ML20214A248
| ML20214A248 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 07/24/1986 |
| From: | Hunter R AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | |
| References | |
| OL-I-ROREM-070, OL-I-ROREM-70, NUDOCS 8705190348 | |
| Download: ML20214A248 (2) | |
Text
i
'+
-^
5o/;5s:py-oy
~
I - h.c.'4% - 7 8 To: quality First i
This letter is the result of my conversation " Exit Interview" of F. Q T..
March 26, 1986 at the Braidwood Construction Site.
'87 I will try to list the areas I wish to have checked / looked into. APR 22 P7 :02
- 1) My Termination fi[.
c, Was my termination correct by set procedure and according to all IIShs related to the termination of the work force.
I was shown no letter of termination nor was I asked to sign anything which stated that I had violated any so-called procedure.
- 2) Harassment / Intimidation Was this 'not a way to get back at the people who had given a deposition to the Intervenors BPI and NRC people, as well as being a personallity clash between Mr. Tony Simele and myself.
- 3) Training /InstructionattheBraidwoodSite I wish to question the accepted criteria used at the Braidwood Power Plant Construction Site. Does this project accept NCIG - 01 section 2. -2.1 and 2.2 of General Inspection? Ihis along with the training, instructions, and supervision given in any and all areas of quality Control and quality Assurance.
I, in my own mind, am sure that there has never been a nuclear plant built in the United States whereby the training of inspectors is so inadequate and done in such a hap-hazard manner.
I do not blame anyone, except Comstock, for this. For the past two and a half years we (that is Comstock) has changed training personnel about every three months or so.
It may be that Comstock or the nuclear field is of the opinion that knowledge is not one of the criteria's needs for quality Control inspection work.
I have always been taught that in order for one to gain knowledge and in order to have the capacity to retain this same knowledge, one must hear, see, i
NNM/fAteM;0mah
.g{73
- W B705190348 860724
- 88f PDR ADOCK 050004S6 4-CAPh8 % 312 22 M G
g,.,
and do - soms of us mora than others. As you know Comstock retained the right to train, manage, and supervise when B5'ICO took over the quality Control work force. 'Ihis I also question.
- 4) Favoritism / Buddy-Buddy Situations I believe you will find certain people are shown faveritism - people wno were not in favor of organizing, drinking buddies, and pot or drug buddies. Yes, I do believe you will find that not only some inspectors but also supervisors and management people have the above problems at the Braidwood Construction Site.
- 3) My Concern If my integrity is in question, then I have but one recourse,. as I believe you will agree, first I will request - no, I will demand - a complete reinspection of all my documented inspections from the date I was first certified at Braidwood, December 22, 1983 to March 26, 1986. I will require the total number of inspections, total number of welds -
total number of accepted and total number rejected. This being after Comstock and Commonwealth Diison has declared welds sufficiently clean as not to impair visual inspection. I will send along some AVO copies in question for you to evaluate as to what is requested, with no training and very little instruction supervision. I will also allow time - up to 180 days for a reply to the above request. If at the end of that time some party associated with the construction of the Braidwood Project has not answered, then I will be compelled to have the NLRB or others look into the so called procedure violation.
6)
A copy of this letter has been attached to my deposition to Isham, Lincoln, and Beals and to the,Ditervenor - BPI along with other material Y
related to my training - like training - supervision, etc.
Res e fully, t
k h ert D. Hunter
_-=suwm e hw *