ML20213E169
| ML20213E169 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 06/03/1982 |
| From: | Rubenstein L, Rubenstein R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Tedesco R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| CON-WNP-0522, CON-WNP-522 NUDOCS 8206100072 | |
| Download: ML20213E169 (7) | |
Text
..
O_is tri bu tion :
LSRubenstein Docket ifo: 50-397 fEMORAtlDUM FOR: Robert L. Tedesco, Assistant Director for Licensing, CL FROM:
L. S. Rubenstein, Assistant Director for Core and Plant Systems, OSI
SUBJECT:
SUPPLEMENT TO CHAPTER 9, SAFETY EVALUATIOl1 REPORT -
WPPSS fiUCLEAR PROJECT NO. 2
,g l c 9
Plant flame: HPPSS tluclear Project tio. 2
.. ^ ~ ~ ' '
- NG
(@G Licensee: Washington Public Power Supply System 3,
Cocket flo: 50-397 2f c.y 3 $1982 # C Licensing Stage: OL
- a 1
C. M %,f') WHA Project Manager:
R. Auluck s
Systems Integration Branch: Power Systems
/,
PSB Reviewers:
S. Rhow/R. Giardina G
Review Status: Awaiting Infomation
/ %1iM' The enclosed Supplement to the Safety Evaluation for the Wr!P flo. 2 covers the engine skid mounted auxiliary systgm piping and diesel 9ngine prelubri-cation. He have found the applicant's design acceptable as noted.
The verification of the hydrostatic testing for the CG auxilibry, systems piping is to be performed by the Regional Office of Inspection and Enforcement (0IE).
It is thus recommended that 01E be formally requested to perform the subject verification.
We, therefore, consider the open items in Chapter 9 on quality group classifica-tion and prelubrication of the diesel generator in our February 15, 1932 memorandum cle: sed.
0:fginal signed b5 J+.L InbonstoL7 jj L. S. Rubenstein, Assistant Director for Core and Plant Systems Division of Systems In tegration
Enclosure:
As Stated cc: ike page 2 ya
Contact:
82061000 7 820603 -
R. Giard a'CTL-ADOCK_05000397 v?caQ4
.GP f1
..AS.O.PS3,,d fB
',,R6, &.,,,,,,
I omco
.RGiardina :pn niv A n Ls tei n
. sunn:a O l
.. 95L.7.:.. 482 06./..L....zg2 164.2,ct82..
.3.9/.. 3....../.82 om>
ccummuntmuencese
.u-R:bcrt L. Tedesco JUN 3
.%2 cc w/ enclosure:
R. Mattson R. Capra S. Boyd P. Triplett A. Schwencif R. Auluck it. Srinivasan J. Knight A. Ungaro R. Giardina S. Show I
l l
l OFFICE )
na.on".
sunnaue)
..... ~. ~... ~...
. ~ ~ ~.... - -.
cars >
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.
- - ~ ~
' c roast sia tio-ec3 sacsi c 4a OFFICIAL RECCRD COPY usce m-p
SUPPLEMENT TO CHAPTER 9 SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT WPPSS NUCLE AR PROJECT NO. 2 9.5.7 EMERGENCY DIESEL ENGINE LUBRICATION SYSTEM As statgd in the SER the preheat Lub ri c a t i on system for the HPCS diesel engine is composed of a continuously operating ac pump and a standby de pump which prelub ricate the turbocharge r bearings cnly.
The othe r wearing parts of th e engide do not receive any Lub ri c at i on un t il after the engine starts and the engine-driven tube oil pumps reach full speed.
This is not acceptable.
The-staff requires a prelubrication of the diesel enginese since dry starting of the diese L engines under eme rgency conditions wilL result in momentary lack of Lubrication at the various moving parts (this can eventually lead To f ailures and resultant equip-ment unavailability).
The applicant was informed of this problem at a meeting in Bethesda on December 10, 1981.
In the LRG-II position paper dated March 12e 1982 and confirmed at the December 10, 1981 meeting the applicant stated that he wilL implement GE-EMD-MI-9644, the manufacturer's re c ommen da t i on e to correct the staff concern.
Howevere the manuf acture r's recommended "fix" does not totally alleviate the. problem of dry starting of the enginer in that onLy the wearing parts located in the lower half of the engine are Lubricated.
Thuse the staff finds modification onLy partially acceptable as a means of minimizing dry engine starts.
The applicant was informed of the probtem..
