ML20212B351
| ML20212B351 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 02/23/1987 |
| From: | Agosti F DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| VP-NO-87-0029, VP-NO-87-29, NUDOCS 8703030531 | |
| Download: ML20212B351 (3) | |
Text
Frank E. Agosti N lear O tions Detroit r.-
6400 North Dine High*k Nuclear 3 )
operations February 23, 1987 VP-NO-87-0029 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Canission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555
Reference:
1)
Fermi 2 NIC Docket No. 50-341 NRC License No. NPF-43 2)
Detroit Mison to Region III, " Reactor Operations Inprovement Plan," VP-85-0198, dated October 10, 1985 3)
Detroit Edison to Region III Letter, "Mditional Information Regarding the Reactor Operations Improvement Plan, VP-85-0219, dated November 27, 1985 4)
Detroit Mison Letter to the NIC, " Response to Request for Information Pursuant to 10CFR50.54(f), VP-86-0008, dated January 29, 1986 5)
Detroit IMison Letter to the NIC, " Reactor Operations Inprovement Plan," VP-NO-87-0008, dated January 19, 1987
Subject:
Reactor Ooerations Imorovement Plan On September 10, 1985, Detroit Edison met with NIC Region III to discuss operational occurrences at Fermi 2.
Subsequently, Detroit Edison submitted a Reactor Operations Improvement Plan and related additional information in References 2, 3, 4 and 5.
870303 hobb41 PDR A
PDR 00 b'
USNIC February 23, 1987 VP-NO-87-0029 Page 2 In an effort to further enhance both regulatory and operational performance described in the Reactor Operations Inprovenent Plan (ROIP), more restrictive levels of acceptability and more stringent management action levels have been established for the ROIP indicators effective February 1, 1987, as shown in the attachment to this letter.
If you have any questions, please contact Girija Shukla at (313) 586-4072.
Sincerely, Y
[
Attachment cc: Mr. E. Greeruran Mr. W. G. Rogers Mr. J. J. Stefano USNBC Region III J
A'ITACIMENT Peactor Operations Incrovement Plan Cbjectives e
Goal A
@JECflVE: Minimize the number of open work orders
'IUIAL 150 MAL 110 Expected Goal B
@JECTIVE: Minimize the number of EDPs open 30 days after 10 MAL field work conplete 5 Expected Goal C TJECTIVE: Minimize the number of lighted, non-functional -
10 MAL annunciators 6 Expected Goal D TJECTIVE: Surveillances coupleted 100% Expected on tine including grace period Surveillances not 5/ week MAL coupleted within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> 3/ week Expected of reaching the grace period Goal E WJECTIVE: Minimize the number 3 MAL of outstanding, 2 Expected tine-sensitive Icos Goal F
@JECTIVE: Minimize the number of 1.5/ week MAL Licensee Event Reports 1.25 Expected Four Week Rolling Average 1.25/ week MAL 1.0/ week Expected l