ML20212J162
| ML20212J162 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 01/21/1987 |
| From: | Rivenbark G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Muller D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8701280097 | |
| Download: ML20212J162 (23) | |
Text
c.
January 21, 1987 Dockets Nos. 50-321/366 DISTRIBUTION DocketJHee ~
NRC PDR/L PDR MEMORANDUM FOR: Daniel R. Muller, Project Director PD#2 Memo BWR Project Directorate #2 DRMuller/GRivenbark Division of BWR Licensing OGC-Bethesda EJordan/BGrimes FROM:
George Rivenbark, Project Manager ACRS(10)
BWR Project Directorate #2 NRC Participants Division of BWR Licensing
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF MEETING WITH GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, HATCH UNIT 1 AND 2 A meeting with representatives of Georgia Power Company (GPC) and personnel from the NRC was held at the NRC's offices in Bethesda, Maryland on November 20, 1986. The principal reason for the meeting was to have GPC describe its procedure upgrade project (PUP) as a followup to our brief discussion en the subject during the November 4,1986 Quarterly NRC/GPC meeting on Hatch.
The presentation on the PUP was given by E. J. Towpin of GPC who manages the PUP. There are about 5000 procedures. Of these, about 1500 have been completed up to the validation stage but have not been validated and about 500 have been validated. The enclosed charts used in the presentation graphically describe the elements of the program, its progress to date, and the organization that is involved in accomplishing this task.
It is the goal of this project to complete the upgrade of all procedures by the end of 1987.
In addition to the presentation on the PUP, GPC made presentations describing their Security Training and Emergency Preparedness Program for Hatch. These presentations were given by Morris Howard who manages these activities for GPC.
-The charts used in the presentations by Messrs Towpin and Morris provide a good summary of the information discussed. They are enclosed along with a list of meeting attendees.
Ori.fre!:! ned by George Rivenbark, Project Manager BWR Project Directorate #2 Divisi.on of BWR Licensing
Enclosures:
As stated cc w/ enclosures:
See next page DB DBL P -
GR v 1 bark /cd DR l /V /87 j ly) /87
^
0FFICIAL RECORD roov ko P
Mr. J. P. O'Reilly Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Georgia Power Company Units Nos. I and 2 cc:
Bruce W. Chruchill, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 2300 N Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20037 A
Mr. L. T. Gucwa Engineering Department Georgia Power Company Post Office Box 4545 Atlanta, Georgia 30302 Nr. H. C. Nix, Jr., General Manager Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Georgia Power Company Post Office Pox 442 Baxley, Georgia 31513 Mr.' Louis B. Long Southern Company Services, Inc.
Post Office Box 2625 Birmingham, Alabama 35202 Pesident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Route 1, Post Office Box 279 Baxley, Georgia 31513 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 101 Marietta Street, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Mr. Charles H. Badger Office of Planning and Budget Room 610 270 Washington Street, S.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30334 Mr. J. Leonard Ledbetter, Commissioner Department of Natural Resources 270 Washington Street, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30334 Chairman Appling County Commissioners County Courthouse Baxley, Georgia 31513 T
._m
ATTENDANCE LIST NOVEMBER 20, 1986 MEETING WITH GPC TO DISCUSS HATCH PROCEDURES UPGRAD PROGRAM NAME ORGANIZATION G. Rivenbark NRC/BWD2 D. Nuller NRC/BWD2 H. Abelson NRC/BWD2 C. Shulten NRC/BWF0 J. Heidt GPC Licensing E. J. Towpin GPC Nuclear Projects E. M. Howard GPC Sec. Emerg. Prep. & Tng.
