ML20212J192
| ML20212J192 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 02/09/1987 |
| From: | Fitzgerald J NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI) |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20209B583 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-86-151 NUDOCS 8703060344 | |
| Download: ML20212J192 (2) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:.
* , p CA 'ug g# * ' l9 ? '4, UNITED STATES E\[. ' ,;
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
; .;- a WASHINGTON, D. C. 20s55
- e. ~
g ,_D+ g V1 y
- MEMORANDUM FOR: Darrell G. Eisenhut Director Division of Licensing FROM: James Fitzgerald, Acting Director Office of Investigations
SUBJECT:
BOARD NOTIFICATION FOR DIABLO CANYON Attached are our comments pertaining to your letter of June 16, 1982.
/
6.. ; ; ). ' ( _ James Fitzgerald, Acting Director
' Office of Investigations
Attachment:
As stated 4 m M
/ 0
' 8703060344 870209 PDR FOIA PDR HOLMES 86-151
SUBJECT:
ALLEGATIONS CONCERNING THE DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (Board Notification No. 82). In accordance with present NRC procedures for Board Notifications the enclosed anonymous letter from a concerned engineer is provided to the Commission for
. information'(Enclosure 1). The allegations expressed in the letter raise serious questions as to the design adequacy of Diablo Canyon, Unit 1. The allegations are related to the ongoing Independent Design Verification Program which is the subject, in part, of Commission Order CLI 81-30. The Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation requested the' Office of Investigations and the Office of Inspection and Enforcement to review the letter for any action which they deemed appropriate. We have been advised by IE and OI that no investigation is warranted because they are satisfied that the concern identified in the letter will be covered by s Phase II of the Independent Design Verification Program. (see Enclosure 2). ' The material does not' pertain to those matters that were resolved by ALAB 644.
~
,I,
'7
@e.-
l
.o.
> j. .
.a nse, o,, UNITED STATES
- ! n NUCi. EAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g a WASHINGTON. D. C. 20656 S
g.....,/ June 16,1982 MEMORANDUM FOR: James Fitzgerald, Acting Director Office of Investigations FROM: Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division oT Licensing
SUBJECT:
BOARD NOTIFICATION FOR DIABLO CANYON 1 have determined that the information contained in the attached allegation is appropriate for Board Notification. This notification is submitted for your review and consnents. This allegation was transmitted to your Office for appropriate action. (Memo Denton to Fitzgerald, June 4,1982). Please provide your comments to Mark Williams by COB June 21, 1982. M -j Q Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing
/
Enclos ure: - As Stated . cc: J.Sinclair -!
/
<v *
. i
\ \
g# q 3 q.
' a nte
; (/ . . UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION e *-
-{ ,) wasmworow, p. c.noess
- \,,,,,,/ Dockel. No.: 50-275 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chairman Palladino Connissioner Gilinsky Commissioner Ahearne Comissioner Roberts Comissioner Asselstine FROM: Darrell G. Eisenhut Director
- Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
ALLEGATIONS CONCERNING THE DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (Board Notification No. 82- ) In accordance with present NRC procedures for Board Notifications the enclosed anonymous letter from a concerned engineer is provided to the Comission for information (Enclosure 1). The allegations expressed in the letter raise serious questions as to the design adequacy of Diablo Canyon, Unit 1. The allegations are related to the ongoing Independent Design 4 Verification Program which is tne subject, in part, of Comission Order CLI-81-30. The Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation has requested the Office of Investigations to initiate appropriate actions and will include the concerns within the scope of Phase II of the Independent Design Verification Program (see Enclosure 2). The material does not pertain to those matters that were resolved by ALAB 644. Darrell G. Eisenhut,' Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
- l
. . _ ~ - - _ - . . - _ . _ . _ . _ . . . ~ . . . . _ ~ _ . . . . _ - _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ . _ - _ _ . _ _ - _ . - _._._.-- _ _.-
.f
. united STATES
*f' g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.g. -l wasmacrow. o. c. mosss
\,...../ m u mz
~
Dock'et No.: 50-275 MEMORANDUM FOR: Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing FROM: Robert L. Tedesco, Assistant Director for Licensing Division of .Licensing _
SUBJECT:
PROPOSEDSd/,P.DNOTIFICATIONREGARDING' ALLEGATIONS CONCERNING THE DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
,(BoardNotificationNo.82-p
! I recomend that the enclosed Board Notification be transmitted to The Comission. It consists of allegations by a concerned engineer. By memo of June 4,1982 ONRR requested OI to initiate appropriate action and stated that the allegations will be included in the scope of Phase II of the IDVP. h' & 'i w Robert L. Tedesco, Assistant Director for Licensing Division of Licensing
/ , ,*
u)
., t
, cra 1/ , (t v f,-hw *
..,,.w, h ~ , f *' ,., = ; '
(
- q10 g.0 f s '
}. .
,-N ' 'f-U
- . _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . , . . _ . . - . _ _ _ _ , _ . . , _ , _ _ . _ . _ , , ...____.______.__...-__.-._.__.._..m..-._____... ._..__.
*8
'o o
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION {- ,I wasmNcTow. o. c. zosss
\*****/
MAY 2 81982 MEMORANDUM FOR: H. R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: D. G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
ALLEGATIONS'CONCERNINGTHEDIABLOCANYdNNUCLEARPOWER PLANT l I The attached anonymous undated letter from a concerned engineer was received by the Office of Inspection and Enforcement on May 18, 1982. The alleged concerns raise serious questions as to the integrity of the ongoing Indepen-dent Design Verification Program. In view of the seriousness of these allegations, it is recommended that the attached memorandum be forwarded to the Office of Inspection and Enforcement for further review and other appropriate actions. k*M3 h . I Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing l l
'N y&
gg66jo5?y ft
-,.~---w-.--.w , ,c ,,, .-,.-,.,-.g,, ,_ - wmv%-e.-----e-%--,-ygwe- yw- -m- -rw-r-e.-----,v'
T
;[y ,, I'),
UNIT ED STATES a
. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7- -
wasmucTcu.o. c.rosss l ~
/
AIAY 18'19),,
/h NOTE TO: Ed Case,' NRR FROM:
- bh -
Jim Sniezek, IE ~ y ~ -
SUBJECT:
/ *,
A CONCERNED ENGINEERDIABLO CANYON g h ,s .e - s UNDATED LETT s !
- (.
On May 18, I received the enclosed le.tter from "a concerned engineer" stating several concerns regarding the seismic reanalysis ucted being at Diabio Canyon. It appears appropriate that the concerns raised in the letter be factored into NRC review ofr.the reverificatio s J m Sniezek, IE
Enclosure:
j Undated Letter Received On May 18,1982 cc: R. H. Engelken, RV E. L. Jordan, IE l 4 e 9 . e l 6 l
\
cf&f0 l .
(= .
<r.' .
l . _
, , p m ,.m ~la j
;: C/18l82- ,
y 90 NRC
Washington, D. C. .
Dear Mr. Richard DiYoung:
I am currently involved in the Diablo . Canyon Review effort now in progress., I nust say that this is the . worst nuclear power plant that I' have ever worked on.
~
and it is not SAFE, I was hoping with the introduction of Bechtel that a complete re-analysis of Unit 1 would be done. Alas thi's is not to be. The pGLE management / engineers only correct the mistakes that are found accidentially or are forced down their throats. If the error is an generic one, they will not review everything . but just what caused the error and they will only correct that one mistake. The latent review is for hosgri only but the real danger.is that:
- 1) The thermal / deadweight analysis does not match the. seimic or current field support configuration.
