ML20214C371

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Intervenor Exhibit I-ROREM-215,consisting of 860916 Memo Forwarding Formulated Proposed Plan & Schedule to Complete Comstock Engineering,Inc Backlog of Incompleted Insps
ML20214C371
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/04/1986
From: Dewald I
COMSTOCK ENGINEERING, INC.
To: Marino R
COMSTOCK ENGINEERING, INC.
References
OL-I-ROREM-215, NUDOCS 8705200678
Download: ML20214C371 (33)


Text

'

lNT~ 2)6 WUTB m

T-2/3 o re m.

. c y. g

~~

Comstock Engineering, Inc.

M e m o ra n d u m._, MFI 13 n,8 :,

at

o R. E. Marino off;ce:_ Braidwood To:

j, From:

1. F. DeWald Formulated Proposed Plan and Schedule to Complete

Subject:

Comstock Engineerine's Backlog of Incompleted Inspections Date: Seet eber 16. 191 CONTROL NO:

83-09-16-01 Attached is the Formalized Plan to complete the existing Backlog of Incomplete Inspections as of 8-31-83.

Also included in the plan is the proposed schedule to complete the document review. Not included in this report is the total number of documents rejected for incorrect items on re-inspections that may be required.

This proposed plan is based on an increase in manpower. The present work force cannot keep up with the daily inspection requests from Construction and since 8-1-83 the back log has increased as indicated in the following report.

If there are any questions to the following report please contact me.

Very Respectfully, e11c.e<_

I. T. DeWald Q. C. Manager IFD/dar cc:

W. A. Gardner - w/ attach.

~

QC File - w/ attach.

QC Mgr. file - w/ attach.

MUCLEAR REGULATORY CCMMIS$10N Docket No. S'~Y

~

N O-bM la the matter of Staff IDENTIRED p

hiicart RECEIVED C'

REJECTED Intervenor j

yc l'.P.L L L 137 Cont'g Off'r Contractor DATE Other Wituss A

-I' Reporter 8705200678 861204 PDR ADOCK 05000456 G

PDR

a l

t Pago 1 PROPOSED FORMA 1.IZED PLAN AND SCHEDULE-Incomplete Installation Inspections a,s of 8-31-83 and manhour Item 1 requirements to complete inspections:

No.

Time Required /

Han Hours Area Inspections e

Inspection Required 1.

Hangers A.

Configurations 3677 9

8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> /10 inspections 2942 B.

Welding 4492 9

8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> /10 inspections 3594 2.

Conduit 287 0

8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> /7 inspections 328 e

8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> /8 inspections 2327 3.

Cable Pan 2327 4

Terminations 438 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> /12 inspections 292 5.

Junction Boxes 423 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> /8 inspections 423 6.

Equipment 1875 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> /5 inspections 3000 7.

Rework Requests 858 0

8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> /4 inspections 1716 Total No. Inspections 14.377 Total No. of manhours required to complete inspections 14,622 4

3 III E G t i a s 8

a

.~s

-g

.x

~

Page 2 s

g 1

Daily Inspection Request:., -

Item 2 The following analysis was based on data accumulated and researched from 8-1-83 thru 8-31-83, eight inspection areas were closely v.onitored on a daily basis.

4 Inspection Inspections Incomplete Area Requests Completed Inspections 1.

Hangers A.

Configurations 479 381

}

98 B.

Welding 1010 534 476 2.

Junction Boxes 178 120 58 3.

Equipment 150 26 124 4.

Cable Pan 58 56 2

5.

Conduit 112 112 0

6.

Terminations 211 211 0

7.

CEA's 539 539 0

8.

RWR's 124 46 78 Total 2860 2029 835 A summary of the analysis reveals there were 2860 requests for inspections, 2029 inspections performed and an accumulation of 83,.5 incompleted inspectiens for the month of August. This indicates that the present work force cannot keep up with construction and have inspections performed in a timely manner.

e f

i i

l I

HP.000139

,. - - - -..., - -, - -,, -, _ _. _,. -,., _.. -,,,,, - - - -,.,. ~,, - - -..,.., -. _,..

s

'e Estimato of roccerch acnhours nacaccory for rcvisv of chsckliets Item 3 1

to determine what inspections /re-inspections,are needed for traceability I,

of checklists:.

No. of No. of Time Spent No. of Estimated Checklists Checklists To Checklists Manhours J

Area to Review Reviewed Review to Review Required j

\\

1.

