ML20212G499

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 861216 Meeting W/Util & Intermountain Technologies,Inc in Bethesda,Md Re Large Break LOCA Analysis Axial Power Shape.List of Attendees & Presentation Outline on Steam Cooling Model Rev Encl
ML20212G499
Person / Time
Site: Maine Yankee
Issue date: 01/12/1987
From: Sears P
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Thadani A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8701200534
Download: ML20212G499 (21)


Text

. . . - - - _ _ _____ - - - . - _ - _ - - - - - - - _ - _ - - - _ _ - - - _ - - - _ _ _ - - - - - - _ _

o- N D(

JAN 121987 MEMORANDUM FOR: Ashok C. Thadani, Director PWR Project Directorate #8 Division of PWR Licensing-B FROM: Patrick M. Sears, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #8 Division of PWR Licensing-B

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 16, 1986 CONCERNING MAINE YANKEE LARGE BREAK LOCA ANALYSIS AXIAL POWER SHAPE The meeting was held in Bethesda, Maryland. Those who attended are listed in Enclosure 1.

Maine Yankee discussed the implementation of a revised steam cooling model to be used in Phase II of Cycle 10 analysis.

R. T. Jensen of Intermountain Technologies, Inc., presented a steam cooling model revision as outlined in Enclosure 2. Yankee Atomic Engineering personnel presented an outline of the use of that model.

It was agreed by the staff that a Safety Evaluation could be written concerning the proposed Phase I modification of the large Break ECCS Evaluation Model Modifications addressed in Maine Yankee submittals dated September 15, 1986 and November 10, 1986. This does include the steam cooling proposals for Phase II.

unsinal signee c3 Patrick M. Sears, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #8 Division of PWR Licensing-B

Enclosures:

As stated cc w/ enclosures:

l See next page PBD 8 QN PBD68 PBD#8 P tzer PSears;cf AThadani 1 (/87 1/ N 87 1/0/87 8701200534 870112 PDR ADOCK 05000309 P PDR

'b MEETING SU M RY DISTRIBUTION PWR PROJECT DIRECTORATE #8 Docket File NRC PDR

, L PDR PBD#8 Rdg PKrentrfr OGV EJordan BGrimes ACRS-10 NRC Participants PSears RJones NLauben CThomas I

4 i

i

Mr. J. B. Randazza pineYankeeAtomicPowerCompany Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station cc:

Charles E. Monty, President Nr. P. L. Anderson, Project Manager Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company Yankee Atomic Electric Company 83 Edison Drive 1671 Worchester Road Augusta, Maine 04336 Framingham, Massachusetts 07101

/

Mr., Charles B. Brinkman Mr. G. D. Whittier Manager - Washington Nuclear Licensing Section Head Operations Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company Combustion Engineering, Inc. 63 Edison Drive 7910 Woodmont Avenue Augusta, Maine 04336 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 John A. Ritsher, Esquire Ropes & Gray 225 Franklin Street Boston, Massachusetts 02110 State Planning Officer Executive Department 189 State Street Augusta, Maine 04330 Mr. John H. Garrity, Plant Manager Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company

! P. O. Box 408 Wiscasset, Maine 04578 l

I Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 First Selectman of Wiscasset Municipal Building U.S. Route 1 l Wiscasset, Maine 04578 Mr. Cornelius F. Holden Resident Inspector c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box E l Wiscasset, Maine 04578 l

l

Z* Enclosure 1 LIST OF ATTENDEES MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 16, 1986 NAME ,', AFFILIATION PHONE NUMBER Patrick Sears NRC/DPLB 301-492-8006 Ross T. Jerisen ITI (YAEC Consultant) 208-523-7255 Jamal Ghaus Yankee Atomic 617-872-8100 Stephen P. Schultz Yankee Atomic 617-872-8100 X2131 Peter L. Anderson Yankee Atomic 617-872-8100 G. D. Whittier Maine Yankee 207-623-3521 Robert C. Jones NRC/DPLB 301-492-8005 Norm Lauben NRC/DPLB 301-492-8997 Howard F. Jones, Jr. Maine Yankee 207-623-3521 Cecil Thomas NRC/0PLB 301-492-7974

- , , , - ,. - . , - . . . ~ -

,n- , , -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------n - - - --- -

/

\

, l

> WH@ 01ED)C0 @@@u.DC96 [X]@@20. 03WDBD@C9 O

DMDHDDOWWDDU)DC9 TH@C3@[L@@D30 0 0C9%

R' l

l I

9

-0BJECTIVES

-ASSUMPTIONS

-NODEL DESCRIPTION

-RESULTS .