Systems are failing when corrected.
. 2) The so-called 'As-Built" pipe support drawings
~
are not as-built ~but instead are the accumulation of all the changes to the support drawing over the past 13 years. The support have not been walked down in the field to show thereilatest configuration or orientation 'to the pipe. Also interferences with structure are not show on the drawin5s.
- I only ask that you have R. L. Cloud & Assceiates review the thermal / Deadweight analysis m's well as the
.Hos5ri they are now doing. This will confirm what I have said. If action is not taken, I may be force to seek a publi'c hearing on this. 'I am pro-nuclear but invalid analysis andincompetence must not be igored. This palnt in my opinion is bad from the analysis to the supports.
Thank you for your time. , Sincerely A Concered In51neer D
\
96 - gd ba c (/.
't .
'k' UNITED STATES 8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION *
; '.o g WASWNGTON, D. C. 20066
*t /
4 MEMORANDUM FOR: Richard C. DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement James Fitzgerald, Acting Director t Office of Investiagtions FROM: Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
ALLEGATIONS CONCERNING THE DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER ] PLANT The enclosed letter is forwarded for further review and possible action by your office. The allegations challenge the integrity of the ongoing i Independent Design Verification Program effort and would be serious if substantiated. ' l Ha d R. on, Director Office of uclear Reactor Regulation
\
s a
NRC
iashington,
. D. C.
Dear Mr. Richard DiYoung:
I am currently invol . effort now in progress.ved in the Diablo Canyon Review
. I must say that this is the worst nuclear and it is not SAFE.. power, plant that I have ever worked on.
of done. be Bechtel that a complete re-analysis of Unit I wouldI was hoping w Alas this is not to be. engineers only correct the mistakesThe thatPGLE are management found / accidentially or are forced down their throats. If the error is an generic one, they will not review everything but that just onewhat mistake. caused the error and they will only correct . but the real danger.is that:The latent review is for hosgri only
- 1) The thermal / deadweight analysis does not match Systems are failing when corrected.the seimic or current fi
- 2) The so-called 'As-Built" pipe support drawings are of allnotthe as-built changes 'but instead are the accu ulation past 13 years. to the support drawing over the The support have not been walked down in the field to show there'. latest configuration structure are not show on the' drawings.or orientation to t review I theonlythermal ask that you have R. L. ' Cloud & Assceintes
,Hosgri they are now/ Deadweight doing. analysis as well as the said.
public hearing If actionon is not this.taken, I may be -force to seek aThis will confirm wh andincombetence must not be igored. This paint in =y opinion'I a is bad from the analysis to the supports. , ,
' Thank you for your time.
Sincerely ' A Concered Engineer O s
F
~ ' '
~
.- - ** ,. Ai +,'
- , s.
MEMDRANDLM FOR: Richard C. DeYoun'g. Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement James Fitzgerald. Acting Director Office of Investi.agtions
~
FROM: Harold R. denton Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
ALLEGATIONS CONCERNING THE DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT The enclosed letter is forwarded for further review and possible action by your office. The allegations challenge the integrity of the ongoing Independent Design Verification Program effort and would be serious if substantiated. ' Harold R. Denton, Director _ Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Distribution: Docket File 50-272/323 TERA LB#3 File . HDenton/ECase . DEisenhut/RPurple RTedesco FMiraglia BBuckley JLee , K-f f $0 ' N (f-KA " i -
- r.cer DL 43 DLhd:L NRR:DIR
.m.:.,Biiuckley':W 'F ' ljlia"" ' RYM:dsch"" DL:df U53mhui" " 'N6fnIon ~ ""
', N) "7
" " " ~
"' /2 f,h,82
,,f,', ,f,',',7kE
~
't5 . . 's :'as. O O F F I C I A L .U C O F. D C O P Y . .,_ _ , . _ . . . _
' " ~ ' - -
. *. [., A"% UNITED STATES
# 'e NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{.= I wasmuoTom, p.c. zones
.}
Dock'et No.: 50-275 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chairman Palladino Commissioner Gilinsky Commiissioner Ahearne Consiissioner Roberts- - Consiissioner Asselstine' FROM: Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
ALLEGATIONS CONCERNING THE DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (Board Notification No. 82-62) l i In accordance with present NRC procedures for Board Notifications the
- enclosed anonymous letter from a concerned engineer is provided to the Comission for information (Enclosure 1). The allegations expressed in the
! letter raise serious questions as to the design adequacy of Diablo Canyon, Unit 1. The allegations are related to the ongoing Independent Design l Verification Program which is the subject, in part, of Commission Order CLI-l 81-30. The Office of Nuclear Reactor R ulation has requested the Office of M "fk, o 4e C4,M i stigationstoigig.b} g ppg,M< -g.: gg i g ' g concerns
,.- wf th'- th; .vy Phase II of the Independent Design Verification Program l (see Enclosure 2). The material does not pertain to those matters that were i resolved by ALAB 644.
l L- + j Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
As stated
- M G." L c.J+ af b, c rE... f o1'Th.l ,.m e n .. % .,
M v. M J 6 c ,. , , %.. ,...,,
.tc q d 'T he' % e<.- %
sf',0+< f v s Mtr , wJJ & cd l9 = . . pd[0$5% g. - - - - - - -
l
,( r p'# *%g. UNITED STATES j
it NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION p+
} WASHINGTON. D. C. 20655 q ej
%,, a.....f JUL 7 1982 Docket Nos. 50-275 50-323 }
Lb MEMORANDUM FOR: Robert L. Tedesco, Assistant irector for Licensing, Division of Licensing FROM: William V. Johnston, Assistant Director for Materials & Qualifications Engineering, Division of Engineering
SUBJECT:
COMENTS ON QA PROGRAM FOR DIABLO CANYON (PG&E - BECHTEL) We have reviewed PG&E's June 18, 1982 submittal of the Quality Assurance Program for the integrated project organization to bring Diablo Canyon Units No.1 and 2 to commercial operation. We find we need an acceptable response to the enclosed request for additional information in order ta complete our review. We find the program acceptable otherwise. W {A v. s.# V [. w. d e - William V. Johnston, Assistant Director for Materials & Qualifications Engineering Division of Engineering
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information cc: B. Buckley H. Schierling F. Miraglia
~
7 l ; ~. 1 l Lf fS 4 g9dM *fb
li
= f-REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION DIABLO CANYON PROJECT 260 QUALITY ASSURANCE BRANCH 260.1 The June 18, 1982 letter from PG&E states that PG&E and Bechtel have formed an integrated project organization.- However, the enclosure to the letter is titled " Quality Assurance Program - Bechtel Power Corporation - Diablo Canyon Project." Clarify.
260.2 To provide a better perspective of the integrated project organization, indicate by a B (for Bechtel Power Corporation) or a P (for PG&E) on figures 15-17 which organization is responsible to fill each block. 260.3 Discuss how PG&E (as the applicant) assures the quality of the work per-formed by the Project Team and/or by Bechtel (as a principal contractor). For example, do PG&E personnel, apart from the project team organization, function in accordance with the Quality Assurance Program described in section 17.2 of the Diablo Canyon FSAR? 260.4 Differentiate between the responsibilities of the Project Quality Assurance Engineer (with the"QRE's Field Home Office" block below), the Project Quality Engineer, and the APE Quality as shown on Figure 15.
