ML20211Q943
| ML20211Q943 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07200022 |
| Issue date: | 09/14/1999 |
| From: | Sherwin Turk NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
| To: | Bollwerk G, Kline J, Lam P Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| CON-#399-20819 ISFSI, NUDOCS 9909160018 | |
| Download: ML20211Q943 (2) | |
Text
'2 Of UNITED STATES C Crov,%
k NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- 4
,j WASHINGTON, D.C, 20G55-0001 j
i i
POCKETED l
i S,
/
U5hiiC September 14,1999 OFFICE oF THE
'99 SEP 15 P3 :36 GENERAL COUNSEL i
Om -
Ri
~ G. Paul Bollwerk, lil, Chairman Dr. Peter S. Lam ADJi i T
Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC.20555 Washington, DC 20555 Dr. Jerry Kline -
Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 in the Matter of Private Fuel Storage L.L.C.
'(Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation)
Docket No. 72-22-ISFSI
Dear Administrative Judges:
In accordance with our telephone conference last week, Counsel for Private Fuel Storage, L.L.C.,
the NRC Staff and the State of Utah wish to propose the following combined schedule for litigation of the remaining Group I and Group ll contentions in this proceeding:
j i
SER to beissued 1001/99
- Additionaldiscoverywindow 11/15/99 - 1/31/00 Staff position on Group 1/II contentions 12/15/99 i
Discovery against Staff 12/15/99 - 2/15/00 Motions for summary disposition due 2/1/00 Responses to SD motions 2/21/00 Replies to SD responses 3/1/00
. Decision on summary disposition 3/31/00 Pre-filed testimony 5/15/00 Motions in limine 5/31/00 Hearings 6/19-7/28/00 Findings of fact 8/28/00 Findings of fact respenses 9/28/00 Initial decision 11/29/00 9909160018 990914 a
PDR ADOCK 07200022
- 2) /
C PDR
r-5 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board The parties believe that, in light of the limited number of Group I contentions that would be ready for hearing under the existing schedule, an'd for other reasons stated during the telephone conference, adoption of the above litigation schedule is appropriate.
Sincerely, h
D Sherwin E. Turk Counsel for NRC Staff cc.: Service List l