ML20214C348
| ML20214C348 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 12/04/1986 |
| From: | Corcoran T, Saklak R COMSTOCK ENGINEERING, INC. |
| To: | Marino R COMSTOCK ENGINEERING, INC. |
| References | |
| OL-I-ROREM-231, NUDOCS 8705200669 | |
| Download: ML20214C348 (15) | |
Text
v ss-es/ m -0c Q
f hYN g-2 - /2o ce m - 2 3 /
L. K. Comstock Engineering Company, Inc.
Memorandum 'o7 fM 13 A8:40 R. Marino yo:
- h.
Office: Braidwood
~~
R. M. Saklak/T. F. Corcoran Major Problem Af fecting
Subject:
Q.C. Inspection Backlog Filint Date.
April 28,,198 y As requested during our conversation on Tuesday, April 26,1983, I have prepared, for your review, a short summary on a very large problem that has become a Quality concern.
~
I had stated that Insta11atien boorts being handed in by Comstock Construction were not being properly reviewed by construction as required in all of the installation procedures. Added to this problem was the acknowledgement by CECO Q.A. recently that their department inadvertantly accepted a revision to Procedure 4.3.12, REv. 6-10-81 (Hanger Installation) which removed the foreaans responsibility of verifying and signing instal-lation reports indicating that the journeymans work and the installation report were properly completed. This procedure existed for approximately eight (8) norths until a new revision came out reinstating the foremans responsibilities. The result from this has been an added workload in-volving reinspection of the files for the -ight (8) months worth of instal-lations in order to evaluate the scope of corrective action needed.
This lack of review and verification has allowed a multitude of problems (in these reports) pass through the paper flow system eventually dumping on to the Quality Control Department for Quality Control to resolve.
A fine example of how this has affected Q.C.'s inspections, backlog and 7
filing can be found in the area of hanger inspections. Since March 16, u.'
1982, when this problem was formally addressed to Comstock in a CECO audit QA-20-82-31, Finding #2, (which by the way is still open) an on going crusade of memos, internal audits, surveillances and manhours have been generated to cleaning up this identified topic. Over one year later Quality Control is still receiving unacceptable installation reports, our backlog still exists and our inspection reports are reflecting the unsatisfactory conditions created by Construction. In hanger installations alone M. Kast has recently sent back over 440 Installation Reports to Construction for their corrective actions in an effort to satisfy the subject Q. A. Audit.
Through Ceco direction F. Rolan has asked Q.C. management what ascects of Quality Control would be desirable for incorporating changes in the Comstock Construction computer. Your office, via K. Craybill, had started i
in identify the subjects that would be considered applicable in providing a closed loop system.
R. Cosaro's response to this was that Craysi.s ideas were not necessary at that time, subsequently you were infern..
through T. F. Corcoran.
T. F. Corcoran nov informs me that R. Cer r =ay possibly charter the system that Graybill proposed.
e Major Problem Affceting PC. 2 QC Inspection Backlog Filing 4-28-83 e
The lack of an effective scheduling department (and computer) which
. n normally acts as a focal point between Construction and Quality Control
/ has inhibited the requirement for maintaining, retrieving and tracking important documents.
s Attached you will find a small sample of audits, surveillances and memos received and generated along with reduced copies of installation reports (deficient and duplicates) which represent typical problems seen on installation reports.
s s'
Prepared By:
jd h.t.2 G
l Concurred By:
)
Arl#h M/M v
RMS/dar cc:
W. A. Gardner QC Mars. File 1
4 e
4 e
I e
HRGLCt93 i
..n
e 9,'
' /l,g.;f' J G - <'."
y a
^
f A&
j fwe E steca h
L. K. COMSTOCK ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.
Memorandum for i
4 Braidwood Frank Rolan og,
.g :
T. F. Corcoran 3/3/82 i
Installation Reports p.
gg CONTROL NO: 83-03-03-01 In order to reduce excessive ICR's the Foreman shesad state on the installation reports " incomplete f abric'ation topics." They should l
also initiate Field Trouble Reports for known problems, and not rely on QC reporting nonconformances that they should be reporting.
is apparent to me that to really solve this on-going problem that Itthe solution is for Area Supervisors to get directly involved with the Foramen to make it happen consistently. Tour support in this area would be appreciated and benefit subsequent actions to reduce!