; List the responsibilities and authority of each. For example, does each have "stop work" authority?
260.5 What individual (by position title) is responsible for the quality of
- the work performed by the Project Team and what individual (again by
- position title) is responsible for assuring the quality of the same work? Discuss how these responsibilities are met.
260.6 The fourth paragraph on page 1 of the Bechtel QA Program indicates that-( procurement may be by either PG&E or Bechtel. Verify that the company l which places the purchase c.rder will be responsible for supplier evalu-l' ation, supplier control, supalier audits, and source inspection, or indicate how these functions will be divided. If PG&E does the procure-ment, will the PG&E procurement controls be in accordance with section 17.2 of the Diablo Canyon FSAR or will they be in accordance with the enclosure to the June 18, 1982 letter? i 260.7 Discuss the involvement of PG&E's plant staff in the preoperational l testing phase activities to assure familiarity with the plant during l early plant operation. l l 260.8 Attachment 8 to the program description states: " Quality Control performs surveillance inspection over preoperational and startup testing." It is not apparent that this organization (as shown in Figure 17) has personnel with the education / training / experience to perform meaningful surveillance inspection. Discuss. Also discuss the involvement of PG&E QC personnel j in preoperational and startup testing to assure familiarity with the l plant during early plant operations.
,/
- s cucw.
' ~
, . f's UNITED STATES
'. J 'fp '%j
,e
% ;r~qf',,,%/'!
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION wasmucrou. o. c. 20sss e
,g g ( 'i '% ' , , . -
(UL 8 1982 k .! n c. : : 0 fII l
- f(
r & s MEMORANDUM FOR: Robert Tedesco, Assistant Director for Licensing Thomas Novak, Assistant DirectoAfor Operating Reactors Gus Lainas, Assistant Dirtetor for Safety Assessment FROM: Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
BOARD NOTIFICATION 82-72 I have determined that.,the attached information concerning the results of a Region IV investigation at Teledyne should be sent to the appropriate Board and parties in accordance with the procedures of Office Letter No.19. The investigation was stimulated by an allegation relating to the Fitzpatrick and Yankee Electric facilities. The results reflect an audit of the Teledyne internal QA program. Since the investigation may be viewed as a cross-cut of the Teledyne QA program, its results reflect the general level of conformance to QA requirements at Teledyne. It is therefore applicable to all plants for which Teledyne is doing work. These plants include Diablo Canyon, Ferme 2, Summer, Limerick, and the operating reactors listed on the first page of the inspection report. It is the opinion of the staff that this report does not constitute a major safety concern. Issue this as Board Nctification 82-72. s B 7arre i G. isenhut, Dir ctor Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
'3 Stated y <
ggad I['
~/
a,
%g UNITED STATES j -(/,j t
. , + ' v -
i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION wassiscToN, D. C. 20555
-s '
ff Q 0, 0 A. o*Fi ( MS wol ry s '. ~ a ' MEMORANDUM FOR: Those on Attached List FROM: Hans Schierling, Project Manager Design Verification Program Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
DIABLO CANYON BOARD NOTIFICATION 82-67 Attached Board Notification 82-67 was issued on July 1,1982 consist-ing of a letter, also dated July 1, 1982 from H. R. Denton to W. Cooper of Teledyne with a BNL report enclosed. Some copies for the NRC internal distribution did not include the transmittal letter which has now been included. We have determined that the Board Notification packages to the Chairman and the Commissioners were complete packages. We also determined selectively that the addressees on the Board Notification Service List received complete packages.
'. e
& .Q.,>i.N f
Hans Schierling, Project Manager Design Verification Program Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing, NRR
Attachment:
As stated r 1r{c s
/ 9 8 90yf &l
7 Addressees - 2-Document Control (50-275/323) NRC PDR L PDR PRC NSIC LB#3 File F. Miraglia H. Schierling ' H. Denton/E. Case B. Jones, OELD Attorney E. Christenbury, OELD J. Scinto, OELD 1 W f 6
. //. $ C As,5*) & , Nb )
~
bec: (Continued) f " D. Chapell, FCMS:NMSS (VNC;) Fuel Facilities J. Hanchett, Pub. Affairs Offic IE:RV D. Willett, Reactor Inspector JUL 141W2 (VNC).IE:RV R. Fish, (Em. Prep.) IE:RV L. Barry, RM
- R. Scroggins, RM.
E. Triner, RM/B NOTE FOR: Sandy Showman, Administrative Assistant R. Shumway, RM/B to Comissioner Gilinsky J. Clark, RM/BMA L. Underwood, RM/BMA FROM: Edwin G. Triner, Director . RM R/F . Division of Budget and Analysis R/F(5) Office of Resource Management RM/BMA R/F SUBJECT BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR C00911SSIONER GILINSKY'S TRIP TO CALIFORNIA Attached is background information for Comissioner Gilinsky's trip to California. Since I understand he will be visiting with General Electric (GE), information on the Vallecitos Nuclear Center which is owned and operated by GE is provided, in addition to the information you requested on reactors in the State. Information for this report was obtained from the HRR Licensing Project Managers; the NRR Project Manager on the Design Verification Program at . Dia615 Canyon; the Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety NMSSt. the Division of Emergency Preparedness, Inspection and Enforcement. Region V; the Public Affairs Office, Inspection and Enforcement, Region V. Per the NRR Licensing Project Manager and the Division of Enforcement and Investigation, RV, there are no changes to the San Onofre Unit No. 1 report prepared June 29, 1982, attached. If you have any questions, please contact Linda Underwood (x24977) of my staff.
~.
Edwin G. Triner, Director
"[
1 . Division of Budget and Analysis Office of Resource Management Attachments: bec: As stated H. Paulson, W. Rood, NRR:LB-3 NRR:0RB-5 (SONGS (SONGS 1 2 & 3)) A. B. Buckley, Johnson, (Enforcement NRR:LB-3 (Diablo Canyon - SONGS 1))IE:RV cc w/att: J. Roe (II. Schierline NRRtLB-3 (Dilblo Canyon - DVP) g, tjaw ( M. Padovan,BRR:0RB-4 (Ranclo seco)
~
G. Zech S. Droggitis P. Erickson, NRR:0RB-4 (GE Vallecitos BWR; EVESR) J. Wilson, NRR:SSPB NTR; GETR)
%pd 2jg I- T. Rehm D. Clark, NRR:0RB-2 umboldt Bay) (Cont'd at top)
T " m ... w . W ..... .. ....B.4pp4. . . . . . . . W.p. . .......w.B..#... 8. . ..; 6 ........ ..................1
..Barry ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, . ....J..Q..
