ML20214C215
| ML20214C215 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 08/12/1986 |
| From: | Snyder AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | |
| References | |
| OL-A-114, NUDOCS 8705200607 | |
| Download: ML20214C215 (7) | |
Text
- I, 80-',h '
'y e n/r, f
. ~
e f
"y A
Well, I'm aware of it now b g,$ra 21 p W 6 the letters I've got.
ecause of the meetings or 3);,
I N
the people say.
It's all in this information e'
of what f
Q This is what BPI sont to you?
r.
g, A
Well, yes.
NRC some things was said over thThe resp I
h nt to the 9
,j
=entioned.
ere that maybe that was I can't say it's right in ther
,r' e, though.
But whatever uns said over there was my first experience
-[0 esides my own here'o. other peo l do somethingMhov dir'^
p e being told to 4
know.
ink was fair or right, you
.g Q
Okay.
Do you
(
h recall any QC inspector was told to do specific instance where a Ih in violation of the Comstock something by a supervisor g t was
- }
I never personally witnessed iprocedures o A
/' Y6 like I said, t, no.
3, f,
everybody has their own area t I
you kno',
1 A w
p
!]
And what other people, what h o take care of.
know and I don't care to know appens to them, I don't
'h
, you know, really.
Q Okay.
- Now, m
l' fe the next day; is that correct?you went to the NRC r
'A 7 inspector
'.f,h A
Yes.
,t, ig
@ % !?M fewgMERON--
Q Together with five other QC i jEblBRfI'b A
nspectors?
( s t : n.,ertins 312 23242st '.
y/
i;
(
..,.. u s s, a
f,s.r2
),."M Y^)
j
~
.n j
_Ju m,. '
, # c<.
..,, wi# 'e ~
~'
R DO K 00
/
a
~
i
(
s f
ff1 i
A Uh-huh.
79
(
k 2 Q
okay.
3 gol, 3 And whose idea was it to go t you recall?
o the NRC, do
.c z.
- c. 6 / 4
( 4t A
- -I. ;,
It was mine.
-)f&. 5 to think about this, you knowI *elt like
- I had the whol M ih'.
e night
$.'6 thought maybe I should just l It shocked me at first.
And I f
et it go.
'hg,*.* 7 But the more I thought about i
(
i
,3 M.9
--my conscious wouldn't let me l t, you know, I just s _..,
going to happen the next time et it go, because what was
,i j0 4
Ard I didn't go to Irv DeWald
' s. :
Ri.1 f.9 this had happened before right away because
~
c'y with other inspectors and theynot a threat maybe bu r.z
,'"U b
up,,or whatever.
were both reprimanded, written g3
~
And I knew that Rick had b
(
'is it by management:or by Edison een told to cool o
g5
, you know,
- g..
aware of hic temper.
because everyone was
'{,16 So, that's the reason I did i -#
(l.ig7 first.
I felt strongly enough to n't go to Irv DeWald see what their response would bego to the NRC about it and s
A:
n Q
And this was becausein your opinion, g
m'jg shocking incident that Mr. Sakl k it was such a a
do something that was in viol ti would attepot to ask you to d:
a on of ornceiug2,
.p A
Well, that, yes.
s?
And the actual threat
, whether he 1
a l fsv
$4
?-
v %
, esst t.
5 1
meant it or not I couldn't tell I
l' 60
.2 I mean, you know, he was aggra g-y7{I 3
y?
time I think because he'Vas pr vated and mad at the
(;4 oved wrong.
tried to prove him wrong but h I mean, not that I
,?
'h: 5 '
which, you know, e tried to go out of bounds her p
6 is not allowed.
e
- 6 So, I; -7 that was the main reason I because of the threat, went over there was Y
you know.
~ g something but I didn't do it He tried to make me do violation, too.
_ I don't know.
9 That is a 3g If I didn't go through the act
- 1
- out, then it would have been my and close the thing problem, you know.
.j the actual threat was -
and h But I felt didn't know whether he meant i e's the type ma'n, like I said
,I the next time if I said:
t or what was going to ha a
ppen
- Rick, You know, I'll let it go this time he had been let off before Q
All right.
So Now --
A
-- I had no problems with Rick P.
you know.
up until that time,
- Really, it was a get the job done thi no problems with him.
ng and I had 4-t\\
Q All right.
Does that complete your
,t A
Yes, I'n complete.
answer?
't Q
That's okay.
f a
Don't fool obligated to well, try t
t s
I u!
A f
.I h
' s Vh j
m M M v.
g.
j s
k 3
1 to answer all my questions th 15 P ~
I-2 81 vant to say.
e best you can.
That's W:
all I
%f3
{ [,'/M You made two statements th t t=
A a
Okay.
I need to clear up,
" 5 Q
And it's this had happened beforeone there that you can clear
'6 up.
