ML20213E234
| ML20213E234 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 08/19/1982 |
| From: | Rajender Auluck Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| CON-WNP-0541, CON-WNP-541 NUDOCS 8208270659 | |
| Download: ML20213E234 (7) | |
Text
_
DISTRIP"~ ION:
AU9 19 1992 RAuluck
, y; EHylton
(# ) ' ? ' '
FEltawila, CSB JRidgely, ASB MEMORAf!DU.". FDR: Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director $CoHins,RSB 1, MEB Division of Licensing SBrocoum, GSB Roger J. Mattson, Director JHalapatz, fiHEB Division of Systems Integration B
Richard H. Vollmer, Director DKubicki, CHEB Division of Engineering FAllenspach, LQd o'
Hugh L. Thomp&on, Director Division of Human Factors Safety 3rian K. Grimes, Director Division of Emergency Preparedness THRU:
Thomas H. tiovak -Assistant Director for Licensing Division of Licensing A. Schdencer, Chief i
licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing FP.0H:
R. Auluck, Project Manager Licensing Branch flo. 2 Division of Licensing SU3 JECT:
flRR I!!PUT TQ SALP - LINP 2 Attached is a draft of the NRR input for the SALP for Washington Public Powcr Supply System, Project flo. 2.
This draft report is based partly upon input solicited from selected staff personnel who have had substantial contact and involvement with WilP-2's licensing activities.
Please review the draft evaluation and provide any comments you feel appropriate. All cc:ments received by August 25, 1982 will be considered in the final report.
+
To assist you with your review and comment, the names of the flRR persons contacted for input are given in Enclosure 1.
}
R. Auluck, Project Manager se:C v ~e270659 820319ADCCR_050003f7'- Division of Licersing Licensing Branch flo. 2
.e-. :
1.
List of flames 2.
Evaluation liatrix 3.
Input for SALP Report DL:Lar2/Pt1 i DtullL*2/BC DL:AD/L RA u l u c k.................l4.
TNovak omcn
............. ~ ~ >
- pt ASchwencer sunuaue)
..-..s.............
8./...',.J./. 8. 2
.../..l.1/. 82 8/..../.82 8
osre >
.......... ~..
.... ~ ~ ~...
sc rcnu ne ou.a nn:u mo CFFICIAt RECORD COPY uo 2 mi-u m
ENCLOS
- 1 Overall Rating Category F. Eltawila CSB 1
J. Ridgely ASB 1
R. Li HEB 1
T. Collins RSB 2
S. Brocoum GSB 1
J. Halapatz Mt EB 1
M. Hum Mt EB 1
F. Witt CHEB 2
- 0. Kubicki CHEB 2
F. Allenspach LQB 2
s 9
9
=gg p
g,
_9
i' Encics.ure 2'.
LICEll5ING ACTIVITIES, 6.-
o s
1 t.
Evaluation
.0l.. '
3 Criteria MEB G5ff
'CSB RSB r' - ASB
~
~'
1 1.
Management 1
1 2
1 1
Involvement j.
2 Approach to 1
1 1
2 2
i Resolution of f).'
Tc'chnical Issues J.
.g.
s in i',
3.
Responsiveness 1
1 V1 2
2
,1 -
l 4.
Enforcement llistory r.';j;-
5.
Rer,artable Events 6
Sta f fing 2
7 Tra ining l
eO 8
e L '.
j
.i 1
1 1
1 3
I
Enclos.ure 2'.
~
1 LICENSINfi ACTIVITIES,
. -]. -
s-d, d Evaluation CHEB i
.CiiEB ~ ( Post _
Mteb.
.J4teb.
LQB '
a j,.
Criteria (Fire Protect. ) Accident Sarnpling) (Inservice Inspect) (Materials)
?-
- 4. *,
2 f'
1.
Management 1
1 l
d,.
Involvement j 'g' 2.
Approach to 2
2 1
1 2
U Resolution of Tdchnical Issues 4;.
'.l!
' rs
' f.
3 Responsiveness 1'
2 2
1 2
g i..
't 4.
Enforcement lit story I
t 5.