**> . .nd,9,r,wpp,d,:J,s ,,,,,, C,1 a,7,g,,,,,,, ,,, , ,g,u,may, , , , , Triner 5 :r ,D,,,,,,,,
l can) . .7/. . ......... . .d. .. ../.7/t 8
. . .2
/. . 1. 8 2. . .7//4
. . .f. ./.....................82 7//y/82 7 /82
4 DIABLO CANYON Units Nos. I and 2 Location: 12 miles WSW of San Luis Obispo CA Utility: '
, Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E)
Licensed: Unit No. 1 Low Power Testing 9/22/81 Unit No. 2 Under Construction Power Le, vel: 1084 We; 3338 Mt Type: PWR . . NSSS: Westinghouse Architect / Engineer: Pacific Gas & Electric Licensing Project Manager: Bart Buckley (x28379) NRR Project Manager - Design Verification Program: Hans Schierling (x27238) Resident Inspector: John Carlson (805-595-2353) Schedule Estimated Del,ay Mos. ASLB Decision: 7/82 Comm. Decision 8/82 The delay has been reduced to zero based on the delay due to design errors found at the facility. Design Verification Program underway; plant modifi-cations may be necessary. The results of this program must be considered in the Unit 2 review; plant modifications may be necessary and construction completion for this unit is likely to change. A recent submittal was received on July 1, 1982 from the licensee on Break-water Repair Efforts. 5 (7/13/82)
DIA8LO CANYON Unit No.1 - Design Verification Program A license for Fuel Loading and Low Power Testing was issued to Pacific Gas and Electr;1c (PG&E) on September 22, 1981. An error i'n Seismic Design of Equipment Installation and Piping in Containment was detected by PGAE and reported to NRC late September 1981. Serious weaknesses identified in the fall 1981 in PG&E Design and Quality Assurance Progran.s raised doubt on the adequacy of the plant to withstand . earthquake motion. On November 19, 1981, NRC issued an order suspending the license and issued requirements for a Design Verification Program to be completed prior to restoration of the license for fuel loading and low power testing. (Referred to as Phase I of the Diablo Canyon Design Verification Program.) On November 19, 1981, the NRC informed PG&E of additional Design Verification Program requirements that must be met prior to the issuance of a full power license for Diablo Canyon, Unit No. 1. The activities related to thet part of the program dealing with the full power license (FPL) are referred to as Phase II. (A Hearing on the FPL was completed in January 1982. In June 1982, a motion was made to reopen the Hearing due to QA problems.) Between November 1981 and March 1982 PG&E reassessed effort, defined scope
' and hi'r' ell contractors. Numerous PG&E/NRC discussions and meetings were held.
On March 19,1982, NRC approved Teledyne Engineering Service Olaltham, MA) as independent contractor to conduct Independent Design Verification Program. (Other participants in the Independent Verification Program are R. L. Cloud, Associates, and R. F. Reedy Inc., who had perfomed evaluations of associ-ated Diablo Canyon desi approval of Teledyne.) gn and quality assurance matters prior to the staff On March 22, 1982, PG&E contracted with Bechtel Power Corporation to act as the PG&E project completion manager for Diablo Canyon to fulfill all require- - ments for reinstating the low power Itcense for Unit 1 and for meeting all full ! power license requirements for both units. On June 18,1982, PG&E submitted a Quality Assurance Program for the Diablo i Canyon project, which the NRC staff has under review in addition to other i reviews of various semi-monthly reports on the Independent Design Verification Program. l l The staff currently has under consideration the question of expanding the l. scope of the seismic verification program required of Diablo Canyon Unit 1 prior to fuel load. A decision on this issue will be made before currently ongoing activities in the Phase I program are completed. 6 (7/13/82) i i
e - s S
*/ A 818cg%, J UNITED STATES
! * , . ,. , i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION O -,
s
; WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 j
% . .~.s
..- JUL 161982 Docket No.: 50-275 MEMORANOUM FOR: F. J. Miraglia, Chief. Licensing Branch No. 3. DL FROM: H. E. Schierling, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 3, DL
SUBJECT:
NOTICE OF MEETING WITH BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY (BNL). TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES AND PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. DATE & TIME: Tuesday, July 27, 1982 8:30 AM LOCATION: Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, Long Island, New York Berkner Hall Conference Room Phone: 516-282-2448(M. Reich) PURPOSE: To exchange information and provide clarification regarding the recently issued BNL report, " Independent Seismic Evalua-tion of the Diablo Canyon Unit 1 Containment Annulus Struc-ture and Selected Piping Systems." The information exchange will involve PG&E (including consultants) BNL, Teledyne and the NRC staff. The BNL report was provided by the NRC to Teledyne by letter dated July 1,1982 with a request to con-sider the findings of the report in the IDVP decision making process.
~~
NOTE: Meeting will be transcribed. PARTICIPANTS: NRC: R. Vollmer, J. Knight, P. T. Kuo, H. Polk, M. Hartzman, F. Miraglia, R. Bosnak, T. Bishop and H. Schierling PG&E: H. Friend (Bechtel), J. Hoch, et. al. Teledyne: W. Cooper, et. al. BNL: M. Reich, et. al.
- 7. . . \ .% . .
Hans Schierling, Project Manager Design Verification Program Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing b q'f
#()Y cc w/ attachment:
'f-D pg\ See next page 0
6 . *
- Mr.11alcola H. Furbush
- Vice President - General Counsel ,
Pacific Gas & Electric Company P.O. Box 7442 .
. San Francisco, California 94120 cc: Philip A. Crane, Jr., Esq.
Pacific Gas & Electric Company P.O. Box 7442 San Francisco, California 94120 Janice E. Kerr, Esq. . California Public Lailities Commission 350 M: Allister Street , San Francisco, California 94102 IV. Frederick Eissler*, President Scenic Shoreline Preservation Conference, Inc. 4623 More flesa Drive Santa Barbara, California 93105 Ms. Clizabeth Apfelberg 1415 Cozadero San Luis Doispo, California 93401 Mr. Gordon A. Silver Pts. Sandra A. Silver 1760 Alisal Street San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Harry M. Willis, Esq. Seymour & Willis 601 California Street, Suite 2100 San Fran:isco, California Sa108 Mr. Richard Hubbard itH3 Technical Associates Suite K 1723 Hamilton Avenue San Jose, California 95125 11r. John "arrs, Managing Editor San Luis Obispo County Telegram-Tribune 1321 Johnson Avenue . P. O. Box 112 . San Luis Obispo, California 93406
/
l
a . . Mr. Malcolm H. Furbush 3-A * . Mr. W. C. Gangloff Westinghouse Electri,c Corporation P. O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 - David F. Fleischaker, Esq. ' P. O. Box 1178 ' Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73101 . Arthur C. Gehr, Esq. Snell & Wilmer ., ! 3100 Valley Center p Phoenix, Arizona 85073 ,, . Mr. Owen H. Davis, Director ' Federal Agency Relations , Pacific Gas and Electric Company .f 1050 17th Street, N.W. Suite 1180 Washington, D.c. 20036 > 1 a
\
~
i , 4 i
a
'l.. . ,
'6 j ., ? ll . - -
s 1 i Hr. Malcolm H. Turbush - -2' , e' . , cc: Resident Inspector /Diabla C anyon 'NPS
'c/o U. 5. Nuclear Regulatory Comeission P. 0. Box 369 p Avila Beach, California 93424 ,
r g< Hs. Raye Flemirg 1920 r,attie Roaa ' Shell beach, California 93440 Joel Aeynolos., Esq. ,
' Joan R. Phtilips Esq.
~ Center for law in the Public Interest 10951 West Ficts Soulevara Thiro Floor
,'.';s aogel es , ' Cali forni a 900b4
. Paul C. Valentine, Esq.
' '321 Lytton Avenue *
. Palo Alto, California 94302 Mr. byren S. Georgiov Legal Af f airs Secretary Governor's Of fice State CapitoV Sacratento, California 95h14 Her:ert h. Brown. Esq. . -
Hill Cnristopher & Phillips, P.C.' 19'J O I, Street. N.V. -
'7'a s r i t.g to n , C . C .
