ML20212F514

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-454/97-13 on 970811-0918 & Nov. Overall,Sg Replacement Initiative Demonstrated Good Engineering Effort Focused on Safety
ML20212F514
Person / Time
Site: Byron Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/30/1997
From: Grobe J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Graesser K
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20212F518 List:
References
50-454-97-13, NUDOCS 9711040319
Download: ML20212F514 (3)


See also: IR 05000454/1997013

Text

.

-

.

..

.

.

.

. ' .

.

October 30,-1997

'

Mr. K. Graesser

Site Vice President -

Byron Nuclear Power Station

Commonwealth Edison Company '

4450 North German Church Road

Byron,-lL 61010

<

SUBJECT:

NRC STEAM GENERATOR REPLACEMENT INSPECTION REPORT

50J44/97013(DRS) AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION

Dear Mr. Graesser:

,

On September 18,1997, the NRC completed an inspection at your Byron Nuclear Power

Station. The purpose of the inspection was to review the engineering and planning efforts for

the upcoming Unit 1 steam generainr replacement project. The enclosed report presents the

results of this inspection.

Overall, your steam generator replacement initiative demonstrated a good engineering effort

focused on safety. In particular, we noted that the replacement stenm generator (RSG) design

changes and material upgrades represented significant improvemeats over the original steam

generators. Further, we concluded that the steam generator replat ement prtgram complied

- with the American Society for Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Section XI requirements.

However, we are concemed with two aspects of your RSG program. In particular, the scope of

the RSG safety evaluation appeared limited and the control of design basis inpots for

calculations supporting the RSG replacement wananted improvement.

One violation was identified, with two examples, for failure to fully consider the impact of the

RSGs on safety related systems affected by this modification. The inspectors identified that the

RSG modification wnuld likely impact the design basis plant cooling performance of the residual

-

heat removal system and this had rsot_been evaluated by your staff. Additionally, the effects of

a main steamline break and a main feedline break on containment sump and pH levels

i-

(potentially impacted by the RSG modification) had not been evaluated. We consider these

errors to indicate a less than rigorous engineering staff effort for evaluation of the scope of

effected systems impacted by the RSG modification.

'

Another violation was identified, with two examples, for failure to fully ensure design basis

inputs had been incorporated into calculations supporting the RSG modification, inspectors

identified ' hat input errors had been made in determining the reactor coolant volume change

associated with the RSG modification, which affected several other analysis. Of particular

concem, was a design basis heat load input missing from the calculation supporting the

minimum condensate storage tank water volume inventory, which appeared to invalidate your

staffs conclusions documented in the RSG safet/ evaluation. These errors indicated a lack of

attention to detail for control of design basis inputs in calculations supporting the RSG

modification.

q%9

<

l1111111118Il!lEl@lllll

~

9711040319 971030

'

PDR

ADOCK 05000454

G

PDR

- {} {

.

-

.E

7.;

,

!

=

K. Graesser.

'

-2

October 30, 1997L

The violations are cited in thts enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice) and the associated :

' circumstances are described in detail in the enclosed report.' Please note that your are required

to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice when

i preparing your response. The NRC will use your response, in part, to determine whether

further enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements, in -

accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its .

enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

iWe will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

-original signed by J. A. Grobe-

. John A. Grobe, D' actor.

,

- Division of Read %fety

Docket No.-50-454 -

- License No.- NPF-37-

Enclosures:

1. Notice of V!olation

2.: Inspection Report 50-454/97013(DRS) -

cc w/ encl:

R. J. Manning, Executive Vice President, Generation

M, Wallace, Senior Vice President, Corporate Services

H. G. Stanley, Vice President, PWR Operations

Liaison Officer, NOC-BOD '

.

D. A. Sager, Vice President, Generation Support

D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory Services Manager

,

I. Johnson, Licensing Operations Manager

Document Control Desk - Licensing -

-

'

K. Kofron; Station Manager

D. Brindle, Regulatory Assurance Supervisor

Richard Hubbard.

Nathan Schloss, Economist, Office of the Attomey General .

State Liaison Officer

State Liaison Officer, Wisconsin

. Chairman, Illinois Commerce Commission

,

See Attached Distribution:

DOCUMENT NAME: ~ G:DRS\\BYR97013.DRS

. To eoceive a co py of this document, Indicate in the box 'C' = Copy w/o attach /end *E' = Co)y w/ attach /enct *N* = No copy

l OFFICE .

Rill:DRS

6

Rill:DRS

l

Rill:DRP

M

Rlil:DRS,,

l

l NAME

Holmberg/lc 4r

Gavula dlf)

Lanksbury90S -

Grobe Vffi

o

l DATE:

10M/97

10/n/97l1

10lofl97

10/7'/97

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

.

..

..

l

--

.~ ..

. . .

.-

-

- ..

.

r

K. Graesser-

-3-

October 30, 1997

e

Distribution:

- Docket File w/ encl- _

SRI, Byron w/enci

TSS w/ encl

PUBLIC IE-01 w/enci

LPM, NRR w/enci

CAA1 w/enci

OCFO/LFARB w/encI

A. B. Beach, Rill w/enci

- DOCDESK w/enct

DRP w/enci -

J. L Caldwell, Rlli w/enci

' DRS wlenci

Rlli Enf. Coordinator w/enci

Rill PRR w/ encl

R. A.~ Capra, NRR w/enci

i

!

.

.

  • I

-

.,.

- -

.

- - -

-