ML20214D899
| ML20214D899 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 10/08/1986 |
| From: | Patel, Patterson A, Shea L COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | |
| References | |
| OL-A-136, NUDOCS 8705210528 | |
| Download: ML20214D899 (9) | |
Text
.
[h gbT
.T/ ~ d E" e
$n v
r..,niWisiWYS%rWP
,f-/
/3C IIAsum....,,w, n.w;am===rm n_
u e
tct?;[JfD 6
'87 AER 21 P7 '.BCAP OBSERVATION RECORD o
P.ge 1 or 3 9t'
- 1. OBSERVATION WO. M P. P e -q'A.,g PART 1 OBSERVATION IDENTIFICATION & DESCRIPTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF ITEM (Equipment, Material, Component, Procedure):j3. PACKAGE NO.
Godbuer r~ o A tolt o
- 4. SYSTEM (if krc.in):
03 R-R-f*rdb.tto NlA
- 5. CHECKLIST / ITEM NO.
2
- 6. UNIT 1 lM UNIT 2 l.
l COMMON 0 l
l hWICE REG
- 8. EN 9.OBSEWED MING:
l-l Procedure Reviek l.
l Reinspection
-g Implementation g
lM CSR l-l RPSR l
l RSCAP Documenta-Y gg tion Review
- 10. DESCRIPTION OF OBSERVATION:
TanJc ?
l-CA dE Sid &ts A%
2;v'GL //
PE t//pwet e ^)
I' f3 OA3 n p"
_L AJ s Per'T t Al cAc47' 5 Aen DreV3]
- L-o S
?) /~ t f f MfLu I
frdt urr %)t r fL ATd2$
a L Ct/Et /L rWr7sp**4 7~YA/
' A3 h
A 11.
R ARED BY: / f k-tosin,
- // f /t Signature /
Date 9
PART 2 OBSERVATION CLARITY, COMPLETENESS, AND ACC'JRACY REVIEW 12.C C nTS/ CLARIFICATION:
^) e ~ '.
8705210528 861008 gDR ADOCK 05000456 PDR
- 13. SUITABLE FOR FURTHER PROCESSING:
g.
- 14. REVIEWED BY:
Wl.a. 40 $
!=t r -s r I
~
Sidnature Date 0353J-2 BCAP Fora 06-1 (Rev. 5)
- Q guAQ $w 6 U
BCAP OBSERVATION RECVRD Page 2 of 3 15.
OSSERVATION NO.cse.n.e.a.2.,,
e PART 3 EVALUATION & DETERMINATION OF VALIDITY
- 16. EVALUATION
- 17. DETERMINATION OF VALIDITY:
- g 2,vatto S i. n-D,.--6_
< Q,, J u II VAL 1D wn ce e
A 1I LwL a c~A:)Jdlk J yL -
A,, u L g.L J'rL oe A
AJ-t
+r s
$da Y 11/ e vterl mkw- ? k l-Y 6 5,- / e 4s 1
d'
(
4/ f/
L Ye TIo e$Y22~ & _ a_ mK'_l a
e
/
% hU il d
Ja Yebh l' W. c c w >ra<. k p. =,_ L n
[ k da8~/ qArMz..
e IS. EVALUATION & DETEJtMINi est ggjeg 3.ss Steature 3
19.
CKNOW EQGED BY:
- 20. REVIEVED BY:
- 21. APPROVED BY:
9h/x 44 Atha.-
3/Wrs-O/p Sleature Da't e i
Siesture Da t e l-Sinature De 3 04s Grw.n. s+1www3 /m s BCAP Pors'06-1 (Rev. 5) 03S3J-2
f,,(
g' - (
'mfC.
=
.6 OnJ5TOCa L. K. COMSTOCK ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.
Memorandum Tom Sommerfield office: Braidwood Tom Corcoran From:
Signature on Quality Related Documents Date: Nov e5er 15. 1
$g,,,
Generated by LKCE QC Braidwood Site 82-11-15-06
"" R
""I" R
=
6lk6 w
L.
i Per your request the following mutually agreed upon clarification regarding our joint meeting of week of 11/12/82 for what is meant by a signature on a quality document is as follows:
1.
A Level I Inspector's signature signifies what he on served in performing an inspection.
2.
A Level II Inspector's ' signature on a Level I inspected document signifies that he is certified in the area for which the Level I signed for. This is to consist of his review of the Level I Inspector's ICR/NCR/ Inspection checklist, etc is; a) complete b) legible c) trackable d) clearly defines the status of the item inspected.
NOTE: He may elect to re-inspect any aspect particularily to; a) completeness of the report b) verify condition reported by the Level I's findings c) clarify the Level I report d) satisfy himself that the Level I was adequately trained to perform the inspection reported for.
2.1 A Level II reviewer's signature for a Level II certified inspector who performed the initial inspection in the specific area covered does not have to be certified for the specific topic,he is re-viewing documents for. The initial Level II Inspector, however, must be certified for the area the reports affect.
2.2 The reviewer's Level II primary role in reviewing a certified Level II originator's documents is responsible for; a) completeness b) trackability of all relative documents /
ref erences, revisions of drawings, etc.
c) clearly defines the status of the item inspected for.
NOTE:
A Level II reviewer cannot re-inspect a Level I or another Level II's unless specifically certified for the type of
~ ' * ' '
(... e i, c i.:
<t s,.
inspected area aff ected such as; a) cable pull b) weld inspection c) configuration
.f.)
e ra NOTE:
If re-inspection is warranted or dee=ed advisable, the reviewer is to obtain another Level II. who is certified for the specific procedure to be employed in concert with his review.
3.
Quality Manager or his designee's signature does not require he be certified for** inspection" but shall signify he is qualified to analyze all pertinent records for:
a)
Certified Level II Inspector's performing in specific areas are utilized for the quality reports.
b)
Trained Level I's Inspectors perform itial in-spections are proper 1 tr a aq cific area being r j
ative to P/N #
kl r
t engineering / procedure instructions.
t ocuments are complete.
e)
That all reports define correctly the requirements and specific nonconformance in sufficient detail to permit ICR/NCE review dispositions, actions as a consequence of reporting nonconformances.
NOTE:
The use of a" referee action"by Quality Management or his designee is permitted only at a Supervisor / Engineer or higher technical level, subj ect to the customer's (CECO) concurrence. The rationale and disposition on reporting inspection findings must be clearly stated, on QC records subj ect to audit review or confirmation as to acceptability.
4 Quality Management or his designee's signature shall be indicative of proper and accurate statanants as to Corrective Action Taken and To Prevent.Re-occurrence, subj ect to audit (findings) by the originating auditor for acceptability.
N N
Tom Corcoran QC Manager TFC/tja cc: Doug Brown Frank Rolan Rick Saklak Mike Kast C. K. S tiles W. A. Cardner Ale
________n
September 5, 1985 BCAP Memo 83269 To:
N.N. Kaushal From:
G.M. Orlov/L. Shea/D.J. Patel
Subject:
Invalidation of Observations The observations #CSR-I-E-EIN-112-02, CSR-R-E-CND-110-01 and CSR-R-E-CND-) OOC-84 were determined to be invalid by the CSR engineers for the reasons states in Part 3 of the observation forms.
The Level II inspectors who wrote these observations had declined acknowledgment of the invalidation of these observations. Therefore, as required by BCAP-06, Section 4.4.5, a comunittee consisting of Mr. G.M. Orlov, Mr. L. Shea and Mr. D.J. Patel discussed disposition of these observations and recommend that you or your designee sign these observations as invalid.
Mr. L. Shea, the Level III electrical inspector concurs that the reasons stated in Part 3 of these observations are sufficient to justify invalidation of the observations.
Mr. L. Shea has agreed to sign these observations on-behalf of you upon receiving your approval.
O,b N G.M. Orlov l
g, +/
Q 4, Assistant BCAP Director Teh. tit 4A M
k0 h c.
b L. S ea Level III Electrical Inspector D.J. Patel CSR - Lead Electrical Engineer cc:
BCAP File 69.20.19 QG 69.30.1 QG 69.60.3 QG 69.81.5 (2001J)
~
t
/
1 BCAP OBSERVRTION REG s i
Page 1 of 3 4
- 1. OBSERVATION NO.,.32 P E-eNd < n PART 1 OBSERVATION IDENTIFICATION & DE5CRIPTICIf t
2 DESCRIPTION OF ITEM (Equipment, Material, Component, Procedure):l3. PACKAGE N CO 2&1
- feo A Poe 00^6_h ? tt 0.1A GSO9 022 e~ e-eur) - TJ
- 4. SYSTEM (if kr w.):
g
- 5. CHECKL ST/ ITEM'NO.
- 6. UNIT 1 l
l WIT 2 l
l Colet0N 0 l_l
[ ICI IIG
~
l _~ l Procedure Review '
l _ l Reinspection I
Implementation l4Kl CSR l
l RPSR l
l RSCAP Documenta-Review I-i g tion Review l - l Oh 2
- 10. DESCRIPTION OF OBSERVATION:
L 386@:EC7 ION OOfM MA.S 4 " (./ A/E-7 A/Fc06 9 "
(dtTtf eor nu seiht v Data.
I I
- 11. PREPAREIVBY:
. ICU.httY M ? %S,
i R EC '.
/f IT. " /2
- p. I ocl stenature Date i
i PART 2 OBSERVATIObl CIARITY, COMPLETENESS, AND LN. REVIEW l
F j
12.Copeerts/cuutIPIchTICIf!
AJdud l
i l
i
(
- 13. SUITABLE FOR FURTHER PROCESSING:
g9g
- 14. REVIEWED BY:
,w/D is i-i s s.-
tianature Date l
t 0353J-2 m Pom 06-1 (Rev. 5)
dra.CWCCd 4 3 I L. K COMSTOCK & COMP.ANY, INC.
CLASS lE SAFETY RELATED CONDUlT INSPECTION REPORT y,3.pp CONOUli10 d//9dfd [
CONOUlT SIZE f S J - ['
SEG CODE J'
O f-LOCATION FROM
/.TzI(>d/// TO
/740/4 4 ELEV._ ft 7 '
OCR/FCR/ECN 1.//g INSTALLED BY
/. Ed.gN/
/
DRAWING NO.
PO 6 ~ / ~))c) f REV.
[
ACC R EJ N/A 3.1.1
--CONOUlT INSTALLED PER ORAWING l
lI l
hl Il l
3.1.2 SEPARATION MAINTAINER CONOUlT P' OPERLY SUFPORTED I
IU 3.1.3 R
3.1.4 FIELD CUT / EXPOSED THREAD COATED PER S & L FORM 1895F R
3.1.5 CORRECT COUPLINGS / BUSHINGS INSTALLED U
3.1.6 BENO RA01US MAINTAINED RC 3.1.7 CONOUlTS PROPERLY ID'D R
3.1.8 SHARP EDGES REMOVED C
3.1.9 GROUNOING COMPLETED I
l L,,,,,j REMARKS k
- )if N O kl
$ $l 11 /
iVu 1,I U b V1 N 1 Ull Jll _ I h *N
- w-Af' l 3 w
1--
Inspected By ate '
Reviewed By Level 11 Date I
l NEPARED APPROVED REvlSED TITLE ORI O. D ATE REV.DATE FOR*.NSR.
RAB RR PROCEDURE 6/1/80 80A's l
l L
/
DCAP OBSERVATION RECORD Page 2 of 3
- 15. 085ERVATION WO.c 5,2 et E o A-n -
PART 3 EVALUATION & DETERMINATION OF VALIDITY
- 16. EVALUATION ll. DETERMINATION OF VALIDITY:
s, s
lgl INVALID e,M /J/T~ r f g _ m h c l-l VALID Alo udA)A iL l-p k.qjnch O
J
_ we --,
~
An.r, a
< A d er>
nt-w el L
"7 6 m d ~
av,,sn $ k,m fw o Mf.e,d.,/anZ.l.
Te j caf,hw TL m j 3
w bAsea
(-
A.., _.N u i em
<<,_~ Y l (la I2' rwa <3 c
.s
_ cf ?o rm A
C+
l c
^-NA w
e u-W" nb nu e) ).sca d.$
l ',)yWf~
w IIM ^
OWad$L
\\
s nM6 i
l l
l l
I 1
- 18. EVALUATION & DETFJtMINAT Ett gg gjg steature Dae
- 19. ACKNOW DGp SY:
- 20. REVIEVED BY:
- 21. APPROVED BY:
5Afd A
%r seko-hk
Sfeature Date i
Si@eture DateV V Stetture Dat-oman tw rman. rwrintm EcAP Form'06-1 (Rev. 5) ohs 3J-2
'