20u36 , Mr. Dick Blankenburg, Cottor & Co-Publisher 4 , Scuth County Pucitt,hing Cor.ipany P. O. box 460 . l Arroyo Grance, Cali fornia 93420 Ith James 0. Schuyler vice Fyestcent - AucT sar Generation Departrant .
'Pactfic ' uas & Electric Company .
P.O. kJa 7442 San Francisco, California 94120 L bruce Norton,1sq. Suite 20e ' 3216 korth 3rd Street i Phter,in, Arizona ht.1112 , c- ,
\
t s W, '
w -.e. e-. 1ll 9A w! $ (xouw) wsr AVNOWVd QAOld WVn'llM
.i
/
fl 2 w e i 2 lm - uIm I $ g L .2 3
$ g s .- '
. E c--) som )2 S AVMSS3BdX3 > DAM NVA
^(M3tiddV) S3'HWt c g 7VM.LND ONVMS s N . ,
o f Ia ,, lj3,=;! x D h I!* ' l a Bif f b
.. u - - - _.
~^ ^ ' * ' ' " " ' " ' " ' '
//
49 .
c
. . . , , . . . . . . .c.,
s .'c
- . ' . .t. .
: t. .tc r.'. col (50- 275) -
- iRC iDR LP:R TE?A
*51C LE=3 Files JLee Project :'ana;er_ M 7
w e /HDenton
. - ,,.. g
* ' .t ;r if ild ':1
.o , j if . ' ' . .' 3 )
.:c.:.Alccd
.~ S c h..e n c e r Firaglia "I#: r " . .1 il'er
- u s
.::.as s ell DCrutcnfield T!;pelito O'ni;St
': hrs te n
,:G i '. e r TSpeis RHouston L%benstein FSchroeder
E rns t JKramer (Division Directors - only if participant in meeting) '
Attorney, OELD 1chanalar CISE
- egional administrator, Region _y_
F.esident Inspector ACRS (16) OSD (7)
;RC Participants : R. Vollmer, J. Knight, P. T. Kou, H. Polk, M. Hartzman, F. Miraglia, R. Bosnak & H. Schierling , T. Bishop Teledyne: W. Cooper, et. al.
BNL: M. Reich, et. al. - cc: Service List
,, egg DISTRIBUTIO4:
J .- Document control (50-275) DV
/ 'L6g p#3 LB Docket tio. 50-275 JLee HSchierling
~. Triovak MEf'ORATOUM FOR: Pat Sullivan, Chief Administrative Branch Office of trie Secretary FROM: Hans Schierling, Project Manager Licensing Branch tio. 3 Division of1.icensing
SUBJECT:
REQUEST TRA!4 SCRIPT OF MEETIriG TO BE HELD JULY 27, 1982 - DI ABLO CAtiYO,fi This is to reouest arrangements for a reporter to preapre a transcript of the neeting to be held on July 27, 1982, with Pacific Gas & Electric
- Company, Brookhaven riational 1.aboratory and Teledyne Engineering Services regarding the Diablo Canyon fluclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (see the enclosed meeting notice for details of the meeting). We need the transcript within two days foll$ ding the meetirig so that we can make copies for our internal use as well for the partiss to this proceeding. We anticipate attendance of approxir tely 50 people. Please contact me (x27238) or Jean Lee (x26413) if you np d additional information.
/ .
~
a OridnalSIENI
'/ Hans Schierling, Project fianager
(' / Licensing Branch tio. 3 Division of Licensing
\
Enclosure:
i*eeting notice dtd. 07/16/62 Spov\ mo,aa ? n LE=:: D.
. I...-..-..
LE=3:
.._.y Q c.. e+ : =
DL;;. . o .(. mi. u ,.u ng C7I '32
~
(~ fE';
- C :.7 ; C ! ;. !. 2 ; F C C . C '/ -
8 pa any',I,i
+1 '
. UNITED STATES NUCl. EAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- r. ; wasumarow. o. c.2osss
.,,,,# July 22, 1982 MEMORANDUM FOR: William V. Johnston, Assistant Director for Materials and Qualifications Engineering FROM: Richard H. Vollmer, Director Division of Engineering
SUBJECT:
DIABLO CANYON INTERIM TECHNICAL REPORT
, ON QUALITY ASSURANCE I sent a copy of Teledyne's Interim Technical Report #2 dealing with quality assurance for your review several weeks ago. This particular report is a critical one since the evaluation of the adequacy of Phase I of the Independent Design Verification Program depends on the overall assessment of quality assurance for Phase I activities. Please give me your assessment of the Interim. Technical Report #2 by July 29.
Ql40 - Richard H. Vollmer, Director Division of Engineering cc: J. Knight W. Haass . H. Schierling , V V[;su cI;c 1 23 t g p2W r .
. i saGE7 \
/
y' [o,, UNITED STATES g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
;, ;y WASHINGTON, D. C. 20655
%.,,,,* July 22, 1982
)
MEMORANDUM FOR: James P. Knight, Assistant Director for Components and Structures Engineering FROM: Richard H. Vollmer, Director Division of Engineering
SUBJECT:
DIABLO CANYON IDVP WORK PLAN My memo dated June 23, 1982, requested you to prepare a work plan for the completion of the Diablo Canyon review. Please have a draft of that plan for discussion by July 28, 1982. Enclosed is an interim technical report of the Independent Design Verification Program dealing with tanks. This appears to be the first substantive technical report and needs our prompt attention to determine if the general approach appears adequate. Please give me your comments on that aspect of the report by July 30. The detailed technical evaluation of this report will depend on your overall plan for dealing with the integrated evaluation. M Richard H. Vollmer, Director Division of Engineering cc: H. Schierling W. Johnston R. Bosnak F. Schauer I
- h. b.sc- Cfice fD s \
Q\ a s'Nq l
4 '
. h#ggesfCpk UNITED STATES i,'* . . J[ h
. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
;.- til . y W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 c, t a
'% l l,, / JUL 2 31982 Docket Nos.: 50-275 and 50-323 MEMORANDUM FOR: Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Frank J. Miraglia, Chief Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
DIABLO CANYON PROGRAM - STATUS AND EVENT REPORT Listed below are the major activities on the Diablo Canyon design veri-fication program during the week ending July 17, 1982. Some earlier. inajor activities have been included for completeness. Details on each item are provided in the enclosure.
- 1. NRC/PGE staff discussion (07-09-82) on current issues (a) proposed status meeting (b) proposed BNL report meeting (c) Hosgri report (d) ITR 3 - Qualification of Tanks (e) IDVP - Phase II Plan
'(f) Scope of Phase I/ Phase II (g) IDVP - Phase I Rev.1 Plan (h) Project Schedule (i) Investigation Regarding Allegation'(BN 82-62)
- 2. Status Meeting
- 3. BNL Report Meeting
- 4. Comissioner Gilinsky Information Package
- 5. Semi Monthly Report #17
- 6. Letter to Reynolds and Gov. Br_own
- 7. Scope of Phase I/ Phase II
- 8. Phase II Memo to Comission
- 9. PG&E/Bechtel QA Program
,90 W cg .