A really unnecessary ICR's.
In-process activities are both of our objectives and time / cost reduction can thusly be achieved.
/
Thank you.
- O x ;7
\\
I.T-we
,)
i T. F. Corcoran QC Manager i
TTC/tja g
cc: R. H. Saklak i
M. Kast 4 Ngrs file copy I
HR000034
~(
(*
LQA-20-82-31
~
P ECo G. A AuD r. /"'"*"'
Findine #2 Contrary to 10CFR50, App. B, Criteria X, which states that
... inspection shall be performed by individuals other than those who perforia the activity being inspected...", L. K. Comstock craft personnel have been initialing various installation / verification reports indicating acceptance of the' installations.
Discussion:
L. K..Comstock's procedures 4.3.1 rev 8-20-81, 4.3.5 rev 5-27-81, and 4.3.12 rev 6-10-82 for the installation of conduit, cable pan, and hangers, vere revised in nid-1981.
These revisions shifted the responsibility for a 100% production installation verification from the foreman n the journeyman.
The foreman now signs the installation verification report to sigMfy that the report is complete.
Corrective action required to close this item shall include procedure revisions and a documentation review to assure that all inspections were performed by individuals other than those who performed the activity.
t
]
c h< Y
>.9 8%
$ oo k~ k N
&A
.O.4'N
.e g
h p
Yk m V..h %
i ir V2
.. 3@W
- e. y. Q
, +e.., :.
i-s.,t
- 4,'.*.
, }. y\\ :,,
r.
- 5
.s.
5 Q. 6 i..l.s.U ilRLL(. 03
L. K. COMSTOCK & COMPANY. nNC.
I J
'ATTACIGENT 3 (4.14.1)
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVIILLANCE REPORT No. s-014 PROJECT:
BRAIDWOOD NUCIZAR PI. ANT UNITS 1 & 2
)
COMPANY:
Commonwealth Edison Company 10 CATION: -3raidwood, Illinois EURVIILLANCE DATE:11/23/82 AUDITOR (S): C. K. stiles [
PERSONS CONTACED, T. Corcoran, Frank Rolan, D. A. Brown-Ceco
REFERENCE:
In violation of Braidwood Procedure 4.8.12, paragraph 3.1, the construction departnant has not been using a valid hanger installation report (see Procedure 4.3.12).
s'
~
B -
MENGs It is abserved that there are great numbers of t:Ime card bacleaps entitled'" Banger Installation Report." These bogus EIt's are not approved by any present or past IKC Braidwood Procedures.
(1xhibit attached).
CORRECTIVE ACTION & ACTION to PRECLUDE RIPETITION:
To the attention of the Quality Control Manager.
)
L FOR REFEREEE ORY Response Date:
Author:
E Reply Due Date:
12/15/82 Data Item Closed:
Disposition Acceptables HRCCU.Sc l
- 'enssaasm anemovco msvisto 7 Ti.a onio. oats nav.oaTE FOR 46c.
EA3 EPR RA3 PRCCIDURE 7/1/'2
~
rt a u a
i r
e
.--<__-m,
Q@5E*
L. K. Comstock Engineering Company, Inc.
\\
~
Memorandum i
Office. Ermidwooed To-File M. Kast/1KCE QC Supervisor From:
P December 8.
Inconolete Hanner Installation Reoorts peze
Subject:
A discussion was held on December 8,1982,' a.m. with D. A. Brown, CF.Co QA Supervisor, Braidwood Nuclear Power Plant, concerning incomplete hanger installation reports. Four (4) different deficiencias talked about were as follows:
1.) Ranger Installation Reports without procedure number.
2.)
- Foreman # signed but Installed By'# ot signed.
n
.s
.s 3.) # Installed By"but no Foreman's signature.
~
4.) " Foreman"and* Installed By not signed.
(SAMPLES ATTACE':D) farra ztswed Mor awarmNin sx rxis MLnedagbom Q/ed./nn
$d Addd MrAunnsM 2tneers MMDED dsnoef YAAnlMd.1 DM4armt en His comments to se were that LKC QC would have to inspect all hangers listed on discrepant installation reports to verify that they were in fact installed and they show no deficiencies. No comments were addded as to what should be done or would be done if there were deficiencies noted.