Until an adequate manufacturer's modification is approved by the staffe we require the applicant to manually preLubricate the diesel I
b.
engines in accordance with th e manuf actu re r 's recommendations at least once a week and bef ore each manbal diesel engine start.
The weekly prelubrication wi L L deposit in a film of Lubricant on the. engine wearing surfaces.
The staff finds'this procedure acceptable as a means of mimimizing dry engine s 't a r t s and wilL incorporate this requirement into t he Technic al Speci fications.
This requirement has been discussed with th'e applicant and he confirms compliance.
Based on our reviews we conclude t h at the emergency diesel engine preheat lub ri cating oil system meets the requirements of General Design C ri te ri a 2, 4, 5 and 17, mee t s th e guidance of the cited Regulatory Guides and S t anda rd Revi ew P l an 9.5.7, it can perform its design safety function and meets the recommendations of NUREG/CR-0660 and industry codes and standards, and is theref ore
- acceptable.
O O
9.'5.4.2 - 9.5.8 Emeroency Diesel Engine Fuel Oil, Coctine Wata e adr 9+=atine, Lub ri c at i on and Combustion Air Intake and Exhaust Systems Th e.a pp li c an t in a letter dated May 25, 1982 p'rovided the stan-dards to which the engine skid mounted auxiliary systems (fuel oili cooling waters air startinge Lubrication and combustion air
~
intake and exhaust) piping and associated components were designed.
This engine mounted piping and the associated components, such as valvesi fabricated headerse f abricated special fittings, and the like are designede manufacturede and inspected in accordance wit h -the guidelines and requirements of ANSI Standard B31.1e " Code f or P ressure Piping," ANSI N45.2i " Quality Assurance Program Requirements f or Nuclear Faciliti'es" and 10 CFR 50 Appendix B.
The engine skid mounted auxiliary system piping and associated components are intentionally overdesigned (subjected to low working st re s se s) for the applications and thereby resulting in high operational reliability.
The applicant also provided a c omp a ri s on of their design with the requirements of ASME Section III Class 3.
The resu.lts of the comparison indicates they differ from ASME l
i Section III Class 3 in two areas as follows:
1.
ASME requires liquid penetrant examination for welds over l
4" IPS.
The applicant stated that only-a few welds in cooling water system piping 4" and over were not liquid penetrant examinede in those few cases welds were only vi.sually examined with system at design pressure and temperature for accepta-bility of weld.
We find this partially acceptable.
. to 125 percent of the design 2.
ASME requires a hydrostatic test The applicant stated some piping and components pressure.
of design pressur'e tested to 150 pe rcent were hydrostaticalLy and that the rest of the piping would be l'e a k tested at We find this operating pressure during engine operation.
partially ac cept ab Le.
examination of alL piping Lieu of performing liquid penetrant In all pipings we onLy and the hydrostatic tests on 4"
and over system piping be hydro-alL diesel engine auxiliary require that statically tested to a minimum of 125 percent of design pressu hydrostatic tests will Because of the low working stresses on the tightness and weld in-provide adequate assurance of piping Leak the tests are verified by tegrity.
The staff requests that these (OIE).
The design of Inspection and Enforcement l
regional' Office system piping and components engine skid mounted auxiliary of the to the cited design philosophy and standards is consider III Class 3 requirements designed'to ASME Section Lent to a system and inservice functional operability with regard to system reliability.
I conclude that the the engine mounted Based on our reviews we diesel engine auxiliary piping and components of emergency
-systems (fuel oile cooling watere air st a rt in ge Lubri l
l
combustion air intake and exhaust systems) meet the requirements of General Design Criteria 2e 4r 5 and its meet the guidance of the cited Regulatory Guides and Standard Review Planse they can' perform their design safety function an d m e e t 't h e re c ommen d at i on s of NUREG/CR-0660 and industry codes and standards, and on comple-tion of the hyd'rostatic tests are therefore acceptable.
I l
{
r 6
DTSTRidD JN:
See next page d83 d.
i et 9
'o a
q:
h%
MEMORANDUM FOR:
A. Schwencer, Chief
-4
$ 0,. C b Licensing Brarch No. 2 k ' %.,%
Division of Licensing g
- 45 y FROM:
R. Auluck, Project Manager OI Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF MEETING WITH WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM (WPPSS) TO DISCUSS OPEN ISSUES IN THE GE0 LOGY AND SEISMOLOGY AREA A meeting was held in Bethesda, Maryland, on May 18, 1982, with Washington Public Power Supply System to discuss the outstanding issues in the geology and seismology area.
