ML20214C066
| ML20214C066 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde, Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 12/03/1986 |
| From: | COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | |
| References | |
| OL-I-ROREM-205, NUDOCS 8705200528 | |
| Download: ML20214C066 (7) | |
Text
avvy cs q N/ ham $0b
- /#/8 (
. f~.
SURVIILUJ:CE DATE:
( tembsr 25, 1982 LE No.
2790A.22S BRAID'dOCD Q. A. SURVEILLAMCE REPORT NO;. - 2466 3
.c Contractor / Organization:
L. K C
,,___________________----------. Comstock---------- 97-g,--} z,- ;,.-, a egory--------, g_3, ys-y b
3 Ite= observed:
On September 25, 1982 a surveillance was conducted on L. K. Comstock
~~
The area of observation was Safety Related Conduit Installation /
Inspections.
Listed on Attachment I are the drawing areas which have safety related conduit installed (per L. K. Comstock's marked up drawings).
Also listed is the number of installed conduit, number of Q.C. Inspections, and the percent of conduit inspected per drawing area.
The percent of Inspection may be lower because not all of the The over all percent of Q.C. Inspections is 32%. conduit that hav required to have 35%.
L. K. Comstock is drawing areas have not had evenAs can be seen on Attachment I, 45 out of 65 That is 69% of the drawing areas.(1) one Q.C. Inspection perfomed.
follows: Breaking the drawings down by buildings the results are as Containment I:
19% - Total Q.C. Inspections 84% - Drawing areas with y,o Q.C. Inspections Aux Building:
36% - Total Q.C. Inspections 63% - Drawing areas with Ro,Q.C. Inspections o
The reason why the overall Q.C. inspections are high because a few drawing areas have most of the installed conduit inspected.
In addition to the above, the items listed on Attachment II were observed.
RECElVED Corrective. action. taken:
L.K.Comsto'ckwasinfor=edviathissurveibe.
L K. NM0CK EK C0.,INC.
Reported by: b/I Date
/
fL 0705200528 861203
~
Approved by: i) A
/t / 2.
FU Action Verified b ((
- ate: r P
gDR ADOCK 0500 6
Date: / 2 4"N)
Q.
. En eer
/
/!I
[3 kfUAC;1onApprovedA{1 :\\TQ y. Supmuor DAH:skg 4
te:
n QA CC: W. J. shewski G. F. Marcus /
R. Cosaro d4fl 271983 Contractor l K. C % s m g g g "000M Q.A. File
Surv. 2466 Follow-Up Action:
The letter dated October 26, 1982 from L. Tapella of the l
Project Construction Department informed L. K. Comstock that effective November 1, 1982 L. K. Comstock will perform 100if inspection of all Safety Related installations (See Attachment III).
With the 100:5 inspection of all S/R installations the problem of non-uniform selections of drawing areas to be inspected is eliminated.
For the items listed on Attachment II pertaining to the drawing not being marked was corrected.
The drawings were updated to reflect the current status.
For those items with a missing installation report there is a Q.C. inspection report.
The quality acceptance of an installation is based on an acceptable Q.C. Inspection report not an installation report (See Attachment IV).
Based upon the above infor=ation, this surveillance is closed.
s.
\\
HHuocc40
.m.
I.
(
" Attachment I" Drawing #
No. Installed No. Insuected
% Instected 0-3301 8
og 0-3302 23 og 0-3303 6
og 0-3305 1
og 0-3309 113 36 31%
0-3310 26 19 73%
0-3312 19 og 0-3314 14 og 0-3315 7
2 29%
0-3321 5
og 0-3322 7
og 0-3323 1
og 0-3325 4
og 0-3331 3
og 0-3335 2
og 0-3351 2
og 0-3352 2
og 0-3361 54 21 39%
0-3362 4
1 25%
0-3363 1
og 0-3371 25 a
40%
0-3376 1
og 0-3381 24 og 0-3382 5
og 0-3385 2
og 0-3386 2
og 1-3301 32 29
'9 195 1-3302 17 6
35%
1-3304 21 og 1-3305 32 32 100%
1-3312 43 og 1-3314 54 17 31%
1-3317 9
og 1-3321 39 og r
1-3322 6
og 1-3324 2
og 1-3331 40 6
15%
l 1-3332 2
og 1-3341 7
og i
1-3342 8
3 37%
1-3343 2
1 50%
1-3351 27 8
30%
l 1-3352 2
og j
1-3361 46 40 87; 1-3371 24 19 79g 1-3374 31 15 48g 1-3511 15 og i
1-3512 2
og 1-3513 6
c6 1-3514 11 g;
i HR000041 l
1
. (.
Attachmsnt I Drawine 4
!!o. Installed No Inspected
% Insoected 1-3521 22 7
32%
1-3522 6
og 1-3523 9
og 1-3524 10 og 1-3531 5
og 1-3532 2
og 1-3533 7
og 1-3534 17 og 1-3541 12 11 92%
1-3542 7
7 1oog 1-3543 4
og 1-3544 15 og 1-3551 3
og 1-3575 1
og 1-3576 4
og Totals 963 315 32%
6 G
l l
HR000042 e
[.'
(
(
"Atttchesnt II" Drawing d Conduit 3 Remarks 0-3361 COA 6147 (P1E)
No Inst. Report but Q.C. Inspected.
0-3361 COA 6134 (P2E)
Not marked as installed on drawing COA 6135 (P2E) but has been Q.C. Inspected and has installation report.
0-3361 COA 61B3 (C2R)
Q.C. inspected, no installation report.
0-3362 COA 6214 (K4W)
Q.C. Inspected..Has installation report but not marked on drawing.
1-3301 C1A0108 K1R Q.C. inspected, no installation report.
1-3305 C1A0539 P1E Q.C. inspected, no installation report.*
C1A0540 P1E C1A0541 C1E C1A0542 C1E C1A0543 C2E C1A0544 C2E C1A0545 P2E C1A0546 P2E 1-3314 C1A1480 (C2E)
Q.C. inspected, has installation report.
C1A1481 (P2E)
Drawing not marked.
1-3361 C1A6122 C2R Q.C. inspected, has installation report, C1A6123 C2R but draving not marked.
C1A6154 C2E C1A6168 P2E C1A61B6. C2E 1-3371 C1A7128 (C2E)
Q.C. inspected, no installation report.
1-3521 C1R2157 (C2E Q.C. inspected, no installation report.
1-3541 C1R4101 K3R Q.C. inspected, has installation report, C1R4102 K3R but drawing not marked.
C1R4129 C1E C1R4146 P1E C1R4154 1E C1R4155 P1E C1R4156 C1E l
l i
HK000043
~
2 '7FN, e Tt.-
' ff73
- p. s.
" Attach.?.;nt III" e.-e..,.
M y-October 26, 1982 TO:
B. Brown F. Roland FROM:
L. Tapella
SUBJECT:
1007. Inspection Requirement Effective November 1,1982, you are required to perform a 100% inspection of all Safety Related installations. The 100%
inspection includes: hanger ccnfiguraticn, conduit, and. cable
.g.
pan installations. In order to expedite the inspection process inspection forms should be consolidated where possible. Also, the cross-training of inspectors, as currently being acecmplish-ed, should be completed as expeditiously aa possible.
The release of cable for pull still requires /allcws minimum inspection.
(Field installatien report and pan to hanger weld inspection report.) However, every effort should be made to complete all inspections prior to the pull of cables.
Additicnal directier. will be given at a later date concern-ing any backfit inspection.
n.
/
//
a.
. J. Ta ella i'.
Project Construction Dept.
i cc:
T. R. Sor.merfield.
T. Corcorar. - L. K. Comsteeg J. Hii - L, K. Comstock y:.
J::"
.= -
r.
4 n
- V.
V,\\g 2 B $82 97f W,p c~
- gge
- 0? -
9 HR000044
e "Atttch."Cnt IV"
%g
~~
L. K. Comstock Engineering Company, Inc.
~
Memorandum yo:
File Office: Braidvocod From:
M. Kast/1.KCE OC Supervisor Sueiect: _ Incosolete Hanner Installation Reoorts Oste: December 8, 1982 A discussion was held on December 8,1982, a.m. with D. A. Brown, CICo QA Supervisor, Braidwood Nuclear Power Plant, concerning incomplete hanger installation reports. Four (4) different deficiencies talked about were as follows:
1.)
Hanger Installation Reports without procedure number.
2.)
Toreman signed but Installed By not signed.
3.)
Installed By but no Foreman's signature.
4.)
Toreman and Installed By not signed.
(SAMPLES ATTACHED)
His coments to me were that 1.KC QC would have to inspect all hangers listed on discrepant installation reports to verify that they were in fact installed and they show no deficiencies. No co=sents were addded as to what should be done or would be done if there were deficiencies noted.
All hangers listed on discrepant installation reports would be acceptable if in fact the inspection was performed.
6 "n
Mike Kast QC Supervisor J a!!, b.INii;a.:
KK/tJm supJ
.ur.,*Q.R d.1p'bf.'IUl!*
gg j;,,,,
kg cc T. Corcoran Q.
hIf Kg ' IEAl**
l S M HR000045 s
__