ML20214C814

Response to Suffolk County First Request for Production of Documents Re Emergency Plan Exercise.Certificate of Svc Encl

ML20214C814
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	11/17/1986
From:	Cumming W Federal Emergency Management Agency
To:	SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY
References
CON-#486-1582 NUDOCS 8611210249
Download: ML20214C814 (51)

Text

.

15f9J t

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OCCHETED USNRC NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BeforetheAtomicSafetyandLicensingBoarh c er-

)

n In the Matter of

)

)

LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY

)

Docket No. 50-322-OL-5

)

(EP Exercise)

(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit I)

)

FEMA INITIAL RESPONSE TO SUFFOLK COUNTY'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS BY THE NRC STAFF AND FEMA I.

FEMA hereby responds to Suffolk County's First Request for Production of Documents dated and served on October 10, 1986. All documents not specifically privileged or for which other objection to disclosure is entered are released as follows:

A.

Documents within the possession, custody, or control of the NRC Staff or FEMA and otherwise collected, maintained, or stored in FEMA's central offices at 500 C st., S.W. are being produced at the offices of Kirkpatrick &

Lockhart,1900 H. Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Documents ~not produced and for which privilege or objection from disclosure is maintained by FEMA or NRC are indexed and a copy of that index is being produced at the offices of Kirkpatrick & Lockhart with this filing.

Copies of documents being produced and the index are being simultaneously served on Hunton & Williams at 2000 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C.

8611210249 861117 PDR ADOCK 05000322 G

PDR 9300 B.

Documents within the possession, custody, or control of the FEMA Regional Office or FEMA contractors were produced in accordance with NRC regulations, unless objected to or privileged, and made available for inspection and copying in Room

,26 Federal Plaza, New York, New York 10278 on November 12, 1986.

FEMA Counsel has produced copies in Washington for the convenience of all parties. Additionally, all documents not produced for which objection or privliege is claimed have been collected and indexed, and a copy of that index is being served on all partics.

C.

Documents not within the possession, custody, or control of FEMA at any of its locations are possibly subject to this request. While FEMA Counse) is endeavouring to make sure that the most comprehensive search possible is conducted there is certain information FEMA Counsel believes should be brought to the attention of all Counsel in this matter. As indicated in the FEMA GENERAL RESPONSE TO SUFFOLK COUNTY'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO FEMA dated October 30, 1986, at page 2, paragraph VI. certain individuals are no longer employed by FEMA or the federal government. Additionally, at the request of Senators Daniel P.

Moynihan and Alphonse D'Amato, the General Accounting Office was given complete access to all FEMA files in the central office and the FEMA Region II offices.

No controls were placed on that access and by letter dated

. November 4, 1986, from FEMA Counsel (enclosed with this cover filing) GA0 was asked to inventory and index documents copied or removed. GA0 has now requested that FEMA produce the index and FEMA will do so and furnish to all parties as soon as resources are available.

D.

Documents prior to the June 20,1965, Memorandum from Edward L. Jordan to Richard W. Krimm requesting that FEMA schedule an exercise have not been produced. FEMA objects to the production of documents prior to that date as not being relevant or material to any of the contentions proposed by the Intervenors, and no effort has been made to collect or index such documents.

Although FEMA is producing some documents subsequent to that date that are not otherwise privileged or subject to objection, all parties should be on notice that documents and discussions prior to FEMA agreeing to evaluate the exercise in a letter from Samuel W. Speck to William J.Dircks on October 29, 1985 are objected to in their entirety based on the ruling in Long Island Lighting l

Company (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1), ALAB-773,19 NRC 1333 (1984) l and appropriate affidavits supporting that claim of privilege will be produced if necessary.

II. By responding to this document production request FEMA does not waive it objections (1) to the method of service; (2) to the fact that FEMA is called on to respond for other federal agencies and FEMA or other agencies contractors; (3) that FEMA is not subject to formal discovery under the NRC rules and regulations and the FEMA-NRC Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated April 18, 1985; (4) that Counsel to Intervenors has evidenced in writing to Counsel for FEMA that the purposes of its discovery is to obtain information for use other than in this proceeding; (5) that FEMA by responding does not waive any objection based on ALAB-773, supra, and that ALAB-773 is binding on all parties.

I

.r-III. FEMA objects to production of any document in its possession that concerns onsite matters.

-IV.

FEMA objects to production of any document that may be considered to request information protected by the attorney-client privilege or the attorney work-product doctrine, and this objection includes present Counsel on the record, past Counsel on the record and for George Jett, formerly FEMA General Counsel (1979-1985), Spence Perry, present General Counsel (1985-Present),

George W. Watson, Associate General Counsel, Susan Kantor Bank, Assistant General Counsel, and Lori Jean, Assistant General Counsel, to include comprehensively all their work product presently and in past positions 'related to this matter.

V.

FEMA represents that its response to this First Request for Production of Documents has been prepared without the substantial participation of Roger B.' Kowieski with whom FEMA is currently involved in other legal proceedings.

See correspondence attached to this response.

VI. FEMA recognizes that this request for production is continuing but states that FEMA has produced or will produce by November 19, 1986, all documents not specifically objected to or privileged in accordance with reference to the specific numbered paragraphs of this first request dated October 10, 1986, (note that all documents not produced will be indexed and the index produced) and the FEMA response is set forth below:

1.

The resumes or statements of qualifications of each federal evaluator, simulator, and controller who participated in, or was present during the Exercise or any part thereof.

FEMA Response: Full production of all documents related to this request has been accomplish'ed.

e 1

, 2.

The re'sumes or statements of qualifications of each person present in the FEMA Command Post during the Exercise or any part thereof.

~

-FEMA Response:

Full production of all documents related to this request has been accomplished.

3.

All Documents and information generated in preparation for, during, or concerning, any of the training sessions and/or meetings attended by federal evaluators, controllers, and simulators on February 11 and 12, 1986.

FEMA Response: Objection to production based en materiality and relevancy

'and that such production is unlikely to lead to admissible evidence. A complete index to all such documents has been or will be provided to Counsel.

^

for Suffolk County. FEMA offers to _ provide these to the Board for j_n camera n

inspection to determine admissibility.

4.

Unredacted copies of all completed or partially completed, draft, or final copies, of " Exercise Critique Forms" prepared by any federal evaluators, simulators, controllers, observers or other FEMA or NRC personnel, prior to, during, or subsequent to the Exercise.

FEMA Response:

FEMA has previously furnished redacted materials in full compliance with this request.

FEMA is evaluating furnishing unredacted materials prepared the day,of the exercise, and understands that Counsel to Suffolk County may already have some unredacted materials within this request.

FEMA at this time objects to the release of unredacted materials since to do so would have a chilling-effect on future federal evaluators, simulators, controllers, observers.

5.

Unredacted copies of all completed or partially ecmpleted, draft or final copies of " Exercise Objectives Evaluation Forms" prepared by any federal evaluators, simulators, controllers, observers, or other FEMA or NRC personnel, prior to, during, or subsequent to, the Exercise.

i FEMA Resp 6nse:

FEMA has or will produce all copies of the forms prepared prior to, if any, or during the exercise in redacted form. FEMA does not know if any were prepared subsequent to the exercise, but if they exist they will be produced in redacted form.. The purpose of production in redacted form is to preserve from disclosure specific comments of individual evaluators that might have impact on their future participation or independence in evaluation of exercises of emergency preparedness plans and is protected under ALAB-773.

6.

Coreplete and unredacted copies of all logs generated or maintained by each and every evaluator, controller, simulator, observer, or other FEMA or NRC personnel, during or subsequent to the Exerciss, including all appendicet,

~

comments, and summaries which are a part thereof.

FEMA Response: Complete copies, but redacted for personnel l

identification, will be produced.

The purpose of redacting is to preserve FEMA claim of privilege under ALAB-773 and until FEMA's Motion to Reconsider is resolved.

7.

'All documents and information concerning the Exercise, or concerning roles, functions, duties, or events expected to occur during the Exercise, that were provided by FEMA, the NRC, or LILCO, to federal evaluators, simulators, controllers, observers, members of the Regional Assistance, other FEMA or NRC personnel, or any other persons at any time, orior to the Exercise.

FEMA Response:

These documents will not be produced by FEMA, and production is objected to based on the lack of relevancy or admissibility of these documents.

FEMA is willing to offer these to the Board for in, camera inspection to determine admissibility.

8.

Unredacted copies of all completed or partially-completed, draft or

' final copies, of all " Exercise Message Forms" generated prior to, during, or subsequent to the Exercise.

2

. FEMA Respo~nse:

No message forms were generated subsequest to the exercise. All those during the exercise have been produced in full.

Those draft or proposed messages prepared prior to the exercise are objected to and will not be released.

~

9.

Copies of all " Exercise Message Forms" which were prepared for, but not used, during the Exercise.

FEMA Response:

FEMA objects to the production of these documents based on relevancy and materiality to the exercise as conducted and evaluated.

10. Unredacted copy of the document entitled "Shoreham Exercise--Evaluation Assignment / Location Instructions."

FEMA Response:

FEMA has produced this document.

11. All notes, logs, summaries, or other documents, information, or communications concerning the Exercise prepared by FEMA Command post personnel, wherever located, before, during, or afterthe Exercise.

FEMA Response: FEMA wt11 produce all documents in the "before", or "during"' category. Any documents in the "after" category, if they exist, FEMA objects to their release as privileged under ALAB-773.

12. All lists of items to improve the plan and procedures prepared by LERO players or persons, provided prior to, during, or after the Exercise to the federal evaluators, simulators, controllers, or any other FEMA or NRC personnel.

FEMA Response:

FEMA or LILCO has or will produce all documents in this category.

13. Copies of all progress'or other reports, or other information or communications concerning the Exercise made by Bernard Weiss, K. Perkins, C.

Sakenas or any other controller, simulator or evaluator, to the FEMA Senior Controller prior to, during, or after the Exercise and all documents concerning such reports.

FEMA Response:

FEMA will not produce any documents before the exercise.

Documents produced subsequent to the exercise will not be produced based on ALM-773 and pending resolution of FEMA's Motion to Reconsider. Documents not otherwise privileged or objected to produced during the exercise will be produced.

