ML20213E467
| ML20213E467 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 07/19/1983 |
| From: | Berlinger C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Thomas C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| CON-WNP-0601, CON-WNP-601 NUDOCS 8307270431 | |
| Download: ML20213E467 (3) | |
Text
-
N.
JUL 19 E f:E 'OPA" dix 1 FOR:
Cecil G. Thonas, Chief Standardization and Special Projects I. ranch, CL FP9!!:
Carl H. Berlinner, Chief Core Perfomance I! ranch, DSI
SUBJECT:
TECHL!ICAL SPECIFICATI0f!S FOR UrlP2 The Core Perfomance " ranch has reviewed the proof and review cony of Technical Srecifications for '!ashington f'uclear Pro.fect-Unit 2.
Fnclosure 1 is a list nf the specifications reviewed and Enclosure 2 contains our coments.
Other specifications are accentable, as written.
?I!N 2.
P 1 '"T
- yG Carl u. lierlinger, Chief Core Perfornance Cranch, DSI
Enclosures:
As stated cc:
R. l'attson L. Putenstain D. Eisenhut T. flovat D. Hoffman R. Capra l
Contact:
P. Brool:s, CPD:DSI S. Sun, CPB:DSI X-29490 X-29499 CPB:rf C. BERLINGER D. FIEN0 L. PHILLIPS l
W. BROOKS I/)
i S.
1 8307270431 830719
~b77'
- .AD.QCK 0500Qg7
=-
k /P n /I D BR00K :
... 5.5.L.
...T.P.RES.I.2C.
OFFICE)U
......T s DFIEN0 SSUN;........... '....... ~....
LPHILLIPS
.C..B. E..RL I N. G..E.R.....
SURNAME [7/ //...............
....../..... /8 3.........$............
/83 7/
7/
../../...../. 8 3
.. 7../....P.i../. 8. 3...
...../..,/.../ 8 3 7
~
me,
-mawuameswwt
4 Specifications Reviewed Definitions:
1.2, 1.3, 1.8, 1.13, 1.14, 1.19, 1.20, 1.22, 1.25, 1.29, 1.34 1.37, 1.39, 1.44, and 1. 45.
Specifications:
2.1.1 2.1.2 2.2.1 (IRM and APRM only) 3/4.1.1 3/4.1.2 3/4.1.3.1 3/4.1.3.2 3/4.1.3.3 3/4.1.3.4 3/4.1.3.5 3/4.1.3.6 3/4.1.3.7 3/4.1.3.8 3/4.1.4.1 3/4.1.4.2 3/4.1.4.3 3/4.1.5 3/4.2.2 3/4.2.3 3/4.2.4 3/4.3.1 (IRM and APRM only) 3/4.3.6 3/4.3.7.6 3/4.3.7.7 3/4.3.7.12 3/4.4.1.1 3/4.9.1 3/4.9.2 3/4.9.3 3/4.9.10.1 3/4.9.10.2 3/4.10.1
~
1 3/4.10.2 3/4.10.3 i
Comments On Specifications 1.
Bases for 2.2.1.2 (last sentence)
MFLP0 should be MFLPD.
2.
Specification 3/4.2.2 The symbol Q in the formula for the scram trip setpoint appears to be superfluous.
3.
Specification 3/4.2.3 The term MCPR is undefined (perhaps MCPRxK ).
f f
There is a discrepancy between Figure 3.2.3-1 and the Bases with respect to the assumed operating limit MCPR (1.24 on the figure and 1.20 in the Bases).
4.
Table 3.3.6-1 There appears to be a gap of 10 percent in power between the required operation of the RSCS (20 percent) and the RBM (30%).
Is this intended to account for uncertainties to prevent simultaneous operation of both?
The gap is technically acceptable.
5.
General There is a discrepancy in the page numbers in the index beginning at page 3/4.3-10.
l l
\\
l t
i
.