ML20212D180

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Undated Ltr Forwarding Form 424 for Application to NRC for Financial Assistance to Enhance Technology Transfer & Dissemination of Nuclear Energy Process & Safety Info,To Be Submitted W/Proposal to Listed Address.Related Info Encl
ML20212D180
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/31/1986
From: Thompson R
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
Shared Package
ML20212D148 List:
References
FOIA-86-845 NUDOCS 8612310308
Download: ML20212D180 (39)
v • d • e


Text

--____._ _ - _______ _

  • p >> ** coq'o g

UNITED STATES

- E'

'g g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5

W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 9%, '...../

SUBJECT:

STANDARD FORMS FOR APFLYING FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE Please find enclosed Standard Form 424 (which includes Parts II - V) to be used in applying to NRC for federal assistance.

Should you desire to apply to NRC for FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO ENHANCE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND DISSEMINATION OF NUCLEAR ENERGY PROCESS AND INFORMATION, please submit the completed Standard Form 424 along with an original and six copies of your proposal to the following address:

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission ATTN: Grants Officer Division of Contracts Office of Administration Washington, DC 20555 If we can be of further assistance, please call (301) 492-4294.

Sincerely, (TRAld

[Mh q.naldD. Thompson.fChief Contract Neg~otiation Branch No. 2 Division of Contracts Office of Administration

Enclosure:

As stated 1

e612310300 e61230 b

PDR

%/d db/V[

$0$uhe6e45 3

1 a-

g----

-es----

w------s--+e,-

r mw-

---vvy,-

,.w-

-y e>-

--y-.-w

OWB Agg roveJ No om 2 APPU.. a NUMSE2 3? STATE a NUM8ER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE CANrs AP m APPu.

CATiOw

t. TYPE CATION 10Em O NOTICE Or INTENT cceTiONAL: "*

n.DATE n.oATE O

OTm Tw monen der ASStGNED Y*er m**

  • der O AePuCATiON is is Emer PireA
4. LEGAL APPUCANT/REOPIENT 5 EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMSER (EIN) t Appecent Name
b. C

. Urut r

6.

. soseu m ees g

a NUM8ER l l l-l J l l

< c8r

. Coun.,

t'sinne

, zip Coe.

'8"" N MULTIPLE O h Contact Pereen (Nem, k TTTLE a r,4,asar N-1 0 T. TTTLE OF APPUCANTS PROJECT (Use wiu6 fV of Wue form to provees e summary esecrtpean of me

s. TYPE OF APPUCANT/REOPIENT 3

prosecu 1

  • -*=== gc=4 c aasum m em.newsumma Q

W E

k I

th I

Earar gpreys se lerwr

8. AREA OF PROJECT IMPACT (Nemas a(cirms ammans sneass ear./

f

10. ESTIMATED NUM8ER
11. TYPE OF ASSISTANM OF PERSONS SENEFITING I-ems p,== h"s=w t a

3 13 PROPOSED FUNOING 13.

CONGRESSIONAL DISTRsCTS OF:

14. M W APPUCATON a-au-c-assem e FEDERAL 8

00

^

e %- _1 Aame ser=o < mar 6 O e APPUCANT

.00 0 Owent are 1,* gee c STATE

.00 15 CT START to. gCT Ng I" """" "

d LOCAL

.00_

e OTHER 14.DATE TO masse de

'***fe' l l l I

,,,s,

.00 rtDEm AGENCv e.

i. roer 19 FEDERAL AGENCY TO REMfvE MOVEST
20. DISTING FEDERAL GRANT IDENTIFICATION NUM8ER a ORGANt2ATIONAL UNIT (IF APPROPRIATE) tL ADMINISTRATIVE (XWTACT (IF kNOWN)
c. ADDRESS
21. REMARKS ADOED h

Ygg No To me best of my knoweseos and essef, a YES. THIS NOTIM OF tNTENT/PREAPPUCATsON/APPUCATION WM MADE AVAILA8tE TO TH 22.

f does h fue pr**Pr raeon/sppeceman THg a

DECUTNE ORDER 12372 PROCESS FOR REVIEW Ost APPUCANT are tuo and conect, the document has DATE CERTIFIEg been ahdy aumortsed by me govemog THATo.

body of me especent and the e usi congfy man the anscfied esswances b. NO, PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED OY E O.123T2 O W 9te assistence le approved OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW O 23.

a TYPED NAME AND TITLE CERTIFYING 4 88GNATURE REPRE.

BENTATWE 24.APPUCA.

Year mesed esp 2S. FEDERAL APPUCATON IDENTIFICATION NUM8ER 26. FEDLRAL GRANT IDENTIFICAT80N T10N REMfWD 10

21. ACTION TAkEN M.

FUNDING Fear mont4 der Year Nepel4 dBAP l 0 4 AWARDED 0 E W CTED 29 ACTION DATES.

19 DATE 19 O &

O FOR a FEDERAL g

.00 38. CONTACT FOR AD01TIONAL INFORMA.

32.

Year most4 dear gy 7

TION (Name end arkpAnne nemeer/

E 0

0 g RETURNEDFOR E

t0 E O.12372 SU8MISS80N

c. STATE

.00 31 REMARRS ADDED BY APPUCANT TO a LOCAL STATE 00 O e DEFERRED e OTHER 00 0 L MTHORAWN f.

TOTAL 8

.00 0 T.e O No NON T640 01-006-4142 424-103 PREVIOUS EDettON ST ANDARO FORM 424 PAGE I (Rev. 4-44)

Q NOT URAR4 F heersierd be OW# (%&ee e.MP

OENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SF-424

.This b o standard form used by applicants as a required facesheet for preapplications and applications sobrnetted in accordarw with OMB Circular A-102. It will be used by Federal agencies to obtain applicant ceftification that statesi wfech have estableshed review and comment procedure in response to Executive Order 12372 and have selected the program to be' included in the process have been given an opportunity to review the applicant's submission.

APPUCANT PROCEDURES FOR SECTION I Appacent un compiece as nome in Secean i wnh me excepson or Bon 3. "Stam Apphenson idonenw " n an nom se not apphceblo, wme "NA." N addeonel t3 needed, insert an assertok "*," and use Secean N. An explaneton tomows for endi nom:

Aann Inom 1.

Martc appropriate boa. Proeppucanon and apphcanon are descnbod in (a rev6eion or augmentaton under nem 14), edlcate onh the amount c OM8 Circular A-102 and Federal agency program instruceone. Use of me change. For decreasse, enclose me amount in perenmeses. N tM thle form as a Noeca of intent is at State opeon. Federal agencies do basic and supplomomal amounts ars induded, breakout in Secton f9 not require Noeces of Intent.

For munipte program funding use totale and show program breakout 2a.

Apphcent's own cortrol number, if desired.

in Secean N.12e-amount requested from Federal Govemmon-N W

12W M Sm 2b.

Date Section I is prepared (at appbcont's opbon).

apphcart le not a State.126-emount from local govemment, 3a.

Number assigned by State.

appacent le nd a beel govemmem.12 -arnount from any oma sources, explain in Seceon N.

6.

Dam WW W h 46-4h. Legal name of apphcent, name of primary organizanonal unit which weit The districe(s) where most of acean work we be accomphehed. W cet>

13b.

undertake the senestance acevny, complete address of apphcant, and mde or Ste* wide, 000 eng sevwal dietnc'a, write "cny wide" (-

" State-wide."

non mio 14.

A. Now. A submenal for project not previouch funded.

5.

Employer idonencanon Number (EIN) of apphcant as asa.gned by the B. Renewel. An extensen for an addemonal funding / budget penod fur '

In4mW Reenue Senrtce project having no protected compienon date, but for which Fedem 6a.

Use Catalog of Federal Domestic Asastance (CFDA) number assagned support must be renewed each year.

to program under which assistance is requested. If more than one C. Reveen. A modrRcanon to project neturo or ocope which may reeu' program (e g. jo6nt fundeg), check "muropae" and explain m Secton in Nnding change (ncrease or dmesset j

IV. If unknown, crie Public Law or U S. Code.

D. Consnuason. An extensen for an additenal fundmg/ budget pencs 8b.

Program see from CFDA. Abbrevisie if necessary.

b a project wnh a projected compwoon dem.

7.

Use Secton N to prov6de a summary descripton of the protect if E. AugmarHamon. A mquuoment for addeonel Nnde for a protec appropnate, i.e., if propect affects paracular snee as, for example, prwbush awarded Nnds in me same Nndeg/ budge penod construceon or real propwty projects, attach a map showing the Pmiect natum and scopa uncheNed.

project locahon.

15.

Approximate dato prchect expected to begin (usue#y maannated wt j

8.

"Cny" includes town, townshep or other municipeltty.

eenmated dem of eradabildy of Nnding).

9.

Ust only targest urwt or units affected, such as State, county, or city.

16.

Esameled number of monme to complete profect after Federal W 10.

Esemated number of persone direcey tyonefreng from profect t 1.

Check the type (s) of eseistance requested.

17.

Complete ony for revisons (item 14c), or augmentatone (item 1ee). l j

A. Basec Grant-an orig 6nal request for Federal Nnds.

18.

Dele preappfcanon/applicanon must be submmed to Federal agency B. Supplemental Grant-4 request to increase a basic grant in certan

  1. D
  • "9*" # "d*0 ****'"** "'

cases where the eligtie apphcant cannot supply the required 19.

Name arvi address of the Federal agency to which thee request D matcheg share of the besac Federal provem (e g, grants awarted addracord. Indicate as cieerty as posesble me name of the omco O by the Appaiechen Regonal Comrnisamn to prov6de the appucant wNch to apphceton wis to desvwed 20.