All hangers listed on discrepant installation reports would be acceptable if in fact the inspection was performed.
W Mike Kast QC Sdpervisor MK/tja cct T. Corcoran C. K. Stiles file s
?
liR.au.3y
- - }ff/fys'?' AYY $
.ef O/
Q. A. Sees.
MA,00ER NEETALLATIOps REPORT i
nonemann frfL/
d g
nevimose mapposetseAfee0R Iso.
SLfvATeone cocoowsATES sessTALLEp ev 1940US Daft l
esasseen unto
$'Sb &
Y f <2 V 'fnA U
/ * /A U-il JY11lAf l
1 e.g.rv vd i
v I erg /
i stris 6 /
\\
s i
PffEl RP PPri s"E p ttf et%Rs 11 uun AG. Ish&HbE UstLI i.
se.:
j s 4 ; y p a,si.ess m e
- - ;=
f s
l-nos e '>irm w=
s%
Epis tsu w
.eu.ex' 5Y-w. u5 g ;. pr iska-dkd la.E Eaos IU FORREEREE E[E a
CD s.am,
e
hiif$es&
O
~
W
'N
- o. a. s.
\\
4.3.12 y nerauanos neront
,0neman agviesops SAPPOstfAeassesA IO.
OL5vAftest WOAgostATM IINTALL s gv 1980WE DATE*
-W 0
o-ws w y
a rs3 l vn P 1r i, - v-w
/
n so l t }/-
X
% IM 931 h - t e.
IL Y fi h*3*]Lif k
[
C C = l 2*
439 P= S O H V-Yl 1
I. 4.MI
.- m........
1/' '
Djal kidfdb ? L63LI
' IdNE[ITM 4
DEC 081981 LilCtAISTocrrw re w.
J 1
345'td /
Y9 h\\
. 1' O. A. Sect.
I (V
m.=
rauano --r Revt00088 OUPPORTAeApe08R 8e0.
ELEVATs088 CDOA00 stat 55 tesfALLM OY TOA0WE DATE g,
upRefeCN WBED v.
n= 711/n S
ws Jr Was Arn M ~ 10
- .'o o k t-/s -rs-n-2tv n wt 19 l*
'I A4 - /0 le l'
i B 111) A S
wf 46 M - 10 M
'I J
Efm ErfrStmit DMI V e u ne si.e.s s.es w.on. n.
s Nh0(([ ()
+
I e
$,% !Tfmom w a
=. A e dag
- r m.. __..
** M Q
L K. constoca a counssv. e.C.
, is 4212 l
MA88 gen 18eETALLAflood REP 0nf Tg*
Q,.
a.wi.e.me
.. f eso.
an.
un a.a aus I
I l. 2 f* 31 A 7
ec - eC Wee t %* fa. il f! t nerran
$..rt i
i t,
- \\
}
aMvn De,a d a s h A 9% :AshA MJ Lx
.a g
- #fMM
, 3-/H3
~
c MLar
- h.,.,r 3 en..? - ns x
un i.
~. w.
v
!f,01.Afd15$ \\
u d --v.
- . R/
f,)
o i, x
\\
lp ' w mansEn westAttarion neront
"",lltlk"
%vi
- @,7,
= ^. ". ' * ",,,
==
.n
\\
~
\\
- i. 2n, a P\\
ec -,c
<,,, e u. o u.m.
- 3.,.u
\\
\\
\\
\\
\\
\\
\\
\\
\\,
s
\\
i
\\
s uiv v t iv u
\\
\\
i m co.. M da s.,.n) i yponeman cara n vite
Y
\\
\\
nai.un om....
INSTALL SIGN OFFL COMMENTS nsPEC INSPEC '
l i
NG REv p a s.
o.3osp.
)].54 y
.p.13 $1 Ye>7W'AK a JL
^'AQ i
)
t c : '-
=
~7u&gfy s.!,
y o4gg 2 M r.4/~
10 "
A)lA p.joM
- r-e m..es-o.5crGv kgi a
- l.).5 s!