14. Copies of all progress and other reports, or other communications made by the FEMA Senior Controller, or any other controller, evaluator, simulator, observer, or other FEMA or NRC personnel, to the FEMA Region II RAC Chairman prior to, during, or after the Exercise and all documents concerning such reports.

~

FEMA Response:

FEMA will produce all documents in this category during the exercise.

The documents produced before and after the exercise are objected to as not relevant or privileged based on ALAB-773 or based on the need to resolve concerns raised by FEMA Motion to Reconsider.

15. Copies of all progress or other reports, or other communications made by any federal evaluator, controller, simulator, team leader, observer, or other FEMA or NRC personnel, to any other federal evaluator, controller, simulator, team leader, observer, or other FEMA or NRC personnel concerning the Exercise, during or after the Exercise.

FEMA Response: No documents in this category will be produced based on ALAB-773 and the need to have FEMA's Motion for Reconsideration resolved prior to any release.

16. All documents, including notes, comments, or logs, listing, describing, or commenting upon discussions by controllers, evaluators, simulators or observers, with exercise players.

FEMA Response:

FEMA objects to this request based on form since it appears to rgquire comments upon comments. Personnel notes never released to FEMA or any other party but the recorder of the notes are objected to and will not be produced as privileged and protected by ALAB-773.

17. All information, communications, and documents provided to federal evaluators to be used as factual information in developing their evaluations.

. FEMA Response: All documents in this category will be produced.

18. All information and documents describing or concerning any communications, during the Exercise between (a) LILCO controllers, evaluators, observers, or other LILCO personnel or contractors, and (b) federal controllers. evaluators, simulators, observers, or other federal personnel.

FEMA Response: All documents in this category have previously been produced by LILCO, or are being reviewed by FEMA for determinations as to privilege and objections.

19. All information and documents describing or concerning any communications, during the Exercise, between (a) LILCO controllers, evaluators, observers, or other LILCO personnel or contractors, and exercise players.

FEMA Response:

All documents in this category have previously been produced by LILCO.

20. All " summaries" including drafts thereof, prepared by each evaluator on the evening of February 13, 1986, or at any other time summarizing his observations of the Exercise.

FEMA Response:

FEMA will produce no documents in this category based on privilege and as covered by ALAB-773.

21. All " Exercise Highlights Summaries," and drafts or portions thereof, prepared by each of the team leaders on the evening of February 13, 1986, or at any other time.

FEMA Response:

FEMA objects to the production of any documents in this category based on ALAB -773.

FEMA has produced Roger Kowieski's statement.

22. All documents, including narratives, summaries, notes, logs, evaluations, comments, critiques, or reports, concerning the Exercise, prepared by any federal evaluator, simulator, controller, observer, or team thereof, or any other FEMA or NRC personnel.

FEMA Response:

This request appears to be duplicative.

To the extent it is not, FEMA objects to the production of any documents in this categcry based on privilege,as asserted in ALAB-773.

23. All documents concerning the RAC Chairman's " Critique" of the Exercise, including such critique, and all portichs and drafts thereof.

FEMA Response:

FEMA will produce the final " Critique" but drafts will not be released and release is objected to based on the claim of privilege asserted in ALAB-773.

24. All drafts of the FEMA Report, and all documents, evaluations, comments. summaries or other information which form the bases for any conclusions, assertions, or facts contained in that report or which were used or referred to in preparing that Report.

FEMA Response: All documents in this category except for the final report will not be produced and are objected to.

The redaction is based on the privilege asserted in ALAB-773.

25. All Documents, including minutes, transcripts, summaries, or notes, concerning any meetings at which the FEMA Report, drafts thereof, or conclusions proposed to be, or actually contained in, that Report, were discussed.

FEMA Response:

FEMA objects to the production of documents in this category even with with personal comments redacted based on the privilege asserted and sustained in ALAB-773.

4 i

y y,_

y-

,--.p.__,

,____--_.y_-.

_.. ~

_.---_,--,,r-2__

l l

l t

26. All documents, including minutes, transcripts, summaries, or notes, concerning any meetings at which FEMA evaluations, critiques, or comments on the Exercise, were discussed.

FEMA Response:

FEMA objects to production of all documents in this category even with personal comments redacted based on the claim of privilege asserted in ALAB-773.

27. The medical drill scenario.

(

FEMA Response:

This document has been produced by LIiCO.

28. All correspondence, drafts, and other communications and documents

~

concerning proposed, draft, or actual objectives for the exercise.

FEMA Response:

FEMA will produce fully in response to this request once its pending Motion to Reconsider is resolved, and the material is still relevant and material to admitted contentions. FEMA is will to let the Board review this material in camera to expedite ~ consideration of admissibility.

29. All correspondence, drafts, and other communications and documents concerning the contents, development, revision, approval, or finalization of the Exercise scenario.

FEMA response:

FEMA will produce fully in response to this request once its pepnding Motion to Reconsider is resolved and the material is still revelant to admitted contentions.

FEMA is willing to produce to the Board for in camera inspection these materials to assist in that determination.

30. All correspondence and other documents concerning the scope of the Exercise.

, FEMA Response:

FEMA will produce fully in response to this rpquest once its pending Motion to Reconsider is resolved, and the information is still relevant and material to admitted contentions.

FEMA is willing to produce s

these materials for in camera inspection by the Board to determine admissibility and relevancy.

31. All correspondence and other documents concerning proposed or any other participants in the exercise.

FEMA Response:

FEMA will produce fully in response to this reauest once its pending Motion to Reconsi' der is resolved, and the information is.sti.11 relevant and material to admitted contentions.

FEMA is willing to present these documents to the Board for in camera review by the Board for the purpose of determining admissibility.

32. All correspondence and documents concerning the scope, methodology, and implementation of FEMA's evaluation of Exercise events.

FEMA Response:

FEMA ojects to the form of this request.

If the documents go to the issue of FEMA's evaluation techniques then it is committed to agency discretion and is not reviewable by an ALSB.

If it goes to the scope of the i

exercise, then FEMA will prodJce the documents for in camera review by the Board to determine admissiblilty.

Respectfully submitted, t

William R. Cumming Dated November 17th, 1986 Washington, D.C.

[

1 4

l t.

1-

• hi r -

F.ederal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472

[

November 4, 1986

):.YvonneC.Pufahl Evaluator

-Ganeral Accounting Office 500 C St. SW Washington, D.C.

20472

Dear Ms. Pufahl:

On October 10th and October 15th, the Federal Emergency Management Agency was served with extensive interrogatories and document production requests in the Atomic Safety and ;.tcensing Board proceeding on the Shoreham emergency preparedness exercise.

FEMA has answered the interrogatories and made extensive claims'of privilege. We also intend to do so in responding to the request for production of. documents.

It now has been brought to my attention that GAO had complete access to all FEMA files in connection with its ingdiry into certain legal issues :encerning this exercise.

In order to protect the Government?s litigation position, we request the following information:

(1) A c mplete inden and copy of all o&tarials removed from or copies made of FEMA files, and (2) A statement as to the personi who have had access to these materials.

In additic.1, I would appreciate having the opportunity of reviewing in advance any FEMA documents which you contemplate releasing outside of GAO.

I am sure you appreciate my concern that privileged documents are not inadvertently made available to the applicant, LILCO, the intervenors, or their attorneys.

Because the return date on the dccument production request is November 10th, we are requesting expedited traatment of this request.

Sincerely, N!!: 2^2-X1111am R. Cunuiing Office of General Counsel 8$

Enclosure:

Michael Miller Letter dated Nov. 4 c.;

[.m Y,fj 4.;,i.d k

&.$~ljfnk$h

,,.i67:

{

t MQ p

Federal Emergency Management Agency 5

~

Washington, D.C. 20d2 0

0 November 6, 1986 Susan M. Casey Kirkpatrick and Lockhart 1900 M Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20036

Dear Ms. Casey:

Enclosed is a copy of the Initial Herit Systems Protection Board (MSPB)

Decision, dated August 14, 1986, in the Roger B. Kowleski case.

This Decision is provided to you pursuant to your telephone conversation with me today and your conversation with William Cumming of this office.

Please also note the Errata Notice dated August 15, 1986 (also provided herewith) from the MSPB, citing the correct MSPB Occket Numbers.

Provision of these documents fully -

satisfies your telephone request of this date.

Sincerely, W

.N('

Robert S. Brock Attorney Office of General Counsel

! Official File: MSPB

! Brock, Ainora, Perry, Cumming, Watson, Gen't Law

!OC50s a

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD NEW YORK REGIONAL OFFICE I

)

ROGER B KOWIESKI,

)

DOCKET NUMBERS Appellant,

)

NYO3518610475

)

NY34438610472 v.

)

)

TEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

)

AGENCY,

)

DATE August 14, 1986

)

Agency.

)

)

BEFORE Arthur Joseph, Administrative Judge INITIAL DECISION INTRODUCTION This case is before me on appellant's petition for appeal challenging two separate agency

actions, specifically, a

reclassification downgrade and.

a reassignment by reduction-in-force (RIF) regulations.

The appeals have been joined because they contain similar issues, and joinder would expedite case processing without adversely affecting the parties' interests.

5 U.S.C 5 7701

_ 2)

(1982 & Supp. II 1984); 5 C.F.R.

5 1201.36(a)

(2)

(

(f)

(1986)I see also Moylan v. Department of Transportation, 735 F.'2d 524, 525 (Fed. Cir. 1984).

For the reasons that follow, the appeal is DISMISSED.

f ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS Effective May 25, 1986, appellant's position of Natural and Technical Hazards Program Manager, GM-14 was reclassified downward to the position of Supervisory Natural and Technical Hazards Program Specialist, GM-13 based on the agency's determination that the position had been erroneously classified.

Appellant received grade and pay retention under 5 U.S.C.

55 5362(a) and 5563(a)

(1982 &

Supp. II 1984).

On June 21, 1986, the agency invoked RIF procedures due to lack of funds and reassigned appellant to the position of Civil Engineer, GS-13.

In his petition, appellant challenges the agency actions.

This case presents jurisdictional issues. The Board's jurisdiction is limited to those areas specifically granted by statute or Office of Personnel Management regulation.

Cowan v. United States, 710 F.2d 803 (Fed. Cir. 1983). In Schaffer v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 751 F.2d 1250 (Fed. Cir. 1985), the United States court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that a reclassification downgrade does not constitute an appealable adverse action under 5 U.S.C.