- 10. Status Briefing for Commission
- 11. ITR-1 on Additional Verification and Sampling
- 12. ITR-2 on QA Audit The report is provided for your information. If found helpful we would issue the report on a weekly basis. The report will be as factual as possible and will identify where actions are needed by all elements in the Design Verification Program. Your comments will be appreciated.
k . Miraglia, Chief Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing cc: H. Denton R. Vollmer R. Engleken L. Chandler T. Novak J. Knight R. Bosnak W. Haass P. T. Kuo T. Bishop M. Hartzman J. Spraul B. Buckley M. Williams P. Morrill I 1 l l t i l l l t
ENCLOSURE DIABLO CANYON DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM ACTIVITIES 07/12 THROUGH 07/16 l. Meeting on Friday 07/09/82 of H. Schierling (Div. L) with B. Lew (PG&E) to discuss the following: (a) NRC and PG&E Management proposed status meeting - location, date and agenda (see item 2) (b) Proposed meeting on BNL report - location, date and agenda (see item 3) (c) Hosgri Report - discussion also included J. Knight, P. T. Kuo and B. Buckley of staff and H. Friend and R. Ashley of PG&E/Bechtel. Issues were the need and method to update the Hosgri report. Staff and PG&E will inquire with respective counsel. PG&E will inform staff by letter of intended approach. (d) Interim Technical Report #3 (Qualification of Tanks) - Report will be issued shortly by Cloud /Teledyne: is first report on completed technical task and staff comments regarding format are needed for future reports (ITR #3 not received as of 07/16).
-(e) IDVP'- Phase II Plan (submitted 06/18/82) - Plan under staff review (see also item 7 and 8).
(f) Scope of Phase I/ Phase II - Staff stated in 04/27/82 acceptance letter that scope of Phase I regarding adequacy for reinstatement of license has not been decided; advised PG&E that issue is under consideration (see item 7). (g) IDVP - Phase I Revision 1 (submitted 07/03/82) - Rev. I does not identify changes made in text. Apparently many changes made in addition to those requested in 04/27/82 approval letter. Teledyne requests approval of Rev.1. (Recommend that Rev. 1 be returned to Teledyne and all changes be identified through identification in margin or that only
- the requested changes be approved after review. Letter to
' Teledyne needed). (h) PG&E is updating the Project Schedule provided at meeting in ! Waltham(06/10/82). PG&E provided revised schedule which is same but allows for slip. Will be included in next semi-monthly report. (i) PG&E inquired about status of investigation regarding allegations by concerned engineer (Board Notification 82-62). No investigation currently in progress. i l i
C
- 2. Status Meeting - NRC and PG&E management discussed need for status meeting. Staff developed proposed agenda for meeting (attached).
Meeting most likely to be in San Fransisco, no date has been agreed on. (Needed: management coments on agenda and availability dates see also item 1.(a)).
- 3. BNL Report Meeting - Meeting scheduled for 07/27/82 at Brookhaven for Teledyne (Cooper) to obtain additional information on BNL report. Meet-ing will allow for information exchange between BNL and PG&E. Meeting notice dated 07/16/82.
(Needed: staff /BNL pre-meeting conference on procedures for meeting to assure independence).
- 4. Commissioner Gilinsky Infonnation Package - Prepared background information package on Diablo Canyon for Comissioner Gilinsky's trip to California.
- 5. Semi-Monthly Report 17 - received reports from PG&E, Teledyne, Cloud, Reedy and Stone & Webster. Reports docketed and distributed, Board Notification initiated.
(Needed: Board Notification approval).
- 6. Letter to Reynolds and Gov. Brown (07/08/82) . requesting comments on Phase II of IDVP (see items 1.(e), 7).
- 7. Scope of Phase I/ Phase II - proposed draft memo from Div. L to Div. E et. al. requesting connents on scope of Phase I/ Phase II in light of findings in first Interim Technical Reports.
(Reevaluation of requirements in Order CLI 81-30 urgently needed for meaningful review of Phase II IDVP plan).
- 8. Phase II Memo to Commission - responded to Connis'sioner Ahearne concern about staff approval of Phase II plan.
- 9. PG&E/Bechtel QA Program - letter to PG&E regarding need for information and additional clarification of QA program; letter in concurrence with input from QAB and RV; expected to be issued week of 07/19.
- 10. Status Briefing for Commission - prepared draft of status briefing paper for Div. L.
(Need comments).
- 11. ITR - 1 Additional Verification and Sampling (06/09/82) - report under staff review. Received input form OIE (06/24/82) and form Div. E (07/01/82).
Further detailed review underway by Div. E. Conclusion must be considered in item 7.
- 12. ITR - 2 QA Audit (06/24/82) - Staff review in progress. Note that QA reports by Reedy were of concern to staff regarding adequacy of Phase I; however, Teledyne evaluation of report does not seem to indicate such concern.
-13. Letter to Reynolds/Fleishaker responding to 05/02/82 letter with 7 con-cerns in concurrence.
- (
C
...=,..i-
~
L ATTACHMENT DIABLO CANYON DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM MEETING SUBJECTS
- 1. Overview of Current Status of Phase I IDVP(Teledyne)
PG&E Technical Program and Blume Internal Review (PG&E)
- 2. Additional Verification and Sampling - Phase I First ITR (Cloud)
Current Status (Cloud and PG&E) i
- 3. Phase ! - Quality Assurance Audit Second ITR (Teledyne)
- 4. Qualification of Tanks Third ITR (Cloud)
- 5. BNL Report Status of Teledyne Review (Teledyne)
- 6. IDVP Phase I Plan - Rev. I (Teledyne)
- 7. Phase II of Design Verification Program Current Status of IDVP and work in program (Teledyne)
Stone & Webster activities (S&W) R. F. Reedy activities (R. F. Reedy) PG&E Internal Technical Program (PG&E)
- 8. QA Program for PG&E/Bechtel Integrated Project Organization (PG&E/NRC)
- 9. Integrated Project Schedule (PG&E)
- 10. Communications among Design Verification Program Participants and Independence of Participants (NRC)
- 11. Final Report Phase I, Format (PG&E ana TES)
- 12. Review of 79-02 in Design Verification Program (PG&E)
- 13. Comments by Parties -
^y
. p>* * * * % . .
UNITED STATES
.f 'q ,. "i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i%. fr , g,~,,;2 g/e. , j WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555
?
S..... July 27, 1982 OFFICE OF THE SECR E T ARY COMJA-82-6 MEMORANDUM FOR: William J. Dircks, Executive Director for Operations i FROM: Samuel J. Chilk, Secreta j
SUBJECT:
DIABLO CANYON REVERIFICATIONi PROGRAM V i
- Please arrange to brief the Commission prior to NRR giving approval Canyon. for the Phase II Reverification Plan for Diablo Also, provide the Commission with a monthly status report on the Diablo Canyon Reverification Program.
cc: Chairman Palladino Commissioner Gilinsky Commissioner Ahearne Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Asselstine OGC OPE OPA OCA NRR 1 l l t 1 i l l 3 Rec'd Off. EDO Ds:c }U Time . .'.'.2.O. .d.
. .U.y
......a M ~~
\\
[c)( {h' EIO7050037 l l l I
i e <
.