You said 2;)
What did you mean when y t
'g' ou said that?
A He had been well, there x.-
b[Y p
Frank Rolan.
was an incident with
_I know that he was written up for 860 and Frank, or both, I believe
,.y s.
or Rick was,
- {1
- what started it, I don't know what the incident but I know they were both 12 f
.3 called into the office and told
, you know, r_
together, you know.
to cool it apparently a d n
work gj Apparently they had a dis 5
of them would back off of it agrooment and neither one Q
Do you know the nature of I really don't.
the disagreement?
v A
No,
.t N
Q Do you know whether Mr i
I don't believe he did. Saklak throatened Mr.
A You know, really.
I know they had an argument I don't know, 4
I And I had witnessed Rick
)
one other time O
Well, wait a minuto 4
9 l
P
?ji l[i$
t
.. - rw
_ -M.mGs.7 j
t
.e
'y u
.j.
,. 1 A
okay.
a2
(-
'6!}2 tgr Q
Were you present at the Rick Saklak/F
'.3 incident?
rank Rolan '/ ' %4 A No. TI,5 Q Okay. All right. 6 Now, you saw -- A I did witness Rick jumping all over Mik
- 8. ^
7 day. e Lekner one I was sitting right besido Mike t. f 'g , and it was obvious. {)l' y mean, the whole office was there I 1 You know, we were again in another office where i y management wasn't around. And so Rick's office was in our c ( 'gg. office, too. \\., 5 l,..! And Mike was goofing off or joking ( (J' 'til noon, and Mike's kind of a comedi It was five jj'. i.c an, if you know him. 8y And there happened to be an NRC man th ); ere talking with Saklak ".(,$ and Rick took it strongly that Mike sho ld u jg that, which I agree, n't have been doing ld you know. But he was -- he had como to Rick ',) come to Mike and was screaming at him or, excuse me, 3 , you know, right in 'j front of us all to keep his mouth shut ,3 20 this stuff. next timo, you know, And then he walked out of the offic g o and then he como back and g nting to him again and yell d 4 e at him. 2 And just for Miko laughing around. He was hot; he l 1 l l ~
- J R
. n.mhaaRE v i e.: ?.[ was red and hot and going to lunch .(' f [. , you know. 83 Q
- Now, in other words, would it be fair to say th
.+ j. when you used the words "this had happened b f en v.,. ;.
- (
referring to Mr. Saklak's e ore" you were kh outbursts of temper, right? y A Temper, right. No, y{l y ' g*. no threats; just temper. Q Okay. So, him yelling or bursting out and ij.j yelling or screaming, you are not referring, arc you y"; .j , when you used this term "this had happened before" t ),.. - g'j. o any demand which you know of or any order that you know of k. sr; h'g or demand that had been .) i nade by Mr. Saklak to any QC inspector to vi l ]8. s.7h procedures or NRC regulations, h o ate Comstock V. were you? 4 , ig. A No. N Q okay. f. I just wanted that to be clear on th j record. e So to the best of your knowledge th .s e only time that I Mr. Saklak ever ordered anybody or att g '. 4 to violate Comstock procedure was wh empted to order anybody t 5 '4 1 ! en he attempted to orde. ! i 1-you to do so with re;;pect to that ICR and Engi f-neering l! h, disposition; is that correct? t ,{ { .') A Yes. 9 % \\' Q And you did not violate Comstock proc d 4 Mr. Saklak 's request? e ures despite b ' =t 't A Right. I didn't sign it. !p. , c.. , f;. I > f I ' T. .l1 . J ii , 4 s, I li 1 i.
sv&x Dyo Ex.*r 'N % $(NDER FOLO ON h A(P(ggR FQLD ON - Al;ho Beiness Forms. Delmont. PA 15626 atoaosa ecau No LK b 'h . COMSTOCK & COMPANY, INC. READ (h ""hg REPLY m,N, Ease sses rG Te. d d . Nt ass' L J~ M?'35 TO: DATE SUBJECT (f ### L _J f"*" Go 3-zs-ss at gyar: mad $. ego,sy 44/4s C,)4fi<ahad me in #e e/o(/4 ofsii aremned dy.se 1 %hns Ad you note me so p& sed cfr afi.f AxAh. 1astas<~-ca u<d ' p sos ~c.y~us E / W OLY ft Sddfd $$/1/I l, fC AfffU/? $5! 0 YOU/> d L 6 G 4 d L _ rt: - m. t o. 3 -M.... 5
- Mfw, 3 13*
1 e > fl my SiCNCO DATE 't RECEtVER: WRI1E REPLY, DETACH STUB, KEEP PINK COPY. RETURN WHITE COPY TO SENDER. 1 i 52 '000L15S2 .-}}