ML20214D899

Applicant Exhibit A-136,consisting of 850906 Bcap Observation Record CSR-R-E-CND-110-01 Re J Lobue Signing as Level II Reviewer on 831102 on Insp Rept.W/Lk Comstock 821115 Memo & 850905 Bcap Memo 3269

ML20214D899
Person / Time
Site:	Braidwood
Issue date:	10/08/1986
From:	Patel, Patterson A, Shea L COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
References
OL-A-136, NUDOCS 8705210528
Download: ML20214D899 (9)

Text

. . __ __ _ _ _ .-.

v e

[h gbT -

.T/ ~ d E"

,f-/ /3C $n u r..,niWisiWYS%rWP

, IIAsum.... ,,w, e n.w;am ===rm n_

tct?;[JfD 6

'87 AER 21 P7 '.BCAP o OBSERVATION RECORD P.ge 1 or 3 9t' 1. OBSERVATION WO. M P. P e -q'A . ,g PART 1 -

OBSERVATION IDENTIFICATION & DESCRIPTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF ITEM (Equipment, Material, Component, Procedure):j3. PACKAGE NO.

Godbuer r~ o A tolt o

4. SYSTEM (if krc.in): 03 R-R-f*rdb.tto NlA 5. CHECKLIST / ITEM NO.

2

6. UNIT 1 lM UNIT 2 l. l COMMON 0 .

l l

8. EN hWICE REG 9.OBSEWED MING:

l- l Procedure Reviek

l. l Reinspection Implementation g -g lM CSR l- l RPSR l l RSCAP Documenta- Y tion Review gg

10. DESCRIPTION OF OBSERVATION:

TanJc ? l-CA dE Sid &ts A% 2;v'GL // PE t//pwet e ^) I' f3 OA3 n p" _L AJ s Per'T t Al cAc47' 5 Aen DreV3] *L-o S  ?) /~ It f f MfLu a L Ct/Et /L rWr7sp**4 7~YA/ ' A3 frdt urr %)t r fLA ATd2$

h

11. R ARED BY: / f k- tosin , *// f /t Signature / Date PART 2 9

OBSERVATION CLARITY, COMPLETENESS, AND ACC'JRACY REVIEW 12.C C nTS/ CLARIFICATION: ^) e ~ '.

8705210528 861008 gDR ADOCK 05000456 PDR

13. SUITABLE FOR FURTHER PROCESSING:

g. 14. REVIEWED BY:

~ Wl.a. 40 $  !=t r -s r I Sidnature Date 0353J-2 BCAP Fora 06-1 (Rev. 5)

- Q guAQ $w 6 U

BCAP OBSERVATION RECVRD Page 2 of 3

15. OSSERVATION NO.cse.n.e.a.2.,,

e PART 3 EVALUATION & DETERMINATION OF VALIDITY -

16. EVALUATION

17. DETERMINATION OF VALIDITY:

g 2 ,vatto S i. n- D,.--6_ wn < Q ,, J u ce II VAL 1D e

A 1I LwL a c~A:)Jdlk J yL -

A ,, u L g.L J'rL oe A AJ- t -

+r s 4s

$dad' Y 11/ 1e vterl mkw- ? k l- Y 6 5 ,- / e (

4/ f/

L Ye '

a e

/ TIo e$Y22~ & _ a_ mK'_l .

% hU - il - . Ja n Yebh l' W . c c w >ra<. k p . =,_ L d -

[k da8~/ qArMz..

e

• IS. EVALUATION & DETEJtMINi est ggjeg 3.ss 3

Steature

.. 19. CKNOW EQGED BY: 20. REVIEVED BY:

21. APPROVED BY:

9h/x 44 Atha.- 3/Wrs- O/p Sleature Da't e i Siesture Da t e l- Sinature De 3 04s Grw.n. s+1www3 /m s BCAP Pors'06-1 (Rev. 5) .

03S3J-2 *

= **

f,,( g' - ( 'mfC. .6 OnJ5TOCa L. K. COMSTOCK ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.

Memorandum Tom Sommerfield office: Braidwood From: Tom Corcoran

$g,,,

Signature on Quality Related Documents Date: Nov e5er 15. 1 Generated by LKCE QC Braidwood Site 82-11-15-06 "" R

' ""I" R

=

w  : L. i 6lk6 Per your request the following mutually agreed upon clarification regarding our joint meeting of week of 11/12/82 for what is meant by a signature on a quality document is as follows: '

1. A Level I Inspector's signature signifies what he on served in performing an inspection. ,

2. A Level II Inspector's ' signature on a Level I inspected document signifies that he is certified in the area for which the Level I signed for. This is to consist of his review of the Level I Inspector's ICR/NCR/ Inspection checklist, etc is; a) complete b) legible c) trackable d) clearly defines the status of the item inspected.