Exiserg Federal grant idonencanon number if ins is not a new reques I E. Other. Explain in t4cton N.

and direcey relates to a prevous Federal acean. Otherwee wresl l

12.

Amount requested er to be contnbuted during the Arst Nnding/ budget "M"

)

period by each contnbutor. Value of ir>ksnd contnbunone should be 21 Check opprogrtate boa as to whether Secton N of form contaare inesuded. N ee scion is a enange e dolier amount of an euenna orant romersa and/or ado,eond remarks are anacnod J

l

)

APPUCANT PROCEDURES FOR SECTION li Apphcants win alwsys complete edher item 22a or 22b amtiteme 23e and 23b

)

221 Complete if appbcanon is subject to Executive Order 12372 (State 22b Crock af apphcanon le not subject to E.O.12372.

rev6ew and comment).

234 Name and see of authortred representeeve of legal apphcant.

FEDERAL AGENCY PROCEDURES FOR SECTION 111 Applicant completes ony Secnona I and N Secton IN le completed by f ederal agencies 26.

Use to idennfy award actions wW contreute 28c-amount from State. A appicant 6e not a State 27.

Use Secton N to ampiay where appropriate.

28dh imm locat gwwnment, d apphcart le not a knl govwr>

s ment 28e-amount frorn any other sources, ensain in Secton N.

t 28.

Amount to be contnbuted dunna the first fureng/ budget penod bY 29.

Date acton was taken on thee request.

each conenbutor. Value of ir>lund contreutions we be 6ncluded N the 4

acton et a change in dotar amount of an satseng grant (e revtson or 30' Date Nnde we become avadable augmentaton under item 14), indicate only the amount of change. For 31.

Name and teenphone number of agency person wtc can provide more decreases, enclose me amount in parentheses. If t'oth besee and mformanon mgard6ng me asemance.

i i

supplemental amounts are incturfed, breakout in Section N. For multspie 32.

Date after when funde we no longer be eva; tab 6e for obngation.

]'

program furdog. use totals and show program breehoute in Secton IV.

33.

Chuck appropriate bos as to whether Secton N of form coctatre 28a-amour,t awarded by Federal Cawernment. 28ts arnount apphcant Federal tomarks and/or attachment of addeonel remarka i

_ _.__. - _ -._ -,-- -._.__ m. _ _ _., - -, _ -. - - -,

~,. = _, _. -

e PART'II PROJECT APPROVAL INFORMATION Item 1.

Does this assistance request require Name of Governing Body:

State, local, regional, or other priority rating?

Yes No Priority Rating Item 2.

Does this assistance request require Name of Agency or Board:

State, or local advisory, educational or health clearances?

Yes No (AttachDocumentation)

Item 3.

Does this assistance request require clearinghouse review in accordance (Attach C)mments) 1 with OMB Circular A-95?

Yes No Item 4

'Does this assistance request require Name of Approving Agency:

State, local, regional or other plan-ning approval?

I Yes No Date

~

Item 5.

Is~ the proposed project covered by Check one:

State

(([/

Local

/,[~/

an approved comprehensive plan?

Regional

[_f Yes No Location of Plan Item 6.

WIll the assistance requested Name of rederal Installation:

serve a Federal installation?

l Federal poupulation benefiting from I

Project

O PART II - PROJECT APPROVAL INFORMATION -(Cont'd) 4 Item 7.

Will the assistance requested be on Name of Federal Installation:

Federal land or installation?

Yes No Location of Federal land Percent of Project J

Item 8.

Will the assistance requested have See instructions for additional an impact or effect on the information to be provided.

environment?

Yes No Item 9.

  1. flT~the assistance requested cause Number of:

the displacement of individuals, Individuals families, businesses, or farms?

Families Yes No Businesses Farms 4

Item 10.

Is there other related assistance on See instruction for additional this project previous, pending, or information to be provided.

anticipated?

_ _ _Yes No Item 11.

Is tWi project in a det.ignated flood See instruction for addit.lonal ha/,ard area?

information to be provided.

Yes No e

e

9 INSTRUCTIO8d5 PARTll zope of the plan. Give me location wheee the appeovait plan is available foe esamination and state whethee this Nepstsee answers w.it not esquese an emplanetson unless the project is in confoemance with the plan Fede*al agency requests more information at a later date.

item 6 -Show the population retsding or worliang on the Psovede suppl enentary data for all "Yes" answeet in the i

D'" *

"'0 I"

*""'P'*8'C'-

space pmveded in exordance with the following instruc-l'un*

leem 7 - Show the percen. age of the proiect work that will be conducted on federally owned or teawd land G ve the l'em 1 Psewide th; name of the governeeig body ettablish, name of the Fedesel enstalleleon and ett incation seeg the psectely eyttent angl the precelty valeng ausgned to U"8#

item 8 - Describe tweefly the onv.bte benet.ceal and harme item 2 - Prownie the name of the.9ency oe tened which ful empact on the enve'onment of the penswwd peusect il 6tunt the eteseance and attach the vlucuenentation of status de adved te envuonmental impact es mitsespated e s pleen or appeuvel what art.om will tir taken to m nimsie the impact I nh e al item 3 - Ariah the ele asmghnuse comments foe the apple-

" ""d'd aatios, in accoedance w.th the enstructions contained m Of-I f.ce et Management and Budget Cneutae No. A 95 It com-liem 9.. State the numbee of.nd.valuati. famshes, tuse enents weet tubnulled previously with a preapplecation, do peggeg, or tasms thes peosect well displace f edeeal agenceet not tulunet them agam but any additional comments ee-will p,ovede separate mtteuctions it addelsonal data es seived from the tirasenghuute thould be submitted with tweded i

ttus application item 10 Show the F nterat Oomest.c Assiglance C.etakut

(

lleen 4 - f uen.sh the name of the appenveng agency and the me pe ram n mei e of mistne, the ste appe evel dete' tus and the amount of each peugect wheee these es selated item 5 - Show n6ethee the apprownf compethengewe plan previout, pendeng or anticipatnf attestarie. Use addie unal it State, local or seyonal, or el none of these, emplein the theets, if needed.

l l

[

\\

l l

l l

l 9

4 L

=. - - _..... - -. _ _.. - - -

~

PART III - BUDGET INFORMATION

~

SECTION A - BUDGET

SUMMARY

Grant Program Function Estimated Unobligated Funds New or Revised Budget or Federal Activity Catalog No.

Federal Non-Federal Federal Non-Federal Total (a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g) 1.

5 2.

3.

4 5.

TOTALS l

9

a p

w N

W la

)

t 5 o(

T

)

4

)

(

d y

t i

4c v

C i

(

t S

c N

E A

O I

I R

r T

O o

A G

M E

n

)

R T

o 3

5 O

A i

(

F C

t l!

N c

I T

n E

u T

G F

E D

G U

D B

m U

a B

rg 5

or I

N P

)

I O

2 5

I I

t

(

T n

I i

T C

a R

E r

A S

G P

)

1 5

5

(

II ii*

i Ii ;

s s

e e

i g

r r

o a

s g

s h

e e

t C

g t

i r

a f

n t

a C

e l

o c

h e

n a

i e

C r

s l

e u

t r

o s

e B

r.

s t

c i

t c

a n

e e

c u

D c

n l

n e

)

m i

a r

e S

I C

o g

e p

l r

t r

l r

L s

n v

i p

t s

e a

i A

m t

r i

a u

p n

n h

t d

T a

c e

r r

q u

o o

t o

n O

r e

P F

T E

S C

C O

T I

T g

j o

b r

G 3

3 c

d e

f g

n i

j s

P 3

7

re s

t l

r a

a t

u o

Q T

h

)

t e

(

4 s

~

e cru r

o e

S tr r

a e

u h

Q t

O dr

)

3 d

(

S S

D E

E C

E R

U e

N O

t H

S a

E t

S r

R S

A e

C tr L

)

D a

A c

E u

R

(

T Q

E D

SA d

EF C

n t

E 2

N n

R O

a O

N c

F i

lp C

p D

r A

N N

e O

t O

)

I I

b T

(

T a

C C

u E

E Q

S S

ts 1

l ra m

e Y

ar t

go s

r 1

P r

t o

f nar l

G a

t

)

o i

a T

(

lare S

l d

L a

e A

r F

L T

e A

O d

n T

T e

o O

F t

T 8

9 0

1 2

3 4

5 1

1 1

1 1

1

h truo F

)e

(

T C

E

)

J s

d O

r r

R a

i P

e h

Y T

E

(

H

)

T s

d d

(

F o

O ir E

e

)

C P

N y

A g

r L

n d

Na A

i n

Os B

d o

I s n

c Te R

u e

Ac O

F S

Me F

R n e

)

O D

r c

Ff E

u

(

Ni E

D t

I V)

E u

s I s E

F Tt T n N

Ee Ao Ge S

Dh Ri R t D

Us A c N

t B

u if U

s l

r F

r Ra Mt E n As i

L F

Ho R n A

Ti Gi R

)

Ot O

E b

i R r D

(

d P e E

d p

F Fa h

F Nd O

Oe V c I a Ih t

E Tc T

Ca Tt RA A

Et A(

M St P

A I

T

(

S E

T EGD m

U a

B rg or E

P N

t O

n s

I a

T r

e C

G s

g E

e r

S

)

g a

a r

h

(

a C

h C

t c

s t

e k

c r

r e

i a

S r

d m

L i

n e

A D

I R

TOT 1

2 3

2 2

2 6

7 8

9 0

1 1

1 1

2

~

INST RUC710N5 PART let the pantor egency. Enter in Columns (c) avut idl the eitt.

meted amounts of Nnds wbd will renam uembbgeted et General inetn,ctes ibe end of the yent Nr? ding period on/r of the F nderal Tbs form is desipied so that applacJtion can be made fo, pante agency iniwtions prwde for & Omerme, Nrwis from one-er more grant proyams, in preparing me leave those columns blank. Enter in columns (el ams (f) the budget, adhere to any esisting Federal gento, agency enounts of funds reeded for me upcomme penod The peidefines which prescribe how and whethef* %dgeted amount (s) in Column (g) should be the mam of amounta m amounta should be separately shows for different Anctions Columns (el sad (f).

or actkitsee wi@m the progism, For some programs, pant.