'A ZlunJL &l-
l'0-i so m o.5 sg 3 wyg1:-
- - as w +
i h ?) d :.f a s d h M 40 HoMs a
' ^ ^ ' ^ " = ' '
sw:1M eif-%/2,'u/2*/.- L Alid p., p r-o.gasr m +9
- d' i-12 x; ae s se.
o. s.c4
-a
%%s& MN1 Lw N
-a b
,,;jg Ifo45 pt 3 2 4.y.t l
\\
An.s t~
0.So4) 1.Ela:Ab Er h A 7
-='l b
- 'lA-A Ho lie H
.3 J22/
j l'
M.4 p s sr.
o.4-sy
%ya:JM rV %8erel?4
.a~
At lA yo SA y
- i. 9. p y l'
- A ' Ja.
pas sr-c.3use
% 21./,- 1 n>
- . %n.
//f>- :-?
A'W po n a
112. rt p,p r- 0.sust M 40 l}
.0.ref t L T/s.L'APr*. 8 -
A'lA Ae 651*
D *(
- ~
lJo$t.]
a',,1 0.fI
%7W'*/9'&t;O O
pss r-o bed I'
%e,7a r A f a r-#/
- 'Id
//0.$1 M
1.re.ri s.ssn o.sesy Ho en) a 3..,.e r
'7alis.- A s > s ric x !A s.a.s r. o. s,<.y
%c:++~
Ho3A a
Hs if
% % /i l M r # h n n / L E ~
m/*
' PARTAL usT or e/Alo NAdar.R L5mL rsM I
i 1
HANGER INSTALLATION CHECKSHEET NANGER ORAWING DATE VALID WELD CONFIG Na REV INSTALL SIGN OFF COMMENTS INSPEC INSPEC l
PCA 41Ii O 333.3 u s 4. n 1*
f*'0 12
& *A *A l.,.
r NA ru ents-U O
'~
~
~
"A u s.t. s s tr. r.
l-31 !>
dD_A;.L. w b W
~*
su.ns o.s s uA CD Gr K
'l-1 E2 M
~
~
"A
~
Q. 3 bath 3571 ara xn ec.23 e
5 22 Il m m a n Dh ps toA-9 O
e s.n Et
~
wa.io
~
a c.a22s x * ******. m r WUI-3 5
4'C*U M*A*A o. 4.ewn ;).J,,,,.
nd i
c.ssse v
+
v v
ge3.pp y
4 id. t.31 a.
~ ~ - - - - ~
sus S 3 *?> l ru ps.
- o. s sess l'dA-E x
- /sg&
,. s a
- NA c.3drS g
S li la ;
>, w 'A & a n,,
ce r.a m
o na w
f.<4.I,:: i l
ca.g9
.w ca c,nr Qf9,n fg
/f45.$$ '
NA l
fu te44 4**.'Y.I 1 l l
~
g.g,3 3. g
.w
,,n 7
rc. 3 en ANDit me.1-822, 4-32-83 FC. 2 4 22-83 apolf p.
1 022 a
Fledtes Be. 2 (Aedit Fotet to. 5)
Concere me. t (medit reset No. 2)
(Directed to the Freject sammager)
U V
U (Directed to the Freject Ismeeger) te vietetsee of Dr 4.3.12. pg. 3.4 regetrans v4 "The Forenes hoe toepected the heeger/seppost and g
le stelselee of Br 4.3.12. pg. 3.1.4.2 two field welde were ende eigettsed the tempoetsen by his steentere/dete".
,g perpendicular to the web ed the opport tag eteet.
The welder's steep one est effleed adjeeems to the sold pCs ful. temed s/lete2 une dispeettsened by sco en 12/16/s2.
es desegled se medit peast so. 3. as fatnese:
,M
.ae Thte uCa se esitt spam.
The NCR is written egelset the weldteg of Ceedelt meegere W9 &
g g
l CC.10. These hengere are leseted to the Amst18ery Datidig, 240S 9
346' Elevot tee. et se-21.
prewteg e-3302a to referenced en the BCE.
2404 1
3392 1
j 2373 1
2351 1
Sete of Corrective actses &
2349 1
&ctsee to Freclude Bayetitless 23e3 1
Ited tas us. 3 (And88 Petet me. 3)
File folder labeled "Comitseretten 2m-4 3072sA* testattee see (strected to the trejset seemeser) soport etteched to pero ff. sanger 52a. es foreman's eigemaare/
date. This se repeated to thse fonder.
i le viel'attee of er 4.3.12. pg. 3.1.4.2. the welder hoe met stamped Corrective Aettee 6 setten j
his eyebel adjement to the weld.
