsa manssa tTu omir oats na v tsi,os. [ PROCEDUR8 k ease '-.:9.;!.y4.q.w p. m.'g.% p ....... v. i ~. ~r,y.w=,-wr-~,.e.--*, --~~%
AC8 Acoress Rer p) httke"gos yh Ctpcago, liht... Ago RECEIVED CUIl?4 October [A,RGENT & LUNDY 6 1984 _NAMg / ROOM Mr. D.L. Leone, Partner Nb Sargent & Lundy Engineers /' 7 55 East Monroe Street V M s/ pC.gjgl Chicago, IL 60603 Attention: Mr. W.C. Cleff U
Subject:
Byron /8raidwood Stations, Units 1 & 2 NCR f 667 ) Gentlemen: . ' N! 87 - Attached is a copy of NCR f 667 dated 10-N{4_for Braidwo ' d Station. Please review and provide us with your recommendYt' tom.". .V,ery truly yours, I @_Td U D. Elias Project Engineer l l Approved: S D _. D. }i JD Db1*c'C$ JJD/sb I/0981A/5217b Attachment cc: 8.G. Treece (w/1 att.) l \\ I
%L*Je] . o DATE October 17. 1984 BRDe 13.416 i TO: Mr. D. Elias
SUBJECT:
Non-Conformance Reports Braidwood Station 5 & L 5pecific,ation 9 L-2790A e In accordance with Quality Assurance Procedure #15-1. copies of NCR 0 667 are being transmitted for review, information and p resolution, if needed. Resolution of NCR by November 8. 1984 would be appreciated. 0 ioh,la 11 T. E. Quaka O. A. Superintendent Braidwood Station i TEQ/CAH/ajv (0012F) l cc: D. Elias E. R. Wendorf W. C. Cleff D. L. Shamblin ' ' ":,I K. J. Hansing O. A. File 52.1 Contractor if applicable L. K. comstock i FOR REFERENCE ON!.Y e -,,__4
FORM QP 15-1.1 11-17 93 (RovlO ) g. IOIColIF0RtlAllCE ttPORT FOR Coll 5TWCTIM AM TIST M us e. station or site Location AI I ,,.3__ w ta= ,163 kw cLtrAa1 _ta. Andru.w9. w ? w yn-', _ +___ d w.h / %) '2 ~<n.'~~ w v.-,,w k a we. .m. w L k o u a.... M,.. a.o a a a ..-.x, s3 ~. -C..- u mc: :: - e a a. .,c a.m
== :. .. ~ & WuA c.ubdr kt.uAAk yg.hf3'"' mtm N /A dthu.& L bML).4%3 wu ... ~. A&Au & l6'flhA du m -st ra) 9,_,L & De-O re.//+ 4 =~~, *WLR C of E # ( M. 6. % NcR=c@ = Q'c b lo-/I.r+ n:.r sk.# f M (I/A m /5N E.C. Gs h u h. 3 pc.o ich&I .....o= tamuc. )fou cui r.oen.s a cu.o,,.ocia ef d.ta mno.f i
u. m no,,,
6 nm n em e % - emo. a 1 4-d e v it i i.,a s.. i s s i0,... iii..N 8.* l i.. CAngg y g.4Wggagpq g L.x c~ tr.A AdLA A A4.u,.& o.akd """'"~" _.'- ~* .mwnn.h 2 u4Ase wh,mj 0~% c v v s %A:n ske auuamL.aAA amAma ~ ~ ~ ' " " " " " x.d.2.W L A :] 1%1 ~ u A % cu
==~ ... a m ' OM IIt O culud . W mu1 M.MEfe wa) n..........t........,-.............. LK. % tL.A . u f g w. a r t, m A_,0. TA u d.- d f u t M l e. .muha c a Aws. . y. v + - ~- n. r ...1.- i ii s...s...,3 ..n...i,i,.,3 . m.a ..c. a m ass M,fi '#8 4 *Af l U F. i MM Wut . -. _.. ~................... ~.'7, ?
o.
vos...o.wune e. n. ros.n.o cuv.o,..-o.s. o. M0 l i 13) -,' .. i...... i i. i% e D 66pesso t.C.0,.e. ess .e. C ( e.es.t a (e C e.* a etbas 6.sO. e 'l C4.e. wee g *.e .. e o 445 es sirf. a na. 4 8.##e. 6 ____,.._r_...
2 of j . s' BG-23 Revision 0 12-22-82 CCHSTRUCTION DEFICIENCY EVamTION l Part 1 DESCRIPTION Describe The Deficiency (Attach references) I NitJLLL J_0 d1.% t.., enCS lh 4 ,, Q m eel n _044 YD $. _unL4. Mf $ o v Part 2 EVALUATION PA PPP P&tnP 6 'Wt 4 2A Safety Impact YES NO / Does this deficiency, whether or not safety related, affect safe operation of the facility. f l 2a significance 3( l 2 No Y / Is a breakdown in QA Program apparent which requitec $100,000 in resources to re-establish assurance of program? I Are expenditures of $100,000 necessary to rework structures, systems, 4 components into compliance with approved design? l \\j Are expenditures of $100,000 necessary to repair structures, systems, I _^ components into compliance with approved design? Is approved final design inadequate to assur's compliance with SAR and l construction permit? I i
/ l t]' 4. ~,, .JtcE-PQR-076 .? WILDING PROCEDURE QUALIFICATION TEST REf.;ORD' [ (j ' PnocteuRE spic FicATioN anoovs wat.n TEST AssutTs ..%.g Reh tenesse east '.g Meieriet sessihamaan A588 A4 WeWungarenes 8"A" Tensasswongeh, pair TN Manuel er eneshans "*8"'*1 1 N/A M/A s p.,,,,,,g IF-Flat
pg,,,,,,,,g AS.1 Gehed. head test

jPutersneestesmasihamaan 237014 neet qwees sneens prese
' I'/A Fase j N/A l A'Wiigiding pas N/A Fleur "/A y_ N/A N/A c, Engle ersinddeW sees single /MultiDie N/A .E Engle ermutuose at single p _ A.y,tra
. gasminatio,,
N/A d WoWsng surrent FRiettest reesta L ,il.' "'""is sraermina ,,"/^ N uin See mutuose Pass ' Mas sies Sagas Fees l Penneet wesenent N/". Meeresteh W esteh, ( ) y,g,,,,,,,, M. Dinelli #62 1 0 3 1 9 M 9/At 9//dC 4 l l: l Lehe,etwy Ten No. / lUk ~ 7I/- 8.D~-9979 \\e, *WELotNG PROCEcURS pm, g,g, Westes,Casvam g 88 8 Jose O n e Am
vue, seves Y.
3INCLE PA: 4 .5 ,f 1 1/8" 130 24 N/A 1" e a. ~ j 4 MUL1 IFLE ? ASS
V
. J. 1..'. ; 3/32" 95 - 100 26 - 30 N/A ~ '2 3/32" 90 - 100 24 - 26 N/A 'g . I. 3 3/32" 90 '100 24 - 26 N/A .. j. 't: ,.4 . rn'. . y N- .Tj. . M. A .' d. ...a. .a. .u . a t.,-.. .y .~ .g.5,.;', s. " ' * :w. .4-Q, ( ' Single - 2/8" Fillet Multip1'e - 3/16" Fillet ,g .y ?.- l we n= =*reienes. eurtify met a n=meme in this reews no emees one that v. nn weise.e. oreone4 weises ans seemd in seeersense wenn w roover,ments of 58 of Aws a1.1 strussural weWing caes. Y 3,e,1 2,,, 56er u== = orcaan=ct,a.. o e m o a i co., ,1; wo,w d1,1,r/4 A1999 oue cate 6-17-es
4
.g +. qg.ygg-,g y m h...p u s y = .:y. . s2 *g.: 1.... <. r.. g'- 'r ..m ,..i 'O
sts sa n ta.
asonOvEn navessa 1874.4 0463. DATE A4VlalON 1.w... ...+,.v ..y.M .'$bcsounn~' Q "i%7,.Y.. u'Y' ?~.v.s.m mm ~ se a k s-
., s.. : ',.. M. ".2.Z;$50 vi 's.%5% ~ i e, b.: e lpl FillsbuYQh . U. ~~ yorm so.: n.q. s Testing fs.as..aaeo -.1-scv. 2 T;$*:"** Laboratory ** .g., h,,.. v. ei +.. ~ 0,~ _-'_ * " '"'geg,urt No; M k/O ~ 7// .:e... .. ~.. .= Y ' D" C' " - kEF0MT -...-...L a b No '. ~ * : bST hlS9 -k....7"Miii'eT1TsseouY$e,ldinu Quali ficat Ion g Report Date: J 6
.@.. i. ~
. J,:,. -~ ..i" Cli t ~'*i-Conesonwealth Edison Company Job N* 8" CH-3175 yp.e'n. - r-v Project 3raidwood Nuclear Power Station eq: Csntractor: L. E. Coastock . ~. ;.,. ~.... C:ntra"Ecor supplied Information: s. PAR REE RM l' g HE['[ER R Vfpe"df Quali i~ cation " Welding Procedure ,j Position Qualified /f - ['LAT
4 Wider's Name M. DnJs-LL i i
Walder I.D. N d2 - Welding Process 8MA h/ Hanus1 or Machine MAIJUAl- ?l;.l'Haterialspecification M-688 i A w s Di.i-19 7 5 standard s D$N7f qualitication: 1-4-?f APFi.'~ E PTi .:\\ e:rwwa { g. e w.nsp.ction: DACC. . f I. I.. $? isual I A ,v. v ... n... E,,N/A ... g :..e V,MUn'd//r~a'eturs' ' 0 : ACC RIJ 4 8)((/)~. gg $$6.7NetYTe2 'i EC 0REJ N/A l ' ' '.Q.6
E w :.n n.:s s m.. m -
m. u.,,.. :mygg Tost Results:
.gygi:: c.;yg.g., yigg. ,.g j ..ny~"~%h forming *. Non-Conforming Not Applicable s.- e.: ti.. ' %q4 - .v...... ....e.s. Remarks: Visual inspection of weld area only. - eN.r.i .....; 9,.g,.p . r y,.. ;. :;. gg..:.gr...... i 1.y,;.... ......... 19,.,%.g.,. .a p... ..,.w.m.;; q p Inspertor/ Level m C W. THOMAS S4. m:&;.. '. 4,... c. h & /vatc_ $ 8 ) E N N b W l' 3 W k f ...yglh)$~ .rvisor
. :f s. t. umosm '.. -
~ .REntwtoBY ?A l
c. ~
- - ~ ~ - - - ,--.--,.,-------.,-m----- n,- .-,-------,-,-een----- . - - - ~ = " ~ ~ - ~ - " ' - - - - ^ - ^
v IJtCE-PQR-076 WILDIN3 PRC:1 DURE QUALIFl:ATION TIST RECORD ' PROCEDURE SPEClr8 CATION GROOVE WELD TEXT RSSULTS Mo"tet smedfamosen ASSe ,s st 7,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, WeM s eemos Manuel ermeanse alam i m/A ,['% Paeseenof meMag IF-Flat gjg A5..'
f.,3.'
'. Pherseemiseemilungen.Pnermem as % ' N/A golead 4 send ten ~ E70:.a n.,, =h;, mummessNese 3 afa "M Stigidag gas N/A pw N/A nya N/A t. Engleeroutsimie een Single /maltiole N/A En,is er mutmate art Single Radiograohee Ustrasonie laarnenatior N/A mhldog merent DCRP WsMeg pogrammen N/A Photasse senses p,g,,, ee MinSlas Muttees Pas Mas Eas Single Pass Possiestwesenent N/A M****A Weiser's omme M. Dinelli #62 9 Add s Idt*, AEfd. s M C'd, 1 9 MA 9 Md, FORINFOCAB03.0NI.Y afgj%3/ wEtoimarnoC:nuna. Pam Bus. E"""" assesaf M enes as, see as e, yes, seses l SINC LE PA IS l ~'M.. 1 1/8" 130 24 N/A 1" ..j@ ~ E NOI.1 IPLE MASS
05
V a
..Q 1 3/32" 95 - 100 26 - 30 N/A g .t 7'k, 2 3/32" 90 - 100 24 - 26 N/A' 3" ./ ^ 3 3/32" 90 ~- 100 24.- 26 N/A If1 1
n,@

i...
f . d,,Y l d, . a r.'.%. --.u. AJ. :V-4 y c. . ?.3'. _ .o _ - .a. 2.'r * -p'
Q11,..
A.4 d
single - 1/8" Fillet Multip1'e - 3/16* Fillet
~'[ W e - -. s, nsd. ser. - - i.,es -. M, fist i,,s o s,. e s. e..,s.e,ed. a.s,j j < 3,,. wetoes and tuned in aemorsence.tuiine reouwements of SS of AWE D1.1.Struetural WsMwig Case. ,.g, 2\\ a
nase metal Temp.
56 r uen*cmrer or ca nrmar . M,,2, .g;#.q r A1,.. = e o. 6-12-es 4 .-- v.,,e e, ys .,. e. : e.. c -- os, s-9-Ps- .g, t g{- M
y. 2.'.,.
.,. ~. % h -,. w w.56ertD NEFCT..*#" .,e. m. 3.
.e se.
r.u n - a w.w a-- ... ~ 2-g a.. c-e .. ~... .'rnecanuna 'F '.. *s st asy a:.g 3-3$isb$dd.^. b l 2 . e 9 S apwe uit.
W.
9- -t--,-s---w w--. w.-e-----y -mge.-e,.,..,.w,---,.e--w.-.--.we--.---------w--
t.K.COMSTOCK8:CC .NY. lNC. ca st:T L..ECE-PQR-077 4,. s,,......s... v- /,
~ WELDING PROCEDURE QUALIFICAT1,0N TEST RECORD ;...
. _.pnocteunt sPECWICATION. .au..~d"*'6"s,. GROOVE WELD TEST RESULTS
s.. ins r.~.v.e.... V.
Ae 'i"* " "'** # 8 .c.aesensi mesinanden.. ASSS... Temess esempsh.seh ,ys,g ay,,,,,, anhw g/A. .g.,.g.g. - [,M, 4 g,,gg,,,, wiissessine e N/A . tv.. f w ounw.+ i Peter meet see'sMissaan me 1 Geise6headeast PharmealesselRegen =3701a Aset Fees i 35/A ut,is menipress u/1 N/A g g Singidag gas E/1 Pleur m/A 3/A M/A i 3 5 wanddWeesa Sinele/Multicle Sriple w suddnie are Sinsle Redispositic Uttregense Esenunstia,. N/A thidag esprest PWetnot sesides ' ' ~ 'uhames amersmien m/s Prehest==sersons uin a m neuenene Pese nas sue sinsie Pass Possust m oumont WA naserseien usaroenn gje f,,,, , /s,<.,,, Ag gjg i Walder's same M. Dinal11 962 , M.m, 96 w Labwetery Test No. MIUI" 7/2'. " g f.?,, $7~~4. n <g v 9 9 f o @s e e 'e,
WELDING PROCEDURE
.f. W Pas tems. fame W I Jouis Desse ..a-se, alas m
yes, soses i(,
..-sh b ra - 1 ,.,,,,, y,y 1 1/a" 120 - 130 20 - 22 'N/A $'37!.Md'." MULTJ PLE P LSS .hi.. l hM7;y$ -ry. 1 3/32" 90 - 100 22 - 24 N/A
V
. m. . '.g. ;.9. .. ~.,,. 2 3/32" 90 - 200 22 - 24 N/A c.9 .,d if 'pj]
)
3 3/32" 90 - 100 22 - 24 N/A g . = e ...s 8 .'?_ '.'QC*,. 4%
?.e%, %n. 4.<*..

.*+m 4
4, .. f .a s, .4, . fy y .W .y ' Multiple - - ,$rus. - .+.;.i:3Q . 9' 3.* e
Single - 1/8" Fillet
"-- c 3/16" Fillet.,: T We the wisersipied, eartify that tne statemenu in this record ere serrect and that the test welds wenn sessered, d weised one issued in socordence witn ine roovirements of 58 of AWS Dt.1, Structural Weiding Case, t y.,yg IAsnWeeturer w Canusetw L.K. Comstock s Co.
3ase Metal Temp.
56 f -i A1999 Due Date: 6-17-85 ~ ~ Autrariand by .e h $dW'i-d g.5 % v A'? Den j% ' ~. ~ ~ ' *-:.s e. .~- %?%.%rsW . ;,; y;~. n - ; - .v7l56.: ens eco van navmo ma oms. oats navisi,o= ~ ~.h:.7,.:.. ' - Av1. .$ssy.. Q,.Q'$ y,M'#;- M ydy. c . M PnoctDunt I $~ 4 ,,--.--,_,,._..-ew.,-,-.,m--..w_ _..-,w..--..---.

,.,,e

.r
... a. ; 2.B'. C. 7 's. e. f 6 ',,m, : ~ r Pittsburgh \\p> Testing v.,,ne,, m.n., E new. 2 .?..=.~.=.=.=.= V s-s - s <. aboratory ~ ~. Report No: Mk/f)- #7/,2. REF0RT Lab No.
M'7~-94/90 t
.l s.s 'd!.. og ~ 1,' - Misec11ancoun Welding Qualification Report Dater ,d-44-6 6 \\ Client Cosmonwealth Edison Company Job No CH-3175 I Project Braidwood Nuclear Fever Station Centractor: L. E. Coastock Cantractor supplied Information: ~ Type of Qualification Welding Procedure I Position Qualified M - AldPT 70A/TA L_ \\telder*a Name W. htL.(ELL I l Weider I.D. MN ~ Welding Process 6 /Y) A N I Manual or Machine MAA/MAb. ' Material specification A.9 $ d\\r/n bl. l -l9 7[ Standard N Dste' of Qualification: $2-J4 - 8 5~ TEPROVEU' hA MN t .E- ,. ;, Visus 1 Inspection: ACC hA b/ ac u'e ',1 ACC J 74-y MachoetchTst
ore, n/A mt
.. h.,. ; 1-- - q %:puji",r.,'4,p: Tost Results: ......I..,. ". ~ '.,, s_ D forming Non Conforming Not Applicable Romarks: Visual inspection of weld area only. . i,Q,3 a...: -
u. a.4 :., #:..
s_y,;q L... S T.:,; . v,.. u, r.s.. w Inspector / Level: e/r C.W. THOMAS ... g.g
3. g.qp
'crvisor /Uat cLN b /AJ J -O-W-ff .7. T.;.y;. c : -.....w ( g. L t,ne.ibi A REH MEDST y fj Q . s: . q,%. ; s. 2.- ,m -- ..n a. +-:wa.
4..y 44.m : ;:.,..:.:~~.;.'.......~...~...*.....'..~...-."*
i AM M' m, T. M a-> s %.. .e -,----,--,---,----n--,--.__.,-~,,r.,_,,n,, __,m.,.--....v-- -,-.,-__-,.,,--,,,,...,----------n,...,,,,,-w
. -. ~. t L. K. COAtSTOCK as C ATJY. INC. cat!:T IJtCE-PQR-077 .. $. n.; T:"-- C./
c. c. r I
WELDING PROCEDURE QUALIFICATION TEST RECORD PROCEDuns SPECIFICATION '" " SROOVE" WELD TEST RESULT 3 Redmo6essmen annen tem Mounel M TeseEs esempsh,sek,, .e.e., o,ess.
~
..=a. ""."a'n" e4 w an4=m1 Manusi ersmashoe ,jg 2P h gg g PWeer sased sessNeseen '181 1 Sales 6heedtem Phlerseeselsiestfassmen - E7013 Aest Fm .. i.. a.,. Whee sneal psee M/1 y yfg gjg Shgidsiggse M/1 pies, N/A gjg gjA Elriple er seutumie sem sinole/ Multiple t N N/A Singleer sedeste era ainsle Redisyneius Unresens 1servienet a. Whidag eenus PElst ust renses M/1 qp Min Else Multsels Pass Mas Else Single Pass p,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Meeresteh , M'aeresuh paesi,,,,,,,,,, w/A iM s /dc. g A fc c. , gcc, Woleer's sesse M. Dina111 #62 i. e ACC , R e c. - N 7. ? . F0 9 INFORMATlqN1NM,,,,,,,. d%.C g,yj,, unsenecanua y,, .amme nous an. snee a v, se es l I 1 gg SING! E PAS I - ~ - . g., 1 1/8" 120 - 130 20 - 22 N/A 2[k$ MULT] PLE P U5S, i.If AC-1 3/32" 90 - 100 22 - 24 N/A
V
..- h'. 9.'. ~ a ~ 22 - 24 N/A 2 3/32" 90 - 100
1..
4;.., ' v"' - 3 3/32" 90 - 100 22 - 24 N/A j 3 O ..r.nd'.,..:..:.- ,..2 J v'~9 i 4
re..
- v.. f*'*...1... ua. ,a .,n 9 ..g.. Multiple f.;
Single - 1/8" Fillet 3/16" Filleti,d i
_g;I We ine weersioned. sortify sist tne seternents in this reeerd are sortest and that the est welds wees arenered. N kN,._. weised ano tessed in accorsance wiin ine reovirements of 58 of AW3 Dt.1. Structural Weidiris Cees. r '.5 u.nutesture, or centrisier m. '~ o M M,h
Base Metal Temp.
56 F 5 '- [."* / " -A1999 Due Date: 6-17-85 Autnertzed try l :c.r,'.. :. Date TS B,,1,v,E. w=* ~FOR' REFERENCE ONLY - mw- ..g,.
==seasco 4 sovao navisso mi.s omis.oan navisi.on e x -.. *est an,e,. :. 2 +- a.:. - g., (m.g, '. 2 4. A E ..--.,_._,,._,_._.-y,..._,.__.__.._..,___,_,...,my
. _ 3, L. K. COkt3TOCK 4: CL. NY. INC. cast-t l s i LECE-PQR-078 .)... ~ WELDING PROCEDURE QUALIFICATION TEST RECORD U-PROCEDURE SPECIFICATION SADOVE WELD TEST RESULT 3 Redusadesemen esamen east g$gg assertoi semifiutie" Tessas serenge.sels . m.. Weeng eressus a w/A easness ermeshme sensual ,j, Poemen et weeding 3F-vertical paarmeus sessihassen AS 1 Seided inand inst ~ ~ ' - Puer messistenifiessen r7ein g, y,,, - ' ~~ Weesanselpress w/a gjg 1 g,jg Shegeding gas W /1 Fleur WA Siegte er seutdeis auss Sinole /Multiele gjg yjg FAsgie er muettels ers 84aala Aediogresiss Utvesenes Esenunetiaa N/A Waldng errent DCRP FWet met mudu Wedding progrusion Upward Min Sise Mutumie Pee Mas Sise Single Pass e. p,,,,,, Penneet weeunpug N/A Mastestela b O 1 Weider's nasne B. Rawline 397 1 g a k c. ,su. Laineratory Test No. /f//l*> ~7/I g En;9V91 'e..witoma rnoC DUna - teaseseCassess ) pas ase6 samme se h Osma an, sem as,s,, m wesee 1' 3,, 'lIC '.i . SINGLE PASl ; k
l, '....
1 1/8" 130 - 140 20 - 22 N/A e.. <..g... s .-a f...*. F. f t I 'sif.: ~ - \\ g;... Mt&TIPLE PJ35 nf.;, 2
6. x 12
,3 a N N/A s
6. :.g... '....
1 3/32" 90 22 s -.i. 2 3/32" 90 22 N/A N ~ ( .. rgc. :.. 3 3/32" . 90..,. 22, N/A \\ . ~. - s. ,y.
Single - 1/8" Fillet l
Multiple - 3/16" Fillet. . m. r W ( We the tsudersigned, sortify that the staternerits in this femord me errest and that the test welds wage gresered, ..D-b2 ' ' - + l wetend and tasted in scoercance with me reevernments of 58 et AWS Dt.t. Structural weiding Cees. 1 Manufacturer or Contraesar L.X. Comstock s Co. F-
Base Metal Temp.
57*F ~- >M/C j-2 A1999 Due Date 6-17-85 Aan g..ggENCE 00...shariandtry
- or M
.,p... 9%}}.'...
~
' - ' * ^ " ' i ~.C.7. esseanco asenovso navisto TITH & omia,oatt Aavtalose +--e ~ .c g M& M. I M i.. . i.,.,
2..
PRocanUR 5e-'-755ETt55i"
a. o U.ss.o.1..Ia.js?n,.- ~ ~ -~ ~
.= -..
~ ,,I p f$ll5bHYQh yarm u. m:Q. l ei. _ c -.c - - I l Testing -- =cv. 2 l ' ' ........ :...... :.......... La b o ra t a ry * *' ~ ',.. ?s::m.-:~1*" Report"No: Mul0- 9/3 ~..... g..i, yo, , mr-949/ , g, &9. *.7. ..s n.\\.m D +- His'ect'14niEun Weldini: Qual i fi ca t ion ' Report Date: M-4 ~ 9I ' .. - ~ Conssonwealth,-Edison Company --:7-Job No CH-3175 Client Project Braidwood Nuclear Power Station r. Crntractor:x'^L. E. Cosatock Cantractor' Supplied I,nformation: Type of,Qualificaeion Welding Procedura i Position Qualified 3h ~VERTleAL 1/ elder'r, Name
b. 24IA/L /k/S Walder I'.D.
M97 ' Welding Process b/7/A N Manual or Machine M4 Al/lA l_ Material Specification M.T S 6 ' ~ ' standard b/S Df. l- /9 #7I [~ / 'g\\.'..{pr\\ri /f: t~ ...::w ' Date of Qualification: O-4/ - Ef ~ isual aspection: ACC A d She Fr eture ACC J A // /. s
k R W **.
'..t4 G : --- '/ pu.p wr "' D. ACC REJ N/A l ..y;. Mactoet.ch Te s t +. __. ....g.g._. _ .r,4 .4 Tost Results: ';.;p.j nforming Non-Con for : sin g Not Applicable '9;;: - Romarks: Visual inspection of weld area only. t
:.---m.
Inapeetor/1.cve1: h a.s., /~77' C. W. THOMAS ., g* Orvisot/vatc0L A0M 1 Ah+ W Q~ -- S[ .:ie-. M.Y ( E. L. MTREDITH
REVIEWED BY
~~ i.iG.o:.~...m MW i ? -nmi ... ;.....;... :.....::.=...... : :...= 0M,.g/g ^ yD_ I "f,u - h.."....,**-'.**'.T.'. .,c,L;,.,ng:,*.a 3-*.% t. l l ..__m._
.. ~ _. _ _ _.. _. . ~ - =- L. K. COMSTOCK 8, C...., ANY. INC. CA St-? 'g/ I.ECE-PQR-078 j A. WILDING PROCEDURE QUALIFICATION TEST RECORD ..pnocEnung SPEC 1PICATION GROOVE WELD TEST RESUI.73 neessed.essmen esamen ..'bv., acessisisessifiennea Temelleemesseh,seh i ~. useing eroame e w/A Stensel ermessene 3/A . ;,4.,,..' '. Pemmen of weismg 3F-Vertical i?, Peer meet asselfinssen A5.1 sensedasend met :.h Par meselmanifasemen E701a Aset Fase e Wees seesd grees W/1 W/A g N/A Singidag pas
/1 Fispe N/A W/A 9
N/A Single er mutues pas Einale /Multiole gegie ermeldste et Sinals Redsgreeinis Ulymeenas Eseneneth N/A P .m n _.~ .n l g,ig,,,,,,,
n. mawli e97 5
d 9 d \\ . ma ,w
r #3?4

0RINFORMAT10NONIY
.a s.. __ P.._ h. W edme Cas m s Pee
ham, e
1" i SINGLE PASU J 1 1/8" 130 - 140 20 - 22 N/A ,' "..:. ?:., ,., v r N - 4.. -' - MULTIPIZ PJ SS \\ . 6. x 12 Ki:,7'.~ - x 3a a Y. 1 3/32" 90 22 N/A N 1.)fy.. l' t. 2 3/32" 90 22 N/A 3 3/32" 90 22 N/A 3 ' Single - 1/8" Fillet l Multiple - 3/16" Fillet We me unsermyned sortify inet tne statemems in this record are estreet and that the test welds wees presored. .b wetoed ans tested in accorsense witn tne reeveremerns of 54 of AWS D1.1. Structural weieing Case. "3
3ase Metal Temp.
57'T curer or Conneter .y ~*
?-
4. /,
'O* j7f m
(&$
M *.' ' .k.... eetpaagg apo40V ED agvists TIT 6&' 0447 04T% AEVL53088 .wsw ....w W g .,....n (. ews.g e { i % 1.' O S E S J W N A.;Y:[., }.]',]'[ ]) 9-%p }
.s., _ .L. it. COkt3TOCK 8: C ".. ANY.fNC. CA st::T a, 122-79R-079 - i .wt@ LNG PROCEDURE QUALIFICATION TEST RECO.RD fROCEDURE SPECIFICATION GROOVE WELo TSST RESULT 3 i ? Reduess esessen sensen east ) MeuwielsoeulAmmon M88 AMAN Temene suength, pair I Waldne eressa g/g Manusi ermesiums N/A Postuen of usMas d'-o""" A l ~~r y;.yy' '*. peermeetasestimemen AS 1 S N sest ~ t piner nessissusiheuen E7ela .Reet pese 1 ~ u/1 Wels meus pees g/g y gfg EW9 MO fis "O Fiotr "" l W N/A N/A Engle w eduele som Sinole /MuiHn1. N/A Sagle w meddele ut Sinale Radiogresha Utvasonas Esernenassor, mm* midlasmuneet Fanesse seems
'WmWareF eden gg, g,, g,,,g,g, p,,
g,, Size Single Pam
'***h E/A N4 1
N 9 Weider' anne B. Rawline #97 1 1 ,An ,ML umir yTenu finop 7/r t 67;9 % y,.witoina rRociouns. see-e ) - Jones Osma an, em m
ves, as SING 1E PAS; I i
S 1 1/s" 120 - 130 20 - 22 N/A x ., >,+.;. naz.T2PI.E PnSS ~~ 1 3/32" 90 1 100 20 4 22 N/A . 7<*k4 2 3/32" 90 100 20 - 22 N/A
N
~ ~ '. ' ' ' ' ~ 3 3/32" 90 - 100 20 - 22 N/A 'i .C i +. , g. l
Single - 1/8" Fillet Nultiple - 3/16" Fillet
~,.g;
s We the imeursigned, eartNy thetime sistemens in this resorti are serres and that the test welds wete eresered, wetoed and tuned in sneermanse wim ine resuremenu of 55 of AWS D1.1.Sarustures Weiding Caos.
.. lg.5;$
Base Metal Temp; 56*F Manscarer or Canusstar M NM ' N. }
I^-
f,