Hangers A.

Configurations ***

1,462 9,188 1173 1,462 225 B.

Weldin g* * *

  • 20,183 4,331 228 15,852 845

~

2.

Conduit **

818 208 32 126 3.

Cable Pan **

3,395 208 32 522 4.

CEA 's ** * *

  • 11,878 1,204 96 10,674 854 5.

Terminations **'

4,045 208 32 622 6.

Junction Boxes **

1,715 208 32 264 i

l 7.

Equipment ***

83 52 8

13 8.

Penetrations ***

56 52 8

9 9.

Cable Pulling

  • 2,496 2,496 N/A 0

0

)

Total Number of Estimated Manhours Required 6,908 Checklists have been reviewed 1

I Estimated manhours based on 4 inspectors /8 hours /52 checklists each.

Estimated manhours. based on 1 inspector 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> /52 checklists.

Adjusted manhours based on 2 inspectors /8 hours /150 checklists.

          • Adjusted manhours based on 1 inspector /8 hours /100 checklists.

NOTE:

A.

This initial manhour estimate for the checklist backlog review is based on the number of hanger. configuration checklists (4) inspectors performed 1

in an eight (8) hour period. The configuration checklist review is an in depth review due to the necessary cross referencing required to ensure J

traceability of the checklist.

B.

The initial estimated figure of the number (1) inspector can perform due to the amount of research required should increase, as indicated in velding, and CEA's.

l HHGue140 4

e 1

Wege 6 -

~*

It em 1, 2, rnd 3 Summetien g

Item #1 Based on data accumulated and researched from 8-1-83 thru 8-31-83, eight inspection areas were monitored, daily inspection Inspection Requests, inspections completed, and incompleted daily inspections, an average time required to perform inspections was established.

Item #2 Daily inspections were monitored in eight inspection areas on a daily basis, the analysis revealed there were 2,860 requests received, 2,029 inspections performed and a rapid. increase in the incompleted inspections already existing for the month of August, 835 incomplete inspections were added to the list.

Item #3 A review of the number of checklists that one (1) inspector could review, per day, was conducted. The area of configurations was being reviewed at the time, an average of 52 checklists could be completed at that time. Since then the 4 inspectors have been split up into various inspection checklist disciplines resulting in a more timely completion for the review.

9 I;P.0LT141 9

0 l

Page 5 Personnel Responsible Attachment Title Q. C. Manager C

Weekly Inspection Status

, C-1 Daily Documentation Review Weekly Status E-1 Weekly Backlog Documentation Completion Schedule D-1 (Proposed)

Incomplete Inspection

  • Completion Status Assistant Q. C. Manager B

Combined Inspection Status B-1 Daily Inspection Status Report D (Proposed)

Incomplete Inspection Completion Schedule E

Overall Weekly Backlog Documentation Status E-2 Backlog Documentation Review Completion Schedule O

F HP.LGC 142 1

a

Page 6 Item #4 As indicated on Attachment A of this formalized Plan and schedule.

Q. C. personnel have been assigned specific activities no later than 8-1-83, although changes have been effected since and as of 9-06-83 new assignments have been established. Based on the number of Q. C. personnel utilized to maintain daily inspections as of 9-06-83, (6) six personnel are assigned to daily inspection check-list and document review, (26) twenty-six individuals are tentatively assigned to daily inspections. In the event daily inspection require--

ments indicated limited coverage, the remaining personnel shall be assigned to the incompleted inspections.

4 Four (4) individuals are assigned to areas other than daily inspections, (1) one in welder qualifications and (3) three in Inspector re-inspection,

program.

Schedule for Reporting Progress and Status of Current e

Item f5 QC Daily and Incompleted Inspections Site QC Management personnel shall be responsible for maintaining the attachments previously mentioned. Proper use of these attach-m'ents will indicate the progress / status of QC daily inspection activitiles.

Reportina of Weekly Inspection Activities, checklist Review and Item #6 Incompleted Inspection Activities.

Utilizing the attachments C and C-1 the QC Manager will tabulate the total number of inspections, reinspections, checklist reviews and incompleted inspections accomplished for the week. These attach-ments shall be submitted on a weekly basis to CEI's QA. Department.

Plan to Factor Turnover Priorities into the Inspection and Item #7 Re-inspection Schedule To be e,stablished af ter turnover procedure developed.