NOTE: He may elect to re-inspect any aspect particularily to;

._ a) completeness of the report b) verify condition reported by the Level I's findings c) clarify the Level I report d) satisfy himself that the Level I was adequately trained to perform the inspection reported for.

2.1 A Level II reviewer's signature for a Level II certified inspector who performed the initial inspection in the specific area covered does not have to be certified for the specific topic,he is re-viewing documents for. The initial Level II Inspector, however, must be certified for the area the reports affect.

• 2.2 The reviewer's Level II primary role in reviewing a certified Level II originator's documents is responsible for; a) completeness b) trackability of all relative documents /

ref erences, revisions of drawings, etc.

c) clearly defines the status of the item inspected for.

NOTE: A Level II reviewer cannot re-inspect a Level I or another Level II's unless specifically certified for the type of

~'* '

s, . ( . .. . e i, c i.: <t inspected area aff ected such as; a) cable pull b) weld inspection c) configuration

.f.) e ra NOTE: If re-inspection is warranted or dee=ed advisable, the reviewer is to obtain another Level II. who is certified for the specific procedure to be employed in concert with his review.

3. Quality Manager or his designee's signature does not require he be certified for** inspection" but shall signify he is qualified to analyze all pertinent records for: ,

. a) Certified Level II Inspector's performing in specific -

areas are utilized for the quality reports.

b) Trained Level I's Inspectors perform itial in-spections are proper 1 tr a aq cific area being r j kl r , ative to P/N #

t engineering / procedure instructions.

t ocuments are complete.

e) That all reports define correctly the requirements and specific nonconformance in sufficient detail to permit ICR/NCE review dispositions, actions as a consequence of reporting nonconformances.

NOTE: The use of a" referee action"by Quality Management or his designee is permitted only at a Supervisor / Engineer or higher technical level, subj ect to the customer's (CECO) concurrence. The rationale and disposition on reporting inspection findings must be clearly stated, on QC records subj ect to audit review or confirmation as to acceptability.

4 Quality Management or his designee's signature shall be indicative of proper and accurate statanants as to Corrective Action Taken and To Prevent.Re-occurrence, subj ect to audit (findings) by the originating auditor for acceptability.

N N Tom Corcoran QC Manager TFC/tja cc: Doug Brown Frank Rolan Rick Saklak Mike Kast C. K. S tiles W. A. Cardner Ale

__________________________ _______ ________n

< September 5, 1985 BCAP Memo 83269 To: N.N. Kaushal From: G.M. Orlov/L. Shea/D.J. Patel

Subject:

Invalidation of Observations -

The observations #CSR-I-E-EIN-112-02, CSR-R-E-CND-110-01 and CSR-R-E-CND-) OOC-84 were determined to be invalid by the CSR engineers for the reasons states in Part 3 of the observation forms. The Level II inspectors who wrote these observations had declined acknowledgment of the invalidation -

of these observations. Therefore, as required by BCAP-06, Section 4.4.5, a comunittee consisting of Mr. G.M. Orlov, Mr. L. Shea and Mr. D.J. Patel discussed disposition of these observations and recommend that you or your designee sign these observations as invalid. Mr. L. Shea, the Level III -

electrical inspector concurs that the reasons stated in Part 3 of these observations are sufficient to justify invalidation of the observations.

Mr. L. Shea has agreed to sign these observations on-behalf of you upon receiving your approval. ,

O,b N G.M. Orlov l g, +/ Q 4, Assistant BCAP Director Teh. tit 4A

• M b  :& k0 #

h c.

L. S ea Level III Electrical Inspector D.J. Patel CSR - Lead Electrical Engineer cc: BCAP File 69.20.19 QG 69.30.1 QG 69.60.3 QG 69.81.5 (2001J)

~

t

. /

1 .