-SENSITIVITY STUDIES

-T00DEE2 RESULTS

-FURTHER JUSTIFICATION l

l

-CONCLUSIONS l

l l

l l

l l

l

.o

, OBJECTIVES

1. REMOVE EXCESSIVE CONSERVATISM PRESENT IN EXISTING YAEC STEAM COOLING MODEL.
2. UTILIZE INFORMATION FROM FLECHT-SEASET IN DEVELOPING AND JUSTIFYING THE NEW MODEL.
3. SATISFY THE INTENT OF APPENDIX K BY CONSERVATIVELY COMPUTING THE EFFECT OF THE BLOCKAGE UPON THE CHANNEL FLOW AND HEAT TRANSFER.
4. ASSURE THAT THE STEAM COOLING MODEL IS ALWAYS CONSERVATIVE COMPARED TO THE FLECHT CORRELATION.

9

~ -

V

-COOLANT FLOW IS SATURATED STEAM

-COOLANT TEMPERATURE IS CONSTANT AT TSAT

-DOMINANT HEAT TRANSFER IS PER FLECHT CORRELATION

-EXISTING YAEC FLOW DIVERSION MODEL WILL BE UTILIZED

-CHANGE IN HEAT TRANSFER DUE TO FLOW DIVERSION WILL BE CALCULATED

-HEAT TRANSFER ENHANCEMENT DUE TO SINGLE PHASE TURBULENCE WILL BE CONSERVATIVELY CALCULATED

-HEAT TRANSFER ENHANCEMENT DUE TO DROPLET BREAKUP WILL BE NEGLECTED 1

McCEL DESCR0PTCCM

-CONSIPER! fig SINGLE PHASE STEAM FLOW

-A MODEL HAS BEEN DEVELOPED IN FLECHT SEASET FOR HEAT TRANSFER ENHANS MENT DUE BOUNDARYLAYER SEPARATION AND REATTACHMENT WITH THE MAXIMUM COEFICIENT OCCURING AT THE REATTACHMENT POINT

-FROM ABRUPT EXPANSION EXPERIMENTS, ZEMANICK AND DOUGALL FOUND NUMAX- 0.2 REDSEP '

-FROM FLECHT SEASET 161 ROD UNBLOCKED STEAM COOLING TESTS NU -0.0797 REDO '

s

-DIVIDING WMAX,0.2 REDSEP NUO 0.0797 REDO

-ASSUMING CONSTANT MASS FLOW WMAX

- 2.5 (Do/DSEP)2/3 Wo

-FLECHT SEASET DATA IS BETTER flT WITH A CONSTANT OF 1.88 RATHER THAN 2.5 l

-fCR THE YAEC MODEL, THE EFFECT OF FLOW DIVERSION MUST BE C0fiSERVITIVELY ACCOUNTED FOR. SiliCE WE KNOW G/GO, WE CAft WRITE l

WMAX

- CONS (G/G0 9/hDSEP/DoW l 50 WHERE_G

-lF THE DIAMETER USED IN THE MODEL IS DEFINED AS

f. D = (4A/11 )1/2

/

TH MODEL CAN BE WRITEN AS WMAX

- CONS (G/Go)2/3(1.-BLK)l/3 WO WHERE BLK IS THE BLOCKAGE FRACTION.

-AS THE BOUNDARY LAYER REATTACHES AND THE FREESTPEAM TURBULENCE DECAYS, THE EllHANCEMENT DECAYS EXPONENTIALY AS WZSU0

- exp-C(Z-ZMAXII/D0 WMA>cNUo OR, NUz

- 1. + (NUMA>(NUo - 1.) exp-C(Z-2MA>lDO NUO C - 0.6 - 0 A5(DSEP/Do)

-TO GET HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT Hz Z H0 NUz [D NUO 00 NU2

= hQtr51#2 - - - -

e

SUMMARY

OF EQUATE 0NS AMD ASSUMPTCOMS

= CONS (G/G O ) /3 (1.-BLK)1/3 NU O NU Z

= 1. + (NU MAX /NU n

- 1.) g-@-2MAXNO NU O C = 0.6 - 0.45(DSEP/Do)

. HZ NUz

_=

/(1. - BLK )1/2 H0 NU n l

-APPLICATION ASSUMPTIONS

-REATTACHMENT OCCURS AT RUPTURED NODE

-H RATIO = NU RATIO EXCEPT AT THE RUPTURED NODE

-G USED IN ENHANCEMENT EQUATION IS LOCAL VALUE l

-CONS = 1.1

-HZ/Hoi 1.0

.: a

/

20% BLOCKAGE CONS = 1.1 1.0000 +++,,,,. ..