5 7512 (1982 & Supp. II 1984) when an employee receives grade and pay retention. See also Knepp v. Department of the Navy, 709 F.2d 37 (9th Cir.

1983);

Atwell v.

Merit Systems Protection Board, 670 F.2d 272 (D.C. Cir. 1981).

The Board has adopted the Courg's holding.

Cariddo v.

Department of the Navy, 26 M. S. P. 51.

625, 627 (1985)

(holding that a

. downgrade to correct classification errors is not appealable)i Carter v.

Small Business Administration, 28 M.S.P.R.

296, 299 (1984).

A reclassification downgrade may constitute an appealable RIF action if the reclassification resulted from a change of duties.

Goodrich v. Department of the Navy, 686 F.2d 169 (3d Cir. 1982).

An employee may appeal a RIF action only if he or she was separated, demoted, or furloughed for more than thirty days by RIF procedures.

5 C.F.R. 5 351.901 (1986).

In the instant case, appellant has not alleged nor does the record otherwise show that the reclassification downgrade resulted from a change of his job duties.

The agency's invocation and application of RIF procedures i'

I resulted in appellant's reassignment rather than his i

demotion.

See 5 C.F.R. 5 210.102(4) (1986).

When afforded an opportunity to establish jurisdiction, appellant did not present argument and evidence showing that he suffered an appealable action either under 5 U.S.C. 5 7513 (d) (1982 &

Supp. II 1984) or 5 C.F.R. 5 351.901-(1986).

Accordingly, appellant failed to establish that the Board has In view of this finding, I jurisdiction over his appeals.

make no determination on the timeliness of the appeals.

DECISION The appeals are DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.

i e

m

_4

,/

REVIEW RIGHTS Administrative Review This initial decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board will become a

final decision of the Board on September 18, 1986 unless a petition for review is filed by that date or the Board reopens the case on its own motion.

5 C.F.R. SS 1201.113.117 (1986).

Any party or the, Office of Personnel Management may seek to have it reviewed.

by the Board by filing a petition for review with:

Office of the Clerk Merit Systems Protection Board 1120 Vermont Ave., N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20419 in accordance with 5 C.F.R. 5 1201.114 (1986) of the Board's regulations.

The parties should note that they are required to serve any petition for review and any subsequent pleading on all other parties.

The petition for review must be filed on or before September 18, 1986 and must set forth objections to the initial decision, supported by references to applicable laws, regulations, and the record.

Judicial Review Any appellant adversely affected or aggrieved by a final decision of the Board may file a petition with the United' States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, if the Court has jurisdiction. 5 U.S.C.

5 7703 (1982 & Supp. II 1984).

A petition may not be filed while the case is

- pending before the Board.

To be timely, the petition for

{udicial review must be received by the Court within thirty (30)

' days after the Board's decision becomes final.

Petitions must be sent to:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 717 Madison Place, N.W.,

Washington, D.C.

20439.

FOR THE BOARD:

dA Arthur Jospgh [

Administr K1ve Judge I

e e

a*

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the enclosed Initial Decision was sent by regular mail this date to each of the following:

Accellant Roger B. Kowieski g

c/o Federal Emergency Management Agency Region II 26 Fedreral Plaza New York, New York 10278 Acency Reeresentative Robert S. Brock Office of the General Counsel Federal Emergency Mangement Agency 500 C. Street S.W.,

Room 840 Washington, D.C.

Other Mr. Timothy Dirks, Chief Appellate Policies Division Office of Agency and Labor Management Relations Office of Personnel Management 1900 E Street, N.W., Room 7635 Washington, D.C.

20415 p,

g August 14, 1986

$o Maxwell fag

~

Adm% a R.inistrative Officer (Data)

• G e

?

^' '

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD NEW YORK REGIONAL OFFICE

)

ROGER B. KOWIESKI,'

)

DOCKET NUMBERS Appellant,

)

NYO3518610472

)

NY34438610475

)

v.

)

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

)

DATE: August 15, 1986

)

AGENCY,

)

Agency.

)

)

BEFORE Arthur Joseph, Administrative Judge ERRATA NOTICE The parties are advised that the correct docket numbers of the two cases captioned above are NYO3518610472 and NY34438610475, rather than NYO3518610475 and NY34438610472 as denoted in the decision of August 14, 1986.

" / sl.ND!!g)

Q

-l hCA E

FOR THE BOARD:

Arthur Joseph Administrative Judge

- + ' - -

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby -certify that the enclosed errata notice was sent by regular mail this date to,each of the individuals identified below:

Accellant Kowieski Roger B.

c/o Federal Emergency Management Agency Region II 26 Federal Plaza New York, NY 10278 Acency's Recresentative Brock Robert S.

Office of the General Counsel Federal Emergency Management Agency 500 C Street, S.W., Room 840 Washington, DC 20472 Other Timothy M. Dirks, Chief Appellate Policies Divisionoffice of Agency & Lab Office of Personnel Management 1900 E Street, N.W.,

Room 7635 Washington, DC 20415

/

p August 15, 1986

'$onga R.'M'axwell/mw (Data)

Administrative Officer t

4

OGC DOCUMENTS NOT PRODUCED AS PRIVILEGED (1) Legal Memorandum from Spence W. Perry to Samuel H. Speck dated April 1, 1986, subject:

Public Meeting Proposal in Connection with FEMA Shoreham,

Evaluation and Report.

(2) Litigation flie on U.S. v. Cohalan.

(3) Litigation file on Kowieski v. FEMA.

l

FEMA Headcuarters Documents Witheld Re No. 15 1

March 12,1986 Draft Post Exercise Assessment (PEA) of the Febtvaty 13, 1986 Exercise of the LILCO Transition Plan containing handwritten review notations by M. Lawless.

2 March 19,1986 Letter frcm J. H. Keller, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) to Roger Kowieski, FEMA, Reaion II, re: Coninents on the Draf t Shoreham Report.

3 April 3,1986 Letter frcrn T. Baldwin, ANL to M. Lawless, FEMA Head-quarters transmitting copies of draf t PEA for the Febtvaty 13, 1986

~

Shoreham exercise.

4 April 4,1986 Letter from T. Baldwin, Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) to M. Lawless, Headquarters transmitting the Anril 7,1986 draf t PEA Section 3 (Schedule for Correcting Deficiencies or Areas Requiring Corrective Actions) and Section 4 (Sunmary of Deficiencies or Areas Requiring Corrective Action).

5 April 7,1986 Draf t PEA of the Febtvat,/ 13, 1986 exercise containing handwritten review notations by R. Turner, FEMA Headcuatters.

6 Selected pages fran the April 7,1985 Draf t PEA containina handwritten notations.

7 Undated handwritten notes entitled " Bullets for Director's Meetino with D'Amato."

8 Personal handwritten notes by R. Krimm, FEMA Headquarters.

/

. ~L% w-ST ge g.h{ M 6 KW"~ ~ ~ '

y, p ;,

~ ~ 7

,~

, ;, 9 - #c

~c q Jse $ f .py, ,/y g.w e-?2 K ~ ' o ( ~2. \\ ( ryL w d 1 ~ y + sww "'f - c n ", n i t l

l GONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY 000 SotikCass AtNtt.ARGOw,b 604W November 3, 1986 Philip McIntire Federal Emergency Management Agency l / Ra. 1351 26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10276 ~

Dear Phil,

You will find enclosed the inventory of documents and information from the FEMA Region II files concerned with the shoreham 1986 Exercise. This list was compiled in your of fi,ces last week by Tom Baldwin and Phyllis Becherman and then sent to Argonne for final typing. It is complate with the information sent to me at the close of buisness Friday 10/31/86. Please see that Tom Baldwin receives this list. Call me if you have any questions, at FTS-972-4878. Sincerely, 13 4 wigamcasper cc: K. Bertram T. Surles USDqwmtst d Eccv Tk htwTy dO*xo

---

m.

---

= ---w-y- -, - -

Notebook 01 No material relevant to exercise. I Notetvxk i2 I ~ No matarla1 relevant to exercise. d I 1 I ~

---

,-----,m-rmw-g

.-.,y-,---.-m --.--yy w.--,,-

I l 1 l Notebook iSn No material related to exercise. f Notebook ISB 4/28/84 letter from S. Speck to W. Dircks rev. exerelse. 1. 5/17/84 Testimony of L. Giuffrida before subcommittee on Energy and the fl 2. Environment rd, exploratory steps toward planning for exercise (see pg. 9). ,8 \\ i ll \\ / .? l . Notebook #4 l e / 3/26/85 letter from E. Markey to L. Giuffrida re. DOE / FEMA contact regarding test , j .l .G f 1. of plan. ., g \\ J 3/14/85 letter from J. Gallagher to H. Dexter objecting to NRC staff observing "\\t['2. ,5 " tabletop exercise." 2/20/85 letter from R. Krimm to J. Gallagher re. LILCO request for graded J 3. exercise. 1/28/85 letter from L. Giuffrida to M. Cuomo re, exercise. 4. MM 11/14/84 letter from J. Leonard (LILCO) to H. Dexter-re. exercise objective. S. $NWC l/ C ? ~ Notebook 85, p.1 of 1 Draf t Memo from R. Krlmm to E. Jordan re. scheduling of exercise, with ? ,7, j). 8 1. 10/25/85 '(i' comments by R.K. 9/17/85 Letter from N. Palladino to E. Markey re. conduct of emergency exerelse 'J 2. f 9/24/85 !stter from S. Speck to J. Carpenter explaining that exercise for Shoreham t TM, [W# 3. not scheduled. ? %( 1/14/85 letter from J. Gallagher to R. Krimm re. Suffolk County's ,ju LILCO request for graded exercise.

r l, j'8' h

V/ 5. S/7/85 Letters from S. Speck to E. Markey, T. Downey and R. Mrazek re. their e W y o ii t eretse. [' d' 69, 7 ppos t on o ex g 4/5/85 letter from G. Jett to E. Mariiey re. FEMA's role relative to exerelse. b 6. %ffs + fy z f 2/ e ,, _ _. _, _ _. ~.

.o f ff 7. 7/25/85 letter from P. Cohalen to A. Prodell re. Shoreham-Wading River Central [ ',4.f , School D! strict. ~ ep , g" 8. Package of correspondence related to M. Cuomo opposition. ..( s l ' #f[f.g/ From S. Glass on 7/8/85, dated 10/24/84, FEMA Testimony Concerning Exercise. l O[~ f 9- ,10. 1/11/85 letters from W. Direks to J. Gallagher and M. Cuomo re. LILCO proposed W "' 2/11/85 exercise, iy, e f, # 11. 6/20/85 morno from E. Jordan to R. Krlmm re. scheduling exercise. f,<ff 12. 6/7/85 letter from S. Speck to R. Belate re. FOIA request. 13. 5/31/85 Shoreham -- Background Paper. ~ t,.j.h-v. 14. 6/Ei35 Package from R. Turner to R.K. of various documents provided to S. Speck. g.. i. e#15. 6/5/85 Package from Technical Coordination meeting. ,s \\ C#16. 5/29/85 Package of correspondence with J. Carpenter. ,j Notebook #6, p.1 of 6 i.p s/f M ' 1. 1/24/86 Memo from R.K. to File re. exerelse planning meeting. I" Lc.. A-s ..i:3 2. 1/23/86 Memo from R.K. to File re. conference call with exercise controllers and $r',(i 50 simulators. p.- /s 3. 1/23/86 Letter from R.K. to D. Schweller, Brookhaven Office re. facilities and [/'l equipment for exercise. < ?r,af"W' 4. 1/22/86 Letter from C. Daverlo. LILCO, to R.K. re. exercise scenarlo. .. + 1 js - y y:.a 5. 1/22/86 Letter from H. Plaine, NRC, and G. Watson, FEMA, to P. Cohalen, Suffolk I r (M County, re. Suffolk County Local Law 2-86. 6. 1/15/86 - Memo from R.K. to record re. exercise planning meeting. ggw& "uu [g,$/#).,1/15/86 - Memo from S. Glass to S. Perry re. Implications of f. Law on Shoreham exeretse, with memo from R.K. to S. Glass raising questions. p vM 8. 1/10/86 - Letter from J. Christman to S. Glass re. Revision 6 of Shoreham Local e f.""g Offsite Radiological Emergency Response Plan. ",r p8'* 9. 1/16/86 - Memo from R.K. to Record re. Shoreham Exercise meeting. .$9a. -

l c 10. 1/10/86 - ASLB document dated 9/18/84 with " Predictive Finding" reference sent from Bob Turner to R.K. f,dmc/ fGew 4E#-b'y. 37p'n -sL% c.M t.-, Agax tW< <9./, ? '# ? "'7 cs 11. 1/21/86 - Memo from R.K. to all REP observers, controllers /s!mulators re. enerolse. 4-6pO'c.ln dLCC:-x i 12. 1/15/86 - Letter from S. Speck to S. Heaven transmitting !!st of FEMA reports on Shoreham. gag 13. 1/23/86 - Draft of 43 above. /h4e.cc cf 14. 1/22/86 - Letter from Daverlo to R.K. re. exercise scenario (this is d!fferent from

1. 4 above). C3,fecA<f A /M c m J

rr 15. 1/23/86 - Draft Exercise Objectives. f@,uMu/ t.*M% 16. 1/22/86 - Memo from R.K. to S. Glass re. attending LILCO drill on 1/30/86 and Information in 2/13/86 Exercise, f,.m(c.<g 46 cc./ce( c 4, OA f 17. Handwritten copy of document with numbers of evaluators, controllers, simulators, controller duties, simulators duties, jJg dc,,cceg/' 18. 1/15/86 - Letter from S. Speck.to G. Blass, Suffolk County Leg!alature responding to #19 below. jpg,g. 19. 1/9/86 - Letter from G. Blass to Beeton re. FEMA's " continuing Indifference" to Suffolk County. /h(.cc e <f 20. 1/13/86 - Letter from S. Speck to D. Moynihan re, exercise. f?inc :s ' Notebook #6 can't., p. 2 of 6 21. 1/8/86 Letter from R.K. to Daverlo re. revised objectives and proposed list of demonstrations. [4cc/ccf W. res tzu 22, 1/9/86 Memo from R.K. to file re. conversation with R. Wilkerson re. controllers and simulators. chyM,4 fcI-N 23. 1/10/86 Comments on draft letter to P. Cohalen re. Suffolk County Law. 24. 1/8/86 NRC Staff's Answer to lntervenors'" Motion for Cancellation of Emergency Planning Exerciae." f:.dific DC 4sd WY,P'-rducw 25. 1/8/86 - Memo from B. Welsa, NRC.to.R.K. re. exercise.' eq& m Dflux w 28. 1/8/86 - Letter from J. Keller to R.K. re. revised Shoreham scenario. ^ Sfp. c fed n WW

, as exercise material h 1/3/86 - Letter from J. Keller to M. Lawless re. Sho distribution, ble-SlC=S 27. i e objections. Letter from J. Keller to R.K, re. Shoreham exerc s 28. 13/12/86 (Jfp:Ved7c.'cLCW ld dose. ^ 12/11/85 letter from,J. Keller to R.K. re. scenarlo projected th i<')&fM -n tkC.uw i J. Keller has dose 29. letter from J. Keller to R.K. re. scenarlo rev ews ( d p.c 4 / -m Mc.(c % c 30. 12/11/85 MA comments on draft calculation. 1/6/86 letter from Daverio to R.K. re. response to FE brfo ged% 31. exercise scenario. pf M and WCTO participation in 1/3/86 - Memo from E. Jordan to R. Krimm re. WGS T Shoreham emergency notification system. de,4cc 32. S. Speck re. numerous 1/2/86 letter from M. Ashare, Suffolk Count g.ff e. a c, 33. R. Wilkerson. 1/7/86 description of what FEMA plans to evaluate, faxed to CGyec k.n 1 c cc a to R.K. clarifying 34. i t 1/31/85 letter from W. Stokes, Theodore Barry & Assoc a es t.,,c rJ ' 7c. f

u s,-

notes regarding a briefing provide'd by W. Stokes. j, c 35. Officer requesting ~ i letter from S. Reaven to Freedom of Informat on 12/16/85 36. documents. j.' 9(tccc.g' d 1/6/86 draft response to #36 above. / 3,2facc d re. participation of 37. Letter from W. Renz, LILCO to U.S. Coast Guar ce6.cc ricc/ fr 4'cLcw 38. 12/30/85 Coast Guard in exercise. j 1/6/86 Memo from R.K. to file re. planning meeting.c (,p.w 4.~-M 39. 1/6/86 Note from Bob to Roger re. hotel rooms. /. w.b x u d,' l d* A 4 4' 40. i ment. 12/18/85 Telecon note from Paula C. re. H. Fish object ve c C b g c A w '1;; L L i & k C 41. Notebook #5 con't., p. 3 of 8 Suffolk County ordinance. Memo from B. McAda, OPA to H. Mayer re. /WAu.ced uter listing of homebound, 42. 1/24/85 1/31/85 Letter from C. Daverlo to R.K. re. comp %'M' r e - C -< -r.. mobility impaired. Od,jec/ fr fMW - ac(. 43. List of missing procedures, attachments, etc. $ry@% 'r,64 &-(rf V 44. "'"'N-m

45. 12/13/85 Memo from R.K, to R. Acorno re. exerelse legistles. ya e-sco-cw 46. 1/3/86 Memo from R.K. to file re. Controllers plan. Cby cluf P 4:Ccw 47. 1/3/86 Memo from S. Bank to S. Perry re. D07 meeting on Shoreham. j% eau %cl .A2o,!LLM<- 48. 1/3/86 Memo from R.K. to R. Wilkerson re. exeretse communications. fw&cu(-

49..1/3/86 Letter from E. Markey to J. Beeton re. numerous concerns.

(%rdo& 50. 12/27/85 - Letter from S. Speck to E. Markey responding to letters of 12/10, 12/13, and 12/201985. /&-t.crfu.cc.c.f 51. 11/21/85 Memo from R. Krimm to E. Jordan re. transmittal of objectives. [Ox c % ; .MM 52. 12/20/85 Memo from R.K.~to File re. meeting to.dtseuss contro!!ars plan. GbpM74 f.t c. lear. 53. 12/20/85 letter from S. Speck to M. Lang, Supervisor, Town of Southampton, re. withdrawing exerelse. 773,4 e

54. ~12/20/85 letter to K. Letsche from S. Glass re. K. Letsche letter of 12/17/85.

?' :. z k& -,t. / A4 wcac'9 lu.~ ~: ^ ,c-letter from C. Daverio to R.K., re. revised objectives and proposed 55. 12/19/85 demonstrations.. fy fr.c/ re g.t 4 co-x 56. 12/17/85 letter from R.K. to W. Stokes re.12/6/85 meeting. cb wfed.%.hLew 57. 12/6/85 letter from C. Daverio to R.K. re. draft scenario. c b g t./ed* m t c< C M 58. 12/17/85 letter from S. Speck to M. Ashare re. Shoreham meetings. K Le-:lcc cct! 59. 12/13/85 letter from C. Daverlo to R.K. re. LILCO/ FEMA meeting on 12/12/85 and C. Deverlo/R.K. Telecon on 12/12/85. ',a ; M L C 4 x" ggcc.fca 60. 12/13/85 letter from R.K. to C. Daverlo re. review of draf t scenarlo. [.bw c r'ed',m, ic. L C c ac d Notebook #4 con't., p. 4 of 8 61. 12/13/85 letter from R.K. to C. Daverlo re. revised objectives and proposed list of demonstrations, p/

1. ceg b ft4 bW 11/6/85 proposed exercise objectives for the 1986 Shoreham exerelse, followed by 82.