th 8 "- *-*

j,;:i.',
..g,. oggrange aeonov&D n8vtSED T8Tl=& cena.DATL nEVISION
* ' fi
... s Q, f. . -r. elG,J. gggggg . p a. 8h 3-f".' ~.. E
..,,wr,.p
o. - - _.
-'h.T,AL-Q. ' ;% ;4Y?WW;re- = 45.. .. ;. p,; _ w..,,..,.%,. g,1.wer25. 3 w e..f.. K. hi q.,.- p-y 4
l i'.!*E.Q L'I. 'I L ~ Fittsbhrgh r,,. m,., an. 2 Testing .,=>~-<'*~c- = m v. 2 ( L* ':'"* ' ' Laboratory *** ac~ port No: M k/d - 7M =Eeox1 i.ai. wo. B s r-94 9:2 of Misc r llaneoun Uc1 ding Oual i first ion Report Date: .2 8 6 ' '.* [,. ClieYt Conssonwdalth Edison Company Job No CH-3175 Pro.heet Braidwood Nuclear Power Station Contractor: L. K. Comatock
C ntractor Supplied Information:
Type of Qualification Welding Procedure Position Q.salified H f - Ot/ERNEAD 1/ elder's Name M. kMk[L /A/9 k* elder I.D. M 9 #7 Welding Process 3//)A N ,( Manual or Machine M#dll A /_ Material Specification M .S~n A Standard M hlS Dl, I-N 7.T N Date of Qualification: ,2 '/- E6 APPROVD .,.. - isual Inspection: 04CC 1 g/4 3,T,,_. [. Bend / Fracture N/A E' ACC J ')fc,ffj- /.- v,... YacrohtchTest CC. REJ N/A DMt /
..;.21s~
Tost Results:-
Q..
, :::... g.
a.,
x forming Non-Conforming 0::ot i,,11ca,le (".: Remarks: Visual inspection of weld area only. ?? ~ . ~., c_
>mr*
// C. W. THOMAS .j;[] inspertor/ Level: hrvisor/DatcJZ/X/m /77' .J - d Jb-REV!!WED BY 58'I"#M h ',,,, 2.NolW& -ww . v. ( 8. L Mitt.w? i,
n.,
7.* f"' C.. - .... sgne. w ,y,'
- ~
y *
a * * * * * * ** *
a-
~ ',gY'.g.g.p, . c yt, 43)e7.... ........ '.*******.f,,$T.. .r. 4 ? M.k?$5bYi 5 f,Q- ,.$?5 u.
,m __g-9 g ~ L: K. COM3TCCK 8. .1PANY. IF10. '... ca3f: <.e e' . ~ ' * ' + h pga.o79 ~ . WELDING PRO *IDURI QUALIFICATION TIST RECORD PROCEDURE sPECFICATION ORDOVE WEI.D TEST RE3UI 73 Redese6eession tenmea seet Maurist sessinessen 1588 m Tensasssreepsh sels
A wow 898888e5 SBIAN gfg 8'"""* 1 Manusiermeshme N/A Pommensiaatens AF=Owarhead Pater ment'someMuseen AS.1 s eised.need erst Puteraussiammlhessen 2701a heet Fase N/A Wate meet praes N/A g
N/A 1 Segitap pus W/1 Plos N/1 y/g yfg S agen w e eldeis ses Sinole /nenteiMa Slagte er meldete as Sinela Radesysshes Utvasons fissannadam M/A FBettest venutu M.se M.ittei. e.ss ...se.n,s. ) Prehesttemmerstere Maerostift Masreetate j
AO O

N6 dd 1
9 Wales' eens B. Rawlins #97 m , nea y \\. *WELDINII PROCEDURS ./. ssuesse Casnes p,. gi,,, JamsOsma 85. 88 8 a===us vues suuss t SINGI.E PAS 3 ~jp- 'l 1/8" 120 - 130 20 - 22 N/A /.' v s.?.6% 7 WLT2 PLE PMS . ~i.Ghy.y*g ,j [
'4 a
d.

a e %
n f 1 3/32" 90 - 100 20 - 22 N/A / .'.
gg' 2
3/32" 90 - 100 20 - 22 N/A eN ( 3 3/32" 90 - 100 20 - 22 N/A L ~':,2..
ge
Single - 1/8" Fillet '.
Multiple - 3/16" Fillet We ime weeragned, sortify that ins susumann in this record are serrect and that tne test welds wenn eraserad, . 4g' weises ane tesud in scoorsance wnn ins recurements of 53 of M'.'a" Dt.t. Structurst welding Caos. 'j"Z;*%.7 -{*., ,, A1999 Due Date 6-17-85 ~~*m
Base Metal 56 F Manidsensrw or Canusetor 0
mp ~ .~ ~
70.'
~e. ...m 4 r,.,( %~$,.d. 4 M. I . ~ p.W s..- ~..,.,. eageangg asseovg3 navt&&S TIT h& 944 947& R&VL&GN 8 ';
49'4
+ ' ~ rRocznuna l . % : M *+;..:..,. h L.... Y. . ~ f ~ W._
~ fa 3.~. f q. gr. NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (k ~ t. b / L. K COMSTodK Re C' 8'*** mod 411.1 eng O-
=~ /
{g Sht 1 of 1 NONCCt#0RMANCE REPORT NO. af $ 7/ DATE b-/Y-/'/ INSPECTION CRITERIA: OWG2es'-e JJ.W.4 R EV. V SPEC. 2.-2 7 9 0 PROCEDURE: Y B.3 Aks'. # OTHER M.J. J tar $* d ITD4(S) DESCRIPTION AM/-6a/ f.e.a6, //d.e. LOCATION V W of a/e /' sky. M O/as. Wen ma: VM/Ke si.as ajs,w g 1x q DESCRIPTION OF NONCONrORMANCE: Od.T. N 4N W A Rc+3. m kle ac is A!stoAw.. W AlJ.M. Aes sler-RcNav-Lke oF we' henr# Al Akeexam a}}w Alazoaus. r'keaaue q.pQC ycxiur;*J 3 gw. q, PMn
3. e. 2. # 4-s-eyr g
u. ~ g NUMBER CE' HOLD TACS APPLIED / QC INSPECTOR ..// M DATE'. 4-5-SV ,, U g to CFR 21 PROCEDURE 3.1.3 YES NO l REPORTABLE ITEM CONCURRENCE BY Q.C. MANAGER / 6 fee.7.c P.ECOMMEND E DISPOS M ON: USE-AS-IS RENORK REJECT m.n EXPIADI JUSTIFICATION: -._~,# 2__m,m,m,.> ->t_> EG NCE.4 M4Mc A/A/- G o / gg 2%.a ~~ u w. - e s w g.s.4 u a,~a 9.c. \\) e e.,p g y DATE Y ~ k ~ S N I.XC PROJ. MGR/DESI N \\ 4EE 4 7" 7"4 c N Eb 7' /N( $#EF. [ ACTION TO PRECLUDE REPETITION: LKC PROJECT MANAGER (OR DESIGNEE) DATE NSb 'A CLIENT CONCURRENCE WITH OISPOSITION: (COMMENTS) Mh mg, i [j,.gy W/ggoug Dipi Tic ~Qg TC N'R # V" n.a c e a n a Wobu 7~ N. L - ?:: ?_- !s la s / 4 $!$lhh Arlh L bLs 17fthl% 9 W, [ afj g1) p'PROJEtlT SJPT. DATE 'CIECO OA SUPV. DATE ' CECO PIELD ENG. DATE pneraneo Arenovuo navisso TiTta omia. OAT ney. cart ponu nom. ROM AJT IFD PROCEDURE 5/18/79 E M g3fg1f,4
, a t o ""T* N,^ *,' A lovs'. do ActicW '6d'O &E. /.$~ 99 R *O'M 077,078 'oM oorso t-s -es y 'Is ' 35%- A -S o R e p,idsco
M 7 3 We i
c;{, >-
)& s-12-se Q: RESPONSISLfgC FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DATE Q. C. VERIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION REJECT QC INITIAL /DATE REASCat FOR REJECTION: f*/b'fS ~ $ X =r>r RZMARK5/ ACTION 'DLKEN: It.., .s N OATE NONCONFORMANCE CLOSED 7'"/d'fI gC INSPECTOR _Oo w [ [ [ l) d / ^ REVIEffED OC MGR/ DESIGNEE DATE %}j /9 COPIES: LKC PROJECT MANAGER LKC ENGINEERING DEPT. Q. C. RECORDS FILE M 't e s. sca wzw@M m.).9zh w 4 caco un n a 4 4 & + n s g r-g- u THIS S A RECONSTTlTED REC COMSTOC( E N G. Q.C. D PT. NIT AL wm DATE # s-sG RECEIVED 3@N@l1 m m 2 a 1985 sc2ssea ,1 c0MST0cx ca..lHC. t PREPARED APPROVED REVISED TITLE ORIG. DATI REV.DATE FORM NOR. g3ffgjg4 ROM AJT Iro PftOCEDURE 5/18n9 M 2
1 y
~ e 8 .,g.
b 2 2 8 / c 2 S 7 1 K f / 3 R M ~ 3 A 4 ve E R s R W z P; M D'E"U n_ D t E W TA D D W eh"' s 1M ) w n NA s WS M c EN zx O R&'V R ~a T U a%w. M"" \\ R ~ O 'l =r E P T E A R l 1 D [ N o M"\\ O N 90 R I T OS n E A TT I a D m 4 e a L A 1 L s-AW N E a.W A EI T LD 4 N S R V 6 m. N A O 91 \\ EO W AV 4 I I _ M .R RC I 6 E E A 1 G I A LV C v. S N o r a - H O E n w AV R N I TR s f } O P s .#t PU S 0 / ]H A R 7 E N M, G A N o/ M A E H R [/ O F N O l C IS Y V N I I, VE Y R NA Y P B MO D E A C T 0 C M E K L P C S O N >n T I S M O C. o ~ K L 3\\ \\, Okl l I )
^ k5 A g a e s h h E I E i EE a d a !! = = a s I *.! a y a s : l = >> :i 228 f -2 1 g 5 o 4 s a 1 e s a N m C Z 8 m a 3 .s a 5 g S gkgs C O uj. 1. i %x 2 : d a q 2.c i: tag 3 e s 0 b e7 9 C ;1 3 2 si j j ~ b ( C Q c e: ~ I 'g' 2' ] (%[$ 2
x::
D ' r 2 5 =
Ig g
M c9 m '] I 3 5' a-A j ,j _3 l 4 C v$
I,-
l [ %Q d 4' z 1 1 I '5 84 + s 5-11 I I Tu g u = g i Z Q::' O t-8* .5 = 00 0 a i e \\ h. ~ =4 s-s 8. 1. =Ih- }:a s-
o a_
= = j E K\\ I , g m
1
,m co a O 8 NY l>4 s m
-c gy;
g
<,g 5 s i.- s l k N N N k 2:I E f v e E N ') % g f V} $U J 5 C D = g m' et e B d 1 '$ $,;J l l m E5 a IIIIIi 4 s l d 9 e s \\ 2 4 5 k g M 4 s M i e t s m y 4 1 3 3 I h 4 2 l l si y = .5 lE l*1 3 I ! g' "N g k, l = 8 4 ,,3 5*3 I
l. 3 j.,f -
g '//$2
t 5
5 r [ M l 5. ={lg . j,$ j E i y $ I 3 I I t 8 f l Il
= ^ - ~ egg yg['
e..
g .\\ . L. K. 03frIOQC & CDPANY. INC. ( mzanc seston t DGE: 9-I f-W TDE STARE /.' t o e u. DID 2.2d p~. CCxxLED BY Y2. Inn a ro lr. Werss PCsrZ1CN,oM AdC ~ 7' / I n2a uQtt% Sessa od CoNoueTSO oN-h o c.e o c.4 e.s 4,3.3 S a g;, aped 3,s;$ . g ? ATDMEES: NAME (Signature Badge d NAME (Signature Badge # NAME (Signature) Badge # f f8b / l cc: ff.le, C.11ennecka, E. Netzel,I. DetMd
l ~~ t \\ {., 4.; 7, r..~. w i 7 g, MONCONFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND TEST x a. "D' ta=== ese sans Station or Site Location F^<b I
o. E o_.
.., ib t ..o. t dL.6%.ta. Aucm.~d
u. -
yy g-. . <,,,. - ~. _. m A, h I d 2 t. k - ta=e lot. si,, =m a a ..o , p$,. c...< --o<, a.oc 3 ~..-, <> > a c - <,o. 1 u a. m =c omo o <i a 53:o-oa,ci.o- .in .. - -,o-f Tk nuuu.u.A e uk.at. A-t. _uMu f;,l f"' amtm N /A 6 A.,, A G- % k L,b % D no ' ~ ~ ' " ... ~ -. keau 24-l 6 ' ikuk Om et
cg

, r e 2.f 4 De O to n cu-
- ~ ~ o.,,,. cd%2 ( RS 6u n-Nc R = CW
MLD 9Cb lo-H.-suf-
.:.x f % 8 ( K E. $4 mli8Y 2.c. Ghiuk% cico-notuteA too. wCRE LIMITATIONS: wCM CAM PA0Ctt.3 C wo u CANNOT PAOCEED .03 4 A LIM 17A!!0MS d b ;WMl!0.uinwe b w w ffi,t.fusACL'). M ? LI.Ft.Als scRE t.IMIT&T!0 set H e WAt ti AIsinN A us3 6.. ast I si sN
. e..
is. c wns o. -o<o ca u.ca L K C.~ ~. tT < C,.A d. d. L [ 2.s o i l t 0.4tlMf-- ~' OE ' " " " ' ' " ~ C'E l Jte sudy..,nu, b_ f. wWe. J Nelo ~ ci l t c
a...
c se .Ct.o=.aow ete eo Co.8441 'as omtowo. (3 t s..... ct. a r u.. 5,o.L 6.0 b.v'L/k. *.LR L A l %E '[ D M.[ W K*k \\t f\\- t. f. OE '* J14
Ml_ -
2.'tt A A W.a._A o <*.-.7 tte it Je ~ ( 'd-[IL .>U c.tdst.i- .s. s/ muEMtS.Ette be.e.t) '7 rt (c..ect..a.c.o=.eow. o,o e.e=. c e %a os c c o o. . i= *e = a.. oi a o- - - il l7 d. d A'f LC. d1 -r .. Wi .'M . Cll 1 ). t,1 4 f tf ( K w..;cA a.a Aws, GDTI 7xt.Yc.n;... a -y gv. ~. *.< a=="~> m s,. - m. ;. ~