- f ./
UNITED STATES [pm EECg .[og NUCLEAR REGULATORY t'OMMisSION p fj f d, ,,", ;
*- WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 -
- z. m.... /
JUL 2 7 1982 MEMORANDUM FOR: F. J. Miraglia, Chief, Licensing Branch 3 Division of Licensing, NRR FROM: R. L. Baer, Chief, Engineering and Technical Support Branch,DEQA,IE
SUBJECT:
PART 21 REPORT ON PIPESD COMPUTER, PROGRAM The enclosed Part 21 report from Control Data Corporation (CDC) identified an error in the computer program PIPESD used for piping analysis. This computer program has been used to perform piping analyses at Diablo Canyon. The enclosed notification states, "Results from time history load cases and response spectrum cases are unaffected." Therefore, the error should not affect the current seismic analysis work at Diablo Canyon. We have requested that Region IV review the extent of the error during their current inspection at CDC to verify that seismic analysis results will not be affected. Based on the enclosed notification, the error requires several conditions to be present and should apply to a limited number of analyses. However since&the computer program was used at Diablo, there is a' potential that some non dynamic (thermal, deadweight, etc.) analyses could be affected by the error. y 4 Robert L. Baer, Chief Engineering and Technical l . Support Branch Division of Engineering and Quality Assurance
. Office 'of Inspection and Enforcement Enclosure :
As stated l cc: E. Jordan, IE A. Dromerick, IE l J. Fair, IE H. Schierling, NRR R. Brickley, RIV R. Bosnak, NRR U. Mills, IE B. Buckley, NRR I b (96j'ds .Lp
/\ _, [
- 8100 34m Avenue Soum Me.4.ng Address / Box o );*
-m -- - k C h'.O Minne ooks. Minneseta 55440 %./ Q
( M as CONTROL DATA
# t m' CORPOR6 TION (fA - ! l g g, July 7, 1982 Mr. Victor Stello, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement ~
Nuclear Stegulatory Commission 7735 Old Georgetown Road Bethesda , MD 20814
Dear Mr. Stello:
This letter is provided to report a potential error condition in a computer software program which Control Data Corporation makes available to users of its CYBERNET computer system. Control Data Corporation is unable to evaluate whether this error condition could create a " defect" as defined by 10CFR21, and, therefore, has notified its customers by letter dated July 7, 1982, in order that they may cause the error condition to be evaluated. g The error condition exists in the computer program PIPESD ( tite
" program") which can be used by Control Data customers to pet-form pipe stress analysis. The program operates on Control Data's CYBERNET computer systems, under control of the SCOPE 3.4 and NOS operating systems at data centers located in: Rockville, Maryland; Houston, Texas; Sunnyvale, California; Waltham, Massachusetts.
The program is the proprietary product of URS/ John A.' Blume & Associates, Engineers, 130 Jessie Street, San Francisco, California 94105. A list of customers who were notified is enclosed together with a copy of Control Data's notification letter which has been sent to each of the customers. This list includes both customers who may have and may not have used PIPESD in nuclear work. The nature of the error condition, and the corrective action which should be taken by users to avoid further errors, are described in the enclosed notice to customers. n <0 pW pd - x .3
Mr. Victor Stello Page 2 July 7, 1982 Information concerning the error condition was obtained by the undersigned on July 6, 1982. 'Further information is available by contacting Margo Berg, COMSOURCE/CYBERNET Quality Assurance, Control Data Corporation, 8100-34th Avenue South, P.O. Box 0, Mail Station HQCO20, Minneapolis, MN 55440, telephone (612) 853-6327.
~~
Sincerely, CONTROL DATA CORPORATION
// s O. K..Staton Vice President COMSOURCE PR0530D-C Enclosures g.
cc: Jeffrey L. Egeberg e Department Manager, Equipment & Piping ' URS/ John A. Blume & Associates, Engineers 130 Jessie Street San Francisco, CA 94105 l l l t l I 1
(Current Date) I (Address) Control Data Corporation would like to inform you that a potential error condition has been detected in the computer. program PIPESD which is available on CYBERNET SCOPE 3.4 and NOS . operating systems. When modeling an elastic spring support, the PIPESD user must specify several parameters including support grid point number,
- support type, support spring stiffness, and choice of " global" or " inclined" support direction. In the.ev._ent that
- 1) One or more " global" and one or more " inclined" supports, or
- 2) Two or more " inclined" supports are specified on the same support grid point number, PIPESD may incorrectly calculate the support reactions. Results from time history load cases and response spectrum cases are unaffected.
URS/ John A. Blume and Associates has researched the extent of ~ 3 this problem through earlier program versions. It appears to i exist as early as Version 4.0 of PIPESD (circa 1975) and i probably as early as Version 3.0 (circa 1974). URS/Blumehasidentifiedamethodofa~voidingtheproblemuntk a correction can be released. A description of this method is. ~ enclosed as Attachment A. In addition, Control Data may be able to assist you in determining whether your runs of PIPESD have been affected by this condition. Please contact our PIPESD support analysts, Ruben Hillar at (612) 482-3176 or Richard Tollefsrud at (612) 482-2898, if you require this assistance. A revised version of PIPEhD is being prepared by URS/Blume to , correct the problem which is herein reported. This revised version will be made available to Control Data's CYBERNET users as soon as possible after it is received from URS/Blume. Until that time, the workaround described in Attachment A should be , used. 4 e
- , - . . , . v-.-_, c _. __ -,_,_,._.-,_.--~._,,.-r--,.,..-,-w m-., . ..,_.,e --
, , - , w.-7-, ..--y y,--- -
The error described in this notification is subject to your
- evaluation as to whether it has caused a " defect" as defined by t 10CFR21. Control Data Corporation believes this condition warrants reporting to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and you are hereby notified that such a report has been made effective July 7, 1982.
Should you require more information or assistance relative to this matter, pleas.e contact your local Control Data CYBERNET sales representative or myself at (612) 853-6327. Your signa'ture on and return of the attached transmittal form is requested. Thank you. Sincerely,, , ,,
)
CONTROL DATA CORPORATION Margo J. Berg COMSOURCE/CYBERNET - Quality Assurance ( PR0529D-C E t 4
e Attachment A PIPESO Modelling-in lieu of defining an " inclined" support in combination with a global f or another inclined support at the same grid point, the following procedure is recommended. Each support should be modelled individually on separate grid points such that the distance between the points is one-half (1/2) inch or less. Example: two horizontal supports on a riser , 7 #3 11 o ,4 - jy 72 0 4 -
',, ,' ~5 r 75 ,
75, f
/N '
20 e , y s. so ~x g- cs Os 5 0-
ERROR. REPORT TRANSMITTAL I' l Error Report Transmitted PIPESD - Possible incorrect static results using skew & global support combinatici Date of Error Report July 7, 1982