J. Keller mark-up of same. gff c #e</ fo /LC h. 63. 12/13/85 RAC comments on propose ( exercise objectives. n f gh4M - l C&uJ:ej 84. exeretse logistics. llitYuc:cl Y

3 65. Activities to be' demonstrated. g-p c c 7cc. Y '

1. d '

g 66. 12/12/85 Memo from R.E. to M. Jackson re. evaluator schedule and director itinerary. [tgue,d j 67. 12/12/85 letter from P. Krueger to E. Markey re. Theodore Barry & Associates. /'w:Aa.cC4 68. 12/12/85 letter from C. Moorhead to J. Becton re. Theodore Barry & Associates. 8e,tGuc :d i 68. 12/10/85 letter from E. Markey to J. Becton re. Theodore Barry & Associates, (W.xu cM' 70. 12/13/85 Memo from R.K. to File re. meeting with LILCO to discuss objectives and scenarlo. $j ./.ef p,ig k a. fl. 12/12/85 letter from J. Keller to R.K. re additional scenarlo comments. C 0;e c 4 e[ n,Q C.L cc w 72. 12/10/85 Memo from R.K. to File re. meeting with Argonne staff. 06g e cM-fc t.c.WW s 73. 12/10/85 Memo from R.K. to File re. R. Bernack! request to observe reception [byts fa/ D ;'Mi C-W centers. r LERO Functions Offsite.WW n, 74. CG <4 iM 75. 12/9/85 letter from W. Stokes to R.K..re objectives. C6,gcf W p..tLL C+>c 76. 12/6/85 from T. Baldwin, obj'ectives.' p.hcc et e --;, % 77. 12/6/85 from C. Daverlo to R.K. re. scenario..- ClyeC#W2% M " h'- 78. 12/6/85 Memo to numerous recipients (RAC members) from R.K. re. objectives. c Q p e r~ d ;s,. 9 L c + s.t. 79. 12/4/85 Memo to numerous recipients (RAC members) from R.K. re. proposed ~ exercise. ( ec,M ' M;tc(_. w 80. 11/26/85 Memo from E. Tanzman to R.K. re. 11/25/85 meeting with LILCO. Cd,Ac feJ -5c.Lc L cc-x l 81. 11/21/85 Memo from S. Speck to F. Petrone re. exercise scheduling. ( ! e-:ia cw 82. 11/27/85 Memo from R.K. to P. McIntire re. typing support. /l t-6.<ced Notebook #4 con't., p. 5 of 8 83. 11/27/85 Memo R.R. to File re. telecon.with M. Novak. DOE., pe +. fitcd m -Ofy4/M p / ben-M 84. 11/25/85 Letter from J. Weismantle, LILCO to R.K. re. security during scenarlo development. ,j g g-b y ' Y 2/

55. 11/20/85 Letter from E. Jordan (unsigned) to R. Krlmm re. pre-exercise communications. j'3 g c,ccc[

86. 11/21/85 Memo from R. Krimm to R.K. re. authorization for meetings with LILCO. / f m m c,[

87. 11/20/85 Letter from E. Jordan to R. Krimm re. pre-exercise communications (slightly different from #85 above), gggg

88. 11/25/85 Memo from E. Jordan to T. Martin re. proposed objectives.

Gbf-<- W,A /tZ.J.4 m

89. 11/21/85 Memo from R. Krlmm to E. Jordan re. transmittal of objectives.

C6&4d &,MLW

90. 11/20/85 Memo from'R.K. to file re. meeting.tn TEMA national office, o$g-/'e4 TyAd-W

91. 11/12/85 Letter from 'M. Cuomo to S. Speck re. New York State opposition to

) FEMA holding or assisting in the holding of Shoreham exercise. t -u--mc.e4 v

92. 11/15/85 Memo from R.K. to file re._Markey's Congressional hearing on Shoreham.

i fhc-dc& W. Stokes, Shoreham Exerclae Control Plan. /

93. 11/12/85

[g p p g,y M pa+:ctj" ""'* ~ p

94. 11/15/85 Letter from R. Doremus, Superintendent of Schools, Shoreham-Wading River Central School District, to F. Petrone re, desire to cooperate.

(talan'

95. 11/14/85 Statement of S. Speck before Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power.

/bhd f

96. 11/14/85 Copy of oral statement (from 95 above) summarlzed from other copy (per note from Bob).

4 r

97. 11/12/85 Letter from W. Dircks to S Speck re. scope of exercise.

f,'u-4tucLc:-

98. 11/12/85 Letter from M. Ashare, Suffolk County Attorney, re. opposition to exercise.

7,,ufcu r Questions & Answers on Shoreham (Revision 5 + Exerelse), 43 questions and 99. fg,,,, ,,5 answars. 100. 11/12/85 Letter from M. Lang, Supervisor, Town of Southampton, to S. Speck re. opposition to exercise. g.g*g d i 101. 11/7/85 letter from P. Cohwar;to N,.Paladinct re. opposition to exercise. /> L:zi w cc.c.F 102. 11/6/85, Memo from R.K. to R. Krimm re. scheduling of exercise. jhwe.fu x[ & E$ U

7 Notebook #6 con't., p. 8 of 6 103. 11/7/85 Memo from F. Petrone to S. Speck re. scheduling of exercise. &Ledca.: c; 104. 11/1/85 Memo from F. Petrone to S. Speck re. scheduling of exerelse (different from 103 above). g, g g cc 105. 11/6/85 Proposed wind directions for periods of radioactive material release, by J. Sgy.c#cd'.n g'c.i.m Keller. 106. 10/29/85 letter from S. Speck to E. Markey options for exerelse. j % n h w -+ 107. 10/29/85 letter from S. Speck to W. Dircks re. options for exercise. fhaica16 108. 10/29/85 Questions & Answers on Shoreham (Revision 5 + Exercise),11 questions [m,'cccr./ and answers. 109. 10/25/85 Memo from R.E. to R. Wilkerson re. estimate of staff days to develop the exercise objectives, j,'hCM -4 110. 10/18/85 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board decision on LILCO appeal. j'ff); - f/[,u: .n c :-M cu Notebook #7,1 of 9 4/21/86 Letter 'from E. Tanzman to R. Kowleskt transmitting fif ty (50) copies of 1. the Post Exercise Assessment, final report. rl' ~?cc ec:ci 4/15/86 Letter from M. Langs Supervisor, Town of Southampton, NY re. FEMA 2. Evaluation of LILCO Off-Site Emergency Plan, pb kccza 4/15/86 Memo for all FEMA employees from J.W. Becton Jr. re. Ass!gnment of 3. Acting Regional Director Region,II, New York. j.'. i.m.a. w 4. 4/18/86 Memo from R.W. Krlmm, FEMA Headquarters to E.L. Jordan, NRC re. transmittal of the Post Exercise Assessment report, f,'de ~u c c, 5. 4/17/96 Memo from N. Stelnlauf. FEMA Region !! Acting Regional Director to 8.W. Speck, Assoelate Director State and Local Programs and Support re. Assessment Report. transmittal of the Post Exeycise,4 @ f <fx-6. 4/17/86 Post Exercise Assessme,nt Repor.t for the Shoreham exercise. ../.4sccc:u 4/17/86 Letter from E. Tanzman to R. Kowleskt transmitting fifty (50) copies of 7. the Post Exercise. dc 4*ca[~ 4/17/86 Letter from P. Meloy, FEMA Headquarters to R. Brand, Long Island 8. Newsday re. request for personal Interview with J. Beeton, Jr.

, mmc.

L.

N 9. 4/16/86 handwritten note from M. Jackson to R. Kowleski re. EBS messages reviewed. p />y efcej'& L: [t o.1 <.

10. 4/15/86 Memo to File from R. Kowleski re. Shoreham Post Exercise Assessment.

chc.<./ea h d:..%<

11. 4/14/86 Letter from E. Petrone to J.W. Becton, Jr. re. resignation as Region !!

Regional Director. }.'[w.L'u.c.: c.f

12. 4/11/86 Handwritten memo from C. Amato/D. Vito, NRC Region I to R. Kowlesk!

re. Presumed LERO Deficiency 6 g g f. gg Notebook #7 een't.,2 of 9

13. 4/7/86 Memo fro F.P. Petrone from M. Jackson re. Telephone conversation with Leon' Campo on 4/4/86.

/ ggeg

14. 4/8/8C Memo for R. Rowleski from M. Jackson re. comments on Shoreham Draft Post Exercise Report. r g r.c.7 %.7 y f M CA. a 15, 4/7/86 Memo from R.S. Wilkerson to R. Kowleski re. Redundant Route Alerting.

n~c.: M :

,:.c. w1< : e

16. 4/9/86 Draft memo for S.W. Speck from F.P. Petrone re. Shoreham Post Exercise Assessment report.

.31 cf.,f 7 v,dcZ c ew

17. 4/2/86 R. Kowleski, Telephone conversation notes re. Exercise report with T.

gc def fc.r;tC ctw l Baldwin.

18. No date T. Baldwin, telephone conversation notes re. Exercise report with E.

g f,ce ec.' 3,d c,' a_.g Tanzman. r

19. 3/27/86 Letter from A.M. D'Amato to J.W. Beeton, Jr. re. public meeting concerning the Shoreham exercise. 7./gCa.,c;./

20. 3/24/86 Handwritten note from P. McIntire to R. Kowleski re. F. Petrone's reque for language to be added to Shoreham exercise report.

1 <pu:ec.; 7c iA-co x

21. 4/4/86 Letter from E. Tanzman to R. Kowleski sending Sections 3 and 4 of the draft Exeretse report with copy to M. Lawless from T. Baldwin.

b q p G D tf f* /.c V 4-<-c. \\ /

22. 4/3/86 Letter from E. Tanznian to R. Kowleski transmitting five (5) copfes of draft Shoreham exercise report dated April 7,198f.

i .a y g it c.: 4 u c ( s t' ( v 8 ^r & g, * - l l

13. 4/1/86 Letter from T.T. Martin, NRC Region I to J.D. Leonard, Long Island l

Lighting Co. re. Inspection of emergency preparedness activities February 12-14, ) 1986: Inspection No. 50-322/86-02. - 2 gc[c q s&pe i-h l

1 I t. Notebook 07 eon't.,3 of 9 S40,.[ 3/26/86 ASLAB decision. ,(J2/13 N'7_,A/{,>w-t 24.

25. 3/19/86 Letter from J.H. Keller to R. Kowleski re. comments on the draft Shoreham exere!se report. g f g fq, />,juh

/

26. 3/17/86 Letter (carbon) from S.W. Speck to S.J. Raven, SUNY. Stony Brook, NY-re. request for Shoreham documents. f) 4 ceff

27. 3/17/86 (glock receipt date) letter (carbon) from S.W. Speck to M. Smollin re.

Shoreham exercise.

