ML20213C776
| ML20213C776 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 05/08/1987 |
| From: | Randy Erickson Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Stolz J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8705140113 | |
| Download: ML20213C776 (5) | |
Text
- - - - - - - - _ - -. - - _
-A sg. 7 MAY.- Og 1987 3
-Q-Docket No. 50-412 4
. MEMORANDUM FOR: John F. Stolz, Director Project Directorate I-IV Division of Reactor Projects I/II FROM:
Robert A. Erickson, Chief Reactor Safeguards Branch Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards
SUBJECT:
REVISED LICENSE CONDITION AND SAFEGUARDS SER INPUT FOR BEAVER-VALLEY POWER STATION, UNIT 2
. Enclosed for your use, as appropriate, is a revised license condition (Enclosure 1), and a listing of the revisions to the approved physical security, safeguards contingency, and guard training and qualification plans (Enclosure 2) and a current SALP evaluation input (Enclosure 3).
The approved Physical Security Plan includes the Miscellaneous Amendment and Search Requirements Revision submitted on December 1, 1986.
We request that Enclosure 2 be transmitted to the licensee as a chronology of the approved plans' evolution; it should be maintained with the safeguards plans, separate from the license.
This documentation, in addition to establishing a record of current safeguards amendments, provides assistance in the inspection effort, since licensees can_only be cited against the approved safeguards plan for violations, not against the regulations.
s i
3 i
8705140113 870508 PDR ADOCK 05000412 4f PDR r
t-
>;n 8
li.;
eg. - -. =
SAMPLE" REVISED LC:
e ~0g B8T
~
' John F. Stolz ',
The latest changes to the security plans do not require'any revisions to the already approved. Safeguards ~SER.
'v;;
Robert A. Erickson, Chief Reactor Safeguards Branch _
Division'of Reactor Inspection L
and Safeguards
Enclosures:
'1.
Revised-License Condition
~2.
List of Approved Revisions 3.
.SALP Evaluation Input
. 4 cc w/enclos:
P. Tam S. Norris x
DISTRIBUTION:
s CBuracker(2)
RManili LBush RErickson NRCPDR R/F
.LPDR i
I L
4
/
1 S03; previous concurrence page.
OFC:RSGB
- RSGB
- RSGB
- RSGB
- NAME:CBURACKER
.:RMANILI
- LBUSH
- REFgFSON lDATE:5/8/87
.:5/8/87
- 5/8/87
- 5/8/87 o.
a
m-
- ga W
't
.s-50-412 PROPOSED LICENSE CONDITION 3
The licensee shall fully implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the ph/sical security, guard training and qualification, and safeguards contingency plans previously approved by the Commission and all amendments and revisions to such plant made pursuant to the authority of 10 CFR 50.90 and 10 CFR 10.54(p). The plans, which contain Safeguards Information protected under 10 CFR 73.21, are entitled: " Beaver Valley Power Station Security Plan," with revisions submitted through April 15, 1987;
" Beaver Valley Power Station Security Training and Qualification Plan,"
with revisions submitted through June 27, 1983; and " Beaver Valley Power Station Security Contingency Plan," with revisions submitted through November 30, 1983.
ENCLOSURE 1
- c:
~
- Q t
, 412.
Beaver Valley Power Station Unit 2 The approved security plans for the Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit 2, consist'of the following amendments, revisions, and changes:
" Beaver Valley Power Station Physical Security Plan"
- Issue 4, Revision 0, February 1987'(letter dated February 19,1987).
- Issue 4, Revision 0, April 1987 (letter dated April 15,1987).
" Beaver Valley Safeguards Contingency Plan"
- Issue 3, Revision 0, June 1983 (letter' dated June 27,1983).
Issue 3, Revision 1,' November 1983 (letter dated November 30,1983).
" Beaver Valley Training and Qualification Plan" Issue 3, Revision 0, June 1983 (letter dated June 27,1983).
1 l
L l-4 ENCLOSURE 2
9 A
y a
s RSGB:RBM 50-412 SALP REPORT Beaver valley Unit 2 CRITERIA CATEGORY 1.
Management Involvement and Control in Assuring Quality There was consistent evidence of prior planning by utility 1
(including corporate level) management.
Responses regarding safeguards matters were technically sound and consistent, demonstrating the existence of well developed policies and procedures for control of security related activities.
2.
Approach to Resolution of Technical Issues from a Safety / Safeguards
\\
Standpoint 3
' Solutions tc' technical safeguards problems were sound, timely 1
and conservative, indicating a clear understanding of the issues.
3.
Responsiveness to NRC Initiatives Resolutions were submitted promptly, and in most cases I
were acceptable the first time.
4.
Enforcement History N/A 5.
_ Reporting and Analysis of Reportable Events N/A 6.
Staffing (Including Management)
Security Organization positions and responsibilities are 1
i well defined.
The security staff is considered to be more j
than ample to implement the facility physical protection program.
7.
Training and Qualification Effectiveness The facility guard training and qualification plan is 1
effectively implemented on a continuing basis at all levels of the security organization.
ENCLUSURE 3
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _