ML20213E277
| ML20213E277 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 10/01/1982 |
| From: | Novak T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Johnston W, Rubenstein L, Rubenstein L, Speis T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| CON-WNP-0546, CON-WNP-546 NUDOCS 8211020199 | |
| Download: ML20213E277 (4) | |
Text
.
urSTRIBuIION:
LR#2 Reading RAuluck 0G 01 IS$
ASchwencer TMNovak MEMORANDUM FOR:
W. V. Johnston; Assistant Director for Materials & Qualifications Engineering, DE L. R. Rubenstein, Assistant Director for Core & Plant Systems Branch, DSI T. P. Speis, Assistant Director for Reactor Safety, DSI J. P. Knight, Assistant Director for Components & Structures Engineering, CE U. Houston, Assistant Director for Radiation Protection, DSI B. K. Grimes, Director Division of Emergency Preparedness, ILE J. J. Kramer, Deputy Director DHFS FROM:
T. M. Novak, Assistant Director for Licensing, DL
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR STAFF ASSISTANCE AT THE ACRS FULL COPPITTEE MEETING ON WNP-2
~ACRS Full Committee meeting on WNP-2 will be held in Washington, D. C. on Thursday, October 7,1982 at 8:45 AM. Your presence is required at this Full Conmittee meeting which will cover the full scope of our OL review.
The ACRS Subcommittee meeting on WNP-2 was held in Richland, WA on September 2 and 3,1982 Although we do not yet have the agenda for the Full Committee meeting (it will be distributed when received), several general and specific inquiries were made by the ACRS at this Subcommittee meeting which are candi-dates for discussion at the Full Committee meeting (see the attachment for a description of these matters). The project manager has already transmitted this information to the appropriate reviewers.
It is required that these members be in attendance at this Full Connittee meeting to respond to questions that may be raised during the NRC Report and applicant's presentation.
Yourare further requested to advise the project manager, R. Auluck (x29778), no later than October 6,1982, ori the current review status of all the open and conffiFator -items identified in SSER #1.
(
T w D211020199 e g g W ADoc r05oooa97
-eF-YF
//
OFFICE)
SURN W )
oare )
Ic ronu vs o>sa) uncu ma HFFICIAL RECORD COPY e e-m uo
W. V. Johnston L. R. Rubenstein T. P. Speis J. P. Knight
- 11. Houston B. K. Grimes J. J. Kramer Your cooperation and immediate attention to this request will be most appreciated.
Origine.1 signed by:
n.ms :4. 77. r.'c T. M. Novak, Assistant Director for Licensing Division of Licensing, NRR
Attachment:
As stated cc: See next page D..L..:..L..B..#. 2../,Pg......
.D..L...:.L..B.. #.2.. M....
..D.L...:. A..D./..L........
omee >
... s...
su. me >.RA.,tn, u..cV..:.kwAS c h..w...e..n c'e.f....
T.M.No...v..a..L
../.0 /82 r.'
9
.../.>4./. 82
'..../;- { /82 oare >
me renu vs r.c eos nacu e:u O F FLCI A L.
R E C O fM F@ @@@W moe 'm'-n3 m
Attachment ISSUES RAISED AT ACRS SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING ON WNP-2 1.
Comparison of free standing steel containment-(WNP-2) with reinforced concrete containment. Which one is better? (SEB) 2.
Corrections to Table 1.2 of SER.
(DL,CPB) 3.
Adequacy of the RHR pumps.
(RSB) 4 Status of the new review procedure for turbine nissile.
(MtEB) 5 Channel box deflection and fuel box lifting were addressed separately. What would happen if plant had a LOCA and had the pressure that would push this channel box wall against the cruci form? (CPB) 6.
Damage to the control rod drive lines as a result of failure in other high pressure lines.
(ASS) 7.
Effect on pieces of equipment fron flow through a doorway (indirect flow) from a pipe break in a adjoining room. This is different than the direct jet impingement effect. ((E03) 8.
Adqquacy of " type-testing" of SRV solenoid valves for environmental qualifications by the electrical industry.
(EQB) 9.
Reason for applicant choosing multiplexing system for controlling standby service water system. Uhy are the complications of multi-plexing even admitted for a review? (ICSB)
- 10. Control system failures. The scope of the study should he extended to control and safety systems intermixed with the same sensor information,
- 11. ATWS. What happens to the reactor power if the rods are fully withdrawn and the recirculation pumps coast to where the power drops not to 20 or 30 percent but hangs up at 40 to 50 percent? Uhat happens to core stability? (RSB)
Note: Each affected reviewer has been given a copy of the ACRS meeting transcript of the pages where the above concerns were discussed.
OFFICE >
sucmAuE>
D AVE )
.RC FC11M 318 03-60) NRCM CMJ OFFiClAL RECORD COPY w.m e--mw
cc w/ attachment:
D. Eisenhut/R. Purple, DL R. Engelken, Region V M. Srinivasan, PSB
- 0. Parr, ASB F. Rosa, ICSB B. Sheron, RSB R. Houston, AEB F. Congel, RAR W. Butler, CSB C. Berlinger, CPB R. Bosnak, MEB F. Schauer, SEB W. Hazelton, MTEB V. Benaroya, CMEB Z. Rosztoczy, EQB ll. Haass, QAB D. Vassallo, LQB V. Moore, HFEB D. Ziemann, PTRB F. Pagano, EPLB D. Skovholt, LGB G. McCorkle, SGPL D. Beckhams, OLB W. Regan, SAB D. Sternberg, Region V R. Dodds, Region V Staff Reviewers Requested to Attend Peetino or 9e Represented by Supervisors S. Rhow, PSB R. Giardina, PSB J. Ridgely, ASB i
J. Rosenthal, ICSB T. Collins, RSB F. Eltawila, CSB M. Tokar, CPB W. Brooks, CPB R. Li, PEB K. C. Leu, SEB I. Alteman, GSB J. Kimball, GSB M. Hum, MTEB D. Kubicki, CEB T. Y. Chang, EOS B. Bottimore, DL M. Gaitants, EQB omer >
... ~........ ~.
... ~.. - -.... ~
$UANCE)
.......m...m m m
.*m.
- m. m e.*
own>
.. ~.... ~ ~ ~
... -... ~...
.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
pc ronu ais pow > sac.u em OFFIClAL RECORD COPY czm on-m-+