C"'88 "
A.N.I. LATE 3,, g.,c. .. c, m,.,,., s e
o. r s mW
? ii.s ...=.. r.w. i...= -acmes.o= o. aci.o= t. sea. to cos.eci s e =o<o eoe Ma ,3, e u.., n ,. anc.....o = 0. s c.,,. c,...e.c ....... 2..... =.
e..., % i a.
a.wos a= c assien o a a.,#oso c= coes i.0.
o*.. p 6.991lI700
..... =. _,,,,, -- m. 4 fil.M.' I ti.4 .St i $$ 984 D. 60 ects.s action.it aa w.ee C C e.=M C T* C a.mtio a How.He aceowail C.. cow.co ein 7f. Ja sta. sw?sas, o sg .c.o ..e = -o
s e / g-sh ed 4.'ti
t K. COMSTOCK & COMPANY,...C.
... f
NONCONFORMANCE REPORT j
[O SYSTEM IOS Sht I of / * ' NONCONFORMANCE REPORT NO. JI 72 DATE b-/Y-/Y sipoc-t-23/J.co.f A4 INSPECTION CRITERIA: DWG.mor-I 3312A REV. A# SPEC 4,-Z790 PROCEDURE: 4 E4 T 8 2 Y 4 3.3 OTHER A = r. 4,g r. c. ITEM (S) DESCRIPTION Owhd* 6uppo#f* W-3OLOCATION M /M/8bw24)ML-hM8' .:tNarnu ro.s vo e.s / Gentu D /hend a>ct.eet Ito2 eWDEM::d-DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE: Alo 16vn.,an ^ ^ ef BA$5' AE1ML 0'M77Nia Ep*ff.y g/ ~3em) 'nixk. ness ecnis rwo mege.g. Ref
t. K.C. hoc. 4 3. 3
%. h 3.8 4 e ATE d'" NUM8ER OF HOLD TAGS APPLIED / QC INSPECTOR NO h ~ / 10 CFR 21 PROCEDURE 3.1.3 YES REPORTA8LE ITEM CONCURRENCE BY Q.C. MANAGER 6*M-M O h REWORK O REJECT OTHER RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION: USE AS IS EXPLAIN JUSTIFICATION: Co eub.arct-llm Opo ET \\tW -S O.3 rut.usT%t k%mt.vt. m m t x c. a C. wo u.o wa. % uarcso9. COMSTOCK PROJ. MGR/ DESIGNEE ??M'l .DATE 8*- E - S s ACTION TO PRECLUDE REPETITION: koREfMf9Al Mo L_oM E.R. zAL A 9 E s4 o R., e 4 FOR ERENCE ONLY Wk COMSTOCK PROJECT MANAGER (OR DESIGNEE) 7 491re 4 DATE 8 - E 2.- 8 g O rw.y m / CLIENT CONCdURRENCE W ?wISPOSIT ON: (COMpENTS) p" p>- &l)e .,z_ 1 r tn 4.P.TS l ;~ GE //[8 4/so/gi~ D.O.Y.fkkS~ ~Mik i z CLr 6 PR6 JECT SUPT.' 'DATE CECO QA V. 6A'rE (QICO FIEL NG. 4A7ti f,, e h* M Y f'78~ PREPAR ED APPROVED REVISED TITLE ORIG. DATE REV.DATE FORM NOR. 14 ROM AJT IFD PROCEDURE 5/18/79 03/01/84
~3 i s. .l - VAut.T .g
( f $,,
REVigED INT.4me DATE CORRECT VE ACTION COMPLETED (JAEonsij s)~h/AS~ stSLE COMSTOCK FilLD RlPRESENTATIVE / 6ATR O.C./)ERIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION REJECT OCINITIAL/DATE REASON FOR REJECTION: s ACCEP 8-9 '85~ REMARKS / ACTION TAKEN: /gg g 4 g y# 7 h 7)P6 }erninaApp g ~ er j. DATE NONCONFORMANCE CLOSED DN'8 E OC INSPECTOR Y/M 8' f85~ REVIEWED OC MGR/ DESIGNEE N"'- DATE ^ l COPIES: COMSTOCK PROJECT MANAGER g l COMSTOCK ENGINE ING DEPT. O. C. RECORDS F /:di S IS A RIC0hS""JTED TEC01] COMSTOC( ING. Q.C. DE?T. j.y, IN," AL = DA"E 2-n-so A Te' .o N 1 RECE
,,. ll j j ECEVEDayo[y
~ 3, .,I Yc MAY001985' COMTOCK gg,'fg* l, COMTOCK gg,,gg, .q PREPARED APPROVED REVISED TITLE ORIG. DATE REV.DATE FORM NSR. ROM AJT IFO PROCEDURE 5/18n9 03/01/84
l [m7 r -... _.... I -t K. COMSTOCK & COMPANY, s..J. " ' l'*a idw ed $1i.1 " NONCONFORMANCE REPORT .s SYSTEM lb Sht 1 of Y ** * - - NONCONFORMANCE REPORT NO. SM 7S DATE b-/Y-fY 40&-33M.Co 5~ AA INSPECTION CRITERIA: DWG.20LF-/~33ff A REV. AA SPEC. t.-Z 790 PROCEDURE: LE(., Y 8 2 Y i 3.3 OTHER A- -m w. c. ITEM (S) DESCRIPTION Cwewr 69,wr W-30 LOCATION Gl.A * /M/iElw lAJA4L. h 8-/8 .mmu.co s -<o e,3 f f~earnru D /71Aend aJetsee Ilo2 EVIDEN;;E DESCSIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE: A/o --Ev amN C# EA:56 ME7ML "MTMJ la ^~ to-* S. g 'BEM T/hCk.Alss.s eget.s 7wo mcag.s, f REF" L.K.C.. W. 4.3.3 fARA. ^ *_ 3.8 4 h e NUMBER OF HOLD TAGS APPLIED / OC INSPECTOR ATE / \\., 10 CFR 21 PROCEDURE 3.1.3 YES. NO / REPORTABLE ITEM CONCURRENCE BY 0.C. MANAGER f - A"L-% O h REWORK REJECT OTHER RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION: USE AS IS EXPLAIN JUSTIFICATION: kR,.,rwe vs. C o tubdLT Suwo e.T \\M V -3 0.3siv7.u sT%t. l wtr H L Xc, qc. wrr ue.ss VdR.'P,geHeAr(150'), l COMSTOCK PROJ. MGR/ DESIGNEE /1 977/'21-O DATE 8 - 21_.- Fs O ACTION TO PRECLUDE REPETITION: ko R.EMA Af A10 L cRogER..r4 A # E r9 of e4 -'FOR EEERENCE ORY W% COMSTOCK PROJECT MANAGER (OR DESIGNEE) 1 ' A 77ft DATE 8-2,2 - P g O l 115E)t;:f?r [ pg CLIENT CONCURRENCE W ISPOSIT ON:(C ,NTS) g ,_M fcfco "GG 7(AN &d c a u L d A r -,i A ! ! R,,, c.
t. # 2'.TS
-u na a,e CLe6 PROJECT SUPT." DATE " CECO QA V. 6 ATE (pdCO FIE NG. MA7ti 8 Y*P 78"' PREPARED APPROVED REVISED TITLE ORIG. D ATE R Ev. D ATE FORM NOR. 14 ROM AUT IFD PROCEDURE 5/18/79 M/01/84
f D K E D C r 3 V 2 0 K ks.W %o 8 I 9 / 1 7 2 S I [ t 1 K / 1 E l 3 3 R R AT@mM' W Z A ~ i W 4 G v M C I e N S R E U M E J O [ C R K 3 L .BMW# 'o. A I 'My ? g ~ c' E j T 0 A ( D /. vcF { S MvAV e s_ ) vI N s, A a L .?1 m n E ~ ^N aU 7 R m m U g3 7 1 R O Y / , \\ E P ,/ 6 T E A R / D sI / NO eI 8 N R. I T OS n IE A T T y m L nL A s a L N A EI T LD s. S R r aU N A O o 2 EO R RC c r I r s s l E A ay a l G nI N A l H O nK G N s T e n.U 4 ~ R s) 4 O - C r P s .F b P
3 U
S + [ R W7 A~ / R fV A % N E G wJ e A N .t M % W A cL E H R i 3 O 1 a F T MW E NO d C IS N I I. V E Y R N A Y P B MO D C ET 2 C E K L P CO g / SN $'y 3 T I S ^ 3 / d b E [~ N' i I
.uc.MWL..e<.. 4,g ...m_- ..4=......,.~g' * * ;; - ./sy 2. ..Y .q ,;.*.y .."*.::^. W*.. ..... v- .i .i t. w. ...... a.....,J. : r.. s -.:, i s... a -' *
qt:,, ;
.,,r. ? ts < y..;. j...;.)
s.. :
i.
o.e.,.-.,n a. L 9 ;:;~-s.W...p.
.,...~,..y- .s. s : * * ',..'. g.<yt..s O.: 4.. f., ,y.,. m
s. g :dy %.g. l 7!: ?.::,.>M' f...y-f?$7hh.
,. y 1, ;1 ,a.,,......h.... ; s.. ;u..f.p.wr.w:. ?" % y ..w...~+,.. g.- .:. Q ;- ?q> - W r " % l l;,a,f :cV.. v.y. ~ : .r r - t- $~~ . Se$. k. k h .O ~. a*-%f a - Q..
s;-n.f.
.r - gq W61 : u,gVr3".-s*
rY 2..d*.6 f'.F.E.T. D;~ 'W
i
i '.kkk.,?b
s. -
4 '..-haf.* *':'g. II ag-QM:. uff[g<;D,p.*.?k d.'tjWW:. I%.;e 2,';;.1
.- c..
W r M. h-E*, %': p-fi l, - -x v,. u m i
c. -
e.Q. e.f.4...w r..,.,v <...,,M.,,",~',.<~- ...,,,,..e. . ~ 5 W.q x 8. /j.:'r yr W.,.. . us. 1 s r W; :WW IEC. 3 .r. w.:....;. .. y?- i.Dh.. k..}[.. [is@JY,.@ k.9;M,p...m$a.:..<.. ,g -- w 'Q 1EDS .,,, - u.$.. N,...*. u..>.
'.e,. P. :.r: :;,.2. r...2,:.. %..w...... a. r,:a..

4.. p.....,. :..
3
gl N
n,. $,:.; 5... S..; m -4 $* R.O.'f % $.,5*;. w. . :?.,;.'t,,:. .v; wY W ' Y. 4,..;,,. - . ? :,$.k 5 $.n,,.l-s ...-o $.Y. : w fw.Y'T ;'h - ~.'$ l$y..... l r.s y.. ~..;..%..::.Ws,. f. . h.Y ~~ ' r: , p.,.,,. .t....
-~fL'..-
2., :+.;w. ;.. ' h:-.. -f:n.&.Q.,;. %.. :.. a. ,a. ,., ;,1.: w..:-L. ... y .4,... r 4.s. .e, d "." -20. *, ;. . !.. ;% %....,.I'.;s
e
.s . - ~ :.- 1 Br.4M., E. lLas~1.Y..:?..,.J.i. 1.. v.. e... ~ ~ '.TO: ~ .x ,. -. N_.
SUBJECT:
'.. Won-Conf ormance -Reports - 3raidWood Station 5 4. L Specification 4_ L-2790A ' 9 f In accordance with Quality Assurance Procedure 915-1. copies o i and _ are being transmitted for review, informat on ',/, 667 resolution,.if needed. .~. - ~ NCR 4 November S. "1984 - would be
l_%
3 ~ Resolution of NCR by _ . appreciated. ? M id,/a ~ ~ + 1 ~ . 5-:..:st. E.- Quaka . /.; ?.r. ; 4.3.'..Supet'intendent., i.c;/;1raidwood Station ~,.. .".-.r-
.v..
v b '/ e t i, '___ _... _-... ,l, ~ ~ TEQ/C&H/mjv 40011F) - ym ,1 s -, w mi cc: D. Elias E. R..Wendorf i W. C.ACleff ".. ~ - l D. L. Shamblin WA*.- 'M.Y....";';. E. J. Hansing g O. A. File 52.1if applicable _ L. K. comstoc k -#.r<e.. - s . Contractor, _ r. .s. ... ~: -.. c. .. r (, 2
s..
n. ..n..:..J. -.: n,. . e... ...,s...... . - T.- a...,. ... +;. ....: - ;c. ;. ?.. : ; a-4 - . ~v... - 2 . c. . 2,..;. .. y .u 4], .m ..f. ....,1 ..s.,.: * ;;.. ? .:.l '. ; '.,.:~.i.. !.q ~ *:. . - ~ p J,, ; ;..,.-
t

y. -
p. .., f. ' ' 4, *.. ;. ; . s. _., .... c. 33 ~ ..2 w,; y ...~.a.,.. . * ;;;. a. 'i..- .x.* ,q..r -l },..
s. g *
. [-Q., .. *..,e. ' * -~. l. $, :. * * ? };}n*,.u,:.,f.}.:3;..:. -m. g n y-a p g..g : q. _;.s._.. A-'., w.,.. ! ;... phy. _.... _,.,,-:....;*..,...;..;.. u $ L..Q:..&.e .r s ~ = = ,-..;. c; =~ _a' -.,,,, .- =. a..,.;G:;.:y:a w p p y g* y 1 l
. ;,, ' S *, a.-l,. :*M<7-[ M $5 i.o=Q-). ' N..M ,.._.-mm... . ;4..
3 g.j.'[O:tc:....a =si ($,1
~2 Rev.lo .n.., : g,. , g:, ' '.'t %J.s " " ' ' a ; :;. w.. erk W.. - c.o g..P g,,{3 4 f,;,;,; 7 i Tg. x..Vi'A% l'$[? ':.. 1NNM1tST R 9 . o.vg%C. gNONORF0tMANCE R20ti 70t CatSTE M u. ;; q? s. 5 L[;[.] Z n W'YWfS Q TS %2dgiG %M .4 c t-4. "y; i ....s....... .... ~......,
d. @?h...,,&T w
-.. ~ ~ - - - ..c.::3 i,.3 . am..,.N /A' 9 ' .:q. t :. - -.. g f j.. _i. +. e .a ~_.,c - lu .,q /,a*r"# n la t.m c--
c. c n cw
_ w I n A. < d a d /u t..u d e k 34s4 a ~~--- v-xd,.u A $ bMi~, itrd x = -mW oc n _W ~ hus u QCh i e iB*Ek0.,utNC R = 4961! =,jl :~.:.s:' t otos' c ($.
p:0_g
(' nu EM I%. %% 2.9 mhe o a - A: a i lax: mm F 1_. - u a ~way a a on . A., _c t~m ema.e w ~' na d =~T ~' ~ 8_ l anun.=a mm o,....,,, I I ~c 2.U Z A 4 M L.s / A e w - f b p e_ ~ i
e h ' <c. w t e J.
/~ umb y ~.% utw L ~ ' ~ ~ ~ i ~~~= - o =_ l t< % :u,. k m &..uAA.nw u wa .4M e.h8IIIe 09'CD gt ses e.g.%,~m d C4
e sd_m.%.,au eM* k..L.au) s
.da._a_.,....J A n peJ @.f
J 4 t
r .u ',. O',% U (.k, u. e-u.,& _f,w l A b
u. i LK.c ttA
~. _ &d w MWS. .c Ls 'u. ~ ~" =. , -'~~fi b,#, b r.rr-m m k ..u.m .. i.. .gumumm.m. S.: - hgI ..a-m. 7, -. -. sus,- se 4 et.=== s e '.-. _;_ + &5.A.tEDn. N e L80 I I q A ,~ y.;. _-~, f5h.... s . - ~--- e.r ;.u{%.,,; g* .f ..s.. -
4 e4#4a ge N 4m CDuAl'W WD v
s; m ja ~c --~_
---.m
-*w.. -%m =%
~ W*n ggg.girs psy.cr gam. e _ _ _ _ x .5~ C W m.'.S$ . s.. -. Q..lR y.s"R f..Q_ @. M O.,Qt.:.N ' Y
-'^- 3 ' - _ - _
? N..* *'.,, : *h f,'if: \\ ' 4 ~ ^..','..~..:..~.s,.' ~ i.y,i. . s ---+=e'= .?l'c..>-. :.
u p..-. e A... ~....
.m x- ..? ~..#*,. ?.~. $..$..4..7I.a.y *i?y i" /.se.*i' ,y,;. f...' N...q& 5$ NM, sg. sir,*.?..,
6 y
f+ ..... v v.. y ~
Fa