$gcc.ctcf

28. 3/14/86 Memo from R. Kowleskt to Region II RAC and contractors re. request for review of draft Shoreham exe reg jf gg-

29. 3/12/86 Letter from E. Tanzman to R. Kowleski re. transmittal of twenty (20) copies of the draf t Shoreham exercise report dated March 12,&%, "W 1986.

jX Q cc. d te,c R J a.

30. 3/13/86 Letter from E. Tanzman to R. Kowieski transmitting twenty (20) copies of ort dated March 12,1986.

Sections 3 and 4 of the draft Shoreham exercise rep &&t" =? f%cdw&~ c#mt tv

31. 3/14/86 Memo from R. Rowleski to R.S. Wilkerson re. Shoreham Exercise -

communications. g cret/ h jQ,. h y b

32. 2/14/86 Letter from C.A. Gamble, The Inn at Medford to R. Kowleski re.

Hotel / meeting room arrangements for the Shoreham exercise. j$te:Lacsci

33. 3/17/86 Handwritten memo from R. Turner to R. Kowleskt re. letter sent to the White House. /-M eaf

34. 3/6/86 Letter from S.M. Glass to K.J. Letsche response to letter dated 2/20/86 requesting documents pertaining to Shoreham exercise.

/ 'M- ,p *,? p. lac.scf _ g L t '+ Notebook #7 eon't.,4 of 9

35. 3/3/86 Letter from R. Donovan to R. Rowleski re. Shoreham exercise Information, free play messages, timeline, c.ontroller and simulator logs.

uMu/ g m c. ZATN &~ he', 7, ?.. ll ptel.acc4 m s

36. 2/27/86 Letter from S.W. Speck to M.S. Holt, U.S. House of Representatives, re.

Shoreham exercise. gg/ 37, 2/21/86 Letter from G.J. Blass, Suffolk County to F. Petrone re. meeting regarding'the Shoreham exerelse. r (,cvud.e. cssy 38. R. Rowleski's draft hig ghts comments for pub!!c befefing 2/15/86. p es fe K.c~w e fu/ //f/2] e ..-,_,.-g---. 9 g -.w., w--

N /

39. Shoreham Exercise Evaluators Attendance List.

p?. W/.u-cea

40. 2/12/86 Shoreham Press Conference Attendance List.

W.- c4 CC. C'

41. Shoreha'm Exeretse observers es A,tte,ndance List.

42, 2/13/86 FEMA Evaluafor/LE O salgnments, Shoreham Exercise. 43. R. Kowleski handwritten notes re. Shoreham, Exercise Evaluator Briefing /Tralning. d.6)t<.dd1"U W cr f4c-xduc.%

44. 2/10/86 Letter from C.A. Daverlo, LILCO to R. Kowleski re. telephone numbers and addresses for Shoreham Exercise.

/7/W W

45. 2/7/86 Letter from R. Kowleski to C.A. Daverlo, LILCO re. Federal evaluators, observers, controllers, simulators for Shoreham exercise.

Cbye.M fs4 4 m*

46. 2/7/86 Letter from R. Kowleski to D. Schweller, U.S. DOE re. location assignments to DOE facilities for the,Shoreham exerelse.

fit.nwecd Notebook #7 con't.,5 of 9

47. 2/10/86 Media Advisory re. Press Briefing by F.P. Petrone regarding Shoreham

exercise, fher.(ce.c.cef

48. 2/12/86 Speaking Points for F.P.Jetrone press briefing.

f.~t.ctCu-cce,

49. 2/3/86 Memo from R.W. Donovan to R. Kowleskt re. Shoreham Exercise -

gf,e.M A fMCa-g o 7 eMa#, February 13,1986. 7

30. 2/12/86 Letter from S.W. Speck to V. Stello, Jr. re. review of Rev!alon 6 of the LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham. j),g ' g g

51, 2/12/86 Letter from T.L. Harpster, NRC Region I to R. Kowleski re. review of Revision 6 of the LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham. / % ra cc w_i

52. 2/10/86 Memo from R. Kowleski to M. Sanders re. Shoreham Draft Exercise ef p y c A f -/o f.c,C N n A M e< h

/ Control Plan.

83. 2/4/86 Letter from J.H. Keller to R.B. Kowleski re. Revised Data for the Shoreham Exercise. c6

c. fee 4* 7'd 4.e [.m c1 /4,.e M%,_,

7

54. 2/3/86 Memo from R.B. Kowleski to all Federal Observers re. Briefing -

/ i~ M *' "7 /8'e*<l<.u-FM 8 Shoreham Exercise. O pf.4

55. Information regarding dates and tasues leading to the Shoreham exerelse.,

c6 * '* d

• M

(? q /2 !$2'

?.

56. 2/3/86 Memo from R. Kowleski to all REP Evaluators re. Shoreham REP Exere!se

- February 13,1986 transmitting evaluator packets. p,,,,,q,, y,,f

57. No Date Memo from R. Kowleski to all REP Observers, Controllers / Simulators re.

lodging and travel arrangements for Shoreham exerelse. g,e,4cg

58. 1/22/86 Letter from C.A. Daverlo to R. Kowleski re. response to Letters dat,ed 1/8/46 and 1/10/86; and FEMA /LILCO meeting 1/16/86. 6 djec.r-/ /b r. _. erg '>

( \\ ed wA w, t Notebook #7 con't.,6 of 9

59. 1/30/86 Information for LERO workers.

Ste:6a CC#

60. 1/22/86 Letter from C.A. Daverlo, LILCO to R. Kowleskt re. response to LILCO/ FEMA meeting 1/16/86 and Shoreham pointa of Observer Review

._ s y ?sh gMw document.

61. Telephon'a and RadloL Directory for Federal Evaluators, Controllers and Simulators

.during February 13, 1986 Shoreham exercisc., 4 f tc.4"acco

62. Directions to FEMA Command Post.,

e pte-6 us: u

63. 2/6/86 Memo from F.P. Petrone to S.W. Speck re. transmittal of FEMA Revfew of the LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham, Revision 6. j Q u

64. 1/22/86 Memo from S.W. Speck to F. Petrone re. Request for FEMA Region II to review Revision VI of the LILCO Trans!tton Plan (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station).

,/ f ::.-A.ccuf

65. Correspondence between Kirkpatr!ck and Lockhart and Huston and Williams dated as follows:

p-t,pm.!wd.E 't A c* I- 3 gg 1/20/86 1/27/86 s

86. 1/31/86 Letter from R.K. Willard, U.S. DOJ to G. Blass, Suffolk County re.

Shoreham exercise. ]'9a._cc.

87. 1/30/86 Letter from G. Blass Suffolk County to R.K. Willard U.S. DOJ re.

Shcreham Ixercise., t.3 g m

68. 2/5/86 Memo from R.W. Krlmm to R.B. Kowleskt re. FEMA Headquarters Attendees at the Shoreham Exercise.

l1 ! ctu 'cc e< f l$

69. 2/5/86 Memo from S.W. Speck to W.F.W. Jones re. Travel Exemption Request for i

Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise. Notebook #7 een't.,7 of 9

70. 1/29/8hLetter from R.B. Kowleski to C.A. Daverlo. LILCO re. Final Exercise Objectives for the 1986 Shoreham Exercise. g c y':</'re f;d. 'T/c....

71. Suffolk County New York and Peter P. Cohalan V. United States of America civil action for. declaratory and injunctive relief. fj e rg nia.c.cc.f

pM kr e.o '

72. 1/29/85 Memo from F.P. Petrone to R.L. Vickers, TEMA Region IX re. Request for Region IX Support for February 13, 1986 Shoreham REP Exercise.

f L<rsoc. c.J

73. 1/28/85 Letter from K.J. Letsche to S.M. Glass re. meetings on 1/29/86 and drill 1/30/86.

4, y g.-/ctdr s,c A cc s ft ' te.

74. 1/28/85 Memo from S.M. Glass to R.B. Kowleski re. Shoreham Exercise.

, -l;.J uy a' p * *! ) : ~ < ~c <.e.:

75. 1/23/85 Letter from R.K. Willard, U.S. DOJ to P.F. Cohalen re. Shoreham f,r,,&ccce!

exercise.

76. 1/28/85 Memo from F.P. Petrone to H.G. Vickers, FEMA Region I re. Request for Region 1 Support for February 13,1986 Shoreham REP Exercise.

r.r...n s ec a

77. Maps of Exercise evaluation locations for Federal evaluators.

c-nyechJ -6 q-:.r4 .c fin.

78. 1/24/86 Memo from F.P. Petrone to P. Giordano, FEMA Region !!! re. Requet for Region !!! Support for February 13 1986 Shoreham REP Exercise.

p / ? Ls-* G M

79. 1/27/86 Letter from R.L. Acerno.to T. Kilcoyne, Manager The Inn at Medford re.

Federal observers staying at hotel. (. < L.r.-D.ucc c ; Notebook #7 een't.,8 of 9

80. 1/27/86 letter from K.J. Letsche to S.M. Glass re. d-lli scheduled for 1/30/86.

y c? f x La w / - /C + L l'LCcd. w.

81. Rad!ation Emergency Med! cal Drill Scenarlos Shoreham Nuclear Station'/ Control Suffolk Hospital. p,, f j.%da.cc<.f_,yJAc[:.M/.. id. - 7, hmc =. -

82. 1/27/86 U.S.

Courthouse Uniondale, Long Island, New York Transcript of proceedings Long Island Lighting Company vs. The County of Suffolk, New York d and P. Cohalan. //. i; terOcce.eJ cs ag S g c c.,., f,

83. 1/23/86 Letter from R.K. Willard US DOJ to P.F. Cohalan re. Shoreham exercise.

l',' d ac= S fye t'f '[]/ O

N t- [

84. L!st of Procedures for the LILCO' Transition plan for Shoreham with handwritten note by R. Kowleskt re. contact with B. Aidikaff, Adikoff Assoc.

Wjcc/M.*% : ::-:-c

85. -1/22/86 Letter from H.H.E. Plaine, NRC and G.W. Watson, FEMA to P.F. Cohsten re. Shoreham exercise and Suffolk County. Law 2-86.

ys&-w S - ps a D. c w ",,~~ R r 1/27/86 Telefax front B. Weiss, NRC to r. Ko'wleski with list of Shoreham Exercise 88. Controllers. f A.c lu c & l

87. 1/17/86 Memo from P. Lutz DOT to FEMA Region 2 RAC Chairman re. Coast Guard participation in the Shoreham exercise.powC %

CQw 72

88. 12/24/86 Memo from P. McIntire to R.F. Jones re. Request of Per Diem Exemption for Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant Exerelse. g.e.,-f u; e,

89. 1/30/85 Memo from F.P. Petrone to J.W. Becton, Jr., re. Exemption on use of FIA's FTE Personnel for Region ll's REP Program.gge,f,cf Notebook #7 con't.,9 of 9

90. 1/22/86 Letter from S.J. Reaven, SUNY 8 tony Brook to S.W. Speck re. thank you to response for documents with request for specific documents..

., c

91. 12/3/85 letter from M.B. Ashare, Suffolk County to S.W. Speck re. Shoreham

~ Exercise process. [, y e m

92. Portions of Revision 6 of the LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham, f,y-ci.u = -

93. 1/28/86 Final Exercise Objectives for)he 1986 Shoreham Exercise.

c,l,. p c: 4 6 H f6Gn C l l

94. 1/10/86 letter from R.B. Rowleski to C.A. Daverlo, ts. Shoreham Exercise

~ l Scenario (revised), dated January,6,1986..- G efc'sc.J 79 lL't. Un-<.c

95. 1/3/86 Letter froiE.J. Markey to.J.W. Beeton, Jr., re. Shoreham exercise.

l % C. u n

94. 12/20/86 Letter from E.J. Markey to J.W. Beeton, Jr. re. Theodore Berry and t

[,h-d'a.c.c.c,7 Associates.

97. Date illegible, letter from J.M. Melody GAO to R. Udell, U.S. House of Representatives re. Theodore Berry and Associates.

( f't!.c. ;t.u.cc.,.p

98. FEMA Task schedule for Shoreha,m Exerelse.

p L nm..u.:

99. Handwritten Chronology.

fa. 6a CFW s f%<f W*f 2 / l

.~ )* i Kdlobook#8,1of1 4 x s

1. '8/19/86 - Resolution passed by Board of Edvention of Comsewogue School District

),,,[c e c, J

,J on 8/18/86. ~ 2. 6/24/86 - EL. note to P. McIntire re. Plan revision pages. ~ ,6w.f.ccc.zca 1 3. 6/20/86 - LILCO response to NRC re. P,EA. y A <.-t 'A J 4. 5/86 - A,ttachment 1. Long Island L!ghting Company Local Emergency Response Organization Traffic Control Tabletop Drill V Rev. O. t,) 9 c-< /<-<.5 p,Z L c - 4 :'a f,in-au c Y '.

5., Dispatch of General Population Buses from the Patchogue Staging Area During the February,13 Exercise 4 /.ULW e'. /"dr.'"t.c

/- p yc:-rce - ~ 2/13/86 - Five documents logging axerdse.. r 6. ('A.e-w a e n d s6 d

• b~-

~ 7. 6/20/06 - Revision 7 of Local.Offsite Radiological Emer[ency Response Plan. 0 a e:c u c ch q 8. 6/3/83 - Correspondence from S. Speck to Town of Riverhead. .r' G e + '~-c u - s 9. 6/6/86 - NRC Memorandum and Ort'er. 1.-se A.-- f ~ r / g3 _,, ,eg,j-

10. S/21/88 - Lettdr transmitting PEA.

f %2 cxk u P'.S

11. 5/20/86 - Rocky Point School District Resolution.

l-% Gca c-

12. 6/20/86 - Letter from R. Krimm to Y.,Pufahl, GAO, transmitting documents.

s jhr.4ccccc< l

13. 5/2/86 - E. Tanzman prepared catalogue of exercise document files given by LERO participants at LERO EOC to. FEMA.evalust,pra f t f.f '.

,f, a,.- f'st n u tc a r C.) -. n,- l

14. 5/19/66 - Letter from S. Speck to Town of Southampton re. FEM A procedures.

l j % -g., w s u 15, 4/21/86 - Letter from S. Perry to Suffolk County Legislature re. holding a public ' heatinq. j~ %.nGruG 1G.' 4/18/86 - Statement by.C. Amato, NRC Region 1. j.'sv :hLes V

17. 4/21/86 - Letter from S. Perry to Palomino re. holding a public hearing.

f V.z u.c c-e. 4/11/86 - Letter from Palomino to Beeton re. holding a public hearing. x 13. f %.r:.I u C. U

19. 4/15/86 - Letter from Suffolk County Legislature to Becton re. FEMA's approach.

i "s iM.,sj-zoG

20. 4/21/86 - Letter from S. Perry to A. D'Amato re. publia hearing.

21. 5/21/86 - Letter from S. Ferry to T. Downey re. public hearing.

df /M cccul hf c

summmmmmemummy ) l

22. 4/15/88 - Letter from R. Mrazek and T. Downey re. public hearings.

j%-hsc=c

23. 4/18/86 - Memo from R. Krimm to E. Jorden,.NRC transmitting PEA.

,g,...... 24. Transcript of J. Beet n testimony before Markey hearing. &nN ' ,y r. ric.a ct - f. i Box 1 1. the original cover memorandum from RK to all REP evaluators at the Shoreham exercise enclosing the pre-exercise matef,c.le-(dated Februazy 3,fcu< );f:k, la 1986 C b p.sc./ t v,. .A 4-g zofm 2. the original Attachment #7 to the evaluator packet, wh!ch is a memorandum from RK to all REP evaluators, controllers, and simulators discussing transportation and hotel arrangements (dqted January 22,1986): j'/Lt?.S L'<<-c3 3. the original cover memorandum from RK to FEMA Region !! controllers and simulators enclosing the FEMA Reg,lon !! Controller and Simulator Plan (dated February 3,1986): p (, p d.rei,T,J,c i. 4 4 -< rp pJ,-. 0.. e p ~ ~ 4. the original table entitled "Shoreham Implementing Procedures" listing wh!ch evaluators were to receive copies of the various sections of LERO Procedures that were provided to thentas part of thejr pre-exercise materials (undated); and j$L eq, a ':c "y d ' ice 5. the original typed copy of a set of vu-graphs concerning REP which were prepared during RK's visit to Argonna National Labora,tery early in February (l und 6. RK's personal copy of 4/7/86 PEA draft. r $;ggep p gw-s : j t e:L M g L~ 7. 2 additional copies of 4/7/86 PEA dr 4'%,, f.' ? -- e c ~~" - f. 2 additional copies of 3/12/86 PEA draft. gf.g.<.,yggyb /c Cem - I E ' w ' ' 8. / 2. Original revised copy of 3/12/86.. PEA draft per T. Baldwin, this is consolidated I copy. G'4 u % f M )$C W V yl w$n Y'4m. n l

10. Original Exercise Evaluation Critique Forms v

g ga p. 4.' r e C ' c. cm. Box 2 1.

5. Macintosh review of 3/12/86 PEA draft.

C&;e em fWm n *qg.d.C,. 2. P. Weberg review of 3/12/86 PEA draft. ~ S ) y ;9 (deLu-w-c' h Y" \\ 3. P. McIntire review of 3/12/86 PEA draft. /. O J ;< M' " C "" ^ ' ; g.%.% ~ i ltrebteMe J. Connolly review of 3/12/86 PEA draft. u-v t1 4. eye ;.w-N

5. M. Lawless review of 3/12/86 PEA. draft. g j. 4. g f gu (L U. O w C f ' ' m ". ' 'a 6.' 1 page draft 3/12/86 of Table 2.1 EBS and Siren Events Timelitte. ~ cbp( f & />f.4.&w et jh.c:.&x.:n m 7. H. Fish review of 3/12/86, PEA draft. y..yc.t n>,. M,..4-m n (^. " '. -' ' ' " ' ' o (f 4. t* t b i L A N,*A *'-* <C"' V,,7 'c v. f L.. 8. R. Bernack! review of 3/12/86 PEA draft. r. %c.cf 9'c 'L6^/~, &M 0 ,,r, t c.-Ive T* < '- 9. Bob T. review of 3/12/86 PEA draf t. ~ i f-St.c :(_c.w' N-%

10. RFR rev'lew of 3/12/86 PEA dra'ft.,

l;t;c.c;l'~ b. 'f % &*C p t

11. 3 sets of document-draft 4/7/1986 (T, ables.to. PEA), one set says.by Roger K.

tfpc.I'; v -L' 6&ew.c#t [ -:. n a c-c n.

12. Letter from P. Giardina to R.X., dated 3/20/85 on draft PEA.

y * ~t1.4w *h ~ Cbf -t v &s w e J

13. Letter from D. Connors to R.K., dated 3/3/86.on plan changes.

& y e.s'- @,r_ ' C.C w m y.' "x-u t- '~~'%

14. Letter from G. Blekerto'n to R.X. dated 3/17/86 on draft PEA.

.~.>,, &. u - A.,,p.ceu c:,-W ' '

15. Memo to AriL Shoreham Evaluators from E. Tanzman, dated 3/17.86 to review

,, g 'hc 5., draft PEA. .p-g g [g,.< g c) g Unidentified marked up copy of 3/12/86 PEA draft. 16. p i.y.c r r's,,LCt.c.uc. C'1 lY **/ .. r

• ~ ', ' ' ~

17. Bob T. review of 4/7/86 PEA draft.

g~fy_ c.f-p g,tA A.t.c CI (#* " C.c*. f. 18. M. Jackson review of 4/7/86 PEA draft.. C pje c.7.'*D.N'*w'W -y j._,... t 19.. 3 unidentified marked up copies of 4/7/86 PEA draft. j. y y a,a ?>, J'.r:u.:< t. ( Box 3 7 1. Speelal Population maps. f j'p>;,.+,"o, n: -- '.. f . - ~ 2. Stren Rte. Alerting Maps. l s '. s we a .z. m.1, 3. Material for Observer Packages. bN ' 4. Bus Routes not selected for free play. ' p 9,v -fa U 'E ? , t g...rg.jef. ken :, 4,g.C o '. l, / r.: _ f.~ 5. Transfer Point Maps. i 8. t'GP Maps' / _/ ,q/,' ffune.h'.0/ CfW.' ".

s. Stren unp..