Se freelade Sepitataans The felleutsg mee ebeerved:
Fledies No. 3 (andit potet Be. 7)
M M
RANGE I (D& rested to the qlC 30amager) 2405 4/s/e3 CC-Ile se esslettee of er 4.8.12 pg. 3.2. shich statoes C0-182
- ee a rendes beste se 12C toepeeter she11 perfere e CC-73 servet11emee se so-procese empporte/hengere Aeste11ettene j
CC-9 (F-9/14-15)
~and h as pese 07.
CC-5 CC-6 se so-procese seepeettees were famed to the v alt that CC-19 ese W eden,eFore87.
CC-14 CC-12 Correettee settes & Aettee a
24e6 4/5/ 83 CC-9 (n-r/15) to Pres 3ede aspDettees 2392 4/4/03 TCC-1073 2375 4/4/33 c-es3 ant 3/23/s3 smeer en IJssella
.l 2349 3/23/s3 ameer en IJs124ea l
23e3 3/1/83 62 f
thee eene probles ese reported en Internet edit #1-018. Fledges f1.
t Corrective Aettes & Amt see to preclude tapetatSame
=
l 6
e 6
g e
I b
(
Ps. 3 e
Alpe1T Be 1-ett 4-23-43 PC. 2 MDtf fle.12o23 4-22-83 Fiedies No. 2 (apodst Petet Ee. S)
Concere Me. 1 (audit Fotet No. 2)
(Strected to the Freject gemeeger)
(2 d
0 (essected to the Freject IImmager)
In etelettee of at 4.3.12, pg. 3.4 regassess d
"The Foremos hoe tempected the henger/empport med v
i in vietettee of SF 4.3.12, pg. 3.1.4.2 two field welde were enJe eigattled the toepeettee by his eigentere/detaf*.
g pespeediceter to the web of the espporties steel.
g, l
The welder's stamp one est eff tmed adjesent to the sold NCa #637 Reased S/10/02, one dispoettissed by Ceco em 12/16/82.
a detested to asett potet so. 3, se fellemos
- ee This BCE se ett!1 epam.
. s The BCE to written agatest the weldtag of Omedelt Bengers CC-9 &
ICS f jgggg CC.10. These hameere are leested to the Aust11ery Buildles, Sees 9
)
344' Elevettee, et so-21.
presteg 9-3302A to referseced en the WCE.
2404 1
2392 1
237S 1
2351 1
ante of Corrective Aettee 6 2349 1
Act see to Free!.de tapetitsee:
23e3 1
l gledtes me. 1 (assett retet me. 3) r!!e folder labeled "csettgeretten 25-4-Se73sa* Restellet ten J
(otracted to the reeject lemmeser) saport etteched to pere $7, Seeger 524, se foremma's esgastere/
date. This le repeated in this folder.
te vietettee of BF 4.3.12, pg. 3.1.4.2, the welder has est stemped Corrective Aettes & Aettee his eyehet adjesent to the weld.
Le freclude Septattimes The fellesleg wee ebeervedt Fledian No. 3 (andit potet me. 7) l M
9$3 EapISR S (Directed to the QC IImmager)
In vietettee of er 4.8.12, pg. 3.3, uhteh states:
2405 4/4/03 CC-110
- ee e renden heele se SEC leapeeter shell perfere a CC-te2 CC-73 servettlesee se to-procese empporte/hsmesse teste11stamos CC-9 (F-q/14-15)
~and h en pose ff.
CC-5 Cre6 Be te-process toepeettees were famed in the ven!t that CC-19 ere desgeseted se,a peso f 7, CC-14 CC-12 correettve Aettes & Aetten 24e4 4/5/s3 CC-9 (s r/15) to pr.a.a= aspettatant 2392 4/4/03 TCc-lors 2375 4/4/s3 s-eas 2351 3/23/s3 meser se IJs14134 2349 3/23/e3 masser se IJs124es 23e3 3/1/es Cc-2 l
1hte eene probles une reported am Internet edit #1-410 Fledtog ft.
i 8
Correcties Aettes & Aettee to j
preetede bepeatetene 4
l 1
i r
]
T co=ouir marauation umr m
u i-5-
o.
