ML20214E476
| ML20214E476 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 05/07/1986 |
| From: | Swartz E COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| References | |
| 0443D, 443D, 84-01, 84-1, OL-I-ROREM-006, OL-I-ROREM-6, NUDOCS 8705220102 | |
| Download: ML20214E476 (4) | |
Text
t f 2 /Y) "
Commo n'-
lith Edison e,* Braicwcoa,
lear Power Sta::en Route et,6... da Bracevdfe. Ilhnors 6C407 4g Teleonone 815/458 2801
'87 f5 22 P6 :48 March 2.* 1984 j
O q
Mr. James G. Keppler, I(
f
'Q Regional Administrator - Region III a 01 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comunission 3.% g { a r rf ::I W
799 Roosevelt Road
@3
' d al E 3
Glen Ellyn. IL 60137 gglQ h
l!
I 4
i
SUBJECT:
Braidwood Station Units 1 and 2 10 CFR 50.55(e) 30 Day Report L. K. Comstock. Documentation Review d
l hj,g NRC Docket Nos. 50-456/457 Ad li {
h#3
Dear Mr. Keppler:
on January 31, 1984, the Ccamonwealth Edison company project Construction Department notified Mr. R. C. Knop of a potential deficiency reportable pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55(e) regarding the t.. K. Cemstock.
Document Review.
For tracking purposes, this deficiency was assigned Number 84-01.
This letter fulfills the thirty (30) day reporting requirements of 10 CFR 50.55(t) regarding this matter and is considered to be an interim report.
Description of Deficienev As early as March.1982. Comalth Edison Ccapany Quality Assurance audits and the Technical Support Evaluation of September, 1982, identified deficiencies indicating the need to improve the t..
K. Comstock doctmentation/ filing system.
As a result of identified deficiencies ccanonwealth Edison Ccepany felt that improvements could be made in the areas of:
1.
Timeliness of records retrievability.
070D220102 Ob0507 A001GCQl PDH ADOCK 03000456 O
PDn 3., a,
. 2.
Better accountability of the production records which support the status of installation.
i 3.
Reconciliation of the use of previously used outdated forms.
In October. 1982.*it was determined that progress was poor in the document review. In Novenner of 1982 the L. K. Comstock Quality control Manager was replaced because he lacked administrative abilities. However, poor progress in the document review continued. In March. 1983. Project construction Department held a meeting with L. K. Coastock's Regional Vice President and in April, 1983 with L. K. Constock's Executive Vice President. Corporate Quality Assurance Manager and Regional Vice President to discuss the poor progress being made on the document revi,ew. As a result. L. K.
Coastock committed to provide four (4) inspectors to complete the document review and provide a plan for completion.
The plan to complete the review was submitted to Comunonwealth Edison Company for concurrence on March 9. 1983. The plan's scope and depth was to reconcile audit deficiencies of document retrievability, as well as assuring record completeness and correctness.
In June. 1983. Project Construction Department and Quality Assurance met with L. K. Comstock to discuss the status of the dccument review. It was determined that L. K. Comstock was not proceeding as scheduled to meet their September, 1983. completion date. As a result of the June meeting. Commonwealth Edison Company again replaced the L. K. Comstock Quality Control Manager, with intent to more adequately organize and complete the document review as projected for February 1, 1984.
The corrective measures which provide Laprovements to the L. K.
Comstock document system were presented to the WRC (Messrs. Little, Williams and Love) on November 3,1983 and the program was mentioned on December 20, 1983 during the Inforcement conference.
J To date L. K. Comstock is 100% complete with their review of all documents on file.
Any significant deficiencies requiring extensive rework will be reported La the final report. Also any large backlog of inspections to be performed to assure the completeness of the Quality Control record for installed items will be reported as identified.
A00150 o1 t
l
ANALYSIS CF SAFETt IMPLICATICWS This deficiency does not affect the safe operation of the plant. It is the our intent to assure that all safety related ir.sta11ations i
have a complete and credible record of installation and Quality j
control acceptance prior,to systems turnover to operatien.
ConRECTIVE ACTION TO PREVENT RECURRENCE project Construction has authorized the use of a computerized doctseent tracking system. This system will be used to document the status of installation and inspections.
i To prevent incomplete or unacceptable documents from being filed. L.
K. Coastocit has provided for a three (3) level review. Lead j
Inspectors are responsible for reviewing all documents initiated in 4
their areas of responsibility. The supervisor of Inspectors provides a second level management review. It's his responsibility i
to determine whether additional direction / clarification is needed to J
be given to inspectors who continue to improperly fill out reports.
Finally all documents are reviewed by Document Control before they are filed.
DATE CF CCMPLETION 1
Reconciliation of the inspection records is expected to be completed on May 1,1944, when a final report will be issued.
1 please address any additional questions concerning this matter to this office.
Very truly yours, tz E. Douglas swart:
Nuclear Licensing Administrator cc RI!! Inspector - Braidwood Director of Inspection and Enforcement (04434)
l SY/BW MARCH 12, 1994 To:
C. Reed / N.A._Kershaw W.J.
Showski J.S. Abel T.R. Sommerfield i
H.E. Bliss G.
Sorenson T.C. Cihlar / G.E. Peterson K.J. Hansing R. Cosaro M.J. Wallace d
L.O. De1 George G.P. Wagner J.D. Deress / J.T. Westermeier QA Engineer - Braidwood i
E.E. Fitzpatrick QA Engineer. Byron D.P. Galle CA Engineer - SNED K.L. Graesser (NC only)
- 5. Woodford - IL&B J.F. Gudac W.E. Mortier - W i
J.H. Hughes M.A. Bowidewicz - S&L i
R.E. Jortberg C. Wright - State of Illinois j
N.J. Kalivianakis'(NC only) l' A.W. Kleinrath W.R. Bird - Consumers Power Co.
(NRC/ Ceco Ltre only)
]
D.E. Lindvall (RIII only)
J.J. Maley / 3.R. Shelton S.J. Brewer. Marble Hill
)
R.E. Querio (Ceco Ltra only)
V.I. Schlosser / C.J. Tomashek NL Distribution D.J. Scott J. Gallo - IL&S (Washington)
E.P. Wilkinson-INPQ (50 55e only)
J.S. Scott 1
B.5.
Stephenson D.L. Shamblin J
N.E. Wandke L.E. Davis l
i In the judgement of the Nuclear Licensing Administrator, the attached document contains the following commitments to the NRC or requirements i
from the NRC.
IDENTIFICATICN OF ATTACHED DCCUMENT:
{
Braidwood. March 2,1984 letter from ED Swarts to JG Xeppler provid-ing Interim 50 55(e) Report No. 84-01 concerning Comstock Document Review.
~
DUE DATE CCMMITHENT OR REQUIRZMEN"'
RESPONSIBLE DEPT /SUPV j
05/01/84 PM
/ MJ Wallace l
i Provide final report.
i l
When it is determined by the responsible department that a due date.
will not be met, the Nuclear Licensing Administrator should be notified immediately.
BF wartz NL-84-0272 I
FILE:
Braidwood 50 55(e) Report No. 84-01 i
A0015cc4 l
D7S l
.