ML20214C223

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Intervenor Exhibit I-ROREM-209,consisting of 821115 Memo Re Signature on quality-related Documents Generated by Lk Comstock QC at Plant Site
ML20214C223
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/04/1986
From: Corcoran T
COMSTOCK ENGINEERING, INC.
To: Sommerfield T
COMSTOCK ENGINEERING, INC.
References
OL-I-ROREM-209, NUDOCS 8705200610
Download: ML20214C223 (2)


Text

. .'. 3 ll\7T~ 204 AOM/M17D 1 /M m-24f

..e ..

(

1 ) 2' c L. K. COMSTOCK ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.

Memorandunt 'A7 W.Y 13 A3 :37 Tom Sommerfisl'd ',h . Office: Brsidwood

, ,, Tom Corcoran

Subject:

Signature on Quality Related Documents Date: November 15. 1982 Generated by 1.KCE QC Braidwood Site 82-11-15.06 ,

Per your request the following mutually agreed upon clarification regarding our joint meeting of week of 11/12/82 for what is meant by a signature on a quality document is as follows:

1. A Level I Inspector's signature signifies what he observed in performing an inspection.
2. A Level II Inspector's signature on a Level I inspected document signifies that he'is certified in the area for which the Level I signed for. This is to consist of his review of the Level I Inspector's ICR/NCR/ Inspection c hecklist, etc is; a) complete

'V b) legible 6 ,

g c) trackable o -

d) clearly defines the status of q 3

  • \

\ h the item inspected. ,

s

\ N0TE: He may elect to re-inspect any aspect particularily to; 3 $ N ,

, a) completeness of the report BNdM l N b) verify condition reported by the Level I's I $SS }%

@k d9 5 5%

i$

w j D.s findings c) clarify the Level I report d) satisfy himself that the Level I was

~g d

,i l @} } a i O adequately trained to perform the u

j l j

h' inspection reported for.

j

>h

  • Q  !'  ;

'.\tV !l f 21 A Level II reviewer's signature for a Level II certified inspector who performed the initial inspection in the specific area covered

! !l l (viewingdocumentsfor.does notinitial haveLevel to beII certified forhowever, the specific topic, h3 3 l The.

murt be certified for the area the reports affect.

Inspector, ei w n53 a I

31 52 5=!?

={305 3 2ft2 The 5 E reviewer's Level II primary role in reviewing a certified Level II originator's documents is responsible for; l

l I

a) completeness b) trackability of all relative documents /

references, revisions of drawings, etc.

07052hhB612Og DR 05000456 c) clearly defines the status of the item PDR inspected for.

NOTE: A Level II reviewer cannot re-inspect a Level I or another Level II's unless specifically certified for the type of HR0000cs

. N -

s inspected area aff ected such as;

. a) cable pull b) weld inspection c) configuration l

. 4) eN

, NOTE: If re-inspection is warranted or deemed advisable, the l reviewer is to obtain another Level II who is certified for the specific procedure to be employed in concert '

with his review.

3. Quality Manager or his designee's signature does not require he be *'

certified for*' inspection 7 but shall signify he is qualified to analyze all pertinent records for:

a) Certified Level II Inspector's performing in specific areas are utilized for the quality reports.

b) Trained Level I's Inspectors performing initial in-spections are properly trained to the specific area being reported.

c) That all documents track properly, relative to P/N ft Rey. letters and other engineering / procedure instructions.

d) That all documents are complete.

e) That all reports define correctly the requirements and specific nonconformance in sufficient detail to permit ICR/NCR review dispositions, actions as a consequence of reporting nonconformances.

NOTE: The use of a** referee action"by Quality Management or his designee is permitted only at a* Supervisor / Engineer or higher technical level, subject to the customer's (CECO) concurrence. The rationale and disposition on reporting inspection findings must be clearly stated on QC records subj ect to audit review or confirmation as to acceptability.

4 Quality Management or his designee's signature shall be indicative of proper and accurate statements as to Corrective Action Taken and To Prevent Re-occurrence, subj ect to audit (findings) by the originating auditor for acceptability.

h?)f C#Lk Tom Corcoran QC Manager TTC/tja cc: Doug Brown ,

Frank Rolan 4 Rick Saklak Mike Kast

  • l C. K. S tiles i W. A. Gardner i file HR000069 6

,_ . . - , - --, - . - - - - - - - , - - ,- - - - - -