ML20212K737
| ML20212K737 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/18/1986 |
| From: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Keel B INTERIOR, DEPT. OF, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20212K739 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8608220442 | |
| Download: ML20212K737 (13) | |
Text
.- -
AUG 181986 Dr. Bennie C. Keel Departmental Consulting Archeologist Department of the Interior National Park Service P.O. Box 37127 Washington, D.C.
20013-7127
Dear Dr. Keel:
This is in response to your June 13, 1986 request to Nunzio J. Palladino, Chairman, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for information needed to prepare the Annual Report to Congress on the Federal Archeology Program. The questionnaire you provided has been completed with the appropriate information on NRC's activities and is enclosed for your use.
The NRC's involvement in historic preservation stems from its licensing responsibilities for production and utilization facilities.
Compliance with historic preservation laws is accomplished by the NRC during its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews for construction permits and operating licenses of production and utilization facilities.
The NRC does not acquire, maintain or restore any archeological or historic properties identified during the environmental review process. When it is determined that mitigative measures are required, these are undertaken by the applicant / licensee. Arrangements are normally formalized as a condition of the construction permit and as a Memorandum of Agreement with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHP0). As a permitting agency, the NRC does not incur any direct costs associated with protection or enhancement of archeological and historic resources.
pdgiosisigned by Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Questionnaire DISTRIBUTION Central Files LSolander
%%be g
PRAB R/F BHayden Nb % >
- n [, k EDO DCleary c/
HDenton PDR
{f
- f. 9 RVo11mer EDO 001846 4
g gl JFunches SECY L
OFC PRAB:P AS PRAB:PPAS, PAS DD RR DI R
RARE]BHay an L
er JFunches Rfollmer HBenton>
1/;j/86
- 5/ /86 5/g/86
- /g/86 5/ y/86 7
gj ggp2 ggpo 0FFICAL RECORD COPY PDR
., /
s 4
Questionnaire for the Annual Report to Congress on the Federal Archeology Program NUMBER YES NO OTHER A. Permitting NOT APPLICABLE 1.
Number of ARPA permit applications.
2.
Number of ARPA permits issued.
3.
Number of these which were for basic research.
(Research conducted primarily for scientific or scholarly purposes) 4.
Number of permits for applied research.
- a. Research conducted for statutory complianc,e or management purposes by agency personnel
- b. Research conducted for statutory compliance or management purposes under contract
- c. Research conducted for statutory compliance or management purposes by a third party) 5.
Number of permits denied.
~
6.
Number of permits revoked.
7.
Number of appeals.
a) Within agency b) Other (e.g., Interior Board of f.and Appeals)
PAGE1 l
NUMtfER YES NO OTHER (A. Permitting continued) 8.
Number of permits suspended.
~
9.
Number of permits reinstated.
- 10. What kind of hardware and sof tware are you using?
II. If not, do you intend to automate it?
- 12. If so, when?
- 13. Do you have a system for " pre-certifying" permit applicants?
- 14. Number of permits for archeological activities issued under other authorities (non-collection surveys, etc.)
Specify authorities.
- 15. Number of contracts considered to be a permit '
for purposes of ARPA?
- 16. Number of contracts considered to be a permit under other authorities?
Specify authorities
- 17. Number of times an Indian tribe was notified of an impending permit?
- 13. Number of times an Indian tribe was notified of an impending contract which constituted a permit.
PAGE 2 O
e
e ap _
e.
,,./
NUnastFR YES NO OTIER B. Esdorcemeset NOT APPLICABLE r
I.
Percent of cultural resource personnel that have received ARPA training?
FLETC t
Other (specify) 2.
What percent of your law enforcement persont I have received
~
ARPA training?
a.FLETC
- b. Other (specify) 3.
What training courses do you use?
4.
Documented violations of ARPA.
Number of cases of documented vandalism Number of arrests?
Number of citations?
5.
Number of civil penalties applied?
6 How much was collected in fines?
7.
How much was given in rewards?
8.
What was the monetary value of archaeological resources seized and retained by the government?
