ML20212F478
| ML20212F478 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Bellefonte  |
| Issue date: | 12/29/1986 |
| From: | Zech G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20212F461 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-438-86-07, 50-438-86-7, 50-439-86-07, 50-439-86-7, NUDOCS 8701120021 | |
| Download: ML20212F478 (1) | |
Text
..
. u..,p,
- x..
I.
ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Tennessee Valley Authority Docket Nos. 50-438, 50-439 Bellefonte 1 License Nos. CPPR-122, CPPR-123 The following violation was identified during the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) an inspection conducted on October 1 - November 30, 1986. The. Severity
- 1evels were assigned in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C).
Criteria V,
and the accepted QA Program (TVA-TR-75-1A, Rev. 8) Section 17.1. A.5, requires in part that activities affecting quality be prescribed by documented procedures of a type appro-
. priate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these procedures.
Bellefonte Stancard Practice BLA 16.1, Identification of Conditions Adverse to Quality and Corrective Actions, par. 1.0 states that documentation of conditions adverse to quality should be made promptly, within three working days after identification by plant personnel.
Contrary to the above, activities affecting quality were not being accom-plished in accordance with documented procedures in that during the heating of a 12 inch diameter stainless steel pipe in the Spent Fuel Cooling System, the pipe became distorted and Corrective Action Report ~ (CAR)
No. BLN-CAR-86-14 was initiated on November 14, 1986, which is 9 days after the distorted condition of the piping was identified. This exceeds the 3 days maximum allowed by BLA 16.1.
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement II)
Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201, Tennessee Valley Authority is hereby required to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of this notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged violation; (2) the reasons for the violation if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Original signed by r
h11[phk 50 g
Charles M. Upright G
Gary G. Zech, Director Division of TVA Projects Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this &$ day of December 1986
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _