ML20214A351

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Intervenor Exhibit I-ROREM-129,consisting of Undated Ltr Forwarding Questionnaire to Show That Inspectors Will Voice Views,Opinion & Any Quality Concerns at Plant
ML20214A351
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/10/1986
From:
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
References
OL-I-ROREM-129, NUDOCS 8705190403
Download: ML20214A351 (3)


Text

_

n

-L - KDrem - /z 9

x-r. r

,i

'87 AFR 22 P7 :19 0Frt t

THI5

/3 A GUEST /CNNAIRE 1.

7YPED UFFED, AffNWiTHE MEYT/NB MTR LXC o CELD AND THE NRC.,

THIS QUE.37/DNNAIRE. /S 70 SR6tu 7 MAT

/

7NE INSPELTo% WILL VD/CE TRELE VIEWS APINiaAl AND ANY L2M/EEENS 7NEY MAIIE A3 LAAM AS /T WA5N'T dNE 0F THE M6AN/ZA T/DH USTED A60l/E ALSD

/T INA5 47RTED /N THE MEET /N6 7NAT EYEEY-e 7N/W65 ALR/6MT o THERE ARE NO PAiDSCEM5 i.I 7N/NK 71/E dt.JPST/DAJ-NA/GES WILL.

4HoLU D7MER UJISE.

7N/3 GIM.ST/DVNA/EES /S N07 7D cal.lSE M BBLE/M3 : BUT BR/AEs ANY CUT ED 7NEY. 64N BE ADDRES5ED AND J2M.vED.

I HdPE ANYdNE READ /N4. THESE, W/L.L. K50 AN. 62NF M/ND 4MD USE TME INFof]MR77DN LDNS7KUC7NE2.Y.

. 7NANK. #U, NUCLIAR REGULATORY COMMIS$10N L.

Docket No. S'YSb SYS"Y Official Esm. No. lI$

. e.in.nw., A f,//.c. i, d <,

Staff IDE.1T:FiED Applicant RECDVED intemnw RUECTED Conr3 Offt N'/0" Contractu DATE Othw WitneMMbM3# A 4[

Reporte

~

/

i 8705190403 860910 PDR ADOCK 05000456 c

PDR j

7.., -

l IEXH$li ~2ENM((s gi;.;i;;pw

Thu guutionnaue has been made up to give thoas the facedom of voicing theLa views without having to be identified. Thu quutionnabe has not been made up by management or the utility. Itr' anly punpose u to let ur voice our opinion on views without ping to the Hid, quality propama, or management.Please answu au questions truthfady and Judy. you may if you uant to sign your name,it u totauy your deculon and u not nequ ued har stated above.

Th d you il Hx do fed about thLa site as faa as work adations, quality and thu slie companed to othu altu?

2) Hw do feel about the adatLons between management and the worken?
3) Do you feel thus are quality concenns at thu site,that have not been addreuse
4) Do you fed, LJ you identify quality conceans that you may be looked down upon or blackl uted by management?

51 How do you feel about the quality paoyam at thu slie?

6) If thus was a uay to stay totallu anonymous,do you think more quality conceans would be brought up?

-continued on nut page-J fl)

7) Do you think thene ans people, that are out hue just for the money and that they don't uent to get caught up in quality concerns or problems?
8) Do you feel there h an attitude out hue, to do just what you have to, too get by?
9) Do you feel any pusonnel have been shifted around (put in a diffuent position) by nunnagement because they addreued quality concerns, or har Lt is called sometimu,

" making unver" ?

10) If you had a quallty concern that you felt may shut the job down,would you think twlce about reporting Lt.?

t) 11ae'thus any suggutions you have that you feel might inprove thLa job?

12) Do you feel youn svu pasuured or rushed to pst your job dons,due to production pneuure?

(2) l k

_..