9.
What was the monetary value of other personal property seized and retained by the government?
i PAGF1
NUMBER
_YES NO OT ER 1
B. (Enforcement continued) s
- 10. How many criminal convictions?
misdemeanors
~
~
l felonies second offenses 1
- 11. Amount of restitution costs?
a l
- 12. How many cases of vandalism, destruction, thef t, etc.,
of cultural resources were prosecuted under other authorities?
- 13. Which authorities?
- 14. Estimate of the number and types of cultural resources I
owned and controlled by your agency?
- 15. Is this inventory automated?
l
- 16. What is the hardware and sof tware you use?
- 17. Do you have an estimate of the extent of vandalism, thef t, etc.,
i
)
of these resources?
- 18. If so, what is the extent?
- 19. Estimate the savings to law enforcement, maintenance, etc. that l
resulted from your enforcement efforts?
i i
i PAGE 4 i
1 l
J i
Nl /
JMBER
_YES NO OTHER B. (Enforcement continued)
- 20. Have you used any remote sensing equipment in site protection (magnetic sensors, etc.)?
If yes, identify.
- 21. Were they useful?
- 22. Were there any probler's with the equipment?
- 23. Have you developed any innovative methods of dealing with resource protection that you would like discussed in the report to Congress?
For example; patrol, fencing, gates, stabilization, vegetation, etc.
If so, please provide a short description.
PAGE5 e
O
NUA888R
_YES NO OTH$R C. INblic and h-4touse Education 1
1.
Have you undertaken any public education activities regarding preservation of archeological resources?
XX i
2.
Are these initiatives local, regional, or national?
N/A 3.
Will you send us copies of any such material for the archeology j
public relations clearinghouse? (Available as a lending library to any N/A j
Federal agency). Please describe a few examples of your choice.
l If you have a separate agency report on your public outreach efforts, please provide a copy.
j 4.
Does your agency require public outreach activities for j
archeological work, including that conducted under Federal contract?
XX
'l 3.
Have you undertaken any in-house education activities regarding preservation of archeological resources?
XX l
1 4
i l
4 1
PAGE 6 1
1 1
i i
NCEBER YES NO CTHER C. (Public and In-house Education continued) 6.
Does your agency have in-house para-professional courses in XX archeology?
7.
Does your agency have cultural resource sensitivity classes or seminars for personnel employed in other than the cultural resource XX field?
8.
How many archeological reports were produced as a result of projects conducted on your agency's lands, or as a result of 21 agency licensed or assisted projects?
Not made public 9.
How are these reports made available to the public? NTIS, DTIS,
^
other?
XX
- 10. Are copies of these reports filed with the SHPO's?
G 9
4 PAGE7 9
J
M4JillBER YES NO OTHER D. Survey and Evaksation 1.
Approximately how many literature searches of. archeological Not available or other historic properties did you conduct?
from licensee Not available 1
2.
Approximate total cost of such activities?
from licensee I
3.
Approximately how many field surveys of archeological 6
properties did you conduct?
4.
Approximate total cost of these survey project's?
N/A from~ licensee l 5.
Approximate number of new sites recorded as a result of 118 these surveys?
6.
Approximate total acreage surveyed by these projects?
N/A from licensee 7.
How many of these sites were considered eligible for the National 45 Register?
8.
How many of these sites were formally determined eligible for the 0
National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)?
9.
How many of these sites were nominated to the Nitional Register of 0
Historic Places ?
~
PAGE8 l
e e
,.. /
NUMBER YES NO OTHER E. Data B=-
y s
l 1.
Subsequent to 106 Compliance, how many sites were adversely 0
effected by development activities?
2.
How many of these sites were subjected to additional research (data recovery), or other recording?
7 3.
How many individual data recovery projects does this represent?
- a. Number conducted by agency personnel?
0
- b. Number conducted by contract or other agreement?
O
- c. Number conducted by third parties?
7 4.
Approximate total cost of these data recovery projects?
0
- a. Agency costs?