For supplemental grana and changes to esosting gennes, or agencies may require budgets to be separately shown by do not use Columns (c) and (dL Entee in Colurnn 'el the Nnction or actrvity. For other programs, grantor agencies amount of the meresse or decrease of Feder 6 funds and may not require a breakdown by Nnction or attNity. Sec-enter in Column (f) the amnunt of the mcreme or druease tsons A, 8, C, and O could include budget oct. mates for of non Federal Nnds, in Column (el entre it e new total the whole proiect eseset at en applying for assistance budgeted amount (Federal and non Federall wh.ch erWdes w,uch requires Federal authoritatiori in annual or other the total preveous authorited budgeted arrourits plus or Nnding pened increments, in the tatter cane, factions A,3, minus, as appropriate, the amounts shown in Columns (el C, and O thould proride the budget for the first budget and (fl. The amount (s) in Coh.mn (g) could not equal the porsod (viually a yearl and Sectson E should present.the mim of amcunts in Columns (el and (f).

nasd for Fedevel ausstance in the tutnequent budget per6 Line 5 - Show me totals foe alt columns used oda. All appistatiorn sould contam a tareekdown by the cissect clan categoeies shown m Lines a k of Oection 3, Section 5. Budget Cateymee Sartson A, Budget Summary

,, g g,, %,

g g y,, g,m,, g,,% g Liams 1-4 Columne (el and (bl.

the sane progr amt. Nnctions, and activibes shown on Lines For applic.ations pertaming to a smg/e Federal grant pro, 1-4, Column (al, Section A when additional **ets acie gram (Federal Osmentic Amsunce Catalog numtwel and prepared for Section A, provide similar eosumn he etie=p on riot requermg a Nnctional or actrvery breakdown, enter on each theet. For each proip am, Nis;teon or actrvity. fill in Line 1 utider Column (a) the catalog proyam title and the the total requirements for funds (both Federal att non, cat.alog numter in CoNmn (bl.

Federall by object class categories For applicauons perisining to a smg/e program requ, Wop b"**

  • N#'***"*#
  1. dd taadyet amnunts by multiple Nnctions or activities, enter cost tud st (obiect classi category for ** h column with 9

the name of each activity or Nnction on end line in Coe, urnn (el, and enter the catalog numter in Column (bl. For F'89'8'"* b"8 D0" O' -tivity Feeding applications pertaining to mutop/c programs where none of Line 6i - Show the totals of lines fia to 6h m e a h rn8umrt me prog + ems recune a teostdown by Nnction or activify, d WM im % m eiter the catalog program title on ess line in Coluenn (a) aruf the respective catalog number on each line in Column E "E I'"#*

(bl.

Lirio 6h = Entei me total of amwnts on Lines 6e uni Gi For soplicanons peruirung to irvinose progesms w% +re For all appl at.ons 'nr new gre its and contmoate m 1+ anti one or more prisgrams renwire a breakdown by Nnctioev or the total amount m column ($1, Line (A, Muid to the

.e-1rvity, peepees a separate sheet for earh progaem requiring imme as the total armune shown m Section A, Coh erm 19),

the besekdown Additiones meets could be used when one Line 6 For wrotemental 9, ants anit changa to g'.nti, the utm does not provide siequate inste for all tseendown of tota # amount of the mcrea.e or dester.s as hwn en Con riata eespaired However, when more than one sheet is used, umns (1) (4), Line Gk should tie tne %eir'e as the sum of the to,first pagn thould provuto the summary totals by pro-amwnts m Section A, Columns (el and (fl im (.n, 's Ahen v.m.

a.sditional sheets woee e, epa,e 1 ihe i i e o semem es er Lines 14, Columne (s) through (gl.

ply only to the first page with mammary fetalt for new app /,cJoons, leave Columns (c) and (d) blank.

(,ine 7 - Enter the estimated amount of.rwume, if any, f or eerA line entry in Columns (a) and (bl. enter m Col.

espected to te generated feom mis pnnect. Do not stil ne umre (el, (fl, and (g) the appropriate enounts of funds eJheact this irvount from the total pernert aimmet ' hew needoel to esoport the proiect for the firit Nrufing period umfee the pengram narratrve stateme=st the natu* e.od futuatly a yeast wasere of it, oma The estimaint amis qt of prtwy n m.

For tonimueng grant peq/#am app /= sherst, esternet these is>rne may to mnsideie=1 by the I nte'el rIMo' Nen y in femms taefoes the eeuf of esth Neufing perwuf as eequired by deteemmmg the totat amount of the g'anl 1

c-w,

- - -, ~,

..-----,._,r-.

INSTRUCTIOfS PARTIV

c. Idet tify the kinds of data to be collected and main.

PROGRAM NARRATIVE tained and discuss the criterie' to be used to evaluate t%e results and successes of the project. Emplain Wie Prepare the progtam narrateve statement in accordance with methodology that will be used to' determine if Wie the following lastructions fee all new ossistonce pogtens.

needs identified and discussed are being met and if Requests Iw continwotion er refunding and changes en en the results and benefits identified in item 2 are being approved proket should respond to item 5b only. Requests achieved.

for supplemental assistanca should respond to question 5c

d. List organintions, cooperators, connettants, or other only.

key individuals who will work on the project along

1. OBJECTIVES AhD NEF.D FOR TH15 ASSISTANCE.

with a short deu:ription of the nature of their effort or contribution.

Pinpoint any televant physical, economic, social, fitiancial, p

j sostitutional, or other problems requiring a solution. Dern-onstrate the need for assistance and state the principal and Give a preclee location of the project or area to be served I

mabordinate objectives of the project Supporting documen.

by the proposed project. Maps ce other graphic aids enay be l

tation or other testimonies from concerned interests other attached.

than the applicant may be used. Any relevant data based on

5. IF APPLICABLE, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING IN.

planning studies should be included or footnoted.

FORMATION:

2. RESULTS OR BENEFITS EXPECTED,
s. For research or demonstration assistance requests, if:ntify results and benefits to be derived. For example, E',esent a biographical sketch of the program detecter when opplying fee on owerJ to establish a twighborhood with the following information; name, addeess, phone he:lth centet provide a description of who will occupy the number, background, and other qualifying emperiense facility,'how the f acility will be used, and how the f acility for the project. Also, list the name, training and back.

will benefit the general public.

ground for other key personnel engaged M Se l

project.

3. APPROACH.
b. Discuss accomplishments to date and list in chrono-
a. Outline a plan c*f action pertaining to the scope and logical order a schedule of accomplishments, progtees detail of how the proposed work will be accom.

or milestones anticipated with the new funding re.

plished Ia ossistonce pogrom, function er octivity quest. If there have been significant changes in the preided in the budget. Cite factors which might ac.

project ohjectives, location approach, of time deleys, celerate or decelerate the work and your reason fot esplain and justify For other requests for changes or taking this approach as opposed to others. Describe amendments, emplain the reason for the changelsl. If any unusual features of the project such as design of the scope or objectives have changed or en entension technological innovations, reductions in cost or time, of time is necessary, explain the circumstances and

,ot entraordinary social and community involvement.

justify. If the total budget has been enceeded, of if

b. Provide Iw each assistonce pogrom, function or octivity, individual budget items have changed more thes the quantitative monthly or quarterly projections of the pescribed limits cordained in Attachtrent K to accomplishments to be achieved in such terms as the Circular A-102, esplain end lustify the twed Ier number of jobs created; the number of people served; c Milional funding.

and the noenbet of patients treated. When accom.

plishments cannot be quantified by activity or func.

c. For supplemental assistance requests, emplain the tea-teun, list them in chronological ordet to show the son for the request and iustify the need for addit 6enal schetule of accomplishments and their target dates, funding.

6 e

e INSTRUCTIONS PART lli Line 15 - Enter the totals of amounts on Lines 13 and 14 Icontinuedt Section E. Sudget Estimates of Federal Funds Needed for Belance of the Proiest Sacten C. Sourse of Nor> Federal Resourtme Linee 1619 - Enter in Column (al the same grant progeam Line 811 - Ener amounts of non Federal resources that titles shown in Column (s) Section A. A breakdown by wdl be und oss the grant. If in kind contributions are in, function or activity is riot neceuary. For new applications cluded, provide a twief emplanation on a separate sheet. (See and continuing pant applications, ente, in the proper col.

Attachment F, Circulee A-102.

umre amounta of Federat funds which will be needed to complete the program or project over the sutxeeding fund.

Column tel - Enter the program titles identical to Col, Ing periods (usually in years). This Section need not be umn (s), Secties A. A breakdown by function or activity le completed for amendments, changes, of supplements to not necessary, I8 Column (b) - Enter the amount of cash and irkkind con.

if more than four lines are needed to list the program titles tributions to be made by the acolicant as shown in Section Submit additional schedutes as necamary.

A. (S'oe also Attachment F, C;rcular A-102.

Line 20 - Enter the total for each of the Coktmns (bHel.

Column (cl-Enter the State contribution if the appl 6 When additional schedules are prepared for this Section, tantis not 4 Steen or State agency. Applicants which are a annotate accordingly and show the overall totals on this State or State agmcies should leave this column blank.

line.

Column (d) -Enter the amount of cash and irkkind cork Sectbn F - Other Budget Information.

tributions to to made from all other sources.

Line 21 - Use this spar.e to eiptain amounts for. dividual m

Column (e) - Enter totals of Columns (b), (c), and (d),

direct object cost catepries that mey appeat to be out of Line 12 - Enter the total for each of Columns (bMel. The the ordinary or to explain the dotads as required by the enount in Colismin (el should be equal to the amount en Federal yantor agency.

Line 5, Column (gi, Section A.

Llew 22 - Enter the type of indirect rate (provisional, pre Section D. Foresested Cash Needs determined, final or fined) that will be in affect during the Anding pevind, the estimated amount of the base to which Line 13 - Enter the amount of cash needed by quarte, the rate is applied, and the total Indirect e mpense.

from the grantar agency duritig the first year, Life 14 - Enter the amount of cash from all other sources Line 23 - Provide any other suplanatioen emuired hessin needed by quertar chring the fitit year, or any other comments deemed necessary.

PART V ASSllRANCES The applicant hereby assures and certifies that he will comply with the re policies, guidelines and requirements, including OMB Circulars ho, A-95, efulations*

ther A-102 or A-110, and either A-87 or A-21, as they relate to the application, accep-tance and use of Federal funds for this federally-assisted project. Also, the Applicant assures and certifies to the grant that:

1. It pouesses legal authority to apply for the pant; that a
4. It will comply with eequirements of the provisions sesolution, motion or similar action has been duly of the Uruform Relocation Auistance and Real Property adopted or paued as an official act of the appheant's Acquisitions Act of 1970 (P L 91646) which provides governing body, authorising the filing of the application, for fair and equitable treatment of perspns displaced as a including all understandings and assurancas conta'ned result of Federal and federally anested programi, therein, and directing and authoeiring the person identi.

G. It will comply with the provisions of the 444tch Act fied as the official representhtive of the applicant to act which limit 16e political activity of employees, in connection with the application and to provide.uch

6. It will comply with the minimum wage and manimum additional information as may be required.

hours provisions of the Federal Fair i. abor Standards

^ *I' "'

Y "P Y '"

'"d 'd**

  • N*" *I I"'

f

2. It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of nmp ven of and local guvenmenu.

1964 IP.L 8&352) and in amordance with Title VI of I' U # "

* '" P' h 'D i' '* P'" V ' ' '

  • that Act, no perion in the United States shall, on the
    1. P # "' '"
  • P* P "'
    • 'I'
  • N " "

ground,of race, color, or natio,nal origin, be escluded

'P. earance f te ng rn tivated by a desire for private p

from participation in, te denied the benefits of, or be

  • D'""

otherwise suUectest to discrimination under any pro.

Y '"

V' U "'

gram or activity for which the applicant receives Federal

8. It will give the sponsoving agency w the Comptroller financial ausstance and will immediately take any mee-O*ne'ai through any outhorised eepeesentolive tlw suces necessary to effectuate this agreement.

"*'"*""'""b

3. It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
          • "'I*'b*9'*"

N"'

  • 1964 (42 USC 2000d) prohibitmg employment discrimi.
9. If will Comp y with *all requieements impowd by the l

nation where (1) the primary purpose of a grant is to Federal sponswing agency concerning special provide' employment or (2) discriminatory employment

    • quirements ei law, pe,ogram esquirements, and other practices will retult in unequal treatment of pgrions who are of thould te benefiting from the grant sided activity, odministrative requirements.

lo,It will insure that the facilities under its ownurship, 1caso or l

supervision whl.ch shall be utilized in the accomplishment of the project are not listed on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) list of Violating Facilities and that it will notify the Federal grantor agency of the receipt of any communication from the Director of the EPA Office of Federal Activities indicating that a facility to he used in the project is under consideration for listing by the EPA.

11.It will comply with the flood insurance purchane requiremonta of Soction 102 (a) of the Flood Dinaster Protection Act of 1973, Public j

LW 93-234, 87 Stat. 975, dpproved Ducomber 31, 1976.

Section 102 (a) requires, on and after March 2, 1975, the purchase of flood insuranco in communities where such innurance is available as afor condition for the recolpt of any redoral financial annintanco construction or acquisition purpones for une in any area that han buon identified by the Socrotary of the Dopartmont of trouning and Urban Development as an area having special flood hazards.

i

s PART V (Continued)

The phrase " Federal financial assistance" includes any form of loan, grant, guaranty, insurance payment, rebate, subsidy, disaster assistance loan or grant, or any other form of direct or indirect Federal assistance.

12.

It will assist the Federal grantor agency in its compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as amended (16 U.S.C.

470), Executive ceder 11593, and the Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.

469a-1 et seq.) by (a) consulting with the State Historic Preservation Officer on the conduct of investigations, as necessary, to identify properties listed in or eligible

  • for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places that are subject to adverse ef fects (see 36 CFR Part 800.8) by the activity, and notifying the rederal grantor agency of the existence of any such properties, and by (b) complying with all requirements established by the Federal grantor agency to avoid or mitigate adverse ef fects upon such properties.

l l

1

!/16/86

  • ALPHASETICAL LISTING OF GRANT ANARDS PAGE 1 CONTRACTOR GRANT NUMB.

TITLE PERIOD OF ANARD AMOUNT PERFORMANCE TECICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 04-86-303-GRANT PROGRAM - SYMPOSIUM ENTITLED

  • CHEMICAL 12/01/85-5,000 KS 18T:3 STREET, N.H.

0112 PHENOMENA ASSOCIATED WITH RADI0 ACTIVITY RELEASES 12/31/86 CHINGTON DC 20336 DURING SEVERE NUCLEAR PLANT ACCIDENTS

  • tECICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY 04-85-006-GRANT PEOGRAM - THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON 05/01/85-18,000 REACTOR THERMAL MYDRAULICS 12/31/85 INPCRT RI TECICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY 04-85-313-GRANT PROGRAM - SUPPORT OF PUBLICATION LOSTS 63/01/85-3,000 D. BOX Y FOR THE INTERNATIONAL TOPICAL MEETING ON FAST 10/31/85

.K CIDGE TN 37831 REACTOR SAFETY TECICAJ NUCLEAR SOCIETY 05-86-176-GRANT PROGRAM - SYMPOSIUM DURING SEPTEMBER 1986 06/30/86-1,500 FARRAGUT SQUARE 5;STE 700. W FOR DISCUSSION WITH ACADEMIC AND INDUSTRY ON 09/17/86

.SHINGTCM DC 20006

" NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS: PERSPECTIVES AND EMERGENCY PLANNING"

.TTELLE PACIFIC NORTHMEST LARS 27-86-001-GRANT PROGRAM - TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND THE UNITED 11/01/85-35,000

0. BOX 999 STATES POWER INDUSTRY 05/30/86 CHLAN3 NA 99552

-CHN UNIVERSITY 04-85-013-GRANT PROGRAM - GEOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF E'!SEMOLE 09/01/83-125,000 VISION OF ENGINEERING OF SOLUTIONS IN TWO PHASE FLOWS AND COMPLETE 08/31/86

0VIDENCE RI 02912 RESOLUTION OF PR00LEM CHOCKING

.LIFCRNIA. UNIV. OF. SANTA RARBARA 94-85-004-GRANT PROGRAM-DOWNHOLD STRONG MOTION STUDIES:

11/15/84-180,843 PT. OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES STUDIES OF FMAX AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE FOR EMOEDDED 11"14/86 ITA BAR3 ARA CA 93106 STRUCTURES LIFCRNIA. UNIVERSITY OF, LA 94-85-008-GRANT PROGRAM - A METHOD FOR EVALUATION OF RISK 06/01/85-50,000 5 MILGARD AVENUE DUE TO SEISMIC RELATED DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 08/31/86 S ANGELES CA 90024 ERRORS BASED ON PAST REACTOR EXPERIENCE LUMBIS UNIVERSITY 04-84-010-GRANT PROGRAM - CATALOG OF SOUTHEASTERN UNITE 3 09/15/84-30,000 X 20. LOW MEM0tIAL LIBRARf STATES SEISMICITY H YORK NY 10027 09/14/86 NFE~EECE ON RADIATION CNTRL PROG 04-83-005-GRANT PROGRAM - CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR 05/01/83-41,755 G3 BULL STREET LOH-LEVEL RADI0 ACTIVE MASTE MANAGEMENT 12/31/86 LU'!5IA SC 29201 MvER. UNIVERSITY OF 04-85-015-GR. ANT PROGRAM - PEER REVIEW OF REPORT ENTITLED 07/15/85-69,545

0. SQX 10127

"$ HIPPING CONTAINER RESPONSE TO SEVERE HIGHHAY 12/15/86 NVE2 CO 80210 AND RAILROAD ACCIDENT CONDITIONS

'!THCUAKE ENGINEERING RES. INSTIT. 04-82-007-GRANT PROGRAM - WORKSHOP DN STRONG GROUND MOTION 08/01/82-20,000 20 TELEGRAPH AVENUE SIMULATION AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS 01/31/86 RKELEY CA 94704

_. _ ~

s

  • /16/86 ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF GRANT AMARDS PAGE 2

(

CONTRACTOR GRANT NUMS.

TITLE PERIOD OF AMARD AMOUNT PERFORMANCE l RTHGUAKE ENGINEERING RES. INSTIT. 84-85-811-GRANT PROGRAM - THIRD NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON 88/01/85-20,000 118 BEAVER RIDGE ROAD EARTHOUAKE ENGINEERING 10/31/86 10XVILLE TN 37921 iRVARD UNIVERSITY 04-86-384-GRANT PROGRAM - 19TH DOE /NRC NUCLEAR AIR CLEANING 81/02/86-48,000

50 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE CONFERENCE S1/01/87

, J13 RIDGE MA 02138

% C3 UNIVERSITY 04-45-014-GRANT PROGRAM - SUPPORT OF HOMARD UNIVERSITY'S 98/20/85-350 00 GTH STREET, N.H.

CHEPISTRY COLLOGIUM 12/20/85 tCHINGTCM DC 28859 ITERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY S4-86-380-GRANT PROGRAM - INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SOURCE 10/25/85-58,449

0. 80X 103 TERM EVALUATION FOR ACCIDENT CONDITIONS 11/01/85 EMMA. AUSTRIA

!NTUCKY. UNIVERSITY OF S4-85-003-GRANT PROGRAM - UPGRADING THE UNIVERSITY OF 12/01/84-26,630 PT. OF GEOLOGY KENTUCKY'S SEISMIC NETWORK 09/30/86

'XINGTON KY 40586 l.INE. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF 04-82-009-GRANT PROGRAM - AN INVESTIGATION OF RECENT CRUSTAL 08/02/42-374,946

! ATE HOUSE STATION 22 MOVEMENTS IN THE STATE OF MAINE 08/31/86 lGUSTA ME 04333 iRYLAN3, UNIVERSITY OF 84-82-813-GRANT PROGRAM - THERFAL-HYDRAULIC TRANSIENTS 09/27/82-761,247

! C CF SPONSORED PROGRAMS BEHAVIOR OF COOLANT IN SIMULATED REACTOR-09/30/87 l'LLEGE PARK MD 28742 LOOP 1iRYLA~3, UNIVERSITY OF 04-85-010-GRANT PROGRAM - ASSESSMENT OF CONTAINMENT THERMAL 06/01/85-44,593 lPT. OF CHEM. & NUCLEAR ENG.

HYDRAULIC UNCERTAINTIES EMPLOYING EXPERIMENTAL 08/31/86 i+LLEGE PARK MD 20742 ENERGY AND MASS TRANSFER DATA l SSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECH.

84-84-001-GRANT PROGRAM - CARRYOVER AND FALL BACK IN 11/15/83-556,821 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE STEAM GENERATORS 11/14/86 MBRIDGE MA 02139

,T*L CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGSLATRS 66-86-381-GRANT PROGRAM - A SEMINAR ON NUCLEAR ISSUES 84/10/56-18,684 53 17TH STREET SUITE 1500 i

85/e9/85 lMYER CO 80265 lT'L CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGSLATRS 06-87-329-GRANT PROGRAM - A MEETING ON LOH-LEVEL HASTE 11/03/86-14,259 i50 17TH ST.;STE 2100 TECHNOLOGY SELECTION AND 10 CFR 61 LICENSING 88/05/87 iHVER CO 80265 AND A MEETING ON RISK PERCEPTION REGARDING l

LOH-LEVEL HASTE TECHNOLOGY SELECTION

!TIO:tAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 84-41-823-GRANT PROGRAM - PARTIAL SUPPORT OF THE CDPWIITTEE 99/30/81-125,000 l 01 CONSTITUTION AVENUE ON SEISMOLOGY 09/30/87

)SHINGTON DC 28418 I

1 l

v16/86 ALPNABETICAL LISTING OF GRANT ANARDS PAGE 3 CONTRACTOR GRANT NUMB.

TITLE PERIOD OF ANARD AMOUNT PERFORMANCE

.TIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 84-83-897-GRANT PROGRAM - PARTIAL SUPPORT OF THE GEOLOGICAL 88/25/83-40,000 01 CONSTITUTION AVENUE SCIENCES BOARD 05/31/87

.SHINGTON DC 28418

.TIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 84-86-581-GRANT PROGRAM - STUDY OF HUMAN FACTORS RESEARCH 03/81/86-175,000 c1 CONSTITUTIDX AVENUE NEEDS IN NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH 08/31/87

.SHINGTON DC 29418

,TIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 84-86-382-GRANT PROGRAM - PARTIAL SUPPORT OF THE PROJECT 01/13/86-20,000 01 CONSTITUTION AVENUE ON LIQUEFACTION OF SOILS DURING EARTHOUAKES 99/38/86

.SHINGTON DC 28418

.TIONAL COUNCIL ON RAD PROT 8MtAS 84-81-029-GRANT PROGRAM - FORMULATION OF REC 0fetENDATIONS ON 99/30/81-688,088

'10 N00DMONT AVE.. SUITE 1816 RADIATION PROTECTION AND MEASUREMENT RELATED TO 09/3e/86

.THESDA MD 20814 THE TECHNOLOGY BASE NEEDED TO ACCE55 IHt SAFETY OF NUCLEAR PGnEN

.VADA, UNIVERSITY OF 04-85-882-GRANT PROGRAM - LON-SUN AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY, MEERS 12/01/84-9,999 PT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES FAULT REGION 11/30/85 N3 NV 89557 HNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY S4-81-024-GRANT PROGRAM - EXPERIMENTAL PHASE OF THE 09/30/81-247,586 DLD MAIM SUILDING DEVELOPMENT OF A NON-INVASIVE LIQUID LEVEL 12/31/85 IIVERSITY PARK PA 16882 AND DENSITY GAUGE FOR NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR VESSELS rRDUE CESEARCH FOUNDATION 84-83-883-GRANT PROGRAM - THE SEALING OF MIXING IN 01/87/83-310,006 VDE HALL THERMALLY STRATIFIED FLONS 81/31/86 3T LAFATETTE IN 47907 ICIETY FOR RISK ANALYSIS 84-87-115-GRANT PROGRAM - SUPPORT OF THE SOCIETY FOR RISK 11/09/86-15,000 167 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE ANALYSIS 1986 ANNUAL CONFERENCE, NEN RISKS:

12/31/86

.713 RIDGE MA S2148

" ISSUES AND MANAGEMENT *

XAS A&M UNIVERSITY S4-85-985-GRANT PROGRAM - METHODOLOGIES TC ASSESS POTENTIAL 04/01/85-24,939
GIhEEOING EXPERIMENT STATION LIFETIME LIMITS FOR EXTENDED BURNUP FUEL 05/31/86 ILLEGE STATION TX 77843 LE INSTITUTE OF PAPER CHEMISTRY 84-84-889-GRANT PROGRAM - ENERGETICS OF SMELT-AscR 86/15/84-150,000
0. SDK 1839 EXPLOSIONS 86/14/87 PLETON MI 54912

'SKEGEE INSTITUTE 84-84-003-GRANT PROGRAM - PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF THE S2/15/84-19,988 HOOL OF ENGINEERING PROCEDURES FOR THE CALIBRATION OF SHORT CIRCUIT 87/15/86 r$KEGEE AL 36088 CURRENTS IN THE ELECTRICAL PENETRATION ASSEMBLIES e5KEGEE UNIVERSITY 27-86-825-GRANT PROGRAM - DISTINGUISHED LECTURER SERIES: A 09/30/86-200,000 RVE2 CESEARCH FOUNDATION JOINT VENTURE SETHEEN THE CARVER RESEARCH 09/29/48 iSKEGEE INSTITUTE AL 36888 FOUNDATION OF TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY AND THE NRC

l

~

l

/16/86 ALPHABETICAL LISTING OF GRANT ANARDS PAGE 4 CONTRACTOR GRANT NUMB.

TITLE PERIOD OF ANARD AMOUNT' PERFORMANCE RGIIIA POLYTECFNIC INSTITUTE 04-83-008-GRANT PROGRAM - CONSORTIUM IN REFLECTION 07/01/82-99,945

~C OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS SEISMOLOGY 05/31/87 ACKSBURG VA 24061 SCONSIC-MADISDN, UNIVERSITY OF 04-85-009-GRANT PROGRAM - REVIEN OF SARRP' CONTAINMENT EVENT 06/01/85-75,683 l 0 UNIVERSITY AVENUE TREE METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS 95/31/87

' DISDN HI 53706 1: SCCNSIC-MADISON, UNIVERSITY OF 04-85-012-GRANT PROGRAM - A CRITICAL REVIEN OF VAPOR 88/31/85-16,598 1 0 UNIVERSITY AVENUE EXPLOSION THEORY MODELLING 08/30/86 i CISDN WI 53706 l

l i

9

-n--

v

~

~

(

/

Owe A.,,w. =.. r,-.022

  • ==

FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 8 ^'Pu.

a *gT

.==

g,,

CANT s N/A N/A

3. TYPE parAppucatig A*Pu.
n. eAft socNn.
6. Daft y,

.,.a d.,

g, I[ ***

aCTIOes APPUCATIM CATION Fita g

AS$1Cht0 13 C,,8-d* O nonricAriosi or estruer copt) o w ar w rm a acnon

.t.

4. LEGAL APPUCANT/ RECIPIENT
5. FEDERAL EMPLOYLA sotNTinCATION NO.

Appfl t 31.mo

. 0,

< a v,.

l I 1. I I I I

,,0

.. = =

d. Cat 3

&Ce2

^

tir.m

f. h.t.

a

s. 287 0.d.:

r.de.

6. C t t Pos (p e
c..,,3 N/A 4s.l.phe Wat t
7. TITLs ANO DESCstfPnces OF APPUCANT'S PROJECT
s. TYPE OF APPLICANT /AEC8PiENT Energetics of Smelt-Water Explosions U.f'O'.t.

C.3A w.

Ni Y,O*L*7.'l*.i CEu t

3-f This project will determine the efficiency of con-o1*'0"

"*"'8'"

version of thermal energy into mechanical energy in

!!!L,0

,,a steam explosions using the experience of such

  • ~M".M '"'"*

explosions in the paper industry as a data base.

r.<,.,,,e,, sus, @

~

s. TvPc Or AssisiANCc A-4 ie St..t D-4 r

5-3sapt e.i tas.t E.ct g,u,,,,,,,

C4.

pr te 3. ster (s) 14L AREA OF PetOJECT IMPACT (Ne=i

.f edi

.e..ris St. ESTIMATED NUM.

12. TYPE OF APruCATION Appieton Wl 8"*"thIcago. IL E"E?ITEa"S*"*

,E,.,, C,,,,,,

Outagamie County Cook County General Public r.co.,,.. pew. inr* A 13.

PROPOSED FuMDiNG

14. CoNGRCS$10NAL DISTRICTS OF:
15. TYPC OF CHANGE (ree Jse er 33.)

..,ota=

I50,000 muC=

n. eensiCT

'd"

'*. %0. ' * ' " " ' " ' ' ' ' '

8th Wl 8th WI

  • -'*'", " '0%"

s AmecAnT

.e0 o-e.

37 E*"'"*""

as, g cCT s gT

. P=Ong Tm

.oo is N 5 N 2T s'=" 8.*(.J l I I I

s. Locat

.ee w a.

18*$IlMjTo E ODES

.e8 T O yr.ee.d4 d.y it. EXISTING FEDERAL 80ENTiflCATION NUMBEJt g

+w*.,

s.

iurs s18so.000

.es

'EDEAAL AcENCy >

to 84 3 16 N/A se stocaAL AcENCT TO arcove acqutsi <#

cu.ss.a sir d.:

21. mEuAsins Apoco e

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555 m m o N.

22.

a T. a. has v n-w. d **w.

6. w a m,,, n ci /.e arms i,.d = O.us o,=in new e.e...,n t

.= wned m = i. i. N,

z.au,a usm m

m-w. => m-

,,n-c uo 6.a

.av eie = a

=.nu.w..

w TNc

== d

. m. 4=.

e n n.-

AePuCmf m.,uw =

i.e nur e a.

as Cc=nns:

.a.

n

.= = wi

.as e,

N/A O

O TNAT >

m. -

e m.

w..

=.

as O

O 23.

TYPED IMast Afl0 TITLE L SIGNATUM Daft 81Gle[0 CcaTirnNo r,

a a.,

00tTATIVE is 84 3 15

24. AGENCY HAadt g APPUCA. F r me.s4 d.,

AECtlVED 19 at ORGANIZATIONAL uMIT

27. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
28. FEDERAL APPUCATION IDENTIFICATION
29. ADORESS
30. FEDERAL GRANT 10ENTiflCAT40M 3L ACTION TAMEN SJ.

FuhotNG Yr.ne.a

.l.,

34.

y,

,.a g.,

EAYE*

O

  • 8"'*88

'totnat s

40 as. ACTION oATr >

s a '. RETUltfE8 FOR

iPO",."fJ..'?"a^P??,'2^t.=""" L,,,,

r- - *-

><m

' am'caar "o

Oe STAft

.00 o4Tg g,

Aascetstut

d. t.0 Cat A0
37. REMARKS ADDED I

Q 4. DCTERRES OTWER AO Q.6 WfD80AMW t.

ggyat 8

A0 o Y.* ON.

38.

1. t.kl.e.h

_ e riv.d

= g esy _,,.,.,.,, - er.e $ it r i.

C-

b. (Tt[RA.L.AGO CY A-95.O.fTICIAL m Acnon

(

424-101 r

aa s,sTAmoAsto ronie 42. PAsa a no->s,e Ou. P.a.

a u 1A.

MA.

Yr e

l SecTION fW-MmutMS (Pleses reference IAe proper item num6er /re== Sectione I,11 erIII,if appliesNe)

The principal investigator for the project would be of He would be responsible for planning and directing all activities on the project. There will be a subcontract with for certain aspects of the project as sumarized below.

Budget Breakdown

/

Phase I IPC IITRI 550,000 Visits to two boiler manufacturers 130 1,500 Selection of incidents 1,000 Damage Data Acquisition 7,000 Structure Data Acquisition Furnace Structural Model 3,500 22,000 Mechanical Energy of Damage Smelt-Water Conditions 3,000 5,000 Explosion Efficiency Calculation 3,000 Project Management and Reporting 2,500

$20,000

$30,000

.ec Phase II 520,000 Selection of incidents 500 Damage data acquisition 3,000 Structure data acquisition Dissolving tank structure model 2,500 6,500

=

Mechanical energy of damage 1,500 Smelt-Water conditions 3,000 Explosion efficiency calculation 1,000 Project management and reporting 2,000

$E5UU

$10,500 Phase III 580,000 Selection of incidents 2,000 Damage data acquisition 12,500 Structure data acquisition Structure models 3,500 34,000 Mechanical energy of damage 5,000 Smelt-Water conditions 10,000 Explosion efficiency calculation 3,000 Final report 5,000 Project management 5,000

$37,500

$42,500

l

(

(

PART II PROJECT APPROVAL INFORMATION Item 1.

Does this assistance request require Name of Governing Body:

State, local, regional, or other priority rating?

X Yes No Priority Rating Item 2.

Does this assistance request require Name of Agency or Board:

State, or local advisory, educational or health clearances?

Yes No (Attach Documentation)

Item 3.

Does this assistance request require clearinghouse review in accordance (Attach Comments) with OMB Circular A-95?

Yes

  • No Item 4.

Does this assistance request require Name of Approving Agency:

State, local, regional or other plan-ning approval?

X Yes No Date Item 5.

Is the proposed project covered by Check one:

State

/ /

Local

/~~/

an approved comprehensive plan?

X Regional

/

/

y Location of Plan Item 6.

Will the assistance requested Name of Federal Installation:

serve a Federal installation?

X Yes No Federal pqq9ulation benefiting from Project

(-

(-

PART II - PROJECT APPROVAL INFORMATION (Cont'd)

Item 7.

Will the assistance requested be on Name of Federal Installation:

Federal land or installation?

'f Yes y No Location of Federal Land Percent of Project Item 8.

Will the assistance requested have See instructions for additional an impact or effect on the infonmation to be provided.

environment?

Yes v No Item 9.

Will the assistance requested cause Number of:

the displacement of individuals.

Individuals families, bus ~inesses, or farms?

Families Yes x

No s

Businesses Farms Item 10.

Is there other related assistance on See instruction for additional this project previous, pending, or information to be provided.

anticipated?

Yes x

No Item 11.

Is the project in a designated flood See instruction for additional hazard area?

information to be provided.

Yes r

No

.9 PART III - BUDGET INFORMATION SECTION A - BUDGET

SUMMARY

Grant Program Function l

Estimated Unobligated Funds or Federal New or Revised Budget Activity Catalog No.

Federal Non-Federal Federal Non-Federal Total (a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g) l.

$ 150,000

$ 150,000

?.

3.

1 i.

TOTAL.S

$ 150,000

$ 150,000 9

e

a 4

PART III - BUDGET INFORMATION (Cont'd)

SECTION 8 - BUDGET CATEGORIES 6.

Object Class Categories ra t Program, Function or Activity Total (1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(S)

a. Personnel

$ 21,850

$ 21,850 A

b. Fringe Benefits
c. Travel 7,600 7,600
d. Equipment
e. Supplies 1,000 Subcontract with 1.000-

.r

f. Contractual 83,000 83,000
g. Construction
h. Other 500 500
1. Total Direct Charges J. Indirect Charges 36,050 g,oSo 1
k. TOTALS

$ 50,000

$150,000 7.

Program Income 0

o

SECTION C - NON-FEDERAL RESOURCES Not Applicable (a), Grant Program (b) Applicant (c) State (d) Other Sources (e) Totals 8.

9.

10.

^

li.

12.

TOTALS SECTION D - FORECASTED CASH NEEDS Total for 1st Year 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter l

13. Federal

$ 86,000

$ 35,000

$ 20,000

$ 15,000

$ 16,000

14. Non-Federal
15. TOTAL

$ 86,000

$ 35,000

$ 20,000

$ 15,000

$16,000 l

I

SECTION E - BUDGET ESTIMATE OF FEDERAL FUNDS NEEDED FOR BALANCE OF Tile PROJEC (a) Grant Program Future Funding Periods (Years)

(b) First (c) Second (d) Third (e) Fourth 16.

$ 86,000

$ 64,000 g

g 17.

18.

n 19.

20.

TOTALS 86,000 64,000 g

g g

SECTION F - OTHER BUDGET INFORMATION (Attached additional sheets if necessary) 21.

Direct Charges:

l 22.

Indirect Charges:

Provisional Indirect rate of 165% of personnel. costs ($21,850).

Total indirect charge of $36,050.

23.

Remarks:

PART IV - PROGRAM NARRATIVE

.o e

PART IV I

PROGRAM NARRATIVE The following program narrative is prepared in accordance with the instructicns for applications for new assistance programs submitted under Standard Form 424.

e s

i ABSTRACT A program of research is proposed to determine the energy conversion effi-ciency (thermal to mechanical) of steam explosions. This will be accomplished by analysis of smelt-water explosions which have occurred in kraf t paper pulp mill recovery boilers and dissolving tanks. Structural models for the boiler and dissolving tank will be developed and used to calculate the mechanical energy necessary to cause the observed damage.

This mechanical energy, along with data on the amounts of smelt and water available, will be used as inputs into models for calculating explosion energy conversion efficiencies.

The project will be carried out at

. mder the direction of the Principal Investigator, In addition, a consultant,

, from

, will be employed to develop the structural models and calculate the mechanical energy involved in the damage.

OBJECTIVES AND NEEDS When two liquids are brought into contact, and the temperature of the hot liquid is well above the boiling temperature of the cold fluid, violent explosions can take place.

Such explosions are a problem in the kraf t paper industry, the steel and aluminum industries, the liquified natural gas industry, and the nuclear power industry.

When the cold fluid is water, these explosions are usually referred to as steam explosions. They have also been called vapor explosions or RPT's (rapid phase transition).

One of the critical questions regarding steam explosions is what fraction of the thermal energy contained in the hot liquid is converted into mechanical energy of the explosion. This is a controversial issue since there is limited (and conflicting) experimental data on energy conversicn efficiencies in steam explosions.

Anderson and Armstrong (1) analyzed damage patterns from two incidents and estimated that about 10 to 15% of the available ther-mal energy was converted into destructive work.

In small-scale experiments, Anderson and Bova (2) found that the pV work was as high as 15% of the theoretical maximum work. On the other hand, recent experiments at Sandia and elsewhere have yielded kinetic energy conversion efficiencies scattered y

between 0 and about 3%, and typically running around 1% (3, 4, 5, 6).

The question of energy conversion efficiencies in steam explosions is very important in assessing safety risks in nuclear reactors. The WASH-1400 risk estimates, which use conservative assumptions on the probability and con-sequences of steam assumptions, result in steam explosions being a dominant risk factor because of the possibility of a steam explosion forming a missile which would breach the containment.

This view has been challenged by a number of investigators (7, 8, 9).

l

-)

$ i The kraft paper industry has considerable experience with steam explosions.

In the kraf t pulping process, wood is cooked with a caustic sulfide solution to produce the pulp used to make paper.

with about i of the wood which is dissolved, are collected as an aqueous solution known as black liquor.

l This is concentrated and burned in a recovery boiler and the cooking chemicals are recovered as molten smelt (sodium carbonate and sodium sulfide) which runs out of the boiler into a dissolving tank where the smelt is dissolved in water.

Steam explosions (referred to in the industry as smelt-water explosions) have been experienced within the recovery boiler and in the dissolving tank.

There have been at least 80 smelt-water explosions in recovery boilers of which perhaps 20 to 25 were both violent and reasonably well documented.

A considerable number of dissolving tank explosions have also occurred.

The smelt-water explosion experience provides an attractive data base for determining steam explosion efficiencies.

In effect, these may be looked on as large-scale " experiments" on steam explosion violence.

It is proposed to analyze a sufficient number of kraft recovery boiler and dissolving tank explosions to establish the range of energy conversion effi-ciencies (thermal to mechanical) in these real steam explosions.

The need for the research is to add to the body of knowledge which can be used to characterize steam explosions and to add to the understanding of the specific phenomena occurring in these events.

RESULTS AND BENEFITS EXPECTED The results of the study are sunenarized as follows:

1.

A set of values of steam explosion energy conversion efficiencies for 9 or 10 recovery boiler and dissolving tank explosions along with estimates of the range of uncertainty in the values.

2.

Structural models for recovery boilers and dissolving tanks.

3.

Procedures for calculating the amount of mechanical energy responsible for damage to recovery boilers and dissolving tanks.

4.

Procedures for estimating the amounts of smelt and water involved in explosions.

l<

3-The benefits expected would include a better understanding of the potential violence from steam explosions.

of steam explosions in nuclear ~ reactor risk analysis.This should lead to m The study could also lead to changes in recovery boiler design or operation that could reduce the impact of smelt-water explosions.

APPROACH Plan of Action There are two types of reco/ery boilers in use (manuf' ctured by Babcock &

Wilcox and by Combustion Engineering).

a analyses of two recovery boiler explosions, one for each type.The study wo selected on the basis of relative violence, a reasonable knowledge of con-These wou ditions preceeding the explosion, and adequate documentation of the explosion damage. Two candidates have already been identified.

The initial work will concentrate on recovery bof fer explosions because an adequate data base clearly exists.

formalized procedures for reporting recovery boiler explosions.The paper ind information exists in-house at The Institute of Paper Chemistry as a result Much of this of monitoring such explosions for the industry.

The next step will be to extend the analysis to a dissolving tank explosion provided sufficient information on such an explosion can be found.

Dissolving tank explosions tend to involve large quantities of smelt running into water, while bof fer explosions generally involve water running into smelt.

to core melt-down scenarios.In this respect the dissolving tank explosion is a clos Af ter these first three explosions have ben analyzed, procedures will be in hand that facilitate analyzing additional explosions.

These additional ana-lyses can be carried out for substantially less effort-and cost than the first three.

This allows estimations of explosion energy conversion effi-ciencies over a range of explosive violence and smelt-water contact con-ditions.

This will add greatly tc the significance of the results.

A summary of the specific tasks involved in analyzing a given incident is provided in Table I.

--.--,wn-~

,-----7__,

---,w-

a

(

I TABLE I TASKS PER INCIDENT I.

Determination of the mechanical energy released in smelt-water explo-sions from measurements of the damage sustained.

A.

Selection of the specific incident.

1. Review the explosion record for type of incident, magnitude, thoroughness of investigation, etc.
2. Contact boiler manufacturers, pulp mills, and insurance carriers to assess the extent that the damage has been quantified.
3. Obtain necessary releases to use the data.

B.

Acquisition of damage information.

1. Pull out data on damage to furnaces that is in IPC files (from BLRBAC and the API Recovery Boiler Committee).
2. Obtain additional quantitative data on the damage sustained from mills, boiler manufacturers and insurance carriers.
3. Resolve discrepancies and prepare a detailed damage description.

C.

Acquisition of data on furnace (or dissolving tank) structure.

1. Obtain relevant drawings from the manufacturer for the specific boiler (dissolving tank) of interest.
2. Visit the manufacturer (at least once) to discuss construction details and verify concepts.
3. Check with mill to take into account any significant structural modifications made after startup.

D.

Develop a mechanical model of the furnace (dissolving tank) struc-ture.

1. Analyze the damage information reports to determine which por-tions of the furnace received significant permanent deformations.
2. Develop a mechanical model of the damaged portions of the fur-nace based on the as-built drawings and any documented modifica-tions existing prior to the damage.
3. Perform a dynamic load-deformation analysis based on the item 2 mechanical model. A range of load-time histories will be ana-lyzed to determine the sensitivity of the results to variations in the explosion pressure signature.

This task will include the development and application of computer programs to compute the elastic / plastic response of simple lumped parameter finite ele-ment models that will be used to structurally evaluate the furnace response.

(

( E.

Determine the mechanical energy release from the explosion con-sistent with the observed damage.

1. Compute the amount of energy adsorbed by the structure during the permanent plastic deformation response to the explosion.

This will constitute a lower bound on the explosive energy involved in the smelt-water reaction.

2. Determine the most probable pressure signature associated with the damaged furnace components, i.e., floor tube bulge and floor beam deformations and/or vertical tube /buckstay displacements.
3. Translate the most probable pressure signatures for each damaged component to a point source blast energy release magnitude.

This energy calculation will be the most meaningful measure of the total blast energy released from the smelt-water explosion.

F.

Assign error limits for range of accuracy to the mechanical energy release.

II.

Estimate the quantities of smelt and water involved in the explosion and other relevant conditions (temperature, etc.) affecting explosion energetics.

A.

Estimate the amount of water involved.

1. Data on leak size, location, etc.
2. Calculate flow rate out through the leak.
3. Estimate length of time leak persists.
4. Estimate extent of flashing and carryover of entrained drops.
5. Estimate extent water flowed out the spouts.
6. Determine amount of water on hearth.

Note:

For dissolving tanks the amount of water involved is known from the level in the tank.

B.

Estimate the smelt inventory at the time of the explosion.

1. Obtain data on bed size, firing parameters, etc. at the time of explosion.
2. Use average smelt residence time data to estimate inventory.

Note:

For dissolving tanks the amount of smelt involved can be 4

estimated from smelt discharge rates out the spouts.

i C.

Define the geometry of contact insofar as possible.

i D.

Estimate the degree of uncertainty in the quantities involved.

v I

I III. Calculate the efficiency of conversion of thermal energy into mechani-cal energy in the explosion.

A.

Review the models available for calculating explosion energetics.

B.

Select appropriate models and calculate explosion efficiencies.

C.

Provide an estimate of the range of uncertainty in the efficiency.

_ Schedule and Milestones The study will proceed in three phases. The first phase will focus on two complete analyses of recovery boiler explosions, one CE and one B&W, and an analysis of the data base for analyzing dissolving tank explosions.

This phase will develor, the techniques needed for analyzing further boiler explo-sions as well as providing initial values for explosion efficiency.

The second phase will extend the analysis to dissolving tank explosions.

dissolving tank explosion will be completely analyzed.

One This will develop the techniques needed for analyzing further dissolvin providing another value for explosion efficiency.g tank explosions as well as The third phase will provide analyses of another 6 or 7 recovery boiler and dissolving tank explosions.

the techniques developed in the first two phases.Such analysis is simplified bec These additional explo-sions will cover a wide range of violence and contact conditions which will greatly improve the statistical significance of the estimated explosion effi-ciencies.

A sunmary of the time schedule, effort and results is given in Table II.

breakdown of the budget for each phase is also included in Table II and A

detailed in Table III.

TABLE II Approach and Time Schedule The study will proceed in three phases which are summarized as follows:

Phase I - Feasibility of Approach Duration: 5 months (proposed starting date May 15).

Budget:

$50,000 Effdrt:

1.

two complete analyses of recovery boiler explosions; 1 CE and 1 B&W 2.

evaluation of data base

v

(

( Results:

1.

furnace structure models for both B&W and CE units 2.

procedures to calculate mechanical energy involved in furnace damage 3.

procedures to calculate quantitites of smelt and water involved in explosions 4.

procedures for calculating explosion efficiencies 5.

values of explosion efficiency and degree of uncertainty for two explosions 6.

decision on extent of data base for analyzing dissolving tank explosions.

Phase II - Extension to Dissolving Tanks Duration: 4 months Budget:

$20,000 Effort:

one complete analysis of a dissolving tank explosion Results:

1.

structural model of a dissolving tank 2.

procedures to calculate mechanical energy involved in 9

dissolving tank damage 3.

procedures to calculate quantities of smelt and water involved in dissolving tank explosions 4

a value of explosion efficiency with an estimate of the degree of uncertainty for one dissolving tank explosion Phase III - Extensive Explosion Efficience Calculations Duration: 15 months Budget:

$80,000 Effort:

complete analysis of a six or seven more recovery boiler and dissolving tank explosions covering a range of violence and contact conditions Results 1.

Values of explosinn efficiencies for 6 or 7 more inci-dents along with estimates of uncertainty 2.

Greatly improved statistical significance to estimated explosion efficiencies 3.

A summary report on the work

{

l.

' TABLE III Budget Breakdown

_ Phase !

IPC IITRI 50,000 Visits to two boiler manufacturers Selection of incidents 1,500 1,500 Damage Data Acquisition 1,000 Structure Data Acquisition 7,000 Furnace Structural Model 3,500 Mechanical Energy of Damage 22,000 Smelt-Water Conditions 3,000 Explosion Efficiency Calculation 5,000 3,000 Project Management and Reporting 2,500 20,000 W

_ Phase II 20,000 ~ Selection of incidents 500 Damage data acquisition Structure data acquisition 3,000 Dissolving tank structure model 2,500 Mechanical energy of damage 6,500 Smelt-Water conditions 1,500 Explosion efficiency calculation 3,000 1,000 Project management and reporting 2,000 E!iDU 10,500 Phase III 80,000 Selection of incidents Damage data acquisition 2,000 Structure data acquisition 12,500 Structure models 3,500 Mechanical energy of damage 34,000 Smelt-Water conditions 5,000 10,000 Explosion efficiency calculation Final report 3,000 Project management 5,000 5,000 37,500 42,500

(

-g-Methodology The study will depend on existing data on furnace damage and on the con-ditions governing smelt-water contact.

The boiler manuf acturers will be con-tacted to obtain blueprints and structural details to enable making a mechanical model of the furnace.

The model will then serve as the basis for calculating the mechanical energy involved in damaging the unit.

The amounts of smelt and water involved in the incidents and the contact co ditions will be determined from the chronology of events leading to the explosion, the nature of the water source (leak size, etc.), and known operating characteristics of recovery boilers.

Explosion efficiencies will be obtained by comparing the mechanical energy calculated from the damage with the potential energy using standard steam explosion energetics models of the Hicks-Menzies (10) type. Estimates of the range of uncertainty in the mechanical energy release and in smelt-water con-ditions will be used to estimate the range of uncertainty in the explosion efficiency.

Personnel The principal investigator for the project would be Professor of has extensive experience with recovery boilers and smelt-water explo-sions.

He is responsible for monitoring recovery boiler explosions for the API Recovery Boiler Committee and is Secretary of the BLRBAC Subconsnittee on Emergency Shutdown Procedures.

Explosions for the Recovery Boller Committee.He coauthered a Special Report on Smel He would be responsible for planning and directing all activities on the project.

There will be a subcontract with to develop the struc-tural models of the recovery boiler and determine the mechanical energy involved in the damage from explosions. The responsible person at is

, Senior Research Engineer in Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, has extensive experience in this area. He carried out similar analyses of recovery boiler explosions during a Smelt-Water Research Project in the mid 60's.

During the course of the work discussions will take place with represen-tatives of the boiler manufacturers, mill operations personnel, and with knowledgeable experts in the field of steam explosion energetics.

u

(

I References

1. Anderson, R.P. and Armstrong, D.R., Comparison between vapor explosion models and recent experimental results. AIChE Symposium Series 138(70):31-47(1973).
2. Anderson, R.P. and Bova, L., Final report on the small-scale vapor explo-sion experiments using a molten Nacl-H O system. Argonne National 2

Laboratory ANL-76-57, April 1976.

3. Mitchell, D.E. and Evans, N.A., The effect of water to fuel mass ratio and geometry on the behaviour of molten core-coolant interaction at intermediate scale. Proceedings of the International Meeting on Thermal Nuclear Reactor Safety, Chicago, Illinois, Vol.2, p.1011, August 1982.
4. Bird, M.J.,

Thermal interactions between molten uranium dioxide and water:

an experimental study using thermite generated uranium dioxide.

ASME, HTO, Vol.19, pp.41-47, November 1981.

5. Kottouski, H., Mehr, K., and Grossi, G., Vapour explosions studies in a constrained geometry with forced fragmentation and mixing. ASME, HTD, Vol.19, pp.17-29, November 1981.
6. Steam explosions in light water reactors. Report of the Swedish Government Comittee on Steam Explosions, Os! 1981:3, December 1980.
7. Squarer, D. and Leverett, M.C., Steam Explosion in Perspective.

Proceedings of the International Meeting on LWR Severe Accident Evaluation, Cambridge, MA (August 28 to September 1, 1983).

8. Swenson, D.V. and Corradini, M.L., Monte Carlo analysis of LWR steam explosions. NUREG CR/2307, SAND 81-1092.R3, October 1981.

i

9. Cho, D.H., Fauske, H.K., and Grolmer, M.A., Some aspects of mixing in l

large mass, energetic fuel coolant interactions. Proceedings of the International Meeting on fast Reactor Safety and Related Physics, CONF 761001, October 1986 Chicago, Illinois, pp.1852-1861.

1

10. Hicks E.P. and Menzies, D.C., Theoreticcal studies of the fast reactor maximum accident. ANL-7120, pp.654-670, October 1965.

l I

4

-e--

(

pART V ASSURANCES The Applicent hereby essures and certifies thet he will comply with the regulations, policies, guidelines end re-quirements, including OMS Circulers No. A-95, A-102 end FMC 7d-4, es they relate to the opplication, eccept-esce end use of Federet funds (w this federol't-essisted project. Also the Applicent essures and certifies to the grant thet:

1. It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant: that a
4. It will comply with requirements of the provisions j

resolution, motion or similar action has been duly of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property j

adopted or passed as an official act of the applicant's Acquisitions Act of 1970 (P.L 91646) which provides governing body, authorizing the filing of the application, for fair and equitable treatment of peryns displaced as a j

including all understandings and assurances contained result of Federal and federally amisted programs, i

therein, and directing and authorizing me pwson identi-

5. It will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act fied as the official representhtive of the applicant to act which limit 16e political' activity of empicyus.

l in connection with ee application and se provide such

6. It will comply with the minimum wage a uf maximum additional Information as may be required, hours provisions of the Federal Fair Labor Standards 1
2. It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
        • ** '"'Y "PP'Y ** h*i'*I *"d 'd" i'"*t I"i

1964 (P.L 88 352) and in accordance with Title VI of

*" " P'*Y " I'*

  • that Act, no person in the United States shall, on the

. It wal estaWeh safeguards,to prMt splem fra ground of race, color, or national origin, be escluded

" "8

  • "'P"

" b

from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be "8

  • Y*

' " P' '

8' " I *""' "** " ' y'n'e's',P*

Y**

otherwise subjected to discrimination under any pro-i whm ey we amHy, bu w cew h gram or activity for whicts the applicant receives Federal financial assistance and will immediately talte any mee-

6. It will give the spensering egency er the Comptroller sures necessary to effectuate this agreement.

General through eny euthwired representetive the

3. It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of l

1964 (42 USC 2000dl prohitiiting employment discrimi-N

'""*"*I*

8' *"' '

9. If will ce*P Y with
  • ell requirements imposed by the I

nation where (1) the primary purpose of a grant is to

{

provide'employmen't or (2) discriminatory employment Fedwel sponsoring eggncy concerning special practices will roosit in unequal treatment of papons who requirernents of few, program requirements, and other are or should be benefiting from the grant sided activity, edministretive requirements.

10.It will insure that the facilities under its ownership, lease or

}

supervision which shall be. utilized in the accomplishment of the project are not listed on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) list of Violating Facilities and that it will notify the Federal grantor agency of the receipt of any communication from the Director of the EPA Office of Federal Activities indicating i

that a facility to be used in the project.is under consideration for listing by the EPA.

r l

11.It will comply with the flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102 (a) of the Flood Disaster Protectiod Act of 1973, Public Lav 93-234, 87 Stat. 975, alpproved December 31, 1976.

Section 102 (a) requires, on and after March 2, 1975, the purchase of flood insurance in communities where such insurance is available as a i

condition for the receipt of any Federal finan'cial assistance for t

construction or acquisition purposes for use in any area that has l

been identified by the Secretary of the Department of Rousing and Urban Development as an area having special flood hazards.

i 1

w-

-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20212D180&oldid=4000842"