f r_._-
,m
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY PLANT HATCH PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROJECT MAJOR UNDERTAKING TO IMPROVE PROCEDURES PHASE I
LARGE CONTRACT LAY FO U N DATION ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL PROCEDURES WRITERS GUIDES NUMBERING SYSTEM PHASE II UPGRADE ALL PROCEDURES TOP PRIORITY SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER MAKE PROCEDURES BEST IN IN DUSTRY
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY P LANT HATC H PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROJECT ORGANIZATION PROJECT MANAGER l
PROJECT COORD!NATOR I
I I
I ADMIN I OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE I
MISC 1
SUPPORT e
(
(
k EMERGENCY MAINTENANCE ALL ADMIN ABNORMAL I AND C OTHERS SUPPORT OPERATIONS 23/10 GPC 23/4 GPC 18/4 GPC 26/7 GPC 12 SRO-11 RO 13 YRS EXP 12 YRS EXP 7 DEGREED 2 SRO SPECIALISTS 8 DEGREED TOTAL PERSONNEL 92/26 GPC
m GEORGIA POWER COMPANY PLANT HATCH PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROJECT (COM MITM ENTS )
C REG GUIDES NUREGS CODES STANDARDS ENVIRONMENTAL )
SAFETY EVALUATION DRAFi V
QUALIFICATION j
l PROCEDURE f
CWALKDOWN DRAWINGS )
SYSTEM i
ABN, DCR j PROCEDURE
[
VENDOR )
( OTHER 1
INFORMATION I
I SYSTEM ENG k
j
( UTILITIES OPERATOR
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY P LA.NT H ATC H PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROJECT PROCEDURE Y
REVIEWS REGUL.ATORY COMPLIANCE OTHER I
DEPARTMENTS V
QUALITY ASSURANCE
>I TECHNICAL
_g SPONSOR (ACP)
SPONSOR REVIEW WRITER I f TECHNICAL PROCEDURE EDITOR REVIEW GROUP V
DEPARTMENT MANAGER
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY P LANT H ATC H.
PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROJECT PROCEDURE APPROVAL /ISSU E FOR VALIDATION PLANT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT MANAGER PL. ANT MANAGER 9
VALIDATIO N ACTUAL PERFORMANCE WALK THROUGH/ SIMULATION TALK THROUGH COMPARISON TRAINING ISSUED FOR USE
e GEORGIA POWER COMPANY PLANT HATCH PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROJECT l
ACCO M P LIS H M ENTS/SCH ED U LE 9
1986 l
COMPLETED EOP FLOW CHARTS AND END PATH MANUALS APPENDIX "R" RELATED PROCEDURES PLANT SUPPORT PROCEDURES MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES l
1987 COMPLETE UPGRADE OF ALL PROCEDURES
PUP PROCEDURES PLAN ALL GROUPS DRAFTS COMPLETE 1.6 1.5
/,a49 I
1.32 1435 1.2 11 73/
96 11
'/
/
h 1.0 7' /
p
- n..$
og
/
o una oa 0.8
'n!
80/-.
6 95
-E 0.7 gG
/
E O6 a
5
/,/ 6. so 0.5
" [Mb9 0.4 M
?-
269
/
O.3 uz 7
M 4 un 0.2 ss 6
01
- 1J4 r
0.05C J
F M
A M
J J
A S
O 't N
D 1986 ACCELERATED PLAN ACTUAL
l II D
iN 6
5 O
- /
5 O
g S
1 NA E
LT
~
2 E
PL i
A L
P A
C A
E S
0 ;
J RFT 3
3
~ A URD 6
D 3
2 8
P 2/
EU J
9 1
O CRG O
S 9
RN o
0 M
N O
2 2
A PT P
I L
AR E
PP U
O A
3 P
5 M
9 F
2
=
I I
0 0
0 0
0 M
0 0
0 0
0 0
7 6
5 4
3 2
a!
m[a
li 2
D o
S N
6 7
o 0
s O
5 L
AUTCA S
f9 5
N At L
3 tL 2
b PP A
4 MO SC ES T D
J 3/
6 RFA URD DP p
8 EU z
J 9
l O
1 R
CG OEC u
RN l
a M
N iz A
A PN L
E P
TN D
PI E
A Y
A T
UM AR P
ELE C
M C
J A
77,2 F
J
, 5 0
0 0
0 0
0 o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 o
7 6
5 4
3 2
sa.
