ML20213A028

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notifies That Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Filed Brief in Opposition to Applicants Petition Under 10CFR2.758 & 10CFR50.47(c) for Reduction in Size of Facility Plume Exposure Pathway Epz,Per ASLB 870107 Order
ML20213A028
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  
Issue date: 01/27/1987
From: Backus R
BACKUS, MEYER & SOLOMON, SEACOAST ANTI-POLLUTION LEAGUE
To: Harbour J, Hoyt H, Luebke E
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#187-2350 OL, NUDOCS 8702030064
Download: ML20213A028 (2)


Text

..

m L

2354 BAC K Us, M EY ER & S O LO M o r90te f iG d

ArronNEys AT LAW mos cnt A. BACst y g AREA COCC 603 SON ucven-R o 0o= sie

'87 JAN 29 P2 :49 e...u n j

STEVCN A. SOLOMON MANCH ESTER, N. H. ossos

  • ALSO ACMITTCO M ARilN R. JCN KIN g TO MASSACHL/5ETTS BAR

"'C"*"5^*'*

00CKETiN. i. t J,1 9.l. BRANCH b w" January 27, 1987 l

J udge liclen lloyt, Chairperson Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission East West Towers Building 4350 East West liighway Be t h es da, MD 2 0 814 i-Dr. Emmeth A.

Luebke l

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board i

U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission East West Towers Building 4

4350 East West Highway Bethesda, MD 20814 i

Dr. J er ry liarbour Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission East West Towers Building 4350 East West Highway Bethesda, MD 20814

)

Re:

Public Service Company of New Hampshire, et al Docket No. 5 0-44 3-OL/.5o - # Vf-o L l

Dear Administrative Judges:

SAPL has this date filed " Seacoast Anti-Pollution League's Brief in 1

Opposition to Applicants' Petition Under 10 CFR !2.758 and 10 CFR l

650.47(c) For Reduction in the Size of the Seabrook Station Plume j

Exposure Pa thway EPZ" pursuant to the Board's Order of January 7,

1987, i

i it is SAPL's position, for the reasons set forth in our Brief, that i

the Applicants have not made "a pr ima f acie showing" ent itling their Petition to any further consideration by this Board, or by the Commission.

SAPL balleves a prima facie case must include the l

establishment of sufficient facts so that, if not rebutted, the Applicants could be found entitled to the relief which they seek.

As set for th in our Brief, the Applicants have not met this s tandard.

8702030064 870127

) bO hDR ADOCK 05000443 i

PDR

. ~ _

... _ _.. _. _. ~. _ _, _ -.

1 Page two:

Lastly, SAPL wishes to advise the Board that it was not able to complete its submission by this date, and would advise the Board that the " reasonable date certain" by which SAPL expects to be able to complete its response is February 26, 1987.

Perhaps SAPL will be able to_ expedite its response before that date, but this will depend in part upon what further activities become necessary in regard to ongoing Seabrook licensing proceedings.

Very truly yours, n/s

/

fl, f h A 4

,/

bert A.

Backus RAB/ lab cc:

Attached service list d