. i t

e EY.Coc143

. _. ~ _ _..

Pcge 7

\\

Plan and Schedule to eliminate the number of backlog documents Ices #8 avatting review and filing.

Five (5) personnel are assigned to the QC records area to review backlog documents, one (1) person shall be assigned to review incoming documents.

Based on the number of documents reviewed, per individual, in an (8) eight hour day, the following plan and schedule has been established to eliminate backlog documents, maintain review of incoming documents and indicate a com-plation date of backlog documentation.

Attachment E will be maintained by the QC records group to indicate daily number of backlog documents reviewed. Attachment E-1 will be maintained to indicate the overall weekly backlog documentation completion schedule. The Overall Weekly Backlog Documentation Status Report will be submitted to CEI's QA Department on l

a weekly basis. This attachment will indicate progress and status towards total completion of all backlog documents.

i The Backlog Documentation Completion Schedule, Attachment E, will be maintained and posted in the QC records area by the QC Records Coordinator.

Of the six (6) personnel performing technical review of QC records, a minimum of two (2) personnel will be assigned to review daily incoming documents so that 100; coverage is achieved and present backlog is not increased. The remaining four (4) personnel vill concentrate solely on reviewing the present backlog doc-unents so that the schedule completion date, as shown, on Attachment E-2 is set.

]

Turnover priority documents shall be reviewed as soon as they are available so that no delay in the turnover effort occurs.

Item #9 As previously defined in item f 5 of the Formalized Plan and Schedule, the use of Attachments B thru B-1 vill indicate the status of current and ongoing inspection activities. These ' attachments will be maintained by the QC Hansger and posted in the QC area for quick reference and use. These attachments maintained on a day to day basis will alert Management as to which areas require special attention and allow better scheduling and assignments of QC personnel as indicated on Attachment A.

I HP.i,0: 144 1

l

r*." ".* P MCEWAY m

_ m.4

t. =.c e 9-r

=

e.

Soberek1 3g g

s

?.

.: :g~

C J

i e

e rs y E,

e

~

EQU1F.

l

.a.

=

F. Relan

,g 3

C.

.I.

'E i

E e

E..

O 2

a.

.- I' F CAB 1.E

'I gi I

a r *E s.

4.t.chn.c I

5,.

TE RMS.

.s e.

P a

N.11mble 9

5R

! =

=.s.:11 e.= v ga a

,1 J

O

P,

=

r s

t conFTc.

J. Ett

~

e I

""3 8I 4

t as o o WELDING en O

~ *kh.h

~

a*

M.Elechka n

S e.

en j

T"4 4

wP 4

E

[.

uc.& CAL.

g gg t

j l

j k

lih i I

CIA'S

'S l

C a

l g

L.Faillipb w

,t

. J:.

p a

J.

s 4,

4..:

wEg.

.r- - r-

,;.y

m. Wicks l

l e

  • d I
  • ?.m

)

I

...>*h E

c

.C h o

'w o

I

. pa A

>x h

b

.i

  • W.'
  • g.
  1. =

p{

a.

I gg w

EeR

.S R.

S>

, 2?..z

.p 9

  • 1'

.E 5

m s

e a

LEADS TUmous g

(oFIN) l j

3 o.

RECDRDS/

5 FROCEDURES g

S.3rewn

,w g

  • j m

I O?

.2 2

l

.r n

l.

."." g[

DOCUMENTATIC4 l

.x.n z.a.en S. Browe

.c a w e r

- r. > <r l

.e 0. 3 a.

s a

8 I

i HRCCC145 4

g 5

8

..V.. J.T.7.AI D Y IJ.V 6*

l*

T

~M

~

w e,-


v

--m

-,-m-

.;giii iii..

iiii i

i i

i

///////////////////7

~

~

  • 2 / /////

//// ///// /////

3? / / / / //////

//////////:

J""

/// /// ////

/////

/////

~2 //////////

//////7//A 12rM3T 2 ///////////////////N

~

_-==

t

///////////////

/////

  • ~

.# /////

/////

/////

////

/

ig-

~; /////

/////

/////

/////

_""///// ///// ///// ////A

//////////

//////////

///// ///// ///// /////

l

///// ///// ///// /////

l l

// /// /////

///// /////

,. cu m,

1

/////

/////

/////

/////

~

g g

e w

g 0

2

\\

4 E

i G

w w

5 =

l 5

S 8

0

.C m

SS W M W t

$a4 A

e w e i f i.

g W

a l I

M E

Ma a

I I

aa t

=

h 5

O Eh

.

e-e 7

I m<

ps E e n.

l

-l

- s.

I gw no i

-n 1

.B..

l E t ti i

2 RF i

I g5

.s I

S SE*

E. L..

C

'l'

i. '

$.s W 5 il i g

s= o g e

i 1 e

1 c<

h 9

s

&3 E P. ',30177 5

554.

v_

.t.5 2 A

[

4,2 t..

B.

54 g; Bud E

E

-g i

ii g

==9'

.9 I

,l l[

1

-[

i.l

[

t' I

5 dn 4

sE n

oe

'3M W94v l

cetl paa s

t nd o I eT t/

f ek ol e pe f mW o'

l Cf a

o t t oo TN s

'R CN

/

s

'R s

C n gI on ii r td o cuf el pcs snn nI o I

i S

dt U

wec T

et e A

Nsp T

es S

f un o qi l

ee l

0 IRR 1

TC s

E C

i P

hn S

t e N

p I

dos e

a Y

thn L

eti K

T l id ECE m

i EFI pwn I

okF W

l Ki Ce LEG e

LEA fW AWT R

T E

A V

s O

gn i

d sn ii hF t

o dN e

th et f

l i pw mok ce e

fW l

.~.

n a

o y

n t

a r

t r

e a

Tt t

r

/n l n t

u t e aI i

g ims ss n

C a p'.

l'.

S rs u

i y

e N

e N

di d y f

or l o

oq r l T n B.

O t 'E I

L na n

n u B. a L

A a

l I

aN l L

T

~

CT a c

CEJT a N

FJ a T

ER a U

O Y

t C

t E

t A

t F

T A

o R

N o

M o

N o

W T

E I

T F

T I

T s

E D

E C

D i

C b

N L

b l

M b -

R b

'A L

N B

A l

A u*

A E

u Q

u E

u E

A R

.R S

N W

S E

S T

S C

C C

?

Ijjll]!!

i

,1iji l:i1 I;!1l 4

i' Ii!Ii4 i};1

6 DAILY DOCUHDITATI0tt REVIEW WEEKLT STATUS T

l v4 O

WEEK Or o

i

.g

  • ATTAct1EHENT C-1 g

li j

+

i l

i I clieckJists Cloged Tots 1.I,Claicklish -Tots! I Cleecklis,ts

- This We.ek Ylels Week Closed To Date Ett11 Requirisig j

l Close-out Open Closed I.

]

3 1

Equipalent i

e j

i l

l 4

t

.Receway f

i

.I

)

Circuits l

(

l

~

O lisagers i

i

}i l

I n

i j

Fenettstions I

t 4

g g

1 s

I CEA'S t

g

.i' 4

-i.

1 1....

a 4

l-i s

~

o tn DAILY DOCUMENTATION REVIEW WEEKLY STATUS eo-O WEEK OF 9-5-83 to 9-9-83 i

ATTACitEHENT C-1 I Check. lists Closed Tots! # Checklists Tots! I Cleecklists This We,ck Thie Week Cloeod 'To Date Stilf Resguirlsig "

Close-out Open Closed l

l.

874 25 0

ST Espipmeest 57 e

p 26 5422 87

, 21 2,6

.,R ceway

  • t

+

C1resits 70 6851 99 1

70

~

H:ngers 158 35607 1229 16 158

\\

Fwatrations 2

58

.0 0

58 -

CEA'S

'29 12140 0

0 29

)!

'l_..

l 342

( "t52 440 I

38 342.

4 r noros r.u IN00HPLETE INSPECTION GlWLETION SO1EDULE Pcgo 1 ef 2 ATTAD9NMT "D*'

\\

""'" or:

L LL% %IA %ILIM Al%1 I f I

It,lkl% % L %W% 5##I%I%IL p

5 Inspectors Proposed NANCERS a_

h 4492 total l

WELDINC No. ~Schedu' led e

e l

eNo. Completed 1

, g 5 Inspectors Proposed

. CONFICURATIONS :

1 3

ilo. Schedail'edl\\, '*e, **<,

3677 total

~

No, Completed

)

_ TERMINATIONS:

p 2 Inspectors Proposed No. Schedul'ed be 438 to*p1

' No. Completed 1

l JUNCTION BOIES:

, p 2 Inspectors Proposed _

1 No. Scheduled

,4

  • a 423 total No. Completed PAN:

lynspectors Proposed No.' Scheduled.