Reportable Events 6
Sta f fing
)
"l :
' 7 Tra inin9 2
I i
t lg.
c e
4 1
e t
O
o ceg
@EL99%@tOJ UNITED STATES
- ; 'e g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
?~
- j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
\\.".~./ /
Auf? ! 9 1997 Facility Name:
WNP-2 Licensee:
Washington Public Power Supply System NRR Project Manager: Rajender Auluck I.
Introduction This report presents the results of an evaluation of the licensee, Washington Public Power Supply System in the functional area of licensing activities.
It is intended to provide NRR's input to the SALP review process as described in NRC Manual Chapter 0516. The review covers the period July 1,1981 to June 30, 1982.
The basic approach used for this evaluation was to first select a number of licensing issues which involved a significant amount of staff manpower.
Comments were then solicited from the staff.
- Finally, this information was assembled in a matrix which allowed an overall evaluation of the licensee's performance. This evaluation is based on staff input from eight review activities.
II. Summary of Results NRC Manual Chapter 0516 specifies that each functional area evaluated will be assigned a performance category based on a number of factors.
The single final rating was determined through integration of the opinions received from the NRR reviewers and the judgement of the project manager.
Based on this approach, the performance of Washington Public Power Supply System in the functional area " Licensing Activities" is rated category 1.
III.
Criteria Evaluation criteria, as given in NRC Manual Chapter Appendix 0516 Table 1, were used for this evaluation.
IV.
Performance Analysis The licensee's performance evaluation is based on a consideration of seven attributes as given in the NRC Manual Chapter.
For most of the licensing actions considered in this evaluation only three or four of the attributes were of significance.
Therefore, the composite rating is heavily based on the following attributes.
(1) Management involvement (2) Approach to resolution of technical issues (3) Responsiveness g.
-,. ~, r _ _, -
With the exception of Enforcement History for which there was no basis within NRR for evaluation, the remaining'. attributes:of staffing and Reportable Events were judged to apply only to a few licensing activities.
However, staffing was considered as a unique licensing activity, under licensee qualifications.
The performance analysis was based on our evaluation of the following licensing activities:
Licensee Qualification Containment Systems Auxiliary Systems Reactor Systems Haterials Engineering Chemical Engineering Geology / Seismology The level of licensing activity during the review period was used as a criterion in choosing the functional areas considered in this evaluation.
A.
Management Involvement and Control in Assuring Quality The overall rating for this criterion is category 1.
There is evidence of planning and assignment of priorities and decision making seems to be at a level that ensures management review.
Management involvement was articularly evident in resolvin NRR and 1)nited States.Geolo ical. Survey-(USGS) concerns in' g the the geological and seismologica areas.
~
B.
Approach to Resolution of Technical Issues from a Safety Standpoint The overall rating for this criterion is category 1.
This was particulary evident in the containment systems area where the-licensee undertook a major evaluation effort to justify deviation ~
from generic resolution in the pool dynamics area.
C.
Responsiveness to NRR Initiatives The overall rating for this criterion is category 1.
Responses to NRC review questions on FSAR submittals were usually delivered within the time frame specified.
In a few cases, NRC request dates were missed due either to the quantity of effort required or to the licensee's uncertainty of the NRC request.
This was true in the geology / seismology review area.
However, the final responses were of good quality.
The licensee makes a concerted effort to be very responsive.
D.
Enforcement History There is no basis for an NRR evaluation of this criterion.
9
' Wm_W
.."WW9N
-7
' E.
Reportable Events At present there is no basis for an NRR evaluation of this criterion.
F.
Staffing This criterion was evaluated by Licensee Qualification Branch and is given a rating of category 1.
The licensee has already filled the key and other staff positions.
G.
Training This criterton was also. evaluated by Licensee Qualification Branch and is given a rating of category 2.
A defined training program is implemented for the licensee staff.
-V.
Conclusions Based on the evaluation of five of the seven attributes listed in the NRC Manual for a number of significant licensing activities, an overall rating of category 1 is given to Washington Public Power Supply System with regard to their project No. 2.
The licensee has been characterized by NRR as being knowledgeable, cooperative, technically competent and responsive in the area of licensing activities, i
l l
l l
l l
t