f ? *;a.;e g
- W,,fA 5.d...9'.'.~.5.. $. ;;.' ~ J.. --,-ure mencruner wnumTrou ,. q,. J. ';' r,a >,. Q..,. :...m..,Cs.~....,,,.. .. j.b. s - - ~ ~ a- ...: 7.i ~::.,:. pe
.y;.q.E.*
m, part i DE8SIFFICE y m AE' J S { (,, Describe The Deficiency (Attach references) 1 ; %.gl A.a '.s. h u A I W % k' s J D.$ T k h d>a A e A aul'" ics o~* W s (
w.. k g
+ 4.- u t s t .noy - s-es @,s g. 'hr C. -u 4.F Part 2 EvaumTIM 1.4 l .~ 2A safety W n YuS NO Does thisleficie'ncy, whether or-not safety.related... affect safe operation /~ of the facility. _g TAh M P am i a P+ n t e. e= .n v r s e [%,Mfkjh k. h 23 significance m. M E in resources h a breakdown in gA Program apparent which requires $100.000 I to re-establish assurance of Program? necessary to rework' structures, systems, ' are expenditures of $100,000 components into compliance with approved design? . N e expenditures of $100,000 necessary to repair structures, systems,. . components into compliance with e@gg'dgy.,,}, .,.j,,,;
w ;.~.
.x -g
s__..,
M=%.5
_..e-c;.:y s.y ; 4; *..
..--pe an.e
2. !-t M tk1AE

- r b approved final design inadequite to assure J '""'"
~- construction permit? 1 o -.,,,---.,,.yy.,. g,,. 7_
/ ,s.
?

.. '/ Trans. No. M. i nns~ l. Date 121 -W BITE CO'NTRACTOR NCE TRANSMITTAL PORM BRAIDMOOD CONSTRUCTION (Check One) FOR REFERENCE ON '= ma.he' J. E. Keinosky FROM: CECO Project construction
SUBJECT:
Contractor A N NCR No. S 6 7 A In accordance with Quality Assurance Procedure No. 15-1, Shetion 5.2 Rev. 10 dated 6/21/83, the attached site contractor NCR is # being routed Tor your review. Please indicate your disposition below and return to Ceco Project Construction (Word Processing
Typist).
( [ Sargent & Lundy, Braidwood office, has reviewed the Recommended Disposition and: l Approves the Recommended Disposition Approves the Recommended Disposition modified as indicated on the documents listed below Rejects the. Recommended Disposition - installation to be reworked'to conform with design documents Cannot evaluate the Recommended Disposition The approved or modified disposition has been incorporated in the following Sargent & Lundy documents: Document No. Revision h 'T)+rr OM6SNW OF- &ll:sT lf C. Ox'UMegrAT/oA) 6/kww ADT pe- &AGO B y A l.Jd. C AJ W - rm r7m e s--a e m ey cew A m w 7 Sw b &W Signed l~ ~$f SaegenMjundd / f Date l l 00001n -_--...-..--,.?-..
rven w.., -... 11-17,93 (Rav.10 ) s IOIC0lW0ttullCE tift.3T FC3 CWSTWC110ll u.J 115T me hEL 1 .. g. stationorSiteLocationFra}d I -_.,.3__.
m..
ensmanagpmerinr:- es=====sa tan = ....w........,, .s. s V4 . M.... ...... M,h%h .te A%w L. k cm.c.,-. M. .,( %.-. 1 a O 4 /a A 2 .i Ta ~ v ia1 v =,. = =,
t. a c co.
g...=.. u a.oc o c3 a,., m ur a. = a a <> a. rk x.~ la <wbt b.uAL a /f=' a m in n /A m, 4 1 m h h h b 6 L % Q i G' Nb u 4 iVa
M A C m A
=,. r e 9, L A.
Dr n to.n.Aq ofMu2 ( PA. W Nc R ~ C9F3 ::,
WAR D 9Cb k-n-r+
l
..= in#(h% dM a.nh joi..mi a.::: a#w au c
w==,.oem 62.4 ummio# ,,o=mn.uo.Jfou=,.ocm %,u - _ _ m ,o.. W 'a mm. mmm., e.,...,,,...s ...m,... I ,s. C,n. 40 o n..gg bd ED"'OS L MD d h utw u.4 J'_tm W ud h 6 d g g H. v v s B MPfB M '" " " * " u 5$ 5e Y -aE A,.u d A *tS U rLe UN:W O - .mL2 rk %MI/ x61t e ~, A b dM8_ li f l A A,U ( i. 4 -. w A jt-w A.. d G L m ) b.a b & bJJ $.an d.len.,ruhlaJ ........g-..c.. .o. _....... .. ~ v F,M RFM4(tiiGt Ok7 l h iua.uA.w _.A K/S. D.I.I 54 4 n ......................<<. - W. M O a e. m...., - D s L L J - n r..., y.. y chyts s a.. 1. o m ...m)dAA -LLs o aluA s> N nie.2w. - ~W G S HNl >y LKC u .. c..
o. ca c,,.c.c
.......,o.....c.O '.La La.,,aouJL Kc L :... :A ... A ~ L,,.,.,,c. i.- -,'LKc oc. J.A+- o E.'. n,. - u itm-h J t..SL A. ~.. a ro1Abl_ Pc.O 44/or .....~..,,,,..,,,, . ca cu...o.a.c. c3.. a<. ... c a...o
L K. COMSTOCK 8: COMPANY,'hnJ. Braidwood 4i1.1 ~ NONCONPORMANCE REPORT Ib Sht / of / . "YSTEM NONCONFORMANCE REPORT NO. JM 7E OATE d*-/'I-fY alor-'-73M co ** A4 INSPECTION CRITERIA: DWG.1or-# 337EA REV. AA FEC. 4.-1790 PROCEDURE: 4 EC 1,,8.J Y 4.3.3 OTHER A- -m a.a a c. O Q) (,) ITEM ($1 DESCRIPTION.Cwwf bsMr W*3OLOCATION G69 ' */MhUw kJA( h /2./8 \\ s rwo - s o m, s Q f~eearm - D thend uJeted Ito2 EV EM'M;E J c# 3ASE Ma1ML b M774 y DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE. A/O -f, u.asu .f LL,, ~EEM T)NCE.NEG.S SQM.$ 7WO mCMg.s. ~ = 2sr /_.R.c. he_. 4.3. 3 i?ua.'vt,5.84 ATE ~/I' NUM8ER OF HOLD TAGS APPLIED / QC INWECTOR 10 CFR 21 PROCEDURE 3.1.3 YES NO REPORTA8LE ITEM CONCURRENCE BY Q.C. MANAGER G - 3 ':. -M h REWORK REJECT OTHER RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION: USE AS IS f b..- EXPLAIN JUSTIFICATION:kat,Mova. Co4borr Su no Er W V -3 0.3 4.rT. List u wrT H LX C. Q.c. wrr us.r.s Vta. ' Pas H s AT (t.5 0* '). COMSTOCK PROJ. MGR/ DESIGNEE 17? M DATE b ~f f - S O ACTION TO PRECLUDE REPETITION: ko R.EF16 Al ALO L.CM.6pE.It..r.AL Ao?.E d os._ c At 2 F ik pdfM Mi DATE 8-2,2.-R EM COMSTOCK PROJECT MANAGER (OR DESIGNEE) 1-g N ~ CLIENT CONCU iSPOSIT ON:(COMyENTS) fcfc.c pc.g,*4G f geje. in 4.7.TC $lh^^k deb;$' 00. SkkV~ 7Mi C sp Cfe0 PROJECT SUPT.' 'OATE " CECO QA 6A'rE ' (pdCO FIEL NG. 4A7t 4,;" _M / P 78-PREPARED APPROVED REvtSED TITLE ORIG. DATE R EV. D ATE FORM NSR, 14 ROM AJT IFD PROCEDURE 5/18/79 03,91/84
s .c e
y DATE CORRECTIVE ACTION COMPLETED w
& &m - -bh &_- w d'
i l n~A-g.g. gS-RE SISLE COMSTOCK FIELD REPRESENTATIVE DATE
~. v O. C. VERIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION ~ . REJECT OC INITIAL /DATE ~ REASON FOR REJECTION: 8 l l ACCEPT ( REMARKS / ACTION TAKEN: l
m.,
.a I DATE NONCONFORMANCE CLOSED OC INS,PEiCTOR REVIEWED OC MGR/ DESIGNEE DATE l COPIES: COMSTOCK PROJECT MANAGER ) [ COMSTOCK ENGINEERING DEPT. '~' O. C. RECORDS FILE I i I i v;. k.t ? ' l' . E' d.' ! ~~' 1: d N PREPARED APPROVED REVISED TITLE OPIG. DATE MEV.DATE PORM NOR. ROM AJT IFD PROCEDURE 5/18/79 E 94 03/01/84
f D K E 2 n ""-K 1 3 r 8 V 2 n" s . i 1 /7 e" R 8p-2 S I [ y* E 1 1-K / 4A 1 3 3-R a4 1 4 A 0 v 9 C M f e E s,. aD 5 R aI f U l s l u\\ n E J o n C k R L fa .g_h ( L \\ a*j e.d d, Y t E i g k *qwe_ TAD t. ~ 'y s f' { h. v a. vy s g r N v d "s h A n a n p ^R au \\ 7 T U 1 .b 7 1 R
,s m
u n / O '( ,'n n E N_ P 6 'T E i A / D R s / O wu f. S N N T OS ma I IE g A TT y = 1 L A r = T. L N + cn u A EI 's 4 T D s. S R r u N AO e, a EO cr I R RC E A n,, v = m { = i G s s x N A l H O nn N o 2 4 l p' sa a.u 4 h R ~ 0 r 4 h s .r s_ ~ r e3 l[ U 5 A/- / fv . N R E / N N. o m A G A cs 1 M E H R O ~ F N O C IS ~ N I I. V T E Y R NA Y P B M D O E c T a 2 C E x E P c S s o N 3 I T E su 3 o c. l K L R n 3- ~
e 1M~ an.1* y ,-~
8 i'
[' D K , \\ E DC s __ U V K 2 r n 8 n / E i-e 7 [ 2 S I 1 M AT.'W / 1 K eA M 3 E 3 R a4 v A \\ C 4 e nn S R R d D Y-E sa O iu N E i 9 O T C [ n 9 n" R K A afM L al Ar - WQ y: mb@n ? E h tw T c' A . w D / tuJu w a.%*Qg r Y 6 ~ iN K a x \\ T O g E v J O Rku I N ^R .]1 D f F R s / o.9 ~ O s E P 5 l o T a l A E / D S / R U i &aF \\s \\ ~u_ N \\ S \\ O N c A I T 0S 9 A
E i
T s-L A A i L N R m1. A EI 7 T D s. ~ S R s R O i N A O u s d"P f EO 7 R RC / F a e N a r, A E A G I NA A x R sW [ H O 1 T e M G n'" M. ( N t f, 4 i s) t - c F o 4 F s 3 F o3 fV N a' _N U S
s. *.A 4
s- /R n N E e A u.1 t M G I, N 1 A cs E O R H O F N ~ O C I T S N I l. V E Y R NA YB P M D O E C TC O 2 E P K L S C / N O I T 3 S E M D 3 O e4 ~ 7 C. / K. .O L M g lI i ,ll ')< 1
,l wc., -m m. _ ~. .MCE.9-. ble. na: i e, ;. - 4
s. -
e' .;>q. s,.
v.., ' -
.~.. + I
v. v...
..... :+w. 4.... . W y. N.... . ~ : :.- e .r. :.-.. .r T. n*.. ! E ,%.'*Y.. . e 1.c.. - ;, e ~ %., TG.L. %*:.:s $::. ivl:..., l:.. - Q; >:..'.. s.a.,.
y.,.
.s.s ~~ -0...Q... p..~ .. t a...:..:. y z v.; :.c. s. 'c .., <.:... ; m. <. l.M.t. ,y,.. ' ' s. w-:a. u s,::i.: r ~o '. ' : :..w:.. e n. 4...u,..
,-r.p...c

o
.7. . S, ...n.. a j ar5; . -:... v.....
~
- e. a.... r... - - m.r.... s. : 1. . ' *..m,. ,'-V: w.,.:~.. w..:.2..: e.d -rw.
3..m.. c.n.,..
.r. . < s. ..c:s.G..c.,.'. g,. ?.~.4,... j. a: w~..+t:n. M,~,. e-p. ;, r. 7,s. v k' - to p M. 3934. 2., >.,,, ss. mat u. e. p..... .n n . ls. k;... )n,b.,, f.;. ? -@d.. v.;. :.I(i..T 5'N hI ".' '.NI. . :....,.k..n....v.. .. s.. .,,.,j .c
is.4is-.
.a . s . e. ,s. ~ - w; :.... 3, ..a BEDS ?. .... - r-a.,p- .u; x -3,.v..
...-w.r:.
.~ ,...i. ;,8., 3 r ., ;,,s. .,s. ....,,e...g's.....w..- g .;..~ ..u..- .. :.......j.
-:c :.. L '....:.-
....:.s..;..;, . -~ ..'.;t
~.~ ~.

