ML20213E300
| ML20213E300 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia |
| Issue date: | 10/21/1982 |
| From: | Stoddart P Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Rajender Auluck NRC |
| References | |
| CON-WNP-0550, CON-WNP-55, CON-WNP-550 NUDOCS 8211180571 | |
| Download: ML20213E300 (4) | |
Text
..
e bcCh0*
~
0CT 211922 Deck et '!o. 50-397 tiOTE TO:
R. Auluck, Project !!anager, ',mP-2 FRCM:
P. Stoddart, Muclear Engineer Ef fluent Treat ent Systems Branch, DSI
SUBJECT:
RAC!lASTE SYSTEM PAP.A. ETERS FOR '.:?iP-7.
P.EFERE!'CE: !'erorandum, J. F. Don ~ hue to D. !!. f reeller, ACRS, October 4,1982 The referenced menorandun points out differences in raduaste syston parareters between those used in the evaluation of WP-7. and those used to evaluate three otber plants.
In one case, the difference was due to a typocraphical error.
In each of the other cases, differences are attributable to variables in systen desian and use of specific cornonents, as well as to acceptable variations in assur.ptions as to the fractions of nrocessed fluids to be released.
Systen parareters for P'.ms are detailed in t't:P.EG-0016, P.ev.1, January 197G.
Dif ferences pointed out in the acrorandum are discussed belo.4, in accordance with your request of Cctober 14, 1962.
Iter 1:
! PIP-2 LaSalle 7
Kr Adsorptio_n Coefficient 105 1.85x10 Kr lioldup Tine 1.8 0
Xe Adsorption Coef ficient 2410 3.0x10 Xe !!aldup Tire 42.6 P.ESPO!!SE:
There was a typographical error in tre LaSalle SER for the adsn..-
tion coef ficients for Xe and Kr. The correct values should be Xr: 18.5 cn /cm 3
(at an operatinq tencerature of 77*F and a dew coint of 45'F) and Xe: 330 cn /qn (at an operating temnerature of 77*F and a dew point of 45*F).
The di fference between the corrected values and those of !!!!P-2 lies in the design of the LaSalle systen, which operates with an anhient terperature charcoal hed, while the @sien of the !WP-2 svsten calls for a refriqerated charcoal bed eneratino at a nrinal OT and a -20*F deu point. The refrigerated charcoal bed Provides for 3 sub-stantially loncer boldup tire for Xe and l'.r.
See Mt! PEG-0016, rev.1, Janmry 1973 for discussion of parareter values.
7,M
<211180571 021021.
% eP-ADOCK-00000397~j l
8 o,,.
$U".N *.ME )
rua>
Ec o@rm eco pe.csym m OFFICIA6 RECORD C@PV
. m m.- w.-
- n. Auluck OCT 211982 Iten 2:
Liquid Ra6saste Systems Chenical Vastes MNP-2 LaSalle Zimer IMtch-2 Flow (god) 600 6200 4500 3500 Releases (qpd) 60 620 450 3500 DF I
100 10 0F Cs 100 10 3
CF Others 100 10 RESP 0!iSL: A ficw of 600 spd is projected for R!P-2, based on aoplicant's systen descriptions and on HUREG-0016 paraneter values. Fren T1ble 1-4 of HUREG-0016, the staff's volumes attributabic to this systen total only 600 gpd, consisting of 500 god of lab drains and 100 gpd of chenical lab waste. Since the apolicant predicts a substantial portion of the input to be due to deter-cents and decontanination solutions, and plans to process detert!cnt laundry wastes in the sane systen, we assigned a 0F of 100 to the systen evaporator in accordance with Table 1-5 of HUREG-0016. 'n!P-2 does not reqenerate rad-waste deninerali:ers and therefore has no reqenerant solution inouts
(~ 3,400 cod) as in the cases of LaSalle, Hatch-2, and Zirrwr.
'!'IP-2, LaSalle,
and Zineer each predict the discharge of 10% of processed solutions and the recycle of 007..
Hatch-2 plans to discharne 10C", of processed solutions.
Also, the LaSalle systen values represent tuo units.
Iten 3:
Linuid Radwaste Systens Equipnent Drain Systen
'mP-2 LaSalle Zimer Hatch-2 Flow (gpd) 20,000 55,600 17,500 25,000 Releases (gpd) 200 2,780 375 250 orrice >
suas4un>
o4ta p
.nc ronu m po m.veu em OFFICIAL R ECORD COPY wa ou-m >u
R. AulucL OCT 21 1982 Iten 3:
(continued) lHIP-2 LaSalle Zimer Hatch-2 DF I
100 100 CF Cs 10 10 DF Others 100 100 f.CSPCI'SE: W!!P-2 and Hatch-2 cach project that they will recycle 99~', of this stream for re-use in the plant and will discharge IL LaSalle and Zicrer each assured that 95% of the orncessed fluid will be re-used in the olant and 5':, will 1:e discharged.
In each case, the staf f found tt ese assu~ntions 1cceptable and used the sare values in the staff evaluations. The 7.inrcr systen uses two mixed bed denineralizers in series, while the other plants use only a single domineralizer in the treatment syster.
Iten 4:
Liquid Padwaste Systens Flone Drain Systen tmP-2 LaSalle Zirrer Hatch-2 Flow (gnd) 5,700 10,600 5,000 2,000 Releases (qnd) 570 1,000 5,000 280 4
DF 1
100 10 5
CF Cs 2
10 5
CF Others 100 10 P. ESP 0 HSE :
Tbc floor drain treat mnt system for in:P-2 and Hatch-2 consists of a filter and a single nixed bed domineralizer, with tntal DFs of 100 for iodine, 2 for costun, and 100 for other nuclidos. LaSalle croloys a filter,
(
C P #IC E )
sunecc )
oun>
(c rcnu mpt ncu cm OFFICIAL RECORD COPY u.w nii-m m y
a P. Auluck OCT 211582 evaoorator, and co'Jlishing denineralizer for tot 31 [Fs of 10 for iodi o.o,10 for cesium and 10 for other nuclides.
Zirrer also projccts 1C7; rnicase of processed fluid while each of the other plants as;ure Oct re.ycle and 10% release of processed fluid.
In each case, the esse stiar.s wor? accep'.able and were used in the staff's evaluation.
Cricinal sicned by4 Phillip C. Stor1 dart, Nucle ir Enr.ineer Ef fluent Treatrent Systers Br. inch Division of Systms Intcaration cc:
R. Mattson R. Capra
'f. Houston A. Schuencer D. ?'oeller, ACRS J. Donogbue, ACRS Follow t'. Ga" nill C. tiillis P. Stoddart DISTRIBUTION:
Docket File 50-397 ETSB Reading File ETSB Docket File ADRP Reading File
..s
\\
o,ne,) O...S..I..:..R..P..;.E..T..S..B...
.D..S..I... P 7.. 5. 0...
g g,,, y "Stoddart:dj WP am ill P
" " ' " " " ' " " " ~ '
10720787 "" "l'0/ p//87"'
oor>
~
,,4c rem.i ais iu m r.n a.i x OFFICIAL RICORD COPY 5
m.
.