ML20212A888

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Copy of Insp Rept 50-289/97-06 Per Executive Director for Operations Commitment to Provide Rept in 970730 Response to
ML20212A888
Person / Time
Site: Crane 
Issue date: 09/05/1997
From: Rathbun D
NRC OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL AFFAIRS (OCA)
To: Gooding W
HOUSE OF REP.
References
50-289-97-06, 50-289-97-6, CCS, NUDOCS 9710270069
Download: ML20212A888 (1)


See also: IR 05000289/1997006

Text

. _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ - _ _ - _ - -

iL e,&

'

.

. . .g

-

.

k

UNITED STATES

I

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS810N

.

WASHINGTON, D.c. SegeM001

    • ,is

September 5,

1997

,

The Honorable William Goodling

United States House of Representatives

Washington, DC 20515

Dear Congressman Goodling:

I am forwardin9 a copy of NRC Inspection Report No. 50 289/97-06. Our Executive Director

for Operations committed to provide this report in his July 30,1997 response to your letter of

June 25,1997.

l

l

Please let me know if you or your staff have additional questions.

Sincerely,

-

Dennis K. Rathbun, Director

Office of Corgressional Affairs

,.

9710270069 970905

~

PDR

ADOCK 05000289

!,! !

i

\\

. . .

. _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ __ _ -. _ _ _ _

_ _ _._ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ .

2

0-

.

,

t

-

.

l.

.

. - .

'

..

l

August 19,1997

5

Mr. James Langenbach

_ Vice President and Director, TMl

,

i

GPU Nuclear Corporation

i

Three Mile Island Nuclear Station

}

Fost Office Box 480

'

Middletown, PA 17057-0191

l

SUBJECT:

NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-289/97-06,50 320/97-02

}

AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION

l

Dear Mr. Langenbach:

j-

On July 27,1997, the NRC completed an inspection at your Three Mile Island 1 & 2

]

reactor facility. The enclosed report presents the results of that inspection.

The inspector noted that your staff's overall r.siformance was good in responding to the

electrical issuer, identified after the loss of offsite power (LOOP) event. Your staff had

t

j

replaced the two damaged substation main generator output breakers with new suitable

breakers. The inspector noted that your staff had planned to determine the cause of

i

unbalanced current condition observed in these breakers by a r,ubstation technician prior to

!

the LOOP event on June 21,1997. Even though your staff had planned to troubleshoot

i

the condition, this issue was not properly documented por your corrective action process

and plant managemer.t was not made aware of this anomaly prior to the LOOP event,

j

Therefore, we are considering this an unresolved open item until our final review is done.

!

. Plant personnel and equipment response to the June 21 reactor trip and loss of offsite

l

power were excellent, especially in light of the previous 617 day continuous run..

l

Management applied a conservative approach to safe plant operation when they decided to

remain in a heightened emergency response mode until the reactor coolant pumps and the

i

main condenser heat sink were restored to service. Excellent coordination and replacement

{-

of the faulty main generator output breakers was noted.

!

l

However, the required notifications to the Ccmmonwealth and risk counties for the June

'

21 Unusual Event were not completed within 15 minutes as required by GPU emergency

l

plan implementing procedures and NRC regulations. The violation for the late notification

l

is cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation, and the circumstances surrounding the violation

!'

are described in detail in the enclosed report. This is a repeat problem that was also noted

i

in two emergency plan exercises in the past 15 months. Additional reinforcement of the

importance of the emergency planning program is werranted to ensure that the ability to

implement the program is maintained. Phase note that you are required to respond to this

letter and should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing

-

your response. The NRC will use your response, in part, to determine whether further

i'

i

enforcement action is necessary to ensure compilance with regulatory requirements.

!

i

,%

-

-

_

me-~

w : . . .c_. -

,- .

,

~

,

.

,

.

.

'

f

,

2

James W. Langenbach

/

The TMI radiological controls occupational exposure program and radiological

environmental monitoring program implementation continue to be effective. Both programs

included strong management oversight and effective quality assurance audits that asse

program s'rengths and weaknesses. The radiation protection department performed

numerous self-assessments and program evaluations of significant scope.

in a:cordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter

and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR),

Sincerely,

-

.

Peter W. Eselgroth, Chief

,

Projects Branch No. 7

,

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket Nos.: 50 289,50-320

License Nos.: DPR 50, DPR 73

Enclosvres:

1. Notice of Violation.

2. NRC Inspection Report Nos. 50-289/97-06 and 50-320/97-02

cc w/ encl:

E. L. Blake, Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge (Legal Counsel for GPUN)

J. C. Fornicola, 0; rector, Licensing and Regulatory Affairs

M. J. Ross, Director, Operations and Maintenance

D. Srnith, PDMS Manager

TMI Alert (TM1A)

J. S. Wetmore, Manager, TMI Ragu!atory Affairs

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Distribution w/ encl:

H. Miller, RA

Region i Docket Room (with concurrences)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

PUBLIC

NRC Resident inspector

W. Axelson, ORA

T. Kenny, DRS

P. Eselgroth, DRP

D. Haverkamp, DRP

A. Keatley, DRP

. .

_ _ _ . . _ _ . ~ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _

_ _ _ . _ . . .

- - - - - - - -

-

- - ,

,

.

.

-

. .

. CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENG SYSTEM

'

  • ~

l

DOCUMENT PREPARATION CFIECH2ST

!.

...

41: check list is to be submitted with each document (or group of Qs/As) sentforprocessing

)

intc the'CCS.

1. 'BRIEF DESCRIPTION OFDOCUMENT(S)

Y

L

-

,

2. TYPE OFDOCUMENT X

CORRESPONDENG

NE4 RINGS (Qs/As)

i

,

3. DOCUMENT CONTROL

SENSITIVE (NRC ONLY) X

NON-SENSITIVE

4. CONGNESSIONAL COMMITIEE AND SUBCOMMITIEE (if applicable)

1

\\

Congressional Committee

[

Subcommittee

'

i

!

5. SUBIECT CODES

l

(A)

(B)

(C)

.

J

6, SOURG OFDOCUM&YIS

l

(A)

5520 (DOCUMENT NAME

)

(B)

SC4N (C)

ATTAWMENTS

,

1

(D)

OTHER

7

7. SYSTEMjLOpDA7ES

- (A) . {dITllVhATA OC4 SENTDOCUMENT TO CCS

t

o

i

(B)

DATE CCS REGIVED DOCUMENT

f

l

(C)

DATE RETURNED TO OC4 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

l

(D)

DATE RESUBMITIED BY OC4 TO CCS '

,

i.

.(E)

DA7E ENTERED INTO CCS BY

e

!

(F)

DATE OC4 NOTIFIED THATDOCUM&VT15 IN CCS

f(6;

O!!

'

COMMENTS:

'

RELEASE TO PDR

- p037

l

(bc Awc(t

i

.

.

.

.

.