0.9800 [c._+-+--+-+

0.9600 0.9400 NUZ/NUMAX 0.9200 0.9000 l 0.0000 0.8600

  • 0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 DISTANCE ADOVE BLOCKAGE, FEET l

.?b

, /

/--

i 20% BLOCKAGE CONS =l .1 1.0000 - y ,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_, ,_, ,

0.9900 -

0.9800 -

0.9700

  • HZ/HMAX 0.9600 - .

0.9500 -

i 0.9400 -

0.9300 0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 DISTANCE ABOVE BLOCKAGE, FEET i

4 m

w -,rw.,, -sy ,w ny--,- ,ww,wy.wwr-www w w ,rw-, , - m--4 w -mw-mwwvwww-y-wgww.-my%--e,gw,---#,-r-m --

~

30% BLOCKAGE CONS =1.1 1.0000 - y +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-4 0.9500 -

[

?

0.9000-NUZ/NUMAX 0.6500- -

l l 0.8000 -

l 0.7500

  • l 0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 l DISTANCE ABOVE BLOCKAGE. FEET l

l l

l

, e

- - - - - --,--,r +.--y.w ..,,e~, ----.w-.- f- .m- - - , , - ,,,----,.,..-.-.,o e , ---- . . , . - , - - , - - . , - - - - , , ~ , . - - - - - ...w, , . . .---,.%.w. ..+ --- -

9

.' a a'

/

/

30% BLOCKAGE CONS-1.I 1.0000 - e_e-e-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-e +-+

0.9800 -

0.9600 -

0.9400 -

HZ/Ht1AX 0.9200 -

0.9000 -

l l 0.8800 -

+

0.8600 0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 DISTANCE ABOVE BLOCKAGE, FEET l

i l

(

.b

/

,. ~

60% BLOCKAGE CONS =1.1 1.0000 -

j_e-e-+--+-+--+--+-+-+-+-+-+ 0-+

0.9500 -

0.9000 --

0.6500 --

0.8000 --

NUZ/l!UMAX 0.7500 -

0.7000 +

0.6500 -

0.6000 -

e 0.5500 0.000 0.500 I.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 DISTANCE ABOVE BLOCKAGE, FEET l

I  %

4

.Ib '

/

60% BLOCKAGE CONS-1.1 1.2000 "

1.1000

  • 1.0000- y o -e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-+-+-+-+ -e

, 0.9000 '-

HZ/Ht1AX l 0.8000 -

0.7000--

0.6000 -

0.5000 .

0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 DISTANCE ABCVE BLOCKAGE. FEET t


,y 4- -- - -n , - - ,-- .,,-n--- ,,,-,--rr, - , .

-,,,w,----+,

" ~

T0@DEE2 RESULTS ELEVATION OLD MODEL FLECHT NEW MODEL 9.96 ,- 1639. 1639. 1639.

Id[21 2019. 1858. 1858.

10.51 1822. 1817. 1817.

11.04 1552. 1552. 1552.

NOTE: FLECHT AND NEW MODEL PCT'S OCCURED PRIOR TO STEAM COOLING PERIOD.

6 I

l i

MODOFDED T00DEE2 M@ DEL RESULTS 1

/

ELEVATION OLD MODEL FLECHT NEW MODEL 9.96 1921. 1921. 1921.

10.21 2291. 2017. 2029.

10.51 1955. 1946. 1947.

11.04 1620. 1619. 1619.

l

l FURT[MR MGBR JOIST 0F(CAT 0016

-FURTHER, SENSITIVITY STUDIES USING T00DEE2 ARE NEEDED TO ASSURE THA.T-THE N0 DEL IS CONSERVATIVE FOR ALL BLOCKAGES

-FURTHER COMPILATION OF RELATIVE EXPERIMENTAL DATA IS NEEDED

C@BCCLUSCMS

-FLECHT SEASET, FEBA, AND OTHER TESTS HAVE SHOWN BLOCKAGE TO ENH@C[ HEAT TRANSFER

-ENHANCEMb 4T IS DUE TO STEAM TURBULENCE AND DROPLET BREAKUP

-CONSIDERING ONLY STEAM TURBULENCE IS CONSERVATIVE AND CONSISTENT WITH APPENDIX K

-PROPOSED MODEL REMOVES EXCESS CONSERVATISM IN OLD MODEL

-PROPOSED MODEL IS CONSERVATELY ACCOUNTS FOR BLOCKAGE EFFECTS AND SATISFIES THE INTENT OF APPENDIX K i

- ,. .~,- - -- - -- - . - - -

,--