_k, b, f,

2327 total No. Completed y

l GutDUtf

, LPresent work force, 5 week i of 2 Proposed Inspectors i

No. Scheduled tt 287 total i

No completed EQUIPENT:.

o ' be s, r a

dr 3, then 5 Inspectors Proposed 1

No. Schedule'd e

o

  • 3 1875 total No. Completed RWR's 4 Inspectors Proposed

_i P

n ho. Scheduled

's, 'd, 'J, 858 total r

  • 'C 1

(-

No. Completed i

l C*'

n-M C1 i

N i

I

ATTACHMENT '"D-1" PROPOSED WELDING INCOMPLETE INSPECTION COMPLETION STATUS s

5 5

5 5

5 Inspectors i

4492 Toul No. Scheduled 1060 1000 1000 1000 492 Inspections i

No. Cizpleted Month of:

12/83 1/84 2/84 3/84 4/84 5/84 6/84 8/84 1

e i

l l

1;P.%0152 l

t r-~, - -

--w n

--r--

-r, y

l ATTACILE{T "D-1" j

g PROPOSED 1

e INCOMPLETN' PhN INSPECTION

\\

COMPLETION STATUS l

I

~

1 l

l i

\\

e 4

Inspectors 480 480 480 480 407 2327 Total No. Scheduled Inspections fio. Ci:=p1sted Month of:

1/84 2/84 3/84 4/84 5/84 6/84 1

ny.LL(c153

-o

.m O

ATT1CHMENi "D-1" g

  • .~

PROPOSED INCOMPLETE CONDUIT INSPECTIONS COMPLETION STATUS 4

2 Inspections No. Scheduled 287 2 87 Total No. Ciz: plated Inspections Month of:

12/83 l'R000151 1

1

\\

ATTACH.*ENT "D-1"

)

[

PROPOSED I

l EQtTIPMENT INCOMPLETE INSPECTIONS i

COMPLETION STATUS e

m-s.

3 5

5 5

5 Inspectors Total Ms. Scheduled 360 370 500 500 2

- 1875

, 05 e

No. Ciz:Ip1eted Inspeetions Month of:

12/83 1/84 2/ 84 3/84 4/84 5/84 l

l l

i x

~

[*,y,.;G(;135 i

l

ATTACHMENT,'"p 1" PROPOSED JUNCIION B'OX INCOMPLETE INSPECTION COMPLETION STATUS,

.s i

2 2

Inspectors No. Scheduled 310 103 t.23 Toul 28 Pac m as No. Cimpleted Month of:

12/83 1/84 e

e O

l

\\

O F.P.00015G l

4 e

-e e

e.

se

=

m.

ATTACHMEsT "D-1" I

PROPOSED l

INCOMPLETE,RWR INSPECTIONS COMPLETION STATUS l

1 e

2 4

4 4

Inspectors No. Scheduled 160 320 320 58 858 Ton 1

~

Inspections

- No. Cbmpleted Month of:

12/83 1/84 2/84 3/84 e

e 4

e O

I e

e e

e 4

e e

9 F.P.;c0157 e

N ee-O

.-w

ATTACK.WT * "D-1" S

- ~~ ~

~

i PROPOSED TERMINATION" INCOMPLETE INSPECTION COMPLETION STATUS m-4 2

Inspectors No. Scheduled 43s 438 Total Inspeetions Month of:

12/82 O

e e

e O

I l

~

i i

d i

s suD me me a

ATTACHMENT '."D.1" 4

t PROPOSED CONFICURATION INCDMPLETE INSPECIION COMPLETION STATUS l

5 5

5 5

Inspectors No. Scheduled 1000 1000 1000 677 3677 70h1 Inspections Month of:

12/83 1/84 2/84 3/84 4/84

$/84 '6/84 b;

e S

i e

e y,gGG0158

~

~ ' '

3

' O l

OVERALL.WEEXLY BACKLOG DOCUMENTATION STATUS WEEK OF 7-f gJ v 9-9-eJ ATTACMENT "C

tut tedh / LIM A r121 No. of Backlog No. of Backlog No. of Backlog Data Documents Documents Documents J

Requiring Review Received Ramaining to Review 9/g l

\\

t;0N.

ll O L T D A 1' TuEs.