,I\\
l' 8,
D f
N
/
7 0
3 0
O 2
4 '
8 7
b S
N
/'
/,
E AT I
E L L 4
PP 3
A L
M M
AU O
S
/
T C
C S
A ET 8'
F 5
J RA 1
R UD DU W
P 68 J
9 EO
/
1 R
1 CG S
OU 7,'
O 6
M N
RE 9
A N
L PA P
I IF PC 4
S A
UMI 6
P
' 7 5
M
/-
.[4*
F 2'f 2
J 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
g 0
0 8
6 4
2 0
8 6
4 2
0 8
6 2
2 2
2 2
2 1
1 1
1 1
nbo hIo
=
1l
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY PLANT HATCH PROCEDURE UPGRADE PROJECT ADDITIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS 0
REFERENCE MATERIAL LIBRARY ENHANCED COMPUTERIZED PROCEDURE CROSS REFERENCE WELDING PROGRAM MANUAL GLOSSARY OF TERMS, DEFINITIONS ABBREVIATIONS, ACRONYMS E.
O. PROCEDURE
MANUAL COMPUTERIZED COMMITMENTS MATRIX TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVISION 1
1
is SECURITY 0
ORGANIZATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS SECURITY ASSIGNED AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF NUCLEAR OPERATIONS STAFFED WITH EXPERIENCED PERSONNEL AT CORPORATE LEVEL AND PLANT LEVEL UPGRADED PLANT SECURITY ORGANIZATION GREATER DISCIPLINE O
PHYSICAL SECURITY PLAN UPDATED UNDER REVIEW G
TRAINING INCREASED SECURITY TRAINING STAFF SPECIALIZATION UPGRADED PHYSICAL FITNESS AND TRAINING REQUIREMENTS.
4 0
PROCEDURES REVIEWED FOR NECESSARY ACTIONS UPGRADE IN PROGRESS 1
. +: ".
SECURITY (CONT.)
ACCESS FACILITIES MODIFICATIONS IN DESIGN - V0GTLE REPLACEMENT BUDGETED F R 1987 - HATCH 9
SECURITY LABOR CONTRACT - HATCH FULL 3-YEAR AGREEMENT UPGRADES WAGES ESTABLISHED SPECIALIZATION STABILIZES CAS/SAS POSITION 0
AUTOMATED SECURITY SYSTEM - HATCH IMPROVED SOFTWARE UPGRADED E-FIELD UPS PERFORMANCE IMPROVED MICROPROCESSOR ADDED SYSTEM REPLACEMENT BUDGETED FOR 1988 2
l'A P
, 2.
... ~..,,..
TRAINING TRAINING IS NOW AN INTEGRAL PART OF EVERY DAY OPERATIONS AND IS AN EQUAL PARTNER WITH ALL OTHER ACTIVITIES.
OUR PASS RATE OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS FOR NEW LICENSE APPLICATIONS IS 96%.
WE HAVE A MATURE PROGRAM IN PLACE WHICH WE CONTINUE TO BUILD ON.
9 TRAINING FACILITIES AMONG THE BEST IN THE INDUSTRY SIMULATORS MAINTAINED TO REFLECT CONTROL CONFIGURATIONS ON A REAL TIME BASIS INTEGRATED GPC SKILLS TRAINING AND FACILITIES INTO NUCLEAR OPERATIONS TRAINING 3
TRAINING (CONT.)
9 ACCREDITATION STATUS t
SEVEN OF TEN PROGRAMS ARE ACCREDITED SELF-EVALUATION REPORTS FOR REMAINING THREE PROGRAMS SUBMITTED IN MARCH 1986 ONLY SIX OF SIXTY-0NE UTILITIES HAVE MORE ACCREDITED PROGRANS AS OF 10-2-86 OUR PROGRAMS ARE TREATED LIKE THEY ARE ACCREDITED.
