ML20212F729

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Repts 50-010/97-20,50-237/97-20 & 50-249/97-20 on 970915-1002 & Nov.Insp Reviewed Chemistry & Radiological Environ Monitoring Programs & Gaseous & Liquid Effluent Program
ML20212F729
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/30/1997
From: Grobe J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Jamila Perry
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20212F732 List:
References
50-010-97-20, 50-10-97-20, 50-237-97-20, 50-249-97-20, NUDOCS 9711050076
Download: ML20212F729 (3)


See also: IR 05000010/1997020

Text

4

g@ .

r

..

c

October 30, 1997

Mr. J. S. Perry

Site Vice President

Dresden Nuclear Power Station

Commonwealth Edison Company

6500 North Dresden Road

Morris, IL 60450

SUBJECT:

NRC RADIATION PROTECTION INSPECTION REPORTS 50-10/97020(DRS);

50 237/97020(DRS); 50-249/97020(DP.S) AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION

Dear Mr. Perry:

On October 2,1997, the NRC completed an inspection at your Dresden Ganerating Station,

Units 1,2 and 3. The results of the inspection were discussed with you and others of your

staff on September 19,1997. This also refers to the teleconference with Mr. Cliff Howland

on October 9,1997, to discuos the results of those inspection activities conducted on

September 30 and October 2,1997. The enclosed report presents the results of this

inspection.

The purpose of the inspection was to review the chemistry and radiological environmental

monitoring programs, and the gaseous and liquid effluent program. In addition, the inspection

included a review of a recent Unit 1 work stoppage, prompted by problems identified by the

station's quality verification organization, and a prelirninary review of the circumstances

surrounding a September 30,1997, radiological incident that resulted in smali intakes of

radioactive material to several workers involved in Unit 1 activities.

Overall, programs for radiological environmental monitoring and liquid and gaseous effluent

control were effectively implemented. Station oversight of the radiological environmental

monitoring program and contractor performance in the sample collection process were

particularly good. Although the overallimplementation of the chemistry program was generally

good and included an effective reactor water chemistry management program to reduce

chemical contaminants and initiatives for continued improvement to water quality, some

exceptions were noted in certain areas of the chemistry program.

Two violations were identified with the implementation of the routine chemistry program. These

violations are cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice) and the circumstances

surrounding them are described in detailin the subject inspection report. The violations consist

of failure to: (1) follow station procedures during chemistry sampling activities; and (2)

complete surveillances on the high radiation sampling system at required intervals. The firs'

violation demonstrates failures to consistent., impiement the Stop/Think/Act/ Review (STAR)

process. The second violation was attributed to a lack of supervisory continuity and oversight

of the high radiation sampilng system and included problems with the review and maintenance

of system surveillance records.

I

!

Ob

l

,,

{Td"loEIISkogo

y{is{I2fl}UIMIi

'

-

--

-

..

.

$

<

J. S. Perry

2

October 30, 1997

You are required to espond to this letter and should follow the Instructions specified in the

enclosed Notice when prepa-ing your response. The NRC will use your response, la part, to

determine whether further enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with

regulatory requirements.

in addition, we understand that the station is continu! rig its dose assessment and root cause

analysis of tne intake incident that occurred on September 30,1907. We request that you

provide Mr. Gary Shear of this office a written report of your findings when those efforts are

completed. We will review this incident further during c future inspection,

in accordance with 10 CFR 2.700 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Dccument Room.

We will gladly discues any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

Is/ John.A. Grobe

'

John A. Grebe, Director

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nss. 5010; 50 237; 50 249

License Nos. DPR 02; DPR 19; DPR-25

Enclosures:

1. Notice of Violation

2. Inspection Reports 5010/97020(DRS); 50 237/97020(DRS);

50 249/97020(DRS)

Sco Attached Distributl90

DOCChtENT NAME: G:\\DRS\\DRE97020.DRS

g qm n. - m , w . c.au n. -~. v . cm g .-- . v . mm

OFFICE

Rlli

c

Rlli

.,lg Rlli

4

Rlli

&

Rlli

4

Allip[_

_

NAME

Slawinski:JdTw PauM W /

OrthW

Shear &f

MWerUrau Q[giW

DATE

10h/97

10Al/97

10lM97

10/j//97

10t#97

10//G7

OFFICIAL RECI $NY

'

- _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _

_ _

_ - _-

_ _ _ .

_

L

.'

l

f

J. S. Perry

3

October 30, 1997

i

cc w/encis:

R.J Manning, Executive Vice President,

Generation

M. Wallace, Senior Vice President,

Corporate Services

E. Kraft, Vice President, BWR Operations

Liaison Officer, NOC-BOD

D. A. Sager, Vice President,

Generation Support

D. Farrar Nuclear Regulatory

Services Mana0er

1. Johnson, Licensing Operations Manager

Document Control Desk - Licensing

T. Nauman, Station Manager, Unit 1

M. Heffiey, Station Manager, Ureits 2 and 3

F. Spangencerg, Regulatory Assurance

Manager

Richard Hubbard

Nmhon Schloss, Economist,

Office of the Attorney General

State Liaison Officer

Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission

Ditkib.ullon:

Docket File w/encls

SRI, Dresden w/encls

R. A. Caprs, NRR w/encls

PUBLIC IE 01 w/encls

C. Pederson, Rill w/encls

TSS w/encls

OC/LFDCB w/encls

LPM, NRR w/encls

CAA1 w/encls

DRP w/encls

A. B. Beach, Rllt w/encis

DOCDESK w/encls

DRS w/oncis

J. L. Caldwell, Rill w/encls

Rlli PRR w/encls

Rl,I Enf. Coordinator w/encls

l

_ _

_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - ..

. ..

.

.

.

.

-