.c
. u, e
se-
.1 e, e ~,,
.c
/
1,t a
'.".1 r,, wA o.sn
.o e a ~ar r*
s-
~,,'a rw 24 nn a.
s r.<>
aa.,
n.,,
...,.,u.,-
x.
I i n
z't I
\\
M k
lf Nayrp
/
1~.
i m ui:
f x
aummen.s e, A
-w_
/ J //-#1 1
,o.ou,engsscusso A Ss.
g,}PL,1(,,,AYED Idd1* alm /W3 doxwr 4
a.
.y?
C0860Utf pf81ALLATION REPORT c'
?.'"
y ce g
~~
1 i
1 e'Th 2*r r * ~w A
,.u, a
e.<
e, n'
- s" nc~
11<,
,. n,
.a e.a er r' s'
/
Na ns.e r-
- k <w aw mv f
de e est i
di' C :.h
/
((
?Oh 6
...::,,teb
\\'.
' < U 'RCC.t ?)
' py y-
-s 1,
,g
,tB i
.pd li R00C1C3
/
J i
rth.
/
,-n )
m a- " ' -
1 r-x
.../
_a,,
,u-d 4
t t i i s 8
i 4
i ;( h;.+W id e e e 4-4 00T300H1{
! ik
~l ':1 W
l
-j e 4 ad e a, a 44 4 t
3 e
,[,.
[
E.k, C N;J (4 N N b O N N
/
g 5
- l..
'3.
l E
(
a e
, M.. :
V i
1 E
1.1 s
=
1 e
i t
1 s
=
b[
E i
E i j 3
3: j.y s :
3 4
3 g
?
4;0a n$
i 1
l
) L 3 3 h
1 i n zu I i ! 1 1 :j
$;g ayFS N i j i
):.I lll! j b]M!l l I l l I I I I L j!
L
- L 1 JL i
w - -
)
i Q 37GV}
QK7/.W77tflSY/ CLY.lW2I%Q 1
s
'4
'9 e
q' j
l l
E l5 i
l q 4 G i
i
=
s 9 3 k s
A
{
.e E
I
..d i i E 3
A b.
5 t
,e g
.E I'
a kl s
m
! $hbh, I
l i
- g. u
.s.s -.
j 1
i n l } i.
s m
1
.< r. m+
+
e u s.
, ] ]
g i
f J
85 i
+
1 2 3 %
3 1 } 3.mn g as p
'j i n 1.i!
p f
...----,n
-r-.--c
.-....r
- -,.. ~
e.._m.--...r-,-
,.-.m
--,-..,---.-.,.-+-,.-..,-...c---.-.ve--...--,-,..-%..
d.A a coMEToc. CO A.T.,,a ut u a
somPMENT sETcEPonT p
SQUlPMGNT WELDER k*WELDsNG S&L El LOCATION '
10 he.
- DETAIL OWG. No-TOROUE DAtt WRENCH NO.
"I'CE DESCRIPTION NAME 1 NO.
MD DETAIL PRINT NO. i COL ROW ELEV.
PA4NTE.
- f f I.$,$;.? 'O Y
Qjj
[
/
/
a.-
i i
_ _ -a
_7H s I y-t
_.<.m, 45bGiii4 mes w ww I
f LE l-h - -. (W. E,IK
~
A W OLICATEb IA$TALLATICAS ]UNCTc4 DA N
L K.COMBTOCK & C0edPANY,INC.
ROUIPMENT SET RWORT 1
,DA LOCATION TOAQUE 0
DET g
PAINTED
-."* "?'"_
WAME / NO.
MD DETAIL PRINT NO.
COL R0w E lev.
.m T(M 8$
lA ll f
g}
ph X
7
% Awe r A-m
= ~
t s
/
/
T.,._
.,,.T..,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
esehew6 sea w 6se g,#
l NGI 't3su LK.104t370CKEM.CO.,IK
/
FOREMAN AV#
DA M*/f*/
H"W$0105
---en,,r e-m-,---
,,-,,----n.-,,--,
.-,---w---,,-.---,--,-,-->..,,,,----.,,----.,,,-,,------,..-n.-,
.,,n
,._.---a.nm,-----.-.w,,n...--