.20 /63 170

">774 3/f

^#"

I uEDs.

i uRs.

8 h-m '#

FRI.

1 800

'* 8 2 I

SAT.

3r II92

ass l

TOTAL

' ' P.

i : J

  • e a

O g r.c o n s 1

O a-w,-,-,---m-,-

a,---w

,---------,--,,.w..

,.-nr


.--,--,---,-r--,-m---

O OVERALL.k'EEKLY BACKLOG DOCUMENTATION STATUS i

k'EEK OF 9 s-e2 r, 9-9-e3 ATTACHMENT ; t'E" l

C.Eh No. of Backlog No. of Backlog No. of Backlog s.

Doctments Date Documents Documents RequiH ng Review Received Remaini,ng to Review S

tron.

ll6LrbA Y II B76

! ! "1 toncs

.TUES.

'l

' o 717 7

1o 6-

/

gges.

HURS.

8 s

18747 9/

73

/ o t. N 9

FRI.

N.

V 29 8

/oGW TOTAL ge gp.btoCEn C*EE8N G

t

.n l

l O

UP.COC160 m.en e

O QVERALL. WEEKLY BACKLOG DOCUMENTATION STATUS i

MEEK 0F 9-s ez n 9 9.a3 ATTACHMENT "k"

.crem ne A-n=ada No. of Backlog No. of Backlog No. of Backlog

)

Documartts

.I Documents Data Documents

~

Received Remaining to Review Requiring Review MON.

AOL Tb A Y 0

TUES.

10.460 6

  • % a 9/

~

I WEDS.

So

.HURS.

1 FRI.

SAT.

1f

  • f -

y, TOTAL

/ vi, v l

I l

.t 5

i i

l 0

HP.00f 1G1 l

l

ATTAoue:tT "I-1" Q

~

i i

OVERALL WEEKLT BAut1DC DOCUMENTATION j

CIMPLETION SCHEDULE T' '* i-Ccn 's 4

i "4 8

2 2

a 1

c "l

Total No. Scheduled h

IS,,

4

'o e

C o

'o a gamu O

r No. Cimpletad g

(, 'Ig g

J J

-L 1

~

e l

W e

i j

1 i

O.

i 1 P.C'J0162 l

i l

1

e-4 ATTACH W.T ' "E-1" Q

OV.EIALL WEEKLY BAGLOC DOCUMENTATION COMPLITION SOG E LE y

O OA> iM.A il P A """T13 MS I*

Total

.2

.2 2,o

.2, o.

Document.1

/*4o No. Scheduled lo 5

g a

o

-Q s

I, g

g g

No. Ciz:plstad S

A s

g Week of:

b[

, kg kg

/M s

25

  • 7xr e.eum ns.a = 8-I-as O.

1P.0501S3

~

ATTAOLCT "I'- 1" g

OVERALL WEEKLY BACKLOG DOCUMENTATION COMPLETION SOEULE T

4' ete. e sa c /uw.ru s

5 No. Scheduled

.c '

t,t-

.2*

Z 2*

^o:

't Docaments Total a

o 3

O Io I

Il Y

No. Cim:plshed k

/s,6 f

g1 8

6 tr.

.c e

miof:

8f f/6 N %

% D O.

s s..o u (..*

dp f'.

p 3.,

' ' ' '. -., a.

_ =.

E8 2 "I 4 BACKLOG DOCUMENTATION REVIEW COMPLETION SulEDULE ATTAQlHENT "E-2" l

.l

[

^

.E.JE_ EK D_ _T :

W,-

llAllCERS Ho. Compipted 4.,PS#'j; cL i

i uEi.ntuc:No. Scheduled h $ $ % 4 % % 5 % h '8; 2

l' I E L 3 % 1 A s 2._

_ _~* <$ s t '.

I fanericuaATIDilS

.I

__.___....____-____._._.__..:______~=__

.e_______

~~

l 9, i No. Scheduled

~

~

l m

~~

No, compt,ted ida '

l

. 4TERHIilATIDMSr

~

~

_=_

< <s po. Scheduled m

e

~~

~

.po. Completed

~

~

p

~

JUNCTION _A_ DIES:

nis!

l.

