ML20212H356

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-317/98-01 & 50-318/98-01 on 980208-0314 & Forwards NOV Re Failure to Provide Complete & Accurate Info Concerning Behavior of Dry Shielded Canister in License Application for ISFSI
ML20212H356
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/15/1998
From: Doerflein L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Cruse C
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
Shared Package
ML20212H360 List:
References
50-317-98-01, 50-317-98-1, 50-318-98-01, 50-318-98-1, EA-98-173, NUDOCS 9804210354
Download: ML20212H356 (5)


See also: IR 05000317/1998001

Text

._

_

--

)

,

4

p

April 15, 1998

EA 98-173

Mr. Charles H. Cruse

Vice President - Nuclear Energy

Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (BGE)

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant

1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway

Lusby, MD 20657- 4702

.

SUBJECT:

NRC REGION 11.'dTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-317/98-01

AND 50-318/98-01 AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION

'

Dear Mr. Cruse:

This report transmits the findings of the safety inspection conducted by NRC inspectors at

the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant from February 8,1998 to March 14,1998. The

enclosed report presents the results of that inspection. At the conclusion of the

'

inspection, the::e findings were discussed with Mr. Katz and others of your staff.

Overall, the NRC has concluded that your facility was operated in a safe manner. During

the period, we observed continued good control of plant operations. Your efforts to reduce

the number of control room deficiencies and the number of valve, switch, and breaker

mispositionings have been positive. Excellent coordination between operations,

maintenance and systems engineering personnel resulted in prompt and effective

replacement of a power supply in the control element drive system and precluded an

unnecessary plant transient. We also fcund that a good radioactive waste processing,

.

handline, storage, and transportation program was in place. However, technical

weaknesses were identified in the areas of waste concentration averaging, scaling factor

determination, and determination of curie content.

We also found that your staff developed and followed a comprehensiv) process to ensure

all design and quality assurance issues which might have affected the NUTECH Horizontal

Modular Storage System dry shielded canister were resolved. However, your resolution of

the design issues did not identify an unreviewed safety question involving an equipment

'

malfunction of a different r,p than any evaluated previously in the Updated Safety

Analysis Report. Further, your oplication for a license for the independent spent fuel

storage installation did not provide complete and securate information regarding the

behavior of the dry shielded canister during a vertical top end drop accident.

Based on the results of this i.1spection, the NRC has determined that violations of NRC

requirement:, occurred. These vic,lations are cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation

(Notice) and the circumstances surrounding them are described in detail in the subject

inspection report. All of the violations were identified by the NRC, and included: (1) the

failuro to provide complete and accurate information regarding the behavior of the dry

9804210354 980415

E

PDR

ADOCK 05000317

i

G

PDR

2

0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

IE:01

L

J

'I

2

shielded canister in the license application for the independent spent fuel storage

installation; and, (2) failure to identify a that an unreviewed safety question resulted from a

l

change in the evaluation of the dry shielded canister vertical top end drop accident.

j

You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions specified in the

enclosed Notice when preparing your response. The NRC will use your response, in part,

to determine whether further enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with

regulatory requirements.

in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter,

its enclosure (s), and your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room

(PDR).

Sincerely,

Original Signed by:

Lawrence T. Doerflein, Chief

Projects Branch 1

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket / License Nos.:

50-317/DPR-53

50-318/DPR-69

72-8/SNM-2505

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Violation

2.

NRC Region 1 Integrated inspection Report Nos. 50-317/9tbO1 and 50-318/98-01

cc w/encis:

T. Pritchett, Director, Nuclear Regulatory Matters (CCNPP)

'

R. McLean, Administrator, Nuclear Evaluations

J. Walter, Engineering Division, Public Service Commission of Ma.yland

K. Burger, Esquire, Marylu.d People's Counsel

R. Ochs, Maryland Safe Er.;rgy Coalition

State of Maryland (2)

I

k

i

,

5

3

j

Distribution w/encis:

B. Boger, ADPR, NRR

J. Goldberg, OGC

J. Lieberman, OE (OEMAIL) (2)

H. Miller, RA/W. Axelson, DRA (i)

D. Holody, EO, RI

T. Walker, SES

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

PUBLIC

NRC Resident inspector

Region i Docket Room (with concurrences)

,

L. Doerflein, DRP

R. Junod, DRP

j

t

l

Distribution w/ encl: (VIA E-MAIL)

B. McCabe, RI EDO Coordinator

S. Stowart - Calvert Cliffs

l

S. Bajwa, NRR

!

A. Dromerick, NRR

l

l

M. Campion, RI

j

inspection Program Branch, NRR (IPAS)

l

R. Correia, NRR

l

F. Talbot, NRR

!

DOCDESK

l

i

t

I

l

l

,

1

l

!

l

l

i

!

l

DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\ BRANCH 1\\CC980101. INS

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without

attachment / enclosure

"E" = Copy with attachment / enclosure

"N" = No copy

OFFICE

Rl/DRP

l

Rl/DRP

J

_

NAME

SStewart g)L 4

LDoerflein Yl1J

o

DATE

04/IT/98

f

04/10/98

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

L

l

pa Hog

UNITED STATES

g

f'

g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

g

j

REGION I

o,

4

475 ALLENDALE ROAD

'

KING oF PRUsslA. PENNSYLVANIA 19451415

g . . . . . ,8

l

April 15, 1998

l

.

l

EA 98173

l

'

Mr. Charles H. Cruse

Vice President - Nuclear Energy

l

Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (BGE)

!

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant

1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway

l

Lusby, MD 20657- 4702

SUBJECT:

NRC REGION 1 INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-317/9P 01

AND 50-318/98 01 AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION

Dear Mr. Cruse:

This report transmits the findings of the safety ins, ection conducted by NRC inspectors at

the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant from February 8,1998 to March 14,1998. The

enclosed report presents the results of that inspection. At the conclusion of the

inspection, these findings were discussed with Mr. Katz and others of your staff.

Overall, the NRC has concluded that your facility was operated in a safe manner. During

the period, we observed continued good control of plant operations. Your efforts to reduce

the number of control room deficiencies and the number of valve, switch, and breaker

mispositionings have been positive. Excellent coordination between operations,

maintenance and systems engineering personnel resulted in prompt and effective

replacement of a power supply in the control element drive system and precluded an

unnecessary plant transient. We also found that a good radioactive waste processing,

handling, storage, and transportation program was in place. However, technical

weaknesses were identified in the areas of waste concentration averaging, scaling f actor

determination, and determination of curie content.

We also found that your staff developed and followed a comprehensive procers to ensure

all design and quality assurance issues which might have affected the NUTECH Horizontal

Modular Storage System dry shielded canister were resolved. However, your resolution of

the design issues did not identify an unreviewed safety question involving an equipment

malfunction of a different type than any evaluated previously in the Updated Safety

Analysis Report. Further, your application for a license for the independent spent fuel

storage installation did not provide complete and accurate information regarding the

behavior of the dry shielded canister during a vertical top end drop accident.

Based on the results of this inspection, the NRC has determined that violations of NRC

requirements occurred. These violations are cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation

(Notice) and the circumstances surrounding them are described in detail in the subject

inspection report. All of the violations were identified by the NRC, and included: (1) the

failure to provide complete and accurate information regarding the behavior of the dry