- b. Contract --or other agreement-costs?
0
- c. Third party costs (if available)?
N/A from licensee 3.
How many of these sites were protected in seine other manner (project redesign, stabilization, patrols, fences, gates, etc.)?
45 6.
Please list of all projects conducted, and individual project costs.
- Humboldt Bay
- Humboldt Bay Unit 3 Decosmissioning Actions Diablo Canyon 1/2
- Photo Monitor SLD 2 Site - 12 times
- 12 kw Line Pole Removal
- Pemanent SLD-2 Boundary Markers
- Ground Water Monitoring Wells Vogtle 1/2
- Data Reesvery Studies for Vogtle-Scherer
- Resource Inventory and Assessment Studi=5 - Goshen Transmission Line
- Resource Evaluation Studies for Vogtle/Scherer PAGE 9
- Resource Inventory and Assessment of Vogtle/Scherer Transmission Line
- Resource Evaluation Studies for Vogtle (Effingham-Thalman)
- Data Recovery Studies for Vogtle (Effingham-Thalman) l
- Resource Evaluation Studies for Vogtle-Goshen
- Cost not available froc Licensee
1
,,./
NUa4BER YES NO OTEW.R F. Discoveries
~
i 1.
Subsequent to 106 compliance, how many of your agency's projects, or its assisted, licensed or permitted projects, resulted in the 0
1 discovery of unexpected resources 2.
How many of these resources were considered,to be important because 0
of their data content?
1 i
3.
How many of these discoveries were subjected to data recovery und' r e
l the 1% clause of P.L.93-291?
0
{
4.
What was the cost of this data recovery?
- a.. Agency costs?
O j
- b. Contract --or other agreement-costs?
0 j
- c. Third party costs (if available)?
N/A from licensee i
3.
How reany of these discoveries were subjected,to data recovery under 0
}
other authorities?
i l
6.
What was the costs of this data recovery?
~
0 i
- a. Agency costs?
- b. Contract --or other agreement-costs?.
O i
- c. Third party costs (if available)?
N/A from licensee 7.
Did your agency compensate any person, asso'ciation, or public entity damaged as a result of any delays in construction or loss of the use of land necessitated by this data recovery?
yy f
g gg g g.,
Not applicable j..
[
1 PAGE 10 l'
1
7
- ~-
o, a
n aso
- ps uq%
UNITE 3 STATES
~,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
/;I hQ&L W
wAsHWGTON, D. C. 20555 f
EDO PRINCIPAL CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL FROM:
DUE: 08/15/86 EDO CONTROL: 001846 DOC DT: 06/13/86 BENNIE C. KEEL FINAL REPLY:
U.S. DEPT. OF THE INTERIOR TO:
CHAIRMAN PALLADINO FOR SIGNATURE OF OREEN SECY NO: 86-602 DENTON DESC:
ROUTINO:
REQUEST COMPLETION OF QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS ON THE FEDERAL ARCHEOLOGY PROGRAM r
[DATE: 06/17/86
~
ASSIGNED TO: NRR CONTACT: DENTON SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS
,9 em
/
ACTION:
~ 06/18 86
/
NRR RECEIVED:
jM v
NRR ROUTING:
DENTON
~
PPAS MOSSBURG/ TOMS l
l 1
1
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET PAPER NUMBER:
CRC-86-0602 LOGGING DATE: Jun 16 86 ACTION OFFICE:
EDO AUTHOR:
B.C. Keel AFFILIATION:
DOI (DEPT OF INTERIOR)
LETTER DATE:
Jun 13 86 FILE CODE:
SUBJECT:
Questionnaire for the Annual Rpt to Congress on the Federal Archeology Program ACTION:
Appropriate DISTRIBUTION:
SPECIAL HANDLING: None NOTES:
Please note completion date of 8-22-86 DATE DUE:
SICNATURE:
DATE SIGNED:
AFFILIATION:
Rec'd 011. E00 Date _4 -f},. g g Time-
/ %' p W
')01 tf H2 L i> U
---