"~
Transmitted to: Received by: (signature) (date) f Please sign and return this transmittal to: COMSOURCE/CYBERNET Quality Assurance
- CONTROL DATA CORPORATION P.O. Box 0 - HQCO2O Minneapolis, MN 55440 O i i... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _
_ _ ~ _. _ . - . -- . _ . . _ . _. e . Reid McNally, Jr. Rick White - c= AAA technology & Specialties, Inc. Ceramic Cooling Tower Company Control Data Business Center 2821 West 7th Street i 2425-West Loop' South Fort Worth , TX 76101 i Suite 105 . l Houston, TX 77056 Carson Blanton, Jr. Corporate Consulting Aerojet; Liquid Rocket Company and Development-Company Ltd. P.O. Box 13222 . P.O. Box 30096 Sacramento, CA'95813 Raleigh, NC 27622 i Russ Spencer- Curtiss Wright Corporation i Applied Nucleonics Company Nuclear Division 9937 Jefferson Boulevard One Passaic Street Culver City., CA 90230 WoodrLdge, NJ 07075 Bob Branch Don Green Baldwin and Gregg, Ltd. CYGNA Energy Systems 620 May Avenue 141 Battery Battery Street Norfolk, VA 23504 Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94111 Bechtel Power Corporation P. O. Box 3965 Roland Yang San Francisco, CA 94119 Transamerica Delaval Inc. Engine: Compressor Division Rich Mann 550 85th Avenue Boeing Computer Services Oakland, CA 94621-P. O. Box 24346 MS IE-85 poyle Byrd g Seattle, WA 98124 D' uke Power Company Design Engineering Department
- Hugh O'Connor P. O. Box 2178 Boston Edison Company Charlotte, NC 28233 800.Boylston Street
> Boston, MA 02199 Mr. Harold Durlofsky 1141 West olive Joseph Gorga Sunnyvale, CA 94086 Burns and Roe Inc. - 650 Winters Avenue - Mr. J. Santosuosso Paramus, NJ 07652 EBASCO Services Two World Trade Center-79 Fl. i Mr. Song Tsai New York, NY 10048 1 Catalytic, Inc. i Centre Square West R. W. Haupt ! 1500 Market Street ECHO Energy Consultants Inc. i Philadelphia, PA 19102 1615 Broadway, Suite 800 Oakland, CA 94612 Henry Lenfest j Central Maine Power Compar.y Bob Earl Edison Drive EDS Nuclear Inc. i Augusta, ME 04336 220 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94104 . i
. - - - . . - . ~ . - - _ - - _ _ , _ . - _ - _ - . , ---. - . _ .. - - _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ - -
~
a ,- Energy Inc. Giffels Associates Shane Building 243 West Congress Street P. O. Box 736 Detroit, MI 48226 Idaho Falls, ID 83401 Altay Cataloglu ' Engineering Analysis Services Global Marine Development Inc. P. O. Box 657 2302 Martin Street Greenwich, RI 02818 Irvine, CA 92715 Engineering Research and. Design Hallanger Engineers 1441 Kapiolani Boulevard 1621 114th Avenue S.E. Suite 208 Bellevue, WA 98004 Honolulu, HI 96814 Heat Engineering: Supply Company ENRIQUE TUA. SON 1212,4 East Romona Boulevard 30 Brighton Court El Monte, CA 91732 Daly City, CA 94015 IMODC0 Ashok Damre 10960 Wilshire Boulevard Environgenics System Company Suite 1100 9255 Telstar Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90024 El Monte, CA 91731 INTERCOMP Resource Development Facilities Systems Engineering and Engineering 2305 Utah Avenue 1201 Dairy Ashford El Segundo, CA 90245 Houston, TX 77079 Won Choi Price Stiffler Fluor Corporation Interational Engineering &C ompany 3333 Michelson Drive l'80 Howard Street Irvine, CA 92730 San Francisco, CA 94105 y Frank Pizzimenti David Cameron Fredericksen Engineering Company ITT Grinnell Corporation 1755 Broadway Pipe Hanger Division Oakland, CA 94612 95 Cedar Street Providence, RI 02915 Dave Clack GCN Hydronet Services - Tom Branca 1036 West Robinhood, Suite 106 John Henry Associates Inc. Stockton, CA 95207 126 New Boston Park Woburn, MA 01801 Marilyn Hicks General Electric Company Ben Balter 1 River Road , Kaiser Engineers Inc. Building 2, Room 616 P. O. Box 23210 Schenectady, NY 12305 Oakland, CA 94623 Don Fiero Ms. Ann Cooper Genesee Computer Center Karagozian and Case 20 University Avenue 963 W. Colorado Blvd. Rochester, NY 14605 Los Angeles, CA 90041 O
Leanna Harris Dick Birmingham Occidental Engineering Company Lockheed-California Company P. O. Box 551 2100 South East Main Street Burbank, CA 91520 Irvine, CA 92714 Eric Darst Mike Tresler MCFALL-KONKEL'E KIMBALL' Pacific Gas & Electric 2160 South clermont Street 77 Beale Street Denver, CO 80222 , San Francisco, CA 94106
, Ming Chen . Pipe Line Technologists Mechanical Technology Inc. Charlie Hethcoat 968 Albany Shaker Road 1201 Dairy Ashford Latham, NY 12110 Houston, TX 77079
~ ~
Metcalf & Eddy Inc. Robert L. Cloud Assoc. 6802 Culebra Road
- 2972 Adaline Street San Antonio, TX' 78238 Berkeley, CA 94703
'r.
M MPR Lutchenkov Associates, Inc. Dr. Ming Chang Sante Fe Engineering Services 1140 Connecticut Avenue N.W. 505 South Main Washington, DC 20036 Orange, CA 92668 NCR Corporation Sam Patel Manager DSSD Schneider Consulting Engineers 16550 West Bernardo Drive 98 Vanadium Road San Diego, CA 92127 Bridgeville, PA 15017 Mr. Shenouti Bishay Yeff Hansen New England Electric System Schumacher & Associates c 20 Turnpike Road 2550 Fair Oaks Boulevard
- Westboro, MA 01581 Sacramento, CA 95825 Pete Suleski, QA Dept. Art Finkelstein Northern States Power Company Stewart-Davis Inc.
414 Nicollet Avenue 3200 Cherry Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55401 - Long Beach, CA 90807 Ted Kettler SVERDRUP-ARO, INC. Nuclear Energy Services 600 North Jackson Street Shelter Rock Road Tullahoma, TN 37389 Danbury, CT 06810 Thermogenics Mr. Martin Plante 2300 County Center Drive Nuclear Power Services Inc. Suite 250
'150 Meadowlands Parkway Santa Rosa, CA 95401 Secaucus, NJ 07094 NUS Corporation 4 Research Place l Rockville, MD 20850 i
l i I
-. - - - - , - . - - - . . . . --, - - - - . . - , . - , - . , - - - , - , . , , - . - - - - . . , , , . ~ - - . . . . . _ - - , . - - - - - , - - - - - - -
,,s-TIPPETT & GEE R. A..Wlodek 502 North Willis . Commonwealth Associates, Inc.
Abilene, TX 79603 209 E. Washington Avenue
- Jackson, MI 49201 Attn: V. P. Engineering USA Petrochem Corporation Reid Francis 4777 Crooked Palm Road Buon Accorsi & Associates Ventura, CA 93001 545 Mission Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Bill Cain Veizades and Associates Mike Adams -
594 Howard Street Del Monte San Francisco, CA 94105 Box 3575 San Francisco, CA 94119 W. J. Wooll_ey Company . ,, 7425 West Lake Street Jim Pitter River Forest, IL 60305 Eikonix Corporation 23 Crosby Drive James Anderson Bedford, MA 01752 Westinghouse-Hanford P. O. Box 1970 Wm. J. Jones Richland, WA 99352 Tri-Valley ; 1324 Concannon Blvd Paul Householder Livermore, CA 94550 WHB Associates.Inc. - 3175 Linwood Avenue Cincinnati, OH 45208 PR0543D-C Eck Ruddick ,~ g3 Williams Bros. Engineering Company 6600 South Yale ,e Tulsa, OK 74177 Mr Marian Motyl-Szary, Manager Computer Services Department Yankee Atomic 1671 Worcester Road ~ Framingham, HA 01701 - Terry Phelan Ziel-Blossom & Associates 23 East 7th Street Cincinnati, OH 45202 Sandy White, Mechanical Dept. South Service Corporation - 800 Shades Creek Parkway Birmingham, AL 35209 Ed Roundtree Nuclear Structures, Inc. 4470 Chamblee Dunwoody Road Atlanta, GA 30338 4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _}}