An attendance list, a copy of the meeting agenda and conclusions of the information provided on Southeast Anticline fault are attached.
The followup in the brief summary of the items discussed.
. Item 1.
Southeast Anticline Fault.
The applicant described the infomation obtained from the cores of 5 closely i
spaced holes. The data from these holes further indicated that the fault has a revers sense of movement, strikes N 39*'.4 and di ps 30*SW. Based on these and other observations, such as the observation that the Ringold formation and Pre-Missoula sediments are not offset, the applicant concluded that the Southeast Antincline fault has not been ac tve for approximately 10 million years.
The applicant committed to provide the following information in this area:
a.
Complete documentation on the Southeast Anticline fault by June 4.
l The applicant provided this information on June 2,1982.
l b.
The structural relationship question, i.e., why should Southeast Anticline fault not be considered capable when the Ce1 tral fault and North-dipping reverse fault are capable.
- ccc;;ees+t. 820507 PDR ADOCK 05000397 A
PDR O F FICE )
$URNAME) e4ve )
sc ronu ais oo-soi Nacu cao OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
~
usx mi-mw
.z.
Item 2.
Cochra 's Geographical Data.
n The NRC staff is considering this concern as a confirmatory item only but will need the following information to close this item:
a.
Plot profiles on topographic map.
b.
Explanation of the anamoly.
c.
Complete documentation.
d.
Date of submittal of the above information.
Item 3.
Moxee - Wenas Valley Fault.
This item is closed now.
Item 4.
Gable l'iountain Magnitude.
This item is closed now.
Item 5.
Swarm Earthquake Response.
The applicant stated a new position in the May 18, 1982, meeting which is different than presented earlier. The staff needs documentation for their new position including the ground motion effects of their position.
Item 6.
USAS Fectonic itodel Questions.
l No applicant committed to provide the responses by June 11, 1982.
l Item 7.
The applicant committed to provide a short summary of deterministic upper bound of the slip rate for RAW.
fh R. Auluck, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing
Attachment:
As stated cc: w/ enclosure:
See next page i
l 3.
omes >..0A:18:13/11k.0L:2GB.C.
lsucnme>.. ' '...It.f c..k..:...p t..A..S..c.hwe n c e..r..
.. 6/,2,18,2,,,,,,,,,g/f,}L8,2,,,,,,,,
om>
pc rosu sia tio-aoi nacu c24o i
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usom im-us..co
Mr. R. L. Ferguson Managing Director Washington Public Power Supply Syste.o P. O. Box 968 3000 George Wasington Way Richland, Washington 99352 cc: Nicholas Reynolds, Esquire Debevoise & Liberman 1200 Seventeenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20036 Mr. G. E. Doupe, Esq.
Washington Public Power Supply System P.O. Box 968 3000 George Washington Way Richland, Washington 99352 Nicholas Lewis, Chairman Energy Facility Si.te Evaluation Council 820 East 'Fifth Avenue Olympia, Washington 98504 Roger Nelson, Licensing Manager Washington Public Power Supply System
~
P.O. Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352 Mr. W.G. Conn, Sr. N/M Group Supervisor I
Burns and Roe, Incorporated 601 Williams Boulevard Richland, Washington 99352 Mr. Richard Feil U.S.N.R.C. Resident Inspector WPPSS-2 NPS l
P.O. Box 69 Richland, Washington 99352 Dr. G.D. Bouchey.
Deputy Director, Safety & Security Washington Public Power Supply System P.0'. Box 968, MD 650 Richland, Washington 99352 f
L J
8 e
-. - - __- -_= _-..
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYTEM - NRC GE0 LOGY - SEISMOLOGY MEETING May 18,1982 - Bethesda R. M. Nelson WPPSS R. Auluck NRR/DL Ina B. Alterman NRC/GSB Stephan Brocoum NRC/GSB David P. Schwart:
WCC A. K. Ibrahim NRC/GSB Burt Slemmons NRC/Consulant Kevin Coppersmith WCC S. T. Algermissen U.S. G.S.
Burt Swan WCC Tim Haft USGS Jeff Kfmball NRC/GB Greg Davis WPPSE consultant David Tillson WPPS! consultant Bill Kiel Supp'.y System Sam Harding USGS Robert E. Jackson NRC R.B. McMullen NRC/GSB Len Reiter MRC/GSB Mike Mallory NRC/LB#4 Harold Lefevre NRC/GSB Don Caldwell Golder Collen Ostrowski NRC/RES Thomas Allison NRC/GSB Carl Stepp Woodward /Clyde 4
Virgilio Rubio.
Nuclear Safety Commission of Mexico Tom Schmitt NRC/RES David Perkins U.S. Geological Survey-Golden Co.
Bill Waddel WPPSS Edward M. Levine Weston Geophysical Ron Chitwood WPPSS Lloyd S. Cluff Woodward /Clyde - consultant Robert R. Youngs Woodward /Clyde - consultant Donal 0. West Woodward /Clyde - consultant j
Calvin W. Moon NRC/ Licensing Bedros Bedrostan Burns & Roe, Inc.
David G. Powell Lowenstein, Newman, et.al i
J f
r-,
-_.-,_,r, 7
SUPPLY SYSTEM /NRC MEETING 18 MAY 1982 i
l AGENDA 1.
SOUTHEAST ANTICLINE FAULT 2.
COCHRAN'S GEOPHYSICAL DATA 3.
M0XEE-WENAS VALLEY FAULTS 4.
GABLE MOUNTAIN MAGNITUDE 5.
SWARM EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE 6.
USGS TECTONIC MODEL QUESTIONS
~
DRAFT EVALUATION OF THE SOUTHEAST ANTICLINE FAULT:
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS THE SOUTHEAST ANTICLINE FAULT WAS CORED IN 5 CLOSELY SPACED O
HOLES.
~.
O DATA FROM THESE HOLES INDICATE THAT THE FAULT HAS A REVERSE SENSE OF MOVEMENT, STRIKES N39'W AND DIPS 30' SW.
O ASSUMING THE RANGE OF DIP ON THE RATTLESNAKE RIDGE INTERBED IS O' to 11',
THE RANGE OF VERTICAL DISPLACEMENT ON THE
- FAULT IS 35 TO 60 FEET AND THE RANGE OF DIP-SLIP DISPLACEMENT IS 70 TO 110 FEET.
O SUPRABASALT SEDIMENTS ACROSS THE PROJECTED TRACE OF THE FAULT HAVE BEEN PENETRATED BY 11 HOLES SPACED 30 TO 100 FEET APART ALONG A LINE 450 FEET LONG.
O THE SUPRABASALT SEDIMENTS INCLUDE THE LOWER RINGOLD FORMATION (APPROXIMATELY 10 MILLION YEARS OLD) AND THE PLEISTOCENE HANFORD FORMATION.
O FINE-GRAINED UNITS WITHIN THE PRE-MISSOULA GRAVELS OF THE HANFORD FORMATION HAVE BEEN DATED ON THE BASIS OF PALEOMAGNETIC ANALYSES AS OLDER THAN 730,000 YEARS.
O FOUR STRATIGRAPHIC CONTACTS, RANGING IN AGE FROM APPROXI-MATELY 10 MILLION TO AT LEAST 730,000 YEARS IN AGE, HAVE BEEN TRACED ACROSS THE PROJECTION OF THE FAULT AND SHOW NO ABRUPT CHANGES IN ELEVATION.
4 BASED ON THESE OBSERVATIONS, THE SOUTHEAST ANTICLINE FAULT HAS NOT BEEN ACTIVE FOR APPROXIMATELY 10 MILLION YEARS.
I O
f MEETING
SUMMARY
DISTRIBUTION:
DATE:
Document Control (50-
)
NRC PDR Local PDR PRC NSIC LBt2 Reading File NRC PARTICIPANTS:
EHylton Roger Nelson Project Manager R. Aulutk R. Auluck E. Case
- 1. Al terman D. Eisenhut/R. Purple S. Brocum R. Tedesco A. Ibranim J. Youngblood G. Davis R. Jackson A. Schwencer R. McMullen F. Miraglia L. Reiter E. Adensam M. Mallorv SSPS 11. Lefevre G. Lainas C. Ostrowski W. Russell T. Allisen i
D. Crutchfield I. Schmitt T. Ippolito C. Moon J. P. Knight N'
C' S"" ""*C Y#9" D
l T. Speis R. Houston f
L. Rubenstein F. Schroeder l
M. Ernst J. Kramer Attorney, OELD Paton 015E Region y
Resident Inspector 4
ACRS (16)
OSD (7) l m
0 0
>R MGtig
~
o UNITED STATES
[E'f, g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g,*g"(., p '
. C WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
%,.N
/
June 8,1982
...+
50-397 WPPSS i
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Document Management Branch, TIDC FROM:.
Director, Divison of Rules and Records, ADM
SUBJECT:
REVIEW OF UTILITY EMERGENCY PLAN DOCUMENTATION I
The submitter of the attached document has expressed no desire to withhold any information contained therein.
Therefore, this material may now be made publicly available.
fyf J. M. Felton, Director Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration
/
Attachment:
As stated V.
~j
- u <... vsQ
= t; savn.,IS82 w -9 c
e-a 1
$f[3
~
s
/g
\\@
-4GQ6L&O3G& 820608 PDR ADOCK 05000397 F
PDR l
SEGul
- P i INFORvATICW OI57RIduTI
' SY STEM (CIDS) i
[CCESSIGN NaRt=c c ".~
7, OUC.0 ATE: 62/05/21 NCTARIZED: NC DOCKET #
o FACIL 50-347 ^PDSS Nuclear Preiect, Unit 2, Aasminsten Public P' e
05000397 e
AUTM..NAdE AUTHUR AFS ILIATION UCUCHEY,G.v.
easnincton Puelic Power Supply Syster RECIP.Novt mECIPItNI *FFILIATIOu Sch>ENCEH,A.
Licensinc dranch a SLdJECT: Central Files version of notice of rescneculeo smeroency exercise for d3cnoi,in succort of Sect 1923 cro. lect fuel 1049 cate.Imclementing procecures will ce schmittec M9 1855 tnan ISO anys before loac date.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: XOOSS COPIES AECEIVED:LTH __I ENCL (2 SIZE:__________
i T I r t. E : Erere Clan (CF avdit)
NCTES:
HECIPIEfT GOPIES RECIPIENT CCPIES IU CCOE/ f' AVE LTTR ENCL 10 CODE /NAME LTTR EklCL LIC bR 82 dC 1
AULUChe W.
01 1
l t
i INTENAACT -0 U333[3 Od 1
FEVA-REP CTV 09 1
L If~ FILE Od 1
IE/UEP JId 1
)
IE/CEP EPCd 1
IE/DEP/EPLP 03 3
)
h
- l. Pet /USI/.6Em i
M43/ DST /Ca9 1
)
web FILES 0/
1 L
I
()
TOTAL NUMdER OF COPIES REwu1 RED: LTTC 13 ENCL
Washington Public Power Supply System P.O_. Box 960 3000 GeorgeWadington Way Richland. Washington 99352 (509)372-5000 May 21, 1982 G02-82-463 Docket NO. 50-397 Mr. A. Schwancer, Chief Licensin2 Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing U. S. hucle3r Regulatory Cosnission Washington, D. C.
20Ej5
Dear Mr. Schwencer:
Subject:
EMERGEi'lCY EXERCISE - WNP-2 the major Emergency Exercise for WNP-2 had been planned to occur in Sectember 1932 in Stpport of a project target fuel load date cf December 1982.
A reassessment of oroject status has caused us to reschedule the major Emergency Exercise for June 1, 1983, in support of a September 1983 project fuel load date.
r To ecnt1nue with ?.ne September 19R2 Exercise would have required a number of temporary provisions involving the Technical Support Center, Emergency Ocerations f'aciIity, comnication Center, dedicated telephone network, [mergency Plen implementi.ng procadures and the technical data systemt. By reichedu ing the Exercise to June 1,1983, permanent plant faci 11 tics and equipment will be available.
i We will begir, teveloping drills tnis sunner, and drills will 6e conducted I
between February and May W83 in sreparation for the major Exercise.
Participating arganizations will ae involved in drill development.
Developter.t of the major Exerci:e wi"<1 begin in January 1983.
This change ir, the Exercise date wili also result in a revised schedule for completion of the implemer, ting reocecuras.
In accordance wi.th 10CFR50, Appendix E, the implementing procedures will be submitted no less tnin 180 days prior to the scheduled fuel load date.
Very truly yours, S
w 5s
- l G. D. Bouchey puty Director Safety & Security l
cc:
R Fish
- NRC R0. V R Auluck - NRC W Chin BPA R Feil NRC 90 g;;leM4GG9P 820608
$10 PDR ADOCK 05000397 l
F PDR l
_