ALL ARE BEING TAUGHT l
WE ARE PERFORMING OUR OWN " ACCREDITATION" REVIEW 0F THE THREE PROGRAMS NOT YET ACCREDITED f
i i
4 1
TRAINING (CONT.)
8 MANAGEMENT OF TRAINING RECORDS PROGRAM UNDER DEVELOPMENT IN-HOUSE SINCE APRIL 1986 SYSTEM WILL SERVE CORPORATE AND THE TWO NUCLEAR FACILITIES DATA IS BEING LOADED FULLY OPERATIONAL IN DECEMBER 1986 MANAGEMENT / SUPERVISION WILL BE ABLE TO REQUEST INFO BY FUNCTION OR BY INDIVIDUAL NAMES 1
5
f#
4 S
E w
a4Ie+b e4 m.&
4 4
a e d
'.=
A
A O
a 9
TRAINING (CONT.)
O COLLEGE DEGREE TRAINING PROGRAM AMERICAN TECHNICAL INSTITUTE CURRENTLY ON PLANT HATCH SITE LEADS TO A FOUR YEAR BACCALAUREATE DEGREE IN NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTED AS A CANDIDATE FOR ACCREDITATION BY THE SOUTHERN ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES CURRENTLY 21 TOTAL STUDENTS ENROLLED I
s k
6
.T
.. ' ~
TRAINING (CONT.)
9 REQUALIFICATION TRAINING SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS SINCE 1984 4
PARTICIPATED IN " PILOT" PROGRAM WITH REGION II TO EVALUATE-INDUSTRY'S ABILITY TO ADMINISTER THE REQUAL PROGRAM 4
OUR REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM HAS MATURED 9
MANAGEMENT-IN-TRAINING GEORGIA POWER COMPANY HAS TAKEN THE INITIATIVE IN PREPARING FUTURE SENIOR MANAGEMENTS FORMAL TRAINING PROGRAM & ROTATION TRAINING WE ARE NOT RESTING ON OUR LAURELS.
EACH DAY WE LOOK FOR WAYS OF DOING OUR JOB MORE EFFECTIVELY AND EFFICIENTLY THROUGH OUR SELF-ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE INDIVIDUAL AND COLLECTIVE EFFORTS OF THE TRAINING STAFF.
7
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AT GEORGIA POWER HAS HAD A HISTORY OF EXCELLENCE AND WE ARE CONTINUING TO STRENGTHEN THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF OUR RESPONSE CAPABILITY.
O WE HAVE HAD SEVERAL IMPORTANT MILESTONES THIS YEAR PLANT V0GTLE'S EMERGENCY RESPONSE CAPABILITY WAS NOT A HEARING ISSUE 1
PLANT V0GTLE'S DRILL RESULTED IN A FEMA REPORT WITH NO ADVERSE FINDINGS PLANT HATCH'S ALERT AND NOTIFICATION SYSTEM WAS TESTED AND FOUND ACCEPTABLE TO FEMA i
i 8,
.e EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (CONT. )
~
9 IN ADDITION TO LEARNING FROM OUR PAST PERFORMANCE WE ARE i
GIVING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS CORPORATE IDENTITY STRENETHENING OUR ST AFF WITH HIGHLY QUALIFIED PERSONNEL INCRE ASING THE EYE-TO-EYE CONT ACT WITH ST ATE AND COUNTY EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PERSONNEL ST ATE AND COUNTY SUPPORT CONTINUING CONSTRUCTING AN EMERGENCY N"WS CENTER AND A ST ATE FORWARD EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER AS I ST ATED WITH OUR TRAINING PROGRAMS WE CONTINUALLY SEEK WAYS TO
-IMPROVE AND ENHANCE OUR PROGRAM.
WE LOOK AT OUR OWN PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF T HE REST OF T HE INDUST RY.
WE LE ARN FROM BOT H.
9