.ys.,.,...
..r....: =, l..vf.:... :3 "w:..m.. :.:.;. ....."s'. sk .~. :
' J J :..'"'".
. v.;.. '... rr. 's. 4 Wc1 r .Mr.. D..Elias .:.:.#-;.,:. J... .h.. ...TO: ~ ^-
SUBJECT:
.Non-Conformance -Reports.
N-Staidwood station
~' L-27eoA _ 3 4 L specification #- 1 l In accordance with Quality Assurance Procedure 915-1, cop es of I NCR #_ 447 _ are being transmitted for review, information and . resolution, if needed. would be R d----- November s. 1984 -Besolution of NCR by .g . appreciated. e ? s . ' ". T&&.& n h /gt . :.s.i.s.s.mana; 4..h.SSuperlatendent'
.a 9" 7

/.p'Br. aidwood Sta. tion I
e..::t t.
.s..
'd. . m_r. v ' ~ ~ ~ ~ s.: ;.. 5.. ' TEQ/ CAR /ajv 40012F) ':p'.T.1 l' - m u ( -..D. Elias cc:
5. R. Mendorf L Sha 11a d,w$f.J.;.' - D K. J. Hansing
) O. A. File 52.1 q ' Contractor. if applicable; _ L. Y. f.esstock ,, 4. , =':.% .s: o .g:. m. . r1.- .,..s.*.- e n ;,j.. 3..t. .. 9, ; ~. -
3. ;,.s e-
.. -... f,, y:,: ?:;..,- . s.,,..
u...,

g"..

j.. ;
a.
. 4
..s<:. ..4... y 9~.. w.-. .-n g . s.. .~.:. : e, . s...,... ,.3 -.'.l....;. ;; :.:*.,. a. s ^ ...a. n, . ~ .' ;....... A c .j 2. .s .v .s . r ~.z.
.?.s *n.
-e ~ '- , A.n. .. L. es . -.r . u - x,.s. ~..;:.v.w. :c a. '...e. h. *;' '.,': %
a
. h .,:,... 3 :a ,.'-). a.,, ?. f.,,'.,..'. , a.,. = .......?~. z;., f *. :.?...*.c.,.p.... = ....n..,,..,.. p.;.-
.u.
. '. ~ - .., ~ y
.1
. l<.,..n~.-. r, r... :Q::%.. p:. <? ~,.. ~ y- ..s.,. .r e . 1. . n...........-.. s.,..;.,e.. %... . ~;i. W. .r. ..:., o. '..~..3.... .;~ 9h: ...s* ..': c......v.:,a..~ GQ'::.. G.s.w*:.5:'.7?.e.t.. ';.t. "W'y.. A :#E. '.W... <.. n.., v. L.., e, 4. ;..,..,,.... x..,. .:".,,. su.. Y.. :. w ..r.,.- .s. g,...y....... .r.. L. a.
T
1. v..

. ;.
.x -. _. .w. '. - .,~r,....., %',*.;'..y[~- M l* W ...s. ... C.;.:.. *. ..,g.. g :., w.giacur g +... 1 ~
n& w..:g;
~ v.n,-
. *.a 'n.r.'. * s;.,
w.,,,
""8'eg,, %,. s 'mEd,Lha.p w.w ..g4 . % y &un$*17eL% $. ... 2...., wi ,,.. z. . w.. m...., 4,~. m. n. = wv
m..._.y s
sis ~ .-:: i :m.:u. nnect uraum ammenggGQ[.g.~g,Q RRRg ( %;.. l G L E ~.^%.lg &..Q...;...g g 6 'u x l J.t.. m ~........ ~~~ ~. 8 .c.i, c. -= y 7A, y. .b A eJ ut, 1-t.uA L, .,j,.4puuo yj,, s.dkq 7. v-cx. n htM Ad x -rw LL.& in.a.m. rit w A qs p n.e & R ( w*kkk G m,ne a -c9A ;- ~; (O. - ..mtal . Alwn'tt L I W' sy w az:: amp =.o
r. =
% J. v ,,,,,,_..,_m.._ c.==== g( 6u._._. a.u " EED %..t. M gee ? a
== umr.e==. X======: =h @8 hhgr M LDIT4Mt
o. w.......s
.oe- =. M .,, a n,...,s k g et. 4sans a e up.s, u W b-y g. WB oa t_, = = - N .AA.N m / A.:t + u &pm .t u t. _ 4. M 4. &.... e' %- ~ 2 m % m_-ev,.7Y f b se N fa i .~ hg
M'. ' (.
e-w~-... I. 3 2,.,, .4 uJup.m b / 5 ammage ca. ..us q.~~g r .o meerascasum a, ~- A m l c..- i ~ ~* -
-g= ~. c - -gm a g e n w., w.. -...v...~.a= y M- -. ; fg.y . ~ = =.-- ^ N 'i- * - e.; , mv;:,.,. ' Teq # f7ar:syP N:..x a.,f-c.. .4.; ~. '9l>3E 3 c.:..... - : a.: 'i.".'.'.i. f 6^ 4.;.,.i.; ; T. yg.,' g e:r......"- 4: a., ,. Q..~...E - Bevisism 8>e .. A r ;. e..f:* y. -.,. - 'c .e c [ . m..... 1_ m.mK4 =rictimer w="="N ,.. yyy.; , $.:a$ (i j. X,- ? z..t . e. ..t.. rt s
=
.i...i ' ~' ~ ,es.ri,e ncy < m.c reeer - > ~um s ? 4 ..- r n u,,,;..a w.s + w.~%. j,,v_...$d.a'.sbu 4 Ik' %W " ^ ? $.,..N.g c ..i. J _.g - s- _...t u b ,notEEREEtUau j gn
3 part 2 WAL13AUW
. ~ - l ~ 2A safety DiiF :t Es this deficiency, Wether or-not safety..related...affu ~ sus no F of the facility.. e 2s sipificance .s.s. $100.000 in resources b.ns no Zs a breakdown in gn Fr w m W ent w ich requires T M/ to re-establish assurance of P N "7 '.I 6 structwas, systese necessary to g ? .Are expenditures of $100,00011ance with approved desip I-, en-p,=imats into comp i necessary to reoatr structures, systems,, e '.Are esponditures og 3100,000 .;,g.g.; r. y - 9,_:g.-...w p' components into camp ,y f m~ wa h,,c=,..e.:,q.: r-l L sg,E y,,,,-Qp;g,,,,,, av u 3-construction yereit? s F i-
m. w w w y.-r,-,
,g,, ,--y,,,,,---enw--,,,,,,--,--w, ,v. -c. g,-,,,-,,,,,,,,,,,% ,m,my, %w--_,_cm,m,ew .i,._ g---
1.1 FOM QF 15-(Rov.10) 11-17 93 4 . f.L.J llMColfMMAllCE Rf.PRT FM CW5TRET10ll Als TEST Station or Site Location MeaN l .1-
m...
ammmmqpmmerw-see we teus ,,,.s.........., s. VA . W.... Stiud .... M1' .te-j L.5 CE M. (0 [E.$ine~a,c=h 5*_.1 I _ h d d I d 7 j 2:. 2. a j e t t g . ca.. c m, a w< N g.. ca. aca a a g: c a a-- tg cm > u c e l u A c o h a t j e t. M fg//f'"'#j.. N /A t.. .e ga 3.m Tit g ' - - - ai M #2h L % AAl~,' #aQ k ~ra) %.,L A. De n . to.itsy & n ab l %' 2]ua 0m & ~ *;- 1% RAT'Y QCb lJo-it-E+ ofM eA" (PA f% w NcR *C W.g g,*5 % N hl. 0.('V h. m M-H _ jolU18A.
~.
~ 2C.G/W hu s pto -mimi... S.m - a- _M==iF .e. m. ue ~ mm. mimi ts. 5 6 'e s. l...N -.:: 0 ? 4 W A(. r.A l.. s 4 4 ~~ 3 ex cm.us.A.AdJL a W. fle,m i.c,w c R-@W o o a m e,. 6 a wa # hv
qg s
v y ,mc,, o.m o sy a u g p,,.m 30 =-... . _-.d.uAA alk;$:(2@,tn *i+W % .a % rn sm:4 o n %n w & on~ J1 da ~%LM W1.1 .iu c2 m aM ERA,u ( k.6 &.~ L... _.. - ........+w.k%wKA nru A las A e =.. .-,W nrrtnrupt fWtV-v u K.cmM. t w u l u A a. u 4 W s. o. i. i 1 r-g - d., @, J W A.. S.. #. "- ".; Z g.'..."~ ~ " ' O r/ ~ l wh 1-L Kc..Au ), mat : J -LL. -*..J,.J.u.de .x e 1 4 u v y ...-...c.........n, L. '....'.. L kc.
r YN' 6J.J.L. hL % d ' Ast k u A LKC= J h f M ldstL :-.> A V e k t h.nu..L.J J aLo n 7th 46Lba.a n
& gt-* A,,. eu&.7 hhm..=.-..-...D ~ %..,,m. i._'LKCoc.~ ~ ha L.SEJ r a l b b l. Pc.B 4 4/K em. <- .........,,.......,s a. a..,a.
-s-a- / Trans. No. K.)nns* nate f A s fc/ SITE CONTRACTOR MCR TRANSMITTAL FORM ~, BRAIDMOOD COMSTRUCTION (Check One) - l To _ D. A. Gallagher x J. R. Reinosky FRON: CRCo Project Construction
SUBJECT:
Contractor l N NCR No. 0 6 M In accordance with Quality Assurance Procedure No. 15-1..Section 5.2. Rev. 10 dated 4/21/83, the attached site contractor NCE.is ' being routed for your review. Please indicate your disposition below and return to CRCo Project Construction (Nord Processing Tryist). ~ Sargent & Lundy, Braidwood office. has reviewed the Recommended Disposition and Approves the Recommended Disposition Approves the Recommended Disposition modified as indicated on the documents listed below Rejects the. Recommended Disposition - installation to l be reworked'to conform with design documents Cannot evaluate the Recommended Disposition The approved or modified disposition has been incorporated in the following Sargent & Lundy documents: Documant No. Reviaien Egg,g %s OM%IDH OF.% =T Q,C. MMOT/M \\ %ow w B+ Gwkso By A Uw Alm-~
Teis Item Ts B+ 6mwo By Cew Aw2 W47
% bTzu n o cej) 1 m ii-r-31 S,,... ,. q g,3ggtEIKd i ._-._._._ _ ~.-,._ __.-. - -- _.. _ _ _.. _ _ _ _ - - -. ~ _. _ - - - -.
72 ~ us v - 3 q e g,M L K. COMSTOC Cs COMPANY, INC. Breld oeg 4.11,i NONCONFORMANCE REPORT 1 ' SYSTEM N/A Sht,,,,1.,. of 2 bah DATE 10/12/ 84 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT NO. INSPECTION CRITERIA: DWG. N/A REV. N/A PEC. L-2790 PROCEDURE: 4.3.3 REV.D 4.3.3.1 REV.C OTHER N/A ITEM (S) DESCRIPTION Preheat of Base Metal LOCATION Various Category I Areas Materials 1 1/2" TIDt DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE: In violation of LKC/QA B.P. 4. 3.3, 4.3.3.1, 1.0.1 paragraph 4.7, and paragraph 4.3, and 10CFR50, App. 8 - criteria IX which states that: " Measures shall be established to assure that special processes, including welding, heat treating, and non-destructive testing, are controlled and j accesplished by qualified personnel using qualified procedures in accordance with applicable codes, standards, specifications, criteria, and other special requirements.", And criteria v which states: " Activities affecting quality shall... (Cont. Page 2)
DATE M-/->#
NUM8ER OF HOLD TAGS APPLIED N/A OC INSPECT + NO [ 10 CFR 21 PROCEDURE 3.1.3 YES A ~ REPORTABLE ITEM CONCURRENCE BY Q.C. MANAGER ~
m. s.si.95 h OTHER RECOMMENBE0 DISPOSITION:
USE.AS.15 REWORK REJECT EXPLAIN JUSTIFICATION: APP web.O Pgtet.apuSE.t WERE. OceM#tEC> a wa. p.au.o. 6 s.. we, was.wa4T, usw minas, wie.r eu.uano TEWts.He.a be5pWT ** steeae wven.caan tu Mram4 GR3mec .sa. wausi,4c. Peac.a m ae.a. anuawnicate,4 W W**** ^%TM8LW L. ,' l Aarend.n TE84* EM.OSA en, AT'iN:. map. TW8M W* tuum, wemt.* Ama to me.w. .Pem.s.ErCADATE 42*265 COMSTOCK PROJ.MGR/ DESIGNEE bA tM EL tanwso W.88 Ace.Ka. 63195 ACTION TO PRECLUDE REPETITION: L,,,tc,. h e m m uaAR K ClWpmas M MT- .gg How (.*.4EHERAtS& VJa u:MHC. \\Me.TN-ettare Est.mena. (,W.L.IP.Q IMOne.ATV4C., / wwas ena.-uaAr w samoismo ano we.13,.esaswes. maa. mas.cn As 58.55W res-aty e.4.. % e w > puis s T s. y gQ@MSTOCK PROJECT MANAGER (OR DESIGNEE)h h ' 3. GL DATE 4 2%.B@ L k C '4 CLIENTCONCURRENCEWITH DISPOSITION:( OMMENTS) hC h Co.uueu t h*d5 DI "";ThDhT-'. YtD IcAM7' CM QS$aAkeusI245 .O.0.94 / 6/A s < u LLL s-lules-CECO QA Sy. DMf CECO FIELD ENG. DATE epROJECT SusT. DATE CAD Derrnenmr r,ir un nssiLnLng go, ag ' aiv.,o m now asa. ,amano m aavio navino 14 ROM AJT IFD PROCEDURE 5/18/79 03/01/84
aAsecT TL.a. consteen a courAmy,mc. e.. tJc.2 b}Ab Page 2 of 2 + ...be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, or a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings. Instructicas, procedures, or drawings shall include appropriate quantitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactor-ily accomplished.", various welskments to structural steel members greater than 1 " in thickness may have been welded without the requ' ired, pre-heat or without docented traceability that such pre-heat was performed within the instruction criteria outlined above in category I areas, prior to 12-5-83 (Date of WIR issuance). 1 e L i f e i FORREFERENCECV I l l l e QAS I l
O.Samcem wts. '~ K 2.\\ GO = - _ - _ C . cie4c., = epeona.TS._Arvncans:3__xum.__btsa.6 _Tww.ar.aut. W S.__ Ate _.itz. ama._ swap,.TwE.aras.k. M %. e n.
T w.J E., _.
..._ __ _ W 8bt _c*^'% _#io TWE.w6 _Ilta.Atw.wsp __064% _. __._._.PtoPaa. m sar_cn4._5we._stum_L. ___.. t ?.n *. v \\"_. 9 5 (..... C=- % ' te, < = reem n. N -m te ~_%v c. . o _3 0 5 2. MSSI.lpw) _ a h 3.sw.4z4. _ o SSSE ___ c s.s 2._ ..a 41% _c.. Aat, __ c.s se. ._e m.m.szu ._C. 5o5 5..._ t4o.S(, _Hi 24. m.. 42G _ 146t'assA._ o W4 _.m.d zG. _. R 1.5(a _Hi24_si.,3Et,. Q:.SSS4 Tbb-D _ 4 4. G.._ s. A E ta._ _. _p.u5cVa1.
tWSc, P{G._.s43.'#S_
tEWo6EA- _6.i.la, _.m.._42c., __ Tb5 -12. .._sub. _ sw. 4ae _... '.o.iSS32. .We'MJ.__ . PA n _.v.L. sot. Tea _S._-_. _.6 4 LT.__sL. 4.2f. _. 14615246_._ __b M t.. 4E Ge __ 1E.W14EA _ 1.1. Z4 M 6_ _ _Si G.. _.55. 44(, 6 \\4 6 o.\\5 A _ . _ _. _ = wv-so4_ i 6 5_ 01SSf,3 .Unta5r,4 __m 124.___as.,359 wv - tz .ca3.ig_s.s._fe.1_ wv-ts I 1._ Sam 1 uu n >6.131._ss...soi c.st.:3.-> o.a.1% o.A T eu.D _o.1%3A 2db%4A__a
tw AAct my.J!o_
U 20Sc65A_.h i 1% - e i dot _ l.S.54\\ VM Ico.__ _ Mi3.1 Ew._9_S __ 4 _y?3. fa
Lt3_twMt_
t Aw_w k _._M.L33 c m*L_. 45-4 s!n =tsoL_ 'i'. '45c.,3 W4w%__.1^.i.2a.%._s __45.3__ (-tr 4
i 11 mMu_.
uc.wnw., ._E.1 as.s_._m.. A53 _
I -2. ESSO *UI 't.%STh. c. ~~ p fitisburgh ya,,so, s.n., Testing Rev. 2 ~'-c-- Laboratory *-**
~~.:"
"^' Re gior t No: M k /O - 7/ / 8Sb 94/N Leh No. REF0MT of l Hiscellaneous Weldinu Qualification Report Date: J 86 Job No CH-3175 Commonwealth Edison Company Client Braidwood Nuclear Power Station Project Centractor: L. K. Comstock C:ntractor Supplied Information: Welding Procedura Type of Qualification .I-Position Qualified /f - FL AT v' n! alder's Name M. 7)/AJ s C L i 8 [J g f Walder I.D. b//7A N p[d h Welding Process l. W" Manual or Machine NAJJUAl Material Specification M-68b e Y W6 Dl.l-l976 s, Standard APFi O-4-gg Data of Qualification: OACC 1 NA 7 s. t sr. Visual Inspection: )[g'f f Bend / Fracture ACC J /A ~ DATE Macroetch Test C REJ N/A Tost Results: forming Non-Conforming Not Applicable Visual inspection of weld area only. Remarks: g>rr44. M 0. W. THOMAS Inspector / Level: Supervisor /Datc; M pi e M M /f }//-g[ ~ RENEWED BY NA!b [ B. L SCREDITH ' N/W DATE ................... ~....,. ~.........,.........
u a[I f r t ov a i w rs as 6 v.ar.ue. s.. 2.ECE-PQR-076 IP/ELDING PRCCIDURE QUALIFl:ATION TEST RECORD PROCEDURE SPECIFICATION GROOVE WELD TEXT ASSULT3 Aedmond sesmen teamen ses Masarisiseemiliassen A588 Tensas swamyth.sair IMAI Websg speans g N/A Manuel er meshste Manual N/A p,,,,,g,,,g,,, IF-Flat FBur sesmisessifisseen A5.1 g w isse pimermens aussisiasmen E7018 Rest Fase Wees snous pues N/A N/A 1 8/A g Sheqhhng ps N/A pg,, N/A N/A N/A Singie er musim6e som single / Multiple Sinpa er seuinste art single Amiir.ysohns.Ur rasonic laaminatior N/A -.m-- W~.- A N/A Masrestan Masresteh AdC. S Id6 MO O w,ig,,.,,,, M. Dinelli #62 1 1 ,h , A:a. FORINF000N.0NI.Y m=3ffi,
WILDING FROCEDURE l
Pan
has, asons el an, seus m
y,,, seues SINCLE PAHS p y 1 1/8" 130 24 N/A Meu IrtE :> Ass av i i 1 3/32" 95 - 100 26 - 30 N/A 3" 2 3/32" 90 - 100 24 - 26 N/A g 3 3/32" 90 - 100 24 - 26 N/A l >~ l
Single,- 1/8" Fillet l
Multiple - 3/16" Fillet } We the immersped, surdfy tnat ins sutements in this recorti are correct and that the test mids wees orsoered. mines ans tusind in accornance witn tne reovremams of 58 of AW3 D1.1. Structural Weidme Coos.
Base Metal Temp.
56 7 contractor 0 f A1999 Due Date: 6-17-85
/A d -
waad W
-9-84~
Den i l eussanzo a novco navisto T TLg o ng. cart navistcre PRCOEDURE l oAsa
~ . ~. L. weg, L ej, r.g f ta ?'c%.- ror. No.: m.-Q-i p Pif fsburgh Testing ucv. 2 ~ -=~=--- ll.:. '.: '"' * ' ' Labora tary '-* Report No: Mk/O /7/e'2. REPOMT Lab Ho.
3S*T~- 9490 of Miscellaneous Welding Qualification Report Date:
,;2 8 6 Job No CH-3175 Client Conunonwealth Edison Company Braidwood Nuclear Pot.er Station Project Contractor: 1.. K. Coastock C ntractor Supplied Information: Type of Qualification Welding Procedura Position Qualified M h - 4/dPIFDA/TA L Welder's Name M. D/Ll6LL / N b2 Walder I.D. Welding Process 6 /Y) A N Manual or Machine MAA//ld m e*f Material Specification A.TS$ enD kee Standard k\\A / n DI. I - l 9 #"/.[ gg i "b ' '\\ Date of Qualification: M 8 5~ ./ r --- a \\ N Visual Inspection: ACC RIJ A Bend / Fracture ACC J I A gg f~ "M Macroetch Test C RIJ N/A Test Results: forming Non-Conforming Not Applicable Visual inspection of veld area only. Remarks: [/ fr/M / 77-- C.W. THOMAS Inspeet or / Level : Supervisot/Uatet $ k LA J J .) - Y~ 5$ RU!MN l7lg/h ( g. L s.Ei n i " 2.).; /S 5
cAsr27-L. K. ContSTOCK (5 COMPANY. INC. 1.ECE-PQR-077 WELDING PRO *.EDURE QUALIFICATION TEST RECORD PROCEDunt IPECIFICATION GROOVE WELD TEXT RESULT 3 Roh seamen test Mennet h M TeneBe sweegth, sek SMAW Weedsig erseen g/g """"*',anoat gjg Manuel er smaahans w.mert Peshun o6 % FWeer sneet esselhassen M1 GeiesINesedtest Filter nuesel ensenitseenen E70la Rest Fees N/A M/A N/A g IlfelesusutFees g M/R Pleur N/A gfg yfg Shsgiubng gas Sinele/Multipie Single er emulusie sees N/A sinole Aedsegreshes Unresonas Esenenatio, Elagteer aiuteses ers Fillet test seeulu Min Size Mutuste Pass Mas Slas Single Pass Meeresult Maarertest N/A MC Passnest wasonant NO 1 CC. 't C 1 Welter's assie M. Dine 111 #62 1 l. , Acc , Aes F0 4 INFORM!!.TANjgY W%gkg/ -7/e'l pen mess. fases se
D'"a i
se. aus m m o es 4 1" l SINGZE PAS B 1 1/8" 120 - 130 20 - 22 N/A MULTJ PI.E P LSS 1 3/32" 90 - 100 22 - 24 N/A
V 2
3/32" 90 - 100 22 - 24 N/A 3 3/32" 90 - 100 22 - 24 N/A 3.' Multiple - j
Single - 1/8" Fillet 3/16" Fillet We the unsersigned, eenify tnat tne statements in this record are sorrect and that the test welds wete aremered.
wetoes ano tested in accoraance witn tne reouirements of 55 of AW3 Dt.1. Structural Welding Caos, I h&anuts:Turir or Contrsator o " Base Metal Temp. 56 T A1999 Due Date: 6-17-85 Autnensed try -e gna PRBIEE Bi1Y ....,, w -? .n...... ......o ~ PROCEDURE oas4 l.____,_.___.__.____________,.______.__.__
,..g,,.-... L 2.h5.O. 2.'l. 't..)I 5 ?n.n ~ i lp Pittsburgin yar,no., m:n., 7estittg kev. 2 o n = =.c a = = l'..* ': " * *
Laboratary **** 7/3 Repurt No: M u /O-kEF0MT Lab No.

