ML20213E304
| ML20213E304 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 12/07/1982 |
| From: | Johnston W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Novak T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| CON-WNP-0557, CON-WNP-557 NUDOCS 8212130019 | |
| Download: ML20213E304 (3) | |
Text
,
Distribution EQB R/F CDocket Files DEC 0 71982 50-397 fiEMORAfiDUf! FOR: Thomas Novak, Assistant Director for Licensing, DL FROM:
William Johnston, Assistant Director for Materials and Qualifications Engineering, DE SUDJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITI0l!AL IflFORMATI0ft - REVIEU OF WNP-2 ENVIRONMEf!TAL EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION REPORT FOR SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT Plant flame:
W1P-2 Docket No.:
50-397 Responsible Branch and Project Manager:
LB-2, R. Auluck Review Status: Additional Infonnation Required The Equipment Qualifications Branch (EQB), Division of Engineering has reviewed the WilP-2 Environmental Equipment Qualification Report for safety-related equipment and has detemined that additional infomation is required.
The specific infomation needed is described in Enclosure 1.
This information must be provided before a site audit can be scheduled. Please~ note that Item 10 in Enclosure 1, may be handled independently of the site audit.
(/u&!, ). $cm William V. Johnston, Assistant Director p for Materials and Qualifications Engineering Y
Division of Engineering
Enclosure:
v As stated cc:
R. Vollmer V. Noonan R. Auluck.
R. LaGrange EQ Section Max Yost, EG&G Randy Holloway, EG&G
/
CONTACT:
A. t!asciantonio, URR
/
. 28205
/
8 12130019 821207
' [/
/
ADOCK 05000397
/
/j m
... MQE,: DE I
omad E B:DE l.,EQB:DE94 L..j..E.QB;.DE.
antonio..RLaGrange -l VNo
. c m
i i
/
4/
j 5"
14 5 hUJopston" n"
""..12.t.us2
.. 1.2a./.82....,. 1.2/. 7/s2..
.12/.p.82.....
... ". ".....j......
i GeQC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 024o OFFICIAL REdORD COPY
ENCLO!URE 1 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1.
Compam and correlate the systems described in Table 3.2-1 of the FSAR with the master systems list in the September 1982 program. Where systems have been omitted from the harsh environment qualification program provide the basis (e.g., not required for safe shutdown or accident mitigation).
Identify the class IE functions for each system.
2.
Identify, by categories listed in NUREG-0737, the components (plant tag number and/or manufacturer and model number) included in the qualification program in response to TMI Action Plan Requirements.
3.
Provide a statement that flooding and aging analyses have been sufficiently completed.
4.
Provide a statement that lE equipment located in areas which experience a significant increase in radiation during a LOCA has been reviewed for possible damage to solid state devices.
5.
Indicate that the " accuracy" infonnation missing from the summary sheets, Appendix C, as well as other pertinent information, will be available at time of audit.
6.
Indicate that the effects of Beta radiation have been included in the qualification program.
7.
In accordance with the Comission Memorandum and Order CLI-80-21, dated May 23, 1980, indicate that replacement parts will be qualified to NUREG-0588 Category I requirements unless sound reasons to the contrary exist.
i 8.
Indicate that the minimum set of safety equipment to provide a single success path to achieve the required safety functions will be qualified, or adequate justification will be provided, prior to fuel load.
9.
Indicate that safety equipment located inside primary containment has been qualified to the temperature / pressure profile described in Table 3.11-2
/
of the FSAR or provide justification.
- 10. Before the Safety Related Mechanical (SRM) equipment audit items can be selected, the applicant must provide a statement that all SRM equipment in a harsh environment is included in the mechanical equipment qualification program and must indicate the qualification status of the SRM equipment.
If qualification is not complete, briefly describe the tasks to be performed.
Provide a list of SRM equipment which is considered qualified from which audit items may be selected. Your review of equipment should be essentially complete before items are selected. The staff review will concentrate on materials which are sensitive to environmental effects, for example, seals, gaskets, lubricants, fluids for hydraulic systems, diaphragms.
l l
1
_ _. _ _