BCAP OBSERVRTION REG i s Page 1 of 3 4

' 1. OBSERVATION NO. ,.32 P E-eNd < n PART 1 ,

t OBSERVATION IDENTIFICATION & DE5CRIPTICIf 2 DESCRIPTION CO 2&1

• feoOF A ITEM (Equipment, Material, Component, Procedure):l3. PACKAGE N Poe 00^6_h ? tt 0.1A GSO9 022 e~ e-eur) - TJ

4. SYSTEM (if kr w.): g

5. CHECKL ST/ ITEM'NO.

6. UNIT 1 l l WIT 2 l l

~

Colet0N 0 l_l [ ICI IIG l _~ l Procedure Review '

- l _ l Reinspection Implementation i l4Kl CSR l l RPSR l l RSCAP Documenta-I- I Review 2 g tion Review l - l Oh

10. DESCRIPTION OF OBSERVATION: L 386@:EC7 ION OOfM MA.S 4 " (./ A/E- 7 A/Fc06 9 " (dtTtf

, eor nu seiht v Data .

I I

11. PREPAREIVBY:

i R EC '. /f IT. " /2 p. I ocl . ICU.httY M ? %S ,

< stenature Date .

i i

! PART 2 F OBSERVATIObl CIARITY, COMPLETENESS, AND LN. REVIEW l j 12.Copeerts/cuutIPIchTICIf! AJdud '

l i

l i

(

13. SUITABLE FOR FURTHER PROCESSING:

g9g 14. REVIEWED BY:

, ,w/D is i-i s s .-

! tianature Date t l 0353J-2 m Pom 06-1 (Rev. 5)

dra.CWCCd 4 3 I L. K COMSTOCK & COMP.ANY, INC.

CLASS lE SAFETY RELATED CONDUlT

, , INSPECTION REPORT y ,3.pp CONOUli10 d//9dfd [ CONOUlT SIZE f S J - [' SEG CODE J' O f-LOCATION FROM /.TzI(>d/// TO /740/4 4 ELEV._ ft 7 '

OCR/FCR/ECN 1.//g INSTALLED BY / . Ed.gN/

/

DRAWING NO. PO 6 ~ / ~))c) f REV. [

ACC R EJ N/A 3.1.1 --CONOUlT INSTALLED PER ORAWING _ l lI l 3.1.2 SEPARATION MAINTAINER hl Il l 3.1.3 CONOUlT P'ROPERLY SUFPORTED I IU 3.1.4 FIELD CUT / EXPOSED THREAD COATED PER S & L FORM 1895F R 3.1.5 CORRECT COUPLINGS / BUSHINGS INSTALLED U 3.1.6 BENO RA01US MAINTAINED RC 3.1.7 CONOUlTS PROPERLY ID'D . R 3.1.8 SHARP EDGES REMOVED C

3.1.9 GROUNOING COMPLETED I l L ,,,,,j REMARKS -

k -

)if N O kl $ $l 11 /

._ iVu 1,I U b V1 N1 Ull Jll _I w- Af' l 3 w 1-- h *N

• Inspected By ate ' Reviewed By Level 11 Date I

l NEPARED APPROVED REvlSED TITLE ORI O. D ATE REV.DATE FOR*.NSR.

RAB RR PROCEDURE 6/1/80 80A's l

l L

/ .

DCAP OBSERVATION RECORD Page 2 of 3

15. 085ERVATION WO.c 5,2 et E o A-n -

PART 3 .

16. EVALUATION EVALUATION & DETERMINATION OF VALIDITY

• s, ll. DETERMINATION s OF VALIDITY:

lgl INVALID Alo e,M /J/T~ r f g _ m h c l-l VALID

_ we --, udA)A iL l- p k .qjnch ,

O ~ J -

An.r, a

< A d er> nt- w el L "7 6 m d ~ , av,,sn $ k -

,m, fw o Mf.e ,d . ,/anZ.l . Te j caf,hw 3 w TL m j bAsea c .s

(- A .., _.N u i em <<,_~ Y l (la I2' rwa <3

_ cf ?o rm A C+ w l c .-

^-NA u-e nb w nu e) ) .sca d.$ l W"

' ,)yWf~ ' .

\

s IIM ^ OWad$L nM6 i

l l -

l l

• I 1

. ' 18. EVALUATION & DETFJtMINAT Ett gg gjg

.- steature Dae

19. ACKNOW DGp SY: 20. REVIEVED BY:

5Afd 'Sfeature A %r Date i seko-Si@eture hk

21. APPROVED BY:

DateV V Stetture Dat-oman tw rman. rwrintm EcAP Form'06-1 (Rev. 5) . -

ohs 3J-2 '