ML20214B184
| ML20214B184 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 07/29/1986 |
| From: | Rolan F COMSTOCK ENGINEERING, INC. |
| To: | Dewald I COMSTOCK ENGINEERING, INC. |
| References | |
| C85-04-41, C85-4-41, OL-I-ROREM-082, OL-I-ROREM-82, NUDOCS 8705200174 | |
| Download: ML20214B184 (5) | |
Text
._.
T - Ro<e m - f &
en~., y
. w,
00CKETED
'7 USNRC L. K. Comstock & Company, 2Inc.
~
- B7 APR 22 P7 3 Memorand um 0FFtCE CF SES: :1:.e <
Tc:
frv DeWald 00CKET g g Rv!cf' Braidwood Onia.
From:
F. RClan
Subject:
Early Quits o,,.:
04-10-85 Control No.:
C85-04-41 As per conversation last week with Wayne Elens, C.E.Co's Security, 3
i J, he made us aware that a number of L.K.C employees were leaving the
~\\r j l jobsite through the " red pass" gate between the hours of 4:10 and
,/
4:25 p.m.
Last Thursday April 4 at 4:05 p.m. I was.at the gate to verify Mr'.
Elens allegations. The first L.K.C. employee to arrive at the gate early was your Mr. Rick Martin, badge No. 066, the time was 4:22 p.m.
(this was verified by the guard on duty).
8
. 8 Please instruct your personnal that the r 5) r scheduled work hours for the Braidwood Project are 2:00 a.m. tc 12. O noon and 12:30 p.m.
to 4:30 p.m. and that the gate will be mor itor o early quits.
l l
P j
\\
)
. Rolan Project Manager FR/dp cc:
file
')[
NUCLEAR RIGutMOP? wMMIS$10N w,,uso M.tVM % aE,wn W2-p la the mattet of E
N j----t/
IDENTIFIED I
N'D Staff RECEIVED App %nt V
REJECED Intmenor _
$~
?
DATE
--r
,, to, witness __ M T4 e A
m.,
-f d -
n,,,,,,
/
B705200174 860729 PDR ADOCK 05000456 Q
/Ws Comstock Engineering, Inc.
~
Memorandum Tc:
File office: Braidwood From:
L. G. Seese
Subject:
Meeting Notes Date:
h/13/85 Personal / Confidential This memorandum is issued to document a meeting held in the QC Manager's office on Friday, April 12, 1985 at 8:15 a.m.
Those in attendance vere I. F. DeWald, R. L. Martin and L. G. Seese. The subject of the meeting was a written warning issued to Mr. Martin for falsification of company records.
The following is the series of events during this twenty (201 minute teeting.
1.
I read the warning and explained the seriousness of this action when coupled with Rick's past record and his latest e=ployee evaluation.
I explained that continued performance of this type vould not be tolerated.
2.
Mr. Martin refused to sign the warning.
3.
I asked Rick if he had any coc=ents, he stated that he vanted to talk with me today to see what he could do to be a better employee.
h.
Both Irv DeWald and I stressed the fact that it was not our purpose to have him fired only to assist him in following company rules and being more attentive to his assigned duties.
5 Rick pointed out another e=ployee who, in his opinion, was less productive. Rick also stated that he was the only one in the entire QC Department that was not working overtime.
6.
I advised him that his concern over the other employee would be passed on to that supervisor.
I also stated that the reason Rick was not on overtime was because the WANG Status was in the process of being converted to the IBM and since this is his project and we are considerably ahead of engineering, no overtime would be required until the IBM printouts are available.
7.
Irv explained to Rick what action he vanted once the IBM printouts were available.
8.
I asked Rick if he had any additional coccents. He stated that he recently vent to the NRC concerning Rick Saklak. He stated that the NRC' misrepresented some of his co= cents. Rick stated that he co=plained to the NRC on 3/29/85 that one afternoon (approx. 3/01/85) he talked with the NRC and the next morning I moved him into the QC Vault.
i
)
9.
I reminded Rick that his conversations with the NRC are private and that I would have no way of knowing when he talked to them and in addition that his money or job assignment did not change, only his seating assignment. The reason for that change was increased control over the QC records that he used for his computer status.
10.
The meeting ended with Rick being cautioned not to be involved in additional violations of company policy.
Irv and I stressed that if he wanted to improve his work image we would be glad to work with him.
S in cerely 3) 3 Jm L. G. Seese Assistant Quality Control Manager LCS/cg cc:
- 1. DeWald R. Martin I
\\
\\
--r
Exhibit: 20-60-35A COMSTOCK ENGINEERING, INC.
EMPLOYEE WARNING RECORD R. L. Martin Section Quality Control Employee's Name Date of Warning 04/12/85 Nature of Warning l
l Substandard Work M Conduct l
l Tardiness l
l Carelessness l
l Disobedience l
l Absence 1st Warning M 1985 2nd Warning l
l
[frJf Date S-/d'N-y Supervisor's Signature AN-Ma9n f-n -F r t w w yu n Gaa rmes w.
Employee's Signature Date Remarks: On April 4.1985 Mr. Martin signed the L. K. Comstock Company QA/QC Time Report (reference attached page 4 of 5) indicating he was at work from 7:36 a.m. to 4t30 p.m.
Contrary to his documented record Mr. Martin was observed at the sate at 4:22 p.m. (reference attachment B). This fal.sification of records violates company policy.(Reference Employee Manual Sectiou 20-60-35A).
Orignial:
Corporate Personnel File Copies:
Employee Supervisor Farn N om 20-60-35A 11/83 m
l O
7%e y c,.c g-j
~
L. K. C0!* STOCK ENGINEETs!NG Q.A. & Q.C.
MTE LL'NCH Time Time Time Time potal Hrs Sacge 3gg.;;3g No.
In Out In Out H*k ad
k&3
/: (AE t., :C
~5:'-i D
/D Qvf.364-ILw: b/ Deli 15.1
.63'O
/d) v ei d.
k.-h.,,..+-
4:ss rz :<o n
t, ve 5 o 9
V #2/4 -
/ 5 h % M 4.'f6 S'3F
/d
" p1.WW
?Sf 46*GVrrt-l: <?
51kn iD
/ fitt t M 9/i'e,v,,.L i C-5y 53o-ta u Jac 5 7~'8 sew w 1kp
( {l.go
/d
( " @ ;t.3-U r.c ff fit g' : A 7:60 S.*36
/0 4e9,$MwU 7 'dC (o:C0 m.f
/I
/J/$9
" T'7/ 7,c.-c'q
~? l O')
5.'30
/O d M / W h fd'4.s 720 7
/
\\
v 1;, o
,0cadn
{!f6,,
700 OA
!D
<,#s h4Li/
no
.s:n m
AG 7 M' 7
33O v
v 81.9 Sk.Yd,
./~~ ~~nS
.53f 4 9.'
s //f 8(x&,.sy /
ifN
~
b:eo to.6 v /bl/h)
W W 4 i ?...
/
7 W>
'-%6 N')b L. 2 : iR
. f1n' C2 3,.1.h Q v
-n du Jsdi..,.
1.Kl;
^' -M V'
v
< MO
,e.WdB 7at
(
A:c 'd
)
c '.n fl
-p p t4 L - o. ;, iici k A m.n G ew
, e
.nd
/i