No. Scheduled

% \\ h % % h _*u 9

l No. Completed t,

j-RAH:

1 I

8 8 8 *- A

.i

_ (

8;4

{'

po. Scheduled Y (

%, '_i,_

r

.,,3 il e

_4 1

No. Completed j

i t

i e i I

awfoutT

___4 lll

'No. Schedule <

3 h }

1 a ;

I No. Completed I

2 2.

E_qHIPtIENT[

c poscheduled

_ h 4

-l h

i lie. Compi et e4 i

-l

{

j StVW 3

4

.1

)

I i

f WEEKI.Y DOClOATION COHl'LETION SCilElllli.E

'.

  • 2 "' 4

~

" ~ ATTAOlflENT H-2 I

M.?e. p. _

Y1t % Ys $r

$ k.N

$)

  • fl@

lY f,s; $t. h N' $

,$* Y 3,_ $

3 1

__4 w

MCEK OFs J1

_ g, HAllCERS 3

~

HEl.utuc:No. Scheduled %- i i 'e.. i. 4 i ( \\ % '8

.y-o

_ _.. D Y f

llo. Congsl et ed 2

~

2 1 2 2.

2 s 1 z s f0W4FICilRATInHS:

~~

~

u,.. Scheduled e

~=-==

- m

~

~

~~

~

~

~

~

No.2j'anpleted 8

~

ITERHINATIDilS:

'.._l.___.____,

~~

~ no. Scheduled

~

4-

~

m m

~

~~

~

~~

~

No.- Comp l et ed JilNITION f_tpKES:

N.,. Scheduled

% \\ . % % '+ *l2 cr l

7 No. Campi et ed Pall:

I I

I I I

L u...Scheduledi; ( (3 _______._..._.

i I, '.,

t, 'j, m.,

"" * ' "I' I * * *d 8

I I

--.hililll T rt u... Schedules

(

2 3..

7i 33 0. Cohepl et ed I

2.

2.

-}lill' HEN T :-.

EI -.

n.. Scheduled 3 g 2

i l

iso. Cong l et ed O

s o

1 B ACKI.OG DOGHENTATION REVIEW COMPI.ETION SOfEDIR.E O*' 2 c' 4 ATTACHHENT "E 2 l

IV~lKlThlLl% In_lR..@_f. 7Als_h_lv."1_7.h_.Al. !dQ'4l%

M

_m_ _0_,,__

T

  • mancess e

b*'

Wes.msucin.. Scheduled h 'e. S 't 4 % % \\ \\ l '.83 Mst -

No.

Ipted z z a.

a.

2.

2 s s ss 2

.~

fDM4FICURATIollS

==

u.. scheduled

~

- e. l 3

m 1,.a,

No. coperiete4

~

I raHINATIONS:

I T

~

m.

e 7_ _-

v.. scheduled

~

<..s p.. c pgeted Junction SOMES:

i No. Scheduled

% _%h %_.% i _u j

ais i i

i No. completed 9'

l 8

I s e

a. ;t.

r.ag,

p.. Schedule <i i; ( 'li, 9, f, g

,,3 Ha raarlat=d l

i.

I I

I

'I I

GM6DutT l

-No.pchedulet

( h 3 4

ara ;

[

No. foepteted E

i 2

2.

gillPtENTg pa* heduled g g 18 0 Congolet pd

_j 4

u i

&vse' I

j l

t i

1 l

1

~

e g

4 t

(

BACKLOC DOCUMENTATION REVIEli COffLETION SalEDUI.E

,~~

ATTAQilENT "E-2" L4',ilD.El.*lki.1_. f21D_lzlalwh.P41_rel.,. l.gd.0la.lz:u. -.la skrL e

e v

~-

4.

.?

'r/.E v c

e,.

I.

?

CEA's NeScheduled

_k

_e

$ \\ . *E h #* 4

  • % %. 't.i.,.$=

_#<a#g '_'eY '_g _**a5 Y

.%._'__.'% '%__'t _..e i' $.i 8

o n

a

.e i

no. :: pleted I, % 's, % \\

p

,/!

i e

s

/.-

=

RWR'S NaScheddled

==

C'*P M J

ft, 4 Il M

I i

e Cable Pulling Nepcheduled g g

l n., c

,g g g

=

i 3

g i

g I

l e

m_

w

.e e.

e w

_l 8

pw t

l

?.

s.

l O

_ _ _ - _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _