ML20214D581
| ML20214D581 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 10/02/1986 |
| From: | Kaushal N COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Maiman T, Shewski W, Wallace M AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| References | |
| OL-I-ROREM-147, NUDOCS 8705210386 | |
| Download: ML20214D581 (4) | |
Text
.
\\
T forem - /g7 f
March 7, 1985 BCAP Mem6-1#S33:
'87 1M 22 P7 :24 TO:
T. J. Maiman W.
J. Shewski Ea.
M.
J. Wallace E. E. Fitzpatrick
~
FROM:
N. N. Kaushal
SUBJECT:
Revised Braidwood Construction Assessment Program Progress Report AttachedistherevisedversioNoftheBraidwoodConstruction Assessment Program Progress Report for January 1 thru January 31, 1985.
The original submittal contained typographical errors.
The revision incorporates a correction of these typographical errors only.
h N
M,
')J N.
N.
Kaushal BCAP Director
.it NNK/sjs cc:
R.
N. Gardner, NRC R.
L.
Byers G. M.
Orlov nectu: ncuutoar coumission H.
L. Vener al IN w n. N d N crwaita n N.
P.
Smith, QA k _ N /S* ^' b J. Hansel, ERC la the mer of BCAP File QG 69.60.3 S"
QG 69. 70. 2 e-Apc'! cant RECIIVID Interrenor RUECID Cont'g Ctft
~
8705210386 861002 unactor DAM
$DR ADOCK 05000456 Etnen P other
)4
,,a -
V E0004359 e
XirR16' (fiXHIBIT3WhNM8 g g g uymans'
=
t BRAIDWOOD STATION BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM REPORT PERIOD JANUARY l - JANUARY 31, 1985 I.
StMUutY/ STATUS This is the seventh monthly progress report for the Braidwood Construction Assessment Program (BCAP), covering the period from January 1 through January 31, 1985.
In the CSR area, the pace of inspections and related evaluations has increased. Advances were made in visual inspections and document review package preparation and inspection. Visual reinspections for one population, Conduit, were completed and related observations submitted to S&L for evaluation. The RPSR effort was involved with unincorporated Field Change Requests (FCR's) and checklist development for personnel qualification / certification, construction and field coating work requirements. Progress continues on all active programs in the RSCAP element.
l" As of January 31, the number of personnel assigned to the BCAP effort has risen to 123. Satisfactory office and clerical support continues to be available to the BCAP work force.
II.
SCHEDULE ANALYSIS CSR activities are generally on schedule. RPSR and RSCAP activities are, respectively, six and one week behind schedule for achieving project interin milestones; however, the scheduled completion of the draft final BCAP report is not expected to be impacted.
i III. PERSONNEL AND BOUIPMENT STATUS i
BCAP manpower totaled 123 as of January 31.
Five additional inspectors j
were certified during January.
Inspection personnel activities included training, accessibility walkdowns, reinspections, document reviews and supplemental observation detailing (e.g., weld mapping, configuration).
I conversion of observation and verification package tracking from Mapper to the IBM system was initiated. The program and data entry for-verification packages has been completed. Initial verification package tracking reports are expected to be generated by the IBM system during the first week in February. The program and data entry for observation tracking is also expected to be completed during the first week in February.
l E0004390
-1 l
0892J l
IV.
BCAP ELEMENT STATUS A.
CSR STATUS Preparation of inspection packages and performance of inspections continued. Forty-nine of ~10 checklists and instructions have been prepared. of these,-14 are being used for current inspections of plant hardware and dr.tamentation. Inspection packages are being generated at a rate of about 250 per week. Documentation reviews have begun in concrete Placement, Conduit, and Small Bore Pipe configuration.
i Additionally, during this period, activities concentrated on 1) i defining the three categories of the engineering judgment portion of i
the samples (related to safe shutdown, previously identified deficiencies, and high stress), 2) completing assembly of inspection packages for popdlations, 3) developing doctamentation review checklists for the group of populations for which inspections have begun, 4) developing the remaining checklists and instructions and 5) processing observations.
i On January 23, based partly on concerns expressed by the NRC resident inspector and partly on BCAP internal assessments, the inspections under the CSR element were temporarily suspended and a
" midpoint look" was initiated to factor-in the knowledge and ideas i
resulting from experience-to-date. As a result of this " midpoint look", specific actions were identified to enhance the quality of reinrpection checklists and instructions and also the inspectors' understanding of these checklists and instructions. Action plans were also identified for reverification of previously completed
.9 inspections in the area c,f piping and electrical hangers / supports.
Inspections in the areas of concrete placement and electrical and piping hangers / supports were placed on hold pending comple'cion of the identified actions.
Inspections in other areas were restaned on January 25, 1985.
B.
RPSR STATUS During January, the RPSR group was primarily involved in identifying unincorporated Field Change Requests (FCRs) that affect specifications applicable to the RPSR effort and finalizing checklists that contain constructic and personnel qualification / certification requirements. Three unincorporated FCRs were identified. Requirements frca these FCRs have been added to checklists. A preliminary review of a sampling of sheets from the 29 checklists involved was conducted. Results of that review have been incorporated in 18 of the checklists. The remaining checklists i
will be updated in February.
LOOO4391 0892J l
l i
Final review of the checklist for field coating work began on January 24.
Comparison of contractor procedural requirements to that checklist is scheduled to start on February 4.
The next checklist to be reviewed will be for inspection and testing services. Comparison of contractor procedures to this checklist is scheduled to be completed in late February.
C.
RSCAP STATUS In January, the RSCAP Group completed preparation of Ccenit:eent Lists, Procedure Review Check Lists, Implementation Review Checklists and Documentation Review Checklists for each of the Corrective Action Programs under RSCAP Review.
Field Review of
)
Contractor Implementation and Doctmentation Reviews were also conducted this month. Several observations have been initiated as a j
result. BCAP-QA conducted poveral surveillances of ths.RSCAP element with no findings.
i V.
PROBLEMS /DISCREPENCY FINDINGS i
A.
Implementation Problems No specific implementation problems were experienced during this period.
B.
Discrepancy Findings A total of 1486 observation reports Aave been written as of January 31, 1985. Of these, the review for validity has been ccepleted for 1017. of these, 865 have been determined to be valid discrepancies. Those forwarded to S&L for design significence determination currently nsaber 617.
As of the end of this report period, S&L has not identified any discrepancy as design significant.
VI.
RECOMENDATIONS 1
No specific recommendations are offered at this time.
o
'l l
b.b.f N. N. Kaushal BCAP Director l
t i
E0001392 0892J
~,,n.
,,.