/

w" - -

/>y /f N 1 l u

? .- 8..EPZ Survey Maps. 2 9. Other bus route packet. )

10. SNPS Local Offatte Radiological Emergency Response Plan.

11. Originals of Some Exercise Evaluator Critique Forms (blank).

J. . / ~e 4, gg (f, ~

• 2 Y

.(_ s 1 a c c w.> .i,- A )/ C{(;,'. + n l' > o i. - ( ~

t. V.; '%&

Qf ,.a g g._ e. . =. p..: ,?.-- e '.s',)_s,* lf L 'Lo f* .A,,., g( ( a ?nsi ^p fy M & 2 /

Additional Mleeellaneous information on file at FEMA Region H l Patchoque Staging Area Driving Instructions (. Bus / Van Dispatchin'g Form - 2 originals I[dl Bus Driver Procedure OPIP 3.8 4 l 17 ,..t [ EmerTency Workers Traveling Instructions to the Emergency Worker Decontamination Facility at Brentwood j Emergency Worker Dose Record Form ' Scenario No. 8 (Rev. 2)-( c M /k--[c~<. $ ' /b. '^< 4 ~ Originals of scenerlo and radiological slides used at evaluator. training (J. Keller, INEL has these). f,pv.% @Cmd.- em,,.tc l[.cet. The following documents stored in " magazine holder

• 1.

2/12/88 - LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 8,. FEMA Review, dated 2/7/88. $ t,-:/w 2. 3/15/84 letter from S. Speck to W. Dircks re. FEMA findings on LILCO Transition Plan... j'.Qr:Lw' 3. 2/29/84 - memo from F. Petrone to S. Speck re. revised pages of RAC Review. g%por% st

• Jw e1 ja '..:-ds c.D'e.

4. Chronology of Shoreham material from 5/9/83 through 5/17/84. t , d', ( 8. RAC Review of LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham, Revision 3.. transmitted by .. " ' C d,' memo from F. Petrone to S. Speck,2/21/8% (".. N W.,X l ' s '- 8. RAC Review of LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham, Revision 4, transmitted from h'q;;'g j F. Petrone to S. Speck on 10/15/84 and from S. Speck to W. Dircks on 11/15/84. I 7. Findings on the LILCO Transition Plan as Requested by the NRC as Part of the 1 NRC Licensing of the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, transmitted from R. w Erlmm to E. Jordan,8/23/83. ~ 3 8. RAC Review of LILCO Transition Plan, Revision 5 for Shoreham transmitted from F. Petrone to S. Speck on 9/24/85 and from 8. Speck to W. Dircks on 10/8/85. Oknf 7'r f U 2< c,h-Su-Ghe 20 d 1/ ff U

N l l l Copy of Material Produced 5/6/86 [ff,f cg /.' * [ ' { ;' Letter from 5.M. Glass to K. Letsche dated 5/6/86. p t' ' c ' ~ 2/3/86 memo from R.B. Kowleski and R.W. Donovan to FEMi Region !! Controllers and Simulators rei Shoreham exercise - February 13,1986. f sj e c.(d 7t., M c' o w c, /1 n " de, j Controller and Simulator Plan for the Shoreham Exercise of February 13,1986. ;- ,S.' A 4 h e., ) c cs'1'c M ' m ) Copy of Material Produced.7/7/86 e,, Letter from KM. Glass to K.J. Letsche dated 7/7/86. - W * / /~-g ~ Letter of February 3,1986 from Kowleski to REP Evaluatorsf/ tit: A Itinerary for the Shoreham Exercise [/x&ce.<./ FEMA Region 11 Control Organization & Management Plan.[i.d c 'C Shoreham Exercise Evaluator Organization gr,/ Evaluator Assignment / Location Instructions,.] gC.c. c.' s / Exercise Evaluation Critique Form f fg..d,sc- / Maps and Address Directory j.k.- O c cw Memorandum (undated) from Kowleski to REP observers, Controllers / Simulators. fn. :Lu e.c d^ Emergency Classification Timeline,, f.t.s. . w Messages (simulated stren failure, impediment to evacuat!on, TCP, Bus route, evacuation of mobility impaired etc.) j.,' ,j Form to be used with Messages g,'.,.hz,w:' Copy of the following material produced 8/18/86 letter from S.M. Glass to K.J. Letsche dated 8/18/86 - /.h , ((: d#'~~" copies of messages that were Inserted into the exercise - [; i.etuct i 1 \\

)

copies of controller logs

' ', rM G'C-copies of simulator logs. f 3-[ e d I trye2/"f 2i

.-._.#-. 2. - _ ~ _ _ -, _ _. - _ - _ -.

/) $ i DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public He"_Ith Service I Food and Drug Administration, f Rockville MD 20857 ,g.,

• William R. Cunning, T: squire Federal Dnergency Managenent Agency Office of General Counsel 500 C Street, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20472 Re: In tfie Matter of Long Island Lighting Company, Docket No. 50-322-OL-5, Nuclear Regulatory Ccmnission

Dear Mr. Ctaning:

This is a follow-up to your conversation of Novenber 5,1986, with Ms. Anne Snith of my staff. As I understand it, Mr. Ron 'ernacki, the Food and Drug Administration's B (EA) Region II Radiological Health Representative has been noticed for a deposition in connection with the above-entitled matter. This is to fonnally request that you take whatever steps are necessary to quash the Notice of Deposition which is currently scheduled for November 25, 1986, in Washington, D.C. In this connection, it is the policy of EA that, even in those.. instances where authorized, the deposition should take place at the duty station of the FDA employee, in this case, Brooklyn, New York. Further, the policy of FDA respecting whether the agency's enployees may testify in connection with litigation, hearings, etc. to which E A is not a party is set forth at 21 CFR 20.1. Should you be unable to quash the Notice of Deposition respecting Mr. Bernacki, it will be necessary to obtain my authorization for him to testify pursuant to that regulation. If you have any questions on this matter, please contact Ms. Anne Snith at (FPS) 443-3470. Sincerely yours, .i , ', [dofin M. Taylor Associate Cannissioner for Regulatory Affairs

Department of Energy Q. l Washington, DC 20585 November 13, 1986 Spence Perry, Esq. General Counsel Federal Emergency Management Agency 500 'C' Street, S.W. Washington, D.'C. 20472

Dear Mr. Perry:

Pursuant to a telephone conversation between William Cumming of your staff and Mayo Lee of my staff, the Department of Energy (DOE) requests that the Federal Emergency Management Agency represent DOE employees in proceedings related to the exercise of the Shoreham emergency response plan. Yours truly, b y S & <-f! W Jerry Z. Pruzan Deputy General Counsel for Programs l i L

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA- [LKETED NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ui n '86 NOV 19 All128 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD f0C$ibi In the Matter of ) LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-322-OL-5 .s ) (EP Exercise) (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station. ) Unit 1) ) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of " FEMA'S INITIAL RESPONSE TO SUFFOLK COUNTY'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF 00CUMNETS BY THE NRC STAFF AND FEMA" in the above-captioned proceeding have been served on the following by deposit in the United States mall, first class, or by hand delivery as indicated by double asterisk, this 17th day of November, 1986: John H. Frye, III, Chairman Fabian G. Palomino, Esq. Administrative Judge Special Counsel to the Governor Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Executive Chamber U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission State Capitol Washington, D.C. 20555 Albany, NY 12224 Oscar H. Paris W. Taylor Reveley III, Esq. Administrative Judge Hunton & Williams Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 707 East Main Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Sox 1535 Washington, D.C. 20555 Richmond, VA 23212 Frederick J. Shon Jonathan D. Feinberg, Esq. Administrative Judge New York State Department of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Public Service U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Three Empire State Plaza Washington, D.C. 20555 Albany, NY 12223 l t Stephen B. Latham, Esq. John F. Shea, III. Esq. Herbert H.. Brown, Esq.** Twomey, Latnam & Shea Lawrence Coe Lanpher, Esq. Attorneys at Law Karla J. Letsche, Esq. P.O.mBox 398 Kirkpatrick & Lockhart 33 West Second Street 1900 M Street, N.W. Riverhead, NY 11901 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Joel Blun, Esq. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Director, Utility Intervention Washington, D.C. 20555 NY State Consumer Protection Board Suite 1020 . Atomic Safety and Licensing 99 Washington Avenue Appeal Board Panel Albany, NY. 12210 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Dr. Monroe Schneider North Shore Committee P.O. Box 231 Docketing and Service Section Wading River, NY 11792 Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Philip H. McIntire Washington, D.C. 20555 Federal Emergency Management Agency 26 Federal Plaza Spence Perry, Esq.** New York, New York 10278 General Counsel, Rm. 840 Federal Emergency Management Agency 500 C Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20472 Robert Abrams, Esq. Attorney General of the State Gerald C.eCrotty, Esq. of New York Ben Wiles, Esq. Attn: Peter Bienstock, Esq. Counsel to the Governor Department of Law Executive Chamber State of New York State Capitol Two World Trade Center Albany, NY 12224 Room 46-14 l New York, NY 10047 Anthony F Earley, Jr., Esq. MHB Technical Associates General Counsel 1723 Hamilton Avenue Long Island Lighting Company Suite K 250 Old County Road San Jose, CA 95125 Mineola, NY 11501 Hon. Peter Cohalan Martin Bradley Ashare, Esq. Suffolk County Executive Suffolk County Attorney County Executive / Legislative Bldg. H. Lee Dennison Building Veteran's Memorial Highway Veteran's Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Hauppauge, NY 11788 I

e Mr. Jay Dunkleberger Ms. Nora Bredes New York State Energy Office Shoreham Oppenents Coalition Agency Building 2 195 East Main Street Empire State Plaza Smithtown, NY 11787 Albany, New York 12223 Ellen Blackler Mr. Robert Hoffmnan New York State Assembly Ms. Susan Rosenfeld Energy Committee Ms. Sharlene Sherwin 626 Legislative Office Building P.O. Box 1355 Albany, NY 12248 Massapequa, NY 11758 Brookhaven Town Attorney Bernard M. Bordenick, Esq. 475 E. Main. Street Maryland National Bank Building Patchogue, NY 11772 Rm. 9604 Hashington, DC 20555 f

^

Hilliam R. Cumming Federal Emergency Management Agency +w .g. -.+ _%-.-.--y- . - -, -.}}