EDT-9A/9 /
of Hiscellaneous Welding Qualification Report Date: M-N-9I Job No CH-M Conssonwealth Edison Company Cliont Braidwood Nuclear Power Station Project Contractor: L. K. Coastock C2ntractor Supplied Information: Type of Qualification Welding Procedure Position QJalified 3 F - VERTicA L 1/ elder's Name 8, RANLIAJS M 9 #7 Welder I.D. bdAN Welding Process Manual or Machine MA AJ/JA L Material Specification M.T 8 6 l N h / S D I l - / 9 #7 I [ ', j *.,m a\\-r. Standard /, -. ; :, Dato of QJalification:' O-4/- 2T Visual Inspection: ACC RIJ A d Bend / Fracture ACC J 1 A \\. // , / l Macroetch Test CC REJ N/A l Test Results: nforming Non-Conforming A ( 'g g Visual inspection of weld area only. Remarks: mas /7 C. W. THOMAS Inspertor/ Level: Supervinor /Dat COL /2N/A / M/-/- [Y J-j'~ N 'Y fE. L MrMDITH REVIEWED BY I h "' <- DATE S. e w.ese erf.e, e er.e, ese...see. $.e.. O e $ e....e 9 l L
~ QAIt:T L. K.COMSTOCK 8: COMPANY. INC. c IJECE-PQR-078 WELDING PROCEDURE QUALIFICATION TEST RECORD ~ PROCEDURE SPECIPICATION GACOVE WILD TE37 RESULT 3 Reduessenessen wemen nest ggg Mennst M essmen Tensas swangth,mais N/A M "8 8 " 8 { Mamal ,jA Maasst ermeshone 3F-Vertical l poussa es wetemg Plher meialsessifissuen AS.1 Gassed hend wat /~ Puser snessi seassifsamen E701a gg p,,, l W/1 1 N/A 1 N/A M snentgraee N/A 76est N/A N/A N/A Shogidag gas 9 4 sinale / Multiple Single er muisses sees 3/A s4neta Mh Ezanianatir l f Simple ermuinole are _mg._ _ .eg _.n _e j N/A ,/'f[d pasywet resunent O O* 8 1 B. Rawlina 597 1 1 Weider's nune , #co , &c 20RINFORMAT10N ONLY ssfhS? JZ-N-f6 's .wtLDwoenoCaDuns. I Peo ama. asums of me, same m ve,. seses g. .- bl SINGLE PASO n 1 1/8" 130 - 140 20 - 22 N/A N MULTIPLE PJSS 6" x 12" N x 3" \\ 1 3/32" 90 22 N/A N 2 3/32" 90 22 N/A k 3 3/32" 90 22 N/A \\ e
single - 1/8" Fillet Multiple - 3/16" Fillet
? We the unservipned, eartihr inst tne statemems in this record art eerrect and met the test welds wets erecered, wetoed and tasted in accorcance witn tna teovirements of 58 of AW3 D1.1.Structuralwetoms Caos. C
Base Metal Temp.
57 F A1999 Due Date: 6-17-85 m by Dets F09 Krronmr r v sessanco a..nov r.o naviagg =i suans airsse.EE U b T ; n tl uvm,civ j PROCEDURE oase e.. p
'=
1 *2 5.r.) 2.'j. 't.5 ~ Fittaburgh r,,,,,,, m:n., I E Test'ing sev. 2 on-*-==== La bora tory *-'-*A-?l4-l . 22 '.: ' ' Fvpurt No: M k] 837~- 9M9.7 kEPOM1 Lab No. of His.ce11=ncous Welding Quali ficat ion Report Date: 2-4-1-86 Job No CH-31 M Consonwealth Edison Company Client Braidwood Nuclear Power Station Project C:ntractor: L. K. Coastock C ntractor Supplied Information: c Type of Qualification Welding Procedura Position Qaalified 4 F - Ot/ERNEAD Welder's Name
8. kMk/L/A/%
M 97 Walder.I.D. S #7 A k/ Welding Process Ad#dll AL Manual or Machine __ Material Specification A .59A Standard MNS Dl, I-l97T Date of Qaalification: 2-4-M APPROYE6] Visual Inspection: OACC ORzJ 2/A QeT'e..;j Bend /Tracture ACC J /A D8.T! ) Hacroetch Test CC REJ N/A Tost Results: forming Non-Conforming Not Applicable Visual inspection of veld area only. R;m:rks 0>> raw M C. W. THOMAS Inspector / Level: A Supervisor /Dat cd2M/,f /MN I J-85-REV!?WED BY M ( a t. ecctf/ i.,,.., 2. hsk
- -~ CAII:T . + - L. K.COttSTOCX is COMPANY. INC. IJtcE-Pga-079 WELDING PR00tDURE QUALIFICATION TIET RECORD rnocEnung' rge:FICATIOtl OnOOVE WELD TEST RESULTS E h tonese test Meenrielseesthemsen ASSS w ,,i, 838A38 N/A WeMaserasess g M/A Meeust er meshme A7. Owe A an A Passess elweiess pgust sueest esselhessen AS.1 Gassed.insed test E701e Aces Fees pliner eastelmassifiessen f/g M/1 y/1 g Wete sesset preme g id W/1 Pleur M/1 N/A N/A StsY eggis Sincia /Mult inia Sisigle er andente ass N/A 84 "la Redsgremius41swesenseE - f_6 Sageser andente are W 8 Waldag essnan FWainn resutu 88"E8'*8'"'N'" f. Min Ese Multsale Pass Men $1se Single Pass ' = Prahast ammeurosure M Messeun O O 9 0 1 6 B. Rawlins #97 i es,s, , Ret
Ace v
J2 )
E""'"
Den too. smens of gw es. eine Assures wese ensul SINGLF. FAS; i 1 1/8" 120 - 130 20 - 22 N/A M21,TIPLE F) JiS 1 3/32" 90 - 100 20 - 22 N/A 2 3/32" 90 - 100 20 - 22 N/A
N
^ 3 3/32" 90 - 100 20 - 22 N/A p 1"
Single - 1/8" Fillet Multiple - 3/16" Fillet We ine woorsynod, earttty trat ine seismerns in this reened are correst erus thet the inst welds was aressred.
wenses one tesud in assersanos wnn ine reevermerns of 55 et AWS D1.1 Strussural Weidung Coos. " '*"'"'E* " " Base Metal Temp. 56 4 A1999 Due Dates 6-17-85 Ausnortmed W FOR REFEREEE C~? .es..ew ....e v o uvue mu - - ' o = = =^n ^= Pa pnecanuna ' t j . i.!yp....-iQf.1@.,'Qi_,q:.i.ig.y. esse _. J
u J (- 7 Date Anril 30. 1985 BRD# 15.829 TO: J. D. Deress
SUBJECT:
Non-C.onformance Reports - Braidwood Station In'accordance with Quality Assurance Procedure #15-1, Section 5.4 a copy of NCR # 667 is being transmitted. The corrective action indicated has been implemented and the NCR l-should be considered closed. cWAICA da N T. E.- Qifaka ~ O. E' Superintendent Braidwood Station TEQ/CAII/mjv (0009F) cc: W. C. Cleff D. L. Shamblin W. E. Vahle, B. Kulik/ letter only K. A. Both N. Kaushal (BCAP NCRs Only) Q. A. File /52.1 Contractor, if applicable L. K. Comstock l l l 1 LOUh,y,,gon ONLY" L. R g g p g g{, (... 4
.. a 10
= l -r.c.,,..,m y__,-_ .--~,..-m,-._mm_..___.. . ~, -.__.,___-.,.,,__.,.,_.__.,.,_,..,,.,,-.,___..m--,___.,r,._,-...-_
33,3 c-( -w DATE March 26. 1985 BRD # 15.357 To: pr. D. L. Shamblin
SUBJECT:
Non-Conformance Reports Braidwood Station In accordance with Quality Assurance Procedure #15-1 NCR # 667 is being transmitted for completion of final disposition. ala,ler T. E. Qua W Q. A. Superintendent Braidwood Station TEQ/CAH/mjv (0013F) cc: Q. A. File /52.1 K. A. Both l l FOR REFEREWCE CCI i _,,,,'? n ~ "...% m 3 ' ' VE@@:W@] I( APR 8 685 !! l i. ib
msstma
+ l .. ~.. - _ _.. _
= l l DATE October 17, 1984 BRD9 13.416 TO: Mr. D. Elias
SUBJECT:
Non-Conformance Reports Braidwood Station S & L Specification # L-2790A In accordance with Quality Assurance Procedure #15-1, copies of NCR # 667 are being transmitted for review, information and j resolution, if needed. Resolution of NCR by November 8, 1984 would be appreciated. I I A l l ioh, lev T. E. Quaka Q. A. Superintendent Braidwood Station s l TEQ/CAH/mjv (0012F) cc: D. Elias E. R. Wendorf W. C. Cleff D. L. Shamblin K. J. Hansing O. A. File 52.1 Contractor, if applicable L. K. Comstock EOR ;E?ERE E E
Mti
{ f 11-17-83 FORM QP 1 1.1 g, NONCONFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND TIST ics.. M station or site Location Fad d I
o. A c--== tea.
,,,,si.......... ,,:,s........... ...<-....-..........M vm w a.s m.s M MYL A. a utb l-J2 Ik O0t ~ a -. w.o.a [ a,....-. enci a ow w a.acu... O s.=u. a co.a cio. Q. t3K =c.<>.co <a a jsll1':o-uuci .u. . c no
o..<
Q ..a a..a.u. a ....a u .o= ui a The r ~dvA cAudr Lt..uAku d"'" ' Wm om N lA at N L,u A A b M i~,% h Q b.v Ahe u M-l B :tku(k 6meu.# ,v,,ge,, no 2._.,L A (3r n /e,.//.c.y c/ck,.# ( M. 6a%.-NcR=c4M y,.;<, *MLOh QCb .lo-/t-Ff- .. ::. f%Xf' (4.'G. ('()k m n-N iohilE. ? C.Geh em,w pco to.. voaA Limitaticas, vou can Paoctas C wou CANI.OT reocuD LIM 17&T!oM mur..o= u.it no, tnmi.i %ew rn.rm.e~ ..e. t wat i.t e son. - e us 6.us.,,,,n.- LK b h 4 A.'d A. L,6Jl w_ th.O.a],d """.~ '. O E , l. C.n.W.8 <0.eca.e..<g .a-e ~~ was h%z wn; e v v ~ .c... .... s,. - a % vA h 1ke o u r s u & u d A s t m A n. n s
* " ~ " ' ' ' " " "
m L2 Ik ' Uh 4/ M m,oJ % &
=.
... a E SA4 f i l e-c e h t. w A d. h k e u ) c....m............... v ,,L K C~tt -Qt M l a w. a t t,n A A ti:., w.f m d f. m. e h l o l .m.v.duA La AKfR. D. l. I
g...
.r.. ..................., '. ~.. 2 - W -s1,,,,,,,,,, d n a n +. .r&As-Q.2 t'. (f.r,ts u A."..,. m z ..a.. ~ L K C-.}vh _ &&UA -LL'r era.uiuA >At tw1Aa~. u ....... ;,m u F l W H..H..v.il..M.H..'.b E.W..1 V. L k c. ' 4 U.dd' -. @_hh IA " de,t Es.4 mod >d.LkC b /-.. i L L L. >.a.L L.La-t.a mauA J Le n ' n A f d MOCD L t tb,..%,... G.-... '. L KC Oc. ~ud 41-E,, 4,...~....re. Ado.u % HolbpM o -. ~.. 'ru3re A A Pc.D 4l4leT E A L. L. L..%IITW;'% g -.m-. y n, a , n,.., n. n. - -, w -- ., so c-..c u..,-.. 7 y" ; a4 g/gv,,. -~r..a f~ a <. a <. ..o
o..
u. .a. U
.b fYf '. l~ '.k ~ .*E ' Gp; SARGEFF& LMTmr ~" . Qpg::7-(% ba*t 3',s E ...NGINEERS FE8 06 liti / POWNOED 8898 g
['
SS EsST 840NRO E STR EE7 CNICASO, ll.UNOIS 60003 %g.Q;g. eOS o.smence o a,,,,,,,,,,,. ,.4. t y.. s..seeeemse Twx........., -[. ". ?@A.g.,. jig'! 'p.lW,a. 'q February 1, 1985 a Project Nos. 4683-00 4684-00 vA, ': Commenwealth Edison Company Braidwood Station - Units 1 & 2
4. p' 4 N
d!. V2 Ele.... . 2
S'i ;M -
ctrical Installation Work ' ' +. ..cg;;i.9S&LSpecificationL-2790 - - ~ ~ ~ - - ' ~ ~ S e g*
" - ~ ~ ~
CECO.P.. O. No... 231360 ~.~ " M " ' " " Y, .d ~ "Non-Conformance Report - NCR L-667 . ~... Mr. W. E. Vahle 2 i? ~ ' ~ ~ "(# Project Field Engineer- - Commonwealth Edison Company Braidwood Station q.3,. - P. O. Box 81 i T' Braceville, Illinois 60407 N.{.I.... Dear Mr. Tahle t '-- -"-- - - " ~ ~ ' ~ ~ - '" ~ ~ 'E ~~ ~ We acknowledge receipt of Non-Conformance Report (NCR) L-667, dated October 11, 1984 (copy enclosed), with Mr. D. Eliks' letter dated October 26, 1984, covering the,non-conformance described belows -- .. r *. t The required preheat for welding, attachments. t;o b.uj.1 ding.. steel in excess of l'1/2"'thickne.ss was not obtained. c: - * ~ ~ We.have reviewed this'-Non-Conformanct~ Rep 5tt"and 'dondur~'t'haE "the ' ~. * ? /* corrective action 4 (Requalify the appro parameters that occurred in' 'ths field;gr,iate. eld.. proc.edures using the.:- w I.e., no preheat maximum material thickness) However, L. K. Comstock should be required to requalify each specif d recommeD ed.p. ruler Section 16 is acceptable. ~~ ~~' weld procedure that was violated. 'All weld qualifications should be done on material thicknesses that are equal to, or greater,.than, the Iy6li,"a'p'p'Tve NCR L-667i howeverthickness of the thicker part joined. r v. 5 ~ ~2 all futtfre e g sH631d be l'perf ormed in 'acdoldancI~w~itih th.T. - pie ~Eei. t.'.~ric'giiifdisens[ ~ s a.a.- .b e ~~ ~f0R REFERENCE DiU. ~ .... -.~.n.:l.. ; .:.r. .., w q g 3 ..... ~
.': i ' 9::,,:..... h... ..v'..li-s. 1.Q N@%M M.j.tC - N, @ =4AC.W M NN# % M... .,hnxh,,p$El,@#.fd.W.Y.U.;Mk.11%'MMM$dli.sfMS$: 97p.9$h@.3W .v
n
.;. ~ s. .Y sy/f j$e'pst cM 5 gur. w:
z. vahl.... f. j..g,).c. 7g re b
r omanonwealth Edison Company.'$.yp,';g[.M...!g,:n.$re' rua'(1lEpy 1985 h ND*I ......$,.S. k. 5 4.. ?..MW#. f.Page 2 W,8? 2.s.... z 4 .ax.s.,. v.c. ...n.9.. .c p.m:.. m..:.,.w u.e.. ~ '..M I.N*.W'I.Url.E .. U h.. '.?A.I.w :.Yh,74.ky'dkhE.M.h.[,i.%,Qf.,. . h.
v... n r:
it .[,,. I C gd,.pM.t - f
ay 9 = tioa= on: pa abga, Please advise.Sl.?:3f y ".h*
& TSW%@ /A ;gli N. M.. "... e,.....i M.$./Q.DT ww#l{?urs .*c. a.;j;. : ?.. %.t@ k.c,.d'.$$.4%$M$y!W.,...%. 4.y. j.<.g.:.
.c.,. ;,
jWEG.?..'J $$l{f% ~ ry truly,M %.1 y,y s Nc., / hifNNM...!.b....N.:..iN.,M:. , k. Gk 0?d'Yh.h.NhY N,....M., t,....h... ..'.1 NNt p.m,p.,i W.e. Project Enginsersenior'z b. y , ). Y'>!
f. n u t
.:Ms. '. ' vh
i O b M.9'+
V, .T.:.. :.V znclosure e ; N v~ ~< M.%: @, Cop ..',.. : hf, '4[r,;,; /,, ,{'. y,h}':$[$/,'!j, ,]. s 0 @ M.* k.' } & "* ** * * * * ' :. & % ? h d W &. V W W @ M M & : S..,W...i.WM. R. Camba. '.,1;>. W.. ' 1 ; b W' .br h;. i.N..,.VWl?.'j'1.. 9. :1.,5 % . i;... %... >..,. '^ l'.si:;f't.&MA,\\v..i. . s. :.., ,. D. A. Gallagher Jc 5..<:...
d

pQ,.
_ hY bhhh.S..h.s..h.r.)G;.. ,Y.. ..:..,f;..i. r.u.,h 'd, hb.bb'NN../'h. k'h.n...b c g..p. " c..,:, f, *,... g . j.3 , '. l ",.;.,. r., M....q tj,, [.4,, '.t!}3... n&;g.. q:.;. 1 hh,.,4.Kosik. hhhf.N:kd9",*t. . ;.),y e +,.:g' ll, -i.,$. ^ I: m. m., ...... m# y s. .......1 k '[... . a'f. '4 N. lj'.. /E h b%' k*.*-h f....l.,.:.t ? s i. ,h ' b; 6, I. .T.,,.i..*,.,., t . '., p. l ' -)k( s, ' '. '.; ; ';; *: J *.,
u. 'l.. X s.
i:
3.. c.
. ; :,:,w,.p.:; ' Mf; :',. * ;. '. ' ".l3l';,. ;,,, 7.;,d,....s4 % .,A.' ?- s, ' ' ' g..:. . e?:'i s ':. %.s.; M.....D. %..., 2.,. R, ;.'I.D,,l.-
'! r.
,. t.,. .. i., p.,.h :4. A4",,.r.. If f.Rr,.I,'d. '! D. '. JJ...'i.f.' k.,'.i.'l'i. !M . t ' <: 4..
e. f.,
o ..f.. ..o 9 ,. 8 <a
. : 3.,
f .%..t.e..e }Y ! p r...s.t....%Mhu.ia%1 w*.'4%..> geA AMM4&. '. 4 '.e *.*9. ty;.'. f 4.,rg.N $M
h. r -
\\ .. A,. p kh r. " % / s "" :. .*f ... 6 b.'. ..b l b 9.My' $%M$..@a%:#"WWW .WhAW @.t .g x ? =: b ~. Qyqu q ,: m:; c::n..g :.
g.:. g w y l
m., s .~.w w:.s..::~6 .~.~.u... w wi.m.,p.m ~ . * 'i.. '[1. * " 8 ';'. l *. -......p. t y; )..,.o .e , 4.',j?..* [$ ! 4.,' ;,{.. .b k'. I f.) *.'.' 4 3, ,b,* 1 M.. u. qw.uW.;. y:&,.....P. ... *m,... ; ,u.,.... r. : w. w w w....,~,..uy....;2.,;, 4,:e,9 2;.d.. M % M .3.ya. www.w MvM i ,. h. t .v):,..
c. c,.. < :.
..n. s.#g/ *.... i ; ,,:*,,.....;,.,,/,,....., ..;, i;. . g.,,,..,,.., ..-*w' l** l, ..,.,,. gs %. t 4 r*'*#.' .i*.. '4 t:, [ .. s. t ug.,. q t. e *,,s,.,..'.. L.y:*.,
M
.i..-
,. c.n.
. ~ . #,Q.h4 6.4.' le' 'Itt e 4Nd*g*.U.f b)'*,.6NM4 hs'" N d .% 8 y g' # I Y h s .l N.* 6 ?N. h ,.,0.-[,=gt,,,..,, o . s.. ., ic.a. ,,. y
2 of 3 g h 80-23 Revision 0 12-22-82 CONSTRUCTION DEFICIENCY EVALUATION i Part 1 DESCRIPTION Describe.The Deficiency (Attach references) T h h tt,l d a L J b.m C M cftm a.* J.h O}A YD .uM g v 4 A t L s wsu s u me s ne s t h g g w a,, Uggg g Part 2 EVALUATION l', 2A safety Impact YES NO l r j Does this deficiency, whether or not safety related, affect safe operation of the facility. f l e 25 significance t l 'YES NO ~ Is a breakdown in QA Program apparent which requires $100,000 in resources to re-establish assurance of program? l ' Are expenditures of $100,000 necessary to rework structures, systems, l I components into compliance with approved design? Are expenditures of $100,000 necessary to repair structures, systems, components into compliance with approved design? Is approved final design inadequate to assure compliance with SAR and \\ construction permit?
,5 Ch 3 g
g' 30-23 . Revision 0 ' 22-82 YES MO / During Installation / Testing is it apparent that a structure, system, component supplied by others can not meet the required performance s specifications and should be reported (10CFR21) other users? (i.e. Potential Industry Deficiency) Does Inadequate Management review / corrective a'ction exist which ignores significant adverse trends?, Do pre-operational or start-up test results determine a system that does not meet safety analysis report or technical specification requirements? Part 3 REPORTABILITY OF 50.5Se NOTIFICATION If the answer to Part 2A is Yes and any answer in Part 25 is Yes, this deficiency shall be reported to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III Headquarters. / Items not reportable s Items reported to date NRC Region III kaluah' Reported by"7~lO L date 10 - II* M N Commonwealth Edison e t 0355a \\$ 44A f 9 ,--,-- - - -, - - - - - - - - - - - -}}

ML20214F013

Contents

Text

SUBJECT:

c

Subject:

SUBJECT:

=~ /

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

=

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

Navigation menu

ML20214F013

Text

SUBJECT:

c

Subject:

SUBJECT:

=